Elephant Shark Sequence Reveals Unique Insights Into the Evolutionary History of Vertebrate Genes: a Comparative Analysis of the Protocadherin Cluster

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elephant Shark Sequence Reveals Unique Insights Into the Evolutionary History of Vertebrate Genes: a Comparative Analysis of the Protocadherin Cluster Elephant shark sequence reveals unique insights into the evolutionary history of vertebrate genes: A comparative analysis of the protocadherin cluster Wei-Ping Yu†‡, Vikneswari Rajasegaran†, Kenneth Yew†, Wai-lin Loh†, Boon-Hui Tay§, Chris T. Amemiya¶, Sydney Brenner‡§, and Byrappa Venkatesh‡§ †Gene Regulation Laboratory, National Neuroscience Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433; §Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Biopolis, Singapore 138673; and ¶Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA 98101 Contributed by Sydney Brenner, January 14, 2008 (sent for review November 7, 2007) Cartilaginous fishes are the oldest living phylogenetic group of entire extracellular domain, the transmembrane domain, and a jawed vertebrates. Here, we demonstrate the value of cartilagi- small portion of the cytoplasmic domain, whereas the extracel- nous fish sequences in reconstructing the evolutionary history of lular domain of the nonclustered protocadherins is usually vertebrate genomes by sequencing the protocadherin cluster in the encoded by multiple exons (8). Protocadherin cluster proteins relatively small genome (910 Mb) of the elephant shark (Callorhin- are cadherin-like cell adhesion molecules that are highly en- chus milii). Human and coelacanth contain a single protocadherin riched on synaptic membranes (9). These proteins are believed cluster with 53 and 49 genes, respectively, that are organized in to be a vertebrate innovation that accompanied the emergence three subclusters, Pcdh␣, Pcdh␤, and Pcdh␥, whereas the dupli- of the neural tube and the elaborate central nervous system and cated protocadherin clusters in fugu and zebrafish contain >77 and have been hypothesized to provide a molecular code for speci- 107 genes, respectively, that are organized in Pcdh␣ and Pcdh␥ fying the enormous diversity in neuronal connectivity (3, 9, 10). subclusters. By contrast, the elephant shark contains a single No clustered protocadherin gene has been identified in inver- protocadherin cluster with 47 genes organized in four subclusters tebrate genomes (11–13). The protocadherin gene cluster has (Pcdh␦, Pcdh␧, Pcdh␮, and Pcdh␯). By comparison with elephant been characterized in several bony vertebrates (Osteichthyes), EVOLUTION shark sequences, we discovered a Pcdh␦ subcluster in teleost including human and coelacanth and teleost fishes. Human and fishes, coelacanth, Xenopus, and chicken. Our results suggest that coelacanth protocadherin cluster genes are organized in three the protocadherin cluster in the ancestral jawed vertebrate con- tandem subclusters, designated as Pcdh␣, Pcdh␤, and Pcdh␥ (3, tained more subclusters than modern vertebrates, and the evolu- 4). Each subcluster contains multiple ‘‘variable’’ exons (Ϸ2.4 kb tion of the protocadherin cluster is characterized by lineage- each) that are transcribed from independent promoters. Each specific differential loss of entire subclusters of genes. In contrast variable exon codes for an extracellular domain comprising six to teleost fish and mammalian protocadherin genes that have repeats of a calcium-binding ectodomain (EC1–6), a transmem- undergone gene conversion events, elephant shark protocadherin brane domain, and a part of the cytoplasmic domain. In addition genes have experienced very little gene conversion. The syntenic to variable exons, Pcdh␣ and -␥ subclusters contain three block of genes in the elephant shark protocadherin locus is well constant exons at the 3Ј end of the respective subcluster, to which conserved in human but disrupted in fugu. Thus, the elephant each variable exon is independently spliced. The constant region shark genome appears to be less prone to rearrangements com- exons code for the major part of the cytoplasmic domain that is pared with teleost fish genomes. The small and ‘‘stable’’ genome shared by genes in each subcluster. Human and coelacanth of the elephant shark is a valuable reference for understanding the protocadherin clusters contain a total of 53 and 49 genes, evolution of vertebrate genomes. respectively. Because of the ‘‘fish-specific’’ whole-genome du- plication, teleost fishes such as fugu and zebrafish contain two ancestral jawed vertebrate ͉ clustered protocadherins ͉ cartilaginous fish ͉ unlinked protocadherin clusters, designated Pcdh1 and Pcdh2. Callorhinchus milii ͉ gene conversion Although fugu Pcdh1 cluster is highly degenerate, Pcdh2 clusters in both fishes have undergone lineage-specific repeated tandem Ͼ econstructing the evolutionary history of vertebrate ge- duplications, and gene losses giving rise to 107 genes in Ͼ nomes, and in particular the human genome, is a major goal zebrafish (2, 5, 7) and 77 genes in fugu (6). However, these R ␣ of vertebrate comparative genomics. Efforts are underway to teleost protocadherin genes are orthologous to only Pcdh and ␥ reconstruct the evolutionary history of the human genome at the - subcluster genes in mammals and coelacanth. Another inter- nucleotide level and at the level of large-scale chromosomal esting feature of teleost protocadherin cluster genes is that they rearrangements (1) with the objective of predicting ancestral have experienced extensive regional gene conversion events Ͼ Ј genomes with high accuracy. The accuracy of the reconstruction resulting in nucleotide identity of 99% in the 3 region of of ancestral genomes is greatly influenced by the choice and variable exons among paralogs (5, 6). Based on the organization, number of genomes compared. Although a comparison of gene content, and phylogenetic relationships of protocadherin genomes from all major vertebrate groups is desirable, it is also important to compare genomes from the most distant branches Author contributions: W.-P.Y., S.B., and B.V. designed research; W.-P.Y., V.R., K.Y., W.-l.L., of the phylogenetic tree. Here, we show how the genome and B.-H.T. performed research; C.T.A. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; W.-P.Y., sequence from the oldest living phylogenetic group of jawed S.B., and B.V. analyzed data; and W.-P.Y. and B.V. wrote the paper. vertebrates, the cartilaginous fishes, can dramatically change our The authors declare no conflict of interest. inferences of the state of the ancestral vertebrate genome. Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank The protocadherin gene cluster is one of the most evolution- database (accession nos. EF693945, EU267079, and EU267080). arily dynamic loci in vertebrates. It is composed of tandem arrays ‡To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: weiping࿝[email protected], backhill@ of paralogous genes that are highly susceptible to lineage-specific hotmail.co.uk, or [email protected]. gene losses, tandem duplications, and gene conversion (2–7). This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/ These clustered genes are distinct from nonclustered protocad- 0800398105/DC1. herin genes by possessing a large coding exon that codes for the © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0800398105 PNAS ͉ March 11, 2008 ͉ vol. 105 ͉ no. 10 ͉ 3819–3824 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Pcdhδ Pcdhε Pcdhμ Pcdhν 1 X 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 C CX2 CX3 8 CX1 CX2 CX3 1 CX1 CX2 CX3 CX2b 10 11 12 13 15 17 18 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 14 20 4 16 19 21 ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν ν δ ε ψ ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ν ν ν ε ε δ δ δ ε ε ε ε μ μ μ μ μ μ μ ν μ μ μ μ 49C8 166L19 176N9 Fig. 1. Genomic organization of the elephant shark protocadherin cluster. Constant exons at the end of each subcluster are shown in red color. Variable exons in the same paralog subgroup or intersubcluster subgroup are shown in the same color. Only a single pseudogene (␺1) was identified. ␯CX2b is an alternatively spliced ‘‘constant’’ exon. The positions and identification numbers of BAC clones sequenced are shown below. clusters in bony vertebrates, the ancestral vertebrate protocad- three constant exons, whereas the second subcluster is com- herin cluster is predicted to contain either two (Pcdh␣ and -␥) prised of only variable exons (21 in all), each of which is or three subclusters (Pcdh␣,-␤, and -␥) that have subsequently transcribed independently as single exon genes similar to the undergone lineage-specific gene losses and gene duplicat- coelacanth and mammalian ␤ subcluster genes. The third and ions, including the whole-locus duplication in the teleost fish fourth subclusters consist of 8 and 17 variable exons, respectively, lineage (6). and three constant exons each. In addition, the fourth subcluster The living jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) fall into two contains an alternative constant exon between the second and major monophyletic groups, the Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous third constant exons. The splice sites of the constant exons of the fishes that include elasmobranchs and holocephalians) and the three subclusters are shown in SI Appendix, SI Fig. 6.We Osteichthyes (bony vertebrates, which include ray-finned fishes, designated the four subclusters as the Pcdh␦, Pcdh␧, Pcdh␮, and coelacanths, lungfishes, and tetrapods) that shared a common Pcdh␯ subclusters, respectively (Fig. 1). ancestor Ϸ450 million years ago. The protocadherin cluster has To determine the evolutionary relationships between individ- been characterized in several bony vertebrates. Here, we report ual protocadherin (Pcdh) genes in the elephant shark, we aligned the sequencing and characterization of the protocadherin cluster the amino acid sequences of all variable exons using ClustalX from a holocephalian cartilaginous fish, the elephant shark and generated a phylogenetic tree using the Neighbor-joining (Callorhinchus milii). The elephant shark possesses a relatively method. Sequences of only the first three ectodomains (EC1–3) small genome (Ϸ910 Mb) among the cartilaginous fishes and is were used, because the C-terminal ectodomains (EC4–6) have therefore attractive for genome sequencing and comparative been shown to be susceptible to extensive gene conversion in analysis (14).
Recommended publications
  • The Design of Rijndael: AES - the Advanced Encryption Standard/Joan Daemen, Vincent Rijmen
    Joan Daernen · Vincent Rijrnen Theof Design Rijndael AES - The Advanced Encryption Standard With 48 Figures and 17 Tables Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Springer TnL-1Jn Joan Daemen Foreword Proton World International (PWI) Zweefvliegtuigstraat 10 1130 Brussels, Belgium Vincent Rijmen Cryptomathic NV Lei Sa 3000 Leuven, Belgium Rijndael was the surprise winner of the contest for the new Advanced En­ cryption Standard (AES) for the United States. This contest was organized and run by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) be­ ginning in January 1997; Rij ndael was announced as the winner in October 2000. It was the "surprise winner" because many observers (and even some participants) expressed scepticism that the U.S. government would adopt as Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data an encryption standard any algorithm that was not designed by U.S. citizens. Daemen, Joan, 1965- Yet NIST ran an open, international, selection process that should serve The design of Rijndael: AES - The Advanced Encryption Standard/Joan Daemen, Vincent Rijmen. as model for other standards organizations. For example, NIST held their p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1999 AES meeting in Rome, Italy. The five finalist algorithms were designed ISBN 3540425802 (alk. paper) . .. by teams from all over the world. 1. Computer security - Passwords. 2. Data encryption (Computer sCIence) I. RIJmen, In the end, the elegance, efficiency, security, and principled design of Vincent, 1970- II. Title Rijndael won the day for its two Belgian designers, Joan Daemen and Vincent QA76.9.A25 D32 2001 Rijmen, over the competing finalist designs from RSA, IBl\!I, Counterpane 2001049851 005.8-dc21 Systems, and an English/Israeli/Danish team.
    [Show full text]
  • Chondrichthyan Fishes (Sharks, Skates, Rays) Announcements
    Chondrichthyan Fishes (sharks, skates, rays) Announcements 1. Please review the syllabus for reading and lab information! 2. Please do the readings: for this week posted now. 3. Lab sections: 4. i) Dylan Wainwright, Thursday 2 - 4/5 pm ii) Kelsey Lucas, Friday 2 - 4/5 pm iii) Labs are in the Northwest Building basement (room B141) 4. Lab sections done: first lab this week on Thursday! 5. First lab reading: Agassiz fish story; lab will be a bit shorter 6. Office hours: we’ll set these later this week Please use the course web site: note the various modules Outline Lecture outline: -- Intro. to chondrichthyan phylogeny -- 6 key chondrichthyan defining traits (synapomorphies) -- 3 chondrichthyan behaviors -- Focus on several major groups and selected especially interesting ones 1) Holocephalans (chimaeras or ratfishes) 2) Elasmobranchii (sharks, skates, rays) 3) Batoids (skates, rays, and sawfish) 4) Sharks – several interesting groups Not remotely possible to discuss today all the interesting groups! Vertebrate tree – key ―fish‖ groups Today Chondrichthyan Fishes sharks Overview: 1. Mostly marine 2. ~ 1,200 species 518 species of sharks 650 species of rays 38 species of chimaeras Skates and rays 3. ~ 3 % of all ―fishes‖ 4. Internal skeleton made of cartilage 5. Three major groups 6. Tremendous diversity of behavior and structure and function Chimaeras Chondrichthyan Fishes: 6 key traits Synapomorphy 1: dentition; tooth replacement pattern • Teeth are not fused to jaws • New rows move up to replace old/lost teeth • Chondrichthyan teeth are
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs
    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lightweight Encryption Algorithm for Secure Internet of Things
    Pre-Print Version, Original article is available at (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2017 SIT: A Lightweight Encryption Algorithm for Secure Internet of Things Muhammad Usman∗, Irfan Ahmedy, M. Imran Aslamy, Shujaat Khan∗ and Usman Ali Shahy ∗Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology (FEST), Iqra University, Defence View, Karachi-75500, Pakistan. Email: fmusman, [email protected] yDepartment of Electronic Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, University Road, Karachi 75270, Pakistan. Email: firfans, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—The Internet of Things (IoT) being a promising and apply analytics to share the most valuable data with the technology of the future is expected to connect billions of devices. applications. The IoT is taking the conventional internet, sensor The increased number of communication is expected to generate network and mobile network to another level as every thing mountains of data and the security of data can be a threat. The will be connected to the internet. A matter of concern that must devices in the architecture are essentially smaller in size and be kept under consideration is to ensure the issues related to low powered. Conventional encryption algorithms are generally confidentiality, data integrity and authenticity that will emerge computationally expensive due to their complexity and requires many rounds to encrypt, essentially wasting the constrained on account of security and privacy [4]. energy of the gadgets. Less complex algorithm, however, may compromise the desired integrity. In this paper we propose a A. Applications of IoT: lightweight encryption algorithm named as Secure IoT (SIT).
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Construction of Efficient Substitution-Boxes Using Cubic
    entropy Article A Novel Construction of Efficient Substitution-Boxes Using Cubic Fractional Transformation Amjad Hussain Zahid 1,2, Muhammad Junaid Arshad 2 and Musheer Ahmad 3,* 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; [email protected] 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; [email protected] 3 Department of Computer Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-112-698-0281 Received: 27 January 2019; Accepted: 28 February 2019; Published: 5 March 2019 Abstract: A symmetric block cipher employing a substitution–permutation duo is an effective technique for the provision of information security. For substitution, modern block ciphers use one or more substitution boxes (S-Boxes). Certain criteria and design principles are fulfilled and followed for the construction of a good S-Box. In this paper, an innovative technique to construct substitution-boxes using our cubic fractional transformation (CFT) is presented. The cryptographic strength of the proposed S-box is critically evaluated against the state of the art performance criteria of strong S-boxes, including bijection, nonlinearity, bit independence criterion, strict avalanche effect, and linear and differential approximation probabilities. The performance results of the proposed S-Box are compared with recently investigated S-Boxes to prove its cryptographic strength. The simulation and comparison analyses validate that the proposed S-Box construction method has adequate efficacy to generate efficient candidate S-Boxes for usage in block ciphers. Keywords: substitution box; cubic fractional transformation; block ciphers; security 1. Introduction Cryptography helps individuals and organizations to protect their data.
    [Show full text]
  • Rays and Skates (Batoidea) Conservation Profile Synopsis
    Rays and Skates (Batoidea) Conservation Profile Synopsis Status of Ray and Skate Populations IUCN Red List Total Species CR EN VU NT LC DD State of the Batoidea Superorder 539 14 28 65 62 114 256 Rays and skates belong to the Batoidea Superorder and consist of stingrays CR, Critically Endangered; EN, Endangered; VU, and related species (Order Myliobatiforme, 223 species), electric rays (Order Vulnerable; NT, Near Threatened; LC, Least Torpediniforme, 69 species), skates and related species (Order Rajiforme, Concern; DD, Data Deficient. 270 species), and sawfish (Order Pristiforme, 5-7 species). Most batoid species live on the sea floor and are found in a variety of ecosystems across CITES the planet: coastal, deep water (3,000 m), tropical, subtropical, temperate, Appendix 1:7 species cold-water, estuarine, marine, freshwater, and open seas. As opportunistic foragers in complex trophic webs, batoids can impact and alter ecosystems if Appendix II: 1 species 1,2 other top-predators are removed . AZA Subpopulation Several batoids are listed as endangered in US-waters for which smalltooth Marine Fishes Taxon Advisory Group sawfish have a designated critical habitat and recovery plan as of 2009. There Chair Beth Firchau is a high degree of uncertainty with respect to the status of ray and skate populations at the global level even though they are some of the world’s most vulnerable marine fishes3. Many populations are extinct, and many more are critically endangered particularly in coastal ecosystems. Primary Threats to the Species Batoids face extinction risks due to a variety of threats that include capture in nets from targeted and accidental catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Leigh SC, Papastamatiou Y, and DP German. 2017. the Nutritional
    Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2017) 27:561–585 DOI 10.1007/s11160-017-9481-2 REVIEWS The nutritional physiology of sharks Samantha C. Leigh . Yannis Papastamatiou . Donovan P. German Received: 28 December 2016 / Accepted: 9 May 2017 / Published online: 25 May 2017 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 Abstract Sharks compose one of the most diverse Keywords Digestive efficiency Á Digestive and abundant groups of consumers in the ocean. biochemistry Á Gastrointestinal tract Á Microbiome Á Consumption and digestion are essential processes for Spiral intestine Á Stable isotopes obtaining nutrients and energy necessary to meet a broad and variable range of metabolic demands. Despite years of studying prey capture behavior and Introduction feeding habits of sharks, there has been little explo- ration into the nutritional physiology of these animals. Sharks make up one of the most abundant and diverse To fully understand the physiology of the digestive groups of consumers in the ocean (Fig. 1, Compagno tract, it is critical to consider multiple facets, including 2008). They may play an important ecological role in the evolution of the system, feeding mechanisms, energy fluxes in marine environments and in impact- digestive morphology, digestive strategies, digestive ing the biodiversity of lower trophic levels that we biochemistry, and gastrointestinal microbiomes. In depend on as a food and economic resource (e.g., each of these categories, we make comparisons to Wetherbee et al. 1990; Corte´s et al. 2008). However, what is currently known about teleost nutritional beyond prey capture methods and dietary analyses, the physiology, as well as what methodology is used, and nutritional physiology of sharks is woefully under- describe how similar techniques can be used in shark studied.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dawn of American Cryptology, 1900–1917
    United States Cryptologic History The Dawn of American Cryptology, 1900–1917 Special Series | Volume 7 Center for Cryptologic History David Hatch is technical director of the Center for Cryptologic History (CCH) and is also the NSA Historian. He has worked in the CCH since 1990. From October 1988 to February 1990, he was a legislative staff officer in the NSA Legislative Affairs Office. Previously, he served as a Congressional Fellow. He earned a B.A. degree in East Asian languages and literature and an M.A. in East Asian studies, both from Indiana University at Bloomington. Dr. Hatch holds a Ph.D. in international relations from American University. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: Before and during World War I, the United States Army maintained intercept sites along the Mexican border to monitor the Mexican Revolution. Many of the intercept sites consisted of radio-mounted trucks, known as Radio Tractor Units (RTUs). Here, the staff of RTU 33, commanded by Lieutenant Main, on left, pose for a photograph on the US-Mexican border (n.d.). United States Cryptologic History Special Series | Volume 7 The Dawn of American Cryptology, 1900–1917 David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiology of Elasmobranch Fishes: Structure and Interaction with Environment: Volume 34A Copyright R 2016 Elsevier Inc
    6 SWIMMING MECHANICS AND ENERGETICS OF ELASMOBRANCH FISHES GEORGE V. LAUDER VALENTINA DI SANTO 1. Introduction 2. Elasmobranch Locomotor Diversity 3. Elasmobranch Kinematics and Body Mechanics 4. Hydrodynamics of Elasmobranch Locomotion 5. The Remarkable Skin of Elasmobranchs and Its Locomotor Function 6. Energetics of Elasmobranch Locomotion 7. Climate Change: Effects on Elasmobranch Locomotor Function 8. Conclusions The remarkable locomotor capabilities of elasmobranch fishes are evident in the long migrations undertaken by many species, in their maneuverability, and in specialized structures such as the skin and shape of the pectoral and caudal fins that confer unique locomotor abilities. Elasmobranch locomotor diversity ranges from species that are primarily benthic to fast open-ocean swimmers, and kinematics and hydrodynamics are equally diverse. Many elongate-bodied shark species exhibit classical undulatory patterns of deformation, while skates and rays use their expanded wing-like locomotor structures in oscillatory and undulatory modes. Experimental hydrodynamic analysis of pectoral and caudal fin function in leopard sharks shows that pectoral fins, when held in the typical cruising position, do not generate lift forces, but are active in generating torques during unsteady swimming. The heterocercal (asymmetrical) tail shape generates torques that would rotate the body around the center of mass except for counteracting torques generated by the ventral body surface and head. The skin of sharks, with its hard surface denticles embedded in a flexible skin, alters flow dynamics over the surface and recent experimental data suggest that shark skin both reduces drag and enhances thrust on oscillating propulsive surfaces such as the tail. Analyses of elasmobranch 219 Physiology of Elasmobranch Fishes: Structure and Interaction with Environment: Volume 34A Copyright r 2016 Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physiological and Physical Response to Capture Stress in Sharks
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk The Plymouth Student Scientist - Volume 04 - 2011 The Plymouth Student Scientist - Volume 4, No. 1 - 2011 2011 The physiological and physical response to capture stress in sharks Hassanein, L. Hassanein, L. (2011) 'The physiological and physical response to capture stress in sharks', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 4(1), p. 413-422. http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13942 The Plymouth Student Scientist University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. The Plymouth Student Scientist, 2010, 4, (1), 413-422 The physiological and physical response to capture stress in sharks Laila Hassan Hassanein Project Advisor: Kath Sloman, School of Science, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, Scotland PA1 Abstract Exhaustive exercise leads to severe metabolic, acid-base, ionic and hematological changes in sharks. It has been shown that these changes are species-specific and are affected by the magnitude of the cumulative effects of physiological and physical trauma associated with capture. Blood lactate, glucose and pH levels are reliable indicators of the shark stress response and have been extensively studied. Several shark species have been reported to be able to survive physiological stress unless severe physical trauma occurs. As comprehensive information about post release mortality is missing, future investigations should focus on the relationship between physiological disruption and survival rates of tagged and released sharks.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Magnetic Shark Deterrents: Hypothetical
    Aquatic Science and Technology ISSN 2168-9148 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1 Review of Magnetic Shark Deterrents: Hypothetical Mechanisms and Evidence for Selectivity Joshua Courtney, Ya’el Courtney, Michael Courtney BTG Research Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA Abstract Several papers published since 2006 describe effects of magnetic fields on elasmobranchs and assess their utility in reducing negative interactions between sharks and humans, including bycatch reduction. Most of these repeat a single untested hypothesis regarding physical mechanisms by which elasmobranchs detect magnetic fields and also neglect careful consideration of magnetoreception in teleosts. Several species of teleosts are known to have magnetoreception based in biogenic magnetite, and direct magnetic field detection also has support in several species of elasmobranchs. The overly narrow focus of earlier papers on the unsupported hypothesis that magnetoreception in elasmobranchs is based in the ampullae of Lorenzini creates the impression that all teleosts will be insensitive to magnetic deterrents. However, magnetite based magnetoreception has been demonstrated in several teleosts, and is supported in others. Furthermore, electroreception is present in many teleost species; therefore, the possibility of induction based indirect magnetoreception should be considered. Finally, experiments reported as demonstrating insensitivity in teleost species to magnetic deterrents suffer from inadequate design and sample sizes to reject the hypothesis of magnetic detection in any given species. Since adoption of deterrent hook technologies depends on both deterrent effects in sharks and the absence of effects in target teleosts, the hypothesis of detection in teleost species must be independently tested with adequate sample sizes. Keywords: Magnetic shark deterrents, Shark deterrents, Magnetoreception, Teleost, Elasmobranch 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Pathways Toward Gigantism in Sharks and Rays
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.13680 Evolutionary pathways toward gigantism in sharks and rays Catalina Pimiento,1,2,3,4 Juan L. Cantalapiedra,2,5 Kenshu Shimada,6 Daniel J. Field,7 and Jeroen B. Smaers8 1Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA28PP, United Kingdom 2Museum fur¨ Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin 10115, Germany 3Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama 4E-mail: [email protected] 5Departamento Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcala,´ Madrid, Spain 6Department of Environmental Science and Studies and Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago IL 60614 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EQ, UK 8Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, New York NY 11794 Received September 25, 2018 Accepted January 4, 2019 Through elasmobranch (sharks and rays) evolutionary history, gigantism evolved multiple times in phylogenetically distant species, some of which are now extinct. Interestingly, the world’s largest elasmobranchs display two specializations found never to overlap: filter feeding and mesothermy. The contrasting lifestyles of elasmobranch giants provide an ideal case study to elucidate the evolutionary pathways leading to gigantism in the oceans. Here, we applied a phylogenetic approach to a global dataset of 459 taxa to study the evolution of elasmobranch gigantism. We found that filter feeders and mesotherms deviate from general relationships between trophic level and body size, and exhibit significantly larger sizes than ectothermic-macropredators. We confirm that filter feeding arose multiple times during the Paleogene, and suggest the possibility of a single origin of mesothermy in the Cretaceous. Together, our results elucidate two main evolutionary pathways that enable gigantism: mesothermic and filter feeding.
    [Show full text]