DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resources Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resources Inventory NNAATTUURRAALL RREESSOOUURRCCEESS IINNVVEENNTTOORRYY TTOWNSHIP OF MMIDDLE CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY November 2007 Revised May 2010 Adopted by the Middle Township Planning Board on July 22. 2010 Maser Consulting PA American Metro Center 100 American Metro Boulevard Suite 152 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Natural Resources Inventory Middle Township Cape May County, New Jersey November 2007 Revised May 2010 Prepared by: Barbara Edelhauser, Environmental Scientist William Olson, Environmental Scientist Loren Kelly, Environmental Specialist Jacqueline McCort, Environmental Specialist Sharon White, Cultural Resources Specialist Jill Slagle, Cultural Resources Specialist Christopher Walker, Cultural Resources Specialist Marcia Shiffman, AICP, PP, LLA, Project Manager Daniel Bloch, PP, Project Planner Maser Consulting PA American Metro Center 100 American Metro Boulevard Suite 152 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ I 1.0 LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 MIDDLE TOWNSHIP LOCATION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 REGULATORY JURISDICTIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 EXISTING LAND USE AND LAND COVER ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES AND CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 10 2.1 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE AND GEOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 13 2.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SLOPES ................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 SOILS ............................................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.4.1 Soil Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.4.2 Farmland Soils ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.5 CONTAMINATED SITES ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 3.0 WATER RESOURCES AND CONDITIONS ................................................................................... 27 3.1 GROUND WATER RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.1 Aquifers ................................................................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.2 Aquifer Recharge .................................................................................................................................................. 29 3.1.3 Well Head Protection Area ................................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 WETLANDS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 32 3.3 WATERSHEDS ................................................................................................................................................................... 34 3.4 SURFACE WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................................................ 42 3.4.1 Shellfish Harvest Areas ........................................................................................................................................ 44 3.5 FLOODWAYS AND FLOODPLAINS ......................................................................................................................................... 44 4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................................... 46 4.1 BOTANICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................... 46 4.1.1 Marine Plant Communities ................................................................................................................................... 48 4.1.2 Estuarine Plant Communities ............................................................................................................................... 48 4.1.3 Palustrine Plant Communities .............................................................................................................................. 50 4.1.4 Terrestrial Plant Communities .............................................................................................................................. 54 4.1.5 Rare Vegetation Communities and Species ......................................................................................................... 59 4.2 ZOOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................................. 61 4.2.1 Aquatic Animals .................................................................................................................................................... 61 4.2.2 Terrestrial Animals ................................................................................................................................................ 66 4.3 RARE SPECIES AND SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN ........................................................................................................... 71 4.4 CRITICAL HABITATS AND SPECIAL ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES ............................................................................................. 72 4.4.1 Federal Habitat Complexes .................................................................................................................................. 72 4.4.2 State of New Jersey Critical Habitat Mapping ...................................................................................................... 73 4.4.3 NJ Natural Heritage Program Priority Sites .......................................................................................................... 76 5.0 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ......................................................................................... 80 5.1 PREHISTORIC CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................................... 80 5.2 HISTORIC CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................................... 81 5.3 INVENTORIED CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................ 83 5.4 OPEN SPACE / PUBLIC LAND .............................................................................................................................................. 86 5.5 AESTHETIC RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................................... 90 6.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 91 Figures 1. Regional Location Map 2. Regulatory Jurisdictions 3. Coastal Barrier Resources System Units 4. Seasonal Offshore Wind Direction 5. Physiographic Provinces of New Jersey 6. Groundwater Detail 7. Impact of Well on Groundwater Movement Tables 1. Land Use/Land Cover, 2002 2. Temperatures Measured at Cape May 1 NW and Belleplain State Forest 3. Precipitation Measured at Cape May 2 NW and Belleplain State Forest 4. Soil Types of Middle Township 5. Development Limitations of Soils 6. Prime & Other Important Farmland Soils 7. Known Contaminated Sites List 8. Surface Water Classifications of Middle Township Waters 9. Plants of the Marine Intertidal Gravel/Sand Beach Community 10. Plants of the Mesohaline/Oligohaline Subtidal Aquatic Bed 11. Plants of the Low Marsh Community 12. Plants of the High Marsh Community 13. Plants of the Brackish Tidal Marsh Community 14. Plants of the Freshwater Tidal Wetland Community 15. Plants of the Coastal Interdunal Marsh Community 16. Plants of the Coastal Plain Intermittent Pond Community 17. Plants of the Coastal Plain Atlantic White Cedar Swamp Community 18. Plants of the Liquidambar/Acer Hardwood Swamp Community 19. Plants of the Pine Barren Hardwood Swamp Community 20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mid-Atlantic Tidal Rapid Assessment Mullica River and Dennis Creek
    Mid-Atlantic Tidal Rapid Assessment 2014 Update Mullica River and Dennis Creek Mid Atlantic Coastal Wetland Assessment Coastal Mid Atlantic Winter 2015 Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Mid-Atlantic Tidal Rapid Assessment 2014 Update: Mullica River and Dennis Creek, New Jersey Partnership for the Delaware Estuary with The Barnegat Bay Partnership The Partnership for the Delaware Estuary is a nonprofit organization established in 1996 to take a leadership role in protecting and enhancing the Delaware Estuary, where fresh water from the Delaware River mixes with salt wa- ter from the Atlantic Ocean. It is one of 28 Congressionally designated National Estuary Programs throughout the coastal United States working to improve the environmental health of the nation’s estuaries. Its staff works with partners in three states to increase awareness, understanding, and scientific knowledge about the Delaware Estuary, the region’s most important cultural, economic, and recreational resource. Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Mid-TRAM: Mullica & Dennis – 2015 2 Authors LeeAnn R. Haaf Jessie S. W. Buckner Martha Maxwell-Doyle Danielle A. Kreeger, Ph.D. Angela T. Padeletti Acknowledgments The authors are deeply grateful for the generous funding provided for this effort by multiple entities including the United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 2, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protec- tion Coastal Zone, and the National Estuary Program. Cover photographs of collecting Mid-TRAM data in the Mullica River watershed, just north of Atlantic City, NJ (skyline in background) and performing Mid-TRAM within a red cedar snag forest in Dennis Creek courtesy of Partnership for the Delaware Estuary 2014. Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Mid-TRAM: Mullica & Dennis – 2015 3 Contents Authors .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diamonds in the Sand
    I was hooked. A real treasure hunt. Following his directions, I made my way to the gift shops at Sunset Beach to learn more about the Cape May diamonds. There, I found faceted and mounted gems and books, including The Legend of the Cape May Diamond, by award- winning writer Trinka Hakes Noble. Just like real diamonds To the naked eye viewing a polished and faceted Cape May diamond, there is no distinguishable difference between it and a real diamond. Until modern gem scanning equipment was developed, they were passed along by unscrupulous vendors as genuine diamonds. As closely as I examined the stones, I could not tell the difference either. They sparkle as brilliantly as any engagement ring, but sadly, unlike true diamonds, have no substantial value. According to legend and local history, Cape May diamonds are pure quartz crystal, and look like clear pebbles along the beach. When wet, they are translucent in hues of white, beige and rose, polished smooth by the ocean waves and sand. Often mistaken for river-smoothed glass from New Jersey’s once-thriving glass manufacturing industry, BY LINDA BARRETT geologists claim the crystals are local in origin, washing out of nearby Pleistocene gravel deposits. They register an eight on the hardness scale. Claims are their source is over 200 miles away, in the upper reaches of the Delaware River. “The Cape May diamonds are the daughters of the river, linking the state’s past and present. These Diamonds in the Sand fragments of quartz rock have hidden in the river, plucked away from the Cape May Diamonds Dazzle Visitors mountains lining its banks,” says author Noble.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the Trenton, New Jersey August 1982
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DRAINAGE AREAS IN NEW JERSEY: DELAWARE RIVER BASIN AND STREAMS TRIBUTARY TO DELAWARE BAY By Anthony J. Velnich OPEN-FILE REPORT 82-572 Prepared in cooperation with the UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey August 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to District Chief, Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction--- - ---- -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 1 Determination of drainage areas 3 Explanation of tabular data- 3 References cited 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of Delaware River basin and Delaware Bay drainage divides in New Jersey 2 TABLES Table 1. Drainage areas at stream mouths in New Jersey, in the Delaware River basin, including tributaries to Delaware Bay 6 2.--Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware River- 15 3. Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware Bay 41 FACTORS FOR CONVERTING INCH-POUND UNITS TO INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM UNITS (SI) For those readers who may prefer to use the International System (SI) units rather than inch-pound units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI unit feet (ft) 0.3048 meters (m) miles (mi) 1 .609 kilometers (km) square miles 2.590 square kilometers (mi 2 ) (km 2 ) II ABSTRACT Drainage areas of New Jersey streams tributary to the Delaware River and Delaware Bay are listed for over 1,100 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CAPE MAY PENINSULA Is Not Like the Rest of New Jersey
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service THE CAPE MAY PENINSULA Is Not Like the Rest of New Jersey Fall migration of monarch butterflies Photographs: USFWS Unique Ecosystems Key Migratory Corridor If you have noticed something The Cape May Peninsula is well-known “different” about the Cape May as a migratory route for raptors such Peninsula, particularly in regard to as the sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter its vegetation types, of course you striatus), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), are right! The Cape May Peninsula and northern harrier (Circus cyaneus), is not like the rest of New Jersey. The as well as owl species in great numbers. primary reason is climatic: nestled at The peninsula’s western beaches within Piping plover chick low elevation between the Atlantic Delaware Bay provide the largest Ocean and the Delaware Bay, the spawning area for horseshoe crabs peninsula enjoys approximately 225 (Limulus polyphemus) in the world frost-free days at its southern tip and, as a result, sustain a remarkable compared to 158 days at its northern portion of the second largest spring end. The vegetation, showing strong concentration of migrating shorebirds characteristics of the Pinelands flora in in North America. The increasingly the northern portion of the peninsula, rare red knot (Calidris canutus; a displays closer affinities to the mixed candidate for federal listing) as well hardwood forest of our country’s as the sanderling (C. alba), least southern Coastal Plain. Southern tree sandpiper (C. minutilla), dowitcher species such as the swamp chestnut oak (Limnodromus spp.), and ruddy (Quercus michauxii) and loblolly pine turnstone (Arenaria interpres) are (Pinus taeda) reach their northernmost some of the many bird species that distribution in Cape May County, while feed on horseshoe crab eggs to gain the common Pinelands trees such as weight for migration to their summer Swamp pink pitch pine (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
    Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Exposures
    Searching for the Pliocene: Southern Exposures Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center The 2012 Desert Research Symposium April 2012 Table of contents Searching for the Pliocene: Field trip guide to the southern exposures Field trip day 1 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Robert E. Reynolds, editor Field trip day 2 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19 George T. Jefferson, David Lynch, L. K. Murray, and R. E. Reynolds Basin thickness variations at the junction of the Eastern California Shear Zone and the San Bernardino Mountains, California: how thick could the Pliocene section be? ��������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Victoria Langenheim, Tammy L. Surko, Phillip A. Armstrong, Jonathan C. Matti The morphology and anatomy of a Miocene long-runout landslide, Old Dad Mountain, California: implications for rock avalanche mechanics �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Kim M. Bishop The discovery of the California Blue Mine ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Rick Kennedy Geomorphic evolution of the Morongo Valley, California ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 Frank Jordan, Jr. New records
    [Show full text]
  • Cape May County Voter Registration
    Cape May County A Profile of Cape May County New Jersey Avalon ● Cape May ● Cape May Court House ● Cape May Point ● Dennis Township ● Lower Township ● Middle Township ● North Wildwood ● Ocean City ● Sea Isle City ● Stone Harbor ● Upper Township ● West Cape May ● West Wildwood ● Wildwood ● Wildwood Crest ● Woodbine Table of Contents Overview and Geographical Background ..................................................................................................... 3 Housing Density........................................................................................................................................ 4 Transportation ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Public Transportation ............................................................................................................................ 5 County Road Mileage ........................................................................................................................... 6 Commute: Travel Time to Work ........................................................................................................... 7 Demographics ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Population (2010) ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Race (2010) ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice to Bidders 2019 Road Program-Phase 1 for Kechemeche Street, Pakahake Street, Pontaxit Avenue and Mathemek Street
    NOTICE TO BIDDERS 2019 ROAD PROGRAM-PHASE 1 FOR KECHEMECHE STREET, PAKAHAKE STREET, PONTAXIT AVENUE AND MATHEMEK STREET Notice is hereby given that sealed proposals will be received by Margaret Vitelli, Township of Lower Purchasing Agent, Cape May County, New Jersey for the 2019 Road Program-Phase 1 opened and read in public at the Township of Lower Municipal Building, 2600 Bayshore Road, Villas, Cape May County, New Jersey on March 12, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. prevailing time for: 2019 ROAD PROGRAM-PHASE 1 FOR KECHEMECHE STREET, PAKAHAKE STREET, PONTAXIT AVENUE AND MATHEMEK STREET Bid Documents and Drawings for the proposed work, which have been prepared by DeBlasio & Associates, P.C., are available at the office of said Engineer at 4701 New Jersey Avenue, Wildwood, New Jersey 08260, and may be inspected by prospective bidders during business hours. Bidders will be furnished with a copy of the Bid Documents by request upon proper notice and payment of a non-refundable charge of $75.00 payable to DeBlasio & Associates, P.C., for reproduction and processing. Proposals must be made on the standard Proposal Forms in the manner designated in the Bid Documents, must be enclosed in sealed envelopes bearing the name and address of the Bidder, and the name of the work on the outside addressed to Purchasing Agent, Township of Lower; and must be accompanied by a statement of Consent of Surety from a surety company authorized to do business in the State of New Jersey and acceptable to the Township and either a Bid Bond, Certified or Cashier’s Check drawn to the order of the Township of Lower for not less than ten percent (10%) of the amount bid, except that the check need not exceed $20,000.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape May County Tourism Conference
    2013 Cape May County Tourism Conference Developing a Game Plan – Lessons Learned from Sandy Presented by Cape May County Board of Chosen Freeholders Gerald M. Thornton, Director Leonard C. Desiderio, Vice Director Kristine Gabor Will Morey Cape May County Department of Tourism E. Marie Hayes Diane F. Wieland, Director [email protected] April 25, 2013 0 Developing a game plan – Lessons learned from Sandy 2012 represents 18 straight years of tourism growth for Cape May County Jersey Strong - For many who were left to clean up the mess left by Superstorm Sandy, the event will become a benchmark for telling time – What happened before Sandy and what happened after Sandy. Reports of changes in the landscape of the Jersey Shore were predicted and as we all move forward we will see some subtle – and many major – differences along the New Jersey coastline. Change for whatever reason is usually good and often unplanned. In the end, the four counties that make up the 127 miles of New Jersey coast and generate $19 Billion in expenditures will be a better place to live and visit. The more noticeable and tangible landscape changes will be north of Atlantic County but new regulations; mandated changes in building codes and revised FEMA flood maps will make a difference in the southern coastal towns as well. The looming changes will have its greatest impact on the real estate market that was beginning to show some positive movement after the recession. Cape May County dodged the bullet, this time. The next storm of the century could be just around the corner.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Still Here!
    We Are Still Here! The Tribal Saga of New Jersey’s Nanticoke and Lenape Indians John R. Norwood Native New Jersey Publications Copyright 2007 © by the Rev. Dr. John R. Norwood All Rights Reserved* Native New Jersey Publications P.O. Box 401 Moorestown, New Jersey 08057 In Partnership With The Nanticoke Lenni-Lenape Indian Tribe 18 East Commerce Street Bridgeton, New Jersey 08302 * Permission is granted to freely share this edition and its previous “pre-release version”in their downloadable electronic format, which are available on the internet from www.NativeNewJersey.org and www.Nanticoke-Lenape.info 2 We Are Still Here! The Tribal Saga of New Jersey’s Nanticoke and Lenape Indians John R. Norwood Native New Jersey Publications 3 To my father, whose name I gladly bear… May I honor you and all of my ancestors To my children… May my generation leave a legacy you are proud to build upon In praise of the Great Warrior and Chief of Heaven, Jesus Christ, Son of the Creator, Savior of my soul 4 Preface Much more can be said, and has been said, about the history of the Nanticoke and Lenape people who are now spread throughout North America. However, my task is to provide a brief, but comprehensive, summary of the historical information pertaining to the Nanticoke and Lenape people remaining in three interrelated tribal communities in Southern New Jersey and Delaware, with particular emphasis on how the legacy of the Lenape and Nanticoke ancestors in each community continues among the people called “Nanticoke Lenni-Lenape Indians”in New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Inventory
    NNAATTUURRAALL RREESSOOUURRCCEESS IINNVVEENNTTOORRYY TTOWNSHIP OF MMIDDLE CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY November 2007 Adopted by the Middle Township Planning Board on _____________________________ Maser Consulting PA American Metro Center 100 American Metro Boulevard Suite 152 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Natural Resources Inventory Middle Township Cape May County, New Jersey November 2007 Prepared by: Barbara Edelhauser, Environmental Scientist William Olson, Environmental Scientist Loren Kelly, Environmental Specialist Jacqueline McCort, Environmental Specialist Sharon White, Cultural Resources Specialist Jill Slagle, Cultural Resources Specialist Christopher Walker, Cultural Resources Specialist Marcia Shiffman, AICP, PP, CLA, Project Manager Daniel Bloch, Planner Maser Consulting PA American Metro Center 100 American Metro Boulevard Suite 152 Hamilton, NJ 08619 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................I 1.0 LOCATION.......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 MIDDLE TOWNSHIP LOCATION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 REGULATORY JURISDICTIONS............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 EXISTING LAND USE AND LAND COVER................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 61661147.Pdf
    Resource Inventory of Marine and Estuarine Fishes of the West Coast and Alaska: A Checklist of North Pacific and Arctic Ocean Species from Baja California to the Alaska–Yukon Border OCS Study MMS 2005-030 and USGS/NBII 2005-001 Project Cooperation This research addressed an information need identified Milton S. Love by the USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and the Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara to the Department University of California of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service, Pacific Santa Barbara, CA 93106 OCS Region, Camarillo, California. The resource inventory [email protected] information was further supported by the USGS’s National www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Biological Information Infrastructure as part of its ongoing aquatic GAP project in Puget Sound, Washington. Catherine W. Mecklenburg T. Anthony Mecklenburg Report Availability Pt. Stephens Research Available for viewing and in PDF at: P. O. Box 210307 http://wfrc.usgs.gov Auke Bay, AK 99821 http://far.nbii.gov [email protected] http://www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Lyman K. Thorsteinson Printed copies available from: Western Fisheries Research Center Milton Love U. S. Geological Survey Marine Science Institute 6505 NE 65th St. University of California, Santa Barbara Seattle, WA 98115 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] (805) 893-2935 June 2005 Lyman Thorsteinson Western Fisheries Research Center Much of the research was performed under a coopera- U. S. Geological Survey tive agreement between the USGS’s Western Fisheries
    [Show full text]