Wolf River Greenway Level 1 Arboretum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Wolf River Greenway Level 1 Arboretum Map Created by: W. Ryan Hall, Wolf River Conservancy d & R Shelby County 4-H ve August, 2014 _ ro G t u n al W 19 18 W O 17 20 L 21 F 22 R I H V u m 24 23 E p 16 R h 25 r e 26 y s 27 B 28 lv d 29 15 30 31 14 33 32 13 12 11 9 8 7 6 5 34 4 H u m 35 p h re y s B 36 lv d 3 !i 2 ® 1 37 0 175 350 700 Feet 38 1 inch = 350 feet Wolf River Greenway Arboretum Number Common Name Scientific Name Family Name 1 Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana Cupressaceae - Cypress Family 2 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Rosaceae - Rose Family 3 Silver Maple Acer saccharinum Aceraceae - Maple Family 4 Green Ash Fraxinus pensylvanica Oleaceae - Olive Family 5 Sugarberry Celtis laevigata Ulmaceae - Elm Family 6 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Platanaceae - Sycamore Family 7 Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra Ulmaceae - Elm Family 8 Boxelder Acer negundo Aceraceae - Maple Family 9 Baldcypress Taxodium distichum Taxodiaceae - Baldcypress Family 10 Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida Cornaceae - Dogwood Family 11 Yellow-poplar Liriodendron tulipifera Magnoliaceae - Magnolia Family 12 Common Pawpaw Asimina triloba Annonaceae - Custard-Apple Family 13 River Birch Betula nigra Betulaceae - Birch Family 14 Red Mulberry Morus rubra Moraceae - Mulberry Family 15 Devils Walking Stick Aralia spinosa Araliaceae - Ivy Family 16 Black Tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Nyssaceae - Tupelo Family 17 American Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Hamamelidaceae - Witchhazel Family 18 Black Locust Robinia pseudoacacia Fabaceae - Legume Family 19 Japanese Zelkova Zelkova serrata Ulmaceae - Elm Family 20 American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Betulaceae - Birch Family 21 Shagbark Hickory Carya ovata Juglandaceae - Walnut Family 22 Shumard Oak Quercus shumardii Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 23 Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 24 Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 25 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra Juglandaceae - Walnut Family 26 Water Oak Quercus nigra Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 27 Willow Oak Quercus phellos Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 28 American Elm Ulmus americana Ulmaceae - Elm Family 29 Bradford Pear Pyrus calleryana Rosaceae - Rose Family 30 Black Willow Salix nigra Salicaceae - Willow Family 31 Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 32 Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos Fabaceae - Legume Family 33 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides Salicaceae - Willow Family 34 Sweetbay Magnolia Magnolia virginiana Magnoliaceae - Magnolia Family 35 Red Maple Acer rubrum Aceraceae - Maple Family 36 Common Persimmon Diospyros virginiana Ebenaceae - Ebony Family 37 Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata Fagaceae - Beech/Oak Family 38 Loblolly Pine Pinus taeda Pinaceae - Pine Family.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Survival and Initial Growth Attributes of Improved and Unimproved Cherrybark Oak in South Arkansas
SURVIVAL AND INITIAL GROWTH ATTRIBUTES OF IMPROVED AND UNIMPROVED CHERRYBARK OAK IN SOUTH ARKANSAS Joshua P. Adams, David Graves, Matthew H. Pelkki, Chris Stuhlinger, and Jon Barry1 Abstract--Thousands of acres are planted every year with genetically improved seedlings; but while pine continues to be extensively explored, the same is not true for hardwoods due to costs and rotation length. An improved cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seed orchard exists in North Little Rock, AR, providing an opportunity to evaluate hardwood improvement. However, the cost and limited testing of these seedlings have been large limiting factors in their deployment. In February 2012, improved and woods-run seedlings were hand-planted at two sites in southern Arkansas including a site near Hope, AR, and one near Monticello, AR. The sites were treated with 2 ounces per acre of Oust XP® 2 weeks after tree planting with manual control of sumac (Rhus spp.) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) shortly thereafter. A random sample of seedlings at the nursery confirmed that seedling undercutting effectively controlled root length which was statistically the same for both groups at 21.8 inches. However, root collar diameter of an improved seedling was on average 27 percent larger than an unimproved seedling. These trends were similar to those among planted seedlings in which improved seedlings were 9 percent and 8 percent greater in regards to ground line diameter and height, respectively. However, improved seedlings exhibited greater initial mortality, by 6.2 percent, in the first few months of their growing season. While initial mortality is often considered random, disparity between the two groups points to other causes, such as the larger root sizes, which may pose planting problems.
[Show full text]
Department of Planning and Zoning
Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
[Show full text]
Genetic Improvement and Root Pruning Effects on Cherrybark Oak (Quercus Pagoda L.) Seedling Growth and Survival in Southern Arkansas Joshua P
Genetic Improvement and Root Pruning Effects on Cherrybark Oak (Quercus Pagoda L.) Seedling Growth and Survival in Southern Arkansas Joshua P. Adams, Nicholas Mustoe, Don C. Bragg, Matthew H. Pelkki, and Victor L. Ford Associate Professor, School of Agricultural Sciences and Forestry, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA; Forester, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Fishlake National Forest, Richfield, UT; Research Forester and Project Leader, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Monticello, AR; Professor and Associate Director, Arkansas Forest Resources Center, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR; Director and Professor, Southwest Research and Extension Center, University of Arkansas Research and Extension, Little Rock, AR Abstract (Wharton et al. 1982). Among hardwoods, red oaks (Quercus subgroup Erythrobalanus) are ecologically Cherrybark oak is a highly desirable hardwood and economically valuable. Despite the high desir- species across the Southeastern United States. Sil- ability of red oaks, natural regeneration failures in vicultural techniques for establishment have been stands historically dominated by these oaks has been carefully studied, but advances in tree improvement well documented (Clatterbuck and Meadows 1992, have yet to be realized. Cherrybark oak seedlings of Hodges and Janzen 1987, Lorimer 1989, Oliver et al. genetically improved and unimproved stock were 2005). The lack of natural oak regeneration on many tested in field plantings in southern Arkansas and in sites has resulted in some landowners planting oaks a controlled pot study for root pruning effects. After to ensure this taxa remains viable for future genera- 2 years, initial growth advantages of improved stock tions, provides wildlife habitat, conserves the natu- were no longer present; however, improved stock ral environment, and produces high-value products averaged 19 percent higher survival compared with (Michler et al.
[Show full text]
Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
[Show full text]
Designing Hardwood Tree Plantings for Wildlife Brian J
FNR-213 Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University Designing Hardwood Tree Plantings for Wildlife Brian J. MacGowan, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University Woody plants can be of value to many wildlife species. The species of tree or shrub, or the location, size, and shape of planting can all have an impact on wildlife. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the benefits of trees and shrubs for wildlife and how to design tree and shrub plantings for wildlife. Some of the practices may conflict with other management goals and may have to be modified for individual priorities. Trees and Shrubs for Wildlife The species you select for a tree planting should depend on the growing conditions of the site and the wildlife species that you want to manage. Talk to a professional forester to help you select the tree species best suited for your growing conditions. A professional biologist, such as a Department of Natural Resources District Biologist (www.in.gov/ food source for wildlife (Table 2). Shrubs can be dnr/fishwild/huntguide1/wbiolo.htm), can assist you particularly important because several species of with planning a tree planting for wildlife. wildlife, especially songbirds, prefer to feed or nest There is no specific formula for developing wild- on or near the ground. Shrubs also provide good life habitat. For example, acorns are eaten by a wide protective cover for these types of wildlife. Pines variety of wildlife species including tree squirrels, and other softwoods provide limited food, but are an pheasants, wild turkey, and deer.
[Show full text]
Oaks for Nebraska Justin R
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Statewide Arboretum Publications Nebraska Statewide Arboretum 2013 Oaks for Nebraska Justin R. Evertson University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arboretumpubs Part of the Botany Commons, and the Forest Biology Commons Evertson, Justin R., "Oaks for Nebraska" (2013). Nebraska Statewide Arboretum Publications. 1. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arboretumpubs/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Statewide Arboretum at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Statewide Arboretum Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Oaks for Nebraska Justin Evertson, Nebraska Statewide Arboretum arboretum.unl.edu or retreenebraska.unl.edu R = belongs to red oak group—acorns mature over two seasons & leaves typically have pointed lobes. W = belongs to white oak group— acorns mature in one season & leaves typically have rounded lobes. Estimated size range is height x spread for trees growing in eastern Nebraska. A few places to see oaks: Indian Dwarf chinkapin oak, Quercus Cave State Park; Krumme Arboretum Blackjack oak, Quercus prinoides (W) in Falls City; Peru State College; marilandica (R) Variable habit from shrubby to Fontenelle Nature Center in Bellevue; Shorter and slower growing than tree form; prolific acorn producer; Elmwood Park in Omaha; Wayne most oaks with distinctive tri- can have nice yellow fall color; Park in Waverly; University of lobed leaves; can take on a very national champion grows near Nebraska Lincoln; Lincoln Regional natural look with age; tough and Salem Nebraska; 10-25’x 10-20’.
[Show full text]
Beneficial Trees for Wildlife Forestry and Plant Materials Technical Note
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Note No: TX-PM-16-01 August 2016 Beneficial Trees for Wildlife Forestry and Plant Materials Technical Note Background Trees provide shelter and food sources for a wide array of wildlife. White tail deer browse leaves and twigs along with acorns each fall and winter when other food sources are unavailable. More than 100 animal species eat acorns including rabbits, squirrels, wild hog, and gamebirds (Ober 2014). Songbirds and small mammals consume fruits and seeds. Wood peckers (Melanerpes sp.) and red tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicencis) nest in the cavities of hollow or dead trees (Dickson and Connor 1982). Butterflies, moths, and honeybees use trees as larval hosts, nectar sources, and shelter (Hill and Webster 1995). At right is a map illustrating forest types within the Western Gulf Coastal Plain. The Western Gulf Coastal Plain has a diversity of native hardwoods along with three species of southern pines (longleaf (Pinus palustris), shortleaf (Pinus echinata) and loblolly (Pinus taeda). Important native hardwoods used commercially and for wildlife include mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), black walnut (Juglans nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica), white oak (Quercus alba), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), water oak (Quercus nigra), willow oak (Quercus phellos), shumard oak (Quercus shumardii), post oak (Quercus stellata), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and American elm (Ulmus americana) (Diggs 2006). 1 Purpose The purpose of this technical note is to assist conservation planners and land managers by providing basic tree establishment information and a list of beneficial wildlife trees (Table 1) when they are planning wildlife and pollinator habitat in east Texas, western Louisiana, southwestern Arkansas, and southeastern Oklahoma.
[Show full text]
Quercus ×Coutinhoi Samp. Discovered in Australia Charlie Buttigieg
XXX International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society …the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 1 International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society … the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 International Oak Society Officers and Board of Directors 2012-2015 Officers President Béatrice Chassé (France) Vice-President Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Belgium) Secretary Gert Fortgens (The Netherlands) Treasurer James E. Hitz (USA) Board of Directors Editorial Committee Membership Director Chairman Emily Griswold (USA) Béatrice Chassé Tour Director Members Shaun Haddock (France) Roderick Cameron International Oaks Allen Coombes Editor Béatrice Chassé Shaun Haddock Co-Editor Allen Coombes (Mexico) Eike Jablonski (Luxemburg) Oak News & Notes Ryan Russell Editor Ryan Russell (USA) Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven International Editor Roderick Cameron (Uruguay) Website Administrator Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven For contributions to International Oaks contact Béatrice Chassé [email protected] or [email protected] 0033553621353 Les Pouyouleix 24800 St.-Jory-de-Chalais France Author’s guidelines for submissions can be found at http://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/author-guidelines-journal-ios © 2014 International Oak Society Text, figures, and photographs © of individual authors and photographers. Graphic design: Marie-Paule Thuaud / www.lecentrecreatifducoin.com Photos. Cover: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Quercus macrocalyx Hickel & A. Camus); p. 6: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Q. oxyodon Miq.); p. 7: Béatrice Chassé (Q. acerifolia (E.J. Palmer) Stoynoff & W. J. Hess); p. 9: Eike Jablonski (Q. ithaburensis subsp.
[Show full text]
University of Tennessee Instructor Copy
Copy This chapter is an edited version An Overview of the Physical of a manuscript by the same title Environment, Flora, and written by Edward W. Chester. Vegetation of Tennessee In addition to editing, some 2 material has been deleted from and some added to the original Instructormanuscript by the editors of this publication. Portions of the original manuscript were condensed from Guide to the Vascular Plants of Tennessee, compiled and edited by the Tennessee Flora Committee. Copyright © 2015 by The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. Used by permission granted to Edward W. Chester. See author’s notes for additional Tennessee information. of University Copy AUTHOR'S NOTES A more complete discussion of the topics in this chapter can be found in Chapter 1, “The Physical Environment of Tennessee” (written by Edward W. Chester) and Chapter 3, ”An Overview of the Vegetation of Tennessee” (coauthored by Hal R. DeSelm and William H. Martin) in the Guide to the Vascular Plants of Tennessee referenced at the beginning of this chapter. The contents of the two chapters are based on almost 200 combined years of study by the three authors and the nearly 100 references they cite. The authors are: Instructor Edward W. Chester, Professor Emeritus of Biology and Botany, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tenn. Hal R. DeSelm (deceased), Professor Emeritus of Botany and the Graduate Program in Ecology, University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Dr. DeSelm died on July 12, 2011. William H. Martin, Professor Emeritus of Biology and Director of the Division of Natural Areas, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond. He served as Commissioner of Kentucky's Department for Natural Resources from 1992 to 1998.
[Show full text]
Key to Leaves of Eastern Native Oaks
FHTET-2003-01 January 2003 Front Cover: Clockwise from top left: white oak (Q. alba) acorns; willow oak (Q. phellos) leaves and acorns; Georgia oak (Q. georgiana) leaf; chinkapin oak (Q. muehlenbergii) acorns; scarlet oak (Q. coccinea) leaf; Texas live oak (Q. fusiformis) acorns; runner oak (Q. pumila) leaves and acorns; background bur oak (Q. macrocarpa) bark. (Design, D. Binion) Back Cover: Swamp chestnut oak (Q. michauxii) leaves and acorns. (Design, D. Binion) FOREST HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE TEAM TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Oak Identification Field Guide to Native Oak Species of Eastern North America John Stein and Denise Binion Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team USDA Forest Service 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV 26505 Robert Acciavatti Forest Health Protection Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry USDA Forest Service 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV 26505 United States Forest FHTET-2003-01 Department of Service January 2003 Agriculture NORTH AMERICA 100th Meridian ii iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank all those who helped with this publication. We are grateful for permission to use the drawings illustrated by John K. Myers, Flagstaff, AZ, published in the Flora of North America, North of Mexico, vol. 3 (Jensen 1997). We thank Drs. Cynthia Huebner and Jim Colbert, U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Disturbance Ecology and Management of Oak-Dominated Forests, Morgantown, WV; Dr. Martin MacKenzie, U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection, Morgantown, WV; Dr. Steven L. Stephenson, Department of Biology, Fairmont State College, Fairmont, WV; Dr. Donna Ford-Werntz, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Dr.
[Show full text]
Follow This Link for a Greenway Arboretum Map and Species List
Wolf River Greenway Level 1 Arboretum d R ve ro G t u n al W 18 17 W O 16 19 L 20 F 21 R I H V u m 23 22 E p 24 15 R h r 25 e y s 26 B 27 lv d 28 14 29 30 13 32 31 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 33 4 H u m 34 p h re y s B 35 lv d 3 !i 2 ® 1 36 0 175 350 700 Feet 37 1 inch = 350 feet Map ID Common Name Scientific Name Family Name 1 Eastern Redcedar Juniperus virginiana Cupressaceae - Cypress Family 2 Black Cherry Prunus serotina Rosaceae - Rose Family 3 Silver Maple Acer saccharinum Aceraceae - Maple Family 4 Green Ash Fraxinus pensylvanica Oleaceae - Olive Family 5 Sugarberry Celtis laevigata Ulmaceae - Elm Family 6 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Platanaceae - Sycamore Family 7 Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra Ulmaceae - Elm Family 8 Boxelder Acer negundo Aceraceae - Maple Family 9 Baldcypress Taxodium distichum Taxodiaceae - Baldcypress Family 10 Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida Cornaceae - Dogwood Family 11 Yellow-poplar Liriodendron tulipifera Magnoliaceae - Magnolia Family 12 River Birch Betula nigra Betulaceae - Birch Family 13 Red Mulberry Morus rubra Moraceae - Mulberry Family 14 Devils Walking Stick Aralia spinosa Araliaceae - Ivy Family 15 Black Tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Nyssaceae - Tupelo Family 16 American Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Hamamelidaceae - Witchhazel Family 17 Black Locust Robinia pseudoacacia Fabaceae - Legume Family 18 Japanese Zelkova Zelkova serrata Ulmaceae - Elm Family 19 American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Betulaceae - Birch Family 20 Shagbark Hickory Carya ovata Juglandaceae - Walnut Family 21 Shumard Oak Quercus shumardii
[Show full text]
Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 ON THE COVER Duck potato (Sagittaria latifolia) at Ocmulgee National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, Georgia 30605 September 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
[Show full text]