Spirituality and Cultism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SPIRITUALITY AND CULTISM: A CASE STUDY OF A NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT – THE MAGNIFICAT MEAL MOVEMENT MIKE GARDE M.A. IN THEOLOGY 2006 MILLTOWN INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY SPIRITUALITY AND CULTISM: A CASE STUDY OF A NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT – THE MAGNIFICAT MEAL MOVEMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THEOLOGY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF M.A. IN THEOLOGY MIKE GARDE BD, H. Dip Ed. DIRECTED BY DR JACK FINNEGAN DD DUBLIN JUNE 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS i-iii Acknowledgements iv Statement of Originality v Abstract vi Ethical Statement vii Title: SPIRITUALITY AND CULTISM: viii A CASE STUDY OF A NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT – THE MAGNIFICAT MEAL MOVEMENT Chapter One: THE JOURNEY 1 1.1 Introduction 2 1.1.1 My Journey – Spiritual Aspects 6 1.1.2 Professional Aspect 9 1.1.3 Academic Aspect 9 1.1.4 The Definitional Problem 12 1.1.5 Focus of this Thesis 13 1.1.6 Structure of the Thesis 14 Chapter Two: NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS, CULTS AND SECTS: WHAT DO WE CALL THEM? 17 2.1 Cults: What’s in a Name? 18 2.2 Theological Definitions 20 2.2.1 Cardinal Francis Arinze’s View 21 2.2.2 Cardinal Christoph Schönborn’s View 23 2.2.3 The Continuing Terminological Debate 24 2.3 Psychological Definitions 26 2.3.1 The International Cultic Studies Association – (ICSA) View 27 2.3.2 Marc Galanter’s View 31 2.4 Sociological Definitions 33 2.4.1 Jeff Hadden’s View 34 2.4.2 The Sociological Views of the ICSA 37 2.4.3 Eileen Barker and the Term NRM 38 2.4.4 Massimo Introvigne & Gianni Ambrosio’s Views 39 2.5 Summarising the Literature 40 i 2.6 Cultism 41 Chapter Three: THE HISTORY OF THE MMM 44 3.1 Origins 45 3.1.1 Review of Literature 46 3.1.2 Aims 47 3.2 A Biographical Note 48 3.2.1 The Early Years 48 3.2.2 The Practices at Toowoomba 52 3.2.3 Developments in Queensland 54 3.3 The Laurentin Episode 58 3.4 The Changing Relationship with the Catholic Church 60 3.5 Decline 64 3.5.1 Debra and the MMM’s Widening Civil Conflict 66 3.5.2 The Mansour Dossier 69 3.5.3 Strange Incidents 72 Chapter Four: THE MMM IN IRELAND 74 4.1 Beginnings in Ireland 75 4.1.1 Review of Literature 75 4.1.2 The Importance of Medjugorje 76 4.1.3 First Encounters 77 4.1.4 Late Arrival 77 4.1.5 Developments 79 4.1.6 Growth 83 4.1.7 The End of Dialogue 84 4.1.8 Decline 89 4.1.9 The beginning of the End 90 4.2 The MMM in Ireland 2000-2006 95 4.2.1 The Underground “Catholic” Church 95 4.2.2 Liveline with Joe Duffy 96 4.2.3 Another Underground Visit 100 4.2.4 Demands from Debra 101 4.2.5 Departures and Arrivals 102 4.3 Conclusion 104 ii Chapter Five: THE MMM A CULTIST NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT? 107 5.1 Introduction 108 5.1.1 Theology: Conventional Pieties and Enthusiastic Spirituality 108 5.1.2 Debra’s Spirituality 109 5.1.2.1 Signs and Wonders – Healings and Thaumaturgical Powers 110 5.1.2.2 Biblical and Prophetic Piety 111 5.1.3 Traditionalism 112 5.1.4 Eucharistic and Marian Devotion 114 5.1.5 Heterodoxy 126 5.2 Psychological Dimensions of Cultism within the MMM 128 5.2.1 Conversion – Entry and Exit 129 5.3 The Sociological Dimensions of Cultism 132 5.3.1 Conversionist 134 5.3.2 Revolutionist (or Transformative) 135 5.3.3 Introversionist 135 5.3.4 Manipulationist (or Magical) 135 5.3.5 Thaumaturgical (or Miraculous) and Reformist 136 5.3.6 Utopian 136 5.3.7 The Wilson Typology: Further Considerations 137 5.3.8 The Lewis View 138 5.4 Movement-Sect-Cultist NRM 139 Chapter Six: CONCLUSIONS 143 6.1 Introduction 144 6.1.1 Christian Responses 147 6.1.2 The Emerging Challenge of Fundamentalism 149 6.1.3 The Theological Implications 152 Audiography 154 Bibliography 155 Netography 161 Videography 163 Appendix 164 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge and thank a number of people. First there is my wife Meriel and my daughter Caroline, who have had to hear the mantra “The Masters” for the past four years. They have dealt with my monomania with love and support. Louis Hughes OP who was formerly the chairperson of Dialogue Ireland was also my supervisor for the first two years of my studies, until ill health necessitated him discontinuing this role. He was a great support to me while I was a research MA student and Chapter Two shows his influence on my reflections on the term a cultist NRM . Then to the registrar of the Milltown Institute, Bernadette Flanagan, a special word of thanks for seeking me out to stretch the mind after nearly thirty years absence from the academic world. She was always available, a friend and guide on this rocky road. A major word of thanks is owing to Jack Finnegan for taking over as director from Louis and his unflinching support in getting me to the finishing line. He had a wonderful ability to encourage me in my research, with various books, articles, and tamed my jagged expression into a polished prose. Thanks are also due to Chris O’ Donnell for his advice in the field of Mariology. The amendments proposed by the external and internal examiners Jim Mc Cormack, and Thomas Grenham added clarity and perspicuity to the final text. To all the staff at the Milltown Institute who helped in the lonely path of being a research student many thanks for all the little things that made for a successful conclusion. A special word of thanks to Helen Manning in this regard. It was pleasant to join other students when earlier in my studies I took part in selected courses. Thanks are also due to Helen Carr for proof-reading my text. Also to all my friends in Dialogue Ireland who have supported me in a similarly lonely journey in ministering in the Cultist NRM field a big thank you. Finally as part of the study of spirituality I have been blessed by a deepening in my understanding of God and the reality that underneath are the everlasting arms. To God be the glory. iv STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY DECLARATION The views presented in this thesis are the findings of the candidate. All sources employed have been acknowledged. ______________________________ Candidate ______________________________ Director v ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned with the distinguishing characteristics of cultist NRMs. The Magnificat Meal Movement (MMM) is the particular focus through which this is done. Chapter One is introductory in nature and outlines the task of the different chapters and their development. The spiritual, professional, and academic aspects relevant to the topic are integrated. Chapter Two investigates and evaluates the question of terminology and its classification. Oriented by methodological developments in spirituality and practical theology, this chapter uses an interdisciplinary approach to critically review what scholars in the field are saying. A new definition of cultist NRMs is advanced. This necessitates a move away from identifying groups or persons allegedly involved in cults in favour of the recognition of patterns of behaviour and human mentalities called cultist tendencies or attitudes that can be clearly identified and analysed. This new approach has clear pastoral, spiritual and theological advantages. Chapter Three is contextual in nature. It traces the origins and development of the MMM and its foundress Debra Geileskey in Australia. While this is done in a chronological fashion, the chapter is concerned to identify the underlying religious patterns that come to characterise the MMM. The conflation of the person of Debra with the MMM will be evidenced. Chapter Four examines the history of the MMM in Ireland using the same methodology as in Chapter Three. Patterns of growth and decline will also be traced. Chapter Five takes up the task of critical evaluation and asks the question: is the MMM a cultist NRM ? Chapter Six draws the conclusions about the MMM together, and identifies it clearly as a cultist NRM . Specific recommendations for those involved with NRMs are proposed. Areas for further study and issues that need to be addressed by the Churches and the Irish State in relation to NRMs are identified. vi ETHICAL STATEMENT The ethical conduct of this study in fulfilment of the requirements for an M.A. in theology is based on the Research Ethics of the Code of Ethics and Regulations of the Milltown Institute. Most of those who were interviewed gave permission for their names to be used in the research. Three persons who wished to remain anonymous gave interviews. These were recorded in such a manner as to ensure full confidentiality and security. Letters of the alphabet were employed to protect their anonymity. All gave written consent including those interviewed in Australia in 2003 when I did field work in Helidon, the present location of the MMM. Because of the closed nature of the MMM my attempts to obtain interviews there, especially with the Irish members, were rebuffed. I made one last effort to ensure academic balance by emailing Claire Murphy and Debra in early April 2006 offering to give them access to my research. I received no reply. All the participants gave an informed consent and were made aware of the full list of their rights and ethical rules such as the right to withdraw from the research at any time.