DOCSLIB.ORG

Download.Glowa-Jordan-River.Com/Final Conference Cyprus 2011/3 Researchhighlights/3 Hydrology Khlaifat, A., Hogan, M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download.Glowa-Jordan-River.Com/Final Conference Cyprus 2011/3 Researchhighlights/3 Hydrology Khlaifat, A., Hogan, M Chapter 6 Jordan River Basin INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA (ONLINE VERSION) How to cite UN-ESCWA and BGR (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia; Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe). 2013. Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia. Beirut. CHAPTER 6 - JORDAN RIVER BASIN Jordan River Basin The Jordan River at one of its narrowest points, Jordan, 1992. Source: Ed Kashi/VII. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Originating from the Anti-Lebanon and Mount Lake Tiberias remains nearly natural, Hermon mountain ranges, the Jordan River but flow rates in the downstream part of covers a distance of 223 km from north to south the river have decreased sharply in the last and discharges into the Dead Sea. The river has 50 years due to the construction of a series five riparians: Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine of infrastructure and diversion schemes and Syria. established in the basin. For instance, the mean annual historic flow of the Yarmouk that was The Jordan River headwaters (Hasbani, Banias estimated at 450-500 MCM in the 1950s has and Dan) are fed by groundwater and seasonal today decreased to 83-99 MCM. The current surface runoff. The Lower Jordan River originally annual discharge of the Lower Jordan River received its main inflow from the outlet of Lake into the Dead Sea is estimated at 20-200 MCM Tiberias and the Yarmouk River, the largest compared to the historic 1,300 MCM. Moreover, tributary, as well as from several wadis and water quality in the Lower Jordan River is aquifers. The flow of the Upper Jordan River into very low. 170 INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA - PART I Water use in the Jordan River basin is unevenly The quality of water in the Jordan River has developed. Palestine and Syria have no access severely deteriorated in recent decades. While to the Jordan River; hence their use of water the headwaters are relatively unaffected, resources from the river itself is nil. However, the Lower Jordan River consists primarily of Syria has built several dams in the Yarmouk untreated sewage and agricultural return flows, River sub-basin, which is part of the Jordan groundwater seepage, as well as brackish River basin. The country uses about 450 MCM/yr water from springs diverted into the river away of surface and groundwater resources in the from the Lake Tiberias area. The Lower Jordan basin, mainly for agricultural purposes. Annual River in particular is extremely polluted. Other abstractions in the Hasbani sub-basin in environmental concerns include water-level Lebanon are estimated at 9-10 MCM, which are fluctuations in Lake Tiberias and the associated mainly used for domestic water supply. Israel is risk of saline water intrusion from below, and, the largest user of water from the Jordan River more importantly, the decline of the Dead Sea, basin, with an annual withdrawal of between which all threaten the stability of the basin 580 and 640 MCM. It is also the only user of ecosystem. water from Lake Tiberias. Jordan uses about 290 MCM/yr of water from the Jordan River Since the early 20th century, numerous attempts basin. Water diverted from the Yarmouk River to foster cooperation between basin riparians to the King Abdullah Canal is used for irrigation have been hampered by the regional political of crops in the Jordan Valley and for domestic conflict which continues to stand in the way of use in Amman. Overall, the Jordan River basin any basin-wide agreement on water. A number has an estimated total irrigated area of 100,000- of bilateral agreements encourage cooperation 150,000 ha of which around 30% is located in over water between Israel and Jordan, and Israel, Jordan and Syria, 5% in Palestine and 2% Israel and Palestine. in Lebanon. The Dead Sea, Jordan, 2010. Source: Martin Schäfer. 171 CHAPTER 6 - JORDAN RIVER BASIN BASIN FACTS RIPARIAN COUNTRIES Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria BASIN AREAS SHARES Israel 10%, Jordan 40%, Lebanon 4%, Palestine 9%, Syria 37% BASIN AREA 18,285 km2 RIVER LENGTH 223 km Natural conditions (1950s) Upper Jordan River: 605 MCM Yarmouk River: 450-500 MCM Lower Jordan River: 1,300 MCM MEAN ANNUAL FLOW VOLUME Current conditions Upper Jordan River: 616 MCM Yarmouk River: 83-99 MCM Lower Jordan River: 20-200 MCM MAIN DAMS 45 (max. storage capacity ~390 MCM) PROJECTED IRRIGATED AREA 100,000-150,000 ha BASIN POPULATION 7.18 million MAIN AGREEMENTS 1953 and 1987 – On the use of the Yarmouk River, including the construction of JORDAN - SYRIA the Wahdah Dam and 25 dams in Syria. The agreement also establishes a joint commission for the implementation of the provisions on the Wahdah Dam. 1994 – Annex II of the Treaty of Peace concerns water allocation and storage of the ISRAEL - JORDAN Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers, and calls for efforts to prevent water pollution as well as the establishment of a Joint Water Committee. 1995 – Article 40 of the Oslo II political agreement states that Israel recognizes ISRAEL - PALESTINE Palestinian water rights in the West Bank only and establishes the Joint Water (PLO) Committee to manage West Bank waters and develop new supplies. Palestinians are denied access to the Jordan River under this agreement. KEY CONCERNS WATER QUANTITY Ensuring adequate quantities of water for all riparians is a key challenge in the basin given the relatively small volume of water available and the large population. River flow has been greatly reduced over the years as a result of increased exploitation of water resources in the basin. The rapid decline of the Dead Sea is an indicator that the region’s ecosystem is at risk. WATER QUALITY Water quality rapidly deteriorates along the course of the Jordan River and its lower portion displays extremely high salinity and pollution rates. GEOPOLITICAL The question of water sharing in the Jordan River basin is inextricably linked to the ongoing conflicts between Israel and Syria, Israel and Lebanon, and Israel and Palestine, and while a wide range of issues are at stake, control over water in the basin has added to existing regional tensions. 172 INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA - PART I Al Labweh OVERVIEW MAP Baalbek 35°E 36°E Georgia !H Armenia Azerbaijan Beirut Zahle Turkey Iran Syria Lebanon Litani Iraq Sidon Lake Qaraoun Jordan !H Kuwait L e b a n o n Damascus Hasbani Saudi Arabia Hasbaya E Nabatiye Mount Hermon Litani Ain Chebaa Tyre Wazzaniµ Dan Mediterranean Sea Hula Wadi ¸ Sede Nehemia Banias Raqqad Quneytra ¸ $ 33°N Kudnah S y r i a 33°N Ghadir al Bustan$ Jordan Jisr al Tabgha $ Allan Tasil Lake Raqqad $ Yarmouk Tiberias $ Saham al Golan $Wadi Adwan sub-basin $ $ Sheikh Miskin Abidin Haifa Tiberias $ ¸ Arram Room$ Jawlayeen Nazareth $ Wadi As Suwayda Degania Dhahab Yarmouk $ Nahal ¸ YarmoukWahdah Wadi Wadi Arab I s r a e l Tavor¸ $ Dar'a Ghariyah al Sharqiyah $ Wadi Nahal Wadi Arab Irbid Wadi $ Dar'a East Zaydi Harod Wadi Ziqleb Sahwat al Khidr Shallala Jenin $ Sama al Sirhan Carrier Ajloun Mafraq Water Tulkarm Abdullah Canal Jerash King National Nablus Jordan El Fara Zarqa $ P a l e s t i n e King Talal (West Bank) Zarqa Tel Aviv-Yafo Salt $Karameh 32°N Amman 32°N Shuayb !H Ramallah Wadi Ramla Jericho $ Azraq Kafrein !H Jerusalem Madaba Bethlehem J o r d a n Wala$ Gaza City Hebron D e a d Wala Wadi Mujib Mujib S e a Wadi $ An Nabk Be'er Sheva Karak Araba 31°N Wadi Hassan 31°N Wadi 0 12.5 25 50 75 100 km Jordan River Basin At Tafilah International boundary River $ Dam Armistice Demarcation Line Intermittent river, wadi¸ MonitorinG station !H Capital Canal, irriGation tunnel Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia Selected city, town Freshwater lake Disclaimer Basin boundary µ SprinG The desiGnations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat Main shared sub-basin boundary E Mountain of the United Nations concerninG the leGal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its auhorities, or Zone of aGricultural development concerninG the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © UN-ESCWA - BGR Beirut 2013 173 CHAPTER 6 - JORDAN RIVER BASIN CONTENTS GEOGRAPHY 177 River course 177 Climate 178 Population 179 HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 180 Headwaters of the Upper Jordan River 181 Upper Jordan River 184 The Yarmouk River 187 Lower Jordan River 189 Flow regime regulation in the Jordan River basin 191 WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 192 Development & use: Lebanon 194 Development & use: Syria 196 Development & use: Israel 197 Development & use: Jordan 201 Development & use: Palestine 202 Water quality & environmental issues 204 AGREEMENTS, COOPERATION & OUTLOOK 210 Agreements: Jordan & Syria 210 Agreements: Israel & Palestine 211 Agreements: Israel & Jordan 212 Cooperation: Jordan & Syria 212 Cooperation: Israel & Palestine 212 Cooperation: Israel & Jordan 212 Outlook 213 NOTES 214 BIBLIOGRAPHY 217 174 INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA - PART I FIGURES FIGURE 1. Sketch of the Jordan-Yarmouk River System 177 FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Jordan River basin area 177 FIGURE 3. Mean monthly climate diagrams for Amman, Jordan, and Jerusalem 178 FIGURE 4. Mean annual precipitation in the Jordan River basin 178 FIGURE 5. The Hasbani, Banias and Dan sub-basins 181 a) Mean annual discharge and b) specific mean annual discharge of FIGURE 6. 182 the Hasbani, Banias and Dan Rivers (1944-2008) Specific discharge anomaly time series of the Hasbani, Banias and FIGURE 7. 182 Dan Rivers (1944-2008) Mean monthly flow regime of the Hasbani, Banias and Dan Rivers FIGURE 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arab-Israeli Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric Wars Praeger Security International Advisory Board
    Arab-Israeli Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric Wars Praeger Security International Advisory Board Board Cochairs Loch K. Johnson, Regents Professor of Public and International Affairs, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia (U.S.A.) Paul Wilkinson, Professor of International Relations and Chairman of the Advisory Board, Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, University of St. Andrews (U.K.) Members Eliot A. Cohen, Robert E. Osgood Professor of Strategic Studies and Director, Philip Merrill Center for Strategic Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins University (U.S.A.) Anthony H. Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, Center for Strategic and International Studies (U.S.A.) The´re`se Delpech, Senior Research Fellow, CERI (Atomic Energy Commission), Paris (France) Sir Michael Howard, former Professor of History of War, Oxford University, and Professor of Military and Naval History, Yale University (U.K.) Lieutenant General Claudia J. Kennedy, USA (Ret.), former Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Headquarters, Department of the Army (U.S.A.) Paul M. Kennedy, J. Richardson Dilworth Professor of History and Director, Inter- national Security Studies, Yale University (U.S.A.) Robert J. O’Neill, former Chichele Professor of the History of War, All Souls Col- lege, Oxford University (Australia) Shibley Telhami, Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland (U.S.A.) Jusuf Wanandi, co-founder and member, Board of Trustees, Centre for Strategic and International Studies (Indonesia) Fareed Zakaria, Editor, Newsweek International (U.S.A.) Arab-Israeli Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric Wars Anthony H.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Deforestation at Sadd Al-Ahmar Petra Region, Jordan Sadd Al-Ahmar, 1924-2011
    Documenting Deforestation at Sadd al-Ahmar Petra Region, Jordan Sadd al-Ahmar, 1924-2011 by Erin Addison, PhD., MLA Note: This is the author’s version of the book by the same title published by Lambert Academic Publishing. This version of the paper includes some photos which are not in the published version and affords the reader an opportunity to look at graphs, maps and photographs at higher resolution. This version is for personal/scholarly use only, and not for reproduction and circulation. Please cite as Addison, E. 2011. 1993. Documenting Deforestation at Sidd al-Ahmar, Petra Region, Jordan: Sadd al-Ahmar 1924-2011. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must begin by thanking the University of Arizona, International Arid Lands Consortium (IALC) and the Badia Research and Development Center (BRDC) for material and office support from October 2003 to December 2005. My faculty at the University of Arizona School of Landscape Architecture were ever-encouraging and supportive, and ever-patient with the intricacies of having a grad student working overseas. My committee -- Mintai Kim, Oscar Blazquez, Majed al-Hasanat and very especially my chair, Margaret Livingston -- deserves my warmest gratitude for all I learned as student of landscape architecture. It is Margaret who brought me to University of Arizona, and I consider myself extremely fortunate to have studied with her. So many others helped me during the initial research for my masters thesis that I am sure I will leave out someone important, and for this I beg forgiveness. The staff at Jordan Inspiration Tours in Wadi Musa accepted me as an intern for six months in 2005, and trained me with great kindness and good humor.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.- Heptageniidae, Ephemerellidae, Leptophlebiidae & Palingeniidae
    PRIVATE UBRARV OF WILLIAM L. PETERS Revue suisse Zool. I Tome 99 Fasc. 4 p. 835-858 I Geneve, decembre 1992 Mayflies from Israel (lnsecta; Ephemeroptera) 1.- Heptageniidae, Ephemerellidae, Leptophlebiidae & Palingeniidae * by Michel SARTORI 1 With 45 figures ABSTRACT This paper is the first part of a work dealing with the mayfly fauna of Israel. Eleven species are reported here. The most diversified family is the Heptageniidae with six species belonging to six different genera: Rhithrogena znojkoi (Tshemova), Epeorus zaitzevi Tshemova, Ecdyonurus asiaeminoris Demoulin, Electrogena galileae (Demoulin) (comb. nov.), Afronurus kugleri Demoulin and Heptagenia samochai (Demoulin) (comb. nov.). E. zaitzevi is new for the fauna of Israel. The male of H. samochai is described for the first time and the synonymy with H. lutea Kluge (syn. nov.) is proposed. Eggs of the six species are described and illustrated. Keys are provided for nymphs and adults. Ephemerellidae are represented by a single species, Ephemerella mesoleuca (Brauer). Leptophlebiid species are: Paraleptophlebia submarginata (Stephens), Choroterpes (Ch.) picteti Eaton and Choroterpes (Euthraulus) ortali nov. sp. described at all stages. New features to distinguish the nymphs of the Mediterranean Euthraulus species are provided. One species of Palingeniidae has been found in the collections of Bet Gordon Museum in Deganya: Palingenia orientalis Chopra. The female of this species is described for the first time. P. orientalis disappeared from the investigated area in the early fifties. Some geographical data are given on the distribution of the species inside and outside the investigated area, as well as some ecological observations. For instance, underwater emergence is reported for the first time in the genus Afronurus.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of Israel
    Sl. No River Name Draining Into 1 Nahal Betzet Mediterranean Sea 2 Nahal Kziv Mediterranean Sea 3 Ga'aton River Mediterranean Sea 4 Nahal Na‘aman Mediterranean Sea 5 Kishon River Mediterranean Sea 6 Nahal Taninim Mediterranean Sea 7 Hadera Stream Mediterranean Sea 8 Nahal Alexander Mediterranean Sea 9 Nahal Poleg Mediterranean Sea 10 Yarkon River Mediterranean Sea 11 Ayalon River Mediterranean Sea 12 Nahal Qana Mediterranean Sea 13 Nahal Shillo Mediterranean Sea 14 Nahal Sorek Mediterranean Sea 15 Lakhish River Mediterranean Sea 16 Nahal Shikma Mediterranean Sea 17 HaBesor Stream Mediterranean Sea 18 Nahal Gerar Mediterranean Sea 19 Nahal Be'er Sheva Mediterranean Sea 20 Nahal Havron Mediterranean Sea 21 Jordan River Dead Sea 22 Nahal Harod Dead Sea 23 Nahal Yissakhar Dead Sea 24 Nahal Tavor Dead Sea 25 Yarmouk River Dead Sea 26 Nahal Yavne’el Dead Sea 27 Nahal Arbel Dead Sea 28 Nahal Amud Dead Sea 29 Nahal Korazim Dead Sea 30 Nahal Hazor Dead Sea 31 Nahal Dishon Dead Sea 32 Hasbani River Dead Sea 33 Nahal Ayun Dead Sea 34 Dan River Dead Sea 35 Banias River Dead Sea 36 Nahal HaArava Dead Sea 37 Nahal Neqarot Dead Sea 38 Nahal Ramon Dead Sea 39 Nahal Shivya Dead Sea 40 Nahal Paran Dead Sea 41 Nahal Hiyyon Dead Sea 42 Nahal Zin Dead Sea 43 Tze'elim Stream Dead Sea 44 Nahal Mishmar Dead Sea 45 Nahal Hever Dead Sea 46 Nahal Shahmon Red Sea (Gulf of Aqaba) 47 Nahal Shelomo Red Sea (Gulf of Aqaba) For more information kindly visit : www.downloadexcelfiles.com www.downloadexcelfiles.com.
    [Show full text]
  • World's Major Rivers
    WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss AAnn IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn ttoo iinntteerrnnaattiioonnaall wwwwwwaatteerr llaawwwwww wwwwwwiitthh ccaassee ssttuuddiieess THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss An introduction to international water law with case studies Colorado River Commission of Nevada 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: (702) 486-2670 Website: http://crc.nv.gov November 2008 Jacob (Jay) D. Bingham, Chairman Ace I. Robinson, Vice Chairman Andrea Anderson, Commissioner Marybel Batjer, Commissioner Chip Maxfield, Commissioner George F. Ogilvie III, Commissioner Lois Tarkanian, Commissioner George M. Caan, Executive Director Primary Author: Daniel Seligman, Attorney at Law Columbia Research Corp. P.O. Box 99249 Seattle, Washington 98139 (206) 285-1185 Project Editors: McClain Peterson, Project Manager Manager, Natural Resource Division Colorado River Commission of Nevada Sara Price Special Counsel-Consultant Colorado River Commission of Nevada Esther Valle Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada Nicole Everett Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK World’s Major Rivers ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Daniel Seligman at the Columbia Research Corp. wishes to thank Jacqueline Pruner, attorney at law in Seattle, for her contribution to the section on water law in Canada and her valuable editing assistance throughout the entire document. The staff at the Murray-Darling Basin Commission and Goulburn-Murray Water in Australia provided important information about the Murray-Darling River system, patiently answered the author’s questions, and reviewed the draft text on water trading. Staff at the International Joint Commission in Washington, D.C., and the Prairie Provinces Water Board in Regina, Canada, also offered helpful comments on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Means of Resolving Water Distribution Disputes Between Israel and the Palestinians Maya Manna Roger Williams University
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Macro Center Working Papers Center For Macro Projects and Diplomacy 4-1-2006 “Virtual Water”: a modern means of resolving water distribution disputes between Israel and the Palestinians Maya Manna Roger Williams University Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/cmpd_working_papers Recommended Citation Manna, Maya, "“Virtual Water”: a modern means of resolving water distribution disputes between Israel and the Palestinians" (2006). Macro Center Working Papers. Paper 31. http://docs.rwu.edu/cmpd_working_papers/31 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center For Macro Projects and Diplomacy at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Macro Center Working Papers by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Virtual Water":A Modem Means of Resolving Water Distribution Disputes between Israel and the Palestinians The notion of a water deficit in the Middle East is not a new occurrence. Many generations inhabiting the area have been fighting for control over rivers and lakes in order to gain a constant water supply, as well as an advantageous position over the neighboring countries. After 2000, water, like trees, became a special focus of conflict in the Intifada. The government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority have been involved in many negotiations and confrontations struggling to establish an equal water distribution throughout the region. However, due to the violent history of their relations, the compromise is yet to be set. The Jordan River is one of the main sources of water shared in the region, and as a result, there is not enough water in the region to fulfill the requirements of the neighboring countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Hegemony in the Upper Jordan Waterscape: Control and Use of the Flows Water Alternatives 6(1): 86-106
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 6 | Issue 1 Zeitoun, M.; Eid-Sabbagh, K.; Talhami, M. and Dajani, M. 2013. Hydro-hegemony in the Upper Jordan waterscape: Control and use of the flows Water Alternatives 6(1): 86-106 Hydro-Hegemony in the Upper Jordan Waterscape: Control and Use of the Flows Mark Zeitoun School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; [email protected] Karim Eid-Sabbagh School of Oriental and African Studies, Houghton Square, London; [email protected] Michael Talhami Independent researcher, Amman, Jordan; [email protected] Muna Dajani Independent researcher, Jerusalem; [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper blends the analytical framework of hydro-hegemony with a waterscape reading to explore the use and methods of control of the Upper Jordan River flows. Seen as a sub-component of the broader Lebanon-Israel-Syria political conflict, the struggles over water are interpreted through evidence from the colonial archives, key informant interviews, media pieces, and policy and academic literature. Extreme asymmetry in the use and control of the basin is found to be influenced by a number of issues that also shape the concept of 'international waterscapes': political borders, domestic pressures and competition, perceptions of water security, and other non-material factors active at multiple spatial scales. Israeli hydro-hegemony is found to be independent of its riparian position, and due in part to its greater capacity to exploit the flows. More significant are the repeated Israeli expressions of hard power which have supported a degree of (soft) 'reputational' power, and enable control over the flows without direct physical control of the territory they run through – which is referred to here as 'remote' control.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Middle East at Peace: Hidden Issues in Arab–Israeli Hydropolitics
    Water Resources Development, Vol. 20, No. 2, 193–204, June 2004 Towards a Middle East at Peace: Hidden Issues in Arab–Israeli Hydropolitics ARNON MEDZINI* & AARON T. WOLF** *Department of Geography, Oranim School of Education, Tivon, Israel **Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA ABSTRACT When peace negotiations do one day resume between Israelis and Arabs, shared water resources will again take centre stage, acting both as an irritant between the parties, and as a tremendous inducement to reach agreement. The ‘hidden’ hydropo- litical issues that will need to be resolved between Israel, Lebanon and Syria in the course of eventual boundary talks are considered. Two of these issues, the village of Ghajar and its relation to the Wazani Springs, and the possibility of groundwater flow from the Litani to the Jordan headwaters, change the fundamental understanding of the relation- ship between hydrologic and political claims, and could threaten the entire approach to water negotiations both between Israel and Syria and between Israel and Lebanon. Fortunately, other agreements within the basin can inform the path solutions here might take. The most critical step towards conflict resolution is separating the concepts of territorial sovereignty from water security. This can be done most effectively by offering joint management, monitoring and enforcement strategies, as well as encouraging greater transparency in water data across boundaries. Introduction Despite the current deadly, and apparently intractable, conflict between Israelis and Arabs, history suggests that peace negotiations will one day resume. When they do, shared water resources will again take centre stage, acting both as an irritant between the parties, and as a tremendous inducement to reach agree- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Determination of KAC Water Losses and Recommended Solutions for Improvements; Situational Assessment
    WATER MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE (WMI) Report on the Determination of KAC Water Losses and Recommended Solutions for Improvements; Situational Assessment June 2018 This publicationDetermination was produced of KAC Water for Losses review and byRecommended the United Solutions States for Agency Improvements for International – Upper KAC Development. 1 It was prepared by Tetra Tech. CONCEPT PARTY DATE First draft completed: WMI March 25, 2018 Presentation to JVA: JVA March 28, 2018 Concurrence received: JVA May 13,2018 May 28, 2018 Final version submitted: WMI (per the modified J4 deliverable table in contract modification no. 4) Final version approved: COR June 26, 2018 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech under the USAID Water Management Initiative (WMI) Contract No. AID-278-C-16-00001. This report was prepared by: Tetra Tech 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, Vermont 05401 USA Telephone: (802) 658-3890 Fax: (802) 495-0282 E-Mail: [email protected] Tetra Tech Contacts: José Valdez, Chief of Party, [email protected] David Favazza, Project Manager, [email protected] All photos are by Tetra Tech unless otherwise noted. WATER MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE (WMI) Report on the Determination of KAC Water Losses and Recommended Solutions for Improvements; Situational Assessment Intervention No. 3.3.7: Support Improving the Conveyance System Efficiency in Jordan Valley May 2018 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon: Background and U.S. Relations
    Lebanon: Background and U.S. Relations Casey L. Addis Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs February 1, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40054 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Lebanon: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Lebanon is a religiously diverse country transitioning toward independence and democratic consolidation after a ruinous civil war and the subsequent Syrian and Israeli occupations. The United States and Lebanon have historically enjoyed a good relationship due in part to cultural and religious ties; the democratic character of the state; a large, Lebanese-American community in the United States; and the pro-western orientation of Lebanon, particularly during the cold war. Current policy priorities of the United States include strengthening the weak democratic institutions of the state, limiting the influence of Iran, Syria, and others in Lebanon’s political process, and countering threats from Hezbollah and other militant groups in Lebanon. Following Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon in 2005 and the war between Israel and Hezbollah in the summer of 2006, the Bush Administration requested and Congress appropriated a significant increase in U.S. assistance to Lebanon. Since 2006, U.S. assistance to Lebanon has topped $1 billion total over three years, including for the first time U.S. security assistance for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and Internal Security Forces (ISF) of Lebanon. Several key issues in U.S.-Lebanon relations could potentially affect future U.S. assistance to Lebanon. The scope and influence of foreign actors, primarily Syria and Iran; unresolved territorial disputes; concerns about extremist groups operating in Lebanon; and potential indictments by the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) are among the challenges facing the Lebanese government and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pre-Feasibility Study on Water Conveyance Routes to the Dead
    A PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON WATER CONVEYANCE ROUTES TO THE DEAD SEA Published by Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, Kibbutz Ketura, D.N Hevel Eilot 88840, ISRAEL. Copyright by Willner Bros. Ltd. 2013. All rights reserved. Funded by: Willner Bros Ltd. Publisher: Arava Institute for Environmental Studies Research Team: Samuel E. Willner, Dr. Clive Lipchin, Shira Kronich, Tal Amiel, Nathan Hartshorne and Shae Selix www.arava.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 5 2.1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE MED-DEAD SEA CONVEYANCE PROJECT ................................................................... 7 2.2 THE HISTORY OF THE CONVEYANCE SINCE ISRAELI INDEPENDENCE .................................................................. 9 2.3 UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION ......................................................................................................... 12 2.4 MULTILATERAL COOPERATION ............................................................................................................ 12 3 MED-DEAD PROJECT BENEFITS 14 3.1 WATER MANAGEMENT IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY ............................................... 14 3.2 POWER GENERATION IN ISRAEL ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3 ENERGY SECTOR IN THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY .................................................................................... 20 3.4 POWER GENERATION IN JORDAN ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Get App BROCHURE
    #EXPERIENCELIFE INTRODUCTION GROUP ADVENTURES INDEPENDENT TRIPS BAMBA BRAND KENYA, UGANDA 4 SOUTH AMERICA ASIA & RWANDA 54 SOUTH AMERICA HISTORY & PERU VIETNAM, PERU 22 TANZANIA 67 PHILOSOPHY 5 CAMBODIA & 40 56 THAILAND BOLIVIA 27 ZIMBABWE, BOLIVIA 69 BAMBA FOR INDONESIA & BOTSWANA & 6 CHILE & 57 CHILE GOOD ARGENTINA 30 PHILIPPINES 43 NAMIBIA 71 WHY TRAVEL BRAZIL SRI LANKA & SOUTH AFRICA 58 ARGENTINA, 73 WITH BAMBA 7 31 MALDIVES 44 ISRAEL & COLOMBIA & BRAZIL 75 ECUADOR 33 INDIA, NEPAL & JORDAN 59 BAMBA APP 8 TIBET 45 COLOMBIA 77 TRIP STYLES JAPAN & SOUTH EUROPE 10 CENTRAL AMERICA GALPAGAGOS & KOREA 47 ICELAND MEXICO 34 60 ECUADOR 79 CHINA, BELIZE IRELAND, 35 KYRGYZSTAN, 48 SCOTLAND & CENTRAL AMERICA & THE KAZAKHSTAN 61 GUATEMALA & SCANDINAVIA CARIBBEAN COSTA RICA 36 OCEANIA SPAIN, MEXICO, CUBA, PORTUGAL, GUATEMALA & 82 NORTH AMERICA AUSTRALIA, NEW GERMANY & 62 BELIZE ZEALAND & FIJI 49 RUSSIA USA & CANADA 37 GUATEMALA, HONDURAS & AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST CROATIA, 85 GREECE & 63 COSTA RICA MOROCCO & TURKEY EGYPT 53 PANAMA 87 TABLE OF CONTENTS IT’S TIME TO GO AND EXPLORE THE WORLD! INDEPENDENT TRIPS TRAVEL PASSES CUBA & NEPAL 108 EUROPE SOUTH AMERICA CENTRAL THAILAND, CARIBBEAN 89 AMERICA 141 MALAYSIA & ISLANDS UZBEKISTAN, ICELAND & BRAZIL, SINGAPORE 153 MONGOLIA & NORWAY 120 ARGENTINA & COSTA RICA & CHINA 109 132 NORTH AMERICA UNITED CHILE PANAMA 142 VIETNAM, CAMBODIA & USA & CANADA JAPAN KINGDOM & 153 92 110 IRELAND 121 SOUTH AMERICA THAILAND PASSES 133 NORTH AMERICA ASIA OCEANIA SPAIN & USA & CANADA PORTUGAL 122 CHILE & 146 THAILAND NEW ZEALAND,
    [Show full text]