(EHA), Uganda Weekly Activity Report Week 37

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Emergency and Humanitarian Action (EHA), Uganda Weekly Activity Report General Situation Political, Social and Security; Week 37, • LRA: Government of Uganda is continuing to support the government of Sudan and Central African Republic (CAR) to pursue the Lord’s Resistance Army in Sudan and Central African Republic. th th 7 to 13 September to • Acholi and Lango sub-region is calm • Karamoja sub-region; Disarmament of armed Karamojong by UPDF continues. 2009 Main Events of Interest/Concern for Health; • An outbreak of Influenza A (H1N1) in a school in Bushenyi has been confirmed. Eight (8) out of 10 samples taken randomly from the cohort have tested positive for A (H1N1). The school with a population of 400 students has just opened about a week ago. A national rapid response team has been dispatched to support the district response. • The government is working on a contingency plan for a possible El-Niño which is expected to start in October. Three possible scenarios have been developed by the national taskforce. In the best case scenario maximum 30 districts will be affected with limited damage to infrastructure to which the community could be able to manage without external support. The Mid case scenario anticipates 45 districts to be affected with 10 districts inaccessible and infrastructure damaged making the districts unable to manage the impact of the disaster. The worst case scenario expects over 50 districts (out of 80) to be affected, 15 of which will be inaccessible. 300,000 households will be affected with a serious impact on infrastructure. Analysis and Health Consequences (Health Problems and Needs of Affected Population) Malaria: Lango; The number of cases in wk37 has shown a further drop of 10.3% between wks36 & 37 for the 2nd consecutive week (there was a 6% drop between wks35 & 36 - and is still slightly higher than that of wk37 of 2008 by 11.8%. There were ten (10) deaths due to malaria in epiwk37 (6 from Lira, 3 from Apac & 1 from Oyam) cf. one (1) from Lira in wk36; seven (7) in wk35 (5 from Oyam & 2 from Lira); and three (3) in epiwk34. So far wk37 with 10 deaths has overtaken wk13 which had the highest reported malaria deaths of (8) from all the districts Fig. 1: Lango weekly malaria trends 2007 -2009 20000 100% 18000 90% 16000 80% Highlights 14000 70% 12000 60% An outbreak of 10000 50% 8000 40% H1N1 in Busheni 6000 30% No. of weekly malaria cases school 4000 20% of% completeness of reporting 2000 10% 0 0% 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 Preparation for a Epi weeks Lango 2007 malaria Lango 2008 malaria Lango2009 Malaria possible El-Niño Completeness of reporting 2007 Completeness of reporting 2008 Completeness of reporting 2009 Acholi, Since week 19 the total number of cases for 2009 has remained high in Acholi region. This reporting week only Gulu district has a dramatic reduction in the number of cases by up to 18%. 6 deaths were reported from Gulu and Kitgum districts. Fig II Clinical malaria cases in Acholi region and completeness of reporting for the years 07-09 Acknowledgement Karamoja sub-region: the region has noted a moderate decline in malaria cases but still remain slightly Production of this weekly above the 2008 incidence. activity report has been Fig 1: Karamoja Region,Weekly Malaria Trends made possible by Week 37 contribution from the 14000 110 100 followings 12000 90 10000 80 70 g 8000 60 s reportin ber of Cases 50 U um 6000 H N % 40 4000 30 20 2000 10 0 0 13579111315171921232527293133353739414345474951 Epidemiological Week Number of cases 2009 %completeness 2008 %completeness 2009 Number of cases 2008 Dysentery: Acholi Sub-region; The number of cases of dysentery reported in Acholi sub-region in 2009 is comparable to that of 2008. However there is a slight increase in Pader district for the last two weeks. See figure IV below for details. Lango sub-region; There has been a significant rise in the reported cases of dysentery in the sub-region for the last four (4) epiwks34 to 37 as the rains return. The trends are significantly higher than those recorded in the same period in 2008 & 2007. Dokolo recorded high verified incidence in wk34 & 35 but has dropped in epiwks36 & 37. While the incidence showed a sharp rise in Lira and Oyam in epiwk37, it has remained low in Apac & Dokolo. Data has been verified. Laboratory tests are to be done in Lira Reg. Ref. Hospital for definitive diagnosis Hygiene promotion & health education is on- going. Fig. 3: Weekly Dysentery Trends in Lango Sub‐region: 2007‐2009 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445 Lango Dysentery 2009 Lango Dysentery 2007 Lango Dysentery 2008 Karamoja sub-region; The incidence of dysentery incidence remained high this week compared to the past year though some decline was noted this week. Kaabong & Moroto reported the highest cases in the region. In view of the prevailing suspected Hep E outbreak, this is a worrying indicator. Most districts in the region continue to battle with the challenge of low latrine availability, use and resistance amongst other poor sanitary conditions. Fig 3 below illustrates the situation Fig 3: Karamoja Region, Weekly Dysentry Trends, Week 37 500 120 450 100 400 350 80 300 250 60 Number of Cases of Number 200 % HUs reporting 40 150 100 20 50 0 0 13579111315171921232527293133353739414345474951 Epidemiological Week Number of cases 2009 %completeness 2008 %completeness 2009 Number of cases 2008 Hepatitis E; Kitgum district; 18 new cases of Hepatitis E were registered in Kitgum up from 13 last week bringing the cumulative total 10,455.cases and 167 deaths (CFR 1.6%). Pader district; No new case of Hepatitis E was registered in Pader district in epi-week 37. The cumulative number of cases to date registered in Pader district is 221 with 8 deaths (CFR 3.6%). 16 of the 19 Sub Counties have reported at least one case. Karamoja; A total of 9 new cases of suspected Hep E were reported this week compared to 5 in the past week. Of the cases 6 were from Kaabong & 3 in Kotido district. The result of the samples forwarded still waits. There was also one reported death due to suspected Hep E in Kotido See table I and figure VI below for details. District New cases New deaths Cumulative Cumulative deaths cases Kitgum 18 0 10,455 167 (1.6%) Gulu & 0 0 44 (9 positive) 0 (0) Amuru Pader 0 0 221 8 (3.6%) Kaabong 6 (suspected 0 10 (suspected 0 cases) cases) Kotido 3 (Suspected 1 4 (Suspected 1 cases) (suspected) cases) Total 27 1 10,734 175(1.6%) (suspected) Measles; 2 cases reported from Oyam and Lira Meningitis; No suspected cases reported in the week. AFP; one suspected case reported from Pader Cholera Busia district; Last case admitted on 5th September 2009. Cumulative number of cases is 106 with 8 deaths (CFR 7.5%) Kasese district; 12 cases in admission. Cumulative number of cases is 477 with 10 deaths (CFR 2.1%). HINI; ♣ As of 22nd September a total of 28 confirmed cases were reported in Uganda with no death. The outbreak in Busheni School was investigated and 8 out of 10 samples taken randomly tested positive for H1N1. A team from MOH and WHO in the field for further analysis and investigation. Micronutrient deficiency; The micro nutrient deficiency in Karamoja district is still not under control; 4 new cases were reported from another sub county (Kakomongole) Actions (WHO response, Sida grant) Epidemic Response Disease surveillance; WHO continues to support all districts in Acholi, Lango and Karamoja sub-region financially and technically in disease surveillance. Weekly epidemiological reports depicting disease trends are shared with all the districts and partners. Malaria; WHO is supporting the districts to respond to the high number of cases of malaria. Note that most districts in Acholi, Lango and Karamoja sub-regions have low stock of anti-malarial drugs at health facilities. Diarrheal disease; and Hepatitis E Follow up on the epidemic of HEV in Kabong district of Karamoja. Supported the development of response plan for the district. Provided assorted essential supplies. Investigation of the causes of dysentery in Gulu and Amuru has started by the districts. It will take a period of four weeks. WHO will assist with transport of specimens collected weekly to UVRI. HINI; • Response; ♣ WHO participated in the investigation of the influenza outbreak in Busheni district ♣ Work on finalization of the Pandemic Preparedness and Response Plan ongoing ♣ Surveillance continues in all districts and health facilities. ♣ Major challenge to the response is o Lack of fund to implement the national preparedness and response plan. Hepatitis E; Response to Hepatitis E in Kitgum and Pader district include; • Water chlorination ongoing in some sub counties in Kitgum district • Community mobilization and sensitization is ongoing on the local FM radios • Repair and maintenance of water sources activities are ongoing in some sub counties AFP; Results for stool samples sent to UVRI in epi-week 33, 34 and 35 have not yet been received. Cholera Case management ongoing at one treatment centre in Busia district and three treatment centres in Kasese district. Community mobilization and sensitization ongoing in all districts. Mini UDHS in Acholi and Karamoja sub-region; • Data collection complete in 8 of the 9 district • Data capture ongoing • Preliminary result expected in November Other partners Partners active in the region include; ASB, CESVI, Concern, MTI, IMC, IRC, ACF, AVSI, AIS and Mercy Corps, UNFPA, GOAL, Malaria consortium (MC), AMREF, MEDAIR, , AVSI, MTI, ICRCS, NUMAT, Visions in Action, Health Alert, ARC and CUAMM, Major activities by partners: • Supporting the implementation of the HIV / AIDS activities in the district plan; • Partners participating in the malaria control activities following the upsurge of clinical malaria; • Support to Malaria, TB and HIV/AIDS activities in the districts including training of CMDs for the new ant malarial treatment protocol.
Recommended publications
  • Part of a Former Cattle Ranching Area, Land There Was Gazetted by the Ugandan Government for Use by Refugees in 1990

    Part of a Former Cattle Ranching Area, Land There Was Gazetted by the Ugandan Government for Use by Refugees in 1990

    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Working Paper No. 32 UNHCR’s withdrawal from Kiryandongo: anatomy of a handover Tania Kaiser Consultant UNHCR CP 2500 CH-1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] October 2000 These working papers provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online at <http://www.unhcr.org/epau>. ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction The Kiryandongo settlement for Sudanese refugees is located in the north-eastern corner of Uganda’s Masindi district. Part of a former cattle ranching area, land there was gazetted by the Ugandan government for use by refugees in 1990. The first transfers of refugees took place shortly afterwards, and the settlement is now well established, with land divided into plots on which people have built houses and have cultivated crops on a small scale. Anthropological field research (towards a D.Phil. in anthropology, Oxford University) was conducted in the settlement from October 1996 to March 1997 and between June and November 1997. During the course of the fieldwork UNHCR was involved in a definitive process whereby it sought to “hand over” responsibility for the settlement at Kiryandongo to the Ugandan government, arguing that the refugees were approaching self-sufficiency and that it was time for them to be absorbed completely into local government structures. The Ugandan government was reluctant to accept this new role, and the refugees expressed their disbelief and feelings of betrayal at the move.
  • Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019

    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019

    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Tufts University Rome, 2019 REQUIRED CITATION FAO and Tufts University. 2019. Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods – Karamoja and Northern Uganda. November 2019. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Tufts University concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the University in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the University. ISBN 978-92-5-131747-1 (FAO) ©FAO and Tufts University, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
  • Uganda Humanitarian Update

    Uganda Humanitarian Update

    UGANDA HUMANITARIAN UPDATE MAY – JUNE 2010 I. HIGHLIGHTS AMID HEAVY RAINS, HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN PARTS OF KARAMOJA AND TESO HAMPERED BY DETERIORATING ROAD CONDITIONS OVER 1,000 CHOLERA CASES REGISTERED IN KARAMOJA SINCE APRIL 2010 90% OF IDPS IN NORTHERN UGANDA NO LONGER LIVING IN CAMPS, BUT LAND CONFLICTS AND LANDMINES IMPEDING RETURN IN SOME AREAS II. SECURITY AND ACCESS SECURITY The general situation in Karamoja remained fragile, according to the United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS). Cattle raids, including on protected kraals, particularly affected Moroto and Kotido, with some resulting in fierce clashes between the Uganda People’s Defence Forces and the raiders. In South Karamoja incidents associated with food distributions involved theft of food and non-food items (NFIs), and attacks on food distributors as well as on food recipients. Following three road ambushes in Alerek sub-county of Abim District during the month, UNDSS issued an advisory limiting UN movement along the Abim-Kotido road to between 09.00Hrs and 16.00Hrs with effect from 28 June 2010. Three civilians were killed in one of those ambushes. In northern Uganda, Amuru District officials and partners carried out a joint assessment in the wake of a violent land dispute that occurred in Koli village of Pabbo sub-county on 23 June. Preliminary findings indicated that one person was killed and several others injured in the dispute involving two clans. Some 40 huts were torched and many members of either clan had fled the village. Also of concern in the region during the reporting period were raids by illegally armed Karamojong, particularly in Pader District.
  • Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment

    Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment

    KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN

    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN

    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
  • The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)

    The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)

    COMMODITY REPORT BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan SIMONE HAYSOM I MICHAEL McLAGGAN JULIUS KAKA I LUCY MODI I KEN OPALA MARCH 2021 BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan ww Simone Haysom I Michael McLaggan Julius Kaka I Lucy Modi I Ken Opala March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank everyone who gave their time to be interviewed for this study. They would like to extend particular thanks to Dr Catherine Nabukalu, at the University of Pennsylvania, and Bryan Adkins, at UNEP, for playing an invaluable role in correcting our misperceptions and deepening our analysis. We would also like to thank Nhial Tiitmamer, at the Sudd Institute, for providing us with additional interviews and information from South Sudan at short notice. Finally, we thank Alex Goodwin for excel- lent editing. Interviews were conducted in South Sudan, Uganda and Kenya between February 2020 and November 2020. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simone Haysom is a senior analyst at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), with expertise in urban development, corruption and organized crime, and over a decade of experience conducting qualitative fieldwork in challenging environments. She is currently an associate of the Oceanic Humanities for the Global South research project based at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Ken Opala is the GI-TOC analyst for Kenya. He previously worked at Nation Media Group as deputy investigative editor and as editor-in-chief at the Nairobi Law Monthly. He has won several journalistic awards in his career.
  • Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg

    Killing the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg

    KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 KILLING THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region Caroline Adoch Eugene Gerald Ssemakula ACODE Policy Research Series No.47, 2011 Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Adoch, C., and Ssemakula, E., (2011). Killing the Goose that Lays the Golden Egg: An Analysis of Budget Allocations and Revenue from the Environment and Natural Resource Sector in Karamoja Region. ACODE Policy Research Series, No. 47, 2011. Kampala. © ACODE 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. The reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purposes or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction. ISBN 978997007077 Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................
  • Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda

    Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda

    Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda November Monthly Programme Update 2008 Highlights Epidemic outbreak of cholera in Nakivale refugee settlement camp Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis survey completed in Kitgum and Pader districts. Response to Hepatitis E outbreak in Northern Uganda continues as trends stagnate in Kitgum and increase in Pader district A drive to eradicate Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) launched in Dokolo district General Situation: Political, Social and Security Refugees from Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); As of 30th November 2008, over 27,000 refugees had crossed from DRC into Uganda. Those who crossed have settled in Nakivale refugee settlement camp, WHO Emergency and Humanitarian Action, Uganda Matanda transit centre and among the host communities in Uganda. Karamoja region; Disarmament initiated by the government of Uganda is ongoing in Karamoja region with reports of few incidences of armed clashes between government forces and Karamojongs Acholi sub-region; The anticipated signing of the final peace agreement between the Government of Uganda and leader of the Lords Resistant Army did not take place as planned on the 29th November 2008 Programme Implementation Emergency Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS Response Project (Sida) Kitgum District Provided technical, financial, logistic and human resource support to Hepatitis E control interventions in Kitgum district through coordination of response, support to surveillance/ Case management and deployment of human resource (3 WASH Consultants/
  • KOTIDO District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile August 2014

    KOTIDO District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile August 2014

    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA KARAMOJA KOTIDO District HAzArd, risk And VulnerAbility Profile August 2014 KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE | i With support from: United Nations Development Programme Plot 11, Yusuf Lule Road P.O. Box 7184 Kampala, Uganda For more information: www.undp.org ii | KOTIDO HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE Contents Acronyms.....................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgement........................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 3 Objectives...... .............................................................................................................3 Methodology ................................................................................................................3 Overview of the District ...............................................................................................6 Brief district history ..................................................................................................6 Location and administrative structure ......................................................................6 Ethnicity ....................................................................................................................6
  • Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi Le

    Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi Le

    Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 Kitgum District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv Acronyms.....................................................................................................................v Acknowledgment ........................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary................................................................................................... vii Defi nition of Terms ...................................................................................................... ix Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................1 Methodology ................................................................................................................1 Overview of the District................................................................................................4 Location and Administration ........................................................................................4 Climate ........................................................................................................................6
  • Implementation Status & Results

    Implementation Status & Results

    The World Bank Report No: ISR13907 Implementation Status & Results Uganda Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project (NUSAF2) (P111633) Operation Name: Second Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 8 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-May-2014 (NUSAF2) (P111633) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Uganda Approval FY: 2009 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 28-May-2009 Original Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jan-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 19-Nov-2013 Effectiveness Date 25-Nov-2009 Revised Closing Date 31-Aug-2014 Actual Mid Term Review Date 14-Jun-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve access of beneficiary households in Northern Uganda to income earning opportunities and better basic socio-economic services. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Livelihood Investment Support 60.00 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation 30.00 Institutional Development 10.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The NUSAF II project originally planned to finance 9750 (i.e. 8000 Household Income Support (HIS), 1000 Public Works (PW) and 750 Community Infrastructure Rehabilitation) sub projects in the five year of its implementation period. As of February 3, 2013 a total of 8,764 subprojects (i.e.
  • Final Evaluation of the Opportunities for Reducing Adolescent and Child Labor Through Education (ORACLE) Project in Uganda

    Final Evaluation of the Opportunities for Reducing Adolescent and Child Labor Through Education (ORACLE) Project in Uganda

    This page left intentionally blank. Independent Final Evaluation of the Opportunities for Reducing Adolescent and Child Labor Through Education (ORACLE) Project in Uganda International Rescue Committee Cooperative Agreement Number: E-9-K-3-0053 22000077 Funding for this evaluation was provided by the United States Department of Labor under Task Order number DOLQ059622437. Points of view or opinions in this evaluation report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 II EVALUATION OF ORACLE 5 2.1 Final Evaluation Objectives 5 2.2 Methodology of Final Evaluation 6 2.3 Midterm Evaluation 8 III FINAL EVALUATION: FINDINGS 15 3.1 Program Design 15 3.2 Impact 17 3.3 Project Implementation and Performance 19 3.4 Project Monitoring and Measurement 25 3.5 Project Management 26 3.6 Partnership Coordination and Effectiveness 28 3.7 Sustainability and Replicability 30 IV CONCLUSIONS 35 4.1 Lessons Learned, Best Practices, and Innovations 35 4.2 Recommendations 37 ANNEXES Annex 1: Evaluation Terms of Reference Annex 2: Documents Review Annex 3: Cross Reference of USDOL Questions in TOR pages 5–6 and Answers in the Evaluation Report Annex 4: List of Most Individuals Interviewed and Sites Annex 5: List of Individual Interviews and Focus Group Meetings Conducted With ORACLE Beneficiaries and