Stigmatization and Employment Problems in Epilepsy 395
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Seizure 2000; 9: 394–401 doi: 10.1053/seiz.2000.0439, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Felt stigma and impact of epilepsy on employment status among Estonian people: exploratory study MARJU RATSEPP,¨ ANDRE OUN,˜ SULEV HALDRE & AIN-ELMAR KAASIK Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia Correspondence to: Marju Ratsepp¨ , MD, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2, L. Puusepp St., 51014 Tartu, Estonia. E-mail: [email protected] This article examines the impact of epilepsy and its treatment on employment status and the extent of stigma among patients with epilepsy. Clinical and demographic data concerning patients examined during a recent epidemiological survey were obtained from medical notes and postal self-completed questionnaires. Information was collected from 90 patients aged 16–70 years. A third of the respondents had been seizure-free during the last year. Thirty-nine percent were working full-time, 24% were working part-time and 11% were unemployed. Sixty-three percent from those working part-time or unemployed considered their epilepsy to be a significant reason for this. Overall, 55.4% believed they had been treated unfairly at work or when trying to get a job. Fifty-one percent of respondents felt stigmatized by epilepsy, 14% of them highly so. The level of employment among epileptic people was not lower than in the general population. The percentage of stigmati- zation in general and the percentage of the severely stigmatized was as high or even higher than in other studies. Occurrence of stigma and its severity depended first and foremost on the type of seizures. The frequency of seizures was not clearly related to this. c 2000 BEA Trading Ltd Key words: epilepsy; stigmatization; employment status; Estonia. INTRODUCTION care7. It means they must have the courage to express their opinion and to show their dissatisfaction. Individ- Several investigators have discovered psychological uals with epilepsy often have problems with employ- and social problems among people with epilepsy. Liv- ment8, 9, although there is evidence that when seizures ing with epilepsy necessitates paying attention to more are well-controlled and uncomplicated by any other than seizures. Though being episodic, they impact on a handicap they do not generally experience problems10. wide range of daily activities and feelings. The misun- Part-time employment and unemployment have been derstanding and the resulting social stigma surround- identified as two very serious problems among peo- ing epilepsy can often cause more suffering than the ple with epilepsy5, being closely connected to overall seizures themselves. Patients with epilepsy often feel well-being11, 12. Many investigators have studied the stigmatized by their condition1–3. Felt stigma has been problems accompanying epilepsy, however data from described as the shame associated with being epileptic Eastern European countries are scarce. and a source of unhappiness3. Different authors have Estonia is a newly independent state, re-established stressed that in order for stigma to exist, individuals after the collapse of the Soviet Union which geo- must accept their devaluation4. A person’s own reac- graphically is positioned in Eastern Europe on the tion to having a seizure disorder is even considered the Baltic Sea coast. Today, of the 1.5 million people who most significant factor in adjustment5. The perception live in Estonia, 64.6% are ethnic Estonians. Among of stigma can reduce motivation for work and social other nationalities, Russians represent the largest fig- activity6. Nowadays, it has become relatively common ure (about 28.5%). The Russian-speaking population to have patients make a judgement about their medical is not evenly distributed throughout the country13. 1059–1311/00/060394 + 08 $35.00/0 c 2000 BEA Trading Ltd Stigmatization and employment problems in epilepsy 395 Southern Estonia is focused on Tartu, the historic uni- the project was approved by the Ethics Committee of versity town and the country’s second largest city. Be- the University of Tartu. All of the respondents had at ing the intellectual and educational centre of Estonia, least a basic education level with sufficient ability to Tartu demonstrates quite typical demographic charac- read and write, and were capable of understanding and teristics for Estonia with the exception that the per- completing the questionnaires. Clinical information, if centage of the Russian-speaking population is lower needed, was abstracted once again from medical notes than in Estonia in general. and during the personal re-examination of subjects. The present report is a preliminary study and the first Abstracted information used in the study related to in its field in our country. The aim of the study was the etiology of epilepsy, classification of seizure type to examine the impact of epilepsy and its treatment and current antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. To eval- on employment status and the extent of stigma among uate the impact of epilepsy on employment status and individuals with epilepsy, focusing on the following perceived stigma, the patients were sent a question- questions: What is the current treatment status? How naire through the mail. Following the example of other many people feel stigmatized by their epilepsy? What quality-of-life studies conducted among epileptic peo- is the relationship between feelings of stigma and the ple10, 14–16, the questionnaire employed a combination main clinical characteristics describing seizures? Do of open questions together with a previously translated the feelings of stigmatization make it more difficult and validated scale (The Stigma of Epilepsy Scale). to perceive the psychosocial problems connected to In addition, single items were included which referred epilepsy and employment status? What is the current specifically to feelings of stigmatization in the areas employment status of the respondents? To what extent of employment (Table 1). The questionnaire contained is it affected by their disease? Had there been any oc- a number of questions covering the following issues. casions when people had been treated unfairly at work (1) Demographic characteristics: information was ob- because of their epilepsy? tained about subjects’ sex, age, marital and employ- ment status, and education level. (2) Economical and financial status: patients were asked to state whether SUBJECTS AND METHODS they considered it to be ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘satis- factory’, ‘moderately bad’, or ‘very bad’. (3) Seizure The research took place between 1997 and 1998 and frequency: patients were asked whether they had had followed an epidemiological survey of epilepsy in the one or more seizures in a month, less than one a city of Tartu, Estonia. The epidemiological survey in- month, or not at all in the past year. (4) Previous re- cluded persons who were residents of Tartu and were search has shown that patients’ perception of the sever- aged 19 and over, and had before or within the course ity of their seizure disorder may be more important of 01/01/1991–01/01/1996 had at least two unpro- than seizure frequency in determining their psycholog- voked epileptic seizures, at least one of them within ical and social well-being17. Therefore, subjects were the previous 5 years. Data collection for epidemio- asked to assess their seizures as ‘very severe’, ‘severe’, logical study consisted of two parts: data registration ‘medium’, or ‘light’. (5) AED treatment and side ef- from a multi-source medical register review and data fects: patients were asked about the AED they were registration from a personal case re-examination. Case taking and about the experienced side effects during records of patients treated in the University Hospital, the past month, as well about the satisfaction with the Outpatients’ Clinics, physicians offices, emergency current treatment and about the changes in AED med- rooms and the electroencephalograpic laboratory with ication in the past year. (6) Compliance with medica- a diagnosis of epilepsy, convulsions, syncope, amnes- tion: patients were asked to state whether they never tic attacks and abnormal involuntary movements were missed taking their AEDs, missed less than once a reviewed and invitations for re-examination were sent month, missed less than once a week, or missed more to the suitable persons. Over the last 2 years, all the than once a week. According to other studies, correla- patients were re-examined at least once by a neurolo- tions between patient reports and objective methods gist to specify the type of their seizures. This present has been shown to be high14. (7) Perceived stigma study was based on the analysis of data collected from was measured with a three-item Stigma Scale, devel- a sample of 90 patients, in the 16–70 year age group. oped originally for stroke18, which was adapted for The patients were picked out randomly from the pre- epilepsy and is already used in other quality-of-life liminary lists of the epidemiological study leaving out studies14, 15. Respondents with epilepsy had to state the people who were not capable of understanding Es- whether they; (a) felt that other people were uncom- tonian (mostly the Russian-speaking people) because fortable with them, (b) treated them as inferior, or there were not any sufficiently well translated and val- (c) preferred to avoid them. Each of the three items idated questionnaires available for them. All patients required a yes/no response. An individual’s score was gave their consent to participate in the research and the sum of the ‘yes’ responses and the higher the score, 396 M. Ratsepp¨ et al. the greater the perception of stigma was. The scale the person was dead, five with a note that the person was translated into Estonian by two independent na- no longer lived at the address, five because the persons tive Estonian speakers with an excellent knowledge of were not capable of understanding the questions due to English.