Effects of Functional Communication Training (Fact)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2012 Effects of Functional Communication Training (fact) On the Communicative, Self-Initiated Toileting Behavior for Students with Developmental Disabilities in a School Setting Jinnie Kim Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Special Education and Teaching Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Jinnie, "Effects of Functional Communication Training (fact) On the Communicative, Self-Initiated Toileting Behavior for Students with Developmental Disabilities in a School Setting" (2012). Dissertations. 359. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/359 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2012 Jinnie Kim LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING (FCT) ON THE COMMUNICATIVE, SELF-INITIATED TOILETING BEHAVIOR FOR STUDENTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES IN A SCHOOL SETTING A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF EDUCATION PROGRAM IN CUMMRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION BY JINNIE KIM CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to sincerely thank my advisor Dr. Hank Bohanon without whom this project would not have been possible. Thank you for your patience, support, and direction throughout the project. Your dedication to the field of Special Education and your expertise are truly inspirational. I also would like to thank Dr. Pamela Fenning for her continued encouragement and support throughout the project. Thank you for proving me a thoughtful critique of my written work. I also would like to thank Dr. Lynne Golomb for her behavioral suggetions and encouragement. I am also grateful to Dr. Gina Coffee for her wonderful feedback and clinical expertise. I would like to thank the administrators at the research site, Ms. Carole Kilcoyne and Ms. Patricia Palmer, for their continued administrative support and wonderful feedback. Much thanks to the paraprofessionals who participated in the project. Your willingness and dedication to the project were so much appreciated. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family and friends for their support and encouragement throughout the project. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS …………………………………………………………… iii LIST OF TABLES …………………………………………………………………… vii LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………….... viii ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………… ix CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………….. 1 Definition of Challenging Behaviors …………………………………...... 2 Definition of Developmental Disability ………………………………….. 5 Enuresis ………………………………………………………………….... 8 Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) ……………………………………….. 10 Functional Communication Training (FCT) ………………………………. 12 Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) ………………………………... 13 Statement of the Problem ………………………………………………..… 14 Purpose of the Study ………………………………………………...……. 17 Limitations ………………………………………………………………... 19 Summary …………………………………………………………………. 21 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ………………………………………………… 23 Introduction ……………………………………………………………… 23 Mental Retardation ………………………………………………………... 24 Autism …………………………………………………………………….. 26 Enuresis ……….…………………………………………………………... 27 Classical Conditioning ……………………………………………………. 31 Operant Conditioning/Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) …… …………. 34 Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) ….……………….. 46 Functional Communication Training (FCT) ………………………………. 50 Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) ….…………………………….. 53 Summary ………………………………………………………………….. 67 III. METHOD …………………………………………………………………….. 68 Introduction ………………………………… …………………………….. 68 Participants …...………..………………………………………………..…. 70 Setting ………………………………………………………………..…… 75 Data Collection Instrumentation ………………………………………..… 78 Study Design …………………………………………………………..…. 82 Procedure ……………………………………………………………….... 83 Implementation Fidelity ……………………………………….……….… 96 iv Social Validity ………………………………………………………..….. 98 Interobserver Agreement ………………………….…………………..…. 99 Data Analysis ……………………………………………………………. 100 Summary ………………………………………………………………… 101 IV. RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………. 103 Introduction ………………………………………………………………. 103 Description of the Participants ………………………………………….... 105 Results of the Instruments .……………………………………………….. 110 Target Behavior Changes .………………………………………………... 116 V. DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………......... 122 Summary of the Study …………………………………………………… 122 Discussion …….………………………………………………………….. 125 Qualitative Field Observations ………………………………………….. 133 Implications ……………………………………………………………... 137 Limitations …………………………………………………………….... 139 Directions for Future Research …………………………………………... 140 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………. 142 APPENDIX A. FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT INTERVIEW (FAI) FORM ……………. 143 B. FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OBSERVATON (FAO) FORM ………… 146 C. COMPTETING BEHAVOR PATHWAY MODEL ………………………. 148 D. TOILETING TASK ANALSYS SHEET (FOR FEMALE STUDENT) …... 150 E. TOIELTING TASK ANALSYS SHEET (FOR MALE STUDENT) ……... 152 F. FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING—PART I ……………. 154 G. FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING—PART II …………… 156 H. FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING (FCT) IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST ……………………………………….. 158 I. SOCIAL VALIDITY QUESTIONNAIRE ………………………………… 161 J. FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING INTERVENTION (ENGLISH VERSION) ……………………………………………………... 163 K. FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING INTERVENTION (SPANISH VERSION) …………………………………………………….. 167 L. CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN RESEARCH—PARENTAL CONSENT (ENGLISH VERSION) ……………………………………………………. 172 M. CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN RESEARCH—PARENTAL CONSENT (SPANISH VERSION) ……………………………………………………. 175 N. CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN RESEARCH (PARAPROFESSIONAL CONSENT) …………………………………… 178 O. DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS …………………………………………... 181 v REFERENCE LIST …………………………………………………………….. 188 VITA ……………………………………………………………………………. 195 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Participant Demographic Information …………………………………….. 106 2. Each Participant’s Developmental Level …………………………………. 109 3. Each Participant’s Possible Function of Problem Behavior and Alternative, Replacement Behavior …………………………………………………. 112 4. Each Participant’s Pre- and Post-Test Score on the Toileting Analysis Sheet.. 113 5. Paraprofessional Responses to a Social Validity Questionnaire, the Treatment Evaluation Inventory—Short Form (TEI-SF) …………..... 115 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Process of classical conditioning …………………………………….. 32 2 Application of classical conditioning ………………………………… 33 3 Behavior hypothesis statement-blank form ………………………….. 58 4 Behavior hypothesis statement-example …………………………….. 60 5 Competing behavior pathway model-blank form ……………………. 61 6 Competing behavior pathway model-step one ………………………. 62 7 Competing behavior pathway model-step two ………………………. 63 8 Competing behavior pathway model-step three ……………………… 63 9 Functional communication-based intervention ………………………. 66 10 A multiple baseline design within- and across-participants comparisons for toileting accidents and self-initiated toileting behaviors ……... 118 viii ABSTRACT Far less is known about the effects of functional communication-based toileting interventions for students with developmental disabilities in a school setting. Furthermore, the currently available toileting interventions for students with disabilities include some undesirable procedures such as the use of punishment, unnatural clinic/university settings as opposed to more natural school/home settings, and prompt- based as opposed to communicative, self-initiating skills. The current study examined the effectiveness of FCT on the incidence of communicative, self-initiated toileting and of toileting accidents without any punishment components, which were often considered as necessary in traditional toileting procedures. A multiple baseline design was used for the concurrent measurement of the target behaviors across the participants with the random assignement of the paricipants to the FCT intervention. The results of this study indicated that the present FCT intervention was effective in teaching of communicative, self-initiated toileting behavior in a school setting for some students with developmental disabilities. It seemed to be that the effects of the FCT intervention without punishment might take longer than the intervention with punishment. Future studies may explore how much parent participation and each participant’s cognitive functioning level are related to the degree of increasing communicative, self-initiated toileting behavior. In addition, the future research may focus on FCT intervention without punishment components for individuals with other developmental disabilities. ix Chapter I Introduction This chapter will acquaint the reader with the literature on functional communication training (FCT), along with the rationale for the use of functional communication training (FCT) as a possible intervention to decrease or eliminate toileting accidents displayed by students with developmental disabilities in a school setting and to increase socially appropriate replacement behaviors such as communicative, self-initiated toileting behavior. First, the definition of challenging behaviors