Title the Identity of the Turkish Rulers to the South of Hindukush from The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title the Identity of the Turkish Rulers to the South of Hindukush from The The Identity of the Turkish Rulers to the South of Hindukush Title from the 7th to the 9th Centuries A.D. Author(s) INABA, Minoru Citation ZINBUN (2006), 38: 1-19 Issue Date 2006-03 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/48824 © Copyright March 2006, Institute for Research in Humanities Right Kyoto University. Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University ZINBUN 2005 No.38 The Identity of the Turkish Rulers to the South of Hindukush from the 7th to the 9th Centuries A.D.* Minoru IN ABA 1. The Tu rkish Rulers of Eastern Afghanistan At the beginning of the 1990 う 民 m a n y Bactrian documents were discovered in the northern area of Afghanistan which was still in the middle of a civil war. There is no doubt that those documents will ラtogether with the Bactrian inscription from Rabatak near 8urkh Kotal and Buddhist documents from the caves north of Bamiyan , help us to improve our understanding of the history う religion and the society of ancient Afghanistan. A number of those Bactrian documents have been introduced by N. 8ims- Williams with transliterations and translations うwhich will surely stimulate further research (β倒S臼 i m トs - W i ll i a m 2000) Just before that discovery ぅbeing inspired by 8h. K uwayama うs work on the history ofK 瓦pi 釘and the Gandh 瓦ra area prior to the Islamic period (K uwayama 1990) う I published a paper on the history of eastern Afghanistan , specially foュ cusi 時on Ghazni/Z 瓦bulistan from the 7th to the 8th century A. D ・ ぅscrutiniz­ ing materials available at that tilne (Inaba 1991). A framework of the history of that area during the period in question was deduced as follows: In the latter half of the 6th century , the Hephtalite empire in Tokh 瓦rist 瓦n collapsed due to Tu rkish attack うi.e. Western Tu Jue. Gandh 瓦ra , which had also been under the control of the Hephtalites うand K 瓦pi 釘which was adj acent to Gandh 瓦ra , were greatly affected by that event. The dynasty labeled the Khi 時alides by Kuwayama (or Nezakides by some scholars bωed on the leg- * I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Y. Yoshida and D r. A. Palumbo , who provided me with invaluable instruction and suggestions ぅand ぅas always , to D r. 8h. Kuwayama who has never failed to kindly and with great generousity discuss with me at great length. And Iam also grateful to Mr. Anthony R. Black for improving my English. 1 MINORD INABA end of the coins) had been established in K 瓦pisl and was exerting its rule over the K 瓦bul valley as far as Gandhara. When in the first half of the 7th century Xuanzang visited there うthe king of K 瓦pisl was of this lineage. In the 650 う h Arab Muslims reached as far as Slstan and intended to make their way further north うwhich resulted in considerable strategic importance being placed on the southern border of the K 瓦pisl kingdom うnamely K 瓦bu l. At that time , K 瓦bul was under the rule of the Turks who had been reported by Xuanzang to have lived in the mountain area between Z 瓦bulist 瓦nand K 瓦pi 釘 うthat is ヲFulishisa­ tangna 弗 栗 侍 薩 慎 那 . Gradually having extended their power ぅthey came to be independent and うeventually うdepri ved the Khingalide King of almost the whole of his territory. It was they who were referred to as the Turk Sah in the Islamic sources. In the 680 うs , a prince from K 瓦bul fled southward down to Z 瓦bulistan , probュ ably due to the conflict surrounding succession to the throne うand established his independence there (C f. K uwayama 1999). The new r 叫ers of Zabulist 瓦n were denoted in the records of Arab and Persian historians by the name ふ ん rtby l. It has been maintained that this title should be read ム ヂ o znbyl which might have some relation with the cult surrounding the God Zhun (如 n ii of Xua 四ang). Considering the Turkish situation mentioned above , however ぅthis title should be understood as a corrupted form of the Turkish title iltiibiir. 1 Thus うthe two kingdoms of Kabul and Z 瓦bulist 瓦n were of the same Turkish origin and both acted as an impregnable rampart against the Muslims for almost two centuries following. Nevertheless うthere remain several problems unsolved and unmentioned う one of which is the origin of those Tu rks. The Bactrian documents mentioned above and some archaeological findings of the area in question from the last century seem to indicate the Turkish tribe named the Khalaj as a possible candidate for the origin of those Turks. 2 The primary purpose of this paper is to verify this identification. As a matter of fact , the idea of identifying the Turks in question with the Khalaj tribe is not very recent. L. Petech (1964) already suggested this identification and referred to the expressions “ H e - d a - I u o - z h i 詞 達 羅 支 " and “Ge­ da-Iuo-zhi 葛達羅支 J うwhich appeared in Chinese sources. A. Rehman (1988) also connected the Turks of K 瓦bul and Zabulist 瓦n with the Khalaj utilizing the materials cited by J. Marquart (1 1 C f. Bombaci 1970: 59; Rehman 1988: 180; Inaba 1991: 53-55; Sims-Williams 2002: 235. 2 C f. Lee & Sims-Williams 2003; Verardi & Paparatti 2004; Inaba 2004. 2 THE IDENTITY OF THE TURKISH RULERS scholars may be , they seem not to have succeeded in examining it su 白ciently う as Petech never produced a comprehensive comparison of information from the Chinese sources and that of the Arabic and Persian sources うnor did Rehman bring material in the Chinese sources to light. However ぅY. Yoshida (2000 [2003]) recently has suggested the assumption that the Chinese Hedaluozhi and Gedaluozhi can be connected with the word “ k h a r a l a じ が う w h i c h appears on the legends of the N ezak S 瓦 h coins うconsidering the latter to be some kind of Indianized form of the word “Khalaj ." I will take this suggestion as my starting point. 2. Hedaluozhi To begin with うlet us consider the Chinese expressions Hedaluozhi and Gedaluozhi. However , since each has variants うit is first necessary to examine the expressions themselves to decide which should be taken as the correct form or whether there are multiple correct forms. To start with うlet us proceed with a passage from X· 初 旬ngshu Vo l. 221b: “ X i e y u 謝 周 目 li e s southwest of Tokh 瓦ristan. It was formerly called Caojuzha 漕 矩 陀 or Caoju 漕 矩but renamed Hedaluozhi in the Xianqing period. Empress Wu again changed the name to the present one. About 400 li to its east lies Jibin 厨 賓and to its northeast lies Bamiyan at almost the same distance. India lies to the south う Persia lies to the west and Guzgan lies northwards. The king resides in Hexina (鶴悉那 * y a k - s i t - n a ) which is 7 ぅ000 li wide. The king also sometimes resides in the Aponi (阿婆体九 - b u a - n i a ) castle. The land produces plenty of saffron and water springs ir 向ate the fields. People from Tu Jue , Jibin and Tokh 瓦rist 加 ( 吐 火 羅 ) live there. Jibin is recruiting young soldiers from this country to against protect the Arabs. They sent an envoy and presents in the 1st year of the Jingyun era (710 A.D.) and later subjugated themselves to Jibin. In the 8th year of Kaiyuan (720) うthe Emperor mandated Gedalωzhi xielifa Shiquer and made him the king They have sent several envoys until the Tianbao era. 門 Here three names for Zabulistan in the Tang period are mentioned , i.e. う Caojuzha , Hedaluozhi (Gedaluozhi) and Xieyu. The Chinese names applied to Z 瓦bulist 瓦n have been analyzed by Yoshida (Kuwayama 1992: 135-139) ぅac­ cording to whom Caojuzha and Xieyu , as well as Caoli (Xu g αoseng zhu α η う Vo l. 4) ぅ X i e y u e (Huilin yinyi う V o l. 100) and Zhewutl 刷tana (Xuany 仇yinyi う Vo l. 18) are transcriptions for *dz 瓦ul くZ 瓦b 叫-istan) うwhile Hedaluozhi and Gedal uozhi (and Gelωdazhi in the Jiu t α n g s h u ; see below) must have been 3 MINORD INABA transcriptions for a word completely di 百erent from *dz 瓦ul くZ 瓦bu l. As for the latter transcriptions , E. Chavannes (1969: 160 うn. 4) presumes that Hedaluozhi could be an erroneous transcription for Daluohezhi 達 羅 詞 支which might corュ respond to al- Rukhudh くal- Rukhkhaj appearing in Islamic sources , especially in geographical works written during the 9th and the 10th centuries うas a place name of southern Afghanistan around the present Qandahar. As mentioned above うPetech suggested connecting the form to Khalaj. While Kuwayama (1990: 253-54) , distinguishing Hedaluozhi from Gedaluozhi うsupposes the forュ mer to be a place name and the latter to be a kind of Turkish 0 日 c i a l title , the *Qarata 己i. Hedaluozhi also appears in the Zizhi tongjia 凡 V o l. 200: “On the day guiwei of the 6th month [of 661 ]う e i g h t dudufu and seventy-six zhou 州 had been placed in the sixteen countries ぅ i.e. Tl 山 lOluo (Tok 瓦ra) うYanda (Hephtal) ヲ Jibin ぅBosi (Persia) etc. 門 This account concerns the reorganization of Anxi duhufu and sixteen counュ tries in the West in the 1st year of Longshuo (661) ラwhich is discussed below.
Recommended publications
  • Eastern and Western Look at the History of the Silk Road
    Journal of Critical Reviews ISSN- 2394-5125 Vol 7, Issue 9, 2020 EASTERN AND WESTERN LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THE SILK ROAD Kobzeva Olga1, Siddikov Ravshan2, Doroshenko Tatyana3, Atadjanova Sayora4, Ktaybekov Salamat5 1Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 2Docent, Candidate of historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 3Docent, Candidate of Historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 4Docent, Candidate of Historical Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] 5Lecturer at the History faculty, National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. [email protected] Received: 17.03.2020 Revised: 02.04.2020 Accepted: 11.05.2020 Abstract This article discusses the eastern and western views of the Great Silk Road as well as the works of scientists who studied the Great Silk Road. The main direction goes to the historiography of the Great Silk Road of 19-21 centuries. Keywords: Great Silk Road, Silk, East, West, China, Historiography, Zhang Qian, Sogdians, Trade and etc. © 2020 by Advance Scientific Research. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.17 INTRODUCTION another temple in Suzhou, sacrifices are offered so-called to the The historiography of the Great Silk Road has thousands of “Yellow Emperor”, who according to a legend, with the help of 12 articles, monographs, essays, and other kinds of investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Religions and Religious Movements
    ISBN 978-92-3-103654-5 Introduction 2 RELIGIONS AND RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS H.-J. Klimkeit, R. Meserve, E. E. Karimov and C. Shackle Contents Introduction ....................................... 62 RELIGIONS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN ENVIRONMENT ............. 67 Turkic and Mongol beliefs, the Tibetan Bon religion and shamanism ......... 67 Religion among the Uighurs, Kyrgyz, Kitan ...................... 69 MANICHAEISM AND NESTORIAN CHRISTIANITY ............... 71 Manichaeism ...................................... 71 Nestorian Christianity .................................. 75 Zoroastrianism ..................................... 78 Hinduism ........................................ 82 THE ADVENT OF ISLAM: EXTENT AND IMPACT ................ 83 NON-ISLAMIC MYSTIC MOVEMENTS IN HINDU SOCIETY .......... 88 The Hatha-yoga movement ............................... 89 The bhakti movement .................................. 90 Birth of the Sikh religion ................................ 91 Introduction (H.-J. Klimkeit) Although cultural and religious life along the Central Asian Silk Route was determined both by various indigenous traditions, including Zoroastrianism, and by the world 62 ISBN 978-92-3-103654-5 Introduction religions that expanded into this area from India and China as well as from Syria and Per- sia, we can detect certain basic patterns that recur in different areas and situations.1 Here we mainly wish to illustrate that there were often similar geopolitical and social conditions in various oasis towns. The duality of such towns and the surrounding deserts, steppes and mountains is characteristic of the basic situation. Nomads dwelling in the steppes had their own social structures and their own understanding of life, which was determined by tra- ditions that spoke of forefathers and heroes of the past who had created a state with its own divine orders and laws. The Old Turkic inscriptions on the Orkhon river in Mongolia are a good case in point.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marginocentric Cultural Features of Cities Along the Great Silk Road in the Territory of Kazakhstan
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 20 (2018) Issue 2 Article 5 The Marginocentric Cultural Features of Cities along the Great Silk Road in the territory of Kazakhstan Ainura Kurmanaliyeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Nurlykhan Aljanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Mira Manassova Karaganda Economic University KazPotrebsoyuz Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Kurmanaliyeva, Ainura; Aljanova, Nurlykhan; and Manassova, Mira. "The Marginocentric Cultural Features of Cities along the Great Silk Road in the territory of Kazakhstan." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.2 (2018): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3236> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study
    The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study by Tim Williams on behalf of ICOMOS 2014 The Silk Roads An ICOMOS Thematic Study by Tim Williams on behalf of ICOMOS 2014 International Council of Monuments and Sites 11 rue du Séminaire de Conflans 94220 Charenton-le-Pont FRANCE ISBN 978-2-918086-12-3 © ICOMOS All rights reserved Contents STATES PARTIES COVERED BY THIS STUDY ......................................................................... X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... XI 1 CONTEXT FOR THIS THEMATIC STUDY ........................................................................ 1 1.1 The purpose of the study ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background to this study ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Global Strategy ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Cultural routes ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Serial transnational World Heritage nominations of the Silk Roads .................................................. 3 1.2.4 Ittingen expert meeting 2010 ........................................................................................................... 3 2 THE SILK ROADS: BACKGROUND, DEFINITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\My Documents\Sounds of Silk Booklet.Php
    Sounds of Silk an exhibit of Instruments and Textiles from Silk Road Cultures The Silk Road passed through Central Asia, linking China in the east to Iran and the Mediterranean to the west. Connecting pathways went north to Russia and south to India and Afghanistan. Central Asia was inhabited by nomadic and settled peoples whose lives revolved economically around the Silk Road. They also absorbed new ideas and influences through contact with incoming traders, travelers and conquerors. In this exhibition of Central Asian arts, you can see the legacy of the Silk Road in the blending of these foreign ideas with the existing cultural patterns of both nomadic and settled peoples. Funded in part by Utah Humanities Council, Utah Arts Council, and Salt Lake County Zoo Arts and Parks Program. Utah Humanities Council promotes understanding of human traditions, Studies reveal that it was monks who first brought cocoons to Byzantium from China in the year 555 A.D.; the cocoon trade spread from Byzantium to Greece and from there to Italy, Spain and France from the 7th Century onward. The caravans of merchants either followed the road leading to the Caspian Sea by passing through the Afghan valleys, or climbed the Karakorum Mountains and arrived in Anatolia via Iran. From Anatolia, the caravans proceeded to Europe either by sea or by the Silk Road that passed through the Thrace Region. During the time of the Mongols with Ghengiz Khan in the 13th and 14th centuries Marco Polo took the Silk Road to reach China. Even today, the Silk Road offers an extraordinary variety of historic and cultural riches.
    [Show full text]
  • EASAA 2005 Handbook of Papers and Panels
    EASAA 2005 Handbook of Papers and Panels List of Panels Mind the Gap: Continuity and Change in South Asian Archaeology (Monday July 4 2.00 – 5.00) Convenors: Prof. Robin Coningham (University of Bradford) & Dr. Ruth Young,( University of Leicester) Ethnoarchaeology in the Himalayas (Monday July 4 2.00 – 5.00) Convenors: Lindsay Zamponi (Ph.D Candidate, SOAS, London) and Dr. Tadeuz Skorupski (SOAS, London) Indo•Iranian Borderlands (Monday July 4 1.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Morteaza Hessari (National Museum of Iran) & Prof. Vasant Shinde (Deccan College, Pune) Technology, Regional Interaction and the Indus Civilisation (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Prof. Mark Kenoyer (University of Wisconsin•Madison) & Dr. Rita Wright (Deparment of Anthropology, New York University) The Temple in South Asia (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 5.00) Convenors: Dr. Adam Hardy (University of Cardiff) & Dr. Crispin Branfoot (De Montfort University) Issues in Gangetic Archaeology (Tuesday July 5 9.30 – 12.30) Convenor: Robert Harding (UCL Institute of Archaeology Numismatic, Literary and Epigraphic Evidence on Chronology in Gandhara (Tuesday July 6 9.30 – 5.00) Convenor: Dr. Osmund Bopearachchi (C.N.R.S.) Issues in Northwestern Art and Iconography (Tuesday July 5 2.00 – 5.00 Convenors: Dr. Martha L. Carter, Dr. Carolyn Schmidt Tibetan Epigraphy and Petroglyphs (Tuesday 5 July 2.00 – 5.00) Convenor: Dr. Philip Denwood (SOAS, London) Economies in South Asia (Wednesday July 6 9.30 – 4.30) Convenors: Dorian Q. Fuller: Institute of Archaeology, University College London & Dr. Richard Meadow: Director, Harappa Archaeological Project, Peabody Museum, Harvard University) The Hephthalites (Wednesday July 6 9.30 – 4.30) Convenors: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarihi Türk Sehri Balasagun Hakkinda Yeni Incelemeler
    TARİHİ TÜRK SEHRİ BALASAGUN HAKKİNDA YENİ İNCELEMELER VARİ S ABDURRAHMAN* Tarihi Türk şehri Balasagun Karahanlılar Devleti'nin başkentlerinden biri olup, eskiden beri Türk tarihindeki önemi itibariyle Türk kültürü araştırıcılarımn ilgisini çekmektedir. Ancak Balasagun hakkında yeterli bilgi veren orijinal kaynakların eksik olması, söz konusu şehir üzerine farklı görüşlerin ortaya atılmasına sebep olmuştur. Biz, elde mevcut yerli ve yabancı kaynaklardaki bilgilerin ışığında şimdiye kadar konuyla ilgili olarak yapılan çalışmaları da dikkate alarak, Balasagun şehrinin menşei, kuruluş tarihi, kurucuları ve sair hakkında yaptığım çalışmalar sonucu tespit ettiğimiz bazı hususları ortaya koymak istiyoruz. Balasagun şehrinin yerinin tespiti, Balasagun'la ilgili çalışmalardaki en önemli meselelerin biridir. Bu konuda yazılı kaynaklarda bazı ipuçları verilmiş ise de bir kısım araştırmacılar Arkeoloji ilminin eski şehirlerin tespiti konusunda sağladığı imkanlardanda, yararlanarak Balasagun'un ye- rini tespit etmeye çalıştı. Bunların başında meşhur Rus Türkolog W.Barthold gelmektedir. O, 20.yüzplın başında Orta Asya'daki Çu ve Talas Nehirleri kıyısında yaptığı çal ışmalar sonucu, söz konusu şehrin Ak-Beşim (Ak-Peşin) Harabelerinde kurulduğunu iddia ederek, Burana'nın Arapça- 'daki Manara'nın bozuk telaffuzu olduğunu savunuyor'. 1953-1955 yılları arasında Tokmak eski şehrinin Burana Harabesinde incelemelerde bulu- nan A.N.Bernştam, Ak-Beşim (Suyab) Kalesi'nin Balasagun olduğunu or- taya koyar2. P.N. Kojemyakov, Ak-Beşim Kalesi'nin haritasını çizdikten sonra Burana'nın IX.yüzyıla ait bir medeni yadigarlık olduğunu iddia eder. Kırgızistan ilimler Akademisi'nden W.D.Goryaçiva ise Burana'nın Balasagun olduğunu savunmaktadır3. Çinli araştırmacı Chang Kuang-ta da * Dr. Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü Öğretim Görevlisi. 1 W. Barthold, Orta Asya Türk Tarihi Hakkında Dersler (Çince Tercümesi), Pekin, 1984, s.83.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hephthalite Numismatics
    THE HEPHTHALITE NUMISMATICS Aydogdy Kurbanov 1. Introduction Arabic – Haital, Hetal, Heithal, Haiethal, Central Asia and neighbouring countries have a Heyâthelites. In Arabic sources the Hephtha- very old and rich history. A poorly-studied and in- lites, though they are mentioned as Haitals, tricate period of this region is the early medieval are sometimes also refered to as Turks. period (4th - 6th centuries AD). During this time, In the 4th - 6th centuries AD the territory of Cen- “The Great movement of peoples”, the migration tral Asia included at least four major political en- of nomadic peoples (Huns) from Asia to Europe, tities, among them Kushans, Chionites, Kidarites, took place. In South and Central Asia, great em- and Hephthalites. Discussions about the origins pires existed, including Sasanian Iran, Gupta and of these peoples still continue. Ideas vary from some small states. Across Central Asia, mysteri- the Hephthalites considered as part of the Hun ous new peoples appeared: the Hephthalites, the confederation to different other origins. It is also Kidarites and the Chionites, among others. Their uncertain whether the Hephthalites, the Kidarites origins are still debated. Some scholars suppose and the Chionites had a common or different ori- that they were part of a Hun confederation, while gins – that is, are they three branches of the same others suppose they had different origins. ethnic group or are they culturally, linguistically, Generally, the early research on the Hephthalites and genetically distinct from one another? was based only on written sources. They were The Hephthalites are well represented in their mentioned for the fi rst time in AD 361 at the siege coins.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Yuezhi - Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology”, by Hans Loeschner
    “Notes on the Yuezhi - Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology”, by Hans Loeschner Notes on the Yuezhi – Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology By Hans Loeschner Professor Michael Fedorov provided a rejoinder1 with respect to several statements in the article2 “A new Oesho/Shiva image of Sasanian ‘Peroz’ taking power in the northern part of the Kushan empire”. In the rejoinder Michael Fedorov states: “The Chinese chronicles are quite unequivocal and explicit: Bactria was conquered by the Ta-Yüeh-chih! And it were the Ta-Yüeh-chih who split the booty between five hsi-hou or rather five Ta-Yüeh-chih tribes ruled by those hsi-hou (yabgus) who created five yabguates with capitals in Ho-mo, Shuang-mi, Hu-tsao, Po-mo, Kao-fu”. He concludes the rejoinder with words of W.W. Tarn3: “The new theory, which makes the five Yüeh- chih princes (the Kushan chief being one) five Saka princes of Bactria conquered by the Yüeh- chih, throws the plain account of the Hou Han shu overboard. The theory is one more unhappy offshoot of the elementary blunder which started the belief in a Saka conquest of Greek Bactria”.1 With respect to the ethnical allocation of the five hsi-hou Laszlo Torday provides an analysis with a result which is in contrast to the statement of Michael Fedorov: “As to the kings of K’ang- chü or Ta Yüeh-shih, those chiefs of foreign tribes who acknowledged their supremacy were described in the Han Shu as “lesser kings” or hsi-hou. … The hsi-hou (and their fellow tribespeople) were ethnically as different from the Yüeh-shih and K’ang-chü as were the hou… from the Han.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan
    The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan George Fiske Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 George Fiske All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan George Fiske This study examines the socioeconomics of state formation in medieval Afghanistan in historical and historiographic terms. It outlines the thousand year history of Ghaznavid historiography by treating primary and secondary sources as a continuum of perspectives, demonstrating the persistent problems of dynastic and political thinking across periods and cultures. It conceptualizes the geography of Ghaznavid origins by framing their rise within specific landscapes and histories of state formation, favoring time over space as much as possible and reintegrating their experience with the general histories of Iran, Central Asia, and India. Once the grand narrative is illustrated, the scope narrows to the dual process of monetization and urbanization in Samanid territory in order to approach Ghaznavid obstacles to state formation. The socioeconomic narrative then shifts to political and military specifics to demythologize the rise of the Ghaznavids in terms of the framing contexts described in the previous chapters. Finally, the study specifies the exact combination of culture and history which the Ghaznavids exemplified to show their particular and universal character and suggest future paths for research. The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan I. General Introduction II. Perspectives on the Ghaznavid Age History of the literature Entrance into western European discourse Reevaluations of the last century Historiographic rethinking Synopsis III.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Hunnic Bullae from Northwest India
    Three Hunnic Bullae from Northwest India MICHAEL ALRAM This paper deals with three bullae which were The name appears in the nominative together found in Pakistan in 2004 and are now in a pri- with the customary title of ¶ri. However, ac- vate collection. All three are of fired clay. One cording to Harry Falk the name is of non- was probably attached to a string used to tie a Sanskrit origin; its linguistic background is document (no. 1, fig. 1) as can be seen from the unknown. little channel on the edge below the bust. The two others are irregular pyramid-shaped tokens According to Pierfrancesco Callieri’s icono- (no. 2, fig. 2; no. 3, fig. 3), with clearly visible fin- graphical classification—his book on “Seals and gerprints underneath, and were probably used to Sealings from the North-West of the Indian Sub- confirm the legitimate identity of the bearer.1 continent and Afghanistan” (Callieri 1997) is the Two of our bullae show the typical male bust leading publication on this topic—this type of representing a Hunnic nobleman, while the third portrait belongs to his Class II (Cat 7.27–35 and depicts a sun wheel (cakra) and can therefore also pp. 32–33) and Class III (Cat U 7.32).2 These be seen in a non-Hunnic context. The inscrip- pieces all belong to an early Hunnic group which tions are in Indian Brahmi and tell us the names can be localised to the area around Kapi¶a/Kabul of the owners of the seals.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Hunic Invaders of Central Asia That Influenced the History of India, China, and Eurasia, the Erection of Great Wall and Dark Period of Indian History
    Early Hunic Invaders of Central Asia that influenced the history of India, China, And Eurasia, the Erection of Great Wall and Dark Period of Indian History: By: Bipin Shah Dark Period of Indian history: During my world travel and visit to the Great Wall of China, I could not help wonder the real reasons for building such a massive wall at great cost of life and sacrifices? We always admire such monumental structure and cataloged them as “Great wonder of the world “. This and the pyramids are similar topics of the history that are often unknown to the public and never questioned or taught in the school. This type of subject not only intrigues me but compels me to investigate further. I decided to investigate further and found out how neatly this world event indirectly fits in to the puzzle of Indian subcontinent’s history, when Purana writers and the history keepers lost control of the Indian history and their genealogy of the Indian rulers. The Indian historian considers this to be the dark period of Indian history that began with the fall of Mauryan Empire and lasted until the rise of Gupta Empire. This is a total period of 500 to 550 years. During this period of uncertainty, India witnessed a massive influx of the foreign tribes from its borderland that was displaced as a result of chain reaction that started in the Northern China. India unwittingly became a melting pot of various ancient ethnicities during this “dark period” of the Indian history for which much remains unknown. Purana dismisses this event with one simple sentence: “Mlechha will rule India.” A similar melting process is now taking place in countries like America, Australia, Canada and South America but in a peaceful and orderly ways and the key driver for modern migration is the same that is just “economics”.
    [Show full text]