2019 Oklahoma Native Plant Record
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Winged Sumac T
32Southern SOIL 32 Coppice of winged sumac T. Davis Snydor, Ohio State University a growing food movement Native Plant Highlight: Winged Sumac Rhus copallinum by Amy Carter, Coastal Plains Chapter, Georgia Native Plant Society Description Rhus copallinum or winged sumac is a deciduous upright shrub that can be a colorful addition to your landscape. Other common names include shining su- mac, flameleaf sumac, dwarf sumac, wing-rib sumac, black sumac, and upland sumac. Winged Sumac gets its name from the winged stalk between leaflets. Unlike poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix), for which it is often mistaken, it is not a skin irritant. A member of the cashew family, this sumac is considered a large shrub or small tree usually growing to about 10 feet although it can reach heights of 20 to 35 feet or more in good soils. It has a small, short trunk with open branching. The shiny green leaves of winged sumac are pinnately compound, 33 alternate and spiral up stems. Leaflet mar- gins are usually entire (or serrate), elliptic to lanceolate in shape, 3-8 cm long, and 1-3 cm wide. Leaves turn a shiny bright red in the fall. Unlike other sumacs winged sumac Leaf with winged rachis Vern Wilkins, Indiana University has a watery sap. Male and female flowers usually occur on separate trees so both are necessary for fertile seed produc- tion. Flowers occur in showy greenish-white clusters during summer months. Fruits occur in a panicle and are small and covered with fine hairs. They occur in red to reddish brown pyramidal clusters on the female tree and persist on the plants through the winter into spring. -
Invasive Plants of the Southeast Flyer
13 15 5 1 19 10 6 18 8 7 T o p 2 0 I n v a s i v e S p e c i e s 1. Chinese Privet, Ligustrum sinense 2. Nepalese Browntop, Microstegium vimineum 3. Autumn Olive, Elaeagnus umbellata 4. Chinese Wisteria, Wisteria sinensis & Japanese Wisteria, W. floribunda 5. Mimosa, Albizia julibrissin 6. Japanese Honeysuckle, Lonicera japonica 7. Amur Honeysuckle, Lonicera maackii 8. Multiflora Rose, Rosa multiflora 9. Hydrilla, Hydrilla verticillata 10. Kudzu, Pueraria montana 11. Golden Bamboo, Phyllostachys aurea 12. Oriental Bittersweet, Celastrus orbiculatus 13. English Ivy, Hedera helix 14. Tree-of-Heaven, Ailanthus altissima 15. Chinese Tallow, Sapium sebiferum 16. Chinese Princess Tree, Paulownia tomentosa 17. Japanese Knotweed, Polygonum cuspidatum 18. Silvergrass, Miscanthus sinensis 19. Thorny Olive, Elaeagnus pungens 20. Nandina, Nandina domestica The State Botanical Garden of Georgia and The Georgia Plant Conservation A l l i a n c e d e f i n i t i o n s you can help n a t i ve Avoid disturbing natural areas, including clearing of native vegetation. A native species is one that occurs in a particular region, ecosystem or habitat Know your plants. Find out if plants you without direct or indirect human action. grow have invasive tendencies. Do not use invasive species in landscaping, n o n - n a t i ve restoration, or for erosion control; use (alien, exotic, foreign, introduced, plants known not to be invasive in your area. non-indigenous) A species that occurs artificially in locations Control invasive plants on your land by beyond its known historical removing or managing them to prevent natural range. -
Native Trees of Georgia
1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W. -
Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus. -
Management of the Viburnum Leaf Beetle at the Morris Arboretum
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Internship Program Reports Education and Visitor Experience 2017 Management of the Viburnum Leaf Beetle at the Morris Arboretum Anna Giesmann University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_internreports Part of the Botany Commons, and the Horticulture Commons Recommended Citation Giesmann, Anna, "Management of the Viburnum Leaf Beetle at the Morris Arboretum" (2017). Internship Program Reports. 10. https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_internreports/10 An independent study project report by The John J. Willaman & Martha Haas Valentine Endowed Plant Protection Intern (2016-2017) This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_internreports/10 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Management of the Viburnum Leaf Beetle at the Morris Arboretum Abstract Pyrrhalta viburni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), or the viburnum leaf beetle (VLB), is an invasive pest on viburnums in North America, where native species of the plant have little natural resistance. Resistance can be conferred by leaf texture, leaf chemistry, or a wound response that crushes VLB eggs. The beetle does not immediately kill host plants, but repeated defoliation is fatal after several years. Because viburnum is a common forest and landscape plant in the eastern United States, VLB is a serious concern. The Morris Arboretum has a large collection of viburnums, including many native and non-native species. While VLB had already been observed in passing, this project included a thorough baseline survey of VLB damage throughout the Arboretum. Data were collected for the number of twigs infested with VLB, the number of cavities on each twig, and whether a wound response had been produced. -
The Evolution of Photosynthetic Anatomy in Viburnum (Adoxaceae) Author(S): David S
The Evolution of Photosynthetic Anatomy in Viburnum (Adoxaceae) Author(s): David S. Chatelet, Wendy L. Clement, Lawren Sack, Michael J. Donoghue, and Erika J. Edwards Source: International Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 174, No. 9 (November/December 2013), pp. 1277-1291 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673241 . Accessed: 04/12/2013 16:54 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Plant Sciences. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 164.67.185.184 on Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:54:04 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Int. J. Plant Sci. 174(9):1277–1291. 2013. ᭧ 2013 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2013/17409-0007$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/673241 THE EVOLUTION OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC ANATOMY IN VIBURNUM (ADOXACEAE) David S. Chatelet,1,* Wendy L. Clement,† Lawren Sack,‡ Michael J. Donoghue,§ and Erika J. Edwards* *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Box G-W, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA; †Department of Biology, College of New Jersey, 2000 Pennington Road, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, USA; ‡Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Charles E. -
NJ Native Plants - USDA
NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana -
Rusty Blackhaw, Which Has Clusters of Five- Petaled Flowers and Dark Fruit
Helping People Help The Land March/April 2011 Issue No. 8 The Reverchon Naturalist Recognizing the work of French botanist Julien Reverchon, who began collecting throughout the North Central Texas area in 1876, and all the botanists/naturalists who have followed ... tems has occurred. Harvesting is just the first step, Blackland Prairie Harvest and once we get the precious seed back to the farm the Story by Znobia Wootan cleaning process begins. With the use of old peanut Native American Seed Company trailers, we managed to shift the large quantity of seed from barn to barn until it was able to go through the ative Prairies once covered 40 percent of the seed cleaning process. Cleaning the seed is a tricky N United States extending from Canada to the Gulf process, the object is to remove as much of the leaves of Mexico. Now, 99 percent of the 142-million acres and stems as possible without losing the lightest and of native habitat is gone. Because the rich soils are smallest of the seeds. The seeds are sifted through ideally suited for agriculture, the vast North American different sized screens until the quality product is ob- Tallgrass Prairie has been either cultivated or paved tained. over to accommodate human expansion. Only 1 per- cent remains within isolated, small remnants, and of After the cleaning process is finished, samples are this remaining 1 percent only .004 percent is in Texas. taken and sent to independent laboratories to confirm what our farm crew already knew. We found this har- The rarest of all the prairie ecosystems is the Black- vest of Blackland Prairie Mix has a unique diverse land Prairie. -
IDENTIFYING OAKS: the HYBRID PROBLEM by Richard J
. IDENTIFYING OAKS: THE HYBRID PROBLEM by Richard J. Jensen I Anyone who has spent time trying to identify oaks (Quercus spp.), especially in the for ests of eastern North America, has encountered trees that defy classification into any of the recognized species. Such trees commonly are treated as putative hybrids and often are taken as evidence that species of oaks are not as discrete as species in other groups. On the other hand, some (e.g., Muller, 1941) have argued that many, if not most, putative hybrids are nothing more than stump sprouts or aberrant individuals of a species. Muller (1941) did not deny the existence of hybrids; he was cautioning against an inflated view of the frequency of hybridization as a result of cavalier claims. As he put it (Muller, 1951), 'The freedom of hybridization ascribed to oaks is immensely overrated." While I don't disagree with these sentiments, I do believe that hybrids are a common component of forests throughout North America. Virtually all oak species in North America have been claimed to produce hybrids with one or more related species. Hardin (1975j presented a diagram illustrating hybrid combina tions for the common white oak (Quercus alba L.) and Fig. 1 provides a similar view for northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). Because these two species have very broad geo graphical ranges and come in contact with a large number of related taxa, there is ample opportunity for hybrid combina- RUB tions to arise naturally. These two examples also reflect the fact that MAR coc instances of hybridization are re stricted to taxa within a section: Quercus section Quercus (the white and chestnut oaks) and ELL IU Quercus section Lobatae (the red and black oaks), respectively. -
VIBURNUM SHRUBS Arrowwood Viburnum Dentatum Mapleleaf Viburnum Acerifolium Blackhaw Viburnum Prunifolium Rusty Blackhaw Viburnum Rufidulum Nannyberry Viburnum Lentago
VIBURNUM SHRUBS Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum Mapleleaf Viburnum acerifolium Blackhaw Viburnum prunifolium Rusty blackhaw Viburnum rufidulum Nannyberry Viburnum lentago he viburnum shrubs native to the Midwest include the five species listed above. Mapleleaf is the shortest in height at 4 feet with the nannyberry T the tallest at 20 to 30 feet. All are typically grown as shrubs yet the nannyberry and blackhaw viburnum can be Arrowwood grown as a single -trunk or multi-trunk small tree. Viburnum shrubs are found from the East Coast to the eastern Great Plains and from Canada south to Georgia and East Texas. These shrubs make for excellent restoration plants providing wildlife with food and cover. Their white blooms in the spring are showiest when the shrubs receive ample sunshine. Viburnums will tolerate shade better than most deciduous shrubs but in the shade they flower and fruit less than they do in the sun. Viburnums prefer moist but well-drained soil and are Arrowwood commonly found in the wild on the edges of woodlands, in woodland openings and in a mixed woodland as an understory plant. Viburnum dentatum (Arrowwood) is a hardy reliable shrub that grows well where some shade is present. It has multiple upright branches growing to 8 to 10 feet and has a dense habit. It is commonly planted in residential and commercial landscape where a tall deciduous shrub is needed for screening and especially in areas where some shade is present. There are numerous varieties of arrowood viburnum that have been developed by plant breeders that feature shorter sizes and heavier fruiting. -
2020 Plant List Index: Trees & Shrubs Pg
2020 Plant List Index: Trees & Shrubs pg. 2-7 Perennials pg. 7-13 Grasses pg. 14 Ferns pg. 14-15 Vines pg. 15 Hours: May 1 – June 30: Tues.- Sat. 10 am - 6 pm Sun.11 am - 5 pm 3351 State Route 37 West www.sciotogardens.com On Mondays by appointment Delaware, OH 43015 Phone/fax: 740-363-8264 Email: [email protected] Sustainable, earth-friendly growth and maintenance practices: Real Soil = Real Difference. All plants are container-grown in a blend of local soil and compost. Plants are grown outside year-round. They are always in step with the seasons. Minimal pruning ensures a well-rooted, healthy plant. Use degradableRoot Pouch andcontainers. recycled containers to reduce waste. Use of controlled-release fertilizers minimizes leaching into the environment. Our primary focus is on native plants. However, non-invasive exotics are an equally important part of the choices we offer you. There is great creative opportunity using natives in combination with exotics. Adding more native plants into our landscapes provides food and habitat for wildlife and connections to larger natural areas. AdditionalAdditional species species may may be be available. available. Email Email oror call for currentcurrent availability, availability, sizes, sizes, and and prices. prices. «BOT_NAME» «BOT_NAME»Wetland Indicator Status—This is listed in parentheses after the common name when a status is known. All species «COM_NAM» «COM_NAM» «DESCRIP»have not been evaluated. The indicator code is helpful in evaluating«DESCRIP» the appropriate habitat for a -
Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6