The RSC in Stratford, 2014 HEATON, Caroline Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) At

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The RSC in Stratford, 2014 HEATON, Caroline Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) At View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive Revolting Women, Roaring Girls and Bloody Men: The RSC in Stratford, 2014 HEATON, Caroline Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/14379/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version HEATON, Caroline (2016). Revolting Women, Roaring Girls and Bloody Men: The RSC in Stratford, 2014. Masters, Sheffield Hallam University. Repository use policy Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in SHURA to facilitate their private study or for non- commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Revolting Women, Roaring Girls and Bloody Men: The RSC in Stratford, 2014 Caroline Louise Heaton A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Master of English by Research September 2016 Abstract Revolting Women, Roaring Girls and Bloody Men: The RSC in Stratford, 2014 Caroline Louise Heaton, September 2016 Master of English by Research, Sheffield Hallam University The Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) states that its purpose is to produce “an inspirational artistic programme each year, setting Shakespeare in context, alongside the work of his contemporaries and today’s writers” (2016, online). This purpose has remained largely unchanged since the company's inception in 1961, as has its commitment to maintaining its Stratford-upon-Avon home as the primary base for the delivery of its artistic programme. Within the context of Gregory Doran’s assumption of the Artistic Directorship of the company in 2013, this thesis provides an academic appraisal of the Stratford-upon-Avon productions contained within Doran’s first summer programme as Artistic Director, in 2014. The purpose of this analysis is to explore the ways in which Doran sought to meet the RSC’s continuing stated purpose, as a leading publicly-funded arts institution in the twenty-first century. The Stratford-upon-Avon season from March to October 2014 incorporated all three of the RSC’s play categories, across three performance spaces: Shakespeare in the Royal Shakespeare Theatre (Henry IV Parts 1 and 2, and The Two Gentlemen of Verona), Shakespeare’s contemporaries in the Swan Theatre (badged as the Roaring Girls season), and new writing in The Other Place at the Courtyard Theatre (in a short season entitled Midsummer Mischief). The season thus provided a suitable focus for this critical analysis. THE ROYAL SHAKESPEARE COMPANY (2016). About us. [online]. Available at https://www.rsc.org.uk/about-us/. Last accessed 25 July. Candidate’s Statement The primary purpose of this thesis is to carry out an academic appraisal of the Royal Shakespeare Company's theatrical productions in Stratford-upon- Avon in the summer of 2014, with a view to assessing the company's approach to fulfilling its stated aim of producing dynamic, distinctive, and inspiring theatre which incorporates Shakespeare, his contemporaries, and new writers. The work takes account of the impact of the new Artistic Directorship of Gregory Doran at the Company, from 2013. I hereby declare that this thesis is my own individual work and effort, and that this work has been produced for the sole purpose of submission in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University’s Master of English by Research, and has not been submitted for any other qualification or award. No assistance has been received in the production of the content of this thesis and the work has not been submitted anywhere else for any award. Where other sources of information have been used, they have all been acknowledged, and all citable sources are listed within the Bibliography. Caroline Louise Heaton September 2016 Contents Introduction: “Screw your courage to the sticking place” i 1 ACT I - What’s in a name? The RSC in Stratford, 1961 – 2016 1.1 What is past is prologue 1 1.2 I am not bound to please thee with my answer 5 1.3 Suit the action to the word, the word to the action 8 1.4 All the world’s a stage 15 ACT II - Bloody Men in The Royal Shakespeare Theatre 17 2.1 False face must hide what the false heart doth know 17 2.2 How bitter a thing it is, to look into happiness through 34 another man’s eyes ACT III - Roaring Girls in the Swan Theatre 45 3.1 Pleasure and action make the hours seem short 47 3.2 Conscience is a word that cowards use 59 3.3 When sorrows come, they come not single spies, but in 72 battalions 3.4 Alas, I am a woman friendless, hopeless 85 ACT IV - Revolting Women in The Other Place 91 ACT V - The wheel is come full circle 106 Bibliography 115 Introduction 1 “Screw your courage to the sticking place” Established in Stratford-upon-Avon by Peter Hall in 1961, at a time when “state patronage of the arts was in the ascendant” (Chambers, 2004, p.xi), the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) was radical in its intention to become “Britain’s first large-scale, permanent repertoire company” (Chambers, 2004, p.ix). It “turned a star-laden, six-month Shakespeare festival into a monumental, year-round operation built around a permanent company” (Billington 1993, p.133). The RSC’s stated purpose was, and remains, to “stage the work of Shakespeare, his contemporaries and the most exciting new writers and performers of today, making every play an event”, and creating “dynamic and distinctive theatre” (RSC About Us, 2015, online). The new (2016) purpose also refers to the intention to produce an “inspirational artistic programme” (RSC About Us, 2016, online). In Studying Shakespeare in Performance (2011), John Russell Brown suggests that writing about plays in performance has gradually become “an accepted and often industrious academic pursuit” (p.5). This thesis therefore analyses the on-stage work of the RSC in Stratford, in an attempt to appraise the performance output in the summer of 2014 and evaluate the degree to which it fulfilled its mission to be dynamic, distinctive, and inspirational. The period of March to October 2014 saw the first summer season under the Artistic Directorship of Gregory Doran. It incorporated all three elements of the RSC’s play categories: Shakespeare (Henry IV Parts 1 and 2, and The Two Gentlemen of Verona) in the Royal Shakespeare Theatre; Shakespeare’s contemporaries (badged as the Roaring Girls season) in the 1 Macbeth, 1.7 (66-7) i Swan Theatre; and new writing (in a short season entitled ‘Midsummer Mischief’) in The Other Place at the Courtyard Theatre, thus providing a suitable focus for this critical analysis.1 The productions directed by Doran (Henry IV Parts 1 and 2, and The Witch of Edmonton) aimed to provide a strong visual representation of the Early Modern period, with their major emphasis being on the plight of the male protagonists at the heart of each piece. Conversely, the Midsummer Mischief productions, along with Arden of Faversham and The White Devil, were in modern dress and their key focus was on the conversations between their female protagonists and women in the twenty-first century. The Roaring Girl featured a modern-day female ‘hero’ caught in the Victorian era, and The Two Gentlemen of Verona was set in a stylish twentieth-century society in which women were attempting to contribute to the evolution of gendered roles. Each production had a number of distinctive elements, as part of a comprehensive season with a variety of directorial styles. It therefore offered a good an indication of the potential range of the RSC’s repertoire. Act I of this thesis provides a background to the 2014 season, by considering the RSC’s Artistic Directorships from 1961 to 2013. It also briefly explores the types of audiences which the company attracts, and how it fares in comparison to its leading London competitors. Act II provides reviews of the ‘bloody men’ productions in the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, and Act III analyses the ‘roaring girls’ who dominated the offerings in the Swan Theatre. Act IV explores the ‘revolting women’ who voiced their opinions in The Other Place, and Act V, provides reflections on the degree to which these productions were successful in meeting their intentions to offer dynamism, distinction, and inspiration. 1 Summer 2014 season announcement available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwVwimPjJRw ii ACT I 1 “What’s in a name?” : The RSC in Stratford, 1961 - 2016 1.1 “What is past is prologue”: Peter Hall to Adrian Noble (1961 – 2003) When Sir Peter Hall established the company in 1961, a key feature of its identity was its commitment to the principle of the ensemble, which it says is made by “working together with trust and mutual respect over sustained periods of time”, enabling actors and directors to “experiment and develop our craft” and “gain a deeper understanding of each other and of the plays”, with the intended result that “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts” (RSC 2015, About Us, online). Trevor Nunn described this commitment as demonstrating an identification with “the whole enterprise instead of just with a new production; the sense that we were committed to improve, to become more expert” (O’Mahoney 2005, online).
Recommended publications
  • Stage by Stage South Bank: 1988 – 1996
    Stage by Stage South Bank: 1988 – 1996 Stage by Stage The Development of the National Theatre from 1848 Designed by Michael Mayhew Compiled by Lyn Haill & Stephen Wood With thanks to Richard Mangan and The Mander & Mitchenson Theatre Collection, Monica Sollash and The Theatre Museum The majority of the photographs in the exhibition were commissioned by the National Theatre and are part of its archive The exhibition was funded by The Royal National Theatre Foundation Richard Eyre. Photograph by John Haynes. 1988 To mark the company’s 25th birthday in Peter Hall’s last year as Director of the National October, The Queen approves the title ‘Royal’ Theatre. He stages three late Shakespeare for the National Theatre, and attends an plays (The Tempest, The Winter’s Tale, and anniversary gala in the Olivier. Cymbeline) in the Cottesloe then in the Olivier, and leaves to start his own company in the The funds raised are to set up a National West End. Theatre Endowment Fund. Lord Rayne retires as Chairman of the Board and is succeeded ‘This building in solid concrete will be here by the Lady Soames, daughter of Winston for ever and ever, whatever successive Churchill. governments can do to muck it up. The place exists as a necessary part of the cultural scene Prince Charles, in a TV documentary on of this country.’ Peter Hall architecture, describes the National as ‘a way of building a nuclear power station in the September: Richard Eyre takes over as Director middle of London without anyone objecting’. of the National. 1989 Alan Bennett’s Single Spies, consisting of two A series of co-productions with regional short plays, contains the first representation on companies begins with Tony Harrison’s version the British stage of a living monarch, in a scene of Molière’s The Misanthrope, presented with in which Sir Anthony Blunt has a discussion Bristol Old Vic and directed by its artistic with ‘HMQ’.
    [Show full text]
  • King and Country: Shakespeare’S Great Cycle of Kings Richard II • Henry IV Part I Henry IV Part II • Henry V Royal Shakespeare Company
    2016 BAM Winter/Spring #KingandCountry Brooklyn Academy of Music Alan H. Fishman, Chairman of the Board William I. Campbell, Vice Chairman of the Board BAM, the Royal Shakespeare Company, and Adam E. Max, Vice Chairman of the Board The Ohio State University present Katy Clark, President Joseph V. Melillo, Executive Producer King and Country: Shakespeare’s Great Cycle of Kings Richard II • Henry IV Part I Henry IV Part II • Henry V Royal Shakespeare Company BAM Harvey Theater Mar 24—May 1 Season Sponsor: Directed by Gregory Doran Set design by Stephen Brimson Lewis Global Tour Premier Partner Lighting design by Tim Mitchell Music by Paul Englishby Leadership support for King and Country Sound design by Martin Slavin provided by the Jerome L. Greene Foundation. Movement by Michael Ashcroft Fights by Terry King Major support for Henry V provided by Mark Pigott KBE. Major support provided by Alan Jones & Ashley Garrett; Frederick Iseman; Katheryn C. Patterson & Thomas L. Kempner Jr.; and Jewish Communal Fund. Additional support provided by Mercedes T. Bass; and Robert & Teresa Lindsay. #KingandCountry Royal Shakespeare Company King and Country: Shakespeare’s Great Cycle of Kings BAM Harvey Theater RICHARD II—Mar 24, Apr 1, 5, 8, 12, 14, 19, 26 & 29 at 7:30pm; Apr 17 at 3pm HENRY IV PART I—Mar 26, Apr 6, 15 & 20 at 7:30pm; Apr 2, 9, 23, 27 & 30 at 2pm HENRY IV PART II—Mar 28, Apr 2, 7, 9, 21, 23, 27 & 30 at 7:30pm; Apr 16 at 2pm HENRY V—Mar 31, Apr 13, 16, 22 & 28 at 7:30pm; Apr 3, 10, 24 & May 1 at 3pm ADDITIONAL CREATIVE TEAM Company Voice
    [Show full text]
  • National-Theatre-Rep-Brochure-May-Oct-2019.Pdf
    May – Oct 19 How to book The plays Online Select your own seat online nationaltheatre.org.uk By phone 020 7452 3000 Mon – Sat: 9.30am – 8pm In person South Bank, London, SE1 9PX Mon – Sat: 9.30am – 11pm Other ways Friday Rush to get tickets £20 tickets are released online every Friday at 1pm for the following week’s performances. Hansard ‘Master Harold’… The Secret River Playing from 22 Aug and the boys 22 Aug – 7 Sep Day Tickets Playing from 21 Sep £18/£15 tickets available in person on the day of the performance. No booking fee online or in person. A £3 fee per Access symbols used in this brochure transaction for phone bookings. If you choose to have your CAP Captioned Relaxed Performance tickets sent by post, a £1.50 fee applies per transaction. TT Touch Tour Postage costs may vary for group and overseas bookings. AD Audio-Described The National Theatre The National Theatre in partnership with in partnership with Mr Gum and Jellyfish Translations the Dancing Bear – 5 – 16 July Playing from 15 Oct the Musical! 25 July – 31 Aug Partner for Innovation Partner for Learning Founding corporate Outdoor Media Partner supporter for Public Acts Official Airline Partner Official Hotel Partner Official Transport Provider International Hotel Partner Small Island Rutherford and Son Peter Gynt Your carrier to the USA and beyond Playing until 10 Aug 16 May – 3 Aug 27 June – 8 Oct Supporter for new writing Official Sound Partner of Cloud Services Partner Pouring Partner the Olivier Theatre Sponsor of NT Live in the UK Follies Top Girls River Stage Playing until 11 May Playing until 20 July 5 July – 3 Aug 2 3 A UGUST Thu 22 7.30 Fri 23 7.30 Sat 24 7.30 Hansard Mon 26 7.30 Tue 27 7.30 a new play by Simon Woods Wed 28 7.30 Thu 29 7.30 Fri 30 7.30 Sat 31 7.30 SEPTEMBER Mon 2 7.30 Tue 3 7.00 Wed 4 7.30 Wed 11 7.30 Thu 12 7.30 Cast includes Hansard; noun Fri 13 7.30 Lindsay Duncan The official report of all parliamentary debates.
    [Show full text]
  • Casting Announced for the Uk Premiere of the Realistic Joneses
    PRESS RELEASE - Monday 16 December 2019 IMAGES CAN BE DOWNLOADED here Twitter/ Facebook / website CASTING ANNOUNCED FOR THE UK PREMIERE OF THE REALISTIC JONESES ▪ WILL ENO’S AWARD-WINNING THE REALISTIC JONESES, CITED IN NUMEROUS BEST PLAY LISTS FOLLOWING ITS BROADWAY PREMIERE, WILL BE STAGED AT THEATRE ROYAL BATH’S USTINOV STUDIO FOR SPRING 2020 ▪ FULL CAST INCLUDES COREY JOHNSON, SHARON SMALL, JACK LASKEY AND CLARE FOSTER ▪ THE REALISTIC JONESES WILL RUN FROM 6 FEBRUARY TO 7 MARCH 2020 AND IS DIRECTED BY SIMON EVANS Theatre Royal Bath Productions has today announced casting for the UK premiere of Will Eno’s Drama Desk Award winning play The Realistic Joneses which will be staged in the Ustinov Studio from Thursday 6 February to Saturday 7 March 2020 with opening night for press on Wednesday 12 February 2020. The full cast includes Corey Johnson as Bob, Sharon Small as Jennifer, Jack Laskey as John and Clare Foster as Pony. The production is directed by Simon Evans. The Realistic Joneses is a hilarious, quirky and touching portrait of marriage, life and squirrels, by American playwright Will Eno. Seen on Broadway in 2014, the play received a Drama Desk Special Award, was named one of the ‘25 best American plays since Angels in America’ by the New York Times, Best Play on Broadway by USA Today and best American play of 2014 by the Guardian. In a suburban backyard, one bucolic evening, Bob and Jennifer Jones and their new neighbours John and Pony Jones find they have more in common than their identical homes and last name.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Eras, Two Men, One Value: Fides in Modern Performances of Shakespeare’S
    Three Eras, Two Men, One Value: Fides in Modern Performances of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra Depictions of Marc Antony and Caesar Augustus have changed dramatically between the first and twenty-first centuries, partially because of William Shakespeare’s seventeenth-century play Antony and Cleopatra. In 2006 and 2010, England’s Royal Shakespeare Company staged vastly different interpretations of this classically influenced Shakespearean text. How do the modern performances rework ancient views of Antony and Augustus, particularly in light of the ancient Roman value fides (loyalty or good faith)? This paper answers that question by examining the intersections between Greco-Roman literary-historic narratives – as received in Shakespeare’s early modern play – and the two modern performances. The contemporary versions of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra create contrasting constructions of Antony and Augustus by modernizing the characters and/or their worlds. The 2006 rendition (directed by Gregory Doran) presents an explosive but weak-willed Antony (Sir Patrick Stewart) and a prudish yet petulant Augustus (John Hopkins). On the other hand, the 2010 adaptation (directed by Michael Boyd) shows a hotheaded and frank Antony (Darrell D’Silva) who struggles against a cold and manipulative Augustus (John Mackay). Both performances reveal the complexity of these ancient figures as the men engage with and evaluate claims upon their familial, societal, and personal fides. Representations of Antony and Augustus necessarily involve fides, though classical accounts do not always feature this term. As military and political leaders, both men led lives filled with decisions about loyalty, specifically what deserved it and in what degree. The modern dramatizations further underscore fides in their portrayals of Antony and Augustus.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage
    William Shakespeare on Film, Video and Stage Titles in bold red font with an asterisk (*) represent the crème de la crème – first choice titles in each category. These are the titles you’ll probably want to explore first. Titles in bold black font are the second- tier – outstanding films that are the next level of artistry and craftsmanship. Once you have experienced the top tier, these are where you should go next. They may not represent the highest achievement in each genre, but they are definitely a cut above the rest. Finally, the titles which are in a regular black font constitute the rest of the films within the genre. I would be the first to admit that some of these may actually be worthy of being “ranked” more highly, but it is a ridiculously subjective matter. Bibliography Shakespeare on Silent Film Robert Hamilton Ball, Theatre Arts Books, 1968. (Reissued by Routledge, 2016.) Shakespeare and the Film Roger Manvell, Praeger, 1971. Shakespeare on Film Jack J. Jorgens, Indiana University Press, 1977. Shakespeare on Television: An Anthology of Essays and Reviews J.C. Bulman, H.R. Coursen, eds., UPNE, 1988. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon Susan Willis, The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography Kenneth S. Rothwell, Neil Schuman Pub., 1991. Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen Lorne M. Buchman, Oxford University Press, 1991. Shakespeare Observed: Studies in Performance on Stage and Screen Samuel Crowl, Ohio University Press, 1992. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television Anthony Davies & Stanley Wells, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue 2013
    Evropa Film Akt et L’AAFEE présentent L’Europe autour de l’Europe Festival de films européens 8ème édition Mémoire et devenir Du 13 mars au 14 avril 2013 Cinéma l’Entrepôt Auditorium Jean XXIII Centre Culturel Irlandais Centre Culturel de Serbie Centre Culturel Italien Cité Nationale de l’Histoire de l’Immigration Door Studio Institut Hongrois de Paris / Cinéma V4 Fondation Hippocrène Galerie Italienne Goethe-Institut de Paris Institut Culturel Italien de Paris L’Adresse Musée de La Poste La Filmothèque du Quartier Latin La Pagode Le Musée du Montparnasse Maison d’Europe et d’Orient Maison des Associations du 14e Moulin d’Andé Studio des Ursulines www.evropafilmakt.com Direction et sélection – Irena Bilić Coordination générale – Magdalena Petrović Vermeulen Production et logistique – Pablo Gleason González • Liste de diffusion et newsletter – Yvan Fischer • Assistant communication – Mauro Zanon • Coordination invités – Ivanka Polchenko Myers • Assistant Antoine Gilloire Attachées de presse / Promotion – Les Piquantes Documentation, site et catalogue – Marie-Noëlle Vallet assistée de Ivanka Polchenko Myers et Pablo Gleason • Traduction et sous-titrage – Marie-Noëlle Vallet, François Minaudier, Irena Bilić • Sous-titrage électronique – VOSTAO Designer – Julia Kosmynina • Conception graphique – Studio Shweb • Web-master – Alexandre Grebenkov Création statuette Prix Sauvage – Anđela Grabež Coordination Irlande – Sheila Pratschke Allemagne – Gisela Rueb • Azerbaïdjan – Eliza Pieter et Christine Blumauer • Danemark – Gitte Neergård Delcourt
    [Show full text]
  • Two Day Autograph Auction Day 1 Saturday 02 November 2013 11:00
    Two Day Autograph Auction Day 1 Saturday 02 November 2013 11:00 International Autograph Auctions (IAA) Office address Foxhall Business Centre Foxhall Road NG7 6LH International Autograph Auctions (IAA) (Two Day Autograph Auction Day 1 ) Catalogue - Downloaded from UKAuctioneers.com Lot: 1 tennis players of the 1970s TENNIS: An excellent collection including each Wimbledon Men's of 31 signed postcard Singles Champion of the decade. photographs by various tennis VG to EX All of the signatures players of the 1970s including were obtained in person by the Billie Jean King (Wimbledon vendor's brother who regularly Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, attended the Wimbledon 1972, 1973 & 1975), Ann Jones Championships during the 1970s. (Wimbledon Champion 1969), Estimate: £200.00 - £300.00 Evonne Goolagong (Wimbledon Champion 1971 & 1980), Chris Evert (Wimbledon Champion Lot: 2 1974, 1976 & 1981), Virginia TILDEN WILLIAM: (1893-1953) Wade (Wimbledon Champion American Tennis Player, 1977), John Newcombe Wimbledon Champion 1920, (Wimbledon Champion 1967, 1921 & 1930. A.L.S., Bill, one 1970 & 1971), Stan Smith page, slim 4to, Memphis, (Wimbledon Champion 1972), Tennessee, n.d. (11th June Jan Kodes (Wimbledon 1948?), to his protégé Arthur Champion 1973), Jimmy Connors Anderson ('Dearest Stinky'), on (Wimbledon Champion 1974 & the attractive printed stationery of 1982), Arthur Ashe (Wimbledon the Hotel Peabody. Tilden sends Champion 1975), Bjorn Borg his friend a cheque (no longer (Wimbledon Champion 1976, present) 'to cover your 1977, 1978, 1979 & 1980), reservation & ticket to Boston Francoise Durr (Wimbledon from Chicago' and provides Finalist 1965, 1968, 1970, 1972, details of the hotel and where to 1973 & 1975), Olga Morozova meet in Boston, concluding (Wimbledon Finalist 1974), 'Crazy to see you'.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Translation on the London Stage: Terminology and (In)Visibility
    Indirect translation on the London stage: terminology and (in)visibility Geraldine Brodie* Centre for Translation Studies, University College London, UK *[email protected] Abstract Productions of translated plays on the London stage use a variety of terms to describe the interlingual interpretive process that has taken place between the source text and the performance. Most frequently, a translated play is described as a “version” or “adaptation”, with the term “translation” reserved for specialized productions. The translation method most commonly adopted is to commission a source-language expert to prepare a “literal” translation which is then used by an English-speaking theatre practitioner to produce a playscript for performance. This article examines the incidence of such indirect translation practices, the inconsistencies of the applied terminology, and the relevance for indirect translation in its wider sense, revealing the shadows of translational behaviour even within language pairs, and demonstrating the multiplicity of agents impacting on the ultimate appearance of a text in translation. Keywords: adaptation, literal translation, London theatre, theatre translation, version, indirect translation Introduction Translation is a collaborative exercise, incorporating a range of participants and stages in the trajectory between originating and ultimate texts. The romantic concept of the solitary, omniscient translator – Jerome, the patron saint of translators, alone in the desert with his bible and skull – is no longer apposite, if it ever were. The writer of the “letter of Aristeas” in around 130 BCE depicted seventy-two translators creating the early-third-century Septuagint translation of the Hebrew scripture, “making all details harmonize by mutual comparison” – although this was disputed by later authors, who preferred to ascribe the translation of sacred texts to divine inspiration (Robinson 2014, 4–5).
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    BAM 2013 Winter/Spring Season Brooklyn Academy of Music BAM, the Royal Shakespeare Company, Alan H. Fishman, and The Ohio State University present Chairman of the Board William I. Campbell, Vice Chairman of the Board Adam E. Max, Julius Vice Chairman of the Board Karen Brooks Hopkins, President Joseph V. Melillo, Caesar Executive Producer Royal Shakespeare Company By William Shakespeare BAM Harvey Theater Apr 10—13, 16—20 & 23—27 at 7:30pm Apr 13, 20 & 27 at 2pm; Apr 14, 21 & 28 at 3pm Approximate running time: two hours and 40 minutes, including one intermission Directed by Gregory Doran Designed by Michael Vale Lighting designed by Vince Herbert Music by Akintayo Akinbode Sound designed by Jonathan Ruddick BAM 2013 Winter/Spring Season sponsor: Movement by Diane Alison-Mitchell Fights by Kev McCurdy Associate director Gbolahan Obisesan BAM 2013 Theater Sponsor Julius Caesar was made possible by a generous gift from Frederick Iseman The first performance of this production took place on May 28, 2012 at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Leadership support provided by The Peter Jay Stratford-upon-Avon. Sharp Foundation, Betsy & Ed Cohen / Arete Foundation, and the Hutchins Family Foundation The Royal Shakespeare Company in America is Major support for theater at BAM: presented in collaboration with The Ohio State University. The Corinthian Foundation The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation Stephanie & Timothy Ingrassia Donald R. Mullen, Jr. The Fan Fox & Leslie R. Samuels Foundation, Inc. Post-Show Talk: Members of the Royal Shakespeare Company The Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund Friday, April 26. Free to same day ticket holders The SHS Foundation The Shubert Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder in the Mews the Adventure of Johnnie Waverly the Adventure Of
    The Adventure of the Clapham 8-Jan-89 Captain Hastings Cook Inspector Japp Miss Lemon Murder in the Mews 15-Jan-89 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Adventure of Johnnie 22-Jan-89 Captain Hastings Waverly Inspector Japp Miss Lemon Four and Twenty Blackbirds 29-Jan-89 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Third Floor Flat 5-Feb-89 Captain Hastings The Third Floor Flat 5-Feb-89 Inspector Japp Miss Lemon Triangle at Rhodes 12-Feb-89 Problem at Sea 19-Feb-89 Captain Hastings The Incredible Theft 26-Feb-89 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The King of Clubs 12-Mar-89 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp The Dream 19-Mar-89 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon [edit] Series Two (1990) Title UK Airdate Recurring Cast Peril at End House 7-Jan-90 Captain Hastings (feature-length) Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Veiled Lady 14-Jan-90 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Lost Mine 21-Jan-90 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Cornish Mystery 28-Jan-90 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Disappearance of Mr. 4-Feb-90 Captain Hastings Davenheim Inspector Japp Miss Lemon Double Sin 11-Feb-90 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon Double Sin 11-Feb-90 The Adventure of the Cheap 18-Feb-90 Captain Hastings Flat Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Kidnapped Prime Minister 25-Feb-90 Captain Hastings Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Adventure of the Western 4-Mar-90 Captain Hastings Star Inspector Japp Miss Lemon The Mysterious Affair at Styles 16-Sep-90 Captain Hastings (feature-length) Inspector Japp
    [Show full text]
  • Some Thoughts Surrounding 2016Production of the Tempest
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DSpace at Waseda University Some thoughts surrounding 2016 production of The Tempest UMEMIYA Yu The following note shows the result of an on going research on the play by William Shakespeare: The Tempest. The 2016 production at the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC), one of the leading theatre companies in England, demonstrated another innovative version of the play on their main stage in Stratford-upon-Avon, followed by its tour down to Barbican theatre in London in 2017. It did not include an extraordinary interpretation or unique casting pattern but demonstrated the extended development of technology available on stage. This note introduces the feature and the reception of the production in the latter half, with a brief summary of the play and a survey of the performance history of The Tempest in the first half. The story of The Tempest Compared to other plays by Shakespeare, The Tempest is a rare example that follows the classical idea of three unities of time, place and action, deriving from 1 Aristotle, then prescribed by Philip Sydney in Renaissance England . The similar 2 structure has already practiced in The Comedy of Errors in 1594 , but while this early comedy is often described as a simple farce, The Tempest contains various complications in terms of plots and theatrical possibilities. The story of The Tempest opens with a storm at sea, conjured by the magic of Prospero, the main character of the play. He is manipulating the tempest from the 一二七nearby island where he lives with his daughter, Miranda, and shares the land with two other fantastic creatures, Ariel and Caliban.
    [Show full text]