In Response to Heidegger's Plea: Alētheia and the Open Space For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Response to Heidegger's Plea: Alētheia and the Open Space For Maine State Library Digital Maine Academic Research and Dissertations Maine State Library Special Collections 2018 In Response to Heidegger’s Plea: Alētheia and the Open Space for Thinking and Freedom Through Art Louise Carrie Wales Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/academic IN RESPONSE TO HEIDEGGER’S PLEA: ALĒTHEIA AND THE OPEN SPACE FOR THINKING AND FREEDOM THROUGH ART Louise Carrie Wales Submitted to the faculty of The Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy July 2018 i Accepted by the faculty of the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________________ CHRISTOPHER YATES, PHD. Doctoral Committee ______________________________ SIMONETTA MORO, PHD. ______________________________ DREW DALTON, PHD. 17 July 2018 ii © 2018 Louise Carrie Wales ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii … poetically man dwells on this earth. Friedrich Hölderlin Ô mon corps, fait toujours de moi [une femme] qui s'interroge. Frantz Fanon To Chloë: Thank you for always keeping me humble. I love you more than you can ever know. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS - There are many thanks to give. So many, in fact, that I fear a significant and influential someone will be overlooked. That said, I must begin by thanking Dr. Christopher Yates whose patient and detailed guidance have made this entire process enjoyable. I can confidently say that this project would not exist without his tutelage and time. Seriously. Chris has been kind, gentle, thorough (o.m.g. so fabulously thorough) and his turn around time on drafts is proof the man never sleeps. Ever. He also has a gentle humility that make him an invaluable mentor, particularly when ideas are challenging and clarity is not easily won. I am also grateful to my other committee members, Simonetta Moro and Drew Dalton, whose care and support I appreciate immensely. Then, of course, there is the inimitable and ever-supportive Dr. George Smith without whom I would not have joined the IDSVA family in the first place. As all of us here know, George has a contagious love for philosophy, art and his growing Becoming Community. His teaching is motivating and engaging. It’s also downright fun. Who can forget ‘a tergo’ or his impassioned descriptions of Degas’ Keyhole Nudes. The Venus of Urbino is forever etched in my mind as are the colorful descriptions of Titian’s greater impact on trans-historical narratives. To Amy Curtis, Howard Caygill, Paul Armstrong, Ted Coons, David Driskell … thank you for your constant inspiration. To my papa: thank you for instilling your intellectual curiosity in me. Your kindness and love have been very helpful. In addition, I have the best possible study group: Christina Barber, Mike Adams, Wilson Hurst and Taliesin Thomas. I thank each one of you for the laughs, the chats, the occasional venting, the tremendous love and the great getaway to Lopez Island. My students, both at SCAD and UNIS, have been watching as I put together what, to them, seems an endless task. Their collective love and support has kept my humor alive in moments of technological frustration—mostly born in my utter disdain for Microsoft Word. My friends … you definitely know who you are: all who have supported me throughout this adventure, thank you. Most importantly, I am and always will be grateful to my daughter Chloë whose cheerleading and enthusiasm for this project has helped me stay focused. With love, always. v ABSTRACT Louise Carrie Wales IN RESPONSE TO HEIDEGGER’S PLEA: ALĒTHEIA AND THE OPEN SPACE FOR THINKING AND FREEDOM THROUGH ART This dissertation is a response to Martin Heidegger’s call to action asserted at the conclusion of his oft-cited essay, “The Question Concerning Technology,” in which he offers the realm of art as the mainspring for our emancipation from the grip of technological enframing. The following chapters investigate artists Martha Rosler, Christian Boltanski, Krzysztof Wodiczko and finally, collaborators Noor Mirza and Brad Butler, whose artworks offer a counterbalance to the erosion of the human capacity for thought as a particular feature of our Being, or Dasein, as proposed by Heidegger. Their shared characteristic lies in truth’s manifestation within artworks as happenings or events rather than a quest for fixed certainty or correspondence. Through their work, the artists catalyze a reckoning, compelling the viewer to question and reflect on his intersubjective ethical responsibility for the other. The common thread connecting them is a powerful shifting of thought — in a distinctly revelatory acting upon the viewer’s awareness. I will argue that, as technological aesthetic narratives are increasingly sophisticated and nuanced, politically conscious artists such as these become better able to harness their potential voices in deeply critical ways allowing the inter-subjective ethos of care to manifest and thrive in dialogic expressions of truth. vi Furthermore, they begin to formulate a way of considering and using technology that not only resists enframing by interrogating the very essence of our relationship with it, but also functions as a way of engaging with the question of Being itself (which encompasses Heidegger’s fundamental project). In the end, this dissertation will demonstrate that Being comes to itself in the site of exchange as his/her awareness of responsibility grows and thought is returned to its poetical dwelling. In these times of narrowed perspectives and technological addiction qua enframing, Heidegger’s call to action and the works responding to it must be brought to the fore and celebrated. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction Chapter One: Heidegger’s articulation of Care in “The Question Concerning Technology” - 27 § 1.1: Introduction 31 § 1.2: Heidegger’s themes and undercurrents 46 § 1.3: Ethical foundations in the “Question Concerning Technology” 68 § 1.4: Thinking versus action and Heidegger’s involvement with Nazism 75 § 1.5: Summary and conclusion Chapter Two: Walter Benjamin and the disruptive reproduction - 77 § 2.1: Introduction 83 § 2.2: Building on Marxist foundations 100 § 2.3: Cult value versus durability: shifting the path to freedom 116 § 2.4: Film qua distraction of the masses as distinct from Marxist leisure 127 § 2.5: The persistence of fascist tendencies: fiat ars, pereat mundus 132 § 2.6: The politicization of art 145 § 2.7: Summary and conclusion Chapter Three: Martha Rosler: Bringing the War Home: Ethico-political collaborative art practice - 150 § 3.1: Introduction 157 § 3.2: Contextual conditions shaping Rosler’s ideas and practice 173 § 3.3: Rosler as Artist-Producer and the deciphering of meaning 188 § 3.4: Ethico-Political reading of Rosler’s visual work 202 § 3.5: Rosler’s Garage Sales: class performance and participation 215 § 3.6: Summary and conclusion viii Chapter Four: Fashioning truth from fiction and memory: The essence of truth interpreted through the work of Boltanski + Wodiczko - 220 § 4.1: Introduction 224 § 4.2: The space of truth and memory 240 § 4.3: Christian Boltanski: context, memory and the work of art 273 § 4.4: Krzysztof Wodiczko: truth, temporality and fearless speech 292 § 4.5: Summary and conclusion Chapter Five: Technologized truth: The ambiguity of truth / non-truth in the work of Mirza + Butler - 297 § 5.1: Introduction 306 § 5.2: Post-memory, discourse and intertextuality: the path forward 327 § 5.3: Past-present: Mumbai terror attacks 337 § 5.4: A close reading 370 § 5.5: Summary and conclusion 377 Conclusion - 390 Endnotes - 396 Works Cited - 414 Appendices - Appendix A: A genealogy of ethics on the threshold of Heidegger’s “The Question Concerning Technology.” Appendix B: Benjamin + Heidegger on language as the origin of meaning Appendix C: Genealogy of South Asian history: the ambiguity of truth / non-truth in the work of Mirza + Butler ix INTRODUCTION: “The meditative man is to experience the untrembling heart of unconcealment.” Martin Heidegger - § I.1: A CALL TO ACTION This dissertation concerns the human capacity for thinking—both in its relationship to what Martin Heidegger terms Dasein and, ultimately, in light of our primordial intersubjective ethical disposition. Furthermore, it addresses human access to truth through the realm of art—a truth that is multiple and fluid rather than objectivist and correspondent. It is, more directly, an inter-textual response to Martin Heidegger’s call to action asserted at the conclusion of his oft-cited essay, “The Question Concerning Technology,” in which he offers the realm of art as the mainspring for our emancipation from the grip of technological enframing. Inspired by Friedrich Hölderlin’s poem, Patmos, Heidegger writes, Because the essence of technology is nothing technological, essential reflection upon technology and decisive confrontation with it must happen in a realm that is, on the one hand, akin to the essence of technology and, on the other, fundamentally different from it. Such a realm is art. But certainly only if reflection upon art, for its part, does not shut its eyes to the constellation of truth, concerning which we are questioning. (Krell 340 emphasis mine) Heidegger leaves us with these thoughts after having detailed the ultimate reduction of human beings to standing reserve, or, perhaps more significantly, the reduction of human 1 creativity (in technē) to modes of challenging-forth. In other words, working from the language of Karl Marx, he asserts an essential self-alienation arising from our relationship with technology. Furthermore, he establishes that this relational imprisonment assails Dasein’s ability to exercise its most profound capacity within the unfettered open space of thinking. The greatest peril, in his estimation, lies in a false sense of wellbeing that prompts us to overlook the danger, hence his notice of the ‘absence of emergency’—a condition of Being Santiago Zabala expands upon in his recent volume Why Only Art Can Save Us.
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Deconstruction
    A GUIDE TO DECONSTRUCTION January 2003 Prepared by: Bradley Guy, Associate Director University of Florida Center for Construction and Environment M. E. Rinker, Sr., School of Building Construction College of Design, Construction and Planning 101 FAC PO Box 115703 Gainesville, FL 32611-5703 [email protected] And Eleanor M. Gibeau, Environmental Specialist Resource Management Group, Inc. 1143 Central Avenue Sarasota, FL 34236 [email protected] This “Guide for Deconstruction” was made possible by a grant to Charlotte County Florida from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Innovative Recycling Grant Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.........................................................................................................7 Deconstruction Overview...................................................................................9 Safety First ...................................................................................................................9 Survey ..........................................................................................................................9 Environmental Health and Compliance ........................................................................9 Asbestos Abatement ..................................................................................................10 Contracts and Specifications......................................................................................10 Historic Preservation ..................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 'New Era' Should Have Ended US Debate on Beijing's Ambitions
    Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on “A ‘China Model?’ Beijing’s Promotion of Alternative Global Norms and Standards” March 13, 2020 “How Xi Jinping’s ‘New Era’ Should Have Ended U.S. Debate on Beijing’s Ambitions” Daniel Tobin Faculty Member, China Studies, National Intelligence University and Senior Associate (Non-resident), Freeman Chair in China Studies, Center for Strategic and International Studies Senator Talent, Senator Goodwin, Honorable Commissioners, thank you for inviting me to testify on China’s promotion of alternative global norms and standards. I am grateful for the opportunity to submit the following statement for the record. Since I teach at National Intelligence University (NIU) which is part of the Department of Defense (DoD), I need to begin by making clear that all statements of fact and opinion below are wholly my own and do not represent the views of NIU, DoD, any of its components, or of the U.S. government. You have asked me to discuss whether China seeks an alternative global order, what that order would look like and aim to achieve, how Beijing sees its future role as differing from the role the United States enjoys today, and also to address the parts played respectively by the Party’s ideology and by its invocation of “Chinese culture” when talking about its ambitions to lead the reform of global governance.1 I want to approach these questions by dissecting the meaning of the “new era for socialism with Chinese characteristics” Xi Jinping proclaimed at the Communist Party of China’s 19th National Congress (afterwards “19th Party Congress”) in October 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodily Vulnerability: Critical Phenomenology and an Examination of Gendered Motility Tayler Bunge Regis University
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Spring 2016 Bodily Vulnerability: Critical Phenomenology and an Examination of Gendered Motility Tayler Bunge Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Bunge, Tayler, "Bodily Vulnerability: Critical Phenomenology and an Examination of Gendered Motility" (2016). All Regis University Theses. 703. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/703 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University Regis College Honors Theses Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments Several chapters of this book were initially presented as lectures at various institutions or conferences, and many were subsequently published in ear- lier versions in different journals or collections. They all benefited enor- mously from the conversations that followed these lectures and the suggestions received from various editors and copyeditors. All but the Conclusion were significantly rewritten for this volume. Parts of the Introduction were presented at a special session at the Modern Language Association (MLA) in December 2005 at the invita- tion of Claudia Brodsky. Chapter 1 was first presented in January 2005 at the Alliance Franc¸aise in Chicago at the invitation of Norah Delaney and published in SubStance ࠻106, 34, no. 1 (2005): 6–17. Parts of Chap- ter 2 were presented at a conference organized by Tanja Sta¨hler in June 2005 at the University of Sussex. Chapter 3, first presented at the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (SPEP) in October 2006, and then in April 2007 at Marquette University at the invitation of Pol Vandervelde, and then again in October 2007 at Northern Arizona Uni- versity at the invitation of Julie Piering, was published in The New Cen- tennial Review 7, no. 2 (Fall 2007): 21–42. Chapter 4 was first presented at Slippery Rock College at the invitation of Bernie Freydberg and Rich- ard Findler and was published in Theory & Event 8, no. 1 (2005): 1–19. Chapter 5, first presented in February 2005 at the Tate Museum in Lon- don at the invitation of Simon Glendinning and then at the Midwest meeting of the American Philosophical Association (APA) in Chicago in xi April 2005, at a session organized by Penelope Deutscher, was published in Derrida’s Legacies, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Depopulation: on the Logic of Heidegger's Volk
    Research research in phenomenology 47 (2017) 297–330 in Phenomenology brill.com/rp Depopulation: On the Logic of Heidegger’s Volk Nicolai Krejberg Knudsen Aarhus University [email protected] Abstract This article provides a detailed analysis of the function of the notion of Volk in Martin Heidegger’s philosophy. At first glance, this term is an appeal to the revolutionary mass- es of the National Socialist revolution in a way that demarcates a distinction between the rootedness of the German People (capital “P”) and the rootlessness of the modern rabble (or people). But this distinction is not a sufficient explanation of Heidegger’s position, because Heidegger simultaneously seems to hold that even the Germans are characterized by a lack of identity. What is required is a further appropriation of the proper. My suggestion is that this logic of the Volk is not only useful for understanding Heidegger’s thought during the war, but also an indication of what happened after he lost faith in the National Socialist movement and thus had to make the lack of the People the basis of his thought. Keywords Heidegger – Nazism – Schwarze Hefte – Black Notebooks – Volk – people Introduction In § 74 of Sein und Zeit, Heidegger introduces the notorious term “the People” [das Volk]. For Heidegger, this term functions as the intersection between phi- losophy and politics and, consequently, it preoccupies him throughout the turbulent years from the National Socialist revolution in 1933 to the end of WWII in 1945. The shift from individual Dasein to the Dasein of the German People has often been noted as the very point at which Heidegger’s fundamen- tal ontology intersects with his disastrous political views.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporality and Historicality of Dasein at Martin Heidegger
    Sincronía ISSN: 1562-384X [email protected] Universidad de Guadalajara México Temporality and historicality of dasein at martin heidegger. Javorská, Andrea Temporality and historicality of dasein at martin heidegger. Sincronía, no. 69, 2016 Universidad de Guadalajara, México Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=513852378011 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Filosofía Temporality and historicality of dasein at martin heidegger. Andrea Javorská [email protected] Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Eslovaquia Abstract: Analysis of Heidegger's work around historicity as an ontological problem through the existential analytic of Being Dasein. It seeks to find the significant structure of temporality represented by the historicity of Dasein. Keywords: Heidegger, Existentialism, Dasein, Temporality. Resumen: Análisis de la obra de Heidegger en tornoa la historicidad como problema ontológico a través de la analítica existencial del Ser Dasein. Se pretende encontrar la estructura significativa de temporalidad representada por la historicidad del Dasein. Palabras clave: Heidegger, Existencialismo, Dasein, Temporalidad. Sincronía, no. 69, 2016 Universidad de Guadalajara, México Martin Heidegger and his fundamental ontology shows that the question Received: 03 August 2015 Revised: 28 August 2015 of history belongs among the most fundamental questions of human Accepted:
    [Show full text]
  • Beauvoir on Gender, Oppression, and Freedom
    24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy Beauvoir on Gender, Oppression, and Freedom 1. Introduction: Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) Beauvoir was born in Paris and studied philosophy at the Sorbonne. She passed exams for Certificates in History of Philosophy, General Philosophy, Greek, and Logic in 1927, and in 1928, in Ethics, Sociology, and Psychology. She wrote a graduate diplôme (equivalent to an MA thesis) on Leibniz. Her peers included Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Jean-Paul Sartre. In 1929, she took second place in the highly competitive philosophy agrégation exam, barely losing to Jean-Paul Sartre who took first (it was his second attempt at the exam). At 21 years of age, Beauvoir was the youngest student ever to pass the exam. She taught in high school from 1929-1943, and then supported herself on her writings, and co-editorship of Le Temps Modernes. She is known for her literary writing, and her philosophical work in existentialism, ethics, and feminism. She published The Second Sex in 1949. 2. Gender ‘One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman. No biological, psychological or economic fate determines the future that the human female presents in society.’ (II.iv.1) A. What is a woman? “Tota mulier in utero: she is a womb,” some say. Yet speaking of certain women, the experts proclaim, “They are not women,” even though they have a uterus like the others. Everyone agrees there are females in the human species; today, as in the past, they make up about half of humanity; and yet we are told that “femininity is in jeopardy”; we are urged, “Be women, stay women, become women.” So not every female human being is necessarily a woman… (23) So there seems to be a sort of contradiction in our ordinary understanding of women: not every female is a woman, otherwise they would not be exhorted to be women.
    [Show full text]
  • The Male Gaze Interpretive Guide
    Interpretive Guide & Hands-on Activities The Alberta Foundation for the Arts Travelling Exhibition Program The Male Gaze The Alberta Foundation for the Arts Travelling Exhibition Program The Interpretive Guide The Art Gallery of Alberta is pleased to present your community with a selection from its Travelling Exhibition Program. This is one of several exhibitions distributed by The Art Gallery of Alberta as part of the Alberta Foundation for the Arts Travelling Exhibition Program. This Interpretive Guide has been specifically designed to complement the exhibition you are now hosting. The suggested topics for discussion and accompanying activities can act as a guide to increase your viewers’ enjoyment and to assist you in developing programs to complement the exhibition. Questions and activities have been included at both elementary and advanced levels for younger and older visitors. At the Elementary School Level the Alberta Art Curriculum includes four components to provide students with a variety of experiences. These are: Reflection: Responses to visual forms in nature, designed objects and artworks Depiction: Development of imagery based on notions of realism Composition: Organization of images and their qualities in the creation of visual art Expression: Use of art materials as a vehicle for expressing statements The Secondary Level focuses on three major components of visual learning. These are: Drawings: Examining the ways we record visual information and discoveries Encounters: Meeting and responding to visual imagery Composition: Analyzing the ways images are put together to create meaning The activities in the Interpretive Guide address one or more of the above components and are generally suited for adaptation to a range of grade levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Marratto Associate Professor of Philosophy Humanities Department Michigan Technological University Contact Information •
    MARRATTO :: CURRICULUM VITAE (UPDATED 10 AUG 18) SCOTT MARRATTO ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY CONTACT INFORMATION • Humanities Department Michigan Technological University 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton, MI 49931-1295 • Phone: (906) 487-2613 • Email: [email protected] • Web: http://www.mtu.edu/humanities/department/faculty-staff/faculty/marratto/ AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AND COMPETENCE • AOS: 19th and 20th Century Continental Philosophy (especially Phenomenology), Social and Political Philosophy • AOC: Philosophy of Science and Technology, Ethics, Ancient Philosophy, Aesthetics, Philosophy of Mind ACADEMIC POSITIONS • Associate Professor of Philosophy, Humanities Department, Michigan Technological University, 2011-present • Director of Graduate Studies in Rhetoric, Theory and Culture, Humanities Department, Michigan Technological University, 2015-2018 • Senior Fellow, Foundation Year Programme, University of King’s College, Halifax, 2010- 2011 • Instructor, Contemporary Studies Programme, University of King’s College, Halifax, 2009-2011 • Teaching Fellow, Foundation Year Programme, University of King’s College, Halifax, 2007-2010 EDUCATION • University of Guelph, PhD, Philosophy (2010) • University of Guelph, MA, Philosophy (2005) • University of Toronto, Special/Non-degree, Philosophy (2001-2) • University of Western Ontario, BA, Sociology (2001) 1 MARRATTO :: CURRICULUM VITAE (UPDATED 10 AUG 18) PUBLICATIONS Books • The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (2012). o Reviews: Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy, March (2013); Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, February (2013); Review of Metaphysics 67 (2013); Avant V (2014); Word and Text: A Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics 3 (2013). • The End of Ethics in a Technological Society. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queens University Press (2008). (With Lawrence E. Schmidt.) Book Chapters • “Intercorporeality.” In 50 Concepts for an Intersectional Phenomenology, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We All Really Have It? Loving Gaze As an Anti-Oppressive Beauty
    The Perfect Bikini Body: Can We All Really Have It? Loving Gaze as an Anti-Oppressive Beauty Ideal Forthcoming in Thought: A Journal of Philosophy (please cite the final version) Abstract In this paper I ask whether there is a defensible philosophical view according to which every body is beautiful. I review two purely aesthetical versions of this claim. The No Standards View claims that every body is maximally and equally beautiful. The Multiple Standards View encourages us to widen our standards of beauty. I argue that both approaches are problematic. The former fails to be aspirational and empowering, while the latter fails to be sufficiently inclusive. I conclude by presenting a hybrid ethical-aesthetical view according to which everybody is beautiful in the sense that every body can be perceived through a loving gaze (with the exception of evil individuals who are wholly unworthy of love). I show that this view is inclusive, aspirational and empowering, and authentically aesthetical. As soon as the summer season approaches, the internet is inundated with articles and slideshows with such titles as: “37 Totally Perfect Bikini Bodies. Rule No.1: there are no rules”1 or “9 Stunning Bodies That Shatter Society’s Stereotypes About the ‘Perfect’ Body”.2 These popular articles are ultimately grounded in the feminist imperative of dismantling sexist and oppressive aesthetic norms that harm women3 in a myriad of ways, among which: damaging their self-esteem and affecting their psychological and physical health, exposing 1 https://www.buzzfeed.com/kirstenking/all-your-perfect- imperfections?utm_term=.aoxkvwvz2#.qwJzDJD9G Last accessed on 02/16/2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Being and Time
    Heidegger's Being and Time 1 Karsten Harries Heidegger's Being and Time Seminar Notes Spring Semester 2014 Yale University Heidegger's Being and Time 2 Copyright Karsten Harries [email protected] Heidegger's Being and Time 3 Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Ontology and Fundamental Ontology 16 3. Methodological Considerations 30 4. Being-in-the-World 43 5. The World 55 6. Who am I? 69 7. Understanding, Interpretation, Language 82 8. Care and Truth 96 9. The Entirety of Dasein 113 10. Conscience, Guilt, Resolve 128 11. Time and Subjectivity 145 12. History and the Hero 158 13. Conclusion 169 Heidegger's Being and Time 4 1. Introduction 1 In this seminar I shall be concerned with Heidegger's Being and Time. I shall refer to other works by Heidegger, but the discussion will center on Being and Time. In reading the book, some of you, especially those with a reading knowledge of German, may find the lectures of the twenties helpful, which have appeared now as volumes of the Gesamtausgabe. Many of these have by now been translated. I am thinking especially of GA 17 Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung (1923/24); Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2005) GA 20 Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (1925); History of the Concept of Time, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1985) GA 21 Logik. Die Frage nach der Wahrheit (1925/26). Logic: The Question of Truth, trans. Thomas Sheehan GA 24 Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1927); The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Heidegger and Derrida: on the Impossible Futures of Techne
    KIR KUIKEN Between Heidegger and Derrida: On the Impossible Futures of Techne This paper is not the first to interrogate the term “legacies” in the title of this conference, implying as it does the vast problems of inheritance, of debt and even of mourning. A conference on the “Legacies of Theory” necessarily provokes a meditation on the notion of “legacy” itself. What I do not wish to take issue with in this term is what is implied by the plural: “legacies.” If the concept of “legacy” implies inheritance, then there is the possibility of inheritance only where its contingencies are multiple, contested and even contradictory. This multiplicity is in fact the precondition of inheriting, its very chance or possibility. What I do want to contest, however, is a certain relation to time that the term “legacies” implies. At a moment when the term “post-theory” has entered the academic lexicon, and when books with titles such as Life After Theory (Derrida et al.)1 have begun to mark its retreat or displacement within the institution, the term “legacies” risks collusion with a discourse that seeks to extirpate any real encounter with its “legacy,” multiple, contested or otherwise. And if I might be permitted to replace the term “theory” with the term “deconstruction,” the problematic nature of the concept of “legacy” makes itself clearer. Insofar as the term “legacy” implies a certain “temporality of presence,” with a clear, single, undivided border 1 The book contains an interview with Derrida, who addresses the question of “what comes after” theory very differently than the other contributors.
    [Show full text]