Hypnotherapy Journal Issue 2 Vol 10 Summer 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE HypnotHerapy Journal Issue 2 Vol 10 www.hypnotherapists.org.uk Summer 2010 Clinical outcomes Measurement Burden or Therapeutic tool? Supervisors Friend or foe? language Impact on reality private practice extravaganza returns! The lighter side Solihull, 19th June 2010 - Details On Page 3 moving therapy forward NatioNal CouNCil for HypNotHerapy Address: PO Box 14542, Studley, Warwickshire, B97 9HH Phone / Fax: 0845 544 0788 / 0845 544 0821 Website: www.hypnotherapists.org.uk Email: [email protected] CoNteNts Editorial ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Committee News ............................................................................................................................................2 Letters To The Editor .....................................................................................................................................6 Psycho(a)logical Semiotics and Neurolinguistic Pragmagic ........................................................................8 Tokophobia - The Response from Hypno-Psychotherapy ........................................................................15 The Lighter Side ...........................................................................................................................................18 The Solution Focused Approach to Hypnotherapy ...................................................................................25 Clinical Outcomes Measurement - Burden or Therapeutic tool? .............................................................28 CPD Diary .....................................................................................................................................................30 I am your Supervisor. Friend or Foe? Discuss. .........................................................................................32 Metaphor Corner ..........................................................................................................................................35 Book Reviews ................................................................................................................................................36 tHe NCH Committee Chairman: paul White Tel: 0208 647 9357 email: [email protected] Company secretary: martin armstrong-prior Tel: 0116 276 4911 email: [email protected] executive Director: sophie fletcher Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] marketing Director: paul Howard Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] ethics Director: peter Newell Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] research Director: Donald robertson Tel: 01403 248 266 email: [email protected] technology Director: rob Woodgate Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] Development Director: John Harrington Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] supervision Director: trevor silvester Tel: 01638 720020 email: [email protected] ex-officio roles administrators: Brenda Bentley and annie Dee Hughes Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] training & accreditation: Jill tonks Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] Professional standards: Jo-anne Kelleher Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] Journal editor: rob Woodgate ©iStockphoto.com/geotrac Cover: Tel: 0845 544 0788 email: [email protected] The National Council for Hypnotherapy, established in 1973 under its former title “The Hypnotherapy Register”, represents the practice of Clinical Hypnotherapy as a discrete profession in its own right. Membership is open to those practitioners able to demonstrate appropriate knowledge, evidence of training and clinical experience relevant to the field. The NCH is a member of the UK Confederation of Hypnotherapy Organisations. In other words, the practice of editorial Hypnotherapy doesn’t seem to be the problem... PEOPLE are the problem. If we are seeking regulation as a means of achieving credibility alone, perhaps this is a dangerous game; I’m not surprised there are some mixed feelings about VSR in the profession. For example, some believe that VSR under CNHC will harm our cred- ibility by throwing our lot in with he NCH has a palpable en- say who has the right to practice is professions who have a question- ergy and buzz as our new the ‘easy route’ to ensuring higher able evidence base. There is also the NCH committee members standards of education - If we stop concern that regulation will be the settle in their roles and all the ‘charlatans’ from being able start of a slippery slope that may see Tstart making their mark. to practice, then we’ll achieve higher ‘lay’ hypnotherapy marginalised by standards and more credibility. groups claiming it (or certain condi- Top of the agenda has been the tions) their exclusive domain on the development of training standards The problem is that one mans charla- basis of a perceived ability to harm. and the process of Voluntary Self tan is another mans professional. Regulation (VSR). Even with those reservations in mind, For example, as an NCH member, I believe that the present VSR process As I’ve been reading and reflecting have you ever looked at the ‘trained is broadly a good thing: it is uniting on the committee chatter, I’ve found in a weekend’ schools out there and our once fractured profession under myself asking the question: what’s thought, ‘if only we could regulate an agreed minimum set of standards the intention of that? these people out of business, we’d and common codes of ethics and get more credibility as a profession’? practice, and will hopefully make us Those of you familiar with NLP will strong enough to lobby effectively recognise this as a ‘chunking’ ques- I know I have. After all, it’s human against any later moves to curb our tion (non-NLPers will of course use nature to look for a ‘bad guy’ to freedom to practice. other terminology). vindicate one’s own position. Long term, however, I believe that As I chunked up both aims - ‘Regu- By the same token, however, you can credibility and professional secu- lation’ and ‘Training Standards’ - I bet that there are (perhaps psycho- rity will come more from the focus found myself left with one overrid- logically or medically trained) profes- on externally quantifiable training ing common professional intention sionals thinking the same about us! standards, with Professional Associa- - ‘increasing the credibility of our tions like NCH supporting members profession’. The freedom to practice “lay” hypno- in marketing their practices and the therapy around the world has been profession effectively. (Of course, I was able to chunk higher successfully fought (notably by Gil than that into personal intentions - Boyne and others) for many years Unlike Regulation, the pursuit of for example: more credibility means on the grounds that there has never Training Standards has no down- more clients, means more people been a credible documented case of side risk, and with the current shift helped and more money etc - but actual harm to a client resulting from towards evidence based methodolo- credibility was the highest profes- hypnotherapy alone. gies, can only sional motivation.) serve to make Of course, there are plenty of cases us stronger. Anyway, it occurred to me that these of client abuse (in all its forms), but twin pillars of credibility - ‘Regula- these can happen in any perceived Enjoy the read. tion’ and ‘Training Standards’ - seem authority based relationship (thera- to be heavily entwined. pist/client, doctor/patient, teacher/ Rob Woodgate pupil, adult/child, priest/altar boy Perhaps that’s because the ability to etc). hypnotherapists.org.uk - Issue 2 Vol 10 - The Hypnotherapy Journal 1 you are interested in VSR and in the Committee News future of our profession please do not hesitate to contact me directly as we would like your help and views in moving forward. Many of you will be aware of the name ‘Hypnobirthing’ and its founder Marie Mongon; it has come to our attention that some time ago she made an application to the Intel- lectual Property Office (IPO) in the UK for a Trade Mark for the term This seems an appropriate time to ‘Hypnobirthing’. This process involves View from the Chair mention that Margaret Wiggall our two stages: Stage One involves a Finance Administrator has retired legal appraisal of the application by and has gracefully stepped back the Trade Mark Examination Team The deadline for from the foray of administering a at the IPO. If the application satisfies this issue of the busy and initially complicated posi- the Trade Mark Act then Stage 2 is Journal has been tion. The transition from Margaret to that the application will be published pulled forward a Annie Dee Hughes has been smooth in the Trade Mark’s Journal. After little owing to the and efficient, for which much credit such time, interested parties are able well deserved holi- is due to Margaret’s dedication and to make ‘observations’ on the appli- day of our highly hard work and Annie’s previous work cation. esteemed Editor, experience and quick grasp of our Rob Woodgate, so as I am writing procedures and processes. I am sure We have requested that the IPO, now a good few weeks before the you will all join with me in wishing through their electronic caveat serv- General Election. You will no doubt Margaret a very happy