• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Superradiant Quantum Materials Giacomo Mazza1, 2, ∗ and Antoine Georges2, 3, 1, 4 1CPHT, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, Universit´eParis-Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau, France 2Coll`egede France, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France 3Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, 162 Fifth avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA 4DQMP, Universit´ede Gen`eve,24 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Gen`eve,Suisse There is currently great interest in the strong coupling between the quantized photon field of a cavity and electronic or other degrees of freedom in materials. A major goal is the creation of novel collective states entangling photons with those degrees of freedom. Here we show that the cooperative effect between strong electron correlations in quantum materials and the long-range interactions induced by the photon field leads to the stabilization of coherent phases of light and matter. By studying a two-band model of interacting electrons coupled to a cavity field, we show that a phase characterized by the simultaneous condensation of excitons and photon superradiance can be realized, hence stabilizing and intertwining two collective phenomena which are rather elusive in the absence of this cooperative effect. Introduction. Collective phenomena due to interac- in semiconducting quantum wells are coupled to a cav- tions between light and matter have become in recent ity photon. In their work, electronic interactions were years a major focus of interest spanning different fields not included and, most importantly, the photon diamag- of research. By allowing to create and control entangled netic term, which has been shown to impede superradi- quantum states of light and matter, cavity quantum elec- ance [28, 29, 40], was neglected. trodynamics (QED) offers a fascinating platform in this In this Letter, we demonstrate theoretically in a simple context. This has led to several highly successful research model of interacting electrons coupled to a cavity field directions, in fields as diverse as atomic physics [1{4], how a cooperative effect between light-matter coupling quantum information [5{8] and quantum fluids of polari- and intrinsic electronic interactions can lead to the stabi- tons [9{11]. Advances in controlling and probing light- lization of a coherent light-matter phase, the `superradi- matter interactions have allowed for the investigation of ant excitonic insulator' (SXI), characterized by the simul- collective effects in solid-state systems such as atomically taneous appearance of equilibrium superradiance in the thin or layered materials [12{19]. Recently, pioneering photon field and the condensation of excitons in the elec- work has also explored strong light-matter coupling in tronic system. As summarized in Fig.1, superradiance molecules and molecular solids [20{22]. cannot be reached in the absence of electronic interac- One of the earliest and most important examples of collective phenomena in coupled light-matter systems is superradiance. Originally introduced by Dicke [23] in the description of the collective enhancement of spontaneous emission, superradiance signals a coherence in a ensem- ble of dipoles collectively interacting with the same ra- diation field. At equilibrium superradiance appears as phase transition [24, 25] characterized by the macroscopic population of photons in the ground state and the col- lective ordering of dipoles induced by a photon-mediated effective dipole-dipole interaction. Analogous transitions have been studied in non-equilibrium conditions [26, 27] and in the context of circuit QED [28{32]. In condensed matter physics, a wealth of emergent col- arXiv:1804.08534v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 14 Jan 2019 lective phases has been found in `quantum materials' [33], which result from strong interactions between electrons as well as other degrees of freedom. In this context, the engineering of new forms of effective interactions by means of collective light-matter coupling raises the fasci- FIG. 1. Light-matter phases as a function of the strength of nating possibility of exploring novel emergent collective electronic interactions U and the light-matter coupling g at phenomena involving entangled states of light and mat- a temperature T = 0:15 The red/blue intensity map reflects ter [34{38]. the evolution of the band populations. In the metal region Littlewood and Zhu proposed early on [39] that su- (red) both orbitals are occupied, whereas in the semiconduc- perradiance may occur when electron-hole transitions tor region (blue) the valence band is completely filled. 2 p tions. At the same time coupling to the cavity promotes where g ≡ ∆ !12 is the light-matter coupling with di- 2 excitonic condensation in regimes in which it cannot be mension of an energy and fk ≡ j"1(k) − "2(k)j=!12 is a stabilized by electronic interactions only. Hence, SXI is a dimensionless factor characterizing the momentum dis- phase that intertwines superradiance and excitonic con- persion. We neglect the intra-band couplings as they do densation in conditions where the two phases cannot be not play any role for the phase transition discussed here. individually stabilized. The nature and validity of the approximations made are Light-matter Hamiltonian. We consider spinless elec- summarised in details in the Supplemental Material [41]. trons moving in valence (ν = 1) and conduction (ν = 2) In the limit U = thop = 0 the Hamiltonian (2) re- bands with hopping parameters t2 = −t1 = thop, orig- duces to the well known Dicke-Hopfield model of local- inating from localized atomic orbitals separated by an ized dipoles [23, 42]. Dipole-dipole interactions between energy gap !12. The electrons interact via a local repul- localized dipoles have been considered in [43{45]. For fi- sive interaction U acting when two electrons sit on the nite hopping, but U = 0, the model has been recently same site. The electronic Hamiltonian reads: employed to describe charge transport in cavity-coupled X X X semiconductors [46, 47]. Energies are measured with re- H = " (k)cy c + U n n − µ n (1) el ν kν kν i1 i2 iν spect to !12 = 1 and we fix !12 = !0. kν i iν The Hamiltonian (2) has a global continuous symme- i' iλ y try c ! e ν c and a ! e a with ' −' = λ = ±π. where c =c is the creation/annihilation operator for iν iν 1 2 kν kν We introduce two order parameters: the macroscopic ex- an electron in the Bloch state jkνi with quasi-momentum p pectation value of the photon field α ≡ hai= N signaling k in the band ν and n = cy c is the electron number iν iν iν superradiance [24, 25], and Φ ≡ hcy c i associated with operator on lattice site i. While the results do not depend i1 i2 the condensation of particle-hole pairs (excitons). The qualitatively on this choice, we consider for simplicity a latter opens an hybridization gap, inducing an insulating one-dimensional lattice. The dispersion relations read phase known as an `excitonic insulator' (EI) [48{51]. A " (k) = −" (k) = !12 − 2t cos k and we choose µ = U 2 1 2 hop 2 non-zero value of either α or Φ breaks the above symme- to fix the density to one electron per site hn + n i = 1 i1 i2 try. The coupling of the electronic system (1) to an optical cavity is described by the light-matter Hamiltonian: In the thermodynamic limit for the electronic system, the light matter interaction can be treated exactly as the y y2 saddle point condition of an effective extensive action for H = Hel + !0a a + ∆^ρ a + a + the photon field y 1 X X y + a + a p gνν0 (k)ckν ckν0 (2) N 0 1 X h i k νν Ω α + Γ(k) hcy c i + hcy c i = 0 (5) 0 N k1 k2 α k2 k1 α corresponding to a single-mode of frequency !0 with vec- k tor potential A(r) ≈ pA0 a + ay (dipole approxima- N p 2 q !0 where Ω0 ≡ ! + 4∆!0 and Γ(k) ≡ g12(k) . tion) polarized along the spatial dimension of the elec- 0 Ω0 tronic system. The third term in (2) is the diamagnetic The electronic averages h· · ·iα have to be computed e2 2 q ρ with an effective interacting Hamiltonian Heff = H + contribution with ∆ = A0 and A0 = u, while el el 2m 2!00 P y the last term is the k−dependent dipolar coupling be- 2α k(Γ(k)ck1ck2 +h:c:) which is treated by introducing e 0 a Hartree-Fock (HF) decoupling of the interaction term tween jkνi Bloch states, gνν0 (k) = hkνjpjkν i · A0. m y ∗ y ρ = N=V is the electronic density with V the cavity ni1ni2 ! −m (ni1 − ni2) − Φ ci2ci1 − Φ ci1ci2 + const, volume. 0 is the permittivity of the cavity and u the where m ≡ hni1i − hni2i is the electronic orbital polar- polarization vector. ization. The couplings of the diamagnetic and dipolar terms Absence of superradiance. The critical light-matter are not independent: they are related by the sum rules coupling gc for superradiance is found by solving (5) for resulting from the canonical commutation relations i = g in the limit α ! 0+. In the case of non-interacting [r; p][28, 29]. In the Bloch basis we find that for inter- electrons U = 0 at zero temperature this corresponds to band transitions the following relation holds for each k the solution of 2 4 Γ(k)2 X jgνν0 (k)j X ∆ = : (3) Ω0 − = 0: (6) "ν0 (k) − "ν (k) N j"1(k) − "2(k)j ν6=ν0 k We assume to assign all the oscillators strength to the Using the definition of Ω0 and Γ(k) it is easy to see that transition between the two low-energy bands ν = 1; 2, this condition can never be satisfied for any value of g, obtaining electronic dispersions "ν (k) or !0 > 0.

Load more

  6

Copy Link