• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Topology and geometry under the nonlinear electromagnetic spotlight Qiong Ma,1, 2 Adolfo G. Grushin,3 and Kenneth S. Burch2 1Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2Department of Physics, Boston College 3Institut Neél, CNRS and Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France (Dated: March 8, 2021) ABSTRACT engineering of quantum materials [12–15]. Quantum spin liq- uids, topological semimetals, and superconductors are exam- For many materials, a precise knowledge of their disper- ples of new electronic and magnetic phases that have shifted the sion spectra is insufficient to predict their ordered phases focus from symmetry breaking to quantum geometry. In many and physical responses. Instead, these materials are classi- of these phases nonlocality, superposition and entanglement fied by the geometrical and topological properties of their are fundamental to their properties, and are not revealed by wavefunctions. A key challenge is to identify and imple- classical probes. Uncovering and investigating the underlying ment experiments that probe or control these quantum physics of these emergent phases requires new experimental properties. In this review, we describe recent progress in means and theoretical ideas to explore the quantum geometry this direction, focusing on nonlinear electromagnetic re- and topology of their wavefunctions. The complexity of real sponses that arise directly from quantum geometry and materials poses additional challenges when the desired phases topology. We give an overview of the field by discussing do not emerge or the responses include trivial contributions. new theoretical ideas, groundbreaking experiments, and To overcome material limitations, efforts have shifted to ma- the novel materials that drive them. We conclude by dis- nipulating samples with engineered heterostructures and via cussing how these techniques can be combined with new nonlinear techniques. The latter also has the advantage of po- device architectures to uncover, probe, and ultimately con- tentially controlling the emergent quasiparticles for quantum trol novel quantum phases with emergent topological and computation. correlated properties. In this review we will outline the current theoretical under- standing of nonlinear responses, and their connection to quan- tum geometry and topology. A summary of possible effects I. INTRODUCTION and the ranges at which they emerge can be found in Fig. 2. We also discuss how the realization of these ideas required Nonlinear electromagnetics in quantum materials provides emerging materials and fabrication techniques that produced the means to uncover, probe, and ultimately control new phases an array of new topological phases. After discussing these, of matter (Fig. 1). In general the field has been propelled by we give an overview of recent experimental progress in prob- new materials, theoretical developments and novel experimen- ing the quantum geometry and topology of these materials, tal techniques. For example, the first prediction of a nonlinear ending with a discussion of results in correlated materials and electromagnetic response by M. Goeppert-Mayer in 1929 re- future directions. Though not discussed in detail, we note cau- lied on the simultaneous absorption of two photons whose en- tion should be taken in the interpretation and implementation ergies were half those of the electronic transition involved [1]. of nonlinear responses, as factors other than symmetry and The confirmation of two-photon absorption would take thirty quantum geometry can contribute. The theoretical aspects of years, relying on the invention of the laser with its high power, these effects are discussed in Box 1, while the experimental coherence, and narrow wavelength. complications are summarized in Box 2. In addition, for those Widely tunable lasers and new detectors resulted from op- new to quantum materials we have provided a summary of the timizing nonlinear responses in materials, such as second-, relevant bulk materials in Box 3, and 2D crystals in Box 4. third- and high-harmonic, difference-frequency and nonlinear photocurrent generation [2–4]. These nonlinear electromag- II. OVERVIEW OF NON-LINEAR RESPONSES arXiv:2103.03269v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 4 Mar 2021 netic phenomena now serve to detect broken symmetries, new phases of matter, and the examination of quantum geometry and topology of electron wavefunctions [5–8]. Nearly simul- Nonlinear electrodynamics refers to material response func- taneously, numerous theoretical and experimental efforts have tions that depend on second- or higher-order powers of the focused on using nonlinear approaches to strengthen Cooper electromagnetic field. As these are typically smaller than lin- pairing (via control of phonons and magnons), reshape the ear responses, they require higher intensities. Additionally, as band structure (Floquet engineering), and control fundamen- they involve multiple fields, nonlinear response functions are tal excitations [9–12]. more constrained by crystal symmetries than linear responses. The desire to reveal, understand and tune the wavefunction These constraints are used to expose symmetry breaking and geometry and topology is driven by the recent discovery and geometric properties of the wavefunction that can uncover, 2 probe and control new phases of matter. spatially inhomogeneous beams, discussed in Box 1. Fur- To describe nonlinear responses we consider an incident thermore, we leave for Box 1 extrinsic effects due to elec- light beam, and assume it acts continuously in time (a contin- tronic scattering. With these simplifications, the response of uous wave) with a wavelength λ that we consider to be much a medium that generates a time-dependent photocurrent ji(t) larger than the sample size (2π/λ ≡ jqj ! 0). With these can be expressed in powers of an incident electric field Ei(t) assumptions we exclude complications due to short pulses or as [16] X (1) X (2) X (3) ji(t) = σij Ej(t) + σijkEjEk(t) + σijklEjEkEl(t) + ··· ; (1) j jk jkl The responses proportional to even powers of the electric field much like a magnetic field is invariant under the choice (E2n, n = 1; 2; :::) are only allowed when the lattice structure of different electromagnetic gauges. Its flux over a closed breaks inversion symmetry because E2n is even under inver- momentum surface is a global robust property, a topological sion, while ji is odd. In contrast, terms proportional to odd invariant called the Chern number C. Observables that de- powers of electric fields are always symmetry-allowed. In ad- pend on C are topological. For example, in two-dimensional (i) dition, lattice symmetries constrain which components of σ insulators, the Hall conductivity σH is a linear response n are non-zero, set by the space-group of the material [3, 4]. determined by the integral of Ωk over the Brillouin zone, 2 The goal of this section is to describe to what extent non- and it is quantized to σH = Ce =h. Below we discuss linear responses σ(i>1) are determined by local and global how, under certain approximations, there are also quantized 3 2 properties of the wavefunction. A local property is defined topological nonlinear responses (in units of e =h ) [18], and n the challenges encountered in measuring them [18–21]. by how the wavefunction j k i for a given electronic band n, varies locally as we change its momentum k in the Brillouin zone. In contrast, global properties are defined by comparing Second-order responses: photogalvanic effects and the wavefunction before and after it is transported around a second-harmonic generation closed path, or closed surface, in k space. Global properties The second-order term in Eq. (1), determined by σ(2), is es- do not depend on the path taken, and thus do not depend on pecially significant since it governs responses that are known local details or energetics of the Hamiltonian. This ultimately to be connected to different geometrical properties of the wave- quantizes responses to an integer in units of fundamental con- function. For periodically oscillating fields with frequency ! stants, which is topological because it can only be changed by the two Fourier components ±! can interfere constructively, a global, rather than local, perturbation of the Hamiltonian. generating a response oscillating at 2! known as second- We begin by connecting local properties of the wavefunction harmonic generation (SHG). If they interfere destructively the to the expectation value of electrical currents. Specifically we result is a non-oscillating DC response known as the intrinsic consider the basic quantum mechanical principle by which the photogalvanic effect or the bulk photovoltaic effect (BPVE) position is mapped to derivatives in momentum space. With (Fig. 2a). The attributes intrinsic and bulk remind us that n m this principle, Anm(k) = h k j irk j k i, known as the Berry the direction of the photocurrent is set by crystal symmetry connection, is related to the expectation value of the position and the bandstructure, rather than by extrinsic factors, such operator written in momentum space [16]. The expectation as a preferential direction at the interface in engineered het- value of the position operator determines the charge polariza- erostructures [3, 4], or scattering effects discussed in Box 1. tion, and therefore its time derivatives determine the expecta- The intrinsic photogalvanic effect is explicitly determined tion values of currents. A response that depends on Anm is by geometrical properties of the wavefunction [17, 22, 23]. geometrical

Load more

  19

Copy Link