Wholesale Distribution of Meat and Meat Products, with Special Reference to Omaha, Nebraska, As a Meat Packing Center Dissertati

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wholesale Distribution of Meat and Meat Products, with Special Reference to Omaha, Nebraska, As a Meat Packing Center Dissertati WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION OF MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO OMAHA, NEBRASKA, AS A MEAT PACKING CENTER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U niversity By REX VANCE CALL, B. A., M. B. A. The Ohio State University 1955 Approved by: Adviser Department of Business Organization ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is deeply indebted to his academic adviser, Dr. Theodore N. Beckman, whose assistance and advice has made possible the completion of the research for, and the writing of, this manuscript. Full acknowledgment is also made here for the suggestions and counsel of the other members of the reading committee, Dr. H. H. Maynard and Dr. A. J. Wright, in connec­ tion with the preparation and conclusion of this study. For direct aid in making the research, the author is indebted to William D. Hardy, Elwood G. Derrick, T. W. Wendell, Wayne S. Bartley, all executives of packinghouses, wholesale or retail establishments in Omaha, Nebraska, who furnished much of the data used in this study. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF T A B L E S ...................... ,................ vii LIST CF CHARTS . ...................................... Xi Chapter I. INTRODUCTION * ......................... 1 Purpose of the Study Need for the Study Scope of the Study Objectives of the Study Methods Used in the Study II. THE MEAT INDUSTRY IN THE UNITED STATES * . 6 Centralization and Beginning Large-Scale Industry 10 Decentralization of the Industry ........ 11 Factors Leading to Decentralization .... 15 Increased Use of Motor Trucks; Develop­ ment of Market Information; Standardiza­ tion and Grading; Increased Technology in Refrigeration; Direct Marketing of Live­ stock. Present Location of the Industry.. 22 Relative Position of the Meat Packing Industry Among United States Industries » ........... 27 Production Workers............... 27 Cost of Materials............... 31 Value of Product ..................... 32 Value Added by Manufacture ............. 33 Importance of Meat Packing in Leading States . 34 III. THE MEAT INDUSTRY IN OMAHA, N E B R A S K A .... 36 iii Chapter Page Livestock Market ..................... 36 Establishment and Growth............... 37 Relative Importance of Omaha as a Live­ stock Market........................ .. 40 Quantity as a Basis; Quality as a Basis Packing I n d u s t r y ........................... 46 History and Development............... 46 Present Status of the Industry .......... 49 Omaha's Packing Plants ................. 55 Meat Distribution . ..... 59 IV. CHANNELS OF DISTRIBUTION OF MEAT PRODUCTS IN OMAHA 63 Packer-to-Retailer-to-Consumer Channel .... 63 Territory Served ..... ............. 64 Competitive Aspects ............. 69 Competition on Basis of Price .......... 69 Competition on Basis of Service ..... 72 Packer-to-Wholesaler-to-Institution or Retailer- to-Consumer........................... 75 Share of Wholesale Business 75 Typical Wholesalers . ................. 79 Competitive Aspects ................... 81 Packer-to-Institution-to-Consumer , .......... 82 V. TRANSPORTATION OF MEAT PRODUCTS............... 86 Relative Usage of Rails and Trucks ...... 86 Use of Trucks for Transportating Meat and Meat P r o d u c t s ....................... 95 Advantages of Using Trucks ............. 106 Disadvantages of Using Trucks .......... Ill Use of Rail Transportation for Meat Products . 112 Effects on Wholesaling..................... 117 VI. SPECIAL PROBLEMS ARISING FROM SELF-SERVICE, PRE­ CUTTING AND PACKAGING ' 120 iv Chapter Fage Self-Service .............................. 122 Influence on Buying Habits of Retailers . 129 Quality; Prepackaged Products; Branded Merchandise; Quantities; Time of Purchase and Delivery, Influence on Packers ................. 133 Attitude of Labor Union ............... 138 Precutting and Packaging ................... 139 Retail Level...................... 139 Ivholesale Level ......... 143 Packer Level ........................... 145 Advantages of Precutting and Packag­ ing at Packer Level; Disadvantages of Precutting and Packaging at Facker Level, VII. SPECIAL FROBLSL.fl ARISING PRO'-' FREEZING MEATS . 155 Frozen Food Locker Plants ................. 155 Freezer Food Plans and Home Freezers ..... 160 Freezer Food Plans......... 160 Home F r e e z e r s .................... 162 VIII. SPECIAL PROBLEMS INCIDENT TO GRADING AND INSPECTION 165 Grading ............................ 165 Grading of Beef; Grading of Hogs; Grading in the Packinghouses, Inspection ............ ......... 176 Federal Meat Inspection; Omaha City Inspec­ tion. IX. ORGANIZATION FOR DISTRIBUTION............ lSl Decentralized Sales Organization ........... 1&3 Plant Sales; City Sales; Car Routes; Credit Department; Traffic; Local Delivery; Order Handling; Selection and Training Salesmen; Buying Livestock; Buying Supplies and. Equipment. v Chapter Page Centralized Sales Organization . ............ 193 Product Divisions] Sales Departments. X. SUM&EY AND CONCLUSIONS....................... 200 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................ 230 vi LIST OF TABLES Number of Meat Packing Establishments and Total Value of Product, United States, 1848-1947 ........ 12 Federally Inspected Slaughter: Regional Distribution Hog Slaughter at Principal Markets and. at Other Points in Corn Belt States, Fiscal Years 1920, 1925, 1930, 1940, and 1945 ................................... 14 Rural Roads in United States— Approximate Mileage, 1821 - 1951 ....................................... 17 Total Value of Livestock in United States Per Cent by Divisions ......................................... 24 Rank in Quantity of Specified Items of Livestock Pro­ duction or Sale, by Divisions, 1949^ 1944* 1939 • . 25 Total Livestock Slaughtered in the Corn Belt States, 1948-1952 ......................................... 26 Total Livestock Slaughtered in Selected States, 1948-1953 ......................................... 28 Total Cattle Slaughtered in Selected States, 1942-1953 ......................... .......... 29 Relative Position of the Meat Packing Industry Among United States Industries, 1937-1951 . ...... 30 Importance of Meat Packing Industry to the Economy of Thirteen Leading States According to Number of Employ­ ees, Salaries and Wages, and Value Added by Manufacture 35 Livestock Movements in the West (in carloads), 1880-1882 .................................... 37 Total Receipts and Shipments of Livestock in the Union Stock Yards, Omaha, Nebraska, 1884-1292 ....... 39 Total Receipts of Livestock in, and Ranking of, Lead­ ing Livestock Markets, 1921-1953 • • .............. 41 vii Table Page 14. Total Receipts of Cattle and Calves at Chicago and Omaha Public Markets, 1947-1953 ............... * ♦ • 42 15. Beef Steers Sold for Slaughter at Chicago, Omaha, and Sioux City by Grade, 1952-1953 ............. • 43 16. Disposition of Livestock at Omaha Public Markets and Total United States Slaughter, 1900-1053 ...... 47 17. Relative Importance of Leading Packing’ Centers Accord­ ing to Selected Criteria, 1947 51 18. Livestock Slaughter at Nine Leading Packing Centers, 1950-1953 '................ 52 19. Meat Products Manufacturing by Employment, and Report­ ing Units, Nebraska and Pouglas County, First Quarter,- 1 9 5 1 ......................................... 54 20. Monthly Employment and Total Wages in Meat Products Industry in Nebraska, 1948-1953 . 54 21. Meat Packers Classified According to Selected Criteria, Omaha, Nebraska, 1954 ............................. 68 22. Disposition of Livestock from Stockyards to Local Packers, Omaha, Nebraska, 1951-1953 • 70 23. Number of Packinghouse Salesmen and Method Used in Contacting Customers, Omaha, Nebraska, 1954 ....... 73 24. Merchant Wholesalers of Meat and Meat Products in Selected Metropolitan Areas, 194$ .................. 76 25. Wholesale Establishments in the Meat Industry in Omaha, Nebraska, 1939-1948 78 26. Percentage Change in Receipts of Livestock by Truck and by Rail, All Public Markets and Omaha Public Market, 1930-1953 ................................. 87 27. Truck Receipts as Percentage of Total Receipts of Livestock at Principal Public Markets, 1939-1950 . 89 28. Changes in Percentage of Total Unloads or Receipts by Truck, of Livestock at Principal Markets, 1939-45 Peak to 1950 90 viii Table Page 29. Number of Tons of Animals and Animals Originated by Class I Railways in the United States, 1947-1953 • • 91 30, Drive-in Receipts of Livestock as a Per Cent of Total Receipts at All Principal Markets and at Omaha Market, 1951-1953 92 31» Livestock Received in Omaha Market by State of Origin and Type, 1953 96 32. Livestock Shipped From Omaha Livestock Market by Truck and by Rail, 1950-1953 97 33* Disposition of Livestock From Omaha Livestock Market by Destination and Type, 1953 97 34. Percentage of Meat and Meat Products Transported by Truck and Rail in Normal "Wholesale Area Surrounding Omaha, Nebraska, 1940-1953 . ...................... 102 35. Comparison of Carload and Truckload Rates on Fresh Meat and Packinghouse Products from Omaha, Nebraska, to Selected Shipping Points, 1954 .................. 108 36. Number of Tons of Selected Animal Products Originated by Class I Railroads in the United States and Central Western Region, 1947-1953 ....................... * • 114 37. Meat Markets and Combination Stores (Groceries and Keats) in Nebraska, 1929-1948 122 38. Number Self-Service Meat Stores in United States, • 1948-1952 ......................................... 124
Recommended publications
  • The Origins and Operations of the Kansas City Livestock
    REGULATION IN THE LIVESTOCK TRADE: THE ORIGINS AND OPERATIONS OF THE KANSAS CITY LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE 1886-1921 By 0. JAMES HAZLETT II Bachelor of Arts Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 1969 Master of Arts Oklahoma State University stillwater, Oklahoma 1982 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1987 The.s; .s I q 8111 0 H~3\,.. ccy;, ;i. REGULATION IN THE LIVESTOCK TRADE: THE ORIGINS AND OPERATIONS OF THE KANSAS CITY LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE 1886-1921 Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii 1286885 C Y R0 I GP H T by o. James Hazlett May, 1987 PREFACE This dissertation is a business history of the Kansas City Live Stock Exchange, and a study of regulation in the American West. Historians generally understand the economic growth of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and the business institutions created during that era, within the perspective of "progressive" history. According to that view, Americans shifted from a public policy of laissez faire economics to one of state regulation around the turn of the century. More recently, historians have questioned the nature of regulation in American society, and this study extends that discussion into the livestock industry of the American West. 1 This dissertation relied heavily upon the minutes of the Kansas City Live Stock Exchange. Other sources were also important, especially the minutes of the Chicago Live Stock Exchange, which made possible a comparison of the two exchanges. Critical to understanding the role of the Exchange but unavailable in Kansas City, financial data was 1Morton Keller, "The Pluralist State: American Economic Regulation in Comparative Perspective, 1900-1930," in Thomas K.
    [Show full text]
  • Meat: a Novel
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Faculty Publications 2019 Meat: A Novel Sergey Belyaev Boris Pilnyak Ronald D. LeBlanc University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Belyaev, Sergey; Pilnyak, Boris; and LeBlanc, Ronald D., "Meat: A Novel" (2019). Faculty Publications. 650. https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs/650 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sergey Belyaev and Boris Pilnyak Meat: A Novel Translated by Ronald D. LeBlanc Table of Contents Acknowledgments . III Note on Translation & Transliteration . IV Meat: A Novel: Text and Context . V Meat: A Novel: Part I . 1 Meat: A Novel: Part II . 56 Meat: A Novel: Part III . 98 Memorandum from the Authors . 157 II Acknowledgments I wish to thank the several friends and colleagues who provided me with assistance, advice, and support during the course of my work on this translation project, especially those who helped me to identify some of the exotic culinary items that are mentioned in the opening section of Part I. They include Lynn Visson, Darra Goldstein, Joyce Toomre, and Viktor Konstantinovich Lanchikov. Valuable translation help with tricky grammatical constructions and idiomatic expressions was provided by Dwight and Liya Roesch, both while they were in Moscow serving as interpreters for the State Department and since their return stateside.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Worth Stockyards Historic District 06/29/1976
    Form No 10-300 (Rev 10-741 PH01011133 DATA SHEETc>^^^ ^//^^^ UNITED STATES DEP.XRTMENT OE THE INTERIOR FOR NPS USE ONLY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ftOD 2 9 1975 RECEIVED APR " ' NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTERED J\iH Z 9 ^^^^ SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS QNAME -JI^I^ISTORIC Fort Worth Stockyards Historic District AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET81 NUMBER -NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Fort Worth VICINITY OF 12 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Texas 048 Tarrant 439 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENTUSE ^DISTRICT -PUBLIC ^OCCUPIED ^L^GRICULTURE —MUSEUM X BUILDING(S) •.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE -BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE X ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED -GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC X -BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _N0 MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple ownership STREETS. NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC Tarrant Cotinty Courthouse STREET& NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Fort Worth Texas a REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic Sites Inventory & Recorded Texas Historic Landmark DATE 1975 & 1967 .FEDERAL ^STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS joxas Historlcal Commission CITY. TOWN STATE Austin Texas DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED UNALTERED X_ORIGINALSITE X GOOD —RUINS 5C_ALTERED -MOVED DATE- -FAIR —UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Fort Worth is located in north central Texas near the headwaters of the Trinity River. The famous Chisolm Trail crossed the Trinity River at a point near Fort Worth and the impetus of the cattle drives from south and central Texas through Fort Worth spurred the growth of that early settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel H. Burnham and Chicago's Parks
    Daniel H. Burnham and Chicago’s Parks by Julia S. Bachrach, Chicago Park District Historian In 1909, Daniel H. Burnham (1846 – 1912) and Edward Bennett published the Plan of Chicago, a seminal work that had a major impact, not only on the city of Chicago’s future development, but also to the burgeoning field of urban planning. Today, govern- ment agencies, institutions, universities, non-profit organizations and private firms throughout the region are coming together 100 years later under the auspices of the Burnham Plan Centennial to educate and inspire people throughout the region. Chicago will look to build upon the successes of the Plan and act boldly to shape the future of Chicago and the surrounding areas. Begin- ning in the late 1870s, Burnham began making important contri- butions to Chicago’s parks, and much of his park work served as the genesis of the Plan of Chicago. The following essay provides Daniel Hudson Burnham from a painting a detailed overview of this fascinating topic. by Zorn , 1899, (CM). Early Years Born in Henderson, New York in 1846, Daniel Hudson Burnham moved to Chi- cago with his parents and six siblings in the 1850s. His father, Edwin Burnham, found success in the wholesale drug busi- ness and was appointed presidet of the Chicago Mercantile Association in 1865. After Burnham attended public schools in Chicago, his parents sent him to a college preparatory school in New England. He failed to be accepted by either Harvard or Yale universities, however; and returned Plan for Lake Shore from Chicago Ave. on the north to Jackson Park on the South , 1909, (POC).
    [Show full text]
  • Meat Packing, an Industry on the Deck
    University of Mississippi eGrove Touche Ross Publications Deloitte Collection 1964 Meat Packing, an industry on the deck Maurice McGill Iowa Beef Packers Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/dl_tr Part of the Accounting Commons, and the Taxation Commons Recommended Citation Quarterly, Vol. 10, no. 3 (1964, September), p. 17-21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Deloitte Collection at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touche Ross Publications by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. by Maurice McGill MEAT PACKIN6 The author wishes to express his appreciation to Iowa Beef Packers, Inc., for their cooperation in preparing this article. An Industry nn the Deck "Gentlemen, this industry is on the deck. It has hit the cheaper to transport the cattle to feed supplies, primarily bottom and has only one way to go — up." This statement corn, than it was to transport feed to the cattle, particu­ was made recently to a group of financial analysts by larly in view of the fact that in doing so, the cattle were A. D. Anderson, president of Iowa Beef Packers, Inc., as moved closer to the larger Eastern population centers he discussed one of the largest, most important industries where they would ultimately be consumed. Inadequate of the United States — meat packing. These comments, refrigeration and transportation facilities made it impera­ coming from the president of the newest member in the tive that meat slaughter plants be located close to the family of major meat packers, were greeted with some consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    i n <V NFS Form 10-900 OMB NO. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name N/A other names/site number South Omaha Main Street Historic District 2. Location street & number 4723-5002 So. 24th Street N ffi^ not for publication city, town Omaha N /A! vicinity state Nebraska code NE county Douglas code Q55 zip code 68107 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property X private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local fxl district buildings public-State EH site _ sites public-Federal I I structure _0_ structures I I object _0_ objects 36 _9_Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register 1 ___ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this [x] nomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Meat Packing Industry in South Omaha, 1883-1898
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 8-1-1989 Building the meat packing industry in South Omaha, 1883-1898 Gail Lorna DiDonato University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation DiDonato, Gail Lorna, "Building the meat packing industry in South Omaha, 1883-1898" (1989). Student Work. 1154. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/1154 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUILDING THE MEAT PACKING INDUSTRY IN SOUTH OMAHA, 1883-1898 A Thesis Presented to the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA by Gail Lorna DiDonato August, 1989 UMI Number: EP73394 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertaffan PWWfeMng UMI EP73394 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 THESIS ACCEPTANCE Acceptance for the faculty of the Graduate College, University of Nebraska, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition in the Fats and Oils Industry
    December 1958 Transition in the Tats and Oils Industry District Processors Seek Efficiency Problems that haunt an industry with excess capacity are plants processing animal fats is meat and not animal fats, exemplified by the fats and oils industry in the Sixth Fed­ however, those plants do not face the same problems con­ eral Reserve District. During the Second World War the fronting the vegetable oil industry. Sixth District states, for Government encouraged farmers to increase their soy­ example, have increased their edible animal fats and oil bean, cottonseed, and peanut production to relieve a production about one-fourth since 1950. During that critical war-born shortage of fats and oils. Processors time, there has been little change in total vegetable oil and manufacturers in the industry found it profitable to production. buy more and better equipment to handle the larger sup­ The District’s vegetable oil industry is made up of three plies. Researchers worked unceasingly to find substitutes segments—crushing, refining, and manufacturing. Crush­ for those oils in critical demand. Their efforts were suc­ ers, who extract crude oil from oil seeds, perform a dual cessful and many states over the nation found new oil operation in that they produce two products from the seeds crops—the bread of life for this growing industry. —oil and meal. Sold principally as a high protein feed Phenomenal growth records were made in vegetable for animals, meal is a finished product ready for sale on oil production. Nationally, we shifted from one of the the retail market. The oil, however, is in crude form, and world’s largest importers of fats and oils before the war needs further processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Beef Packers' Use of Alternative Marketing Arrangements
    Investigation of Beef Packers’ Use of Alternative Marketing Arrangements United States Department of Agriculture Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration Packers and Stockyards Program Western Regional Office 3950 Lewiston St., Suite 200 Aurora, CO 80011-1556 July 2014 Investigation of Beef Packers’ Use of Alternative Marketing Arrangements Executive Summary The USDA’s Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) conducted an investigation in response to complaints by participants in the cattle industry that the top four beef packers used committed supplies1 in ways that were anticompetitive. Their concern was that by using committed supplies and formula pricing, (referred to in this report as “alternative marketing arrangements” or AMAs) the cash market was less competitive resulting in lower fed cattle prices. Investigators from GIPSA’s Western Regional Office Business Practices Unit of the Packers and Stockyards Program (P&SP) conducted the investigation. This report details the methods and findings of the investigation, the purpose of which was to determine if the use of AMAs violates the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 (Act). P&SP investigators conducted numerous interviews and collected written statements from cattle producers, sellers, feeders, industry organizations, and the packers. The investigation examined confidential transaction data from USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), and confidential transaction data from the four largest beef packers and various cattle sellers. The report documents the structure of fed cattle markets and confirms that, in general, the markets are highly concentrated, especially at the regional level and with regard to negotiated cash sales. Negotiated cash market purchases made up about 39 percent of total fed cattle purchases in the United States in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the U.S. Meat Industry Elizabeth Boyle, Ph.D. and Rodolfo
    Development of the U.S. Meat Industry Elizabeth Boyle, Ph.D. and Rodolfo Estrada Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University November 1994 The U.S. meat industry began during colonial times. Initially, colonists depended on wild animals for their meat supply. As the supply of domestic livestock increased, colonists became involved in trading meat with the West Indies in exchange for molasses. Meat was salted, smoked and packed into wooden barrels or boxes for storage and shipping. Hence, the term "meat packing." According to historical records, William Pynchon of Springfield, Massachusetts became the first American devoted to the 'packing' business. In 1655 he started by driving cattle to Boston, and was packing large numbers of hogs by 1662. The first retail meat shops were operated by colonial butchers. Having learned their trade in Europe, local butchers supplied meat to others in the community beyond their own immediate family. With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, eastern cities grew and the demand for meat increased. To serve this market, large cattle ranches were established west of the Mississippi river. Between 1865 and 1875, railroads expanded into the Mississippi and Ohio Valley regions. Range cattle were driven on hoof over cattle trails from production areas in the west to railheads. One of the best known trails was the Chisholm Trail which led from Texas to Abilene, Kansas. Railroad cattle cars were then used to transport livestock to large eastern packing houses. Cincinnati, Buffalo, Milwaukee and Chicago became centers of the packing industry. Meat packing was a seasonal industry, operating primarily during the cooler months.
    [Show full text]
  • South 24Th Street Walking Tour
    SOUTH 24TH STREET WALKING TOUR 14. 4736 S. 24th St. U.S. Post Office Impressed by the rapid growth of South Omaha, the U.S. Government made plans for a new post office building in 1897. Constructed in 1899 of buff brick with terra cotta wall trim, the Classical Revival front features giant columns with Roman Corinthian capitals. The interior repeats the columns in wood and also features high lead glass windows. The building housed U.S. Dept. of Agriculture inspectors in the early days; later it served as an armed forces recruiting center. 15. 4701 S. 25th St. El Museo Latino El Museo Latino opened its doors in the historic Livestock Exchange Building in 1993 and moved to its current location in 1997. Patrons can view world-class permanent and traveling exhibitions featuring local, national and international Latino art and culture. Bilingual educational programs are offered year round. The building was constructed in 1887 as South Central Other nearby buildings, Restoration Exchange Omaha Public School. The Polish Home adapted the building into its organizations, landmarks of note: 3902 Davenport Street headquarters in 1937, and, for more than a half-century it was the Omaha, Nebraska 68131 hub of Polish-related activities, including hundreds of wedding 2324 J. St. St. Martin of Tours Church 402.679.5854 receptions and funeral luncheons. Built in 1899 of reclaimed stone from the burned Ralston estate [email protected] of Omaha Daily Herald publisher George Miller, the church is a www.restorationexchange.org prime example of Late Gothic Revival style and is on the National www.south24thomahatour.com Register of Historic Places.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospitality Soap Wrappers Collection 2015.290
    Hospitality soap wrappers collection 2015.290 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Audiovisual Collections PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Hospitality soap wrappers collection 2015.290 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Inventory ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 By state .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]