Curriculum Standards 2.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Curriculum Standards 2.Indd APPENDIX A Educating to Truth, Beauty, and Goodness20 The world, in all its diversity, is eager to be guided towards the great values of mankind, truth, good and beauty; now more than ever…Teaching means to accompany young people in their search for truth and beauty, for what is right and good. Educating Today and Tomorrow: A Renewing Passion, 201421 We want our students to maximize their human potential and to both be good and do good in authentic freedom. In order to do this, our students need to be able to know how to wisely and fully apprehend and interrogate all aspects of reality from a solid Christian intellectual tradition. This intellectual tradition involves not just teaching facts and skills, but is also essentially focused on seeking to know the value and nature of things and in appreciating the value of knowledge for its own sake. One method of assisting students to keep focus on these aspects of Catholic intellectual inquiry is to use the lenses of truth, goodness, and beauty to evaluate a subject under consideration. These three elements are often understood as being among the transcendentals. Transcendentals are the timeless and universal attributes of being.22 They are the properties of all beings. They reflect the divine origin of all things and the unity of all truth and reality in God. These elements are among the deepest realities. They help unite men across time and culture and are often a delight to explore and discuss, because they are substantive to our very nature. The transcendentals of truth, beauty, and goodness are closely intertwined. Dubay (1999) observed that, “Truth, goodness, and beauty have their being together. By truth we are put in touch with reality, which we find is good for us and beautiful to behold. In our knowing, loving, and delighting the gift of reality appears to us as ‘something infinitely and inexhaustibly valuable and fascinating.’”23 In seeking to discuss one, the others are naturally and organically brought into the conversation. The following simple definitions and essential questions are provided as a general framework to help facilitate a discussion on any topic in any subject. The goal is not to generate easy questions for easy answers, but to generate foundational questions for deep inquiry into the value and nature of things, to instill a sense of the intrinsic value of knowledge, and to elicit a sense of wonder. Beauty Beauty can help evoke wonder and delight, which are foundations of a life of wisdom and inquiry.24 Beauty involves apprehending unity, harmony, proportion, wholeness, and radiance.25 It often manifests itself in simplicity and purity, especially in math and science.26 Often beauty 25 The Cardinal Newman Society has a type of pre-rational (striking) force upon the soul, for instance when one witnesses a spectacular sunset or the face of one’s beloved. Beauty can be understood as a type of inner radiance or shine coming from a thing that is well-ordered to its state of being or is true to its nature or form.27 Beauty pleases not only the eye or ear, but also the intellect in a celebration of the integrity of our body and soul. It can be seen as a sign of God’s goodness, benevolence and graciousness, of both His presence and His transcendence in the world.28 It can serve as re-enchantment with the cosmos and all reality29 and assist in moving our students to a rich and deep contemplative beholding of the real.30 Some essential questions related to beauty: ♦ Is “X” beautiful? How so? Why not? ♦ Which of these (i.e., poems, experiments, proofs, theories, people, functions, concepts) is more beautiful and why? Why might others have thought this beautiful? ♦ How does this person/thing attract? Is this person using their God-given gifts to attract in a way that pleases God and draws others closer to God? What can happen when beauty is not used for the glory of God? ♦ What is delightful, wondrous about this person/thing? ♦ How does this shine? Radiate? ♦ How is faithfulness to form or nature powerfully evident here? ♦ What does this reveal about the nature of what is seen? ♦ Where is there unity and wholeness here? ♦ Where is there proportion and harmony here? ♦ How does this reveal God’s graciousness, presence, and transcendence? ♦ What does my response to this reveal about me? ♦ Is this also Good? Is this also True? Goodness When we explore issues of goodness with our students, we are fundamentally asking them to consider questions of how well someone or something fulfills its purpose. Goodness is understood as the perfection of being. A thing is good to the degree that it enacts and perfects those powers, activities, and capacities appropriate to its nature and purpose. A good pair of scissors cuts, a good eye has 20/20 vision, and so forth. We have to know a thing’s purpose, nature, or form to engage in an authentic discussion of “The Good.” When we get to questions 26 Catholic Curriculum Standards of what is a good law, a good government, a good father, or a good man, the discussion quickly grows richer, deeper, and more complex. As Catholic educators, our goal is to help our students to become good persons. Among those qualities we deem good are wisdom, faithfulness, and virtue. Virtue is a habitual and firm disposition to do the good.31 We are free to the extent that with the help of others, we have maximized these goods, these proper powers and perfections as man.32 Such efforts raise fundamental questions of what it means to be human and our relationships with each other, the created world, and God. God, through reason and revelation, has not left us blind on these issues, nor has He left us up to our own subjective devices. It is a fundamental responsibility of the Catholic school to teach and pass on this Catholic culture, this Catholic worldview, this cultural patrimony, these insights, and these very fundamental truths about the good and what constitutes the good life.33 Particularly, in this and all our efforts as Catholic educators, we build our foundation of the good on Jesus Christ, who is the perfect man, and who fully reveals man to himself.34 Some essential questions related to goodness: ♦ What is this thing’s purpose/end? What do we know from our senses and reason? From nature and natural law? What do we know from revelation? ♦ What is this thing’s nature? What do we know from our senses and reason? From nature and natural law? What do we know from revelation? ♦ What perfections are proper to this thing in light of its purpose? ♦ To what degree does the particular instance we are considering possess or lack these perfections? ♦ What, if anything, would make this better? ♦ What would make this worse? ♦ How well does this work? Is “X” a good “Y”? What makes “X” a good “Y”? (e.g., Is Odysseus a good husband? Is the liver we are diagnosing a good liver? Is the theory of relativity a good theory? Is Picasso a good artist?) ♦ How does this measure up in terms of a Catholic worldview and values? ♦ How does this measure up in terms of Catholic morality and virtue? ♦ How does this measure up to God’s plan or expectations of it as revealed in Christ? ♦ Is this also beautiful? Is this also true? Truth A simple definition for truth is the mind being in accord with reality.35 We seek always to place our students and ourselves in proper relationship with the truth. Nothing we do can ever be opposed to the truth, that is, opposed to reality which has its being in God. Catholics hold that 27 The Cardinal Newman Society when our senses are in good condition and functioning properly under normal circumstances, and when our reason is functioning honestly and clearly, we can come to know reality and have the ability to make true judgments about reality. Through study, reflection, experimentation, argument and discussion, we believe that an object under discussion may manifest itself in its various relations, either directly or indirectly, to the mind.36 We believe that Man tends by nature toward the truth. Even though due to our fallen nature we may sometimes seek to ignore or obfuscate the truth, we are nonetheless obliged to honor and bear witness to it in its fullness. We are bound to adhere to the truth once we come to know it and direct our whole life in accordance with the demands of truth.37 As Catholics, we believe that reason, revelation, and science will never be in ultimate conflict, as the same God created them all.38 We oppose scientism which without evidence makes the metaphysical claim that only what can be measured and subject to physical science can be true. We oppose relativism, not only because its central dictum “there is no truth” is self-contradicting, but also because in removing objective truths from any analysis, this also removes the possibility of gauging human progress, destroys the basis for human dignity, and disables the ability to make important moral distinctions such as the desirability of tolerance 39 and wisdom of pursuing truth, beauty, and goodness as opposed to their opposites of error, ugliness, and sin. Some essential questions related to truth: ♦ Is it true? ♦ Is our mind/concept in accord with reality? ♦ Are we looking at this clearly and with our senses and reason properly attuned? ♦ Is the thinking rational and logical? ♦ Is the information and reasoning clear and precise? ♦ Is the approach fair and balanced? ♦ How does this square with what we know from revelation? If there is a disconnect, where further shall we explore? ♦ On what intellectual, moral, or intuitive principle are we basing this? ♦ Can the knowledge or situation under consideration be integrated with or expanded by the knowledge from another academic discipline? ♦ Now that we know this particular truth about a thing, what other questions does that raise? What more do we want to know? ♦ Is this also beautiful? Is this also good? 28 APPENDIX B Assessing Non-Cognitive Standards In the Catholic school’s educational project there is no separation between time for learning and time for formation, between acquiring notions and growing in wisdom.
Recommended publications
  • The Importance of the Catholic School Ethos Or Four Men in a Bateau
    THE AMERICAN COVENANT, CATHOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY AND EDUCATING FOR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL ETHOS OR FOUR MEN IN A BATEAU A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ruth Joy August 2018 A dissertation written by Ruth Joy B.S., Kent State University, 1969 M.S., Kent State University, 2001 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Natasha Levinson _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Averil McClelland _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Catherine E. Hackney Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Foundations, Leadership and Kimberly S. Schimmel Administration ........................ _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human Services James C. Hannon ii JOY, RUTH, Ph.D., August 2018 Cultural Foundations ........................ of Education THE AMERICAN COVENANT, CATHOLIC ANTHROPOLOGY AND EDUCATING FOR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL ETHOS. OR, FOUR MEN IN A BATEAU (213 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Natasha Levinson, Ph. D. Dozens of academic studies over the course of the past four or five decades have shown empirically that Catholic schools, according to a wide array of standards and measures, are the best schools at producing good American citizens. This dissertation proposes that this is so is partly because the schools are infused with the Catholic ethos (also called the Catholic Imagination or the Analogical Imagination) and its approach to the world in general. A large part of this ethos is based upon Catholic Anthropology, the Church’s teaching about the nature of the human person and his or her relationship to other people, to Society, to the State, and to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic University As Witness” with Guest, Patrick Reilly
    The “Crisis of Truth” (and the Renewal) in American Catholic Education By Patrick J. Reilly, Papal Visit 2015 Commemorative Issue Patrick J. Reilly is president of The Cardinal Newman Jesuits. Their embrace of secular values and disdain for Society, which promotes and defends faithful Catholic Catholic orthodoxy have contributed substantially to education. the corruption of American society, including Catholic laity. The last time a Pontiff visited America, he urged Cath- olic school and college educators to confront the “con- And our treasured parochial school system is in decline. temporary crisis of truth” that is “rooted in a crisis of In the last 50 years, the number of Catholics in the faith.” United States in- creased nearly two- Speaking at The Catho- thirds to 80 million, but lic University of Amer- the number of students ica in Washington, in Catholic schools de- D.C., Pope Benedict in- clined by more than 60 vited a renewal of fidel- percent. Enrollment in ity, rededication to truth urban areas has de- and recommitment to clined by nearly a third the moral and religious in just the last decade. formation of students — and he rejected In San Francisco, Pope Americans’ radical ver- Francis can find evi- sion of “academic free- dence of another sort dom” which disregards of decline. More than truth and the common Students from Christendom College in Front Royal, Virginia, carry the March 80 percent of the Arch- good. for Life banner in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington January 22, diocese’s high school 2009. It was the 36th annual March for Life.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened to Notre Dame?
    What Happened to Notre Dame? Charles E. Rice Introduction by Alfred J. Freddoso ST. AUGUSTINE’S PRESS South Bend, Indiana 2009 Copyright © 2009 by Charles E. Rice Introduction copyright © 2009 by Alfred J. Freddoso All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of St. Augustine’s Press. Manufactured in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Rice, Charles E. What happened to Notre Dame? / Charles E. Rice ; introduction by Alfred J. Freddoso. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN-13: 978-1-58731-920-4 (paperbound : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-58731-920-9 (paperbound : alk. paper) 1. University of Notre Dame. 2. Catholic universities and colleges – United States. 3. Catholics – Religious identity. 4. Academic freedom. 5. University autonomy. 6. Obama, Barack. I. Title. LD4113.R54 2009 378.772'89 – dc22 2009029754 ∞ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences - Permanence of Paper for Printed Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. St. Augustine’s Press www.staugustine.net Table of Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction by Alfred J. Freddoso xi 1. Invitation and Reaction 1 2. The Justification: Abortion as Just Another Issue 9 3. The Justification: The Bishops’ Non-Mandate 18 4. The Obama Commencement 25 5. ND Response 34 6. Land O’Lakes 42 7. Autonomy at Notre Dame: “A Small Purdue with a Golden Dome”? 54 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Nos. 12-5273, 12-5291 in the UNITED STATES COURT OF
    USCA Case #12-5273 Document #1403338 Filed: 11/05/2012 Page 1 of 32 [ORAL ARUMENT SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 14, 2012] Nos. 12-5273, 12-5291 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT WHEATON COLLEGE and BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendants-Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIEF FOR APPELLEES STUART F. DELERY Acting Assistant Attorney General RONALD C. MACHEN, JR. United States Attorney MARK B. STERN ALISA B. KLEIN ADAM C. JED (202) 514-8280 Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7240 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 USCA Case #12-5273 Document #1403338 Filed: 11/05/2012 Page 2 of 32 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES A. Parties and Amici The plaintiffs-appellants in these consolidated appeals are Belmont Abbey College and Wheaton College. The defendants-appellees are Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services; the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Hilda Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; the United States Department of Labor; Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; and the United States Department of the Treasury.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholicism on Campus: Stability and Change in Catholic Student Faith By
    Number 9 Catholicism on Campus: Stability and change in Catholic student faith by college type Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University Putting social science research at the service of the Church since 1964. CARA is a national, non-profit, Georgetown University affiliated research center that conducts social scientific studies about Catholicism and the Catholic Church. Founded in 1964, CARA has been affiliated with Georgetown University since 1989. CARA has three major dimensions to its mission: to increase the Church's self understanding; to serve the applied research needs of Church decision-makers; and to advance scholarly research on religion, particularly Catholicism. CARA’s longstanding policy is to let research findings stand on their own and never take an advocacy position or go into areas outside its social science competence. All CARA researchers have graduate degrees in relevant social science disciplines. CARA researchers are Georgetown faculty members and are active in the academic community publishing in peer-reviewed journals and presenting research about the Catholic Church at professional academic conferences. The CARA Inspiration: In pastoral care, sufficient use must be made not only of theological principles, but also the findings of the secular sciences, especially of psychology and sociology, so that the faithful may be brought to a more accurate and mature life of faith. —The Second Vatican Council Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World (Gaudium et Spes) Mary E. Bendyna,
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Organizations Eligible for Voluntary Contributions from Tax Refunds As of 11:59 PM, Aug
    Charitable Organizations Eligible for Voluntary Contributions from Tax Refunds as of 11:59 PM, Aug. 29,2019. Colorado charities organized by county. Adams County Principal Name of Organization Registration Number 50 IN 52 JOURNEY, INC. 20093008514 A CHILD'S SONG, INC. 20043009591 A CHILD'S TOUCH 20083006424 A WORLD AWARE, INC. D.B.A. AWA 20083005830 ABATE OF COLORADO 20103002255 ACCESS HOUSING OF ADAMS COUNTY, INC. 20043010015 ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR EDUCATION FOUNDATION 20093011502 ADAMS 14 EDUCATION FOUNDATION 20023002971 ADAMS COUNTY EDUCATION CONSORTIUM 20103003023 ADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK 20143000091 ADAMS COUNTY FOUNDATION, INC. 20083005695 ADAMS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY 20103024876 ADAMS COUNTY JR LIVESTOCK SALE COMMITTEE 20083007087 ADAMS COUNTY YOUTH INITIATIVE, INC. 20143029109 ALMOST HOME, INC. 20053007451 ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUTH, INC. 20023003394 AMERICAN LEGION POST 22 20043006901 AMI OF ADAMS COUNTY INC 20093008255 ARISING HOPE 20113030317 ASCEND PERFORMING ARTS, INC. 20023005880 ASIAN PACIFIC CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 20123008365 ATL FOUNDATION 20093008419 AURORA COMMUNITY CONNECTION FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER 20103032479 AURORA INTERCHURCH TASK FORCE, INC. 20033001983 AURORA WARMS THE NIGHT, INC. 20133004783 BENNETT ELEMENTARY PTSA 20113029174 BETHEL FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL 20093008143 BOLTZ WRESTLING CLUB 20123015119 BRAZIL OUTREACH MINISTRIES UNLIMITED 20083004274 BREAD OF LIFE AFRICAN MINISTRIES 20093007103 BRIDGES OF SILENCE 20033002733 BRIGHTON BULLFROGS SWIM TEAM INC. 20083005395 BRIGHTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle- Who Is Catholic
    Who Is Catholic? New conservative colleges say existing institutions lead students away from the true faith By BURTON BOLLAG Naples, Fla. Colloquy Live: Read the transcript of a live, online discussion with David O'Brien, a historian of American Catholicism at the College of the Holy Cross, aBout the staunchly conservative Roman Catholic colleges that have Been recently estaBlished in the United States. Every evening at 9 o'clock a group of students and faculty members gathers between two four‐story student residences ‐‐ one for men, the other for women ‐‐ and sets off on a "rosary walk" around the former assisted‐living complex that serves as Ave Maria University's temporary campus, proclaiming the 20 mysteries of the life of Jesus Christ. At Ave Maria, Mass is celebrated three times a day, Latin is a required subject, and divorced Catholics are not welcome as faculty members. Opened last fall and currently enrolling 122 students, it is the best financed and the most ambitious of about a dozen new or planned Roman Catholic institutions of a very conservative bent. After a quarter century in which no new Catholic colleges were established, most of those being founded now are led by traditionalists who feel the majority of America's 230 Catholic colleges have strayed from the truth of the Catholic faith. The Rev. Joseph D. Fessio, a Jesuit and Ave Maria's chancellor, shares that view. He is bitterly critical of the University of San Francisco, the Jesuit institution where he taught for almost two decades, for such decisions as hiring a gay former priest as head of marriage‐and‐family counseling, and allowing students to stage the play The Vagina Monologues.
    [Show full text]
  • VISITATION POLICIES at U.S. CATHOLIC COLLEGES by Adam Wilson February 2016
    VISITATION POLICIES AT U.S. CATHOLIC COLLEGES by Adam Wilson February 2016 Summary This study of campus policies at Catholic colleges in the United States finds that the vast majority permit students of the opposite sex to visit campus bedrooms behind closed doors until late at night—and on many campuses, visitation is allowed without any hour limitation. When compared to a selection of devout Protestant and nondenominational Christian colleges, a similar selection of Catholic colleges has more relaxed policies pertaining to opposite-sex visitation in student bedrooms. About the Author Adam Wilson is Managing Editor of The Newman Guide to Choosing a Catholic College and Director of Communications at The Cardinal Newman Society. All of The Cardinal Newman Society’s research and analysis, including this paper, is available online on the Society’s website at www.CardinalNewmanSociety.org. Copyright © 2016 The Cardinal Newman Society. Permission to reprint is hereby granted provided no modifications are made to the text and it is identified as a publication of The Cardinal Newman Society. Note: The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Cardinal Newman Society. The Cardinal Newman Society 9720 Capital Court Suite 201 Manassas, Virginia 20110 703/367-0333 [email protected] The Cardinal Newman Society Visitation Policies at U.S. Catholic Colleges Visitation Policies at U.S. Catholic Colleges by Adam Wilson Introduction his report presents the results from a Cardinal Newman Society study of the visitation T policies in student residences at residential Catholic colleges, not including seminaries, in the United States.1 Data used in the report was collected during the summer of 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cardinal Newman Society
    OPPOSITION NOTES AN INVESTIGATIVE SERIES ON THOSE WHO OPPOSE WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH TABLE OF CONTENTS The Cardinal Newman Introduction . 1. Key Findings . 2 Origins . .2 . .Society Notre Dame: A Controversy . 2 without Consensus “ The most unhappily and inappropriately named society Issues . 3 on the planet” Finances . 6 Catholic Higher Education . .7 . in the United States INTRODUCTION Catholic Identity on Campus: . 8. In Decline? Holding on to Religious . .8 . he Cardinal Newman Society (CNS) claims that its mission is “to help renew and Exemptions strengthen Catholic identity in Catholic higher education,” but there are many Ex corde Ecclesiae . 9. Tclergy, staff at Catholic universities, students and laypeople who don’t recognize Tactics: Tricks of Perspective . 10 themselves in the organization’s vision of Catholic identity. Some, like the National Catholic Criticism . 13 Reporter, have pointed out the striking contrast between Cardinal Newman the man and Conclusion . .17 . the society that bears his name: “the most unhappily and inappropriately named society on the planet.”1 The Cardinal Newman Society devotes its energy to pointing out supposed breaches of dogma within Catholic universities, engineering negative publicity primarily by instigating letter-writing campaigns and posting online petitions. America magazine criticized the society’s “watchdog tactics” for employing a negative rather than positive definition of Catholicism — that is, it aims to prune away The Cardinal Newman Society is “destructive and perceived deviations from orthodoxy, rather than cultivating a Catholicism that is something antithetical to a spirit of unity in our commitment to more than mere conformism.2 serve society and the church.” Catholic academia has not always welcomed guidance from the CNS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bishop 21
    How to Keep Your University Catholic Rev. Leonard A. Kennedy, C.S.B., Ph.D. With a New Preface by Rev. Msgr. Stuart W. Swetland, S.T.D. Revised Third Edition The Cardinal Newman Society Manassas, Virginia All Rights Reserved. Permission to reprint is hereby granted provided no modifications are made to the text and it is identified as a product of The Center for the Study of Catholic Higher Education, The Cardinal Newman Society or both. Note: The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Center for the Study of Catholic Higher Education or The Cardinal Newman Society. First edition printed in 1992 by Life Ethics Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Second edition printed in 1997 by Christendom Press, Front Royal, Virginia. Third edition printed in 2009 by The Center for the Study of Catholic Higher Education, Manassas, Virginia. ISBN: 978-0-615299815 © Copyright Leonard Kennedy All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. This publication is also available online at CatholicHigherEd.org. Published by: The Cardinal Newman Society President, Patrick J, Reilly Executive Vice President, Thomas W. Mead The Center for the Study of Catholic Higher Education Director, Joseph A. Esposito Deputy Director, Evangeline C. Jones Layout by David J. Costanzo Director of Communications Cover Photo Courtesy of Aquinas College, Nashville, TN To Father Michael Scanlan, T.O.R. President Emeritus, Franciscan University of Steubenville: Who has shown that it can be done. Table of Contents Foreword 1 “Stewards of a Heritage, Bearers of Hope” by Rev. Msgr. Stuart Swetland, S.T.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Educator
    The Catholic Educator Quarterly Journal of the Catholic Education Foundation Volume 25 – Summer 2019 A Word From Our Editor Christus Vivit The post-synodal apostolic exhortation on youth, Christus Vivit (hereafter, CV), has arrived. The first, and most important, point to make is that the worst predictions of some of the prophets of doom have not been realized: there is no heresy in the document; in fact, there is very little theology in the document (about which more momentarily). What is good is very good; the rest, for the most part, is banal. Years ago, a very wise cardinal told me that if you wanted to get a quick overview of a work, check the footnotes. CV has 164 footnotes. According to my calculation, 56 of them are citations from the Final Document (FD) of the synod on youth; 61 of the footnotes are from Pope Francis himself. Now, all popes have been self-referential in their writing, but this is a bit much: over 40% of the material from the current author? The Fathers of the Church are cited five times, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church comes in for two. Pope Benedict makes it twice, just like his predecessor, Pope John Paul II. Imagine: JP2 – the Pope of Youth – is quoted only twice! In this overview, I would like to proceed by way of chiaroscuro – reflection on both lights and shadows. The Lights So, let’s start our considerations with what is good. Unlike the FD, CV begins from a clearly sacral perspective, with the very first words: “Christ is alive!” Chapter One offers a very healthy menu of young holy men and women whom we encounter in the Sacred Scriptures: in the Old Testament – Joseph, Gideon, Samuel, David, Solomon, Jeremiah, Ruth; in the New Testament – the prodigal son (in his repentance), the rich young man (for having kept all the commandments, even if he couldn’t take the next step), the wise virgins of the parable.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Catholic Colleges Leading Students Astray?
    SPECIAL REPORT Are Catholic Colleges Leading Students Astray? A nationwide survey raises concerns about the impact that American colleges have on the faith and morals of Catholic students. By PATRICK J. REILLY ven while many Catholic col- leges in the United States are making exciting progress in their efforts to renew Catholic (NANCY WIECHEC/CNS) Ehigher education, the challenges faced by reformers just keep growing worse. Dozens of Catholic colleges recently hosted productions of “Vagina Mono- logues,” a vulgar play in which the les- bian seduction of a 16-year-old girl is portrayed as her “salvation.” [See side- bar.] A women’s center at Saint Mary’s College in Notre Dame, Indiana, funded four students’ travel to a pro-abortion leadership conference in Washington, DC—at a time when thousands of pro- life college students were finding their own way to the same city for the annual March for Life. And now comes hard I Students cross the campus of Catholic University of America in Washington, DC. data that confirms the failure of many Catholic colleges to tend to their stu- ganization of which I am president, ded- HERI compared the 38 participating dents’ spiritual needs. icated to restoring Catholic identity in Catholic colleges (including 20 four- A survey of students at 38 Catholic America’s Catholic colleges—commis- year colleges and 18 universities) with colleges—including major universities sioned HERI to analyze data on students nonsectarian four-year colleges and like Creighton, Loyola Marymount, No- at Catholic colleges who participated in other religious (mostly Protestant) four- tre Dame, and St.
    [Show full text]