DOCSLIB.ORG

A Space Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee 2007: A Space Policy Seventh Report of Session 2006–07 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 4 July 2007 HC 66-I Published on 17 July 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of Science and Innovation and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Phil Willis MP (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chairman) Adam Afriyie MP (Conservative, Windsor) Mrs Nadine Dorries MP (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Mr Robert Flello MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Linda Gilroy MP (Labour, Plymouth Sutton) Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Chris Mole MP (Labour/Co-op, Ipswich) Dr Bob Spink MP (Conservative, Castle Point) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner MP (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Previous Members of the Committee during the inquiry Mr Brooks Newmark MP (Conservative, Braintree) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/s&tcom A list of Reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are: Dr Lynn Gardner (Clerk); Dr Celia Blacklock (Second Clerk); Dr Chris Tyler (Committee Specialist); Ana Ferreira (Committee Assistant); Christine McGrane (Committee Secretary); and Jonathan Olivier Wright (Senior Office Clerk). Previous Committee staff during the inquiry Dr Anne Simpson (Committee Specialist); Dr Sarah Bunn (Committee Specialist); and Robert Long (Senior Office Clerk). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Science and Technology Committee, Committee Office, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general inquiries is: 020 7219 2793; the Committee’s e- mail address is: [email protected] 2007: A Space Policy 1 Contents Report Page Summary 5 1 Introduction 7 Our inquiry 7 Relevant recent reports 9 Structure of Report 10 Does space matter? 10 2 Civil space policy in the UK 12 Current UK space policy 12 UK investment in space 12 UK Space Strategy 2003-2006 and beyond 14 Space Strategy 2007-2010 17 Vision 18 Horizon scanning 18 Co-ordination with other strategies 19 Conclusion 19 3 The BNSC 21 The partnership model 22 A user-driven approach to space 24 A UK space agency? 25 Strengthening the partnership 28 BNSC’s profile & status 28 A leadership role for BNSC headquarters 30 Reporting 31 The co-ordination role of BNSC headquarters 32 Resources at BNSC headquarters 33 Relationship with partners 34 Cross-governmental links 36 Involving the space community 38 4 International relations 40 European Space Agency 40 Investment in ESA 41 Future developments 49 European Union and European Commission 51 Bilaterals 53 5 The UK space industry 56 Overview 56 Government support for the space industry 59 Industrial funding through ESA programmes 60 Support at a national level 62 2 2007: A Space Policy Alternative funding mechanisms 65 Targeted support for SMEs 66 Licensing & space monitoring 67 6 Space science and technology 70 Overview 70 Health of space science and technology in the UK 70 Skills 72 Creation of the Science and Technology Facilities Council 73 Current levels of investment 76 7 The ‘technology food chain’ 78 Technology development 78 Funding and the National Space Technology Programme 79 Knowledge transfer 83 The process 83 Facilitating knowledge transfer 84 Technology spin-off 85 8 Earth observation 88 Overview 88 Introduction to Earth observation programmes 89 Funding 90 Use of Earth observation data 92 Co-ordination of Earth observation activities in the UK 93 GMES 94 Funding 95 The lead BNSC partner 99 Applications 100 9 Satellite navigation and telecommunications 102 Satellite navigation 102 Galileo 102 Telecommunications 105 10 Exploration and launchers 108 Exploration 108 ESA’s Aurora programme 108 NASA’s Lunar Programme 109 The Global Space Exploration Strategy 110 Manned spaceflight 112 Arguments around manned spaceflight 112 Costs 114 Future options 116 Space medicine 117 Overview 117 History of the debate 118 Potential for widespread benefit 119 Funding 120 2007: A Space Policy 3 Space tourism 122 Overview 122 Environmental impact 123 Government support & regulation 124 Launchers 126 11 Education & outreach 129 Impact of space 129 Space in education 131 Current activities 131 Co-ordination 132 National Space Education Initiative 133 ESA’s ESERO project 134 Space education materials 135 Outreach 136 12 Conclusion 137 Conclusions and recommendations 138 Abbreviations used in this report 148 Formal minutes 151 Witnesses 152 List of written evidence 154 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 157 2007: A Space Policy 5 Summary Space is a highly significant area of science policy and it is necessary for the Government to take a strategic approach to space activities such as robotic exploration, satellite navigation and Earth observation. The forthcoming civil space strategy should inspire and motivate the UK space sector and emphasise the UK Government’s commitment to space. The strategy is an opportunity for the British National Space Centre to outline clearly its vision and ambition for space. We support the UK’s user-driven approach to space, which focuses on activities which will enhance scientific knowledge and bring benefits to the UK economy and society. There are problems with the current partnership arrangement but if existing levels of expenditure persist, the Government should not establish a space agency but should continue its current approach to space. The partnership should be strengthened by improving its profile, leadership, co-ordination and perhaps a change of name. We recommend that the wider space community be involved through a space forum and that the British National Space Centre Headquarters be provided with a small budget of its own. The space sector has great economic potential. The UK space industry is ambitious and focused. Despite its health state, the industry relied upon Government seedcorn funding. We recommend that the Government review its subscriptions to ESA programmes that support industry through seedcorn funding and establish mechanisms to increase support for SMEs. The space industry is high tech and requires highly skilled workers. We are concerned that there is a skills shortage in the space industry and a broad programme of incentives may be necessary to ensure a continued flow of people into the industry. The UK has world-leading space scientists and technologists. Space science both depends on technology and can drive technology developments. The current lack of a domestic programme to support early stage technology development places the UK at a disadvantage. The proposed National Space Technology Programme could fill this funding gap and we urge the Government to provide appropriate funding for this initiative. We welcome the creation of the Science and Technology Facilities Council and recommend that it ensure that there are no gaps in funding for research in space science. Approximately two thirds of UK investment in space is channelled through the European Space Agency. The UK’s involvement in ESA is worthwhile and the establishment of an ESA centre in the UK would be beneficial. ESA and the EU have been developing two projects: Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES), and Galileo for satellite navigation. The Government has concerns that the GMES programme does not meet user objectives and policy requirements. If these concerns are addressed by the European Space Agency, the Government should consult industry regarding the level of subscription to the programme. There are currently problems in the Galileo programme and we urge the Government to work at a European level to clarify the situation. The UK does not fund launchers to any significant level or participate in human spaceflight programmes. Exploration is crucial to improve knowledge and understanding of space. The Government’s stance should be flexible enough to ensure that the best science 6 2007: A Space Policy can be funded, whether that be undertaken by manned or robotic exploration. Funding for space medicine should be provided by the Medical Research Council and not through a special funding stream. The space tourism industry should be supported by appropriate regulation and there should also be no “in principle” block on funding the development of launchers in future. We suspect that unfortunately the public is still unaware of the variety, breadth and importance that space activities play in their everyday lives. We welcome the plans for the establishment of a European Space Education Resource Office contact point in the UK and hope that this will be the start of a truly national education project. Although there are weaknesses in the organisational structures, funding and co-ordination of space activities, the sector is characterised by an enthusiasm for discovery, research and experimentation. A strong political lead is essential for the UK research and industrial sectors. There are opportunities for the UK to lead developments in areas such as exploration, satellite navigation and Earth observation. It is crucial that the Government increases funding for space programmes now in order to benefit future generations. 2007: A Space Policy 7 1 Introduction 1. Space has intrigued and inspired humankind for centuries. The unexplored vastness of space tempts questions, such as whether life exists elsewhere or whether humans could survive without the Earth.
Recommended publications
  • Space Age The

    Space Age The

    SPACE SCIENCE THE NEW SPACE AGE 4 TWAS Newsletter, Vol. 26 No. 4, 2014 SPECIAL report: Space SCIENCE India is orbiting Mars. China is on the Moon. Even nations like Turkmenistan, Ecuador and Malaysia are sending satellites aloft. But what do they all hope to accomplish? by Sean Treacy ot long ago, a 41-metre rocket thrust off a space age joined by nations great and small. Nlaunch pad in China and ascended toward At least 35 developing countries now have space. Once it escaped Earth’s atmosphere, their own space agencies, and about the same it released a little cube, only 10-by-10-by-10 number have had a satellite in orbit. In the two centimetres. And then, as the cube slowly years since Pegaso’s launch, Peru, Uruguay and stretched out the solar panels on its sides and Turkmenistan have also reached Earth’s orbit drifted into orbit, a control room in Ecuador for the first time. Other countries, such as Costa burst into applause. Rica, Ethiopia and Tunisia, are planning to finish The box was Ecuador’s first satellite – a their first satellites in coming years. compact, inexpensive device called a CubeSat. Mazlan Othman, Malaysia’s first astrophysicist This one was named Pegaso – Spanish for and the former director of the United Nations Pegasus – and on 26 April 2013 it was the Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), said centre of attention for a huge portion of this drive for developing countries to enter Ecuador’s 15 million people. In the days after space science is partly due to space’s special the launch they toasted to Pegaso across the power to instill optimism.
  • Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration

    Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration

    1 ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY Burlington House, Piccadilly London W1J 0BQ, UK T: 020 7734 4582/ 3307 F: 020 7494 0166 [email protected] www.ras.org.uk Registered Charity 226545 Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration Professor Frank Close, OBE Dr John Dudeney, OBE Professor Ken Pounds, CBE FRS 2 Contents (A) Executive Summary 3 (B) The Formation and Membership of the Commission 6 (C) The Terms of Reference 7 (D) Summary of the activities/meetings of the Commission 8 (E) The need for a wider context 8 (E1) The Wider Science Context (E2) Public inspiration, outreach and educational Context (E3) The Commercial/Industrial context (E4) The Political and International context. (F) Planetary Science on the Moon & Mars 13 (G) Astronomy from the Moon 15 (H) Human or Robotic Explorers 15 (I) Costs and Funding issues 19 (J) The Technological Challenge 20 (J1) Launcher Capabilities (J2) Radiation (K) Summary 23 (L) Acknowledgements 23 (M) Appendices: Appendix 1 Expert witnesses consulted & contributions received 24 Appendix 2 Poll of UK Astronomers 25 Appendix 3 Poll of Public Attitudes 26 Appendix 4 Selected Web Sites 27 3 (A) Executive Summary 1. Scientific missions to the Moon and Mars will address questions of profound interest to the human race. These include: the origins and history of the solar system; whether life is unique to Earth; and how life on Earth began. If our close neighbour, Mars, is found to be devoid of life, important lessons may be learned regarding the future of our own planet. 2. While the exploration of the Moon and Mars can and is being addressed by unmanned missions we have concluded that the capabilities of robotic spacecraft will fall well short of those of human explorers for the foreseeable future.
  • CEAS Quarterly Bulletin Talented Engineers Are Needed

    CEAS Quarterly Bulletin Talented Engineers Are Needed

    The Quarterly Bulletin of the COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN AEROSPACE SOCIETIES 3AF– AIAE– AIDAA– DGLR– FSAE– FTF– HAES– NVvL– RAeS– SVFW–TsAGI • GENERAL • AERONAUTICS • SPACE • Issue 2 – 2009 • June • Editorial INVESTING IN YOUTH The future of Europe is in the hands of its youth: this is a basic truth. However, surprisingly, while we are full in course of the election campaign for the renewal of the European Parliament, we hear almost nothing about education and culture, and we see no proposals from the candidates on how to prepare the students and young professionals to live in an increasingly integrated Europe. The question is a very broad and difficult one, due to the large number of Member States and the diversity of languages and cultures; but this is all the more reason to concentrate great efforts on it. In the aerospace sector, the projects, more and more complex, are developed across several national borders and include the highest technologies. So, to overcome the Jean-Pierre Sanfourche numerous challenges which confront us in a fierce world-wide aerospace market, Editor-in-Chief, CEAS Quarterly Bulletin talented engineers are needed. Unfortunately, in the past two or three decades within Europe, there have been clear indications that the most brilliant students pre- fer careers in business and finance to those in science, technology and engineering. Action is clearly necessary to reverse this trend by taking the measures that will CONTENTS allow us to attract and then retain the best talent in the air and space activities. The GENERAL Pages organising Committee of the upcoming CEAS2009 Air & Space Conference in Manchester has taken an important step in this direction by including in the • The ASD President’s message 2 Conference agenda the launch of a new European Young Aerospace Professional • The life of the CEAS 4 (EYAP) forum.
  • August 2011 Updates UNSPIDER

    August 2011 Updates UNSPIDER

    UN-SPIDER November 2011 Updates Please forward this issue of UN-SPIDER Updates to colleagues who might Follow UN-SPIDER on benefit from receiving the information. If you would like to subscribe to this list please visit the following website: http://mail.un-spider.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unspider UN-SPIDER News 1. UN-SPIDER Conference in Beijing UN-SPIDER organised the “United Nations Conference on Space-based Technologies for Disaster Management - Best Practices for Risk Reduction and Rapid Response Mapping” on 22-25 November 2011. The conference brought together 128 participants from 42 countries representing 93 national, regional and international organizations, non-government organizations, the private sector and academia representing all the continents. Participants represented civil protection agencies, emergency management organizations, space agencies, remote sensing agencies, research institutions, ministries of environment and natural resources, science and technology bureaus, and other government and non-government agencies. The conference included 7 plenary sessions that incorporated 36 presentations from the experts and users of the technology, 3 side meetings and 3 breakout discussion sessions. It covered a range of topics including advancements in technology, best practices in disaster risk management, experiences in rapid response mapping, etc. Outcomes and impacts of the recent UN-SPIDER technical advisory missions were discussed. For further information and the Conference Report >> UN-SPIDER 2. Second UN-SPIDER International Expert Meeting: Crowdsource Mapping for Preparedness and Emergency Response which took place in Geneva, Switzerland on 16 November 2011 This one-day Expert Meeting brought together 72 experts and practitioners from 21 countries. This second Expert Meeting was purposely organised back-to-back with the International Conference on Crisis Mapping (ICCM 2011) (http://crisismappers.net/page/iccm-geneva-2011).
  • A Clearer Final Frontier of the Sentinel Family of Earth-Monitoring Satellites

    A Clearer Final Frontier of the Sentinel Family of Earth-Monitoring Satellites

    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS Station. His examination of other astro- nomical and exploration cooperation efforts is somewhat cursory, and there are small errors. The Rosetta mission of the Euro- pean Space Agency (ESA), for instance, is ROGER HARRIS/SPL not a solar mission, but instead will rendez- vous with and observe a comet. The lunar probe Chandrayaan-1 was a collaboration between India, ESA, NASA and Bulgaria; and unmentioned is the ground-breaking Double Star Sino-European joint mission. Failures in cooperation offer many lessons, and Moltz looks at the International Solar Polar Mission almost 25 years ago, as well as the United States’ 2012 pull-out from collaboration with ESA on Mars explora- tion. However, he misses the pivotal case of the International Gamma-Ray Laboratory (INTEGRAL), launched in 2002, the absence of expected levels of US support for which led to the first close ESA Science Programme cooperation with Russia. The distinction between cooperation and competition had, however, emerged decades before, with US refusal to launch the Franco-German com- munications satellite Symphonie. Europe learnt that it had to go it alone in using space for commercial or near-to-market purposes. Satellite deployment must be regulated to keep space usable and safe. Moltz accepts that space is important to commerce, but readers might query whether SPACE POLICY he sees how this may drive regulation. The European Union, the largest economic grouping in the world, is this year launching multiple spacecraft; these include members A clearer final frontier of the Sentinel family of Earth-monitoring satellites. The move is economic, and the use David Southwood finds that a study on safeguarding of space is evolving and increasingly focused space is shorter on cooperation than conflict.
  • "I Think You Need a Pioneering Spirit in Society, a Frontier Spirit."

    "I Think You Need a Pioneering Spirit in Society, a Frontier Spirit."

    The Profile "I think you need a pioneering spirit in society, a frontier spirit." “There is a limit to how far I should, Professor David Southwood is the personally, because I feel like I am a general Director of Science in ESA, a post he has advancing on a wide front, and there is nothing that tells me that I should advance first on one front. I had for almost two years. During these have got to advance on many fronts. As a result, the two years he has made his mark through organised way to do it, like a general, is to advance the Cosmic Vision, engaging in finding new your forces on one front, make sure they have got the resources and backup, and then advance on other ways to explore space within ESA. fronts, consolidating, and so on. In other words, we cannot advance on all fronts at the same time. But by Nordic Space Activities met David having a plan we can advance on all fronts in time. I think there is nothing that can tell me there is one Southwood at ESTEC early this April, branch of science in need of Europe’s attention and asked him: entirely. Europe is too big a collection of counties to simply say it does only one kind of space science. It Today you talked about the Cosmic Vision, the should cover the frontier.” new way to go for European space research. Are the large resources that have been used for space The space research budgets have steadily research necessary to secure the future development decreased the last few years.
  • European-African Partnership in Satellite Applications for Sustainable Development

    European-African Partnership in Satellite Applications for Sustainable Development

    This report was prepared under the auspices of the 2010 Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union European-African Partnership in Satellite Applications for Sustainable Development A Comprehensive Mapping of European-African Actors and Activities Report 26 September 2010 Christina Giannopapa Short title: ESPI Report 26 ISSN: 2076-6688 Published in September 2010 Price: €11 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 26; September 2010. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before pub- lishing. This report was prepared under the auspices of the 2010 Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with ESPI. The printing of the report was made possible thanks to the support of the Belgian High Representation for Space Policy. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 26 2 September 2010 European-African Partnership in Satellite Applications for Sustainable Development Table of Contents Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1 The setting 12 1.2 Approach of the Study 12 2.
  • National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013

    National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013

    National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013 Introduction projects – a massive injection of innovation into the blood stream of the UK’s space sector. Meanwhile, the Welcome to the second edition of the UK Space programme of scientific instruments has reached a Agency’s National Space Programmes brochure. milestone with the delivery of MIRI for the James Webb This document contains financial and management Space Telescope, the result of over a decade’s hard information about our suite of National Space work by the UK-led European consortium. The national Programmes, provided in order to give you an insight exploration and the Earth observation technology into the wide range of investment we are making in programmes have also made good progress, while the UK’s space sector. both UKube-1 and TechDemoSat-1 are preparing for launch in 2013. It is going to be another exciting year. It is now approaching two years since the Agency’s full establishment. During this time the UK space sector We hope you find the brochure valuable. It’s hard has continued to grow, as has its contribution to the to capture the huge range of projects that the UK economy as a whole, currently thought to be £9.1 Space Agency has underway in a few pages. For billion a year and directly employing 28,900 people. further information and also to download our other The average growth rate of the UK space sector is publications, please see our website: almost 7.5%; the National Space Programmes are in http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency place to complement our investments in a range of European Space Agency, European Commission and And don’t forget to sign up for our monthly newsletter bilateral projects in order to further this growth in line and follow us on Twitter - @spacegovuk ! with the six themes of our civil space strategy: Dr.
  • Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: the British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965

    Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: the British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen's University Research Portal Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965 Dunnett, O. (2017). Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1247267 Published in: Geopolitics Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2016 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:09. Sep. 2018 Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965 Oliver Dunnett, Queen’s University Belfast Post-print version of article submitted to Geopolitics Introduction British involvement in spaceflight has, in recent years, been the subject of increased interest in popular and scientific circles, driven by events such as the British astronaut Major Tim Peake’s stay on the International Space Station in 2015-16, British scientists’ involvement in the European Space Agency’s ‘Philae’ comet lander project in 2014, and the establishment of a UK Space Agency in 2010.
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor

    Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor

    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 2 May–June 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 European industrial leadership at stake ............................................................................ 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 2 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 2 9th EU-ESA Space Council .......................................................................................... 2 Europe’s Martian ambitions take shape ......................................................................... 2 ESA’s advancements on Planetary Defence Systems ........................................................... 2 ESA prepares for rescuing Humans on Moon .................................................................... 3 ESA’s private partnerships ......................................................................................... 3 ESA’s international cooperation with Japan .................................................................... 3 New EU Parliament, new EU European Space Policy? ......................................................... 3 France reflects on its competitiveness and defence posture in space ...................................... 3 Germany joins consortium to support a European reusable rocket.........................................
  • Huygens Landing Site to Be Named After Hubert Curien 5 March 2007

    Huygens Landing Site to Be Named After Hubert Curien 5 March 2007

    Huygens landing site to be named after Hubert Curien 5 March 2007 As of 14 March, an epic space mission and one of had to decide how to build a solid space science the founding fathers of the European space programme and ensure that it would be financially endeavour will be forever linked. sustainable in the long term." ESA, the international Committee for Space "ESA's present science programme, Cosmic Vision, Research (COSPAR) and NASA have decided to draws on the heritage left by Hubert Curien", said honour Professor Hubert Curien’s contribution to Professor David Southwood, ESA's current Director European space by naming the Huygens landing of Science. "He encouraged cooperation between site on Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, after him. nations in the belief that space research is The naming ceremony for the Huygens landing fundamental to the progress and welfare of a site, which will be known as the "Hubert Curien knowledge-based society like ours. He also Memorial Station", will be held at ESA’s promoted the concept of long-term planning", he Headquarters on 14 March, in the presence of continued. "It would seem almost inconceivable ESA Council delegates and of Professor Curien’s today to initiate any space venture without such wife, Mrs Perrine Curien, and one of their sons. pillar concepts in mind". Media interested in attending are invited to submit the reply form below. "The role played by Hubert Curien in creating a European space dimension, with all its various Huygens' landing on Saturn’s largest moon in facets, has been absolutely essential", said Jean- January 2005 represented one of the greatest Jacques Dordain, ESA Director General.
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    The 2008 Annual Report of the International Space Exploration Coordination Group Released March 2009 International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) – Annual Report:2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) – Annual Report:2008 CONTENTS Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… 4 Part 1: The Role of the ISECG 1.1 Overview …………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.2 Working Groups of the ISECG …………………………………………………… 7 1.2.1 Enhancement of Public Engagement …………………………………………… 7 1.2.2 Establishment of Relationships with Existing International Working Groups …. 7 1.2.3 The International Space Exploration Coordination Tool (INTERSECT) ……. 8 1.2.4 The Space Exploration Interface Standards Working Group (ISWG) ………….. 8 1.2.5 Mapping the Space Exploration Journey ………………………………………... 8 Part 2: Current and Near-Term Activities of ISECG Members 2.1 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) …………………………………………………………… 10 2.1.1 The International Space Station (ISS) …………………………………………… 10 2.1.2 Emerging Government Capabilities …………………………………………….. 10 2.1.3 Emerging Commercial Providers ……………………………………………….. 11 2.2 Beyond LEO – The Moon and Mars ……………………………………………….. 11 2.2.1 Moon ……………………………………………………………………………… 11 2.2.2 Mars ………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Part 3: Progress in 2008 towards Opportunities for Integrated and Collaborative Space Exploration 3.1 Robotic Network Science – The International Lunar Network ……………………… 16 3.2 Joint Development for Robotic Exploration – Mars Sample Return ………………………… 17 3.3 Collaborative