DOCSLIB.ORG

The Foreign Contacts of Carl Goerdeler

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Foreign Contacts of Carl Goerdeler Opponents ofHitler in search offoreign support: the foreign contacts ofCarl Goerdeler, Ludwig Beck, Ernst von Weizsilcker and Adam von Trott zu Solz, 1937-1940 Andrea Mason Department ofHistory, McGiII University, Montréal August 2002 A thesis submitted to the Faculty ofGraduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements ofthe degree ofMaster ofArts © Andrea Mason, 2002 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisisitons et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 0-612-85867-7 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 0-612-85867-7 The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou aturement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Canada Abstract This thesis examines the attempts made by Carl Goerdeler, Ludwig Beck, Ernst von Weizsacker and Adam von Trott zu Solz to obtain the support ofthe British government in their effort to overthrow the Nazi regime between 1937 and 1940. The circumstances surrounding each mission are detailed, including the degree ofreadiness on the part ofthe German opposition for a coup d'état and the particular form ofsupport sought from the British to increase the chance ofsuccess in each case. Consideration is given to the factors which conditioned the British reaction to the resistance emissaries, including the British foreign policy imperatives ofthe moment, important events in European relations and the attitude and degree ofinfluence wielded by the statesmen to whom the German resistance emissaries addressed themselves. Résumé Cette thèse examine les tentatives de Carl Goerdeler, Ludwig Beck, Ernst von Weizsacker et Adam von Trott zu Solz d'obtenir, entre les années 1937 à 1940, le soutien du gouvernement britanniquç afm de renverser le régime nazi. Les circonstances de chaque mission sont exposées en détail, y compris la disposition de la résistance allemande à effectuer un coup d'état et le genre précis de soutien demandé aux Britanniques pour augmenter les chances de succès des missions respectives. Une attention particulière est prêtée aux facteurs qui ont influencé la réaction des Britanniques aux émissaires de la résistance, dont les lignes directrices de la politique étrangère britannique de l'époque, les événements fondamentaux des relations européennes, et les comportements des chefs d'état contactés par la résistance ainsi que leur influence. Acknowledgements This thesis is dedicated to my parents, Robert and Janet Mason, in gratitude for 25 years of unfailing support and encouragement. 1 am deeply indebted to Professor Peter Hoffinann for introducing me to the subject of the German Resistance, for his careful guidance and for his rigorous and patient supervision of my work. 1 would like to thank my grandparents, Douglas and Louise Hawes, whose belief in the value of education and great generosity have allowed me to pursue my studies. 1 would also like to thank my sister Cari for putting everything in perspective, my grandparents Ernest and Jessie Mason and my friend Jessica Lim for their kind support. 1 am grateful to Colleen Parish for aH the help that she has given me and to Professors John Hellman, Brian Lewis and Gershon Hundert for their instruction, advice and assistance during the last few years. 1 am obliged to Frau Lore Kordt for granting me access to the papers of Erich and Theodor Kordt at the Institut fiir Zeitgeschichte in Munich. And fmally, 1 owe an incalculable debt of gratitude to my fiancé Mateo for the innumerable ways in which he assisted in the completion of this work from beginning to end, from the suggestions for improvement to the dinners to the photocopy fiasco to the schedules to the enormous loads ofbooks ferried back and forth between home and the library. You have helped me immensely. With al! my love: thankyou. Table ofContents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Historiography 1.1 lIistoriography ofAppeasement 6 1.2 Historiography ofGerman Resistance 15 Chapter 2: Approaches orthe German Resistance, May 1937-September 1938 2.1 Dr Carl Goerdeler 21 2.2 General Ludwig Beek 30 2.3 Ewald von Kleist-Sehmenzin 37 2.4 Ernst von Weizsacker 40 2.5 Theodor and Erich Kordt 42 2.6 Carl Goerdeler 48 Chapter 3: British Poticy, May 1937-September 1938 3.1 Appeasement 50 3.2 The Sudeten Crisis 57 3.3 The Opposition After Munich 68 Chapter 4: October 1938-June 1939 4.1 Carl Goerdeler 71 4.2 Hitler's Provocations 75 4.3 British Poticy Between Munich and Prague 77 4.4 British Poticy After Prague 79 Chapter 5: June-September 1939 5.1 Adam von Trott zu Solz 83 5.2 Theodor and Erich Kordt 96 5.3 Anglo-Soviet Negotiations 100 Chapter 6: September 1939-May 1940 6.1 British Policy After the Outbreak ofWar 107 6.2 The Vatican Exchanges 110 Conclusion 117 jJibliography 120 1 Introduction From the time ofAdolfHitler's seizure ofpower in January 1933, there were individuals within the German state apparatus who opposed his rule and engaged in activities aimed at bringing about the end ofthe Nazi dictatorship. By the later 1930s, these individuals had coalesced to form a resistance movement1 whose objective was the overthrow ofthe Nazi state. Between 1937 and 1940, members ofthis resistance movement attempted on numerous different occasions to secure foreign support, especially that ofthe British government, in their bid to remove Hitler from power. The primary objective ofthe German opposition was the preservation ofpeace in Europe, an aim that stoOO counter to Hitler's decision to expand German territory by military conquest. Having determined that Hitler posed a serious threat to peace, order, stability and sound government both in Germany and in Europe, the German resisters resolved to remove him from power. They sought to obtain foreign co-operation, particularly that ofthe British government, to improve their chances ofeffecting a successful coup d'état. The motivations and goals which prompted the German resistance to seek the support of the British government varied between 1937 and 1940 according to the German domestic situation, the readiness ofthe opposition to launch a coup, the string ofcrises which then characterised international relations in Europe and the evolution ofBritish foreign policy. During the Sudeten crisis of1938, the emissaries ofthe German resistance tried to persuade the British government to adopt an uncompromising position vis à vis Hitler's territorial demands in 1 It should he notOO that under the conditions ofextreme oppression which existed in Nazi Germany, resistance to the régime may he definOO as any statement or action which indicatOO disagreement with or criticism ofthe policies and practices ofthe govemment. Resistance may have involved anyaction the objective ofwhich was to obstruct the aims ofthe régime. For the purpose ofthis study, however, 1will employ German resistance movement to mean those who actively engagOO in the attempt to bring down the state in an organised fashion. Examples ofdecrees introduced by the Nazis which were designOO to suppress aIl criticism ofthe state inc1ude Decree ofthe Reich President against Treason toward the German People andAgainst High Treasonous Machinations, datOO 28 February 1933. This decree made the communication ofstatements offact to foreign govemments punishable by imprisonment, regardless ofwhether the information reportOO was true or false and regardless ofwhether the particular foreign govemment was already aware ofthe information. Reichgesetzblatt J, 1933, 85-7. The Decree ofthe Reich Presidentfor Defence against Jnsidious Attacks against the Government ofthe National Resurgence, datOO 21 March 1933, made uttering a faetually untrue statement which could cause harm to state interests or to the stature ofthe government a crime punishable by three years to life in prison if the statement was intendOO to cause a disturbance among the German people. In certain cases, the punishment could he execution. Reichgesetzblatt J, 1933, 135. The Decree ofthe Reich Governmentfor the Constitution ofSpecial Courts, issuOO on 21 March 1933, provided for the establishment ofspecial courts (Sondergerichte). These special courts were investOO with the authority to arrest and imprison suspects for unlimitOO periods oftime. The special courts were authorised to maintain concentration camps. The judge in such a court could render a decision without hearing evidence. Reichgesetzblatt, J, 1933, 136. 2 the hope that such a stance would discourage the dictator and save the peace. Emissaries ofthe resistance movement continued to initiate contact after the Sudeten crisis, although with diminished hope ofpersuading the British government to stand frrm. After the outbreak ofwar in September 1939, the principal aim ofthe resisters
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Houck 1 Alex Houck Undergraduate Seminar Dr. Hindmarch-Watson May 15, 2018 the Failure to Unite Resistance to the Nazi Regime
    Houck 1 Alex Houck Undergraduate Seminar Dr. Hindmarch-Watson May 15, 2018 The Failure to Unite Resistance to the Nazi Regime existed in all branches of German society both before and during World War II. The most prominent group of resisters consisted of members of the German elite and military. In 1944, the group was responsible for the failed assassination attempt and coup d'etat against Hitler, but the group had been in existence before the war even began. Many attempts were made by people in the Resistance to gain crucial support from the West, but in spite of sharing a common enemy in the Nazis, all of the attempts met with failure. In 1938, the group wanted to launch a coup d'etat to prevent Hitler from invading Czechoslovakia and starting what they believed would be a war with Britain and France.1 The Resistance hoped that the British would take a firm stance against Hitler. This contact was the first in a series of attempts by the German Resistance to gain external support from the Allies prior to and during the war. All of the attempts met with failure for a variety of reasons. Scholars have focused predominantly on the communication between between the conservative German group and the British during the war. Not as much work has been done to analyze the relationship between the German Resistance and the United States. Separate communication was made to the United States starting in late 1941 and continuing up until July 20th, 1944.2 The United States was exercised tremendous influence in the Grand Alliance; had 1 Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Tribunal, Indictments
    MILITARY TRIBUNALS Case No. 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -against- WILHELM' VON LEEB, HUGO SPERRLE, GEORG KARL FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON KUECHLER, JOHANNES BLASKOWITZ, HERMANN HOTH, HANS REINHARDT. HANS VON SALMUTH, KARL HOL­ LIDT, .OTTO SCHNmWIND,. KARL VON ROQUES, HERMANN REINECKE., WALTERWARLIMONT, OTTO WOEHLER;. and RUDOLF LEHMANN. Defendants OFFICE OF MILITARY GOVERNMENT FOR GERMANY (US) NORNBERG 1947 • PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTORY 1 COUNT ONE-CRIMES AGAINST PEACE 6 A Austria 'and Czechoslovakia 7 B. Poland, France and The United Kingdom 9 C. Denmark and Norway 10 D. Belgium, The Netherland.; and Luxembourg 11 E. Yugoslavia and Greece 14 F. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 17 G. The United states of America 20 . , COUNT TWO-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST ENEMY BELLIGERENTS AND PRISONERS OF WAR 21 A: The "Commissar" Order , 22 B. The "Commando" Order . 23 C, Prohibited Labor of Prisoners of Wal 24 D. Murder and III Treatment of Prisoners of War 25 . COUNT THREE-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS 27 A Deportation and Enslavement of Civilians . 29 B. Plunder of Public and Private Property, Wanton Destruc­ tion, and Devastation not Justified by Military Necessity. 31 C. Murder, III Treatment and Persecution 'of Civilian Popu- lations . 32 COUNT FOUR-COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY 39 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF MILITARY POSITIONS HELD BY THE DEFENDANTS AND CO-PARTICIPANTS 40 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ INDICTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome of the International Military Tribunal ( Imt)
    OUTCOME OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL ( IMT) DEFENDANTS POSITION IN REICH SENTENCE RESULTS Hermann Goering Reich Marshal and Commander of the Luftwaffe Death Suicide Rudolf Hess Deputy Fuhrer Life in Prison Died in prison Joachim von Ribbentrip Reich Foreign Minister Death Hanged 10/16/46 Wilhelm Keitel Chief of the Armed Forces High Command Death Hanged 10/16/46 Ernst Kaltenbrunner Chief of the SD and head of RSHA Death Hanged 10/16/46 Alfred Rosenberg Reich Minister for the Eastern Occupied Areas Death Hanged 10/16/46 Hans Frank Governor-General of General Government Death Hanged 10/16/46 Wilhelm Frick Minister of the Interior Death Hanged 10/16/46 Julius Streicher Founder of Der Sturmer, Gauleiter of Franconia Death Hanged 10/16/46 Fritz Sauckel Plenipotentiary General for manpower Death Hanged 10/16/46 Alfred Jodl Chief of Armed Forces High Command Operations Death Hanged 10/16/46 Martin Bormann (in abstentia) Deputy Fuhrer, Head of the Chancellery Death Never Captured Franz von Papen Ambassador to Vienna and Turkey Acquitted Arthur Seyss-Inquart Reich Commissioner for Occupied Netherlands Death Hanged 10/16/46 Albert Speer Minister of Armaments and War Production 20 years Served full term Konstantine Freiherr Minister of Foreign Affairs, Reich Protector of 15 years Served 8 years Von Neurath Bohemia and Moravia Hjalmar Schacht Minister of Economics, President of Reichsbank Acquitted Walter Funk President of Reichsbank Life in prison Died in prison Karl Donitz Supreme Commander of the Navy, Chancellor 10 years Served full term Erich Raeder Supreme Commander of the Navy Life in prison Served 9 years Baldur von Schirach Leader of Hitler Youth, Gauleiter of Vienna 20 years Served full term Hans Fritzsche Head of Radio Division, Propaganda Ministry Acquitted These men were tried on the charges of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • The German High Command and the Failure of the Offensive in the Soviet Union, Autumn 1941
    Rejecting Catastrophe: the German High Command and the Failure of the Offensive in the Soviet Union, Autumn 1941 Geoffrey P. Megargee On August 11, 1941, Generaloberst Franz Halder, Chief of the German General Staff, recorded his impression of the campaign in the Soviet Union so far: The whole situation makes it increasingly plain that we have underestimated the Russian colossus, which consistently prepared for war with that utterly ruthless determination so characteristic of totalitarian states. At the outset of the war, we reckoned with about 200 enemy divisions. Now we have already counted 360. Indeed these new divisions are not armed and equipped according to our standards, and their tactical leadership is often poor. But they are there, and if we smash a dozen of them, the Russians simply put up another dozen.1 Here, just seven weeks after the Wehrmacht launched its invasion of the USSR, and five weeks after he had pronounced the campaign essentially won, Halder began to show the first signs of doubt in the course of the fight. He refused to give in to such thoughts, however, and instead clung to the belief that innate German superiority and the Wehrmacht’s professionalism would win through in the struggle against a militarily inept, subhuman Communist foe. Like his colleagues in the German high command, he apparently never questioned his fundamental attitudes and assumptions, even after the campaign’s extension into 1942 became unavoidable.2 In order to understand the German military leaders’ reaction to the prolongation of the war with the Soviet Union, we must first examine German intentions and expectations at the start, which displayed a mix of military hubris and racist arrogance.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Thè Nazi Elite
    of thè Nazi Elite -v\ . t -. '• ' • > PI \(>l IN' Contents List of Illustrations XÌÌÌ Acknowledgements XVÌ Preface xvii Abbreviations xxì Part I Interrogations: an Introduction 1 Outlaw Country 3 The Criminals 25 The Charges 43 Asking thè Questions 57 The Absentees: Hitler, Himmler, Bormann 93 Selective Amnesia? The Case of Hess 115 The Helpful Speer 129 The Unrepentant Goerìng MI The Limits of Responsibility: Strategies of Denial 155 Confessing to Genocìde 175 *I hope they hang ali': Final Retribution 201 Part II Interrogations: thè Transcripts 209 Note on thè Transcripts 211 x Contents Perspectives on thè Fuehrer 213 Document 1 thè driving force' [Albert Speer] 215 Document2 Hitler's Women [Karl Brandt] 258 Document3 The New Feudalism [Hans Lammers] 272 Document 4 Hitler thè Warlord [Alfred Jodl] 276 'The world's worst criminal': Goering in thè Third Reich 285 Document 5 A Souvenir from Monte Cassino [Hermann Goering] 288 Document 6 The Commander-in-Chief [Hermann Goering] 296 Document 7 Conquest by Telephone [Hermann Goering] 307 Document 7b Vote 'No' if you dare [Albert Goering] 312 Waging War 315 Document 8 Ribbentrop, Hitler and War [ Joachim von Ribbentrop] 318 Document 9 Hitler's 'chess game of power politics' [Albert Speer] 323 Document 10 OKW at War [Wilhelm Keitel] 335 Genocide 353 Document li The Fuehrer Order [Dieter Wisliceny] 355 Document 12 A Morbid Accounting [Dieter Wisliceny] 361 Document 13 'incredible things at Auschwitz' 371 [Ernst von Gottstein and Eugen Horak] Document 14 A Doctor at Dachau [Franz Blaha] 374 Document
    [Show full text]
  • The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths About German War Crimes Then and Now
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern University Honors Program Theses 2020 The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths about German War Crimes Then and Now Narayan J. Saviskas Jr. Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the European History Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Saviskas, Narayan J. Jr., "The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths about German War Crimes Then and Now" (2020). University Honors Program Theses. 474. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/474 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths about German War Crimes Then and Now An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History. By Narayan Saviskas Under the mentorship of Dr. Brian Feltman. ABSTRACT On October 1st, 1946, the Nuremberg high command trails ended. The executions and life sentences of representatives of the German military and political elite were carried out by the Allied powers. At the time, the Soviet Union posed a greater threat than the Germans tried at Nuremberg. Years later, on October 9th, 1950, former officers of the German military gathered in Himmerod Abbey. Together they wrote the Himmerod Memorandum, which laid the foundation of the German rearmament and called for the release of German soldiers (Wehrmacht) and Schutzstaffel (SS) members convicted of war crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirchubel on Citino, 'The Wehrmacht's Last Stand: the German Campaigns of 1944-1945'
    H-War Kirchubel on Citino, 'The Wehrmacht's Last Stand: The German Campaigns of 1944-1945' Review published on Saturday, May 5, 2018 Robert M. Citino. The Wehrmacht's Last Stand: The German Campaigns of 1944-1945. Modern War Studies Series. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2017. Illustrations, maps. 632 pp. $34.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-7006-2494-2. Reviewed by Robert Kirchubel (Purdue University)Published on H-War (May, 2018) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air War College) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=51318 Robert M. Citino, presently at the National WWII Museum, has again teamed up with the University Press of Kansas for his latest installment on modern German military history. The Wehrmacht’s Last Stand investigates Germany’s final battles against the Soviet Union and the Western Allies to its east, south, and west. As we have come to expect from Citino, the book is thoroughly researched, clearly narrated, and tightly argued. While Wehrmacht’s Last Stand synthesizes a great number of secondary materials—a review of its bibliography reveals only a couple pre-1945 German military journals that could be considered primary sources—it is full of new insights and thought-provoking interpretations of key events in late World War II.[1] Citino takes military historians to school by demonstrating how operational history should be written, at a time when elements of the academy consider that subdiscipline passé and of doubtful utility. The Wehrmacht had a good run during the first two years of the war, then a couple years of transition (notably against the USSR), but in Wehrmacht’s Last Stand it is reeling backward on every front.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious and Secular Responses to Nazism: Coordinated and Singular Acts of Opposition
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 Religious And Secular Responses To Nazism: Coordinated And Singular Acts Of Opposition Kathryn Sullivan University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Sullivan, Kathryn, "Religious And Secular Responses To Nazism: Coordinated And Singular Acts Of Opposition" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 891. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/891 RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR RESPONSES TO NAZISM COORDINATED AND SINGULAR ACTS OF OPPOSITION by KATHRYN M. SULLIVAN B.A. University of Central Florida, 2003 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2006 © 2006 Kathryn M. Sullivan ii ABSTRACT My intention in conducting this research is to satisfy the requirements of earning a Master of Art degree in the Department of History at the University of Central Florida. My research aim has been to examine literature written from the 1930’s through 2006 which chronicles the lives of Jewish and Gentile German men, women, and children living under Nazism during the years 1933-1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Hortensienstrasse 50. the Kreisau Circle and the 20Th of July Thomas Childers University of Tennessee - Knoxville
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1971 Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July Thomas Childers University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Childers, Thomas, "Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1971. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3110 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Thomas Childers entitled "Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Arthur G. Haas, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Edward Chmielewski, Edwin H. Trainer, Galen Broeker Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) July 19, 1971 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Thomas Childers entitled "Hortensienstrasse 50. The Kreisau Circle and the 20th of July." I recommend that it be accepted for twelve quarter hours of credit in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of ·Science( with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #27 Military Planning and National Policy: German Overtures to Two World Wars Harold C
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #27 Military Planning and National Policy: German Overtures to Two World Wars Harold C. Deutsch, 1984 The celebrated dictum of Carl von Clausewitz that war is the continuation of policy has bred variants which, although not necessarily contradictory, approach the problem of war and peace rather differently. Social revolutionists, notably Lenin, like to switch emphasis by perceiving peace as a moderated form of conflict. Our concern here, the interplay between military planning and preparation for war with the form and con duct of national policy, has less to do with maxims than with actuality in human affairs. The backgrounds of the two world wars of our century tell us much about this problem. They also indicate how greatly accidents of circumstance and personality may play a role in the course of events. This was notably true of Germany whose fate provides the central thread for the epoch of the two world conflicts. At some future time they may yet be known historically as "the German Wars." This is not to infer that, had Germany not existed as a nation, and, let us say, France and Russia had been geographic neighbors, the first half of our century would have been an era of peace. Some of the factors that led to international stress would have been at work in any event. But the reality of Germany's existence largely determined the nature and sequence of affairs as they appeared to march inexorably toward disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bibliography
    Bibliography Adair, Paul, Hitler’s Greatest Defeat, London, 1994 Addison, Paul and Crang, Jeremy (eds.), Listening to Britain, London, 2010 Agte, Patrick, Michael Wittman and the Waffen SS Tiger Commanders of the Leibstandarte in World War II, 2 vols, Mechanicsburg, Pa, 2006 Alanbrooke, Field Marshal Lord, War Diaries, 1939–1945, London, 2001 Aleksandrov, I. G. (ed.), Marshal Zhukov: Polkovodets i chelovek, 2 vols, Moscow, 1988 Alexander of Tunis, Field-Marshal Earl, The Alexander Memoirs, 1940–1945, London, 1962 Allen, Louis, Burma: The Longest War, London, 1984 Alphand, Hervé, L’Étonnement d’être: journal, 1939–1973, Paris, 1977 Altman, I. (ed.), Sokhrani moi pisma [Keep my letters], Moscow, 2007 Altner, Helmut, Berlin Dance of Death, Staplehurst, Kent, 2002 Aly, Götz, Hitler’s Beneficiaries: How the Nazis Bought the German People, New York, 2006 (Hitlers Volksstaat, Frankfurt am Main, 2005) Aly, Götz and Heim, Susanne, Architects of Annihilation: Auschwitz and the Logic of Destruction, London, 2002 Amouroux, Henri, La Grande Histoire des Français sous l’occupation: joies et douleurs du peuple libéré, vol. viii, Paris, 1988 Andrew, Christopher and Gordievsky, Oleg, KGB: The Inside Story of its Foreign Operations from Lenin to Gorbachev, London, 1990 Andrew, Christopher and Mitrokhin, Vasiliy, The Mitrokhin Archive: The KGB in Europe and the West, London, 2000 Anonymous, A Woman in Berlin, London, 2005 (Eine Frau in Berlin) Antonov, Vitaly (ed.), ‘Ot party do obeliska’ [From school desk to the obelisk], in Nasha voina [Our war], Moscow, 2005 Applebaum, Anne, Gulag: A History of the Soviet Camps, London, 2003 Aron, Robert, Histoire de la libération de la France, juin 1944–mai 1945, Paris, 1959 Association of the Families of the Borderland Settlers, Stalin’s Ethnic Cleansing in Eastern Poland: Tales of the Deported, 1940–1946, London, 2000 Atkinson, Rick, An Army at Dawn: The War in North Africa, 1942–1943, New York, 2003 ——, The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943–1944, New York, 2007 Auden, W.
    [Show full text]