DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Villa Park Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Villa Park Local Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Villa Park Local Hazard Mitigation Plan FEMA Approval Date: XX-XX-XXXX Date of City Council Approval June 22, 2021 Consultant Primary Contact Agency Primary Contact Gary Sturdivan M. Akram Hindiyeh Project Leader City Engineer Engineering Solutions Service, Inc. City of Villa Park (909) 658-5974 (714) 998-1500 [email protected] [email protected] Table of Contents SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Service Area Physical Setting ...........................................................................................2 1.3 History .................................................................................................................................4 1.4 Demographics .....................................................................................................................4 1.5 Population ...........................................................................................................................4 1.6 Existing Land Use ..............................................................................................................4 1.7 Development .......................................................................................................................7 1.8 Infrastructure Overview ...................................................................................................7 1.8.1 Water Distribution System ........................................................................................ 7 1.8.2 Flood Control ............................................................................................................ 8 1.8.3 Sewer System ............................................................................................................ 8 1.8.4 High Pressure Gas Line ............................................................................................ 8 SECTION 2. PLAN ADOPTION ...............................................................................................12 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body ...............................................................................12 2.2 Promulgation Authority ..................................................................................................12 2.3 Primary Point of Contact ................................................................................................12 SECTION 3. PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................13 3.1 Plan Development Process ..............................................................................................13 3.2 The Planning Team ..........................................................................................................15 3.3 Coordination with other Jurisdictions, Agencies and Organizations .........................16 3.4 Public Involvement & Outreach .....................................................................................17 3.5 Assess the Hazards ...........................................................................................................18 3.6 Set Goals ...........................................................................................................................18 3.7 Propose Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................19 3.8 Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ..............................................................................20 3.9 Adopt the Plan ..................................................................................................................20 SECTION 4. RISK ASSESSMENT ...........................................................................................21 4.1 Hazard Identification.......................................................................................................21 4.2 Hazard Screening Criteria ..............................................................................................21 4.3 Hazard Profiles.................................................................................................................23 4.3.1 Earthquakes ............................................................................................................. 23 4.3.2 Wildfires ................................................................................................................. 28 4.3.3 Windstorms ............................................................................................................. 31 4.3.4 Floods ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.3.5 Climate Change/Droughts ....................................................................................... 37 4.3.6 Dam Inundation Zone ............................................................................................. 42 4.4 Inventory Assets Hazard Susceptibility .........................................................................43 4.4.1 Earthquake Vulnerability Analysis ......................................................................... 43 4.4.2 Flooding Vulnerability Analysis ............................................................................. 44 4.4.3 Wildfire Vulnerability Analysis .............................................................................. 44 4.4.4 Climate Change/Drought Vulnerability Analysis ................................................... 45 4.4.5 Long Term Drought Analysis ................................................................................. 45 4.4.6 Windstorm Vulnerability Analysis ......................................................................... 45 SECTION 5. COMMUNITY CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT .................................................47 5.1 Agencies and People .........................................................................................................47 5.2 Existing Plans ...................................................................................................................47 5.3 Regulations, Codes, Policies, and Ordinances ...............................................................47 5.4 Mitigation Programs ........................................................................................................48 5.5 Fiscal Resources ...............................................................................................................48 SECTION 6. MITIGATION STRATEGIES ............................................................................50 6.1 Overview ...........................................................................................................................50 6.2 Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Projects ...................................................................50 6.2.1 Emergency Preparedness ........................................................................................ 50 6.2.2 Earthquakes ............................................................................................................. 51 6.2.3 Wildfires ................................................................................................................. 51 6.2.4 Windstorms ............................................................................................................. 52 6.2.5 Floods ...................................................................................................................... 53 6.2.6 Droughts .................................................................................................................. 53 6.3 Mitigation Priorities.........................................................................................................54 6.4 Implementation Strategy .................................................................................................54 6.5 Mitigation Projects Funding Source ..............................................................................55 6.6 Timeframe ........................................................................................................................55 SECTION 7. PLAN MAINTENANCE ......................................................................................56 7.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the LHMP.......................................................56 7.2 Implementation Through Existing Programs ...............................................................56 7.3 Continued Public Involvement .......................................................................................56 APPENDICES ..............................................................................................................................58 Appendix A: Meeting Matrix ..................................................................................................59 Appendix B: Announcements ..................................................................................................60 Appendix C: Public Comments ...............................................................................................81 List of Tables Table 1. List of Schools in Villa Park ............................................................................................. 5 Table 2. Plans Reviewed by the Planning Team..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • UUSD Finances Discussed by ROB BURGESS the Daily Journal at the Oct
    Clash of unbeaten: Weekend MURDER TRIAL Patriots vs. Colts entertainment Jury to decide competency ...................Page 6 ..............Page 3 ...................................Page 8 INSIDE Mendocino County’s World briefly The Ukiah local newspaper ..........Page 2 Tomorrow: Plenty of sunshine; H 81º L 40º 7 58551 69301 0 THURSDAY Nov. 1, 2007 50 cents tax included DAILY JOURNAL ukiahdailyjournal.com 16 pages, Volume 149 Number 206 email: [email protected] UKIAH MAIN STREET PROGRAM HOSTS DOWNTOWN HALLOWEEN UUSD finances discussed By ROB BURGESS The Daily Journal At the Oct. 24 special meeting of the Ukiah Unified School District board at the district office, Cindy Plank, the district’s fiscal services director, presented the 2006-07 unaudited financial reports to the board. “At this point, the 2006-07 financial reports are considered unaudited,” Plank wrote in a let- ter addressed to Lois Nash, superintendent, and members of the board. “The Board What’s next? of Trustees must review and ap- ▲The Ukiah Unified prove the unaudit- School District has ed financial re- scheduled a special ports before the meeting of the board independent audit for tonight at the dis- can be completed. trict office boardroom Once the audit is at 925 N. State St. The completed, the meeting will begin at draft audit will be 5:30 p.m. with a closed submitted to the session, followed by a district for prelim- public session starting inary review and at 6 p.m. comment.” After a presentation by Plank, the board MacLeod Pappidas/The Daily Journal approved the statement unanimously. Delilah Iversen, 6, and Jacob Smith, 7, dressed in Halloween costumes, also serve as mannequins at Liv Fashion Highlights of the report include: Boutique on School Street Wednesday afternoon during Ukiah Main Street’s Downtown Halloween.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Treatment Effectiveness for Hillslope Stabilization
    United States Department of Agriculture Post-Fire Treatment Forest Service Rocky Mountain Effectiveness for Research Station General Technical Hillslope Stabilization Report RMRS-GTR-240 August 2010 Peter R. Robichaud, Louise E. Ashmun, and Bruce D. Sims A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE Robichaud, Peter R.; Ashmun, Louise E.; Sims, Bruce D. 2010. Post-fire treatment effectiveness for hill- slope stabilization. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-240. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 62 p. Abstract This synthesis of post-fire treatment effectiveness reviews the past decade of research, monitoring, and product development related to post-fire hillslope emergency stabilization treatments, including erosion barri- ers, mulching, chemical soil treatments, and combinations of these treatments. In the past ten years, erosion barrier treatments (contour-felled logs and straw wattles) have declined in use and are now rarely applied as a post-fire hillslope treatment. In contrast, dry mulch treatments (agricultural straw, wood strands, wood shreds, etc.) have quickly gained acceptance as effective, though somewhat expensive, post-fire hillslope stabilization treatments and are frequently recommended when values-at-risk warrant protection. This change has been motivated by research that shows the proportion of exposed mineral soil (or conversely, the propor- tion of ground cover) to be the primary treatment factor controlling post-fire hillslope erosion. Erosion barrier treatments provide little ground cover and have been shown to be less effective than mulch, especially during short-duration, high intensity rainfall events. In addition, innovative options for producing and applying mulch materials have adapted these materials for use on large burned areas that are inaccessible by road.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigation Plan for City of Yucaipa
    Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Hazard Mitigation Plan Update FEMA Approval Date: 02-26-2021 Date of District Board Approval 03-09-2021 Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review Sturdivan 2021 Primary Contact During Development Sturdivan Emergency Management Consulting Gary Sturdivan 909-658-5974 [email protected] Agency Primary Contact: John Wrobel Yucaipa Valley Water District (909)-790-7597 [email protected] Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review Sturdivan 2021 Table of Contents SECTION 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1.0 Purpose of the Plan. .................................................................................................... 1.1 Community Profile. ..................................................................................................... 1.1.1 Physical Setting. .......................................................................................................... 1.1.2 History ........................................................................................................................ 1.1.3 Demographics.............................................................................................................. 1.1.4 Population. .................................................................................................................. 1.1.5 Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Springs Water District Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mission Springs Water District Local Hazard Mitigation Plan CalOES Approval Date: XX-XX-XXXX FEMA Approval Date: XX-XX-XXXX Date of District Board Approval XX-XX-XXXX Mission Springs Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Primary Contact During Development Sturdivan Emergency Management Consulting Gary Sturdivan Mobile: (909)658-5974 Email: [email protected] Agency Primary Contact: Bassam Alzammar Mission Springs Water District Phone: (760)660-4943 Email: [email protected] Mission Springs Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Table of Contents SECTION 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………... 1.0 Purpose of the Plan………………………………………………………………… 1.1 Authority…………………………………………………………………………… 1.2 Community Profile…………………………………………………………………. 1.3 Physical Setting……………………………………………………………………. 1.4 Demographics……………………………………………………………………… 1.5 Existing Land Use…………………………………………………………………. 1.6 Development Trends………………………………………………………………. SECTION 2. Plan Adoption…………………………………………………………………... 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body ........................................................................... 2.2 Promulgation Authority .............................................................................................. 2.3 Primary Point of Contact ............................................................................................. SECTION 3. Planning Process……………………………………………………………...... 3.1 Preparing for the Plan ................................................................................................. 3.2 Planning Team ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serrano Water District Notice of Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Rate Increases and Adjustments to the Rates for Water Service Charges
    SERRANO WATER DISTRICT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED RATE INCREASES AND ADJUSTMENTS TO THE RATES FOR WATER SERVICE CHARGES The Serrano Water District (SWD or District) will conduct a public hearing on June 15, 2021 at 8:30 AM, or as soon thereafter as practicable, in the Board Room of the District's administrative office, located at 18021 Lincoln Street, Villa Park, California 92861, to consider adopting increases in and adjustments to the volumetric (usage) rates and service (fixed) charges for water service, including annual cost of living adjustments and pass-throughs of water supply costs imposed on the District. In response to the Governor’s Executive Orders regarding COVID-19, some Board Members may be participating in this meeting via teleconference from remote locations. The Public may participate in the board meeting, and this public hearing, in person at the Serrano Water District Board Room subject to social distancing requirements established in the Executive Order or by participating by teleconference by visiting www.serranowater.org for login or call information. Persons desiring to participate in the public hearing in person at the District are asked to notify SWD Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours prior to the public hearing on June 15 in order to ensure that all required social distancing requirements can be observed during the public hearing and the June 2021 SWD Regular Board meeting. I. INTRODUCTION AND REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED RATE INCREASE The principal reason for the proposed rate increases is the need to pay for costly improvements to aging water storage and supply facilities owned by SWD, which must be replaced or rehabilitated so the District can continue to supply safe and reliable potable water to its customers at a reasonable cost.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR
    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA START TIME Duration min:sec Public Affairs Issue 1 Public Affairs Issue 2 Show & Narrative 1/2/2017 TAKE TWO: The Binge– 2016 was a terrible year - except for all the awesome new content that was Entertainment Industry available to stream. Mark Jordan Legan goes through the best that 2016 had to 9:42 8:30 offer with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: The Ride 2017– 2017 is here and our motor critic, Sue Carpenter, Transportation puts on her prognosticator hat to predict some of the automotive stories we'll be talking about in the new year 9:51 6:00 with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Presidents and the Press– Presidential historian Barbara Perry says contention between a President Politics Media and the news media is nothing new. She talks with Alex Cohen about her advice for journalists covering the 10:07 10:30 Trump White House. TAKE TWO: The Wall– Political scientist Peter Andreas says building Trump's Immigration Politics wall might be easier than one thinks because hundreds of miles of the border are already lined with barriers. 10:18 12:30 He joins Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Prison Podcast– A podcast Law & is being produced out of San Quentin Media Order/Courts/Police State Prison called Ear Hustle. We hear some excerpts and A Martinez talks to 10:22 9:30 one of the producers, Nigel Poor. TAKE TWO: The Distance Between Us– Reyna Grande grew up in poverty in Books/ Literature/ Iguala, Mexico, left behind by her Immigration Authors parents who had gone north looking for a better life and she's written a memoir for young readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Irvine Ranch Water District / Serrano Water District Committee Meeting Wednesday, April 15, 2020
    AGENDA IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT / SERRANO WATER DISTRICT COMMITTEE MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2020 Due to COVID-19, this meeting will be conducted as a teleconference pursuant to the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, which suspend certain requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. Members of the public may not attend this meeting in person. Participation by members of the Committee will be from remote locations. Public access and participation will only be available telephonically/electronically. To virtually attend the meeting and to be able to view any presentations or additional materials provided at the meeting, please join online via Webex using the link and information below: Via WebEx: https://irwd.my.webex.com/irwd.my/j.php?MTID=mf620c7198cd10dc9081c133274776ff4 Meeting Number: 624 399 302 Password: frU7XHFi23U After joining the meeting, in order to ensure all persons can participate and observe the meeting, please select the “Call in” option and use a telephone to access the audio for the meeting by using the call-in information provided. As a courtesy to the other participants, please mute your phone when you are not speaking. PLEASE NOTE: Participants joining the meeting will be placed into the WebEx lobby when the Committee enters closed session. Participants who remain in the “lobby” will automatically be returned to the open session of the Committee once the closed session has concluded. Participants who join the meeting while the Committee is in closed session will receive a notice that the meeting has been locked. They will be able to join the meeting once the closed session has concluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Education
    SCHOOI:,"DISTRICT ' ' THE ORANGE UNIFIED �%-, BOARD OF EDUCATION ... WELCOMES APPRECIATES YOUAND IN OUSD SCHOOLS YOUR INTEREST The Board of Education cordially invites you Board meetings and ptke active role in the educational affairs to attend to: of your community. The decisions of elected �ffjdals a ect your child's future, the well-being of the yourweffar� of'l5t.fi: coun��ff ygur' child, community and, to a greater extent, the an Board of Education/Superintendent Rick Ledesma, • John Ortega, • Mark Wayland, President Vice President Clerk Alexia Deligianni, Ed.D., • Kathryn Moffat, • Kimberlee Nichols, • Melissa Smith, Member Member Member Member Renae E. Dreier, Ed.D., Superintendent Mission Statement "The Orange Unified School District, being committed to planning for continual improvement, will offer a learning environment of excellence, with high expectations, to provide each student with the opportunity to be able to compete in the global economy." Board Meetings Regula� Board meetings are typically scheduled the second and fourth Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Orange Unified School District Education Center, 1401 North Handy Street, Building H. The purpose of the Board meeting is to conduct business. This is done in Open Session. Matters dealing with students and employees are reserved for Closed Session to provide confidentiality as required by law. Other Closed Session topics include: pending litigation, property negotiations and collective bargaining issues with employee associations. Special Board Meetings Meeting notices for special meetings are posted 24 hours in advance of the meeting and shall indicate the business to be transacted at the meeting. No other business shall be considered at the special meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliso Niguel High School 28000 Wolverine Way Aliso Viejo, CA
    Aliso Niguel High School Estancia High School 28000 Wolverine Way 2323 Placentia Ave. Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949) 831-5590 (949) 515-6506 https://anhs-capousd-ca.schoolloop.com/ | http://estancia.nmusd.us | Google Maps Google Maps Fountain Valley High School Boysen Park 17816 Bushard St. 951 S. State College Blvd. Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Anaheim, CA 92805 (714) 962-3301 Google Maps http://www.fvhs.com | Google Maps Brea Olinda High School Glover Stadium, La Palma Park 789 Wildcat Way 1125 N. La Palma Pkwy Brea, CA 92821 Anaheim, CA 92801 (714) 990-7850 Google Maps http://bohs-bousd- ca.schoolloop.com/ | Google Maps Hart Park (OLU Baseball Field) 701 S. Glassell Brookhurst Park Orange, CA 92866 2271 West Crescent Street Google Maps Anaheim, CA 92801 Google Maps Irvine High School 4321 Walnut Ave Canyon High School Irvine, CA 92604 220 S. Imperial Hwy. (949) 936-7000 Anaheim, CA 92807 http://www.irvinehigh.org | Google Maps (714) 391-6751 http://www.canyonhighschool.org/ | Google JSerra Catholic High School Maps 26351 Junipero Serra Road San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Capo Valley High School (949) 493-9038 26301 Via Escolar http://www.jserra.org | Google Maps Mission Viejo, CA 92692 (949) 364-6100 Kennedy High School http://www.cvhs.com | Google Maps 8281 Walker St. LaPalma, CA 90623 El Modena Park (714) 220-4101 555 S. Hewes St. http://www.kennedyhs.org | Google Maps Orange, CA 92869 Google Maps Lakewood High School 4400 Briercrest Ave El Toro High School Lakewood, CA 25255 Toledo Way http://www.lblakewood.schoolloop.com | El Toro, CA 92630 Google Maps (949) 586-6333 https://www.saddlespace.org/ETHS/eths/cms_ La Quinta High School page/view | Google Maps 79255 Blackhawk Way (Westward Ho Drive) La Quinta, CA 92253 San Juan Hills High School (760) 772-4150 29211 Vista Montana www.dsusd.k12.ca.us/schools/LQHS/ | Google San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Maps (949) 234-5900 http://sjhhs.schoolloop.com | Google Maps Marina High School 15871 Springdale Street Santa Ana College (field is at College Ave/W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT CHIEF’S MESSAGE January 2, 2021 It is our pleasure to present our 2020 Annual Report to the community. We are proud to report our challenges and accomplishments to you in this very unique year. At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, your Montecito Fire Department set a goal to maintain our ability to provide exceptional emergency service to our community despite the challenges presented by the global health crisis. Thanks to the commitment and dedication of every member of the organization, we achieved that goal. The organization suffered no staffing or service issues which enabled us to continue to serve this great community. We also strived to support the community in whatever way possible as residents, businesses, and visitors faced challenges presented by the pandemic. As I write this message, two vaccines are nearing emergency approval and we anxiously await the opportunity for our entire community to be vaccinated. We continue to collaborate with neighboring fire departments, community service organizations, and other local government entities. These partnerships provide the foundation to effectively address community issues together to the benefit of all. In 2020, the Fire District collaborated with the Montecito Association on an outreach project called Hands Across Montecito. This program helps connect homeless people to resources and find permanent housing solutions. Additionally, the Fire Chiefs Association of Santa Barbara County established a public safety task force to identify solutions to parking issues that impede emergency vehicle access and community member egress. The task force is also addressing how to mitigate homeless encampment fires and illegal dispersed camping.
    [Show full text]