DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary and Abstracts of the Planetary Data Workshop, June 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary and Abstracts of the Planetary Data Workshop, June 2012 Summary and Abstracts of the Planetary Data Workshop, June 2012 By Lisa R. Gaddis, Trent Hare, and Ross Beyer Open-File Report 2014–1056 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Gaddis, L.R., Hare, T., and Beyer, R., 2014, Summary and abstracts of the Planetary Data Workshop, June 2012: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1056, 199 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141056. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. The abstracts by non-U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) authors in this volume are published as they were submitted. Abstracts authored entirely by non-USGS authors do not represent the views or position of the USGS or the U.S. Government and are published solely as part of the Proceedings volume. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) ii Contents Prefatory Note ................................................................................................................................................................ v Organizing Committee ................................................................................................................................................ v Sponsors ..................................................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Outcomes and Observations for the Future ................................................................................................................... 4 Reference Cited ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 List of Abstracts ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Abstracts with Oral or Poster Presentations (Presenter in Bold) ..................................................................... 7 List of Print-Only Abstracts (No Presentation) ...........................................................................................................11 List of Presentations or Posters Only (No Abstract) ..................................................................................................12 List of Demonstrations (On-Site Only).......................................................................................................................13 Abstracts .......................................................................................................................................................................15 Figures Figure 1. Approximate volume of data held by the NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) in the period from 2001 projected to 2015 (Gaddis and others, 2012). ............................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2. Overview of the agenda for the Planetary Data Workshop. ........................................................................ 2 iii Conversion Factors Multiply By To obtain inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter (cm) inch (in.) 25.4 millimeter (mm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) mile, nautical (nmi) 1.852 kilometer (km) yard (yd) 0.9144 meter (m) iv Prefatory Note Planetary Data: A Workshop for Users and Software Developers A meeting for users and developers held at the DuBois Conference Center on the Campus of Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff Arizona, June 25 to 29, 2012 Organizing Committee Lisa Gaddis U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona Trent Hare U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona Ross Beyer NASA Ames Research Center and SETI Institute, Mountain View, California Ed Guinness Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Justin Hagerty U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona Wes Patterson Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland Sponsors NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) PDS Imaging Node PDS Geosciences Node NASA Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program NASA Regional Planetary Image Facility Network U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona Acknowledgments The meeting organizing committee would like to extend our thanks to these people for their support: Dr. Buck Sanford, Northern Arizona University (NAU) Department of Geology (facilities support); Angel Garlant, student, NAU Department of Physics and Astronomy (abstract compilation); William Knopf, Edmund Grayzeck, Tom Morgan (NASA headquarters, Planetary Data System); Dr. Michael S. Kelley (NASA headquarters, Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program). v Summary and Abstracts of the Planetary Data Workshop, June 2012 By Lisa R. Gaddis,1 Trent Hare,1 and Ross Beyer2 Introduction The recent boom in the volume of digital data returned by international planetary science missions continues to both delight and confound users of those data. In just the past decade, the Planetary Data System (PDS), NASA’s official archive of scientific results from U.S. planetary missions, has seen a nearly 50-fold increase in the amount of data and now serves nearly half a petabyte. In only a handful of years, this volume is expected to approach 1 petabyte (1,000 terabytes or 1 quadrillion bytes; fig. 1). Although data providers, archivists, users, and developers have done a creditable job of providing search functions, download capabilities, and analysis and visualization tools, the new wealth of data necessitates more frequent and extensive discussion among users and developers about their current capabilities and their needs for improved and new tools. Figure 1. Approximate volume of data held by the NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) in the period from 2001 projected to 2015 (Gaddis and others, 2012). A workshop to address these and other topics, “Planetary Data: A Workshop for Users and Planetary Software Developers,” was held June 25–29, 2012, at Northern Arizona University (NAU) in Flagstaff, Arizona. A goal of the workshop was to present a summary of currently available tools, along 1 U.S. Geological Survey Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona. 2 NASA Ames Research Center and SETI Institute, Mountain View, California. 1 with hands-on training and how-to guides, for acquiring, processing and working with a variety of digital planetary data. The meeting emphasized presentations by data users and mission providers during days 1 and 2, and developers had the floor on days 4 and 5 using an “unconference” format for day 5 (fig. 2). Day 3 featured keynote talks by Laurence Soderblom (U.S. Geological Survey, USGS) and Dan Crichton (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL) followed by a panel discussion, and then research and technical discussions about tools and capabilities under recent or current development. Software and tool demonstrations were held in break-out sessions in parallel with the oral session. Nearly 150 data users and developers from across the globe attended, and 22 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and non-NASA data providers and missions were represented. Presentations (some in video format) and tutorials are posted on the meeting site (http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/groups/Planetary-Data-Workshop). Figure 2. Overview of the agenda for the Planetary Data Workshop. 2 Summary To facilitate planetary research, a wide variety of techniques are used across the planetary science and related communities to solve issues related to data access, calibration, cartographic processing, cross-correlation, and the creation of derived, typically more usable, scientific products. Such products can help scientists to portray characteristics such as surface or feature morphology, topography, and unit distribution and composition but tend to be even more valuable by bringing the observations into a common spatial and visualization system. Topics for the Planetary Data Workshop ranged from discussions of digital in-situ and orbital data integration, data processing methods, software development, data interoperability, visualization and analysis of multilayer data,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind-Eroded Stratigraphy on the Floor of a Noachian Impact Crater, Noachis Terra, Mars
    Third Conference on Early Mars (2012) 7066.pdf WIND-ERODED STRATIGRAPHY ON THE FLOOR OF A NOACHIAN IMPACT CRATER, NOACHIS TERRA, MARS. R. P. Irwin III1,2, J. J. Wray3, T. A. Maxwell1, S. C. Mest2,4, and S. T. Hansen3, 1Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, MRC 315, 6th St. at Independence Ave. SW, Washington DC 20013, [email protected], [email protected]. 2Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Fort Lowell, Suite 106, Tucson AZ 85719, [email protected]. 3School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta GA 30332-0340, [email protected], [email protected]. 4Planetary Geodynamics Laboratory, Code 698, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771. Introduction: Detailed stratigraphic and spectral cular 12-km depression (a possible highly degraded studies of outcrops exposed in craters and other basins crater) on the southern side. The former received in- have significantly advanced the understanding of early ternal drainage from the north and east, whereas part Mars. Most studies have focused on high-relief sec- of the southern wall drained to the latter (Fig. 2). tions exposed by aeolian deflation, such as those in Gale crater, Arabia Terra, and Valles Marineris [1–3]. Many flat-floored Noachian degraded craters also have wind-eroded strata, suggesting that they lack a cap rock of Gusev-type basalts [4,5]. This study focuses on the youngest materials exposed on the wind-eroded floor of an unnamed Noachian degraded crater in Noachis Terra, Mars. The crater is centered at 20.2ºS, 42.6ºE and is 52 km in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Chapter 6 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Jim Taylor, Dennis K. Lee, and Shervin Shambayati 6.1 Mission Overview The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) [1, 2] has a suite of instruments making observations at Mars, and it provides data-relay services for Mars landers and rovers. MRO was launched on August 12, 2005. The orbiter successfully went into orbit around Mars on March 10, 2006 and began reducing its orbit altitude and circularizing the orbit in preparation for the science mission. The orbit changing was accomplished through a process called aerobraking, in preparation for the “science mission” starting in November 2006, followed by the “relay mission” starting in November 2008. MRO participated in the Mars Science Laboratory touchdown and surface mission that began in August 2012 (Chapter 7). MRO communications has operated in three different frequency bands: 1) Most telecom in both directions has been with the Deep Space Network (DSN) at X-band (~8 GHz), and this band will continue to provide operational commanding, telemetry transmission, and radiometric tracking. 2) During cruise, the functional characteristics of a separate Ka-band (~32 GHz) downlink system were verified in preparation for an operational demonstration during orbit operations. After a Ka-band hardware anomaly in cruise, the project has elected not to initiate the originally planned operational demonstration (with yet-to-be­ used redundant Ka-band hardware). 201 202 Chapter 6 3) A new-generation ultra-high frequency (UHF) (~400 MHz) system was verified with the Mars Exploration Rovers in preparation for the successful relay communications with the Phoenix lander in 2008 and the later Mars Science Laboratory relay operations.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 13, EGU2011-5107-2, 2011 EGU General Assembly 2011 © Author(s) 2011 NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Richard Elphic (1), Gregory Delory (1,2), Anthony Colaprete (1), Mihaly Horanyi (3), Paul Mahaffy (4), Butler Hine (1), Steven McClard (5), Joan Salute (6), Edwin Grayzeck (6), and Don Boroson (7) (1) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA USA ([email protected]), (2) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA, (3) Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA, (4) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD USA, (5) LunarQuest Program Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL USA, (6) Planetary Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA, Washington, DC USA, (7) Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington MA USA Nearly 40 years have passed since the last Apollo missions investigated the mysteries of the lunar atmosphere and the question of levitated lunar dust. The most important questions remain: what is the composition, structure and variability of the tenuous lunar exosphere? What are its origins, transport mechanisms, and loss processes? Is lofted lunar dust the cause of the horizon glow observed by the Surveyor missions and Apollo astronauts? How does such levitated dust arise and move, what is its density, and what is its ultimate fate? The US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council decadal surveys and the recent “Scientific Context for Exploration of the Moon” (SCEM) reports have identified studies of the pristine state of the lunar atmosphere and dust environment as among the leading priorities for future lunar science missions.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • MARS an Overview of the 1985–2006 Mars Orbiter Camera Science
    MARS MARS INFORMATICS The International Journal of Mars Science and Exploration Open Access Journals Science An overview of the 1985–2006 Mars Orbiter Camera science investigation Michael C. Malin1, Kenneth S. Edgett1, Bruce A. Cantor1, Michael A. Caplinger1, G. Edward Danielson2, Elsa H. Jensen1, Michael A. Ravine1, Jennifer L. Sandoval1, and Kimberley D. Supulver1 1Malin Space Science Systems, P.O. Box 910148, San Diego, CA, 92191-0148, USA; 2Deceased, 10 December 2005 Citation: Mars 5, 1-60, 2010; doi:10.1555/mars.2010.0001 History: Submitted: August 5, 2009; Reviewed: October 18, 2009; Accepted: November 15, 2009; Published: January 6, 2010 Editor: Jeffrey B. Plescia, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University Reviewers: Jeffrey B. Plescia, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University; R. Aileen Yingst, University of Wisconsin Green Bay Open Access: Copyright 2010 Malin Space Science Systems. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: NASA selected the Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) investigation in 1986 for the Mars Observer mission. The MOC consisted of three elements which shared a common package: a narrow angle camera designed to obtain images with a spatial resolution as high as 1.4 m per pixel from orbit, and two wide angle cameras (one with a red filter, the other blue) for daily global imaging to observe meteorological events, geodesy, and provide context for the narrow angle images. Following the loss of Mars Observer in August 1993, a second MOC was built from flight spare hardware and launched aboard Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) in November 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond
    Reproducible Master PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond GRADE 4 – 5 OBJECTIVES PAGE 1 Students will: ö Read Snoopy, First Beagle on the Moon! and Shoot for the Moon, Snoopy! ö Learn facts about the Apollo Moon missions. ö Use this information to complete a fill-in-the-blank fact worksheet. ö Create mission objectives for a brand new mission to the moon. SUGGESTED GRADE LEVELS 4 – 5 SUBJECT AREAS Space Science, History TIMELINE 30 – 45 minutes NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS ö 5-ESS1 ESS1.B Earth and the Solar System ö 3-5-ETS1 ETS1.B Developing Possible Solutions 21st CENTURY ESSENTIAL SKILLS Collaboration and Teamwork, Communication, Information Literacy, Flexibility, Leadership, Initiative, Organizing Concepts, Obtaining/Evaluating/Communicating Ideas BACKGROUND ö According to NASA.gov, NASA has proudly shared an association with Charles M. Schulz and his American icon Snoopy since Apollo missions began in the 1960s. Schulz created comic strips depicting Snoopy on the Moon, capturing public excitement about America’s achievements in space. In May 1969, Apollo 10 astronauts traveled to the Moon for a final trial run before the lunar landings took place on later missions. Because that mission required the lunar module to skim within 50,000 feet of the Moon’s surface and “snoop around” to determine the landing site for Apollo 11, the crew named the lunar module Snoopy. The command module was named Charlie Brown, after Snoopy’s loyal owner. These books are a united effort between Peanuts Worldwide, NASA and Simon & Schuster to generate interest in space among today’s younger children.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Geology Tools Used During the Apollo Lunar Program and Their Suitability for Future Missions to the Om on Lindsay Kathleen Anderson
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2016 A Comparative Analysis Of The Geology Tools Used During The Apollo Lunar Program And Their Suitability For Future Missions To The oM on Lindsay Kathleen Anderson Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Anderson, Lindsay Kathleen, "A Comparative Analysis Of The Geology Tools Used During The Apollo Lunar Program And Their Suitability For Future Missions To The oonM " (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1860. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1860 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE GEOLOGY TOOLS USED DURING THE APOLLO LUNAR PROGRAM AND THEIR SUITABILITY FOR FUTURE MISSIONS TO THE MOON by Lindsay Kathleen Anderson Bachelor of Science, University of North Dakota, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2016 Copyright 2016 Lindsay Anderson ii iii PERMISSION Title A Comparative Analysis of the Geology Tools Used During the Apollo Lunar Program and Their Suitability for Future Missions to the Moon Department Space Studies Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 14 Press
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WO 2-4155 WASHINGT0N.D.C. 20546 lELS.wo 36925 RELEASE NO: 71-3K FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY A. M . January 21, 1971 P R E S S K I T -more - 1/11/71 2 -0- NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (m2) 962-4155 N E w s WASHINGTON,D.C. 20546 mu: (202) 963-6925 FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY A..M. January 21:, 1971 RELEASE NO: 71-3 APOLLO 14 LAUNCH JAN. 31 Apollo 14, the sixth United States manned flight to the Moon and fourth Apollo mission with an objective of landing men on the Moon, is scheduled for launch Jan. 31 at 3:23 p.m. EST from Kennedy Space Center, Fla. The Apollo 14 lunar module is to land in the hilly upland region north of the Fra Mauro crater for a stay of about 33 hours, during whick, the landing crew will leave the spacecraft twice to set up scientific experiments on the lunar surface and to continue geological explorations. The two earlier Apollo lunar landings were Apollo 11 at Tranquillity Base and Apollo 12 at Surveyor 3 crater in the Ocean of Storms. Apollo 14 prime crewmen are Spacecraft Commander Alan B. Shepard, Jr., Command Module Pilot Stuart A. Roosa, and Lunar Module Pilot Edgar I). Mitchell. Shepard is a Navy car-sain Roosa an Air Force major and Mitchell a Navy commander. -more- 1/8/71 -2- Lunar materials brought- back from the Fra Mauro formation are expected to yield information on the early history of the Moon, the Earth and the solar system--perhaps as long ago as five billion years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mro High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (Hirise)
    Sixth International Conference on Mars (2003) 3287.pdf MROHIGHRESOLUTIONIMAGINGSCIENCEEXPERIMENT(HIRISE): INSTRUMENTDEVELOPMENT.AlanDelamere,IraBecker,JimBergstrom,JonBurkepile,Joe Day,DavidDorn,DennisGallagher,CharlieHamp,JeffreyLasco,BillMeiers,AndrewSievers,Scott StreetmanStevenTarr,MarkTommeraasen,PaulVolmer.BallAerospaceandTechnologyCorp.,PO Box1062,Boulder,CO80306 Focus Introduction:Theprimaryfunctionalre- Mechanism PrimaryMirror quirementoftheHiRISEimager,figure1isto PrimaryMirrorBaffle 2nd Fold allowidentificationofbothpredictedandun- Mirror knownfeaturesonthesurfaceofMarstoa muchfinerresolutionandcontrastthanprevi- ouslypossible[1],[2].Thisresultsinacam- 1st Fold erawithaverywideswathwidth,6kmat Mirror 300kmaltitude,andahighsignaltonoise ratio,>100:1.Generationofterrainmaps,30 Filters cmverticalresolution,fromstereoimages Focal requiresveryaccurategeometriccalibration. Plane Theprojectlimitationsofmass,costand schedulemakethedevelopmentchallenging. FocalPlane SecondaryMirror Inaddition,thespacecraftstability[3]must Electronics TertiaryMirror SecondaryMirrorBaffle notbeamajorlimitationtoimagequality. Thenominalorbitforthesciencephaseofthe missionisa3pmorbitof255by320kmwith Figure1Cameraopticalpathoptimizedforlowmass periapsislockedtothesouthpole.Thetrack Integration(TDI)tocreateveryhigh(100:1)signalnoise velocityisapproximately3,400m/s. ratioimages. HiRISEFeatures:TheHiRISEinstrumentperformance Theimagerdesignisanall-reflectivethreemirrorastig- goalsarelistedinTable1.Thedesignfeaturesa50cm matictelescopewithlight-weightedZeroduropticsanda
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell
    Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell “One small step for…” Though no American has stepped onto the surface of the moon since 1972, the exiting of the Earth’s atmosphere today is almost commonplace. Once covered live over all TV and radio networks, increasingly US space launches have been relegated to a fleeting mention on the nightly news, if mentioned at all. But there was a time when leaving the planet got the full attention it deserved. Certainly it did in July of 1969 when an American man, Neil Armstrong, became the first human being to ever step foot on the moon’s surface. The pictures he took and the reports he sent back to Earth stopped the world in its tracks, especially his eloquent opening salvo which became as famous and as known to most citizens as any words ever spoken. The mid-1969 mission of NASA’s Apollo 11 mission became the defining moment of the US- USSR “Space Race” usually dated as the period between 1957 and 1975 when the world’s two superpowers were competing to top each other in technological advances and scientific knowledge (and bragging rights) related to, truly, the “final frontier.” There were three astronauts on the Apollo 11 spacecraft, the US’s fifth manned spaced mission, and the third lunar mission of the Apollo program. They were: Neil Armstrong, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, and Michael Collins. The trio was launched from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 16, 1969 at 1:32pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Mineral Stability Under Venus Conditions: a Focus on the Venus Radar Anomalies Erika Kohler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2016 Investigating Mineral Stability under Venus Conditions: A Focus on the Venus Radar Anomalies Erika Kohler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Mineral Physics Commons, and the The unS and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Kohler, Erika, "Investigating Mineral Stability under Venus Conditions: A Focus on the Venus Radar Anomalies" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1473. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1473 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Investigating Mineral Stability under Venus Conditions: A Focus on the Venus Radar Anomalies A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Space and Planetary Sciences by Erika Kohler University of Oklahoma Bachelors of Science in Meteorology, 2010 May 2016 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________ Dr. Claud H. Sandberg Lacy Dissertation Director Committee Co-Chair ____________________________ ___________________________ Dr. Vincent Chevrier Dr. Larry Roe Committee Co-chair Committee Member ____________________________ ___________________________ Dr. John Dixon Dr. Richard Ulrich Committee Member Committee Member Abstract Radar studies of the surface of Venus have identified regions with high radar reflectivity concentrated in the Venusian highlands: between 2.5 and 4.75 km above a planetary radius of 6051 km, though it varies with latitude.
    [Show full text]