Direct and Indirect Ecological Consequences of Human

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Direct and Indirect Ecological Consequences of Human Direct and Indirect Ecological Consequences of Human Activities in Urban and Native Ecosystems by Elizabeth Miessner Cook A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved June 2014 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Sharon J. Hall (Chair) Christopher G. Boone Scott L. Collins Nancy B. Grimm ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY August 2014 ABSTRACT Though cities occupy only a small percentage of Earth’s terrestrial surface, humans concentrated in urban areas impact ecosystems at local, regional and global scales. I examined the direct and indirect ecological outcomes of human activities on both managed landscapes and protected native ecosystems in and around cities. First, I used highly managed residential yards, which compose nearly half of the heterogeneous urban land area, as a model system to examine the ecological effects of people’s management choices and the social drivers of those decisions. I found that a complex set of individual and institutional social characteristics drives people’s decisions, which in turn affect ecological structure and function across scales from yards to cities. This work demonstrates the link between individuals’ decision-making and ecosystem service provisioning in highly managed urban ecosystems. Second, I examined the distribution of urban-generated air pollutants and their complex ecological outcomes in protected native ecosystems. Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), reactive nitrogen (N), and ozone (O3) are elevated near human activities and act as both resources and stressors to primary producers, but little is known about their co-occurring distribution or combined impacts on ecosystems. I investigated the urban “ecological airshed,” including the spatial and temporal extent of N deposition, as well as CO2 and O3 concentrations in native preserves in Phoenix, Arizona and the outlying Sonoran Desert. I found elevated concentrations of ecologically relevant pollutants co-occur in both urban and remote native lands at levels that are likely to affect ecosystem structure and function. Finally, I tested the combined effects of CO2, N, and i O3 on the dominant native and non-native herbaceous desert species in a multi-factor dose-response greenhouse experiment. Under current and predicted future air quality conditions, the non-native species (Schismus arabicus) had net positive growth despite physiological stress under high O3 concentrations. In contrast, the native species (Pectocarya recurvata) was more sensitive to O3 and, unlike the non-native species, did not benefit from the protective role of CO2. These results highlight the vulnerability of native ecosystems to current and future air pollution over the long term. Together, my research provides empirical evidence for future policies addressing multiple stressors in urban managed and native landscapes. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Foremost, I would like to thank Sharon Hall for her endless support, training, and guidance toward becoming a scientist and broad critical thinker. Thank you! I also thank my committee, Christopher Boone, Scott Collins, and Nancy Grimm, for your encouragement and support in pursing an interdisciplinary graduate education and my research goals, as well as for your helpful feedback improving this research. Thank you to the many members of the IGERT in Urban Ecology community, the School of Life Sciences graduate group and especially past and current Hall lab members, the many Grimm Lab reading groups, and the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-term Ecological Research network. Most especially, thank you to Stevan Earl, Rebecca Hale, David Huber, David Iwaniec, Kelli Larson, Jennifer Learned, Yevgeniy Marusenko, Pamela Padgett, and Katelyn Parady. Thank you for many thoughtful, engaging, and inspiring conversations and collaborations that have shaped my perspective on science and research. I am lucky to have been a part of these collaborative and engaging communities. To my family and parents, thank you for teaching (and reminding) me that there are no limits to one’s dreams or capabilities and for supporting me in my many endeavors – that is the greatest gift. Finally, thank you to my love, Lyzzette Foz Bullock, for your innumerable measures of support and for your unwavering belief in me. I could not have done this without you. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ... ........................................................................................ ........ 1 Scope and Structure of this Dissertation .................................................................. 2 References ................................................................................................................ 7 2 RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPES AS SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS: SYNTHESIS OF MULTI-SCALAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PEOPLE AND THEIR HOME ENVIRONMENT ... .................................................... ........ 9 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................. 13 Findings .................................................................................................................. 15 Ecology of Residential Landscapes .............................................................. 16 Management Decisions ................................................................................. 29 Multi-Scalar Human Drivers of Residential Landscapes ............................. 32 Legacy Effects .............................................................................................. 42 Discussion and Future Research Directions .......................................................... 44 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 49 Acknolwedgements ................................................................................................ 51 References .............................................................................................................. 52 iv CHAPTER Page 3 ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN DEPOSITION IN A LARGE SEMI-ARID CITY IS LOWER THAN EXPECTED: FINDINGS FROM A METHODS COMPARISON ........................................................................................................ 80 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 80 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 82 Methods .................................................................................................................. 87 Site Characteristics ....................................................................................... 87 Long-Term N Deposition Monitoring .......................................................... 88 Estimating Dry Deposition with Multiple Sampling Approaches ............... 91 Meteorological and Urban Site Characteristics ............................................ 96 Data Analyses ............................................................................................... 98 Results ................................................................................................................... 99 Long-Term N Deposition ............................................................................. 99 Gaseous N Concentrations and Dry Deposition ......................................... 104 Total N Deposition Comparison ................................................................. 106 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 108 Patterns of Nitrogen Deposition in a Large Semi-Arid City and Surrounding Native Ecosystem ..................................................................................... 108 Drivers and Sources of Nitrogen Deposition in an Arid Metropolitan Region ......................................................................................................... 112 Underestimation of N Deposition in Arid Systems ................................... 116 Uncertainties in Urban Arid N Deposition Estimates ................................ 117 v CHAPTER Page Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 120 Acknolwedgements .............................................................................................. 122 References ............................................................................................................ 123 4 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE “ECOLOGICAL AIRSHED” OF NEAR- URBAN PROTECTED ECOSYSTEMS ............................................................. 145 Abstract ................................................................................................................ 145 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 147 Methods ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    DR. EVELYN E. GAISER George M. Barley, Jr. Endowed Chair, Institute of Environment Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-6145 (phone), 305-348-4096 (fax), [email protected] EDUCATION 1997 Ph.D. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, Institute of Ecology 1991 M.S. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, Department of Animal Ecology 1989 B.S. Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, Department of Biology ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS 2018-present George M. Barley, Jr. Endowed Chair of Everglades Research, Institute of Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 2014 – 2018 Executive Director, School of Environment, Arts and Society and Associate Dean, College of Arts, Sciences and Education, Florida International University, Miami, FL 2012-present Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 2006-2012 Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 2008-present Research Associate, Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, FL 2001- 2006 Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 1997-2001 Assistant Research Scientist, Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, Miami, FL 1991-1997 Research/Teaching Assistant, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA and Savannah River Ecology Lab, Aiken, SC 1989-1991 Research/Teaching Assistant, Department of Animal Ecology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA and Iowa Lakeside Laboratory, Milford, IA 1987-1988 Research Technician, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE AT FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY 2014 – 2018 Executive Director, School of Environment, Arts and Society and Associate Dean, College of Arts, Sciences and Education. I served as the academic leader of one of three schools in the College of Arts, Sciences and Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Researchers Detail Climate-Change Impacts in Ecological Journal 5 November 2013
    Researchers detail climate-change impacts in ecological journal 5 November 2013 also senior author of two of the papers. To produce this special issue of ESA's Frontiers, a diverse group of over 50 ecological scientists and other stakeholders condensed and illustrated the work they had done for a technical input report on biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services for the U.S. National Climate Assessment. The assessment is due to be released in 2014. The collection is aimed at both ecologists and practitioners. The authors hope to demonstrate the potential for researchers to collaborate with practitioners in identifying "policy relevant questions" – information that practitioners need to Climate change is already increasing the frequency of make science-based decisions about management extreme events, such as storms, which directly affect of natural resources. Grimm would like to see more people in numerous ways. Credit: City of Scottsdale academic researchers designing "policy-relevant (with permission) questions" into their research programs so that research projects may address the data needs of managers while tackling basic science questions. The coming century will bring many changes for The authors designed the collection of reports to natural systems and for the human societies that demonstrate the interrelationships of human and depend on them, as changing climate conditions ecosystem productivity, as well as the ripple outward to changing rainfall patterns, soil interrelationships of species, climate and nutrient cycles, species ranges, seasonal timing landscape. By properly managing ecosystems, they and a multitude of other interconnected factors. say, we are also managing their potential to harm Many of these changes have already begun.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009.Qxd
    RisingRising toto thethe ChallengeChallenge Annual Report 2009 From the Executive Director ESA remains financially sound and programmatically strong. n spite of the difficult economic times the country is I facing, ESA remains financially sound and programmatical- ly strong. Our loyal membership stands near 10,000 and the annual meeting—this year in Albuquerque—attracted 3,599 participants with its excellent program offerings. More than 2,000 institutions worldwide subscribe to one or more of our journals, which continue to be among the most highly cited in our field. Ecology, which is 90 years old this year, was named by the Special Libraries Association (SLA) as one of the top 100 most influential journals in science and medicine in the past 100 years. ESA is engaged in a range of activities that are a testament to the breadth of interests of our members. From congressional briefings on “hot” issues to an energized blog; from specialized ESA file photo Credit: conferences and workshops to galvanizing the community behind data sharing; from the continued evo- lution of our prized diversity program to helping faculty use large scale data sets; and from the ever- increasing influence of our journals, ESA continues to be a vibrant and energized society. ESA is also looking to the future. This year, the Governing Board initiated a long range planning process that will examine the existing activities of the Society and anticipate programs and activities that may be needed in the future. We expect that many of our members will be involved in this effort and be asked to help us ensure that ESA stays relevant far into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Urex Srn 2020 Annual Report
    UREX SRN 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Award Number 1444755 Project Period July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2020 (No-Cost Extension granted through June 30, 2021) Reporting Period: July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020 (Year 5) Executive Management Team Charles L. Redman, Arizona State University Nancy B. Grimm, Arizona State University Mikhail V. Chester, Arizona State University Peter Groffman,City University of New York David M. Iwaniec, Georgia State University P. Timon McPhearson, The New School Thaddeus R. Miller, Arizona State University Tischa A. Muñoz-Erickson, USDA Forest Service Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network www.URExSRN.net Table of Contents Overarching UREx SRN Goals 1 Network Partners 2 Common Abbreviations 2 Accomplishments 3 Major Activities Specific Objectives Significant Results Key Outcomes & Other Achievements Opportunities for Training & Professional Development Disseminating Results to Communities of Interest Year 6 Plans Impacts 22 Impact on the Development of the Principal Disciplines of the Project Impact on Other Disciplines Impact on the Development of Human Resources Impact on Physical Resources that Form Infrastructure Impact on Institutional Resources that Form Infrastructure Impact on Information Resources that Form Infrastructure Impact on Technology Transfer Impact on Society Beyond Science & Technology Changes 27 Products 28 Books Book Chapters Journal Articles Conference Presentations Other Publications/Products Thesis/Dissertations Network Researchers 41 External Advisory Members 48 Practitioner Organizations 49 Overarching UREx SRN Goals Climate change is widely considered to be one of the greatest challenges to global sustainability, with extreme events being the most immediate way that people experience this phenomenon. Urban areas are particularly vulnerable to these events given their location, high concentration of people, and increasingly complex and interdependent infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Approaches to Long-Term Studies of Urban Ecological Systems
    Articles IntegratedIntegrated ApproachesApproaches toto Long-TermLong-Term Studies Studies ofof UrbanUrban EcologicalEcological SystemsSystems NANCY B. GRIMM, J. MORGAN GROVE, STEWARD T. A. PICKETT, AND CHARLES L. REDMAN n 1935, Arthur Tansley wrote: I URBAN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS PRESENT We cannot confine ourselves to the so-called “natural” entities and ignore the processes and expressions of vegetation now so MULTIPLE CHALLENGES TO ECOLOGISTS— abundantly provided by man. Such a course is not scientifically PERVASIVE HUMAN IMPACT AND EXTREME sound, because scientific analysis must penetrate beneath the HETEROGENEITY OF CITIES, AND THE forms of the “natural” entities, and it is not practically useful because ecology must be applied to conditions brought about by NEED TO INTEGRATE SOCIAL AND human activity. The “natural” entities and the anthropogenic ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES, CONCEPTS, derivates alike must be analyzed in terms of the most appropriate concepts we can find. (Tansley 1935, p. 304) AND THEORY This quote captures the spirit of the new urban emphasis The conceptual basis for studying urban in the US Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) net- ecological systems work. We know now that Earth abounds with both subtle and pronounced evidence of the influence of people on Why has the study of urban ecological systems attracted so natural ecosystems (Russell 1993, Turner and Meyer much recent interest? The rationale for the study of 1993). Arguably, cities are the most human dominated of human-dominated systems is three-pronged. First, all ecosystems. Recent calls for studies on “human-domi- humans dominate Earth’s ecosystems (Groffman and nated ecosystems” (Vitousek et al. 1997) finally have been Likens 1994, Botsford et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Thenetwork Ewsletter
    The etwork Newsletter Message from the Executive Director Strategic Planning for LTER Robert B. Waide, Executive Director, Roger Bales, Barbara Bedford, Robert tion of NET activities as well as visits by LTER Network Office Dickinson, Jim Levitt, John Magnuson, Pam NET staff to sites for joint discussions of Matson, Elinor Ostrum, Jack Stanford, needs. The LTER Network will spend the next few Margaret Werner-Washburne, Michael Development of these strategic plans will months developing a strategic plan to help Goodchild, and Paul Risser, Chair) this benefit greatly from the involvement of a define future goals and activities of the summer. After revision, the strategic plan will wide range of LTER scientists and students. network. The 20 Year Review Committee be rolled out at the All Scientists Meeting for Two groups have already been asked to called for such a plan, saying: general comment before taking final form. focus on specific sections of the Network “The LTER program must forge a bold NSF has also asked the LTER Network strategic plan. The LTER Education Commit- decade of synthesis science that will lead to Office (NET) to develop its own strategic tee has been working on a strategic plan for a better understanding of complex environ- plan. This request was based on a series of education in the LTER Network for over a mental problems and result in knowledge that recommendations made by the Site Review year. This plan, when completed, will inform serves science and society. To realize this Team that evaluated the Network Office development of the education section of the ambitious goal, the LTER community, renewal proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 2 Girona, 27 June - 1 July 2011 SEFS 7
    SEFS 7 Girona, 27 June - 1 July 2011 Final programme 2 Girona, 27 June - 1 July 2011 SEFS 7 Contents Poster presentations Ordinary Session 1 26 Welcome and Committees 4 Ordinary Session 3 27 About Girona 5 Special Session 3 29 Getting around 5 Special Session 6 30 Commercial opening times 5 Special Session 68 31 Useful telephones 5 Thursday June 30 About the venue5 Oral Sessions Special Session 10 33 Special Session 13 34 At the Meeting 6 Special Session 15 35 Registration 6 Ordinary Session 8 36 Coffee Breaks 6 Special Session 11 3 6 Meals 6 Ordinary Session 10 37 Internet Access 6 Oral presentations 6 Poster presentations Instructions for Oral Presenters 6 Ordinary Session 2 37 Poster Presentations 6 Ordinary Session 5 38 Notice board 6 Ordinary Session 8 39 Social Events Ordinary Session 10 40 Welcome Cocktail 6 Special Session 1 40 Riverwebs 6 Special Session 12 40 Congress dinner 6 Special Session 4 41 Exhibits 6 Special Session 13 41 Exhibition and Poster Floor Map 7 Special Session 14 41 Student Activities 8 Special Session 15 42 Pre-Meeting course 8 Students/Editors Get-Together 8 Friday July 1 43 A European platform Oral Sessions of freshwater young researchers 8 Special Session 4 44 Special Session 1 44 Technical Excursions 8 Ordinary Session 9 45 Biking along the Brugent Stream 9 Ordinary Session 4 45 Sau Reservoir 9 Special Session 14 45 Baix Ter Wetlands 9 Special Session 7 46 «Estany de Banyoles» (Lake Banyoles) 9 Photo Contest for the Technical Excursions 9 Author Index PLENARY LECTURES 10 Margaret A.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Urban Futures
    The Urban Book Series Editorial Board Fatemeh Farnaz Arefian, University of Newcastle, Singapore, Singapore; Silk Cities & Bartlett Development Planning Unit, UCL, London, UK Michael Batty, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, UCL, London, UK Simin Davoudi, Planning & Landscape Department GURU, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK Geoffrey DeVerteuil, School of Planning and Geography, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Andrew Kirby, New College, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA Karl Kropf, Department of Planning, Headington Campus, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK Karen Lucas, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Marco Maretto, DICATeA, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Parma, Parma, Italy Fabian Neuhaus, Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Steffen Nijhuis, Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Vitor Manuel Aráujo de Oliveira , Porto University, Porto, Portugal Christopher Silver, College of Design, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Giuseppe Strappa, Facoltà di Architettura, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Roma, Italy Igor Vojnovic, Department of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Jeremy W. R. Whitehand, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Claudia Yamu, Department of Spatial Planning and Environment, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands The Urban Book Series is a resource for
    [Show full text]
  • Packet Materials for Dec 8-11, 2003 Council Meeting
    JUDI DANIELSON TOM KARIER CHAIR VICE-CHAIR Idaho Washington Jim Kempton Frank L. Cassidy Jr. Idaho "Larry" Washington Gene Derfler Oregon Ed Bartlett Montana Melinda S. Eden kOregon John Hines Montana Steve Crow Executive Director December 2, 2003 DECISION MEMORANDUM To: Council Members From: Erik Merrill and Steve Waste Subject: ISRP and ISAB Appointments Proposed Actions Council staff requests Council actions and discussion pertaining to Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) and Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB) member terms and appointments. Staff asks that the Council: 1) Appoint Dr. John Epifanio, Illinois Natural History Survey, as a member of the ISRP. 2) Approve extension of term limits for the current ISRP members through May 2005. 3) Initiate the process to rebuild the pool of potential ISRP and ISAB members for future appointments by reconvening the National Research Council nomination committee, and, with NOAA Fisheries and the Columbia River Indian Tribes, jointly sending a letter to the region requesting nominations for consideration by the NRC nomination committee. 4) Discuss ISAB member renewals and the appointment process for new ISAB members. The ISRP and ISAB have different responsibilities in the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program, and the Council plays distinct roles in the administration of each group. To avoid confusion between the groups, this memo addresses decisions and background information related to each group separately, first the ISRP and then the ISAB. Independent Scientific Review Panel Background The Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) consists of eleven members assisted by a number of Peer Review Group (PRG) members. The ISRP was created by amendment to the Northwest Power Act in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Distinguished Scientist Seminar Semester in Environmental Science MBL ECOSYSTEMS CENTER, WOODS HOLE, MA
    2015 Distinguished Scientist Seminar Semester in Environmental Science MBL ECOSYSTEMS CENTER, WOODS HOLE, MA Mercedes Pascual Professor, Dept. of Ecology and Evolution University of Chicago Infectious Disease Dynamics under a Changing Climate September 18th — 2:30 PM Lillie Auditorium, MBL Mercedes Pascual is a mathematical ecologist interested in predicting the behavior of dynamic biological systems. She has published on a wide range of topics including chaotic behavior in predator-prey populations, controls on phytoplankton growth, and the structure and dynamics of food web networks. In recent years, she has focused her research on the question of how a warmer climate, together with an increasingly mobile, urbanized and growing human population will affect the geographic distribution, transmission and incidence of diseases such as cholera, malaria and leishmaniasis, a parasitic disease that is found in parts of the tropics, subtropics and Europe. Dr. Pascual is currently a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago. Prior to coming to Chicago, she was a Rosemary Grant Collegiate Professor at the University of Michigan, holding appointments in both Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and at the Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. She earned a M.Sc., Mathematics from New Mexico State University and a doctorate in Biological Oceanography from the joint program of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She has received a number of awards and honors. She was elected a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2003 and was named one of the top 50 Women in Science by Discover Magazine that same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroeco 2017
    HydroEco 2017 Ecohydrology on the Edge: ecology-hydrology-human interactions in a changing world 6th International Multidisciplinary Conference on Hydrology and Ecology University of Birmingham 18-23 June 2017 1 About HydroEco2017 Ecohydrology as a scientific discipline has been emerging from the need to address the interactions and feedbacks between ecological, hydrological, geomorphological and atmospheric processes, and aims to understand and predict fast changing aquatic-terrestrial environments. Over the last decade, the scientific discipline of Ecohydrology has seen rapid technological and conceptual developments. The highly dynamic and often non-linear behaviour of ecohydrological processes pose unique challenges in understanding, monitoring and conserving freshwater ecosystems. Complex process interactions often cause ecohydrological processes to show pronounced temporal dynamics and exhibit marked non-linear behaviour in response to environmental change. Such behaviour manifests itself by the occurrence of distinct thresholds, tipping points or hot moments, periods of enhanced (re)activity and rapid regime shifts; but may also be associated with pronounced spatial heterogeneity, producing locations of enhanced activity or hot spots. The 6th International Multidisciplinary Conference on: Hydrology and Ecology will focus on “Ecohydrology on the edge: ecology-hydrology-human interactions in a changing world” 2 Contents Contents Local Organisers .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Draft Report of the BERAC Workshop on Input for Development
    DRAFT of BERAC IFL initial workshop report – not for dissemination A Draft Report of the BERAC Workshop on Input for Development of an Integrated Field Laboratory With a Focus Incorporating Urban Systems as Part of Human – Earth System Interactions Submitted by (alphabetical order) James Ehleringer, University of Utah Nancy Grimm, Arizona State University Lucy Hutyra, Boston University Anthony Janetos, Boston University Ruby Leung, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory February 19, 2015 1 DRAFT of BERAC IFL initial workshop report – not for dissemination Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 A Workshop Exploring an IFL Incorporating Coupled Natural-Human-Built Ecosystems ............. 4 1.2 Tapping the Expertise of University and National Laboratory Scientists ......................................... 5 1.3 Background to prepare for the workshop .......................................................................................... 5 1.4 Structure of the Workshop ................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Exploring the Need for an IFL ............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Key science questions driving the need for an IFL ........................................................................... 7 2.2 Modeling, Data Integration, and Collaboration
    [Show full text]