Art and Technology Between the Usa and the Ussr, 1926 to 1933

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Art and Technology Between the Usa and the Ussr, 1926 to 1933 THE AMERIKA MACHINE: ART AND TECHNOLOGY BETWEEN THE USA AND THE USSR, 1926 TO 1933. BARNABY EMMETT HARAN PHD THESIS 2008 DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY OF ART UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR ANDREW HEMINGWAY UMI Number: U591491 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591491 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I, Bamaby Emmett Haran, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 ABSTRACT This thesis concerns the meeting of art and technology in the cultural arena of the American avant-garde during the late 1920s and early 1930s. It assesses the impact of Russian technological Modernism, especially Constructivism, in the United States, chiefly in New York where it was disseminated, mimicked, and redefined. It is based on the paradox that Americans travelling to Europe and Russia on cultural pilgrimages to escape America were greeted with ‘Amerikanismus’ and ‘Amerikanizm’, where America represented the vanguard of technological modernity. They returned to America with examples of and reports on Constructivism and an attendant enthusiasm for American technology, which manifested as ‘machine art’. It proved deeply problematic when Leftist artists attempted to marry this notion of Amerika with a critique of the divisiveness of American industry and tried to construct a radical Americanism with the tools of Amerikanizm. This study covers work in several media, including photography, cinema, theatre, literature, printmaking, and architecture. I chart the introduction of Constructivism into America through publications and exhibitions during the period. The first chapter follows the emergence of Constructivism in Europe and its arrival in America, most notably at the 1927 Machine-Age Exposition, and its slow transformation into the apolitical International Style. Chapter Two assesses the impact of Constructivist theatre in America, with particular reference to the radical New Playwrights Theatre. The third chapter concerns the machine aesthetic in the photography of Ralph Steiner and Walker Evans. The final chapter addresses the discourse and practice of montage in the American experimental cinema. I am concerned with a period that straddles the Crash of 1929, but precedes the New Deal relief programmes. It is an analysis of culture at the blurred boundary of radical politics and experimentation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Andrew Hemingway for his kind and thoughtful guidance of this project. His knowledge and understanding of American and European avant- garde culture and the political history of the period have made the research much easier than it should have been, and his insightful, rigorous, good-humoured, and above all encouraging commentary on the emerging thesis made the realization of the project much less tortuous than it could have been. This thesis began life in Andrew's MA course on art and politics in America from the 1920s to the 1950s, and the material discussed here stems from my MA dissertation on the Machine-Age Exposition, a project that Andrew supervised. Throughout his supervision Andrew has been very generous in sharing his own research materials, has tolerated barely legible drafts and occasional explorations into tangential material, and has patiently helped turn a vague idea of a potential area of research into a finished study. I would also like to thank Fred Schwartz for his assistance in supervising the thesis. Fred’s wide-ranging expertise in German culture and society of the interwar years has helped me develop an understanding of similar cultural artefacts from America during this time. His dynamic interdisciplinary approach to art history and theory have been greatly influential on the conception of this project. Tom Gretton’s periodic commentary has also been of considerable value. The passages in the opening section of this study that concern the tractor as a symbol of American and Russian technological exchanges are indebted to Tom’s remarks about my upgrade paper in 2004. Tom’s dedication to the materiality of works of art has also been of much importance to this thesis. In the Art History department at UCL, Warren Carter, Martin Perks, Ed Krcma, and Richard Taws assisted with producing visual materials at various stages of the project. The postgraduate community in general and the members of the Marxist reading group in particular have provided a useful forum for theoretical discussions and a necessary context for shared grumbles about and celebrations of postgraduate life. 5 The staff at the Film Department and the Photography Department of the Museum of Modem Art, the Photography Department of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Museum of the City of New York, the Harvard Houghton Library, the Tamiment Library at New York University, and the Archives of American Art in New York all provided much help in the process of research. Murray Weiss, who looks after Ralph Steiner’s estate, was extremely generous in providing permission for image reproduction gratis, and patiently responded to obscure questions about Steiner’s life and career. His memories of Steiner added much colour to the work. Robert Haller at the Anthology Film Archives in New York, a wonderful and eccentric institution, was most helpful with his recollections of some of the protagonists of the thesis and was also generous with his time. The Arts and Humanities Research Council provided essential funding for maintenance and fees, which really made the project viable. The Graduate School at UCL supplied much-needed funds for travel to America. I would like to thank my parents for their support throughout the thesis. In particular, my mother Rusty Haran provided some crucial translations of German texts, which made some important material available to me. Above all, I want to thank Jo Haran for her unfailing support, remarkable patience, kind advice, and love. Our daughters, Molly and Bridie Haran, arrived at different points in the project, and whilst not providing any concrete help they have certainly enriched the years it took to produce this thesis. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT: 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 6 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS: 7 INTRODUCTION: 12 An Amerika Machine CHAPTER ONE: 32 From the Machine-Age Exposition to Machine Art: from International Constructivism to the International Style. CHAPTER TWO: 94 A Machine Age Theatre: Constructivism and the New Playwrights Theatre. CHAPTER THREE: 157 New and Old Visions in American Photography: Ralph Steiner, Walker Evans, and Americanism. CHAPTER FOUR: 212 Amerikino: Montage and the Machine in American Experimental Cinema. CONCLUSION: 270 Mr West in the Land of the Bolsheviks. BIBLIOGRAPHY: 288 ILLUSTRATIONS: 343 7 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Louis Lozowick, Goat Ripping, Tajikistan , lithograph, 1932. 2. Louis Lozowick, Airport, Tajikistan , lithograph, 1932. 3. Louis Lozowick, Steam Shovel in Desert, Tajikistan , lithograph, 1932. 4. Louis Lozowick, Collective Farmer, lithograph, 1932. 5. Louis Lozowick, Coming For Cotton, Tajikistan , lithograph, 1932. 6. Louis Lozowick, Border Guards, Tajikistan, lithograph, 1932. 7. Sergei Eisenstein, The General Line, film still, 1929. 8. Alexander Dovzhenko, Earth, film still, 1929. 9. Don Brown, ‘Across the Globe: Tractors for our Fellow Workers’, drawing, Soviet Russia Pictorial, 1923. 10. Boris Ignatovich The First Tractor (American Fordson Tractor), photograph, 1927. 11. Margaret Bourke-White, The New Tractor, photograph, 1931. 12. Margaret Bourke-White, State Farm, No. 2, photograph, 1931. 13. Louis Lozowick, Machine-Age Exposition Poster, 1927. 14. Fernand Leger, Machine-Age Exposition Catalogue Cover, 1927. 15. Vesnin Brothers, Design for Labour Building, Moscow, 1923. 16. Konstantin Melnikov, Soviet Pavilion, Exposition des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels Modemes, 1925. 17. V. Tatlin, Monument For the Third International, wooden model, 1920, with Tatlin standing adjacent. 18. El Lissitzky, PROUN, oil on wood, 1923. 19. Stuart Davis, Eggbeater No. 7, oil on canvas, 1927. 20. Frederick Kiesler, City in Space, Exposition des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels Modemes, 1925. 21. Frederick Kiesler, L and T System, Internationale Ausstellung neuer Theatertechnik (International Exhibition of New Theatre Techniques). Konzerrthaus, Vienna, 1924. 22. Gerrit Rietveld, Berlin Chair, 1933. 23. Frederick Kiesler, Window Design for Saks Fifth Avenue, New York, 1928. 24. Frederick Kiesler, Window Display Design for Saks Fifth Avenue, New York, 1928. 25. Louis Lozowick, Window Display Design for Lord and Taylor, New York, 1926. 26. Frederick Kiesler, Display for AUDAC, 1931. 27. Frederick Kiesler, Display for AUDAC, 1931. 28. Frederick Kiesler, Model for The Space Theatre, Woodstock, NY, 1932. 29. Frederick Kiesler, Film Guild Cinema, New York, 1929. 30. Frederick Kiesler, Design for the Institute
Recommended publications
  • Marta Hegemann, Ausgehend Von Zweidimensiona­ Len, Silhouettenhaften Figurationen Aus Häuserkuben, Segelbooten, Tischlampen, Drachen, Vögeln Etc
    ven/Ret Marut. ln der Wohnung am Hildepoldplatz formierte sich die .,Gruppe Stu­ pid" und installierte dort von 1919-20 die Dauerausstellung desselben Titels. Diese erste kleine Privatschau stellt den Auftakt der Ausstellungsbeteiligungen Marta He­ gemanns dar, deren vorläufiger Schlußpunkt das Jahr 1989 bildet, dieTeilnehme an der Ausstellung des Kölnischen Kunstvereins an läßlich des 150. Jubiläums .,Vom Ma­ ler Bock zur schönen Gärtnerin". Abstraktsurreale Arbeiten und Figurenkompositionen der 1920er und 1930er Jahre Von 1919 bis 1933 erarbeitete Marta Hegemann, ausgehend von zweidimensiona­ len, silhouettenhaften Figurationen aus Häuserkuben, Segelbooten, Tischlampen, Drachen, Vögeln etc. ihre originäre Bildsprache, die immer wieder das Thema Frau in Einzel- und Doppelvarianten paraphrasiert, wobei sie die ausschließlich jungen Frauen oftmals mit ihren charakteristischen Berufsattributen ausstattete und in addi­ tiver Gestaltungsweise so disparate emblematische Bildelemente wie Hände, Beine, Häuser, Windmühlen, Vögel, Katzen, Segelboote etc. zusammenfügte. Anskizzierte Hildegard Reinhardt Häuser, Wände und Treppenabsätze suggerieren eine Räumlichkeit, die die streng Marta Hegemann zweidimensionalen Arbeiten der Frühzeit um 1920 vermissen lassen. Marta Hegemann Einleitung Daß Marta Hegemann die Thematik der weibliche Figurenkompositionen bereits Dem in den 1960er Jahren erwachten Interesse an de'r Aufarbeitung bildkünstleri• Mitte der 1920er Jahre in vollgültigen Bildformulierungen verarbeitete, beweisen die scher Aktivitäten der 1920er
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandr Bogdanov and Systems Theory
    Democracy & Nature, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000 Aleksandr Bogdanov and Systems Theory ARRAN GARE ABSTRACT The signi cance and potential of systems theory and complexity theory are best appreciated through an understanding of their origins. Arguably, their originator was the Russian philosopher and revolutionary, Aleksandr Bogdanov. Bogdanov anticipated later developments of systems theory and complexity theory in his efforts to lay the foundations for a new, post-capitalist culture and science. This science would overcome the division between the natural and the human sciences and enable workers to organise themselves and their productive activity. It would be central to the culture of a society in which class and gender divisions have been transcended. At the same time it would free people from the deformed thinking of class societies, enabling them to appreciate both the limitations and the signi cance of their environments and other forms of life. In this paper it is argued that whatever Bogdanov’s limitations, such a science is still required if we are to create a society free of class divisions, and that it is in this light that developments in systems theory and complexity theory should be judged. Aleksandr Bogdanov, the Russian revolutionary, philosopher and scientist, has a good claim to being regarded as the founder of systems theory.1 His ‘tektology’, that is, his new science of organisation, not only anticipated and probably in uenced the ideas of Ludwig von Bertalanffy—who must have been familiar with his work,2 but anticipated many of the ideas of the complexity theorists. As Simona Poustlinik commented at a recent conference on Bogdanov: It is remarkable the extent to which Bogdanov anticipated the ideas which were to be developed in systems thinking later in the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeropittura (Aeropainting) Watercolour, with Touches of Silver Pen, with Framing Lines in Green Ink, on Paper Laid Down Onto a Black Card (The Cover of a Notebook?)
    Domenico (Mino) DELLE SITE (Lecce 1914 - Rome 1996) Aeropittura (Aeropainting) Watercolour, with touches of silver pen, with framing lines in green ink, on paper laid down onto a black card (the cover of a notebook?). Signed with monogram, inscribed and dated DSte FUTURISTA / 1932/ LF/ X in white gouache on the backing card, below the image. Titled AERO/ PITTURA on a separate sheet of paper cut out and pasted onto the lower right of the image. Further inscribed Delle Site Domenico / Alunno 4oCorso on the backing card. 93 x 103 mm. (3 5/8 x 4 1/8 in.) [image, at greatest dimensions]. 241 x 175 mm. (9 1/2 x 67/8 in.) [backing card] In September 1929 the Futurist theorist and founder Filippo Tomasso Marinetti published an article entitled ‘Perspectives of Flight and Aeropainting’ in the Gazzetta del Popolo in Turin, signed by Giacomo Balla, Fortunato Depero, Enrico Prampolini and several other Futurist painters. Republished in a revised and more complete version in 1931, the text served as a manifesto of the nascent branch of Futurism known as aeropittura, or Futurist aeropainting: ‘We Futurists declare that: 1. The changing perspectives of flight are an absolutely new reality that has nothing to do with the traditional reality of terrestrial perspectives. 2. The elements of this new reality have no fixed point and are built out of the same perennial mobility. 3. The painter cannot observe and paint unless he experiences the same speed as these elements. 4. Painting this new reality from the air imposes a profound contempt for detail and a need to summarize and transfigure everything…7.
    [Show full text]
  • German Expressionism: the Second Generation (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1988): 10-37
    Stephanie Barron, “Introduction” to Barron (ed.), German Expressionism: The Second Generation (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1988): 10-37. The notion that all the significant achievements of German Expressionism occurred before 1914 is a familiar one. Until recently most scholars and almost all exhibitions of German Expressionist work have drawn the line with the 1913 dissolution of Die Brücke (The Bridge) in Berlin or the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. Peter Selz’s pioneering study German Expressionist Painting, published in 1957, favored 1914 as a terminus as did Wolf-Dieter Dube’s Expressionism, which appeared in 1977. It is true that by 1914 personal differences had led the Brücke artists to dissolve their association, and Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) had disintegrated when Wassily Kandinsky returned from Munich to Russia and Franz Marc volunteered for war service. Other artists’ associations also broke up when their members were drafted. Thus, the outbreak of the war has provided a convenient endpoint for many historians, who see the postwar artistic activities of Ernst Barlach, Max Beckmann, Oskar Kokoschka, Kathe Kollwitz, and others as individual, not group responses and describe the 1920s as the period of developments at the Bauhaus in Weimar or of the growing popularity of Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity). The years 1915-25 have been lost, or certainly not adequately defined, as a coherent and potent, albeit brief, idealistic period in the evolution of German Expressionism. More recent scholarship, including Dube’s Expressionists and Expressionism (1983) and Donald E. Gordon’s Expressionism- Art and Idea (1987), sees the movement as surviving into the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Caffeina E Vodka Italia E Russia: Futurismi a Confronto Claudia Salaris
    Caffeina e vodka Italia e Russia: futurismi a confronto Claudia Salaris Il viaggio di Marinetti in Russia Negli anni eroici del futurismo il fondatore Filippo Tommaso Marinetti era noto con il soprannome di “Caffeina d’Europa” per l’energia con cui diffondeva la religione del futuro da un paese all’altro. Uno dei suoi viaggi memorabili è quello in Russia all’inizio del 1914 1. Invitato a tenere un ciclo di conferenze a Mosca e a Pietroburgo, Il poeta ha accettato con entusiasmo, pensando a un patto d’unità d’azione con i fratelli orientali. Infatti nella terra degli zar il futurismo è nato con caratteristiche proprie,ma è sempre un parente stretto del movimento marinettiano. Nelle realizzazioni dell’avanguardia russa non sono pochi gli echi delle teorie e invenzioni del futurismo marinettiano. Ma, al contrario degli italiani che formano una specie di partito d’artisti omogeneo, i russi sono sparsi in diversi gruppi. Nel 1910 è uscita a Pietroburgo l’antologia Il vivaio dei giudici , a cui hanno collaborato, tra gli altri, i fratelli David e Nikolaj Burljuk, Elena Guro, Vasilij Kamenskij, Viktor Chlebnikov. A costoro presto si sono uniti Vladimir Majakovskij, Benedikt Livshich, Alexandr Kruchënych e alla fine del 1912 il gruppo, che intanto ha assunto il nome di Gileja, pubblica il volume Schiaffo al gusto corrente , che nel titolo rivela la matrice marinettiana, ricalcando il “disprezzo del pubblico” promulgato dal poeta italiano. Il libro collettivo contiene un editoriale-manifesto in cui i gilejani, rifiutando il passato e le accademie, esortano i giovani a “gettare Pushkin, Dostoevskij, Tolstoj, ecc.
    [Show full text]
  • November-2015 Jukebox Songlist
    Jukebox list ARTIST SONG TITLE Year 10CC DREADLOCK HOLIDAY 1978 112 DANCE WITH ME 2002 2 PAC CALIFORNIA LOVE 2000 2 PAC CHANGES 2000 2 PAC GHETTO GOSPEL 2000 28 DAYS AND APOLLO 440 SAY WHAT? 2001 28 DAYS RIP IT UP 2000 3 DOORS DOWN HERE WITHOUT YOU 2003 3 DOORS DOWN ITS NOT MY TIME 2008 3 DOORS DOWN KRYPTONITE 2001 30 SECONDS TO MARS CLOSER TO THE EDGE 2010 30 SECONDS TO MARS THE KILL (BURY ME) 2006 360 FT GOSSLING BOYS LIKE YOU CLEAN 0 3LW NO MORE (BABY IMA DO RIGHT) 2001 3OH!3 DONT TRUST ME 2000 3OH!3 FEAT KATY PERRY STARSTRUKK 2000 3OH3 DOUBLE VISION 0 3OH3 ft Kesha My First Kiss 0 4 NON BLONDES WHATS UP 1992 411 THE DUMB 2004 411 THE FEAT GHOSTFACE KILAH ON MY KNEES 2000 5 Seconds of Summer She Looks So perfect (Warning) 2014 50 CENT 21 QUESTIONS 2003 50 CENT CANDY SHOP 2005 50 CENT FEAT JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE AYO TECHNOLOGY 2000 50 CENT FEAT. MOBB DEEP OUTTA CONTROL 2005 50 CENT IN DA CLUB 2003 50 CENT JUST A LIL BIT 2005 50 CENT P.I.M.P 2003 666 AMOKK 1999 98 DEGREES GIVE ME JUST ONE NIGHT (UNA NOCHE) 2000 A HA TAKE ON ME 1980 A1 CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE 2002 AALIYAH TRY AGAIN 2000 AARON CARTER I WANT CANDY 2000 ABBA DANCING QUEEN 1976 ABBA MAMA MIA 0 ABBA ROCK ME 1979 ABBA WATERLOO 1974 ABC POISON ARROW 1982 ABS WHAT YOU GOT 2002 ACE OF BASE ALL THAT SHE WANTS (12 INCH VERSION) 2000 ACKER BILK STRANGER ON THE SHORE 0 ADAM BRAND KING OF THE ROAD 0 ADAM HARVEY THE HOUSE THAT JACK BUILT 0 ADAM LAMBERT FOR YOUR ENTERTAINMENT 0 ADAM LAMBERT IF I HAD YOU 0 ADELE SET FIRE TO THE RAIN 0 ADRIAN LUX TEENAGE CRIME 0 AEROSMITH I DONT WANT TO MISS A THING 1998 AEROSMITH JANIES GOT A GUN 1989 AFI MISS MURDER 2006 AFROJACK FT EVA SIMONS TAKE OVER CONTROL 2000 AFROMAN BECAUSE I GOT HIGH 2001 Agnes I Need You Now (Radio Edit) 0 AGNES RELEASE ME 2009 AIR LA FEMME DARGENT 1998 AKON ANGEL 2010 AKON DONT MATTER 2007 AKON FEAT COLBY ODONIS & KARDINAL BEAUTIFUL 2009 OFFISHALL Akon Feat Keri Hilson Oh Africa 2010 AKON FEAT SNOOP DOGG I WANNA LOV YOU 2000 AKON FEAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Derda Berlin
    DERDA BERLIN KATALOG ART ON PAPER 05.03.2016 – 01.05.2016 VIERTER KATALOG DER GALERIE DERDA BERLIN Thomas Derda Fasanenstrasse 58 D‐10719 Berlin‐Wilmersdorf www.derdaberlin.com ALLE ABGEBILDETEN ARBEITEN SIND VERKÄUFLICH. PREISE AUF ANFRAGE. Copyright Texte: Thomas Derda und Ralf Kemper (Fotos sind ausschließlich für diesen Verkaufskatalog und nicht weiter verwendbar) KÖLNER PROGRESSIVE Der Kunstkritiker Ernst Kallai hielt Franz Wilhelm Seiwert und Heinrich Hoerle für zwei der stärksten Vertreter einer neuen Generation von deutschen Malern, welche aus der kubistisch‐ expressionistischen Tradition hervorgegangen sind ‐ zu Recht. Das Kölner Museum Ludwig präsentierte zuletzt 2008 eine große Ausstellung unter dem Titel „köln progressiv 1920‐33. seiwert‐ hoerle‐arntz“. Umso mehr freuen wir uns, hier eine Werkgruppe kleiner Meisterwerke im Rahmen dieser Ausstellung präsentieren zu können (Kat. Nrn. 1‐6). Einmal mehr wird die Verbindung zu Berlin‐Wilmersdorf über die Zeitschrift „Die Aktion“ von Franz Pfemfert hergestellt, zu der beide zahlreiche Cover und Illustrationen beisteuerten, zumeist als originalgraphische Holzschnitte. 1. FRANZ WILHELM SEIWERT (1894 – 1933) „Arbeiter vor der Fabrik“ Bleistift auf Papier, 23,0 x 18,0 cm, 1922 Aus dem Besitz Stanislav Kubicki´s. F. W. Seiwert, 1894 in Köln geboren, bildet mit Heinrich Hoerle und Gerd Arntz den Kern der Kölner Progressiven und gibt später deren Sprachrohr, die Zeitschrift a‐z heraus, in der u.a. Artikel über Malewitsch, Severini, Modigliani und Brancusi erscheinen. 1919 gehört Seiwert kurz zur Gruppe der Kölner Dadaisten (Gruppe D) und stellt im Kunstverein zusammen mit Max Ernst, Johannes Baargeld, Hans Arp, Paul Klee, Heinrich Hoerle, Angelika Hoerle und Anton Räderscheidt aus. 1920/21 reist er nach Berlin und freundet sich mit dem Maler und Essayisten Stanislav Kubicki an, aus dessen Besitz unsere Arbeit stammt.
    [Show full text]
  • San Antonio River Walk Designated to Receive an AJA Award; Rice Design Alliance Sponsors High-Powered Panel on Architecture Criticism
    • A winning combination. When classic styling and continuous durability are ... ~~ • brought to- gether the re­ sult is excellence. This quality of excellence is obvious in all the materials at D'Hanis Clay Products. The care taken at every stage of the manufacturing process be­ comes evident in the end product. All of which brings us to another winning com­ bination: construction and D'Hanis Clay Products. [)'lIJ\Nl6 ClJL\Y PQODUCT~ GONTINLJOUS PRODUCTION SINCE 1905 11( >X 1fi', O'I !ANIS, Tf XAS 78850 AN ANH NI l t I ) I 4 0 ltANll1 (5n) 363-7221 CLEIS European Style Whirlpool Bathing Systems &ka½ 4 HESSCO FEATURING • 18 MODELS, 28 SIZES • COMPETITIVE PRICING • MATCH ANY COLOR • PROMPT DELIVERY • INDIVIDUAL JET CONTROLS • COMPLETELY PREPLUMBED CONTENTS IN THE NEWS 22 Dallas Museum ofArt opens to rave reviews; San Antonio River Walk designated to receive an AJA award; Rice Design Alliance sponsors high-powered panel on architecture criticism. ABOUT THIS ISSUE 41 42 SMALL BUILDINGS 42 Articles on eight recent Texas projects that represent a broad range ofproblems and solutions while falling into the same general category-small buildings. INTERVIEW WITH CHARLES MOORE 70 11 NEW TEXAS FELLOWS 84 Profiles of I I Texas architects elected to the American lnstitute's College of Fellows for outstanding contributions to architecture. BOOKS 76 48 INDEX TO ADVERTISERS 98 DA VE BRADEN/MUSINGS 98 COMING UP: Next issue, Texas Architect looks at architecture and transportation. ON THE COVER: William T. Cannady' s Fayeue Savings 58 Association in LaGrange. Photo by Paul Hester. 70 I , , llrchurrt .\furth·April 198-1 5 RENNER PIAl.A - o.11.b Nth,tnr ANPtl, ltK C,,,,,.,,•I Contr,1<fo, I h'1,y &•kl•nM & l"lll"'""'nR 0.wnM Contr,1<l<>r M.-1ro,t(J/,1.1n GI.tu, 'i<,11,J,.,lk•, r,,..., (,l,M /,y - rl'fflP(f/J<S fio,/cl,ipp/•,J no/It_,,,.
    [Show full text]
  • "A Road to Peace and Freedom": the International Workers Order and The
    “ A ROAD TO PEACE AND FREEDOM ” Robert M. Zecker “ A ROAD TO PEACE AND FREEDOM ” The International Workers Order and the Struggle for Economic Justice and Civil Rights, 1930–1954 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia • Rome • Tokyo TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 www.temple.edu/tempress Copyright © 2018 by Temple University—Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education All rights reserved Published 2018 All reasonable attempts were made to locate the copyright holders for the materials published in this book. If you believe you may be one of them, please contact Temple University Press, and the publisher will include appropriate acknowledgment in subsequent editions of the book. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Zecker, Robert, 1962- author. Title: A road to peace and freedom : the International Workers Order and the struggle for economic justice and civil rights, 1930-1954 / Robert M. Zecker. Description: Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 2018. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017035619| ISBN 9781439915158 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781439915165 (paper : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: International Workers Order. | International labor activities—History—20th century. | Labor unions—United States—History—20th century. | Working class—Societies, etc.—History—20th century. | Working class—United States—Societies, etc.—History—20th century. | Labor movement—United States—History—20th century. | Civil rights and socialism—United States—History—20th century. Classification: LCC HD6475.A2
    [Show full text]
  • A Model for Reading Architectural Narrative in Different
    AURUM MÜHENDİSLİK SİSTEMLERİ VE MİMARLIK DERGİSİ AURUM JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND ARCHITECTURE Cilt 1, Sayı 2 | Kış 2017 Volume 1, No. 2 | Winter 2017, 49-58 A MODEL FOR READING ARCHITECTURAL NARRATIVE IN DIFFERENT Türkan Nihan HACIÖMEROĞLU1 1 Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Architecture. [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract When Daniel Libeskind proposed the possibility of different dimensions of architecture other than length, height and width, he offered reading, writing and memory. Reading architecture as he explains is not about reading text but about trying to understand a not “clearly explicit language” of architecture. (Libeskind, 2004) The aim of this paper is to propose a model for reading architectural narrative in different media by using architectural criticism as a base. Initially, the study is based on discussions on architectural criticism, narrative and representation, in architecture, literature and cinema, in order to understand the similarities and differences between the concepts of time, movement and space. Using these concepts, a comparative analysis table is created and the outcomes of these comparisons are inserted as data for different, yet inter-linked, comparisons and analysis tables. A num- ber of keywords are utilized to set a model for reading architectural narrative. Such alternative readings estab- lish a ground to understand the narrative and cultural based conceptualization of space. The main discussion is executed through a case study. L’ecumé des Jours by Boris Vian (Foam of the Daze, 1947), and consequently, its 49 2013 adaptation Mood Indigo by Michel Gondry, are selected as the case.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Systems Theory?
    What is Systems Theory? Systems theory is an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science, and is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work together to produce some result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical or informational artifact. As a technical and general academic area of study it predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy's General System Theory (GST), among others, in initiating what became a project of systems research and practice. Systems theoretical approaches were later appropriated in other fields, such as in the structural functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann . Contents - 1 Overview - 2 History - 3 Developments in system theories - 3.1 General systems research and systems inquiry - 3.2 Cybernetics - 3.3 Complex adaptive systems - 4 Applications of system theories - 4.1 Living systems theory - 4.2 Organizational theory - 4.3 Software and computing - 4.4 Sociology and Sociocybernetics - 4.5 System dynamics - 4.6 Systems engineering - 4.7 Systems psychology - 5 See also - 6 References - 7 Further reading - 8 External links - 9 Organisations // Overview 1 / 20 What is Systems Theory? Margaret Mead was an influential figure in systems theory. Contemporary ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the work of Béla H. Bánáthy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene Odum and Fritj of Capra , organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge , interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Arts and Architecture PLANTAE, ANIMALIA, FUNGI: TRANSFORMATIONS OF NATURAL HISTORY IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN ART A Dissertation in Art History by Alissa Walls Mazow © 2009 Alissa Walls Mazow Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 The Dissertation of Alissa Walls Mazow was reviewed and approved* by the following: Sarah K. Rich Associate Professor of Art History Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee Brian A. Curran Associate Professor of Art History Richard M. Doyle Professor of English, Science, Technology and Society, and Information Science and Technology Nancy Locke Associate Professor of Art History Craig Zabel Associate Professor of Art History Head of the Department of Art History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract This dissertation examines the ways that five contemporary artists—Mark Dion (b. 1961), Fred Tomaselli (b. 1956), Walton Ford (b. 1960), Roxy Paine (b. 1966) and Cy Twombly (b. 1928)—have adopted the visual traditions and theoretical formulations of historical natural history to explore longstanding relationships between “nature” and “culture” and begin new dialogues about emerging paradigms, wherein plants, animals and fungi engage in ecologically-conscious dialogues. Using motifs such as curiosity cabinets and systems of taxonomy, these artists demonstrate a growing interest in the paradigms of natural history. For these practitioners natural history operates within the realm of history, memory and mythology, inspiring them to make works that examine a scientific paradigm long thought to be obsolete. This study, which itself takes on the form of a curiosity cabinet, identifies three points of consonance among these artists.
    [Show full text]