FSU Jews in US and Canada (Brym, Slavina, Lenton)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FSU Jews in US and Canada (Brym, Slavina, Lenton) Contemporary Jewry https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-020-09315-5 Qualifying the Leading Theory of Diaspora Jewry: An Examination of Jews from the Former Soviet Union in Canada and the United States Robert Brym1 · Anna Slavina2 · Rhonda Lenton3 Received: 16 August 2019 / Accepted: 4 March 2020 © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract The leading theory of the Jewish diaspora asserts that Jewish communities outside Israel are steadily shrinking and assimilating to dominant cultures, with the decline being especially advanced among Jews from the former Soviet Union. We test this proposition with data from the 2013 Pew Survey of American Jews and the 2018 Survey of Canadian Jews. Our fndings suggest that Canada deviates from the global trend to a degree that afects even Jews from the former Soviet Union residing in that country. Although only about 25,000 Canadian Jews currently residing in Can- ada were born in the former Soviet Union and immigrated since 1970—a small frac- tion of the number who immigrated to Israel, the United States and Germany over the past fve decades—the Canadian outpost is worth studying because its features require a qualifcation of the leading theory of the Jewish diaspora, namely that assimilation rates vary by identifable features of national context. Keywords Jews from the former Soviet Union · Canada · United States · Religious retention · Ethnic retention An earlier version of this paper was presented at a symposium in honor of Dr. Mark Tolts, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 27 June 2019. We are grateful to the anonymous Contemporary Jewry reviewers for especially insightful and gracious comments that signifcantly improved the fnal product. We also thank Anna Shternshis, Director of the Anne Tanenbaum Centre for Jewish Studies at the University of Toronto, for subsidizing the oversample of Jews from the former Soviet Union in the 2018 Survey of Canadian Jews. Funding and in-kind contributions in support of the larger study were provided by Robert Brym (through the S.D. Clark Chair of Sociology at the University of Toronto), the Environics Institute (Keith Neuman, Executive Director) and Rhonda Lenton (President and Vice-Chancellor, York University). Additional funding was provided by the UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, the Jewish Foundation of Manitoba, the Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal and Federation CJA (Montreal). * Robert Brym [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 R. Brym et al. 1 The Leading Theory of the Jewish Diaspora The leading theory of the Jewish diaspora claims that Jewish communities outside Israel are shrinking due to a total fertility rate below the replacement level; a con- comitant increase in mean age; a high and rising intermarriage rate leading to wide- spread assimilation; and ongoing out-migration to Israel, though much moderated in recent decades. Due to these factors, the population of the Jewish diaspora stood at 10.5 million in the middle of the twentieth century and declined to 8.2 million in 2000. According to DellaPergola et al. (2000), the Jewish diaspora population can be expected to fall to just fve million by 2080, with no Jews left in the former Soviet Union (FSU) by that date. Gitelman (1998, 2013) is among the leading proponents of this theory. He argues that nationalism and religion are the only enduring bases for Jewish exist- ence, so disaspora Jews who are neither ardent Zionists nor religiously observant are bound to diminish in number and fnd the strength of their Jewish identity weaken- ing. The results of multiple surveys in various countries add weight to his claim. For example, surveys conducted in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus show that Jews who do not plan on emigrating from the FSU tend to be more religiously and ethnically assimilated to non-Jewish cultural norms than are those who decide to emigrate, while Jewish émigrés choosing to go to the West tend to be more religiously and ethnically assimilated than those choosing Israel as their destination (Brym with Ryvkina 1994; Gitelman 2013; see also Shrayer 2017). To be sure, the research literature identifes exceptions to the general trend. For example, unlike the Jewish community of the former Soviet Union, the Jewish communities of Western Europe and the United States have not experienced mass out-migration. The relatively high level of formal education achieved by diaspora Jews and their concentration in relatively high-status socioeconomic locations has increased opportunities for intra-ethnic interaction and thus mitigated assimilation (Goldscheider and Zuckerman 1984; Hartman and Hartman 2009; Rebhun 2015). Still, in most of the diaspora, total fertility and in-migration rates have been low enough to lead to population decline, while the permeability of ethnic boundaries and the thinning out of cultural content has been made possible by increasing inter- marriage and other forms of close association with non-Jews. As Gitelman (2013) wrote, “American Jews, who had all the cultural and religious facilities during the 70 years that their Soviet brethren had very few, are ‘catching up and overtaking,’ as Nikita Khrushchev liked to say.” Nor does he restrict his generalization to American Jewry; provocatively, he claims that “we are all Russians now.” 1 Hebrew and Yiddish: “In a place where there is no person, a herring is a fsh too.” 1 3 Qualifying the Leading Theory of Diaspora Jewry: An Examination… Table 1 The Canadian Jewish community is more cohesive than its counterpart in the United States: indicators of Jewish religious and ethnic retention, Canada 2018 and USA 2013 (in percent). Sources: Pew Research Center (2013a) and Brym et al. (2019a) USA (n = 3475) Canada Diference (n = 2335) Percent endogamous, 18–29-year-oldsa 29 68 39 Non-synagogue Jewish organization membership (yes) 18 47 29 Synagogue membership (yes) 31 58 27 Percent endogamousa 50 77 27 All or most friends Jewish 32 57 25 Lights shabat candles weekly or usually 22 46 24 Financial donation to Jewish cause in past year (yes) 56 80 24 Attended Jewish summer campb (yes) 38 58 20 Attended full-time Jewish schoolb (yes) 23 43 20 Average 26 a Canadian fgures based on 2011 population data b In the US survey, asked only of people who said they were brought up Jewish or who have at least one Jewish parent Canadian Exceptionalism? The leading theory of the Jewish diaspora notwithstanding, Canada seems to be bucking the global trend. For one thing, the Canadian Jewish population is grow- ing and now stands at about 392,000, or as much as 398,000 according to a recent Statistics Canada estimate (Smith and McLeish 2019). According to the Pew Survey of World Religions, Canada overtook France as home to the world’s sec- ond largest Jewish diaspora community in 2010—second, of course, to the much larger American Jewish community (Pew Research Center 2015). Other analysts claim that the Jewish population of France is still larger than that of Canada, but even their fgures suggest that, if current trends persist, Canada’s Jewish popula- tion will be larger than that of France in less than a decade (DellaPergola 2017, 2018). Beyond the population count, behavioral indicators suggest that Canadian Jews tend to be signifcantly less assimilated than are their American counterparts. The 2018 Survey of Canadian Jews (Brym et al. 2019b) and the 2013 Pew Survey of American Jews (2013b) provide numerous comparable measures of ethnic reten- tion, nine of which are listed in Table 1. The 2335 Jews in the Canadian survey score higher than the 3475 Jews in the American survey on in-marriage, friendship ties with fellow Jews, attending full-time Jewish school, and various forms of Jew- ish religious observance. Canadian Jewry is more “institutionally complete” than is American Jewry, as indicated by substantially higher rates of synagogue and other Jewish organizational membership in Canada (Breton 1964). On average across all nine indicators, Canadian Jews score 26 percentage points higher than do American 1 3 R. Brym et al. Jews. Despite sampling diferences between the two surveys, we are convinced that most of the observed diference refects the Canadian Jewish community’s greater ethnic cohesiveness.2 These data suggest that what are perhaps the two largest diaspora communities, the United States and Canada, are substantially diferent. What accounts for the dif- ference? We believe three main factors are at play. First, in proportionate terms, immigration has been considerably more robust in Canada than in the United States since World War II. Consequently, 30% of Cana- dian Jews are immigrants compared to just 14% of American Jews. Canadians there- fore tend to have stronger ties to “old country” traditions and languages than do American Jews. The second factor accounting for Canadian Jewry’s higher level of religious and ethnic retention is that Canadian national identity is much weaker than American national identity; raucous displays of national pride, so frequent in the United States, are considered unseemly in Canada, except during some international sports tour- naments (Adams 1997: 171). Because of their strong American patriotism, Ameri- can Jews have historically been less enthusiastic than Canadian Jews about Zion- ism. This tendency has mitigated the assimilation of Canadian Jews for more than a century. The Canadian/American diference in strength of national identity exists partly because the United States was frst settled by Europeans a century earlier and has therefore had more time for a national identity to crystallize. Probably more impor- tant is the fact that Canadian national identity emerged gradually with the peaceful evolution of independence from Great Britain, while American national identity was forged in an anti-colonial war that, like all group confict, sharpened and hardened group identity (cf.
Recommended publications
  • Jew Taboo: Jewish Difference and the Affirmative Action Debate
    The Jew Taboo: Jewish Difference and the Affirmative Action Debate DEBORAH C. MALAMUD* One of the most important questions for a serious debate on affirmative action is why certain minority groups need affirmative action while others have succeeded without it. The question is rarely asked, however, because the comparisonthat most frequently comes to mind-i.e., blacks and Jews-is seen by many as taboo. Daniel A. Farberand Suzanna Sherry have breached that taboo in recent writings. ProfessorMalamud's Article draws on work in the Jewish Studies field to respond to Farberand Sherry. It begins by critiquing their claim that Jewish values account for Jewish success. It then explores and embraces alternative explanations-some of which Farberand Sheny reject as anti-Semitic-as essentialparts of the story ofJewish success in America. 1 Jews arepeople who are not what anti-Semitessay they are. Jean-Paul Sartre ha[s] written that for Jews authenticity means not to deny what in fact they are. Yes, but it also means not to claim more than one has a right to.2 Defenders of affirmative action today are publicly faced with questions once thought improper in polite company. For Jewish liberals, the most disturbing question on the list is that posed by the comparison between the twentieth-century Jewish and African-American experiences in the United States. It goes something like this: The Jews succeeded in America without affirmative action. In fact, the Jews have done better on any reasonable measure of economic and educational achievement than members of the dominant majority, and began to succeed even while they were still being discriminated against by this country's elite institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State University Libraries
    )ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2020 The Jewish Civilization Samuel P. Huntington Forgot About: A Critique of Judeo-Christian Civilizational Values Dominique Rebekah Hoffman Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY College of Social Sciences and Public Policy THE JEWISH CIVILIZATION SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON FORGOT ABOUT: A CRITIQUE OF “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN” CIVILIZATIONAL VALUES By DOMINIQUE REBEKAH HOFFMAN A Thesis submitted to the Department of International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Summer, 2020 1 SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON is the Eaton Professor of the Science of Government and Director of the John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies at Harvard University. His theory was published first in a paper titled Clash of Civilizations in 1993. He later expanded upon his theory in a book titled The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. My thesis challenges Huntington’s oversight in not classifying a Jewish civilization, which he justifies as part of Western civilization based on shared “Judeo-Christian” values. Huntington’s work is widely debated, and not universally accepted. This essay assumes Huntington’s thesis is a lens to view international relations, this thesis does not hypothesize nor debate the validity of Huntington’s thesis in its entirety, rather seeks to challenge his classification of civilizations. For work that argues Huntington’s thesis is valid, please read the work of Robert D. Kaplan titled Looking the World in the Eye. For work that challenges the validity of Huntington, please read the work of Edward Said titled Clash of Ignorance (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Front Matter
    Memories of Youth: Slovak Jewish Holocaust Survivors and the Nováky Labor Camp Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Antony Polonsky & Joanna B. Michlic, Advisors In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for Master’s Degree by Karen Spira May 2011 Copyright by Karen Spira ! 2011 ABSTRACT Memories of Youth: Slovak Jewish Holocaust Survivors and the Nováky Labor Camp A thesis presented to the Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Karen Spira The fate of Jewish children and families is one of the understudied social aspects of the Holocaust. This thesis aims to fill in the lacuna by examining the intersection of Jewish youth and families, labor camps, and the Holocaust in Slovakia primarily using oral testimonies. Slovak Jewish youth survivors gave the testimonies to the Yad Vashem Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Authority in Jerusalem, Israel. Utilizing methodology for examining children during the Holocaust and the use of testimonies in historical writing, this thesis reveals the reaction of Slovak Jewish youth to anti-Jewish legislation and the Holocaust. This project contributes primary source based research to the historical record on the Holocaust in Slovakia, the Nováky labor camp, and the fate of Jewish youth. The testimonies reveal Jewish daily life in pre-war Czechoslovakia, how the youth understood the rise in antisemitism, and how their families ultimately survived the Holocaust. Through an examination of the Nováky labor camp, we learn how Jewish families and communities were able to remain together throughout the war, maintain Jewish life, and how they understood the policies and actions enacted upon them.
    [Show full text]
  • (2007-2010) Haskalah, Assimilation and Zionism in Galicia Der Wissen
    Between Traditionalism and Assimilation. Views on the Galician Jewry in Nathan Samuely, Karl Emil Franzos and Saul Raphael Landau. Francisca Solomon Betreut durch: Klaus Samuel Davidowicz, Doktoratskolleg “Galizien” (2007-2010) Johann Sonnleitner, Andrei Corbea-Hoisie Der Wissenschaftsfonds. M ost works of secondary literature dealing with M y thesis is essentially based on the methods of comparative text analysis and literary imagology. the above-mentioned authors employ a work-immanent Moreover, it contains elements from the field of the history of ideas and mentalities and draws on approach of analysis and apply the methodology of German methods from cultural transfer research. and Slavic literary criticism. While recent years saw the he more recent research approaches in the field of cultural studies make it possible to analyze publication of numerous studies and doctoral theses on Tthe complex of the Haskalah, assimilation and Zionism in Galicia in a very detailed manner. In the life and work of Karl Emil Franzos, which very much the given context, an analysis based on cultural transfer theory seems most suitable to demonstrate contributed to an “academic popularization” of the author the transcultural dimensions of these ideological orientations. and the problematic thematic complex of Galicia, Nathan n my thesis, I will thus show how cultural transfer took place from west to east, both at the Samuely and Saul Raphael Landau remained relatively Imicro and macro level. This will be exemplified by pointing out essential ideological structures unknown. Only a small number of papers deal with them and character constellations in the authors’ texts. Cultural transfer processes can be seen in the or mention them in passing.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Jewish Future After Immigration and Ethnicity Fade: H
    religions Article The American Jewish Future after Immigration and Ethnicity Fade: H. A. Wolfson’s Analysis in 1918 Joel Perlmann Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, 30 Campus Rd, Annandale-On-Hudson, NY 12504, USA; [email protected] Received: 11 October 2018; Accepted: 14 November 2018; Published: 19 November 2018 Abstract: H. A. Wolfson arrived in the United States at 16 from the Lithuanian region of the Russian Empire and at Harvard as a freshman five years later. He remained at Harvard until his death in 1974, as Emeritus Professor of Hebrew Literature and Philosophy. Among the most important historians of western religious philosophy, he published on contemporary issues only until 1925 and even then only rarely. Nevertheless, his 1918 article, “Pomegranates”, deserves attention. Wolfson clearly followed debates about the American ethnic future. He carved out an original and unexpected position on that issue, and on the American Jewish future within that context. He perceptively rejected Horace Kallen’s views of a “multi-national America”, and like Israel Zangwill’s Melting Pot, he stressed that full cultural and political assimilation would occur in the United States. But unlike Zangwill, he argued that Jewish religious creativity would find a long-term place in American life, once freed of its national trappings. Strongly supporting a Hebraic renaissance and a Jewish homeland in Palestine, he also emphasized with great force that the “we”—the east-European Jewish intellectuals and the Zionists—had greatly misunderstood the promise of Reform Judaism for the diaspora. Keywords: American Judaism; melting pot; pluralism; assimilation; Zionism; Yiddish nationalism Harry Austryn Wolfson died in 1974 at the age of 87, having spent his life since 1908 at Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jewish Denominationalism: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
    American Voices American Jewish Denominationalism: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow David Ellenson In approaching the topic of Jewish religious denominationalism in America today, I will begin with an autobiographical “confession.” I was raised in an Orthodox synagogue, sent all of my children either to Solomon Schechter schools or Camp Ramah, was a member of a Conservative as well as a Reform congregation for over twenty years of my life, am an Associate member of the Reconstructionist Rab- binical Association as well as an alumnus of the rabbinical school of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, and currently serve as President of the premiere educational institution of the Reform Movement. My journey across denominational lines may well be instructive for a discus- sion of denominationalism, for my story of “boundary-crossings” is hardly unique among present-day American Jews. After all, denominational commitments and affiliations can be and have been approached on a host of different levels — ideolog- ical, institutional and folk. The first refers to the set of overarching general beliefs that inform the diverse movements and that are articulated by the elite leaders of each movement, while the second marks the organizational structures that mark each one. Finally, the folk level bespeaks those informal and highly eclectic sets of practices and beliefs that characterize the persons who affiliate with the diverse movements that are present in modern-day Jewish life. My journey is “instructive” precisely because it represents how permeable the borders often are for so many Jews as they traverse the diverse and multi-layered paths of modern Jewish life in their search for spiritual meaning and community.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series 2019
    International Development ISSN 1470-2320 Working Paper Series 2019 No.18-192 Poverty and Mass Education: the Jews in the Roman Empire David Aberbach Published: November 2018 Department of International Development London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street Tel: +44 (020) 7955 7425/6252 London Fax: +44 (020) 7955-6844 WC2A 2AE UK Email: [email protected] Website: www.lse.ac.uk/InternationalDevelopment Poverty and Mass Education: the Jews in the Roman Empire David Aberbach Senior Research Fellow, LSE International Development Professor of Hebrew and Comparative Studies, Department of Jewish Studies, McGill University [email protected] 11 November 2018 Origins of mass education of the poor can be traced to the rabbinic tradition in 3rd century CE Galilee, in reaction to repeated defeats of Jewish revolts against Rome, though the extraordinary social mobility of literate European Jews occurred only with the rise of State secularization and mandatory secular education, and accompanying Jewish emancipation after 1789. Abstract: Since 1789, mass education has been a key factor in development, enabling large numbers of people to escape at least the worst effects of poverty. This paper explores an ancient harbinger of mass education, among Jews in the Roman empire, the basis of Jewish religious education to modern times. Education became vital to Jewish survival after three disastrous wars against Rome (66-73, 115-117, and 132-135 CE), when the Jewish state was destroyed together with Jerusalem and its Temple, the centre of Jewish religion, as well as the Temple priesthood and Jewish aristocracy, leaving the authority of the Torah to its teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immigrant Woman:Jewish Assimilation in the Lower East Side Ghetto of New York City, 1880-1914
    Student Research History Theses University of Puget Sound Year 2012 The Immigrant Woman:Jewish Assimilation in the Lower East Side Ghetto of New York City, 1880-1914 Rachael Siegel [email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/history theses/1 The Immigrant Woman: Jewish Assimilation in the Lower East Side Ghetto of New York City, 1880-1914 Rachael Siegel 12/14/2012 Siegel 1 “The last day of our journey comes vividly to my mind. Everybody was on deck…enraptured by the sight of the harbor and the Statue of Liberty suddenly emerging from the mist. Ah, there she was, the symbol of hope, of freedom, of opportunity! She held her torch high to light the way to the free country, the asylum for the oppressed of all lands. We too…would find a place in the generous heart of America. Our spirits were high, our eyes filled with tears.” 1 The United States was viewed as a beacon of hope for many Eastern European Jews who fled difficult lives. These people had experienced a history of poverty and pogroms in Eastern Europe. They were expelled from cities, their leaders were denied communal authority, and they faced many restrictions regarding occupation and the right to own land and real estate. 2 The tsarist autocracy, for example, confined its Jewish subjects to the Pale of Settlement, 3 and created poverty-stricken communities, called Shtetl, which were easy targets for pogroms and other legal restrictions.4 But the immigrants’ transition to life in to New York City was not easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Emancipation and Schism: Economic Development and Religious Change ∗
    Jewish Emancipation and Schism: Economic Development and Religious Change ∗ Jean-Paul Carvalho Mark Koyama University of California, Irvine George Mason University June 17, 2016 Abstract This paper studies the impact of Jewish Emancipation and economic develop- ment on Jewish religious culture in 19th century Europe. In Germany, a liberal Reform movement developed in response to emancipation, while ultra-Orthodox Judaism emerged in eastern Europe. We develop a historical narrative and model of religious organization that accounts for the polarized responses by Jewish com- munities. Our explanation is based on a tradeoff between time and money contri- butions. A religious organization chooses between a relatively affluent community that expends little effort on religious participation and a poorer community that devotes a large amount of time and effort to religious activity. Political and economic development shape this tradeoff in unexpected ways, leading to com- plex forms of behavior such as religious schisms and cycles. When preferences are transmitted intergenerationally, organizations tend to be more conservative. Our historical narrative points to further extensions of extant models of religion, as well as providing broader insights into cultural integration and religious change. JEL Classification: D23, N33, Z12, J24 Keywords: economics of religion, club goods, community, economic development ∗Carvalho: Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, 3151 Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697, [email protected]. Koyama: Center for Public Choice, Carow Hall, George Mason University, VA 22030, [email protected]. We thank the editor and two anonymous referees for their comments. We are grateful for valuable conversa- tions with Eli Berman, Lloyd Cohen, Tyler Cowen, Stephan Funk, Noel Johnson, Tom Klein, Mike McBride, Avner Offer, Francis Teal, Jared Rubin, Gaston Yalonetzky and Peyton Young.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA, Race, and Gene Talk in Judaism and Messianic Judaism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by IUScholarWorks Lineage Matters: DNA, Race, and Gene Talk in Judaism and Messianic Judaism Sarah Imhoff and Hillary Kaell In July 2012, Jewish Voice host Jonathan Bernis began his week- ly television program by telling the audience: “One of the questions I’m asked by Christians who love Jewish people and Israel is ‘How can I find out if I am Jewish? I just feel so Jewish. Is there any way to know?’” Then he introduced his guest: “My guest today says yes you can. He claims your history is actually written into your cells. He is a DNA expert who helps people discover their ancestry through DNA testing, and he is the world’s foremost authority on DNA testing as it relates to Jewish lineage. Please help me welcome to Jewish Voice DNA expert Bennett Greenspan.”1 At first, Bernis and Greenspan may seem like odd bedfellows. Bernis is a Messianic Jew and his target audience is evangelical and Pentecostal Christians with connections to Messianic Judaism, a loose movement of congregations, missionary associations, and online min- istries that incorporate aspects of Jewish culture and ritual into Chris- tianity. Messianic Jews believe that Judaism is a heritable “genetic” lineage and that Jews, therefore, remain Jewish even after they are “completed” through belief in the messiahship of Jesus. Although this idea is the fundamental basis for the movement, today upwards of 70 percent of congregants are actually what insiders call Gentile Believers (GBs), a fact that few scholars have addressed in depth likely because “ethnic” Jews like Bernis comprise Messianic Judaism’s public face.2 By contrast, Greenspan, CEO of the largest personal DNA test- ing company in the world, is Jewish, not Messianic.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews and Protestants
    Jews and Protestants Jews and Protestants From the Reformation to the Present Edited by Irene Aue-Ben-David, Aya Elyada, Moshe Sluhovsky and Christian Wiese Supported by the I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and The Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 1798/12) Die freie Verfügbarkeit der E-Book-Ausgabe dieser Publikation wurde ermöglicht durch den Fachinformationsdienst Jüdische Studien an der Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg Frankfurt am Main und 18 wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken, die die Open-Access-Transformation in den Jüdischen Studien unterstützen. ISBN 978-3-11-066108-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-066471-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-066486-7 Despite careful production of our books, sometimes mistakes happen. Unfortunately, the CC license was not included in the original publication. This has been corrected. We apologize for the mistake. Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Lizenz. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Das E-Book ist als Open-Access-Publikation verfügbar über www.degruyter.com, https://www.doabooks.org und https://www.oapen.org. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019955542 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2020, Aue-Ben-David et al., published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image: ulimi / DigitalVision Vectors / gettyimages.de Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Open-Access-Transformation in den Jüdischen Studien Open Access für exzellente Publikationen aus den Jüdischen Studien: Dies ist das Ziel der gemeinsamen Initiative des Fachinformationsdiensts Jüdische Studien an der Universitäts- bibliothek J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacred State: Religion, Politics and the Jerusalem Temple
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2012 The aS cred State: Religion, Politics and the Jerusalem Temple Rebecca M. King Scripps College Recommended Citation King, Rebecca M., "The aS cred State: Religion, Politics and the Jerusalem Temple" (2012). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 92. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/92 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SACRED STATE: RELIGION, POLITICS AND THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE by: REBECCA KING SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFERROR GILBERT PROFESSOR MHETA PROFESSOR EISENSTADT APRIL 20, 2012 R. King 2 Table of Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................3 A Brief History: The Jerusalem Temple’s Construction, Destruction, Reconstruction, Renovation and Final Destruction ......................................................................................8 The Beginning: David and Solomon’s Temple .......................................................8 Solomon’s Temple as a Political Institution ..........................................................13 Kings of the First Temple ......................................................................................14
    [Show full text]