DOCSLIB.ORG

Bishop of Rochester Academy, Magpie Hall Road, Chatham, Kent ME4 5JB Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bishop of Rochester Academy, Magpie Hall Road, Chatham, Kent ME4 5JB Proposal MC/11/1202 Date Received: 11 April, 2011 Location: Bishop of Rochester Academy, Magpie Hall Road, Chatham, Kent ME4 5JB Proposal: Demolition of existing building and erection of a new educational building with outdoor sports pitches; games cou rts; a staff car park on land south west of academy site; new access on Magpie Hall Road; together with other car and cycle parking, landscaping and ancillary works Applicant: BAM Construction Ltd Agent: Mr M Page DHA Planning Eclipse House Eclipse Park Sittingbourne Road Maidstone ME14 3EN Ward Luton & Wayfield _________________________________________________________________ Recommendation of Officers to the Planning Committee, to be considered and determined by the Planning Committee at a meeting to be held on 3 August, 2011. Recommendation - Approval with Conditions (as amended/updated by submissions received on 6, 7, 10, 27 & 28 June 2011 and 11 July 2011) 1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. Reason: To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended). 2 Approved plan numbers The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approve d plans and details (as subsequently updated by details approved pursuant to other conditions of this permission): • Indicative drawings 4071SERVSK5002INO & 4071SERVSK5002INO and drawings DHA/7841/01; BoRA-10409- PA-TS01, TS02, TS03, 07, 11, 12, 13 & 14; and 635-PL-040-00, 041-00, 050-00, 051-00, 100-00, 101-00, 102-00, 103-00, 104-00 & 105-00 received 11 April 2011; • Indicative drawings P145-1475D & 4071SERV4901PO received 20 April 2011; • Drawing BoRA-10409-PA-10-A (site boundary only) received 27 April 2011; • Drawings BoRA-10409-PA-04-A, 05-A & 06-A; and 635-PL-009- 01, 010-01, 012-01, 013-01, 030-01, 031-01, 032-01, 033-01 & 034-01 received 6 June 2011; • Drawings BoRA-10409-PA-01-B, 02 Rev A, 03-B, 08 Rev C & 09 Rev B received 27 June 2011; • Drawing 635-PL-011-01 received 28 June 2011; and Planning Statement, Design and Access Statement, Ecological Appraisal and BREEAM Schools Design-stage Assessment, BREEAM Pre- Assessment Report, Tree Survey & Arboricultural Implications Assessment, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Interpretative Report on Ground Investigation, Desk Top Land Contamination Report, Geotechnical & Land Contamination Assessment, Transport Assessment, Travel Plan, Noise Impact Assessment, Flood Risk Assessm ent, Energy Strategy Report and Statement of Community Involvement received 11 April 2011, External Lighting Assessment received 20 April 2011, Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Report received 6 June 2011, PPS5 Heritage Impact Assessment received 7 June 2011, Response to Road Safety Audit received 10 June 2011, letter from agent dated 27 June 2011, Geotechnical & Land Contamination Assessment (Phase 1 and Phase 2 Areas) received 28 June 2011 and Ecological Assessment: Protected Species Surveys received 11 July 2011. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 External Materials No development shall take place on the construction of the replacement buildings hereby approved until details and samples of all materials to be used externally together with typical detail sections of the canopy and roof/wall, window/wall junctions (including classroom blocks and the main hall) at a scale of 1/20 or greater have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Aut hority and the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the appearance of the development is satisfactory and without prejudice to conditions of visual amenity in the locality in accordance with Policy BNE1 of the Medway Local Plan 2003. 4 Trees and landscaping Within six months of the commencement of the development hereby approved (or prior to their first use/implementation on site if that is sooner) a scheme of hard and soft landscaping shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This scheme shall include measures to prevent vehicle parking taking place outside of the allocated parking spaces, any changes to ground levels, means of enclosure, minor structures (such as external furniture and refuse storage) and hard surfacing materials together with planting plans, written specifications and schedules of plants noting species, plant sized and proposed numbers/densities and an implementation programme. All hard and soft landscaping including planting, seeding and turfing comprised in the approved scheme of landscaping shall be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation programme and any trees or plants which within 5 years of planting are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of a similar size and species . Reason: Pursuant to condition 197 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and to protect and enhance the appearance and c haracter of the site and locality, with regard to Policies BNE1, BNE6, BNE20 and BNE34 of the Medway Local Plan 2003 and Policy BE6 of the South East Plan 2009. 5 A landscape management plan including long term design objectives, management responsibilit ies and maintenance schedules for all landscape areas shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the first occupation of the main new building hereby approved. The landscape management plan shall be carried out as approved. Reason: Pursuant to condition 197 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and to protect and enhance the appearance and character of the site and locality, with regard to Policies BNE1, BNE6, BNE20 and BNE34 of the Medway Local Plan 2003 and Policy BE6 of the South East Plan 2009. 6 In this condition "retained trees" means an existing tree which is to be retained in accordance with the approved plans and particulars until the expiration of 5 years from the date of occupation of the buildi ng for its permitted use. a) No retained tree shall be cut down, uprooted or destroyed, nor shall any retained tree be pruned other than in accordance with the approved plans and particulars without the written approval of the Local Planning Authority. Any pruning approved shall be carried out in accordance with British Standards 3998 (Tree Work). b) If any retained tree dies or is removed, uprooted or destroyed within 5 years of the completion of the development hereby permitted, another tree shall be pl anted at the same place and that tree shall be of such size and species and shall be planted at such time as is submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: Pursuant to condition 197 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and to protect and enhance the appearance and character of the site and locality, in accordance with Policies BNE1 and BNE6 of the Medway Local Plan 2003. 7 No development shall commence (including bringing any equipment, machinery or materials on the si te for the purposes of the development) until details of the following have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority: (a) tree protection measures in compliance with British Standard 5837 Trees in Relation to Construction; (b) an arboricultural method statement in compliance with British Standard 5837 Trees in Relation to Construction for all works in close proximity to retained trees (including any site access, site offices, storage for waste, plant and materials, inst allation of services, level changes and removal of existing structures); (c) the design of no-dig hard surfaces within the root protection areas of retained trees in compliance with British Standard 5837 Trees in Relation to Construction; and (d) a per son suitably qualified in arboriculture who shall be appointed to supervise construction activity taking place on the site. The works on site shall be carried out in accordance with these approved details, the approved arboricultural supervisor being re sponsible for this including the implementation of the protective measures and of the works deemed necessary by the arboricultural method statement. Where ground measures are deemed necessary to protect root protection areas the arboricultural supervisor shall ensure that these are installed prior to any vehicle movement, earth moving or construction activity occurring in these areas Reason: Pursuant to condition 197 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and to protect and enhance the appearance and character of the site and locality, in accordance with Policies BNE1 and BNE6 of the Medway Local Plan 2003. 8 The fencing and boundary treatment of the site shall be in accordance with the site security strategy hereby approved (drawing BoRA-10409-PA-08 Rev C) unless updated pursuant to other conditions of this planning permission. Any repairs to the existing boundary treatment (including the addition or removal of access points on to Magpie Hall Road) shall be undertaken using detailing and materials t o match those existing in the adjacent section of boundary. The sections of fencing shown for removal on this drawing shall be removed prior to the first use of the northwest playing fields in respect of the section to be removed from adjacent to this pla ying field area and prior to the first occupation of the main building hereby approved or within 18 months of the first use of the proposed staff car park, whichever is the sooner, in respect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medway Heritage Asset Review 2017 Final Draft: November 2017
    Medway Heritage Asset Review 2017 Final Draft: November 2017 Executive Summary The Medway Heritage Asset Review intends to provide a comprehensive overview of the heritage assets in Medway in order to inform the development of a Heritage Strategy to support the emerging Medway Local Plan 2015. Medway benefits from a rich heritage spanning millennia, underpinning the local distinctiveness and creating a unique and special character that can be readily interpreted through the historic environment. The main report is broken down into sections, initially looking at the topography of Medway and how this influenced human settlement in the area, then looking at the development of the key settlements in Medway; taking into consideration the key drivers for their establishment and identifying existing heritage assets. Furthermore, the main influences to development in the area are also considered; including Chatham Dockyard and the military, the brick, cement and lime industry, agriculture, maritime and religion. Through investigating Medway’s history both geographically and thematically, the significance of heritage assets and the importance of historic landscapes can be readily identified; enabling a better understanding and providing opportunities to enhance their enjoyment. Non-designated heritage assets are also identified using a broad range of sources; providing a deeper knowledge of what shapes the distinct local character experienced in Medway and the how this identity is of great importance to the local community. The report concludes with suggestions for additional areas of research and identifies themes to be considered to inform the development of a coherent and robust Heritage Strategy that will help enhance, understand and celebrate Medway’s heritage for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Download State of Medway: Built Environment 2012
    State of Medway Report: Built Environment January 2009 Contents State of Medway Reports............................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Location............................................................................................................... 2 3. History ................................................................................................................. 2 4. Chatham’s Naval and Military Heritage............................................................... 5 5. Character and Setting of Medway....................................................................... 9 Chatham.................................................................................................................. 9 The Brook................................................................................................................ 9 Chatham Waterfront .............................................................................................. 10 Station Gateway .................................................................................................... 10 Strood.................................................................................................................... 14 Rochester .............................................................................................................. 17 Gillingham.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Heritage. Model Management Framework Contents
    ASCEND Model Management Framework ASCEND Achieving the Socio-Economic Re-use of Former Military Land and Heritage. Model Management Framework Contents. Introduction Foreword by E.U. Commissioner for Regional Policy, Danuta Hübner2 Foreword by Richard Ashworth, MEP for South East England 3 Background Descriptions Medway 4 New Dutch Waterline 6 Cartagena 8 Rostock 10 Venice 12 Charente-Maritime 14 Karlskrona 16 Thessaloniki 18 Process Model 20 Case Studies Medway: Planning for a Sustainable Heritage Environment 32 Developing a Mixed-Use Site 37 Volunteer Management and Engagement 39 Hosting Events in Former Military Heritage 46 The Conversion of HMS Pembroke to University Facilities 50 New Dutch Waterline: Fort Voordorp: Private Investment in Public Hire 55 Fort Vechten: The Development of Market Activities 59 Fort de Bilt: an Anti-Discrimination Exhibition Centre 63 Cartagena: The Spanish Civil War Air Raid Shelters 67 The Development of Large-Scale Barracks Facilities into a “City of Culture” 73 Navidad Fortess, and the Establishment of Cartagena: Port of Cultures 79 The Development of Alcalá de Henares University from the Former Military Facilities 85 Conversion of the Former Military Hospital to the Polytechnic University of Cartagena 90 Rostock: The Establishment of the Heinkel Commission 94 The Conversion of the Former Barracks to University Facilities 102 Venice: Strategies for the Defence System 107 Pact between the Volunteer Association and the Municipality 114 The System Development Model of the Defence System 119 Thetis - A Private
    [Show full text]
  • Chatham Useful Numbers
    INDEXIndex SPONSORSSponsors LocalHISTORY History A TOto ZZ LocalLOCAL Adverts FIRMS UsefulKEY NUMBERS Numbers FreeADD Listing ENTRY www.atozguide.org/chatham Useful Numbers You? Local History A to Z A to Kindly Supported by CHATHAM Free local guide and A to Z directory Free local guide and A to A to Z Directory A to CHATHAM A TO Z GUIDE INDEX INDEX Index Contents This menu is interactive - click on any link to jump straight to your desired classification. The coloured tabs to the right are also live links to help you navigate quickly through the guide. Accountancy Opticians SPONSORS Acupuncture Parenting Sponsors Airports Parking Welcome to your Ambulance Services Performing Arts local A to Z guide. Banks Photo Processing Bridal Shops Photographers We hope that you find it Builders Physiotherapists both interesting and useful. Business Advice Planning Consultants Our aim is to utilise the Business Clubs Podiatrists HistoryLocal advantages of the modern Business Networking Police HISTORY technology to provide you with the information that Charities Price Comparison you need, whenever you Childcare Property Information need it. Chimney Sweeps Property Maintenance You can download this Chiropodists Removals edition by clicking on ‘file’ Chiropractors Schools then ‘save as’ and choosing Churches Schools Independent a suitable location on your computer. This will give Cleaning Services Solicitors you permanent access Computer Consumables Surveyors whenever you like without A TO Z Computer Repairs Tradesmen A to Z having to log on to the Internet. Computer Sales & Train Times Repairs Tyre Sales and Repair One of the biggest Computer Services Voucher Codes advantages of an online guide like this is that we can Computer Software Water continue to add information Consumer Information Wedding Services without the need for print or Counselling distribution costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 19 Contractors
    CHAPTER 19 CONTRACTORS Introduction The Navy Board obtained its supplies for the Yards by inviting tenders and then contracting with firms to provide given quantities of stores at agreed prices. Warrants were issued to individual contractors nominating them as suppliers of the Navy Board. This system of obtaining supplies by advertising for tenders in the Press and awarding the contracts to the lowest bidder who had to provide guarantees by bonds and sureties continued until1869 when a separate Contract and Purchase Department was established for naval, victualling and medical stores. In 1912 the work of this Department was extended to deal with shipbuilding contracts. Contracts pre-1870 Before the end of the 17th century, the Navy Board had a number of standing contracts for a great variety of services: braziers' work, painting, block making, plumbing, etc. Often these contracts required the contractor to have a workshop near or in the Yard. The terms of the contract were usually to supply a particular Dockyard with the items required '... for one year certain' with six months' notice on either side. The Yard could indent on the contractor for supplies without delay and the latter was expected to maintain a reasonable stock. Sir Ambrose Crowley, a contractor for ironwork at the end of the 17th century, complained that at the termination of a standing contract he was left with anchors too large except for use in the Navy. The Resident Commissioner could make limited local purchases 1 of stores. In general a copy of the contract between the Navy Board and the Contractor would be sent by the Clerk of the Acts to the Yard for guidance and receipt of stores.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index Illustrations Are Denoted by Page Numbers in Italics Pottery Fabrics Listed in Tables Are Not Indexed Unless They Appear in the Main Text
    Archaeologia Cantiana - Vol. 131 2011 GENERAL INDEX Illustrations are denoted by page numbers in italics Pottery fabrics listed in tables are not indexed unless they appear in the main text. IA Iron Age arrowhead 202 LBA Late Bronze Age Ash 278, 385-6 LIA Late Iron Age Ashbee, Andrew, Alfred Hambrook’s Mid- RB Romano-British Kent Through Time, reviewed 436 Ashburnham, Joan 321 Acheulian hand-axe 90, 99, 99 Ashburnham family 322-3, 324 Acol 376, 378 Ashford, marriages 386 HMS Actaeon 171, 172 Assheton, Sir Ralph 76 Adam, Stephen, vintner 17 Atholl, David, Earl of 313 Adisham 351 Atterbury, Edward 387 church, tiles 51, 59, 60 Atterbury family 387 agriculture, Thanet 375, 378, 379 Audley, Sir Hugh 218 air defence 170, 174, 177, 188 Austin, H.G., surveyor 349 air raid shelters 172, 175, 176-7, 190, 191 Aylesford Priory 60 airships 172, 191 Aksted, John, armourer 6 Bacheler, Hugh and Agnes 389 Alderstone, John 389 Badock, Julian and Thomas 380, 389 Allhallows Barber, Luke see Waller, Martyn decoy 179 Barbett, William 383 defences 160, 161, 166, 171, 174, 178, Barfreston, windmill 68, 76 180, 186, 187, 190, 192 Barham, floor tiles 60 Slough Fort 164, 167, 169, 180, 189 barn, Roman 413 amphora burials 27 Barnack stone, coffin 90 Anderson, Alderman 146 Barnes, Thomas 382 animal bone barrow cemetery, prehistoric 369-70 cattle 210, 213, 358 barrow mounds, Roman 30 dog 222, 358 Barwick, R.J. 153 horse 213, 214, 358 Bate, Gregory and Agnes (dau.) 389 pig 213, 214, 358 Battle, John 280 sheep/goat 210, 213, 358 Bayham Abbey, floor tiles 62 sites Beacon
    [Show full text]
  • Download Archaeological and Built Heritage Impact
    [project name] Headland Archaeology [project code/job] MIPR INNOVATION PARK MEDWAY, ROCHESTER, KENT Archaeological and Built Heritage Impact Assessment for Medway Council (MC) and Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (TMBC) 30th August 2018 - 0 - Innovation Park Medway, Rochester Headland Archaeology MIPR INNOVATION PARK MEDWAY, ROCHESTER Archaeological and Built Heritage Impact Assessment for Medway Council (MC) and Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (TMBC) 30th August 2018 HA Job no.: MIPR/01 HAS no.: 1308 NGR: 574482 164504 Medway Council & Tonbridge Councils: and Malling District Council Project Manager: Mike Kimber Author: Jen Richards Fieldwork: Jen Richards & Beth Doyle Graphics: Jen Richards Approved by: Mike Kimber - i - Innovation Park Medway, Rochester Headland Archaeology MIPR CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Planning Background ............................................................................................. 2 1.2 Site Description ...................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Consultation ........................................................................................................... 3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boundaries and Physical Characteristics of the District .3 Historical Perspective
    The Defence of Kent Project DISCOVERING AND RECORDING KENT’s 20TH CENTURY MILITARY AND CIVIL DEFENCES MEDWAY DISTRICT _____________________________ The findings MEDWAY MILITARY RESEARCH GROUP February 2008 Medway Military Research Group (2006) Mark Gibson Edmund Gulvin Keith Gulvin Gerd Hoad HOME GUARD SPIGOT MORTAR 1940 Contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 BOUNDARIES AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DISTRICT .3 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE.................................................................................4 SURVEY SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES.....................................................................6 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................8 SUMMARY OF SOURCES......................................................................................11 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL FINDINGS...........................................................15 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED SITES.....................................................................29 HISTORICAL FINDINGS & ASSESSMENT OF SURVIVING KEY SITES ...32 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................39 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................40 Annexe 1 - Detailed Sources......................................................................................41 Annex 2 - Listing Applications,
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologia Cantiana - On-Line Index GENERAL INDEX to VOLUMES CXXXI 2011 (131) to CXXXX (140)
    Archaeologia Cantiana - On-line Index GENERAL INDEX TO VOLUMES CXXXI 2011 (131) to CXXXX (140) Index being created - years added as they are published VOLUMES CXXXI 2011 (131) to CXXXV 2014 (135) as at March 2015 Letter Back to Index Introduction This index covers volumes 131–135 inclusive (2011–2014) at present of Archaeologia Cantiana, later volumes up to Vol. 140 will be added as they are published.. It includes all significant persons, places and subjects. Volume numbers are shown in bold type and illustrations are denoted by page numbers in italic type or by (illus.) where figures occur throughout the text. The letter n after a page number indicates that the reference will be found in a footnote. Alphabetisation is word by word. Women are indexed by their maiden name, where known, with cross references from any married name(s). All places within historic Kent are included and are arranged by civil parish. Places that fall within Greater London are to be found listed under their own name i.e. Eltham etc. Places outside Kent that play a significant part in the text are followed by their post 1974 county. Place names with two elements (e.g. East Peckham, Upper Hardres) will be found indexed under their full place name. This cumulative index was compiled by Mr Ted Connell. T. G. LAWSON, Honorary Editor Kent Archaeological Society, March 2015 Abbreviations m. married Ald. Alderman E. Sussex East Sussex M.P. Member of Parliament b. born ed./eds. editor/editors Notts. Nottinghamshire B. & N.E.S. Bath and North East f facing Oxon.
    [Show full text]