Modern Discoursive Trends in the Debates of British Parliament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modern Discoursive Trends in the Debates of British Parliament УДК 328.3:327](410)p982 G. Riabokon modern discoursiVe trends in the deBATES of British PARLiament The article defines the roles of foreign and domestic political processes and their manifestation in political discourse through parliamentary debates. The article also reviews the trends in the debates in the Houses of Commons of British Parliament and makes conclusion about general shift in the percentage of discussions in favour of foreign policy and positioning the country as a part of European Union and strategic partner of the Unites States of America. Keywords: political discourse, parliamentary debates, ideology, mass media, news. Being a vast field of scientific research, discourse attempts of spreading democracy to the states with analysis has now developed into an independent and totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Ideologies, fully fledged field of study which involves several such as liberalism, socialism, and communism, institutional approaches with their own still exert a significant influence on the sphere of methodological tools. This article will concentrate political cognition and give rise to numerous in- on one of these numerous areas of discourse domain, state and inter-state conflicts always being a viz. political discourse, which presents considerable stumbling block of debating. Another substantial amount of scientific interest and draws enough part of political discourse is presented by political scholar attention taking into account recent trends relations, such as power, inequality, hegemony, on political map of the world. Widely discussed and oppression, terrorism, etc. which remain the top significantly important for nowadays establishment, issues in political charts of many countries and political discourse still remains difficult to define often make headlines in world media. and delimit from converging fields of study. A All these make political discourse, on one hand, famous scholar Teun van Dijk presents political a form of political action expressed primarily and discourse and its many genres as a specific example mostly verbally as the very root of the word of political action and interaction which may be parliament derives from an Old French verb parler singled out as a prominent way of ‘doing politics’ [3]. which is to speak, and on the other hand, a pan of According to his extended classification, the political processes accessible to general public, political domain involves not only such obvious which is illustrated by an alternative etimology constituents as political actors, events, and of the word parliament which states that encounters, but also, in a wider context, political historically it was compounded by two latin processes, for example, perestrojka, initiated in the words parium (equal) and lamentum (complaints, mid-eighties of 20th century by a declining Soviet laments). this feature is really actual for British regime, construction of integration unions (European parliamentary debates which are usually hotly Union), and military-political blocks (NATO). debated and widely broadcasted via numerous These integration processes caused by globalization media. Debates in the Houses of Commons trends and recent political challenges provoke presented through Written Ministerial Statements in numerous in-state discussions, which in countries the Official Journal of the UK Parliament (Hansard) with diverse national, cultural and religious possess three fundamental premises of parliamentary backgrounds may lead to deep political crises (like discourse implying that (a) the participants are that in Ukraine) and in its ultimate manifestation to Members of Parliament and the process is held in civil wars (Syrian confrontation). The same situation the Institution of parliament; (b) it becomes a inevitably occurs in the sphere of foreign policy political act of legislation and policy-making, making foreign political discourse one the hottest and (c) the consequences of the debates are defined and toughest as it defines the position of the country in a specific terms of policy-making: enacting on the political arena for several decades ahead and laws, deciding policies and holding elections bears significant importance for its residents. [4, p. 21]. According to these features, parliamentary Other vivid spheres of political interaction also debates can be definedas a unique type of political, include discussions about political systems and PR-, and mass-media discourses, and due to its © Рябоконь Г. Л., 2016 78 МАҐІСТЕРІУМ. 2016. Випуск 62. Мовознавчі студії triple nature, pragma-semantic, stylistic and offorming social ideology and shaping political argumentative features of its construction and cognition. Thus ideologies organize attitudes of social delivery act as tactics and strategies of communicative groups toward relevant social and political issues influence on the users of Internet as a global means of according to schematically organized opinions about mass communication [6, p. 54–55]. Moreover, e. g. war and peace, freedom and restrictions, racial parliamentary discourse acts as an important policies, welfare programs, etc and act as driving mechanism of British democracy because the forces for mass movements. Interestingly enough, that speeches in the Parliament fulfill a variety of roles: quite often they may bear noticeable traits of they allow government ministers to present and inconsistency when, for example, speaking about defend new legislation; allow opposition MPs to economic freedom and equality, which, however, debate the merits of such legislation; and they also does not prevent them from discussing on different allow any member to raise questions about the current levels of political comprehension. This can be functioning of government, or propose new actions explained by the fact that each ideology operates not and initiatives [1, p. 1]. This definitely positions by a firm set of principles but rather a free chosen parliamentary debates as one of main areas of talks collection of beliefs which fit the ideological pattern on political arena and extends its role from a purely and ensure general support of public. legislative organ to a powerful tool of influence not The most prominent matters for British society only on political actors, but also on numerous traditionally covered in parliamentary hearings are audience of interested individuals. a) Law, Crime and National Securities; b) Europe; Tentatively and approximately, political discourse c) Defense and Foreign Affairs; d) Environment; and its main constituents, elements and functionsmay e) Health; f) Labour, Employment and Immigration; be presented in the following scheme. g) Civil Rights, Minority Issues, Civil Liberties; h) Education; i) Agriculture; j) Economy [1, p. 7]. Let us survey how they are presented in the debating taking into account modern political trends and world challenges. As has been mentioned before, integration processes make substantial part of parliamentary debates being an urgent need of modern times. The following episode of debates on 10 November 2015 (Example 1) illustrates how Members of Parliament background opposing views on whether and to which extend Britain should be a part of the EU. Using the arguments of labour provision and employment, a One of the most distinctive features of political MP from Conservative party defends the idea of EU discourse altogether with other institutional membership. The main message of this debating is discourses, such as legal, educational or scientific, is emphasizing the responsibility for decision-making that it hardly presents a separate and independent on British people: genre, but rather a class of genres defined by a social (1) Neil Carmichael (Stroud) (Con): Does the domain of politics. Although the boundaries of this Secretary of State agree that the best interests of domain are quite obscure and fuzzy due to business will be served by our being a member of a impossibility to distinctly define what actually makes reformed and reforming European Union? That ‘politics’, we will depart from a rather simplified extends to our remaining in the single market. From definition suggested by T. van Dijk, which, however, my right hon. Friend’s vantage point as President of perfectly fits the frameworks of this article, who the Board of Trade, it is extraordinarily useful that names politics as the discourse of politicians, in other the European Union can negotiate such good strong words, the activities politicians are routinely engaged deals for us globally. in [4, p. 20]. Some of these conventional domains of the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation politicsare presented in the scheme above, with a and Skills and President of the Board of trade necessity to mark that variety of these discursive (Sajid javid): My hon. Friend is right to highlight the activities cannot be limited to such a small number. importance of the need for EU reform, but many This unique possibility to express social attitudes businesses believe that the costs of membership and beliefs through the Members of Parliament as currently outweigh the benefits. As the Prime Minister rather influential figures of political arena makes said, in order for us to get the best deal, we must have parliamentary debates the most effective instrument the referendum and let the British people decide. Рябоконь Г. Л. Сучасні дискурсивні тенденції в дебатах британського парламенту 79 Hannah Bardell (Livingston) (SNP): Writing in settlement in the European Union, to secure jobs and
Recommended publications
  • Summary of the 42Nd Plenary Session, June 2011
    BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN FORTY-SECOND PLENARY SESSION 12-14 June 2011 Cork _________________________________________________________________ OFFICIAL REPORT (Final Revised Edition) MEMBERSHIP OF THE BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION Steering Committee Co-Chairmen Rt Hon Lord COPE Mr Joe McHUGH TD Vice-Chairmen Rt Hon Paul MURPHY MP Rt Hon Laurence ROBERTSON MP Lord DUBS Mr Robert WALTER MP A representative from the National Parliament of Scotland, and the National Assemblies of Northern Ireland, Wales, Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. Members in Attendance Mr Joe BENTON MP Dr Alasdair McDONNELL MP MLA Baroness May BLOOD Mr Mattie McGRATH TD Senator Alan BRECKON Mr David MELDING AM Viscount BRIDGEMAN Senator Paschal MOONEY Mr Conor BURNS MP Mr Patrick O’DONOVAN TD Mr Willie CLARKE MLA Baroness Nuala O’LOAN Senator Paul COGHLAN Senator Joe O’REILLY Mr Oliver COLVILLE MP Ms Ann PHELAN TD Mr Seán CONLAN TD Mr John Paul PHELAN TD Ms Ciara CONWAY TD Mr John ROBERTSON MP Mr Noel COONAN TD Hon Stephen Charles RODAN MHK Senator Maurice CUMMINS Mr Chris RUANE MP Mr Jim DOBBIN MP Mr John SCOTT MSP Mr Stephen DONNELLY Mr Jim SHERIDAN MP Mr Martin FERRIS TD Lord SKELMERSDALE Mr Frank FEIGHAN TD Mr Arthur SPRING TD Mr Paul FLYNN MP Deputy Jane STEPHENS Lord GERMAN OBE Mr Jack WALL TD Senator Imelda HENRY Senator Jim WALSH Mr Martin HEYDON TD Mr Robert WALTER MP Mr Kris HOPKINS MP Mr Jim WELLS MLA Mr Seamus KIRK TD Mr Gavin WILLIAMSON MP Mr Pádraig MacLOCHLAINN TD Rt Hon Lord
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL SYNOD February 2018 QUESTIONS of Which Notice Has Been Given Under Standing Orders 112–116
    GENERAL SYNOD February 2018 QUESTIONS of which notice has been given under Standing Orders 112–116. INDEX QUESTION 1 CHURCH COMMISSIONERS Church Commissioners’ grants Q1 QUESTIONS 2-3 PENSIONS BOARD Manormead Nursing Home Q2 Pensions Funds & Social Investment: response Q3 QUESTIONS 4-7 ARCHBISHOPS’ COUNCIL Setting God’s People Free: follow up Q4 Statistics: Worshipping communities Q5 Statistics: Confirmations Q6 Church attendance by young people Q7 QUESTIONS 8-60 HOUSE OF BISHOPS Discipleship in the family Q8 Passing on the Christian faith Q9 Support for those attending GAFCON Q10 Anglican Communion Companion links Q11-12 HoB Declaration: guidelines re parish resolutions Q13 Communicating HoB response to GS Motions Q14 Support for SSMs Q15 Senior appointments & mutual flourishing Q16 Senior appointments & minorities Q17 Report The Patronising Disposition of Unaccountable Power Q18 Sheffield Report: response Q19 Canon C4 Faculties Q20 HoB Delegation Committee Q21 Sheffield Report: follow-up Q22-23 Freemasonry Q24 Transgender guidance Q25 Human Sexuality Q26 Ministry of Absolution Q27 Conversion Therapy Q28 Mission & the Scottish Episcopal Church Q29 Issues in Human Sexuality & ordinands Q30 Pastoral Advisory Group Q31 Past same sex marriage/civil partnership: advice re church weddings Q32 Welcoming Transgender People Q33 1 Welcoming Transgender People: process Q34 Transgender & Affirmation of Baptism service Q35 Welcoming Transgender people: theological resources Q36 Transgendered people & baptism registers Q37 Affirmation of Baptismal
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints About Alleged Misuse of Parliamentary Dining Facilities
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Complaints about alleged misuse of Parliamentary dining facilities Third Report of Session 2006–07 HC 431 House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Complaints about alleged misuse of Parliamentary dining facilities Third Report of Session 2006–07 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 March 2007 HC 431 Published on 29 March 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt MP (Conservative, North West Hampshire) (Chairman) Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The Hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship Celebrating 25 Years 1994-2019
    VISITING PARLIAMENTARY FELLOWSHIP CELEBRATING 25 YEARS 1994-2019 St Antony's College 1 Roger Goodman, Warden of St Antony’s At a recent breakfast with the students, it was decided that the College should do more to advertise what distinguished it from other colleges in Oxford. St Antony’s is: The Oxford college founded by a Frenchman The Oxford college with two Patron Saints (St Antony of Egypt and St Antony of Padua) The Oxford college where almost 90% of the 500 graduate students are from outside UK and the alumni come from 129 countries The Oxford college with international influence: ‘In the mid-2000s, 5% of the world’s foreign ministers had studied at St Antony’s’ (Nick Cohen, The Guardian, 8 Nov, 2015) The Oxford college mentioned in the novels of both John Le Carré and Robert Harris The Oxford college which holds the most weekly academic seminars and workshops The Oxford college with two award-winning new buildings in the past decade To this list can be added: St Antony’s is the Oxford college with a Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship (VPF). There is no other Oxford college that can boast such a list of parliamentarians responsible for a seminar programme over such a long period of time. The College is immensely proud of the Fellowship and greatly indebted to all those who have held it over the past 25 years. We were very grateful to those who have were able to come to the 25th anniversary celebration of the Fellowship programme at the House of Commons on 24 April 2019 and for the many generous letters from those who could not.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 593 6 March 2015 No. 120 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 6 March 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1189 6 MARCH 2015 1190 House of Commons Mutuals’ Deferred Shares Bill [Lords] Consideration of Bill, not amended in the Public Bill Committee Friday 6 March 2015 The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Clause 2 PRAYERS RESTRICTION ON VOTING RIGHTS 9.45 am [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Tony Baldry (Banbury) (Con): I beg to move Jonathan Evans (Cardiff North) (Con): I beg to amendment 1, page 2, line 14, leave out clause 2. move, That the House sit in private. Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 163). Mr Speaker: With this it will be convenient to discuss amendment 2, in title, line 3, leave out from “shares;” to The House divided: Ayes 0, Noes 41. end. Division No. 169] [9.34 am Sir Tony Baldry: I should make it clear at the outset AYES that the Bill is an extremely valuable and useful one. Tellers for the Ayes: The House is grateful to my hon. Friend the Member Mr Christopher Chope and for Cardiff North (Jonathan Evans) for promoting it Jonathan Evans here. The Bill started in the other place, where there was a comparatively short debate on Second Reading and NOES no Committee stage. I believe that, because time was short, the Government Minister said to the Bill’s promoter, Baldry, rh Sir Tony Johnson, Joseph Lord Naseby, “If you agree to certain amendments, we Bingham, Andrew Jones, Susan Elan Boles, Nick will support the Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee CARE OF CHURCHES AND ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION (AMENDMENT) MEASURE ECCLESIASTICAL PROPERTY MEASURE CHURCH OF ENGLAND (PENSIONS) (AMENDMENT) MEASURE Wednesday 28 January 2015 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £3·00 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Sunday 1 February 2015 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1 Fourth Delegated28 JANUARY 2015 Legislation Committee 2 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chair: MR JAMES GRAY Austin, Ian (Dudley North) (Lab) † Leech, Mr John (Manchester, Withington) (LD) † Baldry, Sir Tony (Second Church Estates Love, Mr Andrew (Edmonton) (Lab/Co-op) Commissioner) † McInnes, Liz (Heywood and Middleton) (Lab) † Barwell, Gavin (Lord Commissioner of Her † Murray, Sheryll
    [Show full text]
  • MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1
    1 MS 254 A980 Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1 Administrative papers Parliamentary Correspondence Correspondence with Members of Parliament 1/1/1 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1978-95 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Diane Abbot, Robert Adley, Jonathan Aitken, Richard Alexander, Michael Alison, Graham Allen, David Alton, David Amess, Donald Anderson, Hilary Armstrong, Jacques Arnold, Tom Arnold, David Ashby, Paddy Ashdown, Joe Ashton, Jack Aspinwall, Robert Atkins, and David Atkinson 1/1/2 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Kenneth Baker, Nicholas Baker, Tony Baldry, Robert Banks, Tony Banks, Kevin Barron, Spencer Batiste and J. D. Battle 1/1/3 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Margaret Beckett, Roy Beggs, Alan James Beith, Stuart Bell, Henry Bellingham, Vivian Bendall, Tony Benn, Andrew F. Bennett, Gerald Bermingham, John Biffen, John Blackburn, Anthony Blair, David Blunkett, Paul Boateng, Richard Body, Hartley Booth, Nichol Bonsor, Betty Boothroyd, Tim Boswell and Peter Bottomley 1/1/4 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1975-94 efforts of the Women’s Campaign
    [Show full text]
  • John Major, 1990-97
    THE MAJOR PREMIERSHIP Also by Peter Dorey BRITISH POLITICS SINCE 1945 THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND THE TRADE UNIONS The Major Premiership Politics and Policies under John Major, 1990-97 Edited by Peter Dorey Lecturer in Politics Cardiff University pal grave macmillan First published in Great Britain 1999 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. * ISBN 978-1-349-27609-7 ISBN 978-1-349-27607-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-27607-3 First published in the United States of America 1999 by ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-21839-3 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Major premiership: politics and policies under John Major, 1990- 97 / edited by Peter Dorey. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-21839-3 (cloth) 1. Major, John Roy, 1943- . 2. Great Britain-Politics and govemment-1979-1997. 3. Conservative Party (Great Britain) I. Dorey, Peter. 1959- . DA591.M33M34 1999 941.085'9'092-dc21 98-38458 CIP Selection, editorial matter, Introduction and chapters 8. 10 and 12 © Peter Dorey 1999 Chapters 1-7, 9 and II © Macmillan Press Ltd 1999 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1999 978-0-333-73681-4 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written pennission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Commissioners Annual Report
    Church Commissioners Commissioners Church Annual Report 2013 Investing in the Church’s growth The Church Commissioners Annual Report 2013 Front cover: The Revd James Barnett, Pioneer Minister to new communities in Leeds, is funded by the Church Commissioners – see page 13 The Church Commissioners Annual Report 2013 Supporting the Church of England’s ministry particularly in areas of need and opportunity Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 12(2) of the Church Commissioners Measure 1947 Copyright © 2014 The Church Commissioners for England Any enquiries about this report should be sent to the Church Commissioners' Secretariat at: Church House Great Smith Street London SW1P 3AZ [email protected] This document is available for download at http://www.churchofengland.org/about-us/ structure/churchcommissioners/annual-reports.aspx This report is printed on paper from responsible sources Church Commissioners Annual Report 2013 01 CONTENTS This report explores how the Church Commissioners invest Overview the Church of England’s historic resources and how we identify areas of need and actively support our network: Contents Church’s ministry Church’s Supporting the Supporting the Review of Governance Financial Church’s ministry investment activity statements The Commissioners' The Commissioners’ fund Read about the work of the Full financial statements mission-funded projects returned 15.9% during 2013, 33 Church Commissioners. for the year ended around the country with longer-term numbers Six hold offices of state; the 31 December 2013 focusing on areas of also remaining strong. other 27 make up the Board along with the need and opportunity. The Commissioners are of Governors. independent auditor's ethical investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Former Members of the House of Commons
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 05324, 7 January 2019 Living former Members Compiled by of the House of Sarah Priddy Commons Living former Members MPs are listed with any titles at the time they ceased to be an MP and the party they belonged to at the time. The list does not include MPs who now sit in the House of Lords. A list of members of the House of Lords who were Members of the House of Commons can be found on the Parliament website under House of Lords FAQs. Further information More detailed information on MPs who served between 1979 and 2010, including ministerial posts and party allegiance, covering their time in the UK Parliament and other legislatures, can be found in the Commons Library Briefing on Members 1979-2010. Association of Former Members of Parliament The PoliticsHome website has contact details for the Association of Former Members of Parliament. Parliament: facts and figures • Browse all briefings in the series This series of publications contains data on various subjects relating to Parliament and Government. Topics include legislation, MPs, select committees, debates, divisions and Parliamentary procedure. Feedback Any comments, corrections or suggestions for new lists should be sent to the Parliament and Constitution Centre. Suggestions for new lists welcomed. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Living former Members of the House of Commons Note: Does not include MPs who are now sit in the House of Lords Name Full Title Party* List Name Mr
    [Show full text]
  • Conduct of Mr Tony Baldry
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Conduct of Mr Tony Baldry Third Report of Session 2005–06 Report and Appendix, together with formal minutes and oral evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 July 2005 HC 421 Published on 21 July 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £12.50 Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt MP (Conservative, North West Hampshire) (Chairman) Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Ben Chapman MP (Labour, Wirral South) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Elfyn Llwd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Rt Hon Andrew Mackay MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Assistance and the Occupied Palestinian Territories
    House of Commons International Development Committee Development Assistance and the Occupied Palestinian Territories Second Report of Session 2003–04 Volume I HC 230–I [incorporating HC 1107–i to–iv, Session 2002–03] House of Commons International Development Committee Development Assistance and the Occupied Palestinian Territories Second Report of Session 2003–04 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 January 2004 HC 230–I [incorporating HC 1107–i to–iv, Session 2002–03] Published on 5 February 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The International Development Committee The International Development Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for International Development and its associated public bodies. Current membership Tony Baldry MP (Conservative, Banbury) (Chairman) John Barrett MP (Liberal Democrat, Edinburgh West) Mr John Battle MP (Labour, Leeds West) Hugh Bayley MP (Labour, City of York) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mr Tony Colman MP (Labour, Putney) Mr Quentin Davies MP(Conservative, Grantham and Stamford) Mr Piara S Khabra MP (Labour, Ealing Southall) Chris McCafferty MP (Labour, Calder Valley) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, Blaby) Tony Worthington MP (Labour, Clydebank and Milngavie) The following Members were also members of the Committee during this inquiry: Alistair Burt MP (Conservative, North East Bedfordshire) and Mr Robert Walter MP (Conservative, North Dorset) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]