DOCSLIB.ORG

On Hypermomentum in General Relativity III. Coupling Hypermomentum to Geometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Hypermomentum in General Relativity III. Coupling Hypermomentum to Geometry On Hypermomentum in General Relativity III. Coupling Hypermomentum to Geometry Friedrich W. Hehl, G. David Kerlick *, and Paul von der Heyde Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität zu Köln (Z. Naturforsch. 31a, 823-827 [1976]; received May 12, 1976) In Part 11 of this series we presented the notion of the material hypermomentum current and motivated its introduction into general relativity. In Part II 2 we showed that a general, linearly connected manifold with symmetric metric (L4, g) is the appropriate geometrical framework for such an introduction. The present paper completes the picture by giving dynamical definitions for energy-momentum and hypermomentum for a minimally coupled material Lagrangian. We derive and discuss the field equations of a new metricaffine gravitational theory which embodies these notions. 1. Dynamical Definition of Hypermomentum obtained by varying with respect to the traceless nonmetricity tensor. In this way we have exploited We now propose the dynamical definition of the analogy between Eqs. (1.8) and (II.5). hypermomentum as the variation of the material One can show by means of the Rosenfeld identi- Lagrangian density with respect to the affine con- ties satisfied by the material Lagrangian that the nection in the space (L4,g). That is, we set** hypermomentum dynamically defined by Eq. (1) is indeed the same quantity that arises from the ca- eA f : - - , (1) nonical definition where the minimally coupled material Lagrangian 3£ J* = - (5) density £(ip,Vip) depends on the metric g^ and the 3(3 iv) connection J1*- as independent variables. We postu- where / j? are the representations of the generators late that the tensor A kji of general coordinate transformations. The anti- so defined is in fact the symmetric part and the trace with respect to j and hypermomentum tensor described in Part /. k of Eq. (5) are the well-known canonical defini- Using the decomposition (II.3) of the connec- tions of the spin angular momentum current and tion, the definition (1) is easily shown to be equiv- the (intrinsic) dilatation current in special rela- alent to the separate relations for spin tivity, respectively. In anholonomic coordinates, the J£ xkji.=J[kj]i = e-1 (2) quantities f ]l represent the generators of the general •öMijk linear group GL (4, R) of which the Lorentz group defined by varying £(1p, 3rp, g, 3g, M, Qi, Q) with and the dilatations are subgroups. respect to the (generalized) contortion tensor, for This last remark seems to preclude the definition the dilatation current of a canonical hypermomentum tensor for spinor fields, since GL (4, R) has no spinor representations. (3) For the time being, at least, we exclude spinor fields from our consideration if we deal with ge- obtained by varying with respect to the Weyl vector, ometries more general than a Y4 . and for the traceless proper hypermomentum The definition (1) and it corollaries (2, 3, 4) AW: -1 gk> Ai = - 2 e"1 <5£/<5Qijk (4) provide a consistent procedure for linking the no- tion hypermomentum, enunciated and given a phys- Reprint requests to Prof. Dr. F. W. Hehl, Institut für ical interpretation in Part I, with the geometry Theoretische Physik der Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Str. 77, D-5000 Köln 41. (L4, g) proposed in Part II. Our remaining task is * Alexander von Humboldt Fellow. the construction of a consistent gravitational theory ** Symbols not defined here are defined in Parts I and II or which incorporates these notions and accords with in Hehl, von der Heyde, Kerlick, and Nester 3. We have our experience. We shall thus require that the new e: = (— det gij) V* and k: = S Jt G/c* where G is Newton's gravitational constant. theory which results will, like the U4 theory, reduce Dieses Werk wurde im Jahr 2013 vom Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by Verlag Zeitschrift in Zusammenarbeit mit der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der für Naturforschung in cooperation with the Max Planck Society for the Wissenschaften e.V. digitalisiert und unter folgender Lizenz veröffentlicht: Advancement of Science under a Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 Lizenz. 4.0 International License. 824 F. W. Hehl et al. • On Hypermomentum in General Relativity. III to Einstein's theory in the realm of macroscopic in an (L4, g) and primarily determining the non- physics. metricity in terms of a new source vki\ It is easy to Recall that the metric condition Qijk = 0 is pos- rewrite the second and third field equations in the tulated from the very beginning in the U4 theory. more suggestive, unified form We now propose to drop this postulate and to see to what extent it can be derived (at least in some (10) 2c <5n- " limit) from the unconstrained metricaffine theory. .here Jkji _ ykji _ ukji _ 2. Field Equations (11) We now complete this dualistic field theory by Up to this point we have left the gravitational field introducing an action function for the gravitational Lagrangian V undetermined; its choice is the sub- field expressed in geometrical variables. Since we ject of the next section. would like to compare the theory which results with the U4 theory and with general relativity, we 3. Gravitational Field Lagrangian choose, instead of the independent variables (gxj, Ffj), the equivalent set of independent quantities The obvious first guess for a gravitational field (g^, S'if, Qijk)- As Fig. 1 of Part II clearly shows, Lagrangian is the curvature scalar in an (L4, g) it is the vanishing of the nonmetricity Qijk which since the U4 theory and Einstein's theory result characterizes a U4 and the vanishing of torsion Sjj* from this choice in the cases of U4 and V4 geome- together with the vanishing of Qijk which charac- tries, respectively. The corresponding density R can terizes the Riemannian spacetime \\ of general be reduced to an effective first-order Lagrangian relativity. We take as the gravitational field Lagran- and varied with respect to metric and connection as gian density a scalar density V which depends on computed in 3. The field equations which result are g, S, Q, and their derivatives. The variational prin- the pair ciple for the interacting system of matter and gravi- cm-kW-.-^tor) (12) tational field is then dg-ii l SR V(g,S,Q)+L(xp,Vxp,g) d4x = 0. (6) (13) 2 Jc 2 e dr% The gravitational field equations are the Euler- where G'7 is the Einstein tensor of an (L4, g), Toli Lagrange equations of this variation with respect to differs from by a divergence, and P}Jl is a ge- the geometrical variables, ometrical tensor computed in Ref. 3 whose prop- 1 •6V 2 d£.(g,S,Q) erties are noted in the Appendix of this article. ol] (7) Particularly troublesome among the properties of k e ö9ü e dgij P'i?1 is that its trace P vanishes identically due to i by 1 b£.(g, S,Q) the projective invariance of the curvature scalar. (8) k = /'* 2 k e SS'if e dS'if The vanishing of P\f! implies via Eq. (13) the inconsistent relation 1 ÖV 2 d£(g,S,Q) vkji. _ _ (9) k e bQijk Ö Q,ijk J!'=0, (14) The first field eq. (7) results from variation with inconsistent because the dilatation current, a physi- respect to the metric tensor and is a generalization cal current which does not vanish in general, is here of Einstein's equation of general relativity. The required to vanish. The projective invariance of R source for the metric is the (L4, g) generalization also means that the Weyl vector Q; is left undeter- of Hilbert's metric energy-momentum tensor o''. mined. The second field eq. (8) resembles the second field The symmetric traceless part of Eq. (13) equation of the U4 theory which relates torsion to P$>=kÄÜ (15) the spin energy potential tensor here also gen- eralized to an (L4, g). The third equation is com- is mathematically consistent and can be resolved to pletely new, making its appearance for the first time give Q in terms of A: F. W. Hehl et al. • On Hypermomentum in General Relativity. III 825 4. The Dilatation Current in a Y4 and Elemen- Quk = k[-2 (Aijk - Ajki + Akij) + gjk A-{] , (16) tary Particle Physics but the antisymmetric part In Part I we mentioned that the dilatation current P[kh =k xkf (17) is conserved exactly in the high-energy "scaling limit" of elementary particle physics. This current contains terms which depend on Qi, so that it is Jk contains both an intrinsic part Ak whose canoni- not possible to determine the torsion uniquely in cal definition is the trace of Eq. (5) and an orbital terms of the spin. Similarly, the Einstein-like Eq. part constructed from the canonical energy momen- (12) for the metric contains (^-dependent terms. tum tensor 2lk. Thus, in special relativity, We note in passing that the projective invariance Jk = Ak + xl2lk. (18) of Jl and the inconsistent eq. (14) already cause trouble in a Y4 theory with scalar curvature La- Note that in the (L4,g) framework the symmetric grangian. The other field equations of that theory part of Zlk obeys the relation = rolk. The are obtainable by setting A = 0 in Eqs. (12) and special relativistic conservation law for Jk is Tk]k (17). = 6'k, where &k is the "soft trace" of the "im- proved" energy-momentum tensor that goes to zero The projective invariance of R has been known in the scaling limit (compare Callan, Coleman, and since Weyl's time (see for example Schouten4).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:0911.0334V2 [Gr-Qc] 4 Jul 2020
    Classical Physics: Spacetime and Fields Nikodem Poplawski Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of New Haven, CT, USA Preface We present a self-contained introduction to the classical theory of spacetime and fields. This expo- sition is based on the most general principles: the principle of general covariance (relativity) and the principle of least action. The order of the exposition is: 1. Spacetime (principle of general covariance and tensors, affine connection, curvature, metric, tetrad and spin connection, Lorentz group, spinors); 2. Fields (principle of least action, action for gravitational field, matter, symmetries and conservation laws, gravitational field equations, spinor fields, electromagnetic field, action for particles). In this order, a particle is a special case of a field existing in spacetime, and classical mechanics can be derived from field theory. I dedicate this book to my Parents: Bo_zennaPop lawska and Janusz Pop lawski. I am also grateful to Chris Cox for inspiring this book. The Laws of Physics are simple, beautiful, and universal. arXiv:0911.0334v2 [gr-qc] 4 Jul 2020 1 Contents 1 Spacetime 5 1.1 Principle of general covariance and tensors . 5 1.1.1 Vectors . 5 1.1.2 Tensors . 6 1.1.3 Densities . 7 1.1.4 Contraction . 7 1.1.5 Kronecker and Levi-Civita symbols . 8 1.1.6 Dual densities . 8 1.1.7 Covariant integrals . 9 1.1.8 Antisymmetric derivatives . 9 1.2 Affine connection . 10 1.2.1 Covariant differentiation of tensors . 10 1.2.2 Parallel transport . 11 1.2.3 Torsion tensor . 11 1.2.4 Covariant differentiation of densities .
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Weyl-Invariant Extension of the Metric-Affine Gravity
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Open Access Repository Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in High Energy Physics Volume 2015, Article ID 902396, 7 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/902396 Research Article Weyl-Invariant Extension of the Metric-Affine Gravity R. Vazirian,1 M. R. Tanhayi,2 and Z. A. Motahar3 1 Plasma Physics Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran 1477893855, Iran 2Department of Physics, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran 8683114676, Iran 3Department of Physics, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Correspondence should be addressed to M. R. Tanhayi; [email protected] Received 30 September 2014; Accepted 28 November 2014 Academic Editor: Anastasios Petkou Copyright © 2015 R. Vazirian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3. Metric-affine geometry provides a nontrivial extension of the general relativity where the metric and connection are treated as the two independent fundamental quantities in constructing the spacetime (with nonvanishing torsion and nonmetricity). In this paper,westudythegenericformofactioninthisformalismandthenconstructtheWeyl-invariantversionofthistheory.Itisshown that, in Weitzenbock¨ space, the obtained Weyl-invariant action can cover the conformally invariant teleparallel action. Finally, the related field equations are obtained in the general case. 1. Introduction with the metric and torsion-free condition is relaxed; thus, in addition to Christoffel symbols, the affine connection would Extended theories of gravity have become a field of interest contain an antisymmetric part and nonmetric terms as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacetime and Geometry: an Introduction to General Relativity Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    SPACETIME AND GEOMETRY: AN INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RELATIVITY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Sean M. Carroll,John E. Neely,Richard R. Kibbe | 513 pages | 28 Sep 2003 | Pearson Education (US) | 9780805387322 | English | New Jersey, United States Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity PDF Book Likewise an explorer from region IV could have a brief look at region I before perishing. Mathematics Kronecker delta Levi-Civita symbol metric tensor nonmetricity tensor Christoffel symbols Ricci curvature Riemann curvature tensor Weyl tensor torsion tensor. Thorne, John Archibald Wheeler Gravitation. When using coordinate transformations as described above, the new coordinate system will often appear to have oblique axes compared to the old system. Indeed, they find some remarkable new regions of spacetime! In general relativity, gravity can be regarded as not a force but a consequence of a curved spacetime geometry where the source of curvature is the stress—energy tensor representing matter, for instance. Views Read Edit View history. Modern cosmological models are a bit more complicated, but retain those features. I was misled even lied to by JG on math. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut. Considering the number of things I did not know it was a good idea to postpone reading this section until now. Tuesday, 25 February Einstein's equation. So I decided to test the flatness idea in two dimensions Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation. It was supposed to be impossible to travel between regions I and IV of the Kruskal diagram and here Carroll
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Spacetime Structure
    Relativistic Spacetime Structure Samuel C. Fletcher∗ Department of Philosophy University of Minnesota, Twin Cities & Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich August 12, 2019 Abstract I survey from a modern perspective what spacetime structure there is according to the general theory of relativity, and what of it determines what else. I describe in some detail both the “standard” and various alternative answers to these questions. Besides bringing many underexplored topics to the attention of philosophers of physics and of science, metaphysicians of science, and foundationally minded physicists, I also aim to cast other, more familiar ones in a new light. 1 Introduction and Scope In the broadest sense, spacetime structure consists in the totality of relations between events and processes described in a spacetime theory, including distance, duration, motion, and (more gener- ally) change. A spacetime theory can attribute more or less such structure, and some parts of that structure may determine other parts. The nature of these structures and their relations of determi- nation bear on the interpretation of the theory—what the world would be like if the theory were true (North, 2009). For example, the structures of spacetime might be taken as its ontological or conceptual posits, and the determination relations might indicate which of these structures is more fundamental (North, 2018). Different perspectives on these questions might also reveal structural similarities with other spacetime theories, providing the resources to articulate how the picture of the world that that theory provides is different (if at all) from what came before, and might be different from what is yet to come.1 ∗Juliusz Doboszewski, Laurenz Hudetz, Eleanor Knox, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Coframe Geometry, Gravity and Electromagnetism
    IARD2012 IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 437 (2013) 012003 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/437/1/012003 Coframe geometry, gravity and electromagnetism Yakov Itin Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem 91904, Israel E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The extensions of GR for description of fermions on a curved space, for supergravity, and for the loop quantum gravity ordinary use a set of 16 independent variables instead of 10 components of metric. These variables can be assembled in a coframe field, i.e., a set of four linearly independent 1-forms. In this presentation we review a geometrical structure based on the coframe field. We construct a complete class of the coframe connections which are linear in the first order derivatives of the coframe field on an n dimensional manifolds with and without a metric. The subclasses of the torsion-free, metric-compatible and flat connections are derived. We also study the behavior of the geometrical structures under local transformations of the coframe. The remarkable fact is an existence of a subclass of connections which are invariant when the infinitesimal transformations satisfy the Maxwell-like system of equations. 1. Introduction. Why do we have to go beyond Riemannian geometry? General relativity (GR) is, probably, the best of the known theories of gravity. From mathematical and aesthetic points of view, it can be used as a standard of what a physical theory has to be. Einstein's theory is in a very good agreement with all up-to-date observation data.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Interpretation of the Einstein-Cartan Formalism
    33 On the Interpretation of the Einstein-Cartan Formalism Jobn Staebell 33.1 Introduction Hehl and collaborators [I] have suggested the need to generalize Riemannian ge­ ometry to a metric-affine geometry, by admitting torsion and nonmetricity of the connection field. They assume that this geometry represents the microstructure of space-time, with Riemannian geometry emerging as some sort of macroscopic average over the metric-affine microstructure. They thereby generalize the ear­ lier approach to the Einstein-Cartan formalism of Hehl et al. [2] based on a metric connection with torsion. A particularly clear statement of this point of view is found in Hehl, von der Heyde, and Kerlick [3]: "We claim that the [Einstein-Cartan] field equations ... are, at a classical level, the correct microscopic gravitational field equations. Einstein's field equation ought to be considered a macroscopic phenomenological equation oflimited validity, obtained by averaging [the Einstein-Cartan field equations]" (p. 1067). Adamowicz takes an alternate approach [4], asserting that "the relation between the Einstein-Cartan theory and general relativity is similar to that between the Maxwell theory of continuous media and the classical microscopic electrodynam­ ics" (p. 1203). However, he only develops the idea of treating the spin density that enters the Einstein-Cartan theory as the macroscopic average of microscopic angu­ lar momenta in the linear approximation, and does not make explicit the relation he suggests by developing a formal analogy between quantities in macroscopic electrodynamics and in the Einstein-Cartan theory. In this paper, I shall develop such an analogy with macroscopic electrodynamics in detail for the exact, nonlinear version of the Einstein-Cartan theory.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Parallel Transportation in Symmetric Teleparallel Geometry
    A novel approach to autoparallels for the theories of symmetric teleparallel gravity Caglar Pala1∗ and Muzaffer Adak2† , 1 2Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Pamukkale University, 20017 Denizli, Turkey 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Erciyes University, 38030 Kayseri, Turkey Abstract Although the autoparallel curves and the geodesics coincide in the Riemannian geometry in which only the curvature is nonzero among the nonmetricity, the torsion and the curvature, they define different curves in the non-Riemannian ones. We give a novel approach to autoparallel curves and geodesics for theories of the symmetric teleparallel gravity written in the coincident gauge. PACS numbers: 04.50.Kd, 11.15.Kc, 02.40.Yy Keywords: Non-Riemannian geometry, Geodesic, Autoparallel curve arXiv:1102.1878v2 [physics.gen-ph] 8 Sep 2021 ∗[email protected] †[email protected] 1 Introduction There have been two main ingredients for the theories of gravity since Isaac Newton; field equations and trajectory equations. The field equations are cast for describing the dynamics of a source and the trajectory ones are the for determining path followed by a spinless massive point test particle. For the Newton’s theory of gravity they are written respectively as ∇2φ =4πGρ (1) d2~r + ∇~ φ =0 (2) dt2 where G is the Newton’s constant of gravity, ~r is the three-dimensional Euclidean position vector of the test particle, t is the time disjoint from the Euclidean space, ρ is the volume density of mass of the source, ∇~ is the gradient operator in the three-dimensional Euclidean space and φ is the gravitational field from a source at the position of ~r.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining Spacetime Nonmetricity with Neutron Spin Rotation in Liquid
    Physics Letters B 772 (2017) 865–869 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Constraining spacetime nonmetricity with neutron spin rotation 4 in liquid He ∗ Ralf Lehnert a,b, , W.M. Snow a,c,d, Zhi Xiao a,e, Rui Xu c a Indiana University Center for Spacetime Symmetries, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA b Leibniz Universität Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany c Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA d Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA e Department of Mathematics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: General spacetime nonmetricity coupled to neutrons is studied. In this context, it is shown that certain Received 3 June 2017 nonmetricity components can generate a rotation of the neutron’s spin. Available data on this effect Received in revised form 19 July 2017 obtained from slow-neutron propagation in liquid helium are used to constrain isotropic nonmetricity Accepted 27 July 2017 − (6) components at the level of 10 22 GeV. These results represent the first limit on the nonmetricity ζ S Available online 1 August 2017 2 000 Editor: A. Ringwald parameter as well as the first measurement of nonmetricity inside matter. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. 1. Introduction The specialized situation in which the nonmetricity tensor van- ishes Nαβγ = 0 and only torsion is nonzero represents the widely The idea that spacetime geometry represents a dynamical phys- known Einstein–Cartan theory [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a May a Torus with Null Riemann Curvature Exist on E3?
    Appendix A May a Torus with Null Riemann Curvature Exist on E3? 1 1 1 We can also give a flat Riemann curvature tensor for T3 S × S T1 T2. First parametrize 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 T3 by (x ,x ), x ,x ∈ R, such that its coordinates in R are x(x ,x )=x(x +2π, x +2π)and x(x1,x2)=(h(x1)cosx2,h(x1)sinx2,l(x1), (A.1) with h(x1)=R + r cos x1, l(x1)=r sin x1, (A.2) where here R and r are real positive constants and R>r(See Figure A.1). 3 Figure A.1: Some Possible GSS for the Torus T3 living in E where the grid defines the parallelism 1 Recall that T1 and T2 have been defined in Section 1.1. 110 Appendix A. May a Torus with Null Riemann Curvature Exist on E3? 1 2 Now, T T3 has a global coordinate basis {∂/∂x ,∂/∂x }, and the induced metric on T3 is easily found as g = r2dx1 ⊗ dx1 +(R + r cos x1)2dx2 ⊗ dx2 (A.3) Now, let us introduce a connection ∇ on T3 such that j ∇∂/∂xi ∂/∂x =0. (A.4) With respect to this connection, it is immediately verified that its torsion and curvature tensors are null, but the nonmetricity of the connection is non null. Indeed, 1 1 ∇∂/∂xi g = −2(R + r cos x )sinx . (A.5) So, in this case, we have a particular Riemann-Cartan-Weyl GSS (T3, g, ∇)withA =0 , Θ=0, R =0.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Dynamical Content of Mags
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience On the dynamical content of MAGs This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 600 012043 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/600/1/012043) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 131.169.4.70 This content was downloaded on 07/03/2016 at 23:01 Please note that terms and conditions apply. Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERE 2014): almost 100 years after Einstein’s revolution IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 600 (2015) 012043 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/600/1/012043 On the dynamical content of MAGs Vincenzo Vitagliano CENTRA, Departamento de F´ısica,Instituto Superior T´ecnico,Universidade de Lisboa - UL, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049 Lisboa, Portugal E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Adopting a procedure borrowed from the effective field theory prescriptions, we study the dynamics of metric-affine theories of increasing order, that in the complete version include invariants built from curvature, nonmetricity and torsion. We show that even including terms obtained from nonmetricity and torsion to the second order density Lagrangian, the connection lacks dynamics and acts as an auxiliary field that can be algebraically eliminated, resulting in some extra interactions between metric and matter fields. Introduction. The intriguing choice to treat alternative theories of gravity by means of the Palatini approach, namely elevating the affine connection to the role of independent variable, contains the seed of some interesting (usually under-explored) generalizations of General Relativity, the metric-affine theories of gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ontology of Spacetime in a Frame of Reference
    On the Ontology of Spacetime in a Frame of Reference Alexander Poltorak 1 Abstract The spacetime ontology is considered in General Relativity (GR) in view of the choice of a frame of reference (FR). Various approaches to a description of the FR, such as coordinate systems, monads and tetrads are reviewed. It is shown that any of the existing FR definitions require a preexisting background spacetime, which, if defined independently of the FR, renders the spacetime absolute in violation of the principle of relativity, or, if defined within an inertial FR (IFR), as it is usually done, makes the argument circular. Consequently, defining a FR in a preexisting spacetime is unacceptable. We show that a FR defines a differentiable manifold with, generally, non-Euclidean geometry. In a noninertial FR (NIFR) the observer must chose a coordinative definition either admitting existence of a universal – inertial – force or settling for non-Euclidean spacetime. Following Reichenbach, it is preferable to eliminate all universal forces and opt for a non-Euclidean geometry. It is shown that a metric-affine space ( L4,g) is best suited to describe the geometry of spacetime within a FR. Considering a gravitational field in an arbitrary FR, we show within the framework of Einstein’s GR that the gravity is described by nonmetricity of spacetime. This result may shed new light on the nature of the cosmological constant and dark energy. I. Introduction One of the fundamental problems of spacetime ontology is how matter affects the geometry of spacetime and, vice versa, how spacetime affects the behavior of the matter therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmology in Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity and Its Dynamical System
    Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79:530 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7038-3 Regular Article - Theoretical Physics Cosmology in symmetric teleparallel gravity and its dynamical system Jianbo Lua, Xin Zhao, Guoying Cheeb Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, People’s Republic of China Received: 28 February 2019 / Accepted: 10 June 2019 / Published online: 20 June 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract We explore an extension of the symmetric telepa- symmetric teleparallel connection that is not metric compati- rallel gravity denoted the f (Q) theory, by considering a ble. This classification highlights that curvature is a property function of the nonmetricity invariant Q as the gravitational of the connection and not of the metric tensor or the mani- Lagrangian. Some interesting properties could be found in fold. It becomes a property of the metric only through the use the f (Q) theory by comparing with the f (R) and f (T ) the- of the Levi–Civita connection. GR can be equivalently for- ories. The field equations are derived in the f (Q) theory. mulated in terms of either of these connections. All of them The cosmological application is investigated. In this theory can be used to define Lagrangians of which Euler-Lagrange the accelerating expansion is an intrinsic property of the uni- equations coincide with the Einstein equations for a particu- verse geometry without need of either exotic dark energy or lar choice of contributing terms. extra fields. And the state equation of the geometrical dark In recent years teleparallel theories have gained more energy can cross over the phantom divide line in the f (Q) attention as alternative theories of gravity.
    [Show full text]