Infrastructure of Serbian Railways Jsc Network Statement 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Infrastructure of Serbian Railways Jsc Network Statement 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE OF SERBIAN RAILWAYS JSC NETWORK STATEMENT 2020 Adopted by the Shareholders of „Infrastructure of Serbian Railways “ JSC No: 5/2019-211-90 dated March 20, 2019 Effective as of Decembre 15, 2019 Applicable to 2019/2020 Timetable 2 Network Statement 2020 Amendments, corrections and interpretations No Subject Determined by the act no. Valid as of The Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian 1. First amendments June 11th, 2019. Railways“ JSC No: 5/2019-224-95 as of June 11th 2019. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian November 18th, 2. Second amendments Railways“ JSC 2019. No: 5/2019-251-106 as of November 18th 2019. The Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian December 16th, 3. Third amendments Railways“ JSC 2019. No: 5/2019-267-109 as of December 16th 2019. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian January 8th, 4. Fourth amendments Railways“ JSC 2020. No: 5/2020-269-111 as of January 8th 2020. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian 5. Fifth amendments March 23rd, 2020. Railways“ JSC No: 5/2020-274-114 as of March 23rd 2020. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian 6. Sixth amendments June 18th, 2020. Railways“ JSC No: 5/2020-282-117 as of June 18th 2020. 3 Network Statement 2020 CONTENTS GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. GENERAL INFORMATION...................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.1. Background Information on Infrastructure Manager ..................................................................... 11 1.1.2. Organisational Chart of Infrastructure Manager ............................................................................ 12 1.1.3. Contact details ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Objective of the Network Statement ............................................................................................... 14 1.3 Legal Framework ............................................................................................................................. 14 1.3.1 Regulations of the Republic of Serbia ............................................................................................ 14 1.3.2 International Regulations ................................................................................................................ 15 1.3.3 Acts of the Infrastructure Manager ................................................................................................. 15 1.4 Legal Status ..................................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 General conditions .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.2 Liability .......................................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.3 Appeals Procedure .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 Structure of Network Statement ...................................................................................................... 16 1.6 Effectiveness of and Amendments to Network Statement .............................................................. 17 1.6.1 Validity Period of Network Statement ........................................................................................... 17 1.6.2 Updating Process ............................................................................................................................ 17 1.7 Publishing, Distribution and Availability of the Network Statement .............................................. 17 1.8 Contacts ........................................................................................................................................... 17 1.9 Rail Freight Corridors ...................................................................................................................... 18 1.10 RailNetEurope ................................................................................................................................. 18 1.10.1 One Stop Shop - OSS ................................................................................................................... 19 1.10.2 RNE tools ..................................................................................................................................... 19 2. CONDITIONS FOR ACCESS TO AND USE OF RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE ............................. 20 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 20 2.2 General access requirements ........................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Requirements for the submission of requests for train path allocation ........................................... 20 2.2.2 Entities permitted to provide railway transport services ................................................................ 20 2.2.3 Transport License ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.4 Safety Certificates .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.5 Cover for Civil Liability (Insurance) .............................................................................................. 22 2.3 General Terms and Conditions of Business..................................................................................... 22 2.3.1 Contract for Use of Public Railway Infrastructure ......................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Framework Agreement ................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Operating Rules ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.5 Transport of Special Loads .............................................................................................................. 23 2.6 Transport of Dangerous Goods ........................................................................................................ 24 2.7 Rolling Stock Acceptance Procedure .............................................................................................. 24 2.8 Acceptance Procedure for Railway Undertaking’s staff ................................................................. 24 3. OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AVAILABLE RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE AND RESTRICTIONS TO ITS USE ..................................................... 25 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Network Size ................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 Borders ........................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.2 Network Connections ..................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Description of railway network ....................................................................................................... 27 3.3.1 Geographic data .............................................................................................................................. 27 3.3.2 The characteristics of the railway infrastructure ............................................................................ 29 3.3.3 The traffic control (regulation) and communication equipment and systems ................................ 32 3.4 Traffic restrictions ........................................................................................................................... 35 3.4.1 Specialised Infrastructure ............................................................................................................... 35 3.4.2 Environmental restrictions .............................................................................................................. 35 3.4.3 Dangerous goods ............................................................................................................................ 35 4 Network Statement 2020 3.4.4 Tunnel restrictions .......................................................................................................................... 36 3.4.5 Bridge restrictions .......................................................................................................................... 36 3.4.6 Restrictions in traffic organization and compiling of paths ............................................................ 37 3.5 Availability of the railway infrastructure
Recommended publications
  • Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944
    Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 edited by: Sanela Schmid Milovan Pisarri Tomislav Dulić Zoran Janjetović Milan Koljanin Milovan Pisarri Thomas Porena Sabine Rutar Sanela Schmid 1 Project partners: Project supported by: Forced Labour in Serbia 2 Producers, Consumers and Consequences . of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 This collection of scientific papers on forced labour during the Second World War is part of a wider research within the project "Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour - Serbia 1941-1944", which was implemented by the Center for Holocaust Research and Education from Belgrade in partnership with Humboldt University, Berlin and supported by the Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future" in Germany. ("Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft" - EVZ). 3 Impressum Forced Labour in Serbia Producers, Consumers and Consequences of Forced Labour 1941-1944 Published by: Center for Holocaust Research and Education Publisher: Nikola Radić Editors: Sanela Schmid and Milovan Pisarri Authors: Tomislav Dulić Zoran Janjetović Milan Koljanin Milovan Pisarri Thomas Porena Sabine Rutar Sanela Schmid Proofreading: Marija Šapić, Marc Brogan English translation: Irena Žnidaršić-Trbojević German translation: Jovana Ivanović Graphic design: Nikola Radić Belgrade, 2018. Project partners: Center for Holocaust Research and Education Humboldt University Berlin Project is supported by: „Remembrance, Responsibility And Future“ Foundation „Stiftung Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft“ - EVZ Forced Labour in Serbia 4 Producers, Consumers and Consequences . of Forced Labour 1941 - 1944 Contents 6 Introduction - Sanela Schmid and Milovan Pisarri 12 Milovan Pisarri “I Saw Jews Carrying Dead Bodies On Stretchers”: Forced Labour and The Holocaust in Occupied Serbia 30 Zoran Janjetović Forced Labour in Banat Under Occupation 1941 - 1944 44 Milan Koljanin Camps as a Source of Forced Labour in Serbia 1941 - 1944 54 Photographs 1 62 Sabine Rutar Physical Labour and Survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Towns in Serbia – the “Bridge” Between the Urban and the Rural
    Europ. Countrys. · 4· 2016 · p. 462-480 DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0031 European Countryside MENDELU SMALL TOWNS IN SERBIA – THE “BRIDGE” BETWEEN THE URBAN AND THE RURAL Marko Filipović, Vlasta Kokotović Kanazir, Marija Drobnjaković1 1 MSc Filipović Marko, ResearchAssociate MSc, Kokotović Kanazir Vlasta Research Associate, MSc Drobnjaković Marija (corresponding author) ResearchAssociate Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, Belgrade; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 462/480 Received 16 April 2016; Accepted 19 July 2016 Abstract: The study presented in this paper deals with the definition and role of small towns in the spatial development of the Republic of Serbia. An analysis of the profiles of small towns was performed and they were compared based on their spatial and population characteristics. The aim of this study is to determine the role of small towns in the development of settlement networks and the balanced population development of a country as a whole by identifying their specific features and establishing a ranking of their importance in local and regional contexts. Key words: urban settlement, small town, role, Serbia Abstrakt: Istraživanje u ovom radu odnosi se na problematiku malih gradova, njihovog definisanja i uloge u prostornom razvoju Republike Srbije. Izvršena je analiza I komparacija profila malih gradova kroz njihove prostorne i demografske karakteristike. Cilj rada je da odredi ulogu malih gradova u razvoju mreže naselja, kao i uravnoteženom populacionom razvoju zemlje, kroz sagledavanje njihovih specifičnosti i gradaciju značaja u lokalnim I regionalnim okvirima. Ključne reči: gradska naselja, mali gradovi, uloga, Srbija 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POSSIBILITIES and CHANCES of the PROJECT ENERGY COMPLEX KOVIN — NEW COAL MINE and POWER PLANT 1. Introduction 2. General P
    Górnictwo i Geoinżynieria • Rok 35 • Zeszyt 3 • 2011 Milan Radunović*, Obrad Kecman*, Tanja Mihajlović*, Jörg Schlenstedt**, Peter Denke**, Dusan Djuric*** THE POSSIBILITIES AND CHANCES OF THE PROJECT ENERGY COMPLEX KOVIN ⎯ NEW COAL MINE AND POWER PLANT 1. Introduction The first geological studies in Kovinski basin started in 1976 to 1979. The results of these studies showed the presence of interesting economic coal beds. Coal is of such quality that can be used in thermal power plants. The entire studies took place in stages that are aimed at determining the quantity and quality of coal required to open the power plant. Due to the specific areas and great influence of underground water, the experimental test pit was opened on the banks of the Danube. In this pit method that was used is underwater mining of coal, and this method proved to be an alternative to dry mine Kostolac the other side of the Danube. Due to the specific conditions in the protected part of the deposit fields A and B, were considered two types of mining coal: dry open pit mining and underwater. 2. General part 2.1. Geographical location In geographical terms Kovin coal deposit is situated about 50 km east of Belgrade, in the municipality of Kovin, in the villages Malo Bavanište i Beli Breg and it is bounded by the Danube on south, line Dubovac-Gaj on north, Deliblato- delta river V. Morava to the west and village Gaj to the east. * Energy Consulting and Engineering, Novi Sad, Serbia ** LMBV International, Senftenberg, Germany *** Insitut Jaroslav Černi, Beograd, Serbia 291 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact of Ambient Air Pollution in Serbia a CALL to ACTION
    Health impact of ambient air pollution in Serbia A CALL TO ACTION РЕПУБЛИКА СРБИJA Министарство заштите животне средине REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Ministry of Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia MINISTRY OF HEALTH Abstract This report, on a comprehensive investigation on the impact of air quality on health in Serbia, assesses the effects of air pollution on health in major cities. The results show that long-term exposure to air pollution leads to premature death for a relevant percentage of the population, and short-term exposure to air pollution increases mortality risk. The investigation collected data on air quality, the population and its health in 2010–2015. Levels of pollutants exceeding the values of the WHO air quality guidelines and the limits set by European Union legislation on air quality were recorded in several Serbian cities. The WHO AirQ+ software was used to calculate the proportion of deaths due to air pollution for the main Serbian cities. The analysis of the national data shows that nearly 3600 premature deaths every year are attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter measuring ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5) in 11 studied cities in Serbia. Simulations of progressive reductions in current PM2.5 concentrations point towards major health benefits from improving air quality in the country. The results of this analysis indicate the importance of a reliable monitoring of air quality and the need for interventions to reduce the burden of air pollution in Serbia. Keywords AIR POLLUTION EXPOSURE HEALTH IMPACTS URBAN HEALTH SERBIA Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • I Selekcija – Rezultati – Bilten Finala Pgl Srbije Žsg 2019
    GIMNASTIČKI SAVEZ SRBIJE SOKOLSKO DRUŠTVO “VOJVODINA” NOVI SAD BILTEN FINALE PIONISRSKE GIMNASTIČKE LIGE ŽENSKA SPORTSKA GIMNASTIKA I SELEKCIJA NOVI SAD , 16 . 11 .2019. FINALE PGL SRBIJE ŽSG 2019 NOVI SAD 16.11.2019. I SELEKCIJA Rezultati ekipno 1. GK"Beograd" 159,591 Ime Klub Ukupno Božović Nina GK"Beograd" 14,325 13,700 10,950 13,066 52,041 Maksić Una GK"Beograd" 13,950 13,550 27,500 Mihajlović Lana GK"Beograd" 13,925 13,200 12,450 11,966 51,541 Valdevit Minja GK"Beograd" 14,700 14,400 12,600 13,600 55,300 Velebit Janja GK"Beograd" 9,100 12,300 21,400 42,975 41,650 36,000 38,966 159,591 2. SD"Spartak" Subotica 156,741 Ime Klub Ukupno Basarić Tamara SD"Spartak" Subotica 14,100 11,850 12,675 13,233 51,858 Prčić Laura SD"Spartak" Subotica 13,500 12,630 12,825 12,266 51,221 Prčić Leona SD"Spartak" Subotica 13,950 13,850 11,000 12,333 51,133 Tomanović Lena SD"Spartak" Subotica 13,875 13,370 10,400 12,900 50,545 41,925 39,850 36,500 38,466 156,741 3. GK"DIF" Beograd 154,251 Ime Klub Ukupno Rašković Ina GK"DIF" Beograd 13,650 12,930 12,000 12,766 51,346 Stanimirović Dunja GK"DIF" Beograd 13,975 13,100 12,300 13,100 52,475 Vasiljević Tara GK"DIF" Beograd 13,625 11,880 12,125 12,800 50,430 41,250 37,910 36,425 38,666 154,251 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Organisation of the Republic of Serbia – Possibilities for Reform
    S A J _ 2015 _ 7 _ original scientific article approval date 30 10 2015 UDK BROJEVI: 342.25(497.11) 352.07(497.11) COBISS.SR-ID 221846796 TERRITORIAL ORGANISATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA – POSSIBILITIES FOR REFORM A B S T R A C T Current territorial organisation in Serbia was basically set during the 1960s. Great demographic and economic changes were not reflected in changes of legislation on territorial organisation. Such territorial organisation is a basis for a single-level and almost completely monotype local self-government system. After providing a detailed overview of legislation on territorial organisation and local self-government in the previous two centuries, the authors analyse the current system and attempt to outline possible lines of reform of territorial organisation. These proposals are viewed as a part of efforts towards greater decentralisation and establishment of a multi-level and/or polytype local self-government. Bogoljub Milosavljević KEY WORDS 401 Jelena Jerinić Union University Law School TERRITORIAL ORGANISATION LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENTS MUNICIPALITIES TOWNS DECENTRALISATION S A J _ 2015 _ 7 _ INTRODUCTORY REMARKS One of the significant issues which appeared during the work on the survey European Mayors – Political Leaders in European Cities, conducted in 20141 was the possibility of territorial changes, i.e. changes in the number of existing towns and municipalities, as well as strengthening inter-municipal cooperation. Since the problems of territorial organisation are in close relationship with the actual topic of decentralisation, this article focuses on them, while questions of inter-municipal cooperation are left for another appropriate occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Pow Er Industry of Serbia
    TECHNICAL REPORT ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY OF SERBIA 2017 EPS INSTALLED CAPACITIES 1 ZRENJANIN NOVI SAD KOSTOLAC B3 S. MITROVICA KOSTOLAC A ĐERDAP 1 2 KOSTOLAC B N. TESLA B N. TESLA А KOSTOLAC ZVORNIK 5 ĐERDAP 2 MORAVA KOLUBARA А KOLUBARA B KOLUBARA B. BAŠTA MEĐUVRŠJE PSHPP B. BAŠTA OVČAR BANJA KOKIN BROD 3 BISTRICA POTPEĆ UVAC 4 PIROT VRLA 2 VRLA 4 VRLA 1 KOSOVO B VRLA 3 KOSOVO А PSP LISINA * KOSOVO = 500 MW Power plants and coal mines: Distribution areas: TPP 1_Novi Sad TPP UNDER CONSTRUCTION 2_Beograd TPP potentially place 3_Kraljevo CHP 4_Niš HPP 5_Kragujevac COAL MINE *_PE Elektrokosmet, Priština * As of June 1999, EPS does not operate its facilities on the territory of Kosovo and Metohija EPS 2017 Data related to capacities managed by Public Enterprise Electric Power Industry of Serbia GENERATION CAPACITIES Net output capacity 7,355 MW ELECTRICITY GENERATION 34,004 GWh COAL PRODUCTION 39,064,457 t 2017 EPS OVERBURDEN REMOVAL 103,429,947 bcm ELECTRICITY SALE 35,474 GWh In EPS Group 33,533 GWh Out of EPS Group 1,941 GWh ELECTRICITY PURCHASE Out of EPS Group 1,492 GWh NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS Total 3,477,716 Guaranteed supply 3,446,386 Last resort supply 1,454 Commercial supply 29,876 GENERATION CAPACITIES Net output POWER PLANT capacity MW TPP Nikola Tesla A 1,597 TPP Nikola Tesla B 1,220 TPP Kolubara 216 CAPACITIES TPP Morava 108 TPP Kostolac A 281 TPP Kostolac B 632 THERMAL Power Plants 4,054 CHP Novi Sad 208 CHP Zrenjanin 100 CHP Sremska Mitrovica 28 COMBINED Heat and Power Plants 336 HPP Đerdap 1 1,099 HPP Đerdap 2 270 Vlasina HPPs 129
    [Show full text]
  • Roma in the Republic of Serbia: the Challenges of Discrimination Goran Bašić Portrait of a Roma Family in Pancevo, Serbia
    report Roma in the Republic of Serbia: The Challenges of Discrimination Goran Bašić Portrait of a Roma family in Pancevo, Serbia. Jerome Cid / Alamy Acknowledgements Minority Rights Group Europe (MRGE) This report was funded by the European Union’s Rights, Minority Rights Group Europe (MRGE) is registered as a not Equality and Citizenship Programme (2014-2020). The for profit company under Hungarian Law. Based in Budapest content of this report represents the views of the author only since 1996, Minority Rights Group Europe is the European and is his sole responsibility. The European Commission regional partner of Minority Rights Group International does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made (MRGI), with the aim of promoting and protecting the rights of the information it contains. of minorities and indigenous peoples across Europe and Central Asia. MRG Europe does this through capacity building, international advocacy, media advocacy and networking. About Praxis About the author Praxis is a national non-governmental organization Goran Bašić has dedicated his work to researching the established in 2004 in Belgrade that protects human rights phenomenon of multiculturalism and ethnicity. He is the by providing legal protection and advocating for elimination author of several monographs and numerous works on of systemic obstacles in access to rights. interethnic relations and the status of national minorities, especially the Roma, in Southeast and Central Europe. Praxis acts in the area of status and socioeconomic rights, He received his PhD at the Faculty of Political Sciences in antidiscrimination, gender equality, migration, child rights and Belgrade at the Department of Political Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Ukraine Slovakia Hungary Federal Republic
    COURSE OF CYANIDE SPILL THROUGH S/E EUROPEAN RIVERS (DANUBE BASIN) (Lapos, Szamos,Tisza, Danube)* UMAN NOVOARKHANGELSK DOMBRAD KAMENETSPOLOLSKIY 4 February 8.0 mg/l LONYA SLOVAKIA Aggteleki 3 February BALSA UKRAINE TISZALOK 13.5 mg/l 5 February 8am BERSHAD 5 February 12pm 12.4 mg/l VASAROSNAMENY 3.7 mg/l LONYA Tallyai DOMBRAD 3 February 4am UNEP Patocshegy BALSA 12.5 mg/l CHERNOVTSY Pervomaysk 48˚ MISKOLC KISVARDA T ARBUZINKA Megyaszoi BUJ VASAROSNAMENY i za tatorjanos sza T is BALTA Bukki NYIREGYHAZA TISZALOK FEHERGYARMAT VRADIYEVKA TUNYOGMATOLCS Velikiy Bychkov RYSHKANY Dan ube Sz TISZAKESZI TISZAVASVARI am TUNYOGMATOLCS o KOTOVSK 7 February s SIGHETU ANANYEV POLGAR 2 February 4pm CSENGER SATU MARE POSSIBLE 3.0 mg/l TISZAKESZI Ujszentmargitai erdo 18.0 mg/l ORIGIN OF MARMATIEI POROSZLO SPILL EGYEK BELTSY VOZNESENSK BUDAPEST Erdotelki arboretum Fenyi erdo DOLINSKOYE TISZANANA Ohati Hortobagy SATU MARE erdo s L o BAIA MARE DEBRECEN a KISKORE KISKORE 1 February 11am ERD p TISZAFURED m 8 February 8am CSENGER 7.8 mg/l a o MOLDOVA Lake z Vajdalaposi erdo s Slatiora 3.9 mg/l Tisza 1 February 12pm S LAPOS RIVER Kecskeri puszta 18.0 mg/l SZOLNOK za 31 January 2pm Poiana Stampei Peatbog (Tinovul Mare) is 9 February 8am T 19.16 mg/l DUBOSSARY IASI 2.2 mg/l 47˚ Calimani Kostuleny SZOLNOK KENGYEL KISHINEV Balaton Crisul Repede Gorges KECSKEMET ORADEA Kiskunsagi Ceahlau PIATRANEAMT CSONGRAD ROMAN 10 February 8am BEKES CSONGRAD BENDERY HUNGARY 2.4 mg/l Pusztaszeri Hetvezer Cheile Bicazului-Hasmas Emlekmu Volgamenti herics BEKESCSABA Pusztakocsi Fulopszek
    [Show full text]
  • Awake the Danube
    AWAKE THE DANUBE AWAKE THE DANUBE / 1 THE DANUBE IN SERBIA / THE GIANT THAT AWAKENS The Danube is, after the Volga, the second longest and richest in water river in Europe. However, it was not the Romans who first discovered the Danube treasury. Numerous sites Throughout history, it has been the lifeblood which divided two great empires, and today it of Vinca culture, which flourished from VI to III millennium BC, inscribe our Danube shores is the most beautiful and naturally endowed bridge that connects countries and peoples. on the pages of world history about the oldest developed cultures and civilisations. This magnificent river springs at the foot of the Black Forest, from where it flows east and The Greeks also left a mark on the Danube shores, and many eastern nations used exactly after almost 3,000 kilometres it creates a delta in Romania and Ukraine, which thanks to its its valleys as a gate to enter European soil. Among them are Vandals, Visigoths, Huns, Avars beauty is on UNESCO World Heritage list! During its eternal journey, the Danube enriches and Slavs. ten countries with its flow, and as many as four capitals are comfortably situated on its shores – Budapest, Vienna, Bratislava and, of course, our beautiful Belgrade! The Danube was of exceptional, sometimes crucial importance during the Turkish conquest of Southeastern Europe – army, equipment and supplies were transported by this mighty river. The name of this longest river in the European Union originates from the Latin language – the name is derived from the word Danubius, which was the name of the ancient Roman Today, sailing through its valley in Serbia, the remains of as many as seven fortresses can be river god.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignitic Fly Ash Byproducts from TPP Kostolac-B, Serbia and Its Usage
    Lignitic Fly Ash Byproducts from TPP Kostolac-B, Serbia And Its Usage Rudolf TOMANEC 1), Milica STEFANOVIC 2), Vladimír ČABLÍK 3) _________________________ 1) Prof. Dr.; Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade; 7, Djusina str., 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; e-mail: [email protected], tel.: (+381) (11) 3237 322; 2) Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade; 7, Djusina str., 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3) doc. Ing., Ph.D.; Institute of Clean Technologies for Mining and Utilization of Raw Materials for Energy Use, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava; 17.listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected], tel.: (+420) 597 324 040 Summary In this study, the fly ash taken from the lignite thermal power plant Kostolac-B, Kostolac, Serbia, is characterized and separated from its byproducts. Fly ash is composed of unburned carbon, iron compounds tipically of magnetite, pozzolanic material and cenospheres. A systematic study is conducted to establish the optimum conditions for the separation of these materials from fly ash. In this context, concentration techniques such as magnetic, gravity separations (heavy liquids separation) and flotation are put forward. Finally the lightweight fraction, from which the magnetic minerals and the unburned coal substance were removed, as well as microspheres, is an excellent material for the production of building materials – blocks and bricks, for concrete mixtures, cement additives, for fly ash pelletization process using Portland cement binder and other purposes. The main elements (fractions of valuable components) of the fly ash that determine its usability are: the quantity of unburned carbon, content of iron compounds (typically of magnetite and haematite), the pozzolanic material, microsphere (cenospheres) content, size distribution, mechanical properties of the pellets etc.
    [Show full text]