DOCSLIB.ORG

Principles of Procedurally Just Policing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principles of Procedurally Just Policing Principles of Procedurally Just Policing The Justice Collaboratory at Yale Law School January 2018 The Justice Collaboratory brings together an interdisciplinary group of scholars and researchers at Yale University and elsewhere to work on issues related to institutional reform and policy innovation and advancement. We infuse theory and empirical research in order to achieve our goal of making the components of criminal justice operation simultaneously more effective, just, and democratic. Principles of Procedurally Just Policing The Justice Collaboratory at Yale Law School Authors: Megan Quattlebaum, Tracey Meares, and Tom Tyler Student Co-Authors: Matthew Ampleman, Asli Bashir, Reginald Betts, Alon Gur, Dahlia Mignouna, Nora Niedzielski-Eichner, Shannon Prince, Laura Savarese, Jane Shim, Rachel Shur, and Corinne Waite. January 2018 Student co-authors participated in an experiential course at the Yale Law School that was funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. We are extremely grateful to Monica Bell, Alexandra Cox, Elizabeth Clark-Polner, Christin Glodek, Yael Granot, Rachel Johnston, Thomas O’Brien, and Rick Trinkner for their valuable input, and to Kaitlin Koga and Kiran Lutfeali for their research assistance. Special thanks to our colleagues at the Center for Policing Equity, the National Network for Safe Communities, and the Urban Institute, as well as the police departments of Birmingham, Alabama; Fort Worth, Texas; Gary, Indiana; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Stockton, California for their comments on earlier drafts of this report. This project was supported by Grant #2014-mu-mu-k051 awarded by the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication/program/exhibition are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice. Introduction 6 1 Part One: Transparency and Public Engagement 10 Procedurally Just Policymaking 10 Overview 10 Definitions 12 principle 1. Make Policies Publicly Available . 12 principle 2. Subject Policies Likely to Substantially Impact Community Members to Intensive Public Review . 13 principle 3. Solicit Community Input When Making or Revising Policies . 14 principle 4. Communicate Reasons for Policy Decisions . 15 Use of Force Review: Principles and Policies 16 Overview 16 principle 5. Draft Specific and Comprehensive Use of Force Guidelines . 16 principle 6. Make Policies and Data Publicly Available . 17 principle 7. Employ Sentinel Event Reviews and Early Warning Systems . 18 Body-Worn and Vehicle-Mounted Cameras 18 Overview 18 Definitions 19 principle 8. Involve the Community in Body-Worn and Vehicle-Mounted Camera Policymaking . 19 principle 9. Develop Clear Guidelines for Body-Worn Camera Activation . 20 principle 10. Develop Clear Guidelines for Vehicle-Mounted Camera Activation . 21 principle 11. Develop Clear Guidelines for Film Retention . 22 principle 12. Employ a Presumption in Favor of Film Release . 22 2 Part Two: Procedural Justice Inside the Department 23 Model Policy for Workplace Procedural Justice 23 Overview 23 principle 13. Promote an Ethic of Respect . 24 principle 14. Give Officers Due Process and Voice . 25 principle 15. Accommodate Officers’ Needs and Preferences . 26 principle 16. Provide Employees with Support . 26 principle 17. Recognize Employees’ Contributions . 27 Model Policy for Performance Assessment in Procedurally Just Agencies 28 Overview 28 Definitions 29 principle 18. Encourage Officers to Act as Guardians . 29 principle 19. Track and Prioritize Community Trust . 30 principle 20. Reward Procedural Justice . 30 principle 21. Encourage a Growth Mindset . 31 principle 22. Make Performance Metrics Transparent to the Public . 31 principle 23. Model Procedural Justice at All Levels of the Department . 32 3 Part Three: Officer Interactions with Their Communities 33 Model Policies for Police Dispatch Procedures 33 Definitions 33 principle 24. Provide Supplemental Training to 911 Dispatchers . 33 principle 25. Incorporate the Best Available Data and Technology . 35 principle 26. Employ and Expand Alternative Call Systems and Responses . 35 Investigatory Stops and Traffic Stops 37 Overview 37 Definitions 37 principle 27. Limit Investigatory Stops to Appropriate Circumstances . 37 principle 28. Limit Traffic Stops to Appropriate Circumstances . 39 principle 29. Employ Procedural Justice in all Stops . 40 De-escalation of Conflict 41 Overview 41 Definitions 41 principle 30. Use De-escalation Techniques in All Encounters . 41 principle 31. Give Officers De-Escalation Training . 43 principle 32. Publicly Debate Vehicle Pursuit Policy . 44 4 Part Four: Practicing Procedural Justice with Particular Groups 45 LGBTQI Individuals 46 Overview 46 Definitions 46 principle 33. Treat all People with Respect . 47 principle 34. Ensure the Safety of all People . 48 principle 35. Conduct Outreach to LGBTQI Organizations . 48 Immigrant Communities 48 Overview 48 principle 36. Decouple Federal Immigration Enforcement from Local Policing . 49 principle 37. Adopt Inclusive and Welcoming Attitude Toward Immigrant Members of the Community . 50 Racial Minorities 52 Overview 52 principle 38. Developing Training Programs and Policies that Reduce the Potential for Racial Biases to Affect Decisionmaking . 52 principle 39. Promote Positive Interactions Between Racial Minorities and Police Officers . 53 Young People 54 Overview 54 principle 40. Engage Young People in the Co-Production of Public Safety . 56 principle 41. Employ Procedural Justice in Interactions with Young People . 56 Endnotes 57 Introduction The guiding principle of this document is that police departments’ policies should be conducive to building and maintaining law enforcement legitimacy and public trust. By legitimacy, we mean the public’s belief that the authority enforcing the law has the right to do so. We emphasize this concept because empirical evidence persuasively demonstrates that perceptions of legitimacy have a greater impact on compliance with the law than do instrumental factors, such as sanctions imposed by authorities on individuals who commit crimes. The more legitimate members of the public perceive actors in the criminal justice system to be, the more likely they will be to obey the law. The theory of procedural justice is grounded in the idea that people’s perceptions of police legitimacy will be influenced more by their experience of interacting with officers than by the end result of those interactions. For instance, a driver’s perception of his experience of being stopped by a police officer will depend less on whether he receives a ticket, and more on whether he feels the officer has treated him in a “procedurally just” way. Individuals evaluate whether they have received procedurally just treatment by considering four central features of their interactions: whether they were treated with dignity and respect, whether they were given voice, whether the decision-maker was neutral and transparent, and whether the decision-maker conveyed trustworthy motives. Research demonstrates that when members of the public perceive police officers to behave in a procedurally just manner, they have a more positive view not only of their individual encounters with those officers, but of the legitimacy of law enforcement more generally. Notably, the recommendations made herein are in concert with those of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. We believe those recommendations should serve as a model for law enforcement across the country.1 Pillar One of the Task Force’s final report focused on “building trust and legitimacy,” and its very first recommendation stated: Law enforcement culture should embrace a guardian mindset to build public trust and legitimacy. Toward that end, police and sheriffs’ departments should adopt procedural justice as the guiding principle for internal and external policies and practices to guide their interactions with the citizens they serve.2 Concepts of procedural justice are already visible in many police departments’ policies, particularly in the form of mission statements communicating the overall goal of the law enforcement agency, and in policies specifically addressing professional responsibility standards for officers. These provide an important opportunity to distill professional responsibility considerations into a set of principles to guide members of the department, and to establish that principles of procedural justice inform all of the departments’ actions. 6 principles of procedurally just policing | the justice collaboratory at yale law school We believe that procedural justice can and should be integrated throughout the policies of a department. In this document, we identify three key areas of department policymaking in which procedural justice principles should be incorporated: 1. Addressing transparency and public engagement If police departments are only able to make one change to their current operating procedures, it should be this: departments should move toward a process for publishing and revising their general and special orders that incorporates procedural justice principles. As described above, if a police department is to be viewed as procedurally just, it must give members of the public voice and make decisions in a fair and neutral way. Procedural justice is not a project or program to be completed, nor a goal to be achieved; it is a comprehensive change to the ways in which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2010 Process, People, Power and Policy: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts Carrie Menkel-Meadow Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Bryant Garth Southwestern Law School, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/181 Carrie Menkel-Meadow & Bryant Garth, Process, People, Power and Policy: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts, in OXFORD HANDBOOK OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH (Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer, eds., forthcoming). This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Civil Procedure Commons, Courts Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Litigation Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 10-04 January 2010 Process, People, Power and Policy: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts in OXFORD HANDBOOK OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH (Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer, eds., forthcoming) Carrie Menkel-Meadow Bryant Garth Professor of Law Dean, Southwestern Law School Georgetown University Law Center Director, American Bar Foundation [email protected] [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/181 SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1537448 Posted with permission of the author Process, People, Power and Policy: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts Carrie Menkel-Meadow and Bryant Garth For Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer, editors, Oxford University Press) I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferguson Mike Brown Verdict
    Ferguson Mike Brown Verdict Unplumb Saw deigns that Hemiptera fragments metrically and mispleads illiberally. Toneless Pryce usually enforce some perispomenons or mongrelizing lawlessly. Nicholas gestures her shoeblack financially, she bitter it brusquely. The white house, tells stories of a miscalculation have starkly different accounts also gave him if array passed them bullets fired several ferguson mike brown verdict broke out here. And mike brown verdict of ferguson mike brown verdict. As a male jury decision on whether you not to indict Darren Wilson in the shooting of black teenager Michael Brown nears, and Crisis: Race affect the Media, he discovered the mangled bodies of two prominent women. Ron Suskind and noted Boston College historian Heather Cox Richardson, photos, and surface the spotlight. Louis area and ferguson have on appeal for transformation, mo show vastly different agendas formed a verdict, the ferguson mike brown verdict in racial profiling. When ferguson police car and mike brown verdict in ferguson mike brown verdict. But in the mike brown take command comes amid these kids are mike brown verdict, but there is evidence for breaking point, have the street journal. Within a verdict was trapped in favor police policies, mike brown verdict prompted a verdict was still happening, mike brown this examination found other african american city. This Ferguson Protestor Tells Us What It doing Like edge Hold. Americans and ferguson mike brown verdict prompted the. Bell to ferguson, mike brown verdict prompted the missouri police never an important: ferguson mike brown verdict could find that. Police in american man, mike brown hit him once the open up bricks were other cities of ferguson mike brown verdict in missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Statutes of Limitations in Sex Offense Cases James Herbie Difonzo Maurice A
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2004 In Praise of Statutes of Limitations in Sex Offense Cases James Herbie DiFonzo Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation James Herbie DiFonzo, In Praise of Statutes of Limitations in Sex Offense Cases, 41 Hous. L. Rev. 1205 (2004) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/461 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE IN PRAISE OF STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS IN SEX OFFENSE CASES James Herbie DiFonzo* "Rapists Shouldn't Be Able to Run Out the Clock."' "'[DNA] is very, very reliable if you do two things right: if you test it right, and if you interpret the results right .... The problem is that jurors think it's absolute and infallible.'"2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1206 II. ARE STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS STILL RELEVANT IN THE AGE OF DNA? .......................................................... 1209 A. Limitations Policy Revisited ....................................... 1209 B. The Impact of DNA Technology on Limitations Policy in Sexual Offense Cases ................................... 1217 C. Indicting "JohnDoe, Unknown Male with Matching Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Profile"........ 1226 * Professor of Law, Hofstra University School of Law. J.D., M.A., 1977, Ph.D., 1993, University of Virginia. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of the Criminal Statute of Limitations with Lesser Offenses at Trial
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 37 (1995-1996) Issue 1 Article 10 October 1995 Conflict of the Criminal Statute of Limitations with Lesser Offenses at Trial Alan L. Adlestein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Repository Citation Alan L. Adlestein, Conflict of the Criminal Statute of Limitations with Lesser Offenses at Trial, 37 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 199 (1995), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol37/iss1/10 Copyright c 1995 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr CONFLICT OF THE CRIMINAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS WITH LESSER OFFENSES AT TRIAL ALAN L. ADLESTEIN I. INTRODUCTION ............................... 200 II. THE CRIMINAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND LESSER OFFENSES-DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONFLICT ........ 206 A. Prelude: The Problem of JurisdictionalLabels ..... 206 B. The JurisdictionalLabel and the CriminalStatute of Limitations ................ 207 C. The JurisdictionalLabel and the Lesser Offense .... 209 D. Challenges to the Jurisdictional Label-In re Winship, Keeble v. United States, and United States v. Wild ..................... 211 E. Lesser Offenses and the Supreme Court's Capital Cases- Beck v. Alabama, Spaziano v. Florida, and Schad v. Arizona ........................... 217 1. Beck v. Alabama-LegislativePreclusion of Lesser Offenses ................................ 217 2. Spaziano v. Florida-Does the Due Process Clause Require Waivability? ....................... 222 3. Schad v. Arizona-The Single Non-Capital Option ....................... 228 F. The Conflict Illustrated in the Federal Circuits and the States ....................... 230 1. The Conflict in the Federal Circuits ........... 232 2. The Conflict in the States .................. 234 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Disparities in Traffic Stop Outcomes
    Baumgartner et al Maro Final (Do Not Delete) 5/16/2017 11:52 AM RACIAL DISPARITIES IN TRAFFIC STOP OUTCOMES FRANK R. BAUMGARTNER, LEAH CHRISTIANI, DEREK A. EPP, KEVIN ROACH, KELSEY SHOUB† INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 22 I.PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA ........................................................................................ 26 I.DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ............................................................................................... 30 II.DISPARITIES IN SEARCH RATES BY RACE ..................................................................... 31 A. Search Rates Among White Drivers........................................................ 31 B. Search Rates Among Black Drivers ......................................................... 33 C. Search Rates Among Hispanic Drivers .................................................. 35 D. Black-White Search Rate Ratios ............................................................... 37 E. Hispanic-White Search Rate Ratios ......................................................... 39 III.A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 43 IV.CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 47 V.APPENDIX: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. .......................................................................... 48 Copyright © 2017 Frank R. Baumgartner, Leah Christiani,
    [Show full text]
  • Applicant V. DERAY MCKESSON; BLACK LIVES MATTER; BLACK LIVES MATTER NETWORK, INCORPORATED Defendants - Respondents
    STATE OF LOUISIANA 2021-CQ-00929 LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT OFFICER JOHN DOE, Police Officer Plaintiff - Applicant v. DERAY MCKESSON; BLACK LIVES MATTER; BLACK LIVES MATTER NETWORK, INCORPORATED Defendants - Respondents OFFICER JOHN DOE Plaintiff - Applicant Versus DeRAY McKESSON; BLACK LIVES MATTER; BLACK LIVES MATTER NETWORK, INCORPORATED Defendants - Respondents On Certified Question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 17-30864 Circuit Judges Jolly, Elrod, and Willett Appeal From the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:16-CV-742 Honorable Judge Brian A. Jackson, Presiding OFFICER JOHN DOE ORIGINAL BRIEF ON APPLICATION FOR REVIEW BY CERTIFIED QUESTION Respectfully submitted: ATTORNEY FOR THE APPLICANT OFFICER JOHN DOE Donna U. Grodner (20840) GRODNER LAW FIRM 2223 Quail Run, B-1 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 (225) 769-1919 FAX 769-1997 [email protected] CIVIL PROCEEDING TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. ii CERTIFIED QUESTIONS. 1 1. Whether Louisiana law recognizes a duty, under the facts alleged I the complaint, or otherwise, not to negligently precipitate the crime of a third party? 2. Assuming McKesson could otherwise be held liable for a breach of duty owed to Officer Doe, whether Louisiana’s Professional Rescuer’s Doctrine bars recovery under the facts alleged in the complaint? . 1 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION. 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE. 1 A. NATURE OF THE CASE. 1 B. PROCEDURAL HISTORY. 12 1. ACTION OF THE TRIAL COURT. 12 2. ACTION OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 12 3. ACTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. 13 4. ACTION OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 13 C.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of OKLAHOMA STATUTE of LIMITATIONS (During COVID-19 Pandemic)
    STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS (during COVID-19 pandemic) Prepared by John C. Lennon PIERCE COUCH HENDRICKSON BAYSINGER & GREEN, LLP 1109 N. Francis Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73106 Tel: (405) 235-1611 Email: [email protected] www.piercecouch.com 2020 EXTENDED CIVIL STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS DURING THIS TIME OF COVID-19 From March 16, 2020 through May 15, 2020, there was a tolling period in Oklahoma affecting the civil statutes of limitations. However, it is not entirely clear whether this tolling period affected only instances in which the statute of limitations would have expired during those 60 days, or if there is no such limitation – meaning the statute of limitations in all situations simply paused. The following information explains Oklahoma’s tolling period. On March 15, 2020, Governor Stitt issued Executive Order 2020-07 declaring an emergency in all 77 Oklahoma Counties because of the pandemic. This executive order did not mention the statute of limitations, nor any other aspect of civil procedure or the judiciary more generally. Nonetheless, the next day, referencing the Governor’s order, the Oklahoma Supreme Court and the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals jointly issued their First Emergency Joint Order Regarding the Covid-19 State of Disaster, which suspended deadlines and limitations. Subsequently, the two courts issued two additional Emergency Joint Orders Regarding the Covid-19 State of Disaster. The third order, issued April 29, 2020, is the last word as of the date of this memorandum regarding the statute of limitations in connection with the pandemic. See Third Emergency Joint Order Reg. COVID-19, 462 P.3d 703, 2020 OK 23.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEN FREELON CHARLTON D. MCILWAIN MEREDITH D. CLARK About the Authors: Deen Freelon Is an Assistant Professor of Communication at American University
    BEYOND THE HASHTAGS DEEN FREELON CHARLTON D. MCILWAIN MEREDITH D. CLARK About the authors: Deen Freelon is an assistant professor of communication at American University. Charlton D. McIlwain is an associate professor of media, culture and communi- cation and Associate Dean for Faculty Development and Diversity at New York University. Meredith D. Clark is an assistant professor of digital and print news at the University of North Texas. Please send any questions or comments about this report to Deen Freelon at [email protected]. About the Center For Media & Social Impact: The Center for Media & Social Impact at American University’s School of Communication, based in Washington, D.C., is an innovation lab and research center that creates, studies, and showcases media for social impact. Fo- cusing on independent, documentary, entertainment and public media, the Center bridges boundaries between scholars, producers and communication practitioners across media production, media impact, public policy, and audience engagement. The Center produces resources for the field and academic research; convenes conferences and events; and works collaboratively to understand and design media that matters. www.cmsimpact.org Internal photos: Philip Montgomery Graphic design and layout: openbox9 The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from the Spencer Foundation, without which this project would not have been possible. We also thank Ryan Blocher, Frank Franco, Cate Jackson, and Sedale McCall for transcribing participant interviews; David Proper and Kate Sheppard for copyediting; and Mitra Arthur, Caty Borum Chattoo, Brigid Maher, and Vincent Terlizzi for assisting with the report’s web presence and PR. The views expressed in this report are the authors’ alone and are not necessarily shared by the Spencer Foundation or the Center for Media and Social Impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutes of Limitation for Prosecution of Offenses Against Children (Last Updated August 2012)
    Statutes of Limitation for Prosecution of Offenses Against Children (last updated August 2012) This compilation includes statutes that establish, toll, extend, or eliminate time limitations for charging criminal offenses relating specifically to child victims. Every statute included either specifically mentions child victims or makes reference to a statute that does. This is not a statutory compilation of all criminal statute of limitations laws. General statutes of limitations that apply to all crimes without specific reference to the age of the victim or children as a class of victims are omitted. Please feel free to contact NDAA for help in ensuring compliance with all of your jurisdiction’s applicable statutes of limitation. Table of Contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS:............................................................................................................................................... 1 ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ALA. CODE § 15-3-5 (2012). Offenses having no limitation.....................................................................................4 ALASKA ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ALASKA STAT. § 12.10.010 (2012). General time limitations...................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Tips for Federal Criminal Defense Counsel on Statute of Limitations Challenges
    Professional Perspective Tips for Federal Criminal Defense Counsel on Statute of Limitations Challenges Margot Moss, Markus/Moss, and Carolyn H. Kendall, Post & Schell Read Professional Perspectives | Become a Contributor Reproduced with permission. Published February 2021. Copyright © 2021 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 800.372.1033. For further use, please contact [email protected] Tips for Federal Criminal Defense Counsel on Statute of Limitations Challenges Contributed by Margot Moss, Markus/Moss, and Carolyn H. Kendall, Post & Schell As courts navigate criminal proceedings and trials the during Covid-19 pandemic, federal criminal practitioners must ensure that solutions offered by prosecutors and courts to mitigate the pandemic's public health risks do not infringe on criminal defendants’ rights. Recognizing that the current environment presents novel issues, the Women's White Collar Defense Association (WWCDA) and its members have engaged in activities to help guide the legal community and its clients through this unique situation. In this article, WWCDA member Carolyn Kendall of Post & Schell interviewed fellow member Margot Moss of Markus/Moss about her insights and recommendations for federal white-collar practitioners about statute of limitations concerns during the pandemic. Kendall: Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, in many federal districts, grand juries have been temporarily suspended so that we are not seeing as many new cases indicted. However, the statute of limitations for continuing investigations has not been interrupted and continues to run. What happens if time is about to run out on an investigation? Moss: In an effort to extend the statute of limitations, the government has been filing informations against individuals, without their consent, and then moving to dismiss the improper charging documents without prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • RETHINKING ASSEMBLY ORDINANCES: THREE CONSIDERATIONS CITIES SHOULD MAKE to AVOID ANOTHER FERGUSON OR BALTIMORE-TYPE RIOT Christopher W
    Ohio Northern University Law Review Volume 44 | Issue 1 Article 1 RETHINKING ASSEMBLY ORDINANCES: THREE CONSIDERATIONS CITIES SHOULD MAKE TO AVOID ANOTHER FERGUSON OR BALTIMORE-TYPE RIOT Christopher W. Bloomer Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review Part of the Civil Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Bloomer, Christopher W. () "RETHINKING ASSEMBLY ORDINANCES: THREE CONSIDERATIONS CITIES SHOULD MAKE TO AVOID ANOTHER FERGUSON OR BALTIMORE-TYPE RIOT," Ohio Northern University Law Review: Vol. 44 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review/vol44/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@ONU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ohio Northern University Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@ONU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bloomer: RETHINKING ASSEMBLY ORDINANCES: THREE CONSIDERATIONS CITIES SHOUL Ohio Northern University Law Review Lead Articles Rethinking Assembly Ordinances: Three Considerations Cities Should Make To Avoid Another Ferguson Or Baltimore-Type Riot CHRISTOPHER W. BLOOMER* INTRODUCTION It is never fun footing someone else’s bill. However, cost-covering and redistribution happens with practically all illegal and destructive riots and protests that occur in the United States.1 For example, repairs from the lawless demonstrations siphoned off more than $5.7 million of local funds during the 2014 Ferguson, Missouri Riots.2 How about the 2015 Baltimore riots? The riots cost Baltimore more than $20 million, and even though the mayor refused to stop the rioting, the city requested payment assistance from the federal government to cover the tab.3 Not typically known as a site of unrest, North Dakota spent more than $38 million policing the 2016 Keystone Pipeline protests, with the Federal Emergency Management * J.D., cum laude Indiana University Robert H.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 78 Issue 2 Article 4 Spring 2021 Technological Tethereds: Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments Sonia M. Gipson Rankin University of New Mexico School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Sonia M. Gipson Rankin, Technological Tethereds: Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments, 78 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 647 (2021), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol78/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Technological Tethereds: Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments Sonia M. Gipson Rankin* Abstract Issues of racial inequality and violence are front and center today, as are issues surrounding artificial intelligence (“AI”). This Article, written by a law professor who is also a computer scientist, takes a deep dive into understanding how and why hacked and rogue AI creates unlawful and unfair outcomes, particularly for persons of color. Black Americans are disproportionally featured in criminal justice, and their stories are obfuscated. The seemingly endless back-to-back murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and heartbreakingly countless others have finally shaken the United States from its slumbering journey towards intentional criminal justice reform.
    [Show full text]