Computational Astronomy and the Earliest Visibility of Lunar Crescent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Computational Astronomy and the Earliest Visibility of Lunar Crescent COMPUTATIONAL ASTRONOMY AND THE EARLIEST VISIBILITY OF LUNAR CRESCENT Muhammad Shahid Qureshi In charge & Assistant Professor Institute of Space & Planetary Astrophysics University of Karachi ABSTRACT Basic techniques of Computational Astronomy are reviewed and presented as the essential tools for simulation of Lunar phenomena. The importance of accurate determination of Julian Date and the Local Sidereal Time is discussed that are essential to determine the local time of sunset and the local coordinates of any object at that time. During the 20th century, a number of authors have contributed towards the understanding of the problem of earliest sighting of crescent Moon. The work of Maunder, Schoch, Bruin and Schaefer has been crucial in the development of this understanding. More recently, the work of Yallop, Ilyas, Ahmed and Shaukat has received great recognition. The work of Ahmed and Shaukat has been based mostly on the Yallop’s Criterion. However almost all the modesl are based on the observational data of Schmidt who made observations from Athens for over 20 years during the late 19th century. In this work, a model of q-values developed by Yallop is analyzed in view of Maunders and the Indian Criteria along with the actual semi-diameter of the crescent Moon. The basic criterion is modified on the basis of data more recently collected. 1. INTRODUCTION Observations or results of experiments form the basis of all theories describing any physical phenomenon. More minute observations and sophisticated experiments provide testing grounds for these theories. Kepler[18][26] deduced his laws, describing motion of planets, based on data available in his time. On the basis of his dynamical theories Newton proved Kepler’s laws. However, Kepler’s Laws of Planetary motion are valid only in view of the Two-Body problem[4][26]. For instance, the orbits of planets that are assumed elliptical by Kepler do not remain elliptical even if a Three-Body problem is considered. Much later, the Newtonian Dynamics that may be effectively used to describe n-Body problem, itself failed to describe the variations in the orbit of Mercury. Even the Relativistic Mechanics of Einstein could not completely account for this variation. Description of these Physical theories and putting them to work to determine the position of celestial bodies on our skies are two different aspect of the same effort. Observed positions lead to theories and a theory has to be tested by observations. In the first part of this paper, tools of Computational Astronomy are presented, in view of the problem of determining the position of a planet or a satellite in its orbit and as it appears on the observable sky. In particular, the Two-Body[26] and the Three-Body[4] Problems are briefly reviewed and how they are used to determine positions of the Sun and the Moon in the sky. In the 1 second part the problem of earliest visibility/sighting of New Crescent Moon is presented. The work of a number of contributors and authors is reviewed. Yallop’s comparison[29] of the Maunder’s[13], the Indian[11] and the Bruin’s[3] methods is extended to include a q-test based on third degree polynomial fitted to data using Least Square Approximation. Moreover the possibility of better coefficients in the 2nd degree curve is considered to be closer to real observations. In the end, astronomical conditions for a number of recently recorded observations calculated on the basis of each method are presented with a critical discussion. 2. COMPUTATIONAL ASTRONOMY In this work, all the tools of Computational Astronomy are based on Newtonian Mechanics. The time argument used is based on Julian Date according to Gregorian Calendar[17]. The Julian Date is thus the time elapsed since the Noon at Greenwich on Monday, November 24 of the year - 4713. It is intended that this work shall be extended to higher degree of precision in order to develop an indigenous and independent simulation for the celestial phenomena considered in this work. Most of the tools discussed in this article and the next one are due to Smart[26], Danby[4] and notes from the Astronomical Almanac[28]. 2.1 SPHERICAL TRIGONOMETRY We observe all celestial objects moving on the “Celestial Sphere”. To determine the relative position of objects, angular separation between them and direction of one from the other we require Spherical Trigonometry, the study of triangle on a sphere. The shortest “distance” between two points on a sphere is along a “great circle arc”. A “great circle” is the intersection of a plane passing through the centre of the sphere with the sphere. Any plane that does not pass through the center of the sphere intersects with the sphere in a “small circle”. Let A, B and C be points on a sphere. AB, BC and AC are great circle arcs with “length” equal to c, a and b respectively, given in angular measures as shown in Figure 1 page 3. Thus a = ÐCOB,b = ÐAOC and c = ÐAOB , where O is the centre of the sphere. The basic formulas in spherical trigonometry are: Cos(a) = Cos(b)Cos(c) + Sin(b)Sin(c)Cos(A) (2.1) Sin(A) Sin(B) Sin(C) = = (2.2) Sin(a) Sin(b) Sin(c) Where A is the spherical angle between the sides b and c which is the angle between the planes the circular sectors AOC and AOB. Similarly the spherical angles B and C are defined. All the other formulas of spherical trigonometry can be obtained using these two formulas. First of the above two formulas, (2.1), gives the angular separation ‘a’ between points B and C on the sphere. Direction of a point say A from a point B is given by the spherical angle C. The two formulas can also be used to find the “shortest distances” between two places on Earth and the direction of one place from another, for instance direction of Qibla from any place on the Earth. 2 Figure 1 Figure 2 2.2 TERRESTRIAL COORDINATE SYSTEMS Latitudes and Longitudes give position of any point on the surface of earth. As shown in Figure 2 above, the reference for Latitude is the Equator, the great circle that passes through the centre of Earth and its plane is perpendicular to the axis of rotation of Earth. Semi great circles joining the North Pole(point of intersection of the surface of Earth with the axis of rotation in the northern hemisphere) and the South Pole are called Meridians. The Meridian Passing through Greenwich, near London, England is called the standard meridian. In figure 2, G is Greenwich and K is any other place, say Karachi. NGAS is the standard meridian and NKBS the local meridian of Karachi. If O be the centre of Earth then Latitude of Karachi is the angle ÐKOB denoted by j and the Longitude of Karachi is ÐAOB denoted by L. If the place K (j, L) is in the upper hemisphere its Latitude is between 00 North and 900 North. If the place is towards East of the standard meridian then its Longitude is between 00 East to 1800 East. The southern latitudes and the Western longitudes are defined in the same way. 2.3 CELESTIAL COORDINATE SYSTEMS There are a number of celestial coordinate systems that are essential for the understanding the computational astronomy. These are discussed briefly in the following: 2.3.1 GEOCENTRIC ECLIPTIC COORDINATES The positions of points on the celestial sphere are defined in a number of ways. If the equatorial plane of the Earth is extended up to the sky, the celestial sphere, it intersects the sky in a great circle called the Celestial Equator, as shown in Figure 3. For a person standing on the equator of Earth the celestial equator extends from due east to due west passing right above the head of the person through a point called Zenith(the highest point in the sky). For an observer in the northern hemisphere the celestial equator also extends from due east to due west but remains south of the 3 zenith. Similarly if the axis of rotation of Earth is extended to the sky it meets the celestial sphere in points P called the North Celestial Pole and the Q the South Celestial Pole. Although, it is Earth that revolves round the Sun, but relative to an observer on Earth the Sun travels around the Earth along a great circle called Ecliptic. The planes of the Ecliptic and the Celestial Equator are inclined to each other at angle e = 230.5 , called the Obliquity of the Ecliptic. The two great circles, the ecliptic and the celestial equator, intersect in two points g and g¢ , called the Vernal Equinox and the Autumnal Equinox. In its “journey” around Earth, the Sun reaches g on March 21, and g¢ on September 21. g , also known as, First Point of Aries, and the Ecliptic form the reference of the Ecliptic Coordinate system. The point K on the celestial sphere, which is at 900 from each point on the ecliptic, is called the Pole of the Ecliptic. If S is any point on the celestial sphere then the let KSH be great circle arc joining K through S the ecliptic at H. The Ecliptic Latitude denoted as b , of S is the angle ÐSOH and the Ecliptic Longitude denoted as l of S is the angle ÐgOH (where O is now the centre of Earth). Thus (l,b) are the Geocentric Ecliptic Coordinates of S. Figure 3 2.3.2 GEOCENTRIC EQUATORIAL COORDINATES For the Celestial Equatorial Coordinates the references are the Celestial Equator and the Vernal Equinox, as shown in Figure 3 above.
Recommended publications
  • Ast 443 / Phy 517
    AST 443 / PHY 517 Astronomical Observing Techniques Prof. F.M. Walter I. The Basics The 3 basic measurements: • WHERE something is • WHEN something happened • HOW BRIGHT something is Since this is science, let’s be quantitative! Where • Positions: – 2-dimensional projections on celestial sphere (q,f) • q,f are angular measures: radians, or degrees, minutes, arcsec – 3-dimensional position in space (x,y,z) or (q, f, r). • (x,y,z) are linear positions within a right-handed rectilinear coordinate system. • R is a distance (spherical coordinates) • Galactic positions are sometimes presented in cylindrical coordinates, of galactocentric radius, height above the galactic plane, and azimuth. Angles There are • 360 degrees (o) in a circle • 60 minutes of arc (‘) in a degree (arcmin) • 60 seconds of arc (“) in an arcmin There are • 24 hours (h) along the equator • 60 minutes of time (m) per hour • 60 seconds of time (s) per minute • 1 second of time = 15”/cos(latitude) Coordinate Systems "What good are Mercator's North Poles and Equators Tropics, Zones, and Meridian Lines?" So the Bellman would cry, and the crew would reply "They are merely conventional signs" L. Carroll -- The Hunting of the Snark • Equatorial (celestial): based on terrestrial longitude & latitude • Ecliptic: based on the Earth’s orbit • Altitude-Azimuth (alt-az): local • Galactic: based on MilKy Way • Supergalactic: based on supergalactic plane Reference points Celestial coordinates (Right Ascension α, Declination δ) • δ = 0: projection oF terrestrial equator • (α, δ) = (0,0):
    [Show full text]
  • Elliptical Orbits
    1 Ellipse-geometry 1.1 Parameterization • Functional characterization:(a: semi major axis, b ≤ a: semi minor axis) x2 y 2 b p + = 1 ⇐⇒ y(x) = · ± a2 − x2 (1) a b a • Parameterization in cartesian coordinates, which follows directly from Eq. (1): x a · cos t = with 0 ≤ t < 2π (2) y b · sin t – The origin (0, 0) is the center of the ellipse and the auxilliary circle with radius a. √ – The focal points are located at (±a · e, 0) with the eccentricity e = a2 − b2/a. • Parameterization in polar coordinates:(p: parameter, 0 ≤ < 1: eccentricity) p r(ϕ) = (3) 1 + e cos ϕ – The origin (0, 0) is the right focal point of the ellipse. – The major axis is given by 2a = r(0) − r(π), thus a = p/(1 − e2), the center is therefore at − pe/(1 − e2), 0. – ϕ = 0 corresponds to the periapsis (the point closest to the focal point; which is also called perigee/perihelion/periastron in case of an orbit around the Earth/sun/star). The relation between t and ϕ of the parameterizations in Eqs. (2) and (3) is the following: t r1 − e ϕ tan = · tan (4) 2 1 + e 2 1.2 Area of an elliptic sector As an ellipse is a circle with radius a scaled by a factor b/a in y-direction (Eq. 1), the area of an elliptic sector PFS (Fig. ??) is just this fraction of the area PFQ in the auxiliary circle. b t 2 1 APFS = · · πa − · ae · a sin t a 2π 2 (5) 1 = (t − e sin t) · a b 2 The area of the full ellipse (t = 2π) is then, of course, Aellipse = π a b (6) Figure 1: Ellipse and auxilliary circle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Determination of Longitude in Landsurveying.” by ROBERTHENRY BURNSIDE DOWSES, Assoc
    316 DOWNES ON LONGITUDE IN LAXD SUIWETISG. [Selected (Paper No. 3027.) The Determination of Longitude in LandSurveying.” By ROBERTHENRY BURNSIDE DOWSES, Assoc. M. Inst. C.E. THISPaper is presented as a sequel tothe Author’s former communication on “Practical Astronomy as applied inLand Surveying.”’ It is not generally possible for a surveyor in the field to obtain accurate determinationsof longitude unless furnished with more powerful instruments than is usually the case, except in geodetic camps; still, by the methods here given, he may with care obtain results near the truth, the error being only instrumental. There are threesuch methods for obtaining longitudes. Method 1. By Telrgrcrph or by Chronometer.-In either case it is necessary to obtain the truemean time of the place with accuracy, by means of an observation of the sun or z star; then, if fitted with a field telegraph connected with some knownlongitude, the true mean time of that place is obtained by telegraph and carefully compared withthe observed true mean time atthe observer’s place, andthe difference between thesetimes is the difference of longitude required. With a reliable chronometer set totrue Greenwich mean time, or that of anyother known observatory, the difference between the times of the place and the time of the chronometer must be noted, when the difference of longitude is directly deduced. Thisis the simplest method where a camp is furnisl~ed with eitherof these appliances, which is comparatively rarely the case. Method 2. By Lunar Distances.-This observation is one requiring great care, accurately adjusted instruments, and some littleskill to obtain good results;and the calculations are somewhat laborious.
    [Show full text]
  • Sidereal Time Distribution in Large-Scale of Orbits by Usingastronomical Algorithm Method
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438 Sidereal Time Distribution in Large-Scale of Orbits by usingAstronomical Algorithm Method Kutaiba Sabah Nimma 1UniversitiTenagaNasional,Electrical Engineering Department, Selangor, Malaysia Abstract: Sidereal Time literally means star time. The time we are used to using in our everyday lives is Solar Time.Astronomy, time based upon the rotation of the earth with respect to the distant stars, the sidereal day being the unit of measurement.Traditionally, the sidereal day is described as the time it takes for the Earth to complete one rotation relative to the stars, and help astronomers to keep them telescops directions on a given star in a night sky. In other words, earth’s rate of rotation determine according to fixed stars which is controlling the time scale of sidereal time. Many reserachers are concerned about how long the earth takes to spin based on fixed stars since the earth does not actually spin around 360 degrees in one solar day.Furthermore, the computations of the sidereal time needs to take a long time to calculate the number of the Julian centuries. This paper shows a new method of calculating the Sidereal Time, which is very important to determine the stars location at any given time. In addition, this method provdes high accuracy results with short time of calculation. Keywords: Sidereal time; Orbit allocation;Geostationary Orbit;SolarDays;Sidereal Day 1. Introduction (the upper meridian) in the sky[6]. Solar time is what the time we all use where a day is defined as 24 hours, which is The word "sidereal" comes from the Latin word sider, the average time that it takes for the sun to return to its meaning star.
    [Show full text]
  • Sidereal Time 1 Sidereal Time
    Sidereal time 1 Sidereal time Sidereal time (pronounced /saɪˈdɪəri.əl/) is a time-keeping system astronomers use to keep track of the direction to point their telescopes to view a given star in the night sky. Just as the Sun and Moon appear to rise in the east and set in the west, so do the stars. A sidereal day is approximately 23 hours, 56 minutes, 4.091 seconds (23.93447 hours or 0.99726957 SI days), corresponding to the time it takes for the Earth to complete one rotation relative to the vernal equinox. The vernal equinox itself precesses very slowly in a westward direction relative to the fixed stars, completing one revolution every 26,000 years approximately. As a consequence, the misnamed sidereal day, as "sidereal" is derived from the Latin sidus meaning "star", is some 0.008 seconds shorter than the earth's period of rotation relative to the fixed stars. The longer true sidereal period is called a stellar day by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS). It is also referred to as the sidereal period of rotation. The direction from the Earth to the Sun is constantly changing (because the Earth revolves around the Sun over the course of a year), but the directions from the Earth to the distant stars do not change nearly as much. Therefore the cycle of the apparent motion of the stars around the Earth has a period that is not quite the same as the 24-hour average length of the solar day. Maps of the stars in the night sky usually make use of declination and right ascension as coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Moon-Earth-Sun: the Oldest Three-Body Problem
    Moon-Earth-Sun: The oldest three-body problem Martin C. Gutzwiller IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 The daily motion of the Moon through the sky has many unusual features that a careful observer can discover without the help of instruments. The three different frequencies for the three degrees of freedom have been known very accurately for 3000 years, and the geometric explanation of the Greek astronomers was basically correct. Whereas Kepler’s laws are sufficient for describing the motion of the planets around the Sun, even the most obvious facts about the lunar motion cannot be understood without the gravitational attraction of both the Earth and the Sun. Newton discussed this problem at great length, and with mixed success; it was the only testing ground for his Universal Gravitation. This background for today’s many-body theory is discussed in some detail because all the guiding principles for our understanding can be traced to the earliest developments of astronomy. They are the oldest results of scientific inquiry, and they were the first ones to be confirmed by the great physicist-mathematicians of the 18th century. By a variety of methods, Laplace was able to claim complete agreement of celestial mechanics with the astronomical observations. Lagrange initiated a new trend wherein the mathematical problems of mechanics could all be solved by the same uniform process; canonical transformations eventually won the field. They were used for the first time on a large scale by Delaunay to find the ultimate solution of the lunar problem by perturbing the solution of the two-body Earth-Moon problem.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to Celestial Navigation5.16 MB
    A Short Guide to elestial Na1igation Copyright A 1997 2011 (enning -mland Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the G.2 Free Documentation -icense, 3ersion 1.3 or any later version published by the Free 0oftware Foundation% with no ,nvariant 0ections, no Front Cover 1eIts and no Back Cover 1eIts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "G.2 Free Documentation -icense". ,evised October 1 st , 2011 First Published May 20 th , 1997 .ndeB 1reface Chapter 1he Basics of Celestial ,aEigation Chapter 2 Altitude Measurement Chapter 3 )eographic .osition and 1ime Chapter 4 Finding One's .osition 0ight Reduction) Chapter 5 Finding the .osition of an Advancing 2essel Determination of Latitude and Longitude, Direct Calculation of Chapter 6 .osition Chapter 7 Finding 1ime and Longitude by Lunar Distances Chapter 8 Rise, 0et, 1wilight Chapter 9 )eodetic Aspects of Celestial ,aEigation Chapter 0 0pherical 1rigonometry Chapter 1he ,aEigational 1riangle Chapter 12 )eneral Formulas for ,aEigation Chapter 13 Charts and .lotting 0heets Chapter 14 Magnetic Declination Chapter 15 Ephemerides of the 0un Chapter 16 ,aEigational Errors Chapter 17 1he Marine Chronometer AppendiB -02 ,ree Documentation /icense Much is due to those who first bro-e the way to -now.edge, and .eft on.y to their successors the tas- of smoothing it Samue. Johnson Prefa e Why should anybody still practice celestial naRigation in the era of electronics and 18S? 7ne might as Sell ask Shy some photographers still develop black-and-Shite photos in their darkroom instead of using a digital camera.
    [Show full text]
  • A Series Solution for Some Periodic Orbits in the Restricted Three-Body Problem According to the Perturbation Method*
    1966028656-225 !'_#.,/I ,i A SERIES SOLUTION FOR SOME PERIODIC ORBITS IN THE RESTRICTED THREE-BODY PROBLEM ACCORDING TO THE PERTURBATION METHOD* q Oil9"b su-s.u.UAXO, bodies in the restric'_ed three-body problem. The expansion is in terms of the mass of the less b massiveA seriesfiniteis body.obtainedThefor initialthose periodicconditionsorbitspredictedsurroundingby thetheseriesmoreformassiveseveral ofperiodicthe two orbitsfinite are compared with those obtained by purely numerical processes. They are in good ttgreement for the case corresponding to the earth-moon system. Also, a simple theory of nearly periodic orbits in the neighborhood of a periodic orbit is developed and numerically verified by ex'tmples. Finally, it is suggested that, if asteroids avoid places where their orbits wouhl be commensurable with the period of Jupiter, then artificial satellites and dust particles may avoid certain areas around the earth as a result of the presence of the moon. INTF:ODUCTION Actually, the present analysis is somewhat par- allel to the analysis that led Hill to his variation A periodic solution may be regarded as a solu- orbit, for both his and the present method ,lcpend tion of the differential equations of motion that upon some series expansions. However, in his satisfies, in addition to the initial conditions, the lunar theory Hill expanded the sohltion in terms condition that after a lapse of one period, P, both of the ratio of the mean motion of tim sun to that coordinates and velocities return to their initial of the moon in tlle rotating coordinate system. values. Thus, the problem of finding a periodic In this prcsent theory for artificial satellites orbit in celestial mechanics resembles the problem orbiting the earth in the earth-moon system the of finding the eigen function for an eigen value in solution is expanded in terms of the mass of the quantum mechanics, since the eigen value is deter- moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Sidereal Time (LST) = Greenwich Sidereal Time (GST) +
    AST326, 2010 Winter Semester • Celestial Sphere • Spectroscopy • (Something interesting; e.g ., advanced data analyses with IDL) • Practical Assignment: analyses of Keck spectroscopic data from the instructor (can potentially be a research paper) − “there will be multiple presentations by students” • Telescope sessions for spectroscopy in late Feb &March • Bonus projects (e.g., spectroscopic observations using the campus telescope) will be given. Grading: Four Problem Sets (16%), Four Lab Assignments (16%), Telescope Operation – Spectrograph (pass or fail; 5%), One Exam(25%), Practical Assignment (28%), Class Participation & Activities (10%) The Celestial Sphere Reference Reading: Observational Astronomy Chapter 4 The Celestial Sphere We will learn ● Great Circles; ● Coordinate Systems; ● Hour Angle and Sidereal Time, etc; ● Seasons and Sun Motions; ● The Celestial Sphere “We will be able to calculate when a given star will appear in my sky.” The Celestial Sphere Woodcut image displayed in Flammarion's `L'Atmosphere: Meteorologie Populaire (Paris, 1888)' Courtesy University of Oklahoma History of Science Collections The celestial sphere: great circle The Celestial Sphere: Great Circle A great circle on a sphere is any circle that shares the same center point as the sphere itself. Any two points on the surface of a sphere, if not exactly opposite one another, define a unique great circle going through them. A line drawn along a great circle is actually the shortest distance between the two points (see next slides). A small circle is any circle drawn on the sphere that does not share the same center as the sphere. The celestial sphere: great circle The Celestial Sphere: Great Circle •A great circle divides the surface of a sphere in two equal parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Mechanics Course Notes
    Orbital Mechanics Course Notes David J. Westpfahl Professor of Astrophysics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology March 31, 2011 2 These are notes for a course in orbital mechanics catalogued as Aerospace Engineering 313 at New Mexico Tech and Aerospace Engineering 362 at New Mexico State University. This course uses the text “Fundamentals of Astrodynamics” by R.R. Bate, D. D. Muller, and J. E. White, published by Dover Publications, New York, copyright 1971. The notes do not follow the book exclusively. Additional material is included when I believe that it is needed for clarity, understanding, historical perspective, or personal whim. We will cover the material recommended by the authors for a one-semester course: all of Chapter 1, sections 2.1 to 2.7 and 2.13 to 2.15 of Chapter 2, all of Chapter 3, sections 4.1 to 4.5 of Chapter 4, and as much of Chapters 6, 7, and 8 as time allows. Purpose The purpose of this course is to provide an introduction to orbital me- chanics. Students who complete the course successfully will be prepared to participate in basic space mission planning. By basic mission planning I mean the planning done with closed-form calculations and a calculator. Stu- dents will have to master additional material on numerical orbit calculation before they will be able to participate in detailed mission planning. There is a lot of unfamiliar material to be mastered in this course. This is one field of human endeavor where engineering meets astronomy and ce- lestial mechanics, two fields not usually included in an engineering curricu- lum.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Thrust Orbit Transfer Optimiser for a Spacecraft Simulator (Espss -Ecosimpro® European Space Propulsion System Simulation)
    6th ICATT, Darmstadt, March 15th to 17th, 2016 LOW THRUST ORBIT TRANSFER OPTIMISER FOR A SPACECRAFT SIMULATOR (ESPSS -ECOSIMPRO® EUROPEAN SPACE PROPULSION SYSTEM SIMULATION) Christophe R. Koppel KopooS Consulting Ind., 57 rue d'Amsterdam-75008 Paris ABSTRACT and analyses. That is a visual tool capable of solving various kinds of dynamic systems represented by writing equations The paper describes the general strategy for electric and discrete events. It can be used to study both transients propulsion orbit transfers, an open source optimiser for orbit and steady states. Such object oriented tool, with the transfer based on averaging techniques and the integration propulsion libraries ESPSS from ESA for example, allows of such trajectory optimiser into EcosimPro® ESPSS users to draw (and design at the same time) the propulsion (European Space Propulsion System Simulation). system with components of that specific library with tanks, EcosimPro® is a Physical Simulation Modelling tool that is lines, orifices, thrusters, tees. The user enhances the design an object-oriented visual simulation tool capable of solving with components from the other libraries (thermal, control various kinds of dynamic systems represented by a set of electrical, EP, etc). equations, differential equations and discrete events. It can Into the last release of ESPSS [16], new features address be used to study both transients and steady states. The object "Evolutionary behaviour of components" and "Coupled oriented tool, with the propulsion libraries ESPSS from ESA Simulation of Propulsion System and Vehicle Dynamics" , for example, allows the user to draw (and to design at the which is actually a "Satellite library" that includes the flight same time) the propulsion system with components of that dynamic (orbit and attitude) capabilities for a full spacecraft specific library with tanks, lines, orifices, thrusters, tees.
    [Show full text]
  • TIME 1. Introduction 2. Time Scales
    TIME 1. Introduction The TCS requires access to time in various forms and accuracies. This document briefly explains the various time scale, illustrate the mean to obtain the time, and discusses the TCS implementation. 2. Time scales International Atomic Time (TIA) is a man-made, laboratory timescale. Its units the SI seconds which is based on the frequency of the cesium-133 atom. TAI is the International Atomic Time scale, a statistical timescale based on a large number of atomic clocks. Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) – UTC is the basis of civil timekeeping. The UTC uses the SI second, which is an atomic time, as it fundamental unit. The UTC is kept in time with the Earth rotation. However, the rate of the Earth rotation is not uniform (with respect to atomic time). To compensate a leap second is added usually at the end of June or December about every 18 months. Also the earth is divided in to standard-time zones, and UTC differs by an integral number of hours between time zones (parts of Canada and Australia differ by n+0.5 hours). You local time is UTC adjusted by your timezone offset. Universal Time (UT1) – Universal time or, more specifically UT1, is counted from 0 hours at midnight, with unit of duration the mean solar day, defined to be as uniform as possible despite variations in the rotation of the Earth. It is observed as the diurnal motion of stars or extraterrestrial radio sources. It is continuous (no leap second), but has a variable rate due the Earth’s non-uniform rotational period.
    [Show full text]