DOCSLIB.ORG

Multispecies Coalescent Delimits Structure, Not Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multispecies Coalescent Delimits Structure, Not Species Multispecies coalescent delimits structure, not species Jeet Sukumarana,1,2 and L. Lacey Knowlesa,1 aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109-1079 Edited by David M. Hillis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved December 29, 2016 (received for review May 23, 2016) The multispecies coalescent model underlies many approaches consequence, the increased resolution of genomic data makes it used for species delimitation. In previous work assessing the per- possible to not only detect divergent species lineages, but also formance of species delimitation under this model, speciation was local population structure within them—that is, a fractal hierar- treated as an instantaneous event rather than as an extended chy of divergences. process involving distinct phases of speciation initiation (struc- Misidentification of population structure as putative species turing) and completion. Here, we use data under simulations is therefore emerging as a key issue (8) that has received insuf- that explicitly model speciation as an extended process rather ficient attention, especially with respect to methodologies for than an instantaneous event and carry out species delimitation delimiting taxa based on genetic data alone. Because species inference on these data under the multispecies coalescent. We delimitation is inextricably linked to patterns of species diversity, show that the multispecies coalescent diagnoses genetic struc- the models used to delimit species are not just limited to issues ture, not species, and that it does not statistically distinguish about species boundaries, but are also paramount to understand- structure associated with population isolation vs. species bound- ing the generation and dynamics of biodiversity (9–12). Conse- aries. Because of the misidentification of population structure as quently, when the lines become blurred—delimiting species in putative species, our work raises questions about the practice of some cases, but populations in other cases—species delimita- genome-based species discovery, with cascading consequences in tion becomes a critical issue with ramifications across multiple other fields. Specifically, all fields that rely on species as units fields of study, such as, for example, the estimation of diversity in of analysis, from conservation biology to studies of macroevolu- macroecological studies (13–15), analyses of food webs (16), or tionary dynamics, will be impacted by inflated estimates of the conservation, where oversplitting of small, isolated populations number of species, especially as genomic resources provide based on genetic data could be detrimental (17). More funda- EVOLUTION unprecedented power for detecting increasingly finer-scaled mentally, distinguishing between species- and population-level genetic structure under the multispecies coalescent. As such, lineages is central to understanding the speciation process itself our work also represents a general call for systematic study to (18, 19). reconsider a reliance on genomic data alone. Until new meth- Not all populations become species. Instead, speciation theory ods are developed that can discriminate between structure due points to a continuum for the probability that a population lin- to population-level processes and that due to species boundaries, eage will evolve into a new species (20). Depending on the extent genomic-based results should only be considered a hypothesis and duration of isolation and the form and strength of selection, that requires validation of delimited species with multiple data speciation becomes more or less a protracted process, with new types, such as phenotypic and ecological information. lineages only gradually and stochastically evolving from the ini- tially isolated lineages into true species over time (18, 19, 21). This multispecies coalescent j species delimitation j coalescent theory process is in contrast to commonly applied birth–death models, in which speciation is abstracted as an instantaneous event, such that all divergent lineages are treated as immediately forming true ajor advances in understanding the patterns of biodiver- species (22). Here, we investigate the robustness of species delim- Msity and the processes that generate those patterns are itation under the multispecies coalescent model when speciation being made with increasing rapidity, scope, and scale, as we study species across the tree of life (e.g., refs. 1–3). These advances take the boundaries of the species that constitute their funda- Significance mental units as known. Identification of these boundaries—that is, species delimitation—currently is making increasing use of Despite its widespread application to the species delim- genomic data under statistical model-based approaches, typi- itation problem, our study demonstrates that what the cally using the multispecies coalescent model (4), as opposed multispecies coalescent actually delimits is structure. The to traditional taxonomic work based on phenotypic data. Cou- current implementations of species delimitation under the pled with technological advances for collecting genomic datasets multispecies coalescent do not provide any way for distin- across many individuals per putative species, inference under guishing between structure due to population-level processes the multispecies coalescent model provides us with consider- and that due to species boundaries. The overinflation of able power in identifying recently diverged taxon boundaries. species due to the misidentification of general genetic struc- For example, simulations show that we can delimit lineages with ture for species boundaries has profound implications for our extremely short divergence times, as with the popular program understanding of the generation and dynamics of biodiver- BPP (Bayesian Phylogenetics and Phylogeography) (5). How- sity, because any ecological or evolutionary studies that rely ever, these remarkable gains have also paradoxically given rise to on species as their fundamental units will be impacted, as a new challenge—determining whether what we delimited genet- well as the very existence of this biodiversity, because con- ically represents lineages isolated due to speciation or simply servation planning is undermined due to isolated populations within-species population structure. Population genetic structure incorrectly being treated as distinct species. is ubiquitous among all taxa in which gene flow is reduced by geo- graphic and/or environmental barriers (6). However, the extent Author contributions: J.S. and L.L.K. designed research, performed research, analyzed of population structure varies as the level of gene flow and time data, and wrote the paper. of separation results in more or less evolutionary independence The authors declare no conflict of interest. among populations (7). With more loci, there is the possibility This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. of detecting ever-more-fine population structure and potentially 1J.S. and L.L.K. contributed equally to this work. confounding population structure with species boundaries. As a 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1607921114 PNAS j February 14, 2017 j vol. 114 j no. 7 j 1607–1612 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 Splitting events such as this are initiation of speciation through, e.g. population isolation. Color change indicates completion of speciation and development of true species from erred under the multispecies coalescent incipient species Tree inf True speciation history Fig. 1. (Left) The tree represents the true history upon which the gene genealogies (shown by thin purple lines) are conditioned, with the colors repre- senting species. Note that here we show a single representative gene genealogy, with four individuals sampled per lineage, whereas in practice multiple gene genealogies are sampled for delimiting species. This tree shows speciation as a process rather than speciation as an event. That is, the internal nodes of the containing tree do not represent instantaneous complete speciation events, but, rather, initiation of the speciation process due to microevolutionary processes that result in population isolation. Not all of the lineages that arise due to population isolation develop into true species. For example, some may merge back into the other lineages of the same species in the future if whatever barriers led to their isolation were to be removed (i.e., the evolutionary independence will be ephemeral because two populations belonging to the same species do not have an impediment to reproduction). Some of these isolated incipient species lineages, however, do stochastically develop into true species (indicated by shift in color), so that they will remain distinct lineages with independent evolutionary trajectories that do not merge back into their parental species, even if the isolation barriers were to disappear. (Upper Right) The tree shows the results of inference under the multispecies coalescent using BPP, which includes the structuring both due to species boundaries as well as due to lineage splitting as a result of population isolation. As such, the inference corresponds to the full structural history, but not the true speciation history, which is shown by the tree in Lower Right. That is, the multispecies coalescent does not distinguish between structuring due to population isolation vs. structuring due to speciation: It only identifies genetic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science Fiction and Astronomy
    Sci Fi Science Fiction and Astronomy Many science fiction books include subjects of astronomical interest. Here is a list of some that have been recommended to me or I’ve read. I expect that most are not in the University library but many are available in Kindle and other e-formats. At the top of my list is a URL to a much longer list by Andrew Fraknoi of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Each title in his list has a very brief summary indicating the kind of story it is. Andrew Fraknoi’s list (http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/scifi.html). Gregory Benford is a plasma physicist who has been rated by some as one of the finest observes and interpreters of science in modern fiction. Note: Timescape [Vista, ISBN 0575600500] In the Ocean of Night [Vista, ISBN 0575600357] Across the Sea of Suns [Vista, ISBN 0575600551] Great Sky River [Gallancy, ISBN 0575058315] Eater and over 2 dozen more available as e-books. Stephen Baxter Titan [Voyager, 1997, ISBN 0002254247] has been strongly recommended by New Scientist as a tense, near future, thriller you shouldn’t miss. David Brin has a PhD in astrophysics with which he brings real understanding of the Universe to his stories. The Crystal Spheres won an award. Fred Hoyle is probably the most famous astronomer to have written science fiction. The Back Cloud [Macmillan, ISBN 0333556011] is his classic, followed by A for Andromeda. Try also October the First is too late. Larry Niven’s stories include plenty of ideas inspired by modern astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics
    Science Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics: A Topical Index Compiled by Andrew Fraknoi (U. of San Francisco, Fromm Institute) Version 7 (2019) © copyright 2019 by Andrew Fraknoi. All rights reserved. Permission to use for any non-profit educational purpose, such as distribution in a classroom, is hereby granted. For any other use, please contact the author. (e-mail: fraknoi {at} fhda {dot} edu) This is a selective list of some short stories and novels that use reasonably accurate science and can be used for teaching or reinforcing astronomy or physics concepts. The titles of short stories are given in quotation marks; only short stories that have been published in book form or are available free on the Web are included. While one book source is given for each short story, note that some of the stories can be found in other collections as well. (See the Internet Speculative Fiction Database, cited at the end, for an easy way to find all the places a particular story has been published.) The author welcomes suggestions for additions to this list, especially if your favorite story with good science is left out. Gregory Benford Octavia Butler Geoff Landis J. Craig Wheeler TOPICS COVERED: Anti-matter Light & Radiation Solar System Archaeoastronomy Mars Space Flight Asteroids Mercury Space Travel Astronomers Meteorites Star Clusters Black Holes Moon Stars Comets Neptune Sun Cosmology Neutrinos Supernovae Dark Matter Neutron Stars Telescopes Exoplanets Physics, Particle Thermodynamics Galaxies Pluto Time Galaxy, The Quantum Mechanics Uranus Gravitational Lenses Quasars Venus Impacts Relativity, Special Interstellar Matter Saturn (and its Moons) Story Collections Jupiter (and its Moons) Science (in general) Life Elsewhere SETI Useful Websites 1 Anti-matter Davies, Paul Fireball.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drink Tank Sixth Annual Giant Sized [email protected]: James Bacon & Chris Garcia
    The Drink Tank Sixth Annual Giant Sized Annual [email protected] Editors: James Bacon & Chris Garcia A Noise from the Wind Stephen Baxter had got me through the what he’ll be doing. I first heard of Stephen Baxter from Jay night. So, this is the least Giant Giant Sized Crasdan. It was a night like any other, sitting in I remember reading Ring that next Annual of The Drink Tank, but still, I love it! a room with a mostly naked former ballerina afternoon when I should have been at class. I Dedicated to Mr. Stephen Baxter. It won’t cover who was in the middle of what was probably finished it in less than 24 hours and it was such everything, but it’s a look at Baxter’s oevre and her fifth overdose in as many months. This was a blast. I wasn’t the big fan at that moment, the effect he’s had on his readers. I want to what we were dealing with on a daily basis back though I loved the novel. I had to reread it, thank Claire Brialey, M Crasdan, Jay Crasdan, then. SaBean had been at it again, and this time, and then grabbed a copy of Anti-Ice a couple Liam Proven, James Bacon, Rick and Elsa for it was up to me and Jay to clean up the mess. of days later. Perhaps difficult times made Ring everything! I had a blast with this one! Luckily, we were practiced by this point. Bottles into an excellent escape from the moment, and of water, damp washcloths, the 9 and the first something like a month later I got into it again, 1 dialed just in case things took a turn for the and then it hit.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Coalescent Theory: Pedigrees, Identity-By-Descent, and Sequentially Markov Coalescent Models
    Frontiers in Coalescent Theory: Pedigrees, Identity-by-Descent, and Sequentially Markov Coalescent Models The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilton, Peter R. 2016. Frontiers in Coalescent Theory: Pedigrees, Identity-by-Descent, and Sequentially Markov Coalescent Models. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493608 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Frontiers in Coalescent Theory: Pedigrees, Identity-by-descent, and Sequentially Markov Coalescent Models a dissertation presented by Peter Richard Wilton to The Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2016 ©2016 – Peter Richard Wilton all rights reserved. Thesis advisor: Professor John Wakeley Peter Richard Wilton Frontiers in Coalescent Theory: Pedigrees, Identity-by-descent, and Sequentially Markov Coalescent Models Abstract The coalescent is a stochastic process that describes the genetic ancestry of individuals sampled from a population. It is one of the main tools of theoretical population genetics and has been used as the basis of many sophisticated methods of inferring the demo- graphic history of a population from a genetic sample. This dissertation is presented in four chapters, each developing coalescent theory to some degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Progress in Coalescent Theory
    SOCIEDADEBRASILEIRADEMATEMÁTICA ENSAIOS MATEMATICOS´ 200X, Volume XX, X–XX Recent Progress in Coalescent Theory Nathana¨el Berestycki Abstract. Coalescent theory is the study of random processes where particles may join each other to form clusters as time evolves. These notes provide an introduction to some aspects of the mathe- matics of coalescent processes and their applications to theoretical population genetics and other fields such as spin glass models. The emphasis is on recent work concerning in particular the connection of these processes to continuum random trees and spatial models such as coalescing random walks. arXiv:0909.3985v1 [math.PR] 22 Sep 2009 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 60J25, 60K35, 60J80. Introduction The probabilistic theory of coalescence, which is the primary subject of these notes, has expanded at a quick pace over the last decade or so. I can think of three factors which have essentially contributed to this growth. On the one hand, there has been a rising demand from population geneticists to develop and analyse models which incorporate more realistic features than what Kingman’s coalescent allows for. Simultaneously, the field has matured enough that a wide range of techniques from modern probability theory may be success- fully applied to these questions. These tools include for instance martingale methods, renormalization and random walk arguments, combinatorial embeddings, sample path analysis of Brownian motion and L´evy processes, and, last but not least, continuum random trees and measure-valued processes. Finally, coalescent processes arise in a natural way from spin glass models of statistical physics. The identification of the Bolthausen-Sznitman coalescent as a universal scaling limit in those models, and the connection made by Brunet and Derrida to models of population genetics, is a very exciting re- cent development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Triple-Ring Nebula: Fingerprint of a Binary Merger1 (Or Supernova 1987A: a Mystery Solved)
    The Triple-Ring Nebula: Fingerprint of a Binary Merger1 (or Supernova 1987A: a Mystery Solved) Supernova 1987A (SN 1987A), the first naked-eye supernova observed since Kepler’s supernova in 1604, was an anomalous supernova that has confounded astronomers for many years. Its anomalies have long been attributed to the merger of two massive stars that occurred some 20,000 years before the explo- sion, but so far there has been no conclusive proof that this merger took place. In the present issue of Science Magazine, we present three-dimensional hydro- dynamical simulations of the mass ejection associated with such a merger and the subsequent evolution of the ejecta, and we show that this accurately re- produces the properties of the triple-ring nebula surrounding the supernova in great detail. This proves beyond reasonable doubt the merger model for SN 1987A and brings to an end a 20-year old mystery. Scientific credit: Prof. Philipp Podsiadlowski, Oxford University Dr Thomas Morris, Oxford University and MPA, Munich Dr Natasha Ivanova, Oxford University, now CITA, Toronto 1 Background A supernova is caused by the explosion of a massive star at the end of its evolution. Supernova 1987A (SN 1987A) was the first supernova visible with the naked eye since Kepler’s supernova in 1604. It occurred on February 23, 1987 in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of our own galaxy, the Milky Way, about 180,000 lightyears away2. Since it was the first nearby supernova seen in almost 400 years, it has long been awaited by astronomers and therefore was one of the major astronomical events of the 80s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Science of Signals with Implica- Signals … Through Empty Space” Investigated by Einstein Tions for Telecommunication Technologies
    determining time but not limited to them. Einstein expanded his work from its initial focus on time signaling to signaling A Science of in general. In the process, he learned that neither love nor time could travel at speeds faster than that of light. Einstein often claimed that his theory seemed strange Signals only because in our “everyday life” we did not experience delays in the transmission speed of light signals: “One would Einstein, Inertia and the Postal have noticed this [relativity theory] long ago, if, for the System practical experience of everyday life light did not appear” to be infinitely fast.4 But precisely this aspect of everyday life was changing apace with the spread of new electromagnetic Jimena Canales communication technologies, particularly after World War I. The expansion of electromagnetic communication technolo- What do the speed of light and inertia have in common? gies and their reach into everyday life occurred in exact According to the famous physicist Arthur Eddington, who parallel to the expansion and success of Einstein’s theory of led the expedition to prove Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, relativity. Kafka, who used similar communications system they had a lot in common: “[the speed of light] is the speed at as Einstein and whose obsessive focus on “messengers” and which the mass of matter becomes infinite,” where “lengths their delays paralleled Einstein’s focus on “signals” and their contract to zero” and—most surprisingly—where “clocks delays, described the radical change he was seeing around stand still.”1 The speed of light “crops up in all kinds of him in the 1920s: problems whether light is concerned or not,” reaching all the way into the concept of inertia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fellowship of the Ring
    iii THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING being the first part of THE LORD OF THE RINGS by J.R.R. TOLKIEN Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky, Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone, Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die, One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. CONTENTS Note on the Text ix Note on the 50th Anniversary Edition xviii Foreword to the Second Edition xxiii Prologue Concerning Hobbits, and other matters 1 book one I A Long-expected Party 27 II The Shadow of the Past 55 III Three is Company 85 IV A Short Cut to Mushrooms 112 V A Conspiracy Unmasked 128 VI The Old Forest 143 VII In the House of Tom Bombadil 161 VIII Fog on the Barrow-downs 176 IX At the Sign of The Prancing Pony 195 X Strider 213 XI A Knife in the Dark 230 XII Flight to the Ford 257 book two I Many Meetings 285 II The Council of Elrond 311 III The Ring Goes South 354 viii contents IV A Journey in the Dark 384 V The Bridge of Khazad-duˆm 418 VI Lothlo´rien 433 VII The Mirror of Galadriel 459 VIII Farewell to Lo´rien 478 IX The Great River 495 X The Breaking of the Fellowship 515 Maps 533 Works By J.R.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Progress in Coalescent Theory
    SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE MATEMÁTICA ENSAIOS MATEMATICOS¶ 2009, Volume 16, 1{193 Recent progress in coalescent theory NathanaÄel Berestycki Abstract. Coalescent theory is the study of random processes where particles may join each other to form clusters as time evolves. These notes provide an introduction to some aspects of the mathematics of coalescent processes and their applications to theoretical population genetics and in other ¯elds such as spin glass models. The emphasis is on recent work concerning in particular the connection of these processes to continuum random trees and spatial models such as coalescing random walks. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classi¯cation: 60J25, 60K35, 60J80. Contents Introduction 7 1 Random exchangeable partitions 9 1.1 De¯nitions and basic results . 9 1.2 Size-biased picking . 14 1.2.1 Single pick . 14 1.2.2 Multiple picks, size-biased ordering . 16 1.3 The Poisson-Dirichlet random partition . 17 1.3.1 Case ® = 0 . 17 1.3.2 Case θ = 0 . 20 1.3.3 A Poisson construction . 20 1.4 Some examples . 21 1.4.1 Random permutations . 22 1.4.2 Prime number factorisation . 24 1.4.3 Brownian excursions . 24 1.5 Tauberian theory of random partitions . 26 1.5.1 Some general theory . 26 1.5.2 Example . 30 2 Kingman's coalescent 31 2.1 De¯nition and construction . 31 2.1.1 De¯nition . 31 2.1.2 Coming down from in¯nity . 33 2.1.3 Aldous' construction . 35 2.2 The genealogy of populations . 39 2.2.1 A word of vocabulary . 40 2.2.2 The Moran and the Wright-Fisher models .
    [Show full text]
  • Introductions to Heritage Assets: Ships and Boats: Prehistory to 1840
    Ships and Boats: Prehistory to 1840 Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Many of these are what might be thought of as ‘new heritage’, that is they date from after the Second World War. Principally from the archaeological evidence, this overview identifies and describes pre-Industrial vessels (that is from the earliest times to about 1840) used on inland and coastal waters and the open sea, as well as ones abandoned in coastal areas. It includes vessels buried through reclamation or some other process: many of the most significant early boats and ships have been discovered on land rather than at sea. Vessels and wrecks pre-dating 1840 are relatively rare: the latter comprise just 4 per cent of known sites around the English coast. This guidance note has been written by Mark Dunkley and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed at HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ First published by English Heritage March 2012. This edition published by Historic England July 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Arcs in Saturn\'S F Ring During the 1995 Sun Ring-Plane
    A&A 365, 214–221 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000183 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics Detection of arcs in Saturn’s F ring during the 1995 Sun ring-plane crossing S. Charnoz1, A. Brahic1, C. Ferrari1, I. Grenier1, F. Roddier2,andP.Th´ebault3 1 Equipe´ Gamma-Gravitation, Service d’Astrophysique, CEA/Saclay, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France 2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawai 96822, Hawai 3 DESPA, Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon Cedex Principal, France Received 24 July 2000 / Accepted 19 October 2000 Abstract. Observations of the November 1995 Sun crossing of the Saturn’s ring-plane made with the 3.6 m CFH telescope, using the UHAO adaptive optics system, are presented here. We report the detection of four arcs located in the vicinity of the F ring. They can be seen one day later in HST images. The combination of both data sets gives accurate determinations of their orbits. Semi-major axes range from 140 020 km to 140 080 km, with a mean of 140 060 60 km. This is about 150 km smaller than previous estimates of the F ring radius from Voyager 1 and 2 data, but close to the orbit of another arc observed at the same epoch in HST images. Key words. planets: individual: Saturn 1. Introduction satellites might explain some features, but they are not completely understood. The Sun’s crossing of Saturn’s ring-plane is a rare oppor- During the 1995 ring crossing observing campaign, the tunity to observe the unlit face of the rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Firstborn by Arthur C. Clarke , Stephen Baxter
    Read and Download Ebook Firstborn... Firstborn Arthur C. Clarke , Stephen Baxter PDF File: Firstborn... 1 Read and Download Ebook Firstborn... Firstborn Arthur C. Clarke , Stephen Baxter Firstborn Arthur C. Clarke , Stephen Baxter The Firstborn–the mysterious race of aliens who first became known to science fiction fans as the builders of the iconic black monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey–have inhabited legendary master of science fiction Sir Arthur C. Clarke’s writing for decades. With Time’s Eye and Sunstorm, the first two books in their acclaimed Time Odyssey series, Clarke and his brilliant co-author Stephen Baxter imagined a near-future in which the Firstborn seek to stop the advance of human civilization by employing a technology indistinguishable from magic. Their first act was the Discontinuity, in which Earth was carved into sections from different eras of history, restitched into a patchwork world, and renamed Mir. Mir’s inhabitants included such notables as Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, and United Nations peacekeeper Bisesa Dutt. For reasons unknown to her, Bisesa entered into communication with an alien artifact of inscrutable purpose and godlike power–a power that eventually returned her to Earth. There, she played an instrumental role in humanity’s race against time to stop a doomsday event: a massive solar storm triggered by the alien Firstborn designed to eradicate all life from the planet. That fate was averted at an inconceivable price. Now, twenty-seven years later, the Firstborn are back. This time, they are pulling no punches: They have sent a “quantum bomb.” Speeding toward Earth, it is a device that human scientists can barely comprehend, that cannot be stopped or destroyed–and one that will obliterate Earth.
    [Show full text]