Creativity and the Brain's Default Mode Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creativity and the Brain's Default Mode Network 5 Creativity and the Brain’s Default Mode Network Marcus E. Raichle The purpose of this chapter is to explore some new ways of thinking about how the brain instantiates creativity. The route taken begins with an appraisal of the brain’s intrinsic or ongoing activity which, as I will explain, is the dominant mode of brain activity. A productive discussion of creativity must take into account the role of intrinsic activity. An important feature of this approach is to highlight the critical role of a recently discovered brain network, the default mode network (DMN), which serves in the organization of intrinsic activity and among whose component operations (i.e., memory and the adjudication of risk-taking) are im- portant elements of creativity. I begin with some general background material on intrinsic activity. Intrinsic Brain Activity Intrinsic activity refers to activity in all regions of the brain that is always pre- sent regardless of one’s state. It is present in conditions as varied as quiet repose with daydreaming to the full range of human behaviors. Intrinsic activity is also prominent during sleep. Intrinsic activity is easily observed with electrical recordings of brain activity obtained, for example, with electroencephalography (EEG). For those not fa- miliar with EEG, it is performed with a large array of electrodes placed over the scalp. A noteworthy observation concerning this activity was made in 1929, by the German psychiatrist Hans Berger who performed the first EEGs on human subjects.1 Introducing his new technique, he rhetorically asked “Is it possible to demonstrate the influence of intellectual work upon the human electroenceph- alogram, insofar as it has been reported here? Of course, one should not at first entertain too high hopes with regard to this, because mental work, as I explained elsewhere, adds only a small increment to the cortical work which is going on continuously and not only in the waking state.”2 Marcus E. Raichle, Creativity and the Brain’s Default Mode Network. In: Secrets of Creativity: What Neuroscience, the Arts, and Our Minds Reveal. Edited by Suzanne Nalbantian and Paul M. Matthews, Oxford University Press (2019). © Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190462321.003.0006 108 Creativity and the Brain Berger’s prescient insight is strongly supported by an examination of the cost of brain function. In the average adult human, the brain represents about 2% of the total body weight yet it accounts for 20% of all the energy consumed,3 which is ten times that predicted by its weight alone. The energy cost of the developing human brain, which peaks at approximately the end of the first decade of life, approaches 50% of the total body energy consumption,4 which calls attention to the role of metabolism in brain development and plasticity across the lifespan, a subject relevant to creativity and one to which I will return later in this chapter. To put the high cost of intrinsic activity in perspective, it is important to note that the additional energy consumption associated with task- induced changes in brain activity is remarkably small, often less than 5% of a baseline level of activity locally.5 From these data it is clear that the brain’s enormous energy consumption is largely devoted to its intrinsic activity and little affected by task performance, an observation first made more than fifty years ago by Louis Sokoloff, Seymour Kety, and their colleagues6 but rarely cited. What other operational features attest to the functional importance of intrinsic activity? The processing of sensory information immediately comes to mind. As I sit before my computer composing this chapter, occasionally gazing out the window or surveying my office with its many interesting objects, I have no doubt about the richness of the details in the scene before me. Alas, it is an illu- sion! William James was one of the first to call attention to this fact,7 remarking that “Enough has now been said to prove the general law of perception, which is this, that whilst part of what we perceive comes through our senses from the object before us, another part (and it may be the larger part) always comes (in Lazarus’s phrase) out of our own head.” More recently, the late Vernon Mountcastle, one of the twentieth century’s preeminent neurophysiologists, summed up the situation nicely: “Each of us believes himself to live directly within the world that surrounds him, to sense its objects and events precisely, and to live in real and current time. I assert that these are perceptual illusions. Sensation is an abstraction, not a replication, of the real world.”8 What facts sup- port such counterintuitive assertions? Complementary information comes from a consideration of the amount of sensory information made available to the brain. For example, it may surprise some to learn that visual information is significantly compressed as it passes from the eye to the visual cortex.9 Thus, of the information available from the environ- ment, only about 1010 bits/ s (i.e., 10 billion bits/s) are deposited in the retina. Yet, only 104 bits/ s (i.e., 0.001% of that which was deposited on the retina) make it to primary visual cortex. These data make it clear that visual cortex receives a very compressed representation of the world, a subject of more than passing interest to those seeking an understanding of visual information processing.10 Creativity and the Brain’s Default Mode Network 109 Parenthetically, it should be noted that estimates of the bandwidth of con- scious awareness itself (i.e., what we “see”) are in the range of 100 bits/ s or less.11 As Arthur Schopenhauer noted some time ago, “Consciousness is the mere sur- face of our mind, of which, as of the earthly globe, we do not know the interior, but only the crust.”12 One might add that from within the reservoir of the uncon- scious comes the makings of the “aha” moments of creativity.13 Given this striking perspective, it is interesting to look at research on the visual cortex of experimental animals during a nonstimulated state. What emerges is the appearance of a highly organized preparatory state. In a series of papers on the cat visual cortex using a combination of electrode recording and voltage sensitive dyes from the Weizmann Institute beginning in 1995,14 it was shown that the magnitude of ongoing intrinsic activity was the same as evoked activity and that the two interacted strongly, with the intrinsic activity contributing significantly to the variability in evoked activity, thus confirming an observation made many years before by George Bishop and Karl Lashley.15 And, even in the absence of stimuli, cortical representations of visual attributes emerged from the ongoing spontaneous activity.16 Elegant replications and extensions of this work have been contributed by others.17 Conceptual work on how these “simulations” might actually function has been provided by Schroeder and colleagues.18 Thus, combining a variety of perspectives on intrinsic activity reveals common themes at the cellular level and the full-brain, human systems level. At a very local level, at least in sensory cortices, intrinsic activity is functionally organized into the cortical representations of anticipated sensory attributes. At the human full- brain level, intrinsic activity is organized into systems well known for their participation in the full range of overt behaviors19 and prone, as well, to antici- pate incoming sensory information in preparation for responding.20 All of this work echoes prescient views of earlier scholars of brain function such as Thomas Huxley, Henry Maudsley, and William James.21 One of the pivotal events in moving us forward along these lines was the dis- covery of a large- scale, functional network organized within and potentially dominant over the brain’s intrinsic activity. I am referring to the brain’s DMN, whose discovery was an event of pure serendipity. The Default Mode Network The brain’s DMN was probably the most unexpected discovery of early func- tional imaging of the human brain. Anatomically, the DMN consists of a group of rather widely separated areas of the cerebral cortex (Figure 5.1A and 5.1C). 110 Creativity and the Brain (D) (A) (B) (E) (C) Figure 5.1 The group of brain areas (A) that decrease their activity during performance of a wide variety of tasks are often referred together as the brain’s default mode network (DMN). The spontaneous functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI) blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal activity in the resting state (arrows, A) shows a remarkable similarity between regions of the DMN (B). For example, asking the general question of what areas in the brain are correlated with the activity in the back of the DMN (light arrow in [A] , light curve in [B]) reveals the entire DMN network (C). Analyses of other brain systems reveal similar levels of functional organization (D). Additional analyses suggest how resting-state activity propagates within and among brain networks. The image (E) shows anticorrelated relationships between the DMN and other systems collectively referred to as the task positive networks (TPNs), mediated by connectivity between the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and the frontal eye fields (FEF). A–D adapted from Marcus Raichle, “The Restless Brain, How Intrinsic Activity Organizes Brain Function,”PhilosTrans R Soc B 370 (2015): 1– 11. E adapted from Michael Fox, et al., “The Human Brain Is Organized into Dynamic, Anticorrelated Functional Networks,” PNAS 102 (2005): 9673– 9678. Yet, despite their anatomical separation, the components of the DMN behave as a unit. Many readers of this chapter, especially those not working in the field of cog- nitive neuroscience, will immediately wonder what functionality the DMN instantiates and what it has to do with creativity.
Recommended publications
  • The Epistemology of Evidence in Cognitive Neuroscience1
    To appear in In R. Skipper Jr., C. Allen, R. A. Ankeny, C. F. Craver, L. Darden, G. Mikkelson, and R. Richardson (eds.), Philosophy and the Life Sciences: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. The Epistemology of Evidence in Cognitive Neuroscience1 William Bechtel Department of Philosophy and Science Studies University of California, San Diego 1. The Epistemology of Evidence It is no secret that scientists argue. They argue about theories. But even more, they argue about the evidence for theories. Is the evidence itself trustworthy? This is a bit surprising from the perspective of traditional empiricist accounts of scientific methodology according to which the evidence for scientific theories stems from observation, especially observation with the naked eye. These accounts portray the testing of scientific theories as a matter of comparing the predictions of the theory with the data generated by these observations, which are taken to provide an objective link to reality. One lesson philosophers of science have learned in the last 40 years is that even observation with the naked eye is not as epistemically straightforward as was once assumed. What one is able to see depends upon one’s training: a novice looking through a microscope may fail to recognize the neuron and its processes (Hanson, 1958; Kuhn, 1962/1970).2 But a second lesson is only beginning to be appreciated: evidence in science is often not procured through simple observations with the naked eye, but observations mediated by complex instruments and sophisticated research techniques. What is most important, epistemically, about these techniques is that they often radically alter the phenomena under investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook Magazine, Autumn 2018
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Outlook Magazine Washington University Publications 2018 Outlook Magazine, Autumn 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/outlook Recommended Citation Outlook Magazine, Autumn 2018. Central Administration, Medical Public Affairs. Bernard Becker Medical Library Archives. Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri. https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/outlook/188 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington University Publications at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Outlook Magazine by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AUTUMN 2018 Elevating performance BERNARD BECKER MEDICAL LIBRARY BECKER BERNARD outlook.wustl.edu Outlook 3 Atop the Karakoram Mountains, neurologist Marcus Raichle, MD, (center) displays a Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology banner he created. In 1987, he and other members of a British expedition climbed 18,000 feet above sea level — and then injected radioactive xenon to see how it diffused through their brains. Raichle, 81, has been a central force for decades in the history and science of brain imaging. See page 7. FEATURES MATT MILLER MATT 7 Mysteries explored Pioneering neurologist Marcus Raichle, MD, opened up the human brain to scientific investigation. 14 Growing up transgender The Washington University Transgender Center helps families navigate the complex world of gender identity. COVER Scott Brandon, who sustained a spinal cord injury 16 years ago, said he is 21 Building independence grateful to the Program in Occupational For 100 years, the Program in Occupational Therapy has Therapy for helping him build physical and helped people engage mind and body.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2018 MSK Takes a Lead Role in Interventional Oncology FSFOCAL
    FOCAL SPOT FS FALL 2018 MSK Takes a Lead Role in Interventional Oncology MALLINCKRODT INSTITUTE OF RADIOLOGY // WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY // ST. LOUIS CONTENTS 10 A look at 10 MIR professors RAD who are helping lead the way for women in radiology. (From left: Geetika Khanna, MD, Pamela K. WOMEN Woodard, MD, and Farrokh Dehdashti, MD) 6 16 20 LIFE-ALTERING MYSTERIES MIR ALUMNI TREATMENT EXPLAINED WEEKEND MSK imaging chief Jack Jennings, Thirty years later, Marcus E. Raichle, Old friends, new stories and a sweet MD, provides quality-of-life improving MD, remains a central figure in the serenade from Ronald G. Evens, MD. procedures for patients with cancer. science of brain imaging. Inside MIR’s first reunion. Cover Photo: Metastatic melanoma patient Chris Plummer still works his farm every day, thanks to treatment resulting in unprecedented control of his tumors. 2 SPOT NEWS 24 ALUMNI SPOTLIGHT FOCAL SPOT MAGAZINE FALL 2018 Editor: Marie Spadoni Photography: Mickey Wynn, Daniel Drier Design: Kim Kania YI F A LOOK BACK ©2018 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology 26 28 mir.wustl.edu FOCAL SPOT MAGAZINE // 1 SPOT NEWS David H. Ballard, MD, a TOP-TIER participant, uses 3D printing in his translational imaging work. Training the Next Generation of Imaging Scientists by Kristin Rattini For young scientists eager to make their way to the forefront in clinical translational imaging research and bringing of translational research and precision imaging, Mallinckrodt innovation to the practice of medicine. The interdisciplinary Institute of Radiology (MIR) offers a clear path. A leader in grant provides two training slots per year in years one NIH funding, MIR is home to premier training programs and and two, and three slots in years three through five.
    [Show full text]
  • The Photographerls Guide to The
    THE PHOTOGRAPHER’S GUIDE TO THE EYE EYES—NOSTRILS—LIPS—SHINY THINGS. My eyes scanned the photo of two women almost the way a monkey’s would, going first to the faces, specifically features that WHAT SCIENCE IS would indicate friend, foe, or possible mate, then to the brightest objects in the image: a blue bottle, a pendant. Surprisingly, it took LEARNING ABOUT HOW forever (almost three seconds) for me to look at the famous—and famously gorgeous—face in the photo, Angelina Jolie. WE SEE CAN HELP YOU In this impulsive type of seeing, called “bottom-up,” my eyes went first to the face of the other woman in the picture until I consciously ordered them to spend time on Jolie—“top-down TAKE MORE COMPELLING attentional deployment” in scientific lingo. That’s because, researchers have found, we recognize culture-defined beauty only PICTURES after taking the reflexive glances all primate eyes perform within the first few milliseconds. In other words, we see first with our BY NEAL MATTHEWS animal selves and then with our acculturated minds. We process visual information very quickly, as the brain electronically parcels parts of images to different cortical areas concerned with faces, colors, shapes, motion, and many other aspects of a scene, where they are broken down even further. Then the brain puts all that information back together into a coherent composite before directing the eyes to move. My eye tracks were being recorded by vision researcher Laurent Itti, an associate professor of computer science, psychology, and neuroscience at the University of Southern California’s iLab (ilab.usc.edu).
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewers [PDF]
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 2013, 33(1) Acknowledgement For Reviewers 2012 The Editors depend heavily on outside reviewers in forming opinions about papers submitted to the Journal and would like to formally thank the following individuals for their help during the past year. Kjersti Aagaard Frederic Ambroggi Craig Atencio Izhar Bar-Gad Esther Aarts Céline Amiez Coleen Atkins Jose Bargas Michelle Aarts Bagrat Amirikian Lauren Atlas Steven Barger Lawrence Abbott Nurith Amitai David Attwell Cornelia Bargmann Brandon Abbs Yael Amitai Etienne Audinat Michael Barish Keiko Abe Martine Ammasari-Teule Anthony Auger Philip Barker Nobuhito Abe Katrin Amunts Vanessa Auld Neal Barmack Ted Abel Costas Anastassiou Jesús Avila Gilad Barnea Ute Abraham Beau Ances Karen Avraham Carol Barnes Wickliffe Abraham Richard Andersen Gautam Awatramani Steven Barnes Andrey Abramov Søren Andersen Edward Awh Sue Barnett Hermann Ackermann Adam Anderson Cenk Ayata Michael Barnett-Cowan David Adams Anne Anderson Anthony Azevedo Kevin Barnham Nii Addy Clare Anderson Rony Azouz Scott Barnham Arash Afraz Lucy Anderson Hiroko Baba Colin J. Barnstable Ariel Agmon Matthew Anderson Luiz Baccalá Scott Barnum Adan Aguirre Susan Anderson Stephen Baccus Ralf Baron Geoffrey Aguirre Anuska Andjelkovic Stephen A. Back Pascal Barone Ehud Ahissar Rodrigo Andrade Lars Bäckman Maureen Barr Alaa Ahmed Ole Andreassen Aldo Badiani Luis Barros James Aimone Michael Andres David Badre Andreas Bartels Cheryl Aine Michael Andresen Wolfgang Baehr David Bartés-Fas Michael Aitken Stephen Andrews Mathias Bähr Alison Barth Elias Aizenman Thomas Andrillon Bahador Bahrami Markus Barth Katerina Akassoglou Victor Anggono Richard Baines Simon Barthelme Schahram Akbarian Fabrice Ango Jaideep Bains Edward Bartlett Colin Akerman María Cecilia Angulo Wyeth Bair Timothy Bartness Huda Akil Laurent Aniksztejn Victoria Bajo-Lorenzana Marisa Bartolomei Michael Akins Lucio Annunziato David Baker Marlene Bartos Emre Aksay Daniel Ansari Harriet Baker Jason Bartz Kaat Alaerts Mark S.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The space inside the skull : digital representations, brain mapping and cognitive neuroscience in the decade of the brain Beaulieu, J.A. Publication date 2000 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Beaulieu, J. A. (2000). The space inside the skull : digital representations, brain mapping and cognitive neuroscience in the decade of the brain. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Workss Cited Ahhot.. Allison 19922 Confusion about form and function clouds launch of EC's Decade of ihe Brain. Nature. 24 September.. 359: 260. Ackerman.. Sandra 19922 The Role of the Brain in Mental Illness. !n Discovering the Brain. 46-66. Washington. DC:: National Academy Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanni Berlucchi
    BK-SFN-NEUROSCIENCE-131211-03_Berlucchi.indd 96 16/04/14 5:21 PM Giovanni Berlucchi BORN: Pavia, Italy May 25, 1935 EDUCATION: Liceo Classico Statale Ugo Foscolo, Pavia, Maturità (1953) Medical School, University of Pavia, MD (1959) California Institute of Technology, Postdoctoral Fellowship (1964–1965) APPOINTMENTS: University of Pennsylvania (1968) University of Siena (1974) University of Pisa (1976) University of Verona (1983) HONORS AND AWARDS: Academia Europaea (1990) Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (1992) Honorary PhD in Psychology, University of Pavia (2007) After working initially on the neurophysiology of the sleep-wake cycle, Giovanni Berlucchi did pioneering electrophysiological investigations on the corpus callosum and its functional contribution to the interhemispheric transfer of visual information and to the representation of the visual field in the cerebral cortex and the superior colliculus. He was among the first to use reaction times for analyzing hemispheric specializations and interactions in intact and split brain humans. His latest research interests include visual spatial attention and the representation of the body in the brain. BK-SFN-NEUROSCIENCE-131211-03_Berlucchi.indd 97 16/04/14 5:21 PM Giovanni Berlucchi Family and Early Years A man’s deepest roots are where he has spent the enchanted days of his childhood, usually where he was born. My deepest roots lie in the ancient Lombard city of Pavia, where I was born 78 years ago, on May 25, 1935, and in that part of the province of Pavia that lies to the south of the Po River and is called the Oltrepò Pavese. The hilly part of the Oltrepò is covered with beautiful vineyards that according to archaeological and historical evidence have been used to produce good wines for millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Encoding with Visual Attention
    Neural encoding with visual attention Meenakshi Khosla1;∗, Gia H. Ngo1, Keith Jamison3, Amy Kuceyeski3;4 and Mert R. Sabuncu1;2;3 1 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 2 Nancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 3 Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065 4 Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065 ∗ Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Visual perception is critically influenced by the focus of attention. Due to limited re- sources, it is well known that neural representations are biased in favor of attended locations. Using concurrent eye-tracking and functional Magnetic Resonance Imag- ing (fMRI) recordings from a large cohort of human subjects watching movies, we first demonstrate that leveraging gaze information, in the form of attentional masking, can significantly improve brain response prediction accuracy in a neural encoding model. Next, we propose a novel approach to neural encoding by includ- ing a trainable soft-attention module. Using our new approach, we demonstrate that it is possible to learn visual attention policies by end-to-end learning merely on fMRI response data, and without relying on any eye-tracking. Interestingly, we find that attention locations estimated by the model on independent data agree well with the corresponding eye fixation patterns, despite no explicit supervision to do so. Together, these findings suggest that attention modules can be instrumental in neural encoding models of visual stimuli. 1 1 Introduction Developing accurate population-wide neural encoding models that predict the evoked brain response directly from sensory stimuli has been an important goal in computational neuroscience.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis for Science Librarians of the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology Or Medicine: the Life and Work of John O’Keefe, Edvard Moser, and May-Britt Moser
    Analysis for Science Librarians of the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: The Life and Work of John O’Keefe, Edvard Moser, and May-Britt Moser Neyda V. Gilman Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Navigation and awareness of space is a complicated cognitive process that requires sensory input and calculation, as well as spatial memory. The 2014 Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine, John O’Keefe, Edvard Moser, and May-Britt Moser, have worked to explain how an environmental map forms and is used in the brain (Nobelprize.org 2014b). O’Keefe discovered place cells that allow the brain to learn and remember specific locations. The Mosers added the second part of the “positioning system in the brain” with their discovery of grid cells, which provide the brain with a navigational coordinate system (Nobelprize.org 2014b). Introduction Alfred Nobel dictated in his will that his millions were to be used to create the Nobel Foundation in order to fund Nobel Prizes, the first of which was awarded in 1901 (Nobelprize.org 2014g). The Prize for Physiology or Medicine is given to those who are found to have made a major discovery that changes scientific thinking and benefits mankind. Between 1901 and 1953 there were over 5,000 individuals nominated for the Physiology or Medicine prize, less than seventy of which eventually became Laureates. For the 2014 Prize alone, 263 scientists were nominated (Nobelprize.org 2014h). The prize is not meant to honor those who are seen as leaders in the scientific community or those who have made many achievements over their lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Feature-Based Attention Is Independent of Object Appearance
    Journal of Vision (2014) 14(1):3, 1–11 http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/1/3 1 Feature-based attention is independent of object appearance Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital and Tongji Eye Institute, Guobei Xiao Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital and Tongji Eye Institute, Guotong Xu Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital and Tongji Eye Institute, Xiaoqing Liu Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital and Tongji Eye Institute, Jingying Xu Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital and Tongji Eye Institute, Fang Wang Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital and Tongji Eye Institute, Li Li Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Computer Science Department and Neuroscience Graduate Laurent Itti Program, University of Southern California $ Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, The Advanced Institute of Translational Medicine and School of Software Engineering, Jianwei Lu Tongji University, Shanghai, China $ How attention interacts with low-level visual luminance discrimination task on one side, and ignored representations to give rise to perception remains a the other side, where we probed for enhanced activity central yet controversial question in neuroscience. While when either it was perceived as belonging to a same several previous studies suggest that the units of object, or shared features with the task side.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Mind, Second Edition
    Praise for THE DEVELOPING MIND “A tour de force of synthesis and integration. Siegel has woven a rich tapestry that provides a compelling account of how our interpersonal worlds and neural systems form two important pillars of the mind. The second edition brings the latest neuroscientific evidence to the fore; it is a ‘must read’ for any student or professional interested in mental health, child development, and the brain.” —RICHA R D J. DAVIDSON , PhD, William James and Vilas Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry; Founder and Chair, Center for Investigating Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin–Madison “With the original publication of The Developing Mind, the field of interpersonal neurobiology was born. Siegel’s genius for synthesizing and humanizing neu- roscience, attachment, and developmental theory made the book a bestseller and attracted thousands to this new field. The second edition benefits from over a decade’s worth of additional findings, reflections, ideas, and insights. I encourage you to take Siegel up on his offer to share this fascinating journey, whether for the first time or for a return trip. You won’t be disappointed.” —LOUIS COZO L INO , PhD, Department of Psychology, Pepperdine University “When The Developing Mind was first published, Siegel’s proposal that mind, brain, and relationships represented ‘three aspects of one reality’ essential to human well-being still seemed closer to inspired speculation than teachable scientific knowledge. Just over a decade later, the neurobiology of interpersonal experience has grown into one of the hottest areas of psychological research. Over two thousand new references surveyed for the second edition testify to just how far neuroscientists, developmental psychologists, and clinicians have brought the field as they begin to more fully chart the interplay of mind, body, and relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Brain This Page Intentionally Left Blank Explaining the Brain Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience
    Explaining the Brain This page intentionally left blank Explaining the Brain Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience Carl F. Craver CLARENDON PRESS · OXFORD 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Craver 2007 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Craver, Carl F.
    [Show full text]