DOCSLIB.ORG

Symposium on Corporate Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Symposium on Corporate Elections ISSN 1045-6333 HARVARD JOHN M. OLIN CENTER FOR LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS SYMPOSIUM ON CORPORATE ELECTIONS Lucian Bebchuk, editor Discussion Paper No. 448 11/2003 Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 The Center for Law, Economics, and Business is supported by a grant from the John M. Olin Foundation. This paper can be downloaded without charge from: The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/ The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract =471640 This paper is also a discussion paper of the John M. Olin Center's Program on Corporate Governance . Symposium on Corporate Elections Lucian Bebchuk, editor Abstract This paper contains the proceedings of the Symposium on Corporate Elections held at Harvard Law School in October 2003. The symposium brought together SEC officials, CEOs, directors, institutional investors, money managers, shareholder activists, lawyers, judges, academics, and others to discuss the subject from a wide range of perspectives. The symposium included six sessions. The first session focused on the basic pros and cons of shareholder access. It featured a presentation and discussion of two papers: “Election Contests in the Company’s Proxy: An Idea whose Time has not Come” by Martin Lipton and Steven Rosenblum, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; and “Shareholder Access to the Ballot” by Lucian Bebchuk, Harvard Law School. The second session focused on the perspective of boards and management. The panel speakers were Richard Breeden (Chairman, Richard C. Breeden & Co.), John Castellani (President, The Business Roundtable), James Rogers (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Cinergy Corp.), and Ralph Whitworth (Chairman of the Board, Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.). The third session focused on the perspective of institutional investors. The panel speakers were Orin Kramer (Partner, Kramer Spellman, L.P.A), Robert Pozen (Visiting Professor of Law from Practice, Harvard Law School and formerly Vice-Chair, Fidelity Investments), Michael Price (Managing Partner, MFP Investments) and Sarah Teslik (Executive Director, Council for Institutional Investors). The fourth session of the symposium focused on the perspective of shareholder activists and advisers. Panelists were Jaime Heard (Chief Executive Officer, Institutional Shareholder Services), Robert Monks (Founder, Lens Governance Advisors), Damon Silvers (Associate General Counsel, AFL-CIO), and John Wilcox (Vice Chairman, Georgeson Shareholders). The fifth session focused on legal problems in designing a shareholder access rule. The panel speakers were John Coffee (Professor of Law, Columbia Law School), Joseph Grundfest (Professor of Law and Business, Stanford Law School), Robert Todd Lang (Senior Partner, Weil, Gotshal & Manges), Charles Nathan (Partner, Latham & Watkins), and Leo Strine (Vice Chancellor, Delaware Chancery Court). The final session featured concluding remarks. The speakers were Robert Clark (Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor and Professor of Law, Harvard Law School), Floyd Norris (Chief Financial Correspondent, The New York Times), and Harvey Goldschmid (Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission). Each session started with opening presentations by the panelists, followed by a discussion among the panelists and between the panelists and other participants in the symposium. Key words: corporate governance, directors, shareholders, shareholder voting, corporate elections, proxy fights, proxy contests, proxy rules, corporate elections, SEC. JEL classification: D70, G30, G32, G34, G38, K22. © Lucian Bebchuk 2003. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Editor’s Note i List of Speakers ii Session 1: The Basic Pros and Cons of Shareholder Access ………………………1 Panelists: Martin Lipton and Steven Rosenblum, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Lucian Bebchuk, Harvard Law School Session 2: The Board/Management Perspective……………………………………30 Panelists: Richard Breeden, Richard C. Breeden & Co. John Castellani, The Business Roundtable James Rogers, Cinergy Inc. Ralph Whitworth, Apria Healthcare Group Session 3: The Perspective of Institutional Investors…………………………… 53 Panelists: Orin Kramer , Kramer Spellman Robert Pozen, Harvard Law School Michael Price, MFP Investors Sarah Teslik, Council for Institutional Investors Session 4: The Perspective of Shareholder Activists and Advisers……………..74 Panelists: Jaime Heard, Institutional Shareholder Services Robert Monks, Lens Governance Advisors Damon Silvers, AFL-CIO John Wilcox, Georgeson Shareholders Session 5: Legal Problems in Designing a Shareholder Access Rule………...…96 Panelists: John Coffee, Columbia Law School Joseph Grundfest, Stanford Law Schoool Robert Todd Lang, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Charles Nathan, Latham & Watkins Leo Strine, Delaware Chancery Court Session 6: Concluding Remarks…………………………………………………….117 Panelists: Robert Clark, Harvard Law School Floyd Norris, The New York Times Harvey Goldschmid, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Editor’s Note: This edited transcript seeks to make publicly available the proceedings of the Symposium on Shareholder Access to the Ballot that was held at Harvard Law School on October 3, 2003. Editing was done by the speakers and the editor, with the aim of retaining the spirit of the symposium while ensuring that the speaker’s message is clearly and accurately conveyed to readers. The conference was the first event of the recently established Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance. It was sponsored by the Program and by the Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business. I wish to thank Professor Steve Shavell, the director of the Olin Center, and Dean Elena Kagan for their support. I am also grateful to various colleagues for their help in organizing the symposium and moderating its sessions, including John Coates, Brian Hall, Howell Jackson, Reinier Kraakman, Jay Lorsch, and Guhan Subramanian; special thanks go to Mark Roe for his advice and encouragement throughout. Finally, for their help in administering the symposium as well as in preparing its proceedings, I am grateful to Erica George, Julie Johnson, Kiwi Kamara, and Rob Maynes. i List of Speakers Panelists, Moderators, and Discussion Participants Lucian Bebchuk, Harvard Law School Alan Beller, U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission Matthew Bishop, The Economist Richard Breeden, Richard C. Breeden & Co. John Castellani, The Business Roundtable Robert Clark, Harvard Law School John Coates, Harvard Law School John Coffee, Columbia Law School Jill Fisch, Fordham University School of Law Harvey Goldschmid, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Joseph Grundfest, Stanford Law School Brian Hall, Harvard Business School Paul Healy, Harvard Business School Jamie Heard, Institutional Shareholder Services Howell Jackson, Harvard Law School Reinier Kraakman, Harvard Law School Orin Kramer , Kramer Spellman Robert Todd Lang, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Jay Lorsch, Harvard Business School Robert Monks, Lens Governance Advisors Charles Nathan, Latham & Watkins LLP Floyd Norris, The New York Times Robert Pozen, Harvard Law School Michael Price, MFP Investors Mark Roe, Harvard Law School James Rogers, Cinergy Inc. Steven Rosenblum, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Damon Silvers, AFL-CIO Leo Strine, Delaware Court of Chancery Guhan Subramanian, Harvard Law School Sarah Teslik, Council for Institutional Investors Ralph Whitworth, Apria Healthcare Group and Relational Investors John Wilcox, Georgeson Shareholder ii Session 1: The Basic Pros and Cons of Shareholder Access to the Ballot Panelists: Martin Lipton and Steven Rosenblum, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Lucian Bebchuk, Harvard Law School Moderator: Mark Roe, Harvard Law School Discussion Participants: Robert Monks, Lens Governance Advisors Brian Hall, Harvard Business School Jay Lorsch, Harvard Business School Charles Nathan, Latham & Watkins LLP Joseph Grundfest, Stanford Law School Matthew Bishop, The Economist Allen Beller, U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission Michael Price, MFP Investors Leo Strine, Delaware Court of Chancery Mark Roe: I’m Mark Roe; I’m going to moderate our first panel. Just a few introductory comments; the people on the panel don’t need any introduction. The mechanics: Marty and Steve will talk for about twenty minutes on their topics. Lucian will talk for about twenty minutes on his topic. There’ve been heavy negotiations on the moderator’s authority, and I have much more authority than is typical. I have this bell to keep people quiet after twenty minutes, or if the questions go on too long. After twenty minutes, we’ll have a few minutes of response on either side, and then questions to the people presenting the papers. I think it’s fair to say that Marty Lipton’s been, of the last 25-35 years, the most articulate, thoughtful spokesman for the view of maintaining managerial autonomy in large firms, and Lucian has provided several of the deepest analyses of why firms would be better-run with more authority moved to shareholders’ hands. There’s a surreal quality about addressing these issues today, in that we know the SEC is going to propose a rule that 1 we’re going to be talking about today, but we don’t know the details of the rule, so we can’t focus on details. We can only focus on the big picture. And the surreal quality, I think, corresponds to the panel this morning. In some ways, the big picture is clear. We kind of know what
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ron and Tracey Lockard
    For progress. For patients.® ® theBAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATIONtorch D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 0 Special Edition Simmons $20 million gift to benefit, rename transplant institute nnette and Harold Simmons have pledged $20 million to benefit transplantation initiatives within Baylor Health Care System. In recognitionA of this transformational gift, Baylor will rename the Baylor Regional Transplant Institute the Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute. “Because of our own experience with transplan- Joel Allison, Dr. Göran Klintmalm and tation, we knew we wanted to give others the same Norm and Robin Bagwell and Rowland K. Robinson with a portrait of Dr. Göran and Tina Dr. Göran Klintmalm Harold and Annette Simmons Klintmalm opportunity to have a future,” Harold Simmons said. “We believe this gift will enable Baylor to make our vision a reality by advancing transplant science and creating one of the finest transplant institutes in the nation.” “This generous gift will help us continue to pro- vide life-changing treatments for transplant patients and conduct leading-edge clinical research that will further advance knowledge in the field of transplantation,” said Joel Allison, Rowland K. Robinson, Dr. Göran Klintmalm Dr. Robert and Amanda and Norm Bagwell ring the bell, a Foundation president and chief executive officer of Baylor Goldstein Erle Nye and Joel Allison tradition when good news is announced Health Care System. “Baylor is most grateful for the generosity of the Simmons family that will education and academic contributions on behalf “We are grateful beyond words for the incred- provide us the opportunity to impact our patients’ of our patients,” said Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Candidate He Supreme Court’S Chief Rationale in Its Decision to Permit Unlimited Corporate T Spending to Influence Elections in Citizens United V
    October 24, 2012 www.citizen.org Super Connected Super PACs’ Devotion to Individual Candidates Undercuts Assumption in Citizens United That Outside Spending Would Be ‘Independent’ Acknowledgments This report was written by Taylor Lincoln, research director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. Congress Watch Legislative Assistant Kelly Ngo assisted with research. Congress Watch Director Lisa Gilbert edited the report. Public Citizen Litigation Group Senior Attorney Scott Nelson provided expert advice. Also, the report draws in part from a May 2012 amicus brief to the Supreme Court that was coauthored by Nelson. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 300,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Methodology Data analyzed in this report were drawn from the Center for Responsive Politics (www.opensecrets.org) and the Sunlight Foundation (http://sunlightfoundation.com). Except where indicated, expenditure and contribution data are as of Oct. 16, 2012. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org © 2012 Public Citizen. Public Citizen Super Connected I. Most Super PACs Back a Single Candidate he Supreme Court’s chief rationale in its decision to permit unlimited corporate T spending to influence elections in Citizens United v.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 44 Issue 2 Article 14 10-2006 Book Reviews Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation (2006) "Book Reviews," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 44 : Iss. 2 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol44/iss2/14 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 66 EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION BOOK REVIEWS Choice, Persuasion, and Coercion: Social Control on Spain's North American Frontiers, Jesus F. de la Teja and Ross Frank, editors (University of New Mexico Press, MSC 11 6290, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001) 2005. Contents. Glossary. Biblio. Contributors. Index. P. 338. $24.95, Paperback. h is not possible in a brief review to critique eleven chapters by contrib­ utors to this anthology. What follows is a description ofits contents and a com­ ment on its editing. The subtitle is vitally important in understanding the focus of this work. Instruments ofsocial control in broad context are examined in Spain's colonies within what became the United States - Florida, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, and Alta (Upper) California. Also included are locations across the northern tier of states in present-day Mexico - Nueva Vizcaya, Northeastern New Spain, Sonora, Saltillo, and Nuevo Santander. An additional chapter touches on North America only tangentially in that it examines the complex question of who controlled the king of Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decision to Overturn Austin Would Not Only Radically Alter the Conduct
    No. 11-1179 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. STEVE BULLOCK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MONTANA, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT N.Y.U. SCHOOL OF LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSORS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS J. ADAM SKAGGS Counsel of Record MICHAEL WALDMAN MIMI MARZIANI IAN VANDEWALKER DAVID EARLEY BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT N.Y.U. SCHOOL OF LAW 161 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10013 (646) 292-8331 [email protected] May 18, 2012 Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT..................................... 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. WHETHER UNCOORDINATED POLITICAL SPENDING CAN GIVE RISE TO REAL OR APPARENT CORRUPTION IS A QUESTION OF FACT, NOT LAW. ........................................... 3 A. Montana has dual compelling interests in preventing corruption and the appearance of corruption. .................................................... 3 B. Whether and how independent spending gives rise to corruption or its appearance are questions of fact, not law. ......................... 5 II. SPENDING BY INDEPENDENT GROUPS CAN GIVE RISE TO CORRUPTION AND PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF CORRUPTION. .... 8 A. Citizens United has been extended to create groups that are inextricably connected with candidate campaigns, but allowed to solicit and accept unlimited contributions. .................................................... 9 B. Disproportionate spending by independent groups has given rise to concerns about corruption and its appearance. ...................... 19 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 29 APPENDIX: LIST OF AMICI CURIAE ................. A-1 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Ariz.Free Enter.
    [Show full text]
  • Shareholder Access to the Proxy Revisited
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 40 Issue 1 Fall 1990 Article 4 1990 Shareholder Access to the Proxy Revisited Jayne W. Barnard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Jayne W. Barnard, Shareholder Access to the Proxy Revisited, 40 Cath. U. L. Rev. 37 (1991). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol40/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHAREHOLDER ACCESS TO THE PROXY REVISITED Jayne W. Barnard* We have an interesting situation in which large institutions are re- jecting the old Wall Street rule because their holdings are [now] large enough that it makes economic sense for them to spend time and money protecting the governance power associated with their shareholdings.... In the future, you'll... see pension funds be- coming even more aggressive in perhaps nominating their own can- didates for boards of directors and asking more pointed, specific questions about the operation of the corporation.' One of the goals underlying the enactment of the Securities Exchange Act of 19342 was to reduce management's domination of corporate boards of directors. In enacting Section 14 of the Exchange Act,3 Congress hoped to ensure shareholders an informed and constructive role in the selection and oversight of corporate directors.4 The Securities and Exchange Commis- sion's (SEC or Commission) application and enforcement of Section 14 has only partially achieved that result.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY 20 on THEHILLTOP 13 €‚ ƒ„ƒ †‡ˆ No Volume Sixty-Three INTHIS ISSUE 01
    TOP TIAL LL ORY EN ID ES THEHI ST PR ON HI SMU MAGAZINE CE LEBRATIN G FOUNDERS’DAY HONORIN G JFK’SLEGACY SPRING/SUMMER 20 13 No Volume Sixty-Three IN THIS ISSUE 01 TALK OFTHE CAMPUS Features Pg. 14 CEL E BR AT ING A Presidential LIBRARIES Welcome DURING ,SMU COMMEMORATES The 43rd president of the United THE YEAR OF THE LIBRARY, A States was the surprise guest of CELEBRATION OF LIBRARY FIRSTS AND honor at a colorful, music-lled OF THE CONTINUEDIMPORTANCE OF ceremony on the main quad THE LIBRARIES TO INTELLECTUAL welcoming the George W. Bush LIFE PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITIONS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR WILL PROVIDE Presidential Center to campus OPPORTUNITIES TO DISCOVER THE RICH on Founders’ Day April 19. RESOURCES AND ONE OF A KIND COLLECTIONS HOUSED IN THE NINE FACILITIES THEY CONSTITUTETHE LARGEST PRIVATE ACADEMIC LIBRARY SYSTEM IN THE SOUTHWEST PAGE ON THE COVER Photo by Paul Morse Experts On Loan Expanding Education All ve living SMU faculty and students provided Annee and Harold Simmons made a new presidents of the expertise to Dallas’ new Perot Museum $25 million gi to SMU’s Simmons School United States gathered for the of Nature and Science, including SMU of Education and Human Development dedication of the paleontologist Louis Jacobs, shown with to fund another building and positions George W. Bush Malawisaurus Presidential Center a model of the that he for the school’s expanding programs. April 25, making discovered in Africa. history for the Bush Center and SMU. page 06 page 08 / 2013 Departments 02 To Our Readers Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • SMU COX DEAN MATTHEW B. MYERS Give Your Resume More Teeth
    SMU • COX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS FALL 2017 SMU COX DEAN MATTHEW B. MYERS Give Your Resume More Teeth. Earn a One-Year Master’s Degree in: Accounting • Business Analytics • Finance • Management • Sport Management Shape your professional skills. Access more than 40,000 alumni in 80 countries. Take your career to new heights. Learn more at coxmasters.com SMU does not discriminate in any program or activity on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, genetic information, veteran status, sexual orientation or gender identity and expression. FEATURES FALL 2017 3 DEAN 16 The Dawn of a New Dean Matthew B. Myers ASSISTANT DEAN OF EXTERNAL 20 Q&A with Dean Myers RELATIONS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COX ALUMNI ASSOCIATION Kevin Knox 28 Faculty Research ASSISTANT DEAN OF MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF CONTENT Lynda Welch Oliver DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT 2 From the Dean Ashley Pitts 14 ASSISTANT EDITOR 3 Program News Lacey Jeffrey 14 Graduation CONTRIBUTORS Anna Martinez 16 The Dawn of a New Dean Jennifer Warren PHOTOGRAPHERS 20 Q&A with Dean Myers Dean Dominguez Hillsman Jackson 21 #DeanMyersDiscoversDallas Ren Morrison 22 Faculty and Staff Achievements HOW TO REACH US Marketing and Communications Office 26 New Faculty Cox School of Business Southern Methodist University 16 28 Faculty Research PO Box 750333 Dallas, TX 75275-0333 32 Development E-mail: [email protected] Website: cox.smu.edu 34 Calendar of Events Main Office: 214.768.3678 35 Alumni Board Fax: 214.768.3267 36 Distinguished Alumni CoxToday design: Wiswall McLain Design 37 Outstanding Young Alumni 38 In the News Southern Methodist University (SMU) will not discriminate in any employment practice, 21 39 Executive Board education program, education activity, or admissions on the basis of race, color, 40 Important Numbers religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, genetic information, or veteran status.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Controversy Over Billionaires
    1 The Controversy over Billionaires at the time of his reelection campaign, several conservative billionaires were unhappy with the job performance of President Barack Obama. The economy was not doing well. There was uncertainty in foreign policy. Many of them believed that Obama was a poor leader. Irate about how things were going, they decided to devote several hundred million dollars to defeating the president. Individuals such as Sheldon Adelson, David and Charles Koch, and the late Harold Simmons and a group of wealthy donors assembled by Republican strategist Karl Rove felt that they needed to speak out to ensure that the country had stronger leadership and moved in what they considered a better direction. But they were not the only super-wealthy people who were politically active. In recent elections, there has been an explosion of activism by the rich. Billionaires such as Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, and Tom Steyer have poured extensive resources into supporting their favored candidates and causes. In addition, wealthy individuals have bankrolled advocacy campaigns at the state level— for example, in support of same-sex marriage and mari- juana legalization or in opposition to Obama’s health care reform and higher taxes on the wealthy. Aided by friendly Supreme Court rulings and the rising cost of election campaigns, affluent people 1 2582-4 West CS5 final.indd 1 6/26/14 2:36 PM 2 the Controversy over BillionAires have discovered that they are in a strong position to affect a variety of different issues. In researching this subject, I discovered that it is not just an American development but something that is happening glob- ally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics and Mechanics of Protecting Your Client's Privacy and Personal Security
    Planning for Privacy in a Public World: The Ethics and Mechanics of Protecting Your Client's Privacy and Personal Security By JEFFREY D. CHADWICK Winstead PC 24 Waterway Avenue Suite 500 The Woodlands, TX 77380 600 Travis Street Suite 5200 Houston, TX 77380 281.681.5960 [email protected] Houston Business and Estate Planning Council Houston, Texas April 19, 2018 © 2017 University of Miami School of Law. This outline was originally prepared for the 51st Annual Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning sponsored by the University of Miami School of Law, and published by LexisNexis Mathew Bender. It is reprinted with the permission of the Heckerling Institute and the University of Miami. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. In General ............................................................................................................................................ 1 B. Overview of Materials ......................................................................................................................... 1 C. Common Issues ................................................................................................................................... 2 D. Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Utilizing Revocable Trusts .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BCRA and the 527 Groups
    BCRA and the 527 Groups Steve Weissman and Ruth Hassan Campaign Finance Institute February 9, 2005 Revised March 8, 2005 DRAFT CHAPTER For publication in The Election after Reform: Money, Politics and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Michael J. Malbin, ed., (Rowman and Littlefield, forthcoming) DRAFT CHAPTER Introduction In the wake of the 2004 election, press commentary suggested that rising “527 groups” had undermined the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act’s ban on unlimited corporate, union and individual contributions to political parties and candidates. According to the National Journal, backers of the new law who had “sought to tamp down dire warnings” that close to $500 million in banned soft money “would simply migrate from the parties to 527 organizations” were now “singing a different tune”(Carney 2004). A New York Times editorial lamented that “No sooner had the [campaign finance reform] bill become law than party financiers found a loophole and created groups known as 527s, after the tax-code section that regulated them”(Editorial 2004). The Federal Election Commission (FEC) had refused to subject 527s to contribution restrictions so long as their stirring campaign ads and voter mobilization programs steered clear of formal candidate endorsements such as “Vote for” and “Vote Against.” The result, reported the Washington Post, was a new pattern of soft money giving, with “corporate chieftains and companies such as Microsoft, Boeing and General Electric” displaced as “key contributors” by “two dozen superwealthy and largely unknown men and women… each giving more than $1 million”(Grimaldi 2004). Billionaire George Soros would top the list at $24 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald L. Evans
    Donald L. Evans Don Evans was the 34th secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce, the voice of business in government. Evans was a core member of President George W. Bush’s economic team, advising President Bush on many issues including pro-growth and job-creating economic policies, international trade, business concerns, and energy policy. Evans oversaw a diverse cabinet agency with some 40,000 driving force behind Native Vision, a program that provides services workers and a $5.8 billion budget focused on promoting American to about 10,000 Native American children. He was involved with business, both at home and abroad. The Commerce Department the United Way for many years, serving as president of the Midland gathers vast quantities of economic and demographic data, issues branch in 1989 and campaign chair in 1981. He is also an active patents and trademarks, helps set technical standards, forecasts member of the MD Anderson Board of Visitors as well as their the weather, conducts oceans and coastal zone research, manages Executive Committee. marine fisheries and sanctuaries, enforces international trade laws, In 1997, Evans received the UT Cockrell School of and develops telecommunications and technology policy. Engineering Distinguished Alumnus Award. In December 2001, Born in Houston, in 1946, Evans attended The University of the University of South Carolina awarded Evans an honorary Texas at Austin, receiving a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering Doctor of Humane Letters degree. In September 2002, The in 1969 and an M.B.A. in 1973. During school breaks, he worked University of Texas honored Evans with its Distinguished Alumnus in a Texas steel mill.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan B. Anthony List's
    May 2013 SSuussaann BB.. AAnntthhoonnyy LLiisstt''ss AAnnttii--CChhooiiccee MMaacchhiinnee A Joint Report From The Bridge Project and NARAL Pro-Choice America Introduction Susan B. Anthony List has committed to spending at least $1.5 million on behalf of arch-conservative Virginia gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli, continuing its pattern of support for extreme politicians. Although it is named for the nineteenth-century feminist pioneer, SBA List has little to do with championing the rights of women and everything to do with ending women’s access to abortion, mostly by supporting candidates who are fiercely opposed to reproductive health choices. Using the 2013 Virginia election as a “proving ground” in advance of 2014’s midterm elections, SBA List is testing out electoral strategies that will further President Marjorie Dannenfelser’s vision of an anti-choice “political machine” as impossible to ignore as the National Rifle Association. An ad in April from the SBA List targeting Cuccinelli’s Democratic opponent, Terry McAuliffe, was the first paid advertising of the race. Beyond its efforts in Virginia, SBA List has pledged to focus its upcoming efforts on 12 key states, eight of which will host field offices pursuing electoral and legislative goals. In addition to backing extreme candidates like Todd Akin, who infamously claimed that women are unlikely get pregnant from “legitimate rape” because their bodies have mysterious ways to “shut that whole thing down,” SBA List supports policies in line with its leaders’ radical perspectives on birth control and sex. Instead of endorsing preventive measures that could reduce the need for abortions, Dannenfelser has illogically argued that “contraception and family planning” are responsible for increasing the number of abortions.
    [Show full text]