TROVATO-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TROVATO-DISSERTATION-2017.Pdf Copyright by Adriano Mario Trovato 2017 The Dissertation Committee for Adriano Mario Trovato Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: A Sociophonetic Analysis of Contact Spanish in the United States: Labiodentalization and Labial Consonant Variation Committee: Almeida Jacqueline Toribio, Supervisor Barbara E. Bullock, Co-Supervisor Whitney Chappell Sandro Sessarego A Sociophonetic Analysis of Contact Spanish in the United States: Labiodentalization and Labial Consonant Variation by Adriano Mario Trovato Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2017 A Sociophonetic Analysis of Contact Spanish in the United States: Labiodentalization and Labial Consonant Variation Adriano Mario Trovato, PhD The University of Texas at Austin, 2017 Supervisor: Almeida Jacqueline Toribio; Co-Supervisor: Barbara E. Bullock The term labiodentalization is used in this dissertation to describe the linguistic phenomenon consisting in the realization of /b/, which generally corresponds to the voiced bilabial segments [b] and [β] in Standard varieties of Spanish, as the labiodental fricative consonant [v]. The main goal of this dissertation is to analyze the effects of language contact on labiodentalization of the phoneme /b/ and labial consonant variation in Texas Spanish, with special emphasis on orthography and its influence on bilingual phonology. This project analyzes labial consonant variation in the Spanish of El Paso, Texas, from the perspectives of contact and variationist sociolinguistics. Specifically, it examines (i) if Spanish speakers from El Paso produce an auditorily perceptible distinction between [v] and [β] or [b] as discrete categories; (ii) if they make an acoustically measurable distinction between these categories; and (iii) which sociolinguistic factors condition the use of and the distribution of [v] in the speech community. In pursuing these questions, a hybrid experimental approach that includes auditory and acoustic analyses for a production study is employed. Results reveal that bilingual speakers from El Paso, Texas make an auditorily perceptible distinction between the voiced bilabial and labiodental segments. Moreover, this distinction is correlated with the linguistic variables of consonant orthography and within-word position, while the most relevant social factors in relation to labiodentalization are English writing proficiency level, Spanish writing competence, and gender. Lastly, the best acoustic predictors for labial variation in the dialect examined are relative intensity and duration. iv Table of Contents List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ........................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................1 1.1 Labiodentalization in Spanish ...................................................................2 1.2 Present Study: Motivations and Contributions .........................................4 1.3 Dissertation Structure ..............................................................................10 Chapter 2: Phonology and Phonetics of Spanish Labial Consonants ....................13 2.1 Spanish Labial Phonological Repertoire .................................................13 2.2 Labial Consonants from Old Spanish to Modern Spanish ......................17 2.3 Labiodentalization in Modern Contact Varieties ....................................22 2.4 Phonetics of Voiced Labial Consonants .................................................26 2.4.1 Articulatory Phonetics of Voiced Labial Consonants .................26 2.4.2 Acoustic Phonetics of Voiced Labial Consonants ......................27 2.4.3 Acoustic Measures ......................................................................29 2.5 Research Questions .................................................................................32 Chapter 3: Language Contact in El Paso ...............................................................34 3.1 Language Contact ...................................................................................34 3.2 Phonetic and Phonological Outcomes of Language Contact ..................40 3.3 The History of Spanish and English in Texas .........................................45 3.4 Spanish and Language Contact in Contemporary Texas ........................48 3.5 El Paso: Past and Present ........................................................................51 Chapter 4: Sociolinguistic Variables and Hypotheses ...........................................57 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................57 4.2 Research Questions and Hypotheses ......................................................58 4.3 Linguistic Variables ................................................................................62 4.3.1 Orthography ................................................................................62 v 4.3.2 Cognate Status ............................................................................64 4.3.3 Stress ...........................................................................................65 4.3.4 Adjacent Phonemes .....................................................................66 4.3.5 Within-Word Consonant Position ...............................................67 4.3.6 Lexical Frequency .......................................................................68 4.4 Social Variables ......................................................................................69 4.4.1 Age ..............................................................................................70 4.4.2 Gender .........................................................................................71 4.4.3 Education Level and Language ...................................................72 4.4.4 Language Proficiency .................................................................73 Chapter 5: Production Study ..................................................................................76 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................76 5.2 Auditory Analysis ...................................................................................76 5.2.1.1 Auditory Analysis: Participants ......................................76 5.2.1.2 Auditory Analysis: Tasks ................................................77 5.2.1.3 Auditory Analysis: Materials and Procedures ................81 5.2.1.4 Auditory Analysis: Statistical Models ............................84 5.2.2 Auditory Analysis: Results .........................................................85 5.2.3 Auditory Analysis: Discussion ...................................................89 5.3 Acoustic Analysis ...................................................................................91 5.3.1 Acoustic Analysis: Methods .......................................................92 5.3.1.1 Acoustic Analysis: Materials and Procedures.................92 5.3.1.2 Acoustic Analysis: Statistical Models ............................94 5.3.2 Acoustic Analysis: Results .........................................................94 5.3.3 Acoustic Analysis: Discussion ..................................................101 5.4 Study Conclusions ................................................................................103 Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusions ...............................................................106 6.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................106 6.2 Goals of the Research Revisited ...........................................................106 6.3 Summary of Results and Discussion.....................................................107 vi Appendices ...........................................................................................................121 Appendix A .................................................................................................121 Appendix B .................................................................................................127 Appendix C .................................................................................................133 References ............................................................................................................134 vii List of Tables Table 1: Texas Hispanic population and national origin (2014)............................50 Table 2: El Paso County Hispanic population and national origin (2014). ...........54 Table 3: Speakers by age and gender…………………………………………….77 Table 4: All the variables used and their levels, organized by type. .....................83 Table 5: Contingency table of labiodentalization occurrences. .............................86 Table 6: Regression................................................................................................87 Table 7: Acoustic variables…. ...............................................................................93 Table 8: Contingency table of the mean values of the acoustic measures.. ...........95 Table 9: Regression................................................................................................96
Recommended publications
  • Systemic Contrast and Catalan Rhotics*
    Systemic Contrast and Catalan Rhotics* Jaye Padgett - University of California, Santa Cruz (January 2003) 1. Introduction Catalan, a Romance language spoken primarily in the northeast of Spain, has two contrasting rhotics: a tap [r] and a trill [r]. The two sounds contrast only between vowels with the distribution otherwise being predictable. The facts closely parallel the better known facts of Spanish, and the problems they raise are similar. In this paper I take a new look at Catalan rhotics, arguing that we can achieve a better account of them if we explicitly acknowledge the role of contrast in their behavior. Specifically, the explanation calls on constraints requiring that contrast be maintained, on the one hand, and on constraints requiring that contrasts be perceptually distinct, on the other. The account is cast within Dispersion Theory (Flemming 1995, to appear), which is designed to express such notions. In approaching the Catalan facts in this way I follow Bradley (2001), who applies Dispersion Theory to Spanish rhotics. Some of the main conclusions we reach differ, all the same. A good deal of recent work argues that both neutralization avoidance and perceptual distinctiveness play important roles in shaping phonologies. (Besides the above, see Ní Chiosáin and Padgett 2001, Sanders 2002, Padgett to appear-a,b, and Sanders in progress.) The theoretical framework of these works, Dispersion Theory, remains rather new, and this paper offers another case study. The appeal to contrast leads to a simpler and more explanatory account of Catalan (and Spanish) rhotics compared to previous ones. The analysis also illustrates how it is possible to incorporate more systematic phonetic detail into phonology, increasing our descriptive coverage, without predicting the overgeneration of contrast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Peculiarities of the Vietnamese Alphabet André-Georges Haudricourt
    The origin of the peculiarities of the Vietnamese alphabet André-Georges Haudricourt To cite this version: André-Georges Haudricourt. The origin of the peculiarities of the Vietnamese alphabet. Mon-Khmer Studies, 2010, 39, pp.89-104. halshs-00918824v2 HAL Id: halshs-00918824 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00918824v2 Submitted on 17 Dec 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Published in Mon-Khmer Studies 39. 89–104 (2010). The origin of the peculiarities of the Vietnamese alphabet by André-Georges Haudricourt Translated by Alexis Michaud, LACITO-CNRS, France Originally published as: L’origine des particularités de l’alphabet vietnamien, Dân Việt Nam 3:61-68, 1949. Translator’s foreword André-Georges Haudricourt’s contribution to Southeast Asian studies is internationally acknowledged, witness the Haudricourt Festschrift (Suriya, Thomas and Suwilai 1985). However, many of Haudricourt’s works are not yet available to the English-reading public. A volume of the most important papers by André-Georges Haudricourt, translated by an international team of specialists, is currently in preparation. Its aim is to share with the English- speaking academic community Haudricourt’s seminal publications, many of which address issues in Southeast Asian languages, linguistics and social anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Status of Catalan Schwa in Barcelona
    ICPhS XVII Regular Session Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 ANALYZING THE STATUS OF CATALAN SCHWA IN BARCELONA Susana Cortés , Conxita Lleó & Ariadna Benet Research Centre on Multilingualism, University of Hamburg, Germany [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT underlying schwa phoneme (the latter author points out that this schwa has the following This paper analyzes the production of Catalan distinctive features: [medial central-labial]). schwa by children and adults in two areas of Another approach is that of van Oostendorp's Barcelona differing in degree of presence of Projection Theory [9], based on metrical Spanish (which does not have schwa in its sound phonology. According to him, schwa is a defective inventory). The schwa production in different vowel, with unspecified distinctive features, kinds of words or in different positions in the word suitably fitting in weak and in extrametrical provides evidence for the status of this vowel. positions. Keywords: schwa, production, bilingualism, These theories, together with certain Catalan, phonological status assumptions about sound change, make different predictions about the substitution or maintenance 1. INTRODUCTION of schwa: For the last forty years, it has been observed that a) If non-alternating schwas are maintained the usage of schwa in Catalan is decreasing (Lóp ez more often than alternating schwas, this would del Castillo [7], Veny [13], Payrató [10], Pla argue for the phonological character of non- Fulquet [11], Herrick [4]). This reduction of the alternating schwa. phonological system seems to be due to external b) Position in the word (Catalan stress system (e.g., Spanish influence) or internal factors (e.g., being basically trochaic): If schwa is kept in markedness and complexity).
    [Show full text]
  • A Reduction and Spreading Theory of Voicing and Other Sound Effects""
    CatWPL 412, 1995, 267-328 A Reduction and Spreading Theory of Voicing and Other Sound Effects"" Joan Mascaró Universitat Autbnoma de Barcelona. Departament de Filologia Catalana 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona). Catalonia (Spain) [email protected] Abstract A set of different surface effects commonly found in the phonology of natural lan- guages, voicing assimilation and final devoicing, are derived from two parameters, Reduction, the loss of phonological structure, and Spreading, the association of two unas- sociated nodes. Reduction is an operation on a node (e.g. voice), and it can take three values: no operation, Deassociation of the node, or Deletion of the node. Spreading has just the two minimal values, + and -. Spreading can combine with Reduction, or with Deassociation, resulting in two different assimilatory effects. When Spreading takes the negative value, or when contextually no spreading is possible, the surface effect that results is devoicing. The different parametric settings of Recluction and Spreading coupled with syllable control, and stages of application, predict the appropriate surfa- ce clusters of voicing effects. These results are extended to other effects like place centralization, unmarked assimilation, and to a set of residual or sporadic effects like progressive assimilation in regressive systems. Key words: phonological theory, voicing, assimilation, devoicing. Resum. Una teoria de reducció i d'escampament de la sonoritat i d'altres efectes sonors Tota una sbrie d'efectes superficials que es troben sovint en la fonologia de les llengües naturals, l'assimilació i l'ensordiment final, es deriven de dos parimetres: la Reducció, O NOTE OF THE EDITORS. Although CatWPL normally publishes the results of ongoing research, the editors have considered that this 1987 manuscript was worth publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • SSC: the Science of Talking
    SSC: The Science of Talking (for year 1 students of medicine) Week 3: Sounds of the World’s Languages (vowels and consonants) Michael Ashby, Senior Lecturer in Phonetics, UCL PLIN1101 Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology A Lecture 4 page 1 Vowel Description Essential reading: Ashby & Maidment, Chapter 5 4.1 Aim: To introduce the basics of vowel description and the main characteristics of the vowels of RP English. 4.2 Definition of vowel: Vowels are produced without any major obstruction of the airflow; the intra-oral pressure stays low, and vowels are therefore sonorant sounds. Vowels are normally voiced. Vowels are articulated by raising some part of the tongue body (that is the front or the back of the tongue notnot the tip or blade) towards the roof of the oral cavity (see Figure 1). 4.3 Front vowels are produced by raising the front of the tongue towards the hard palate. Back vowels are produced by raising the back of the tongue towards the soft palate. Central vowels are produced by raising the centre part of the tongue towards the junction of the hard and soft palates. 4.4 The height of a vowel refers to the degree of raising of the relevant part of the tongue. If the tongue is raised so as to be close to the roof of the oral cavity then a close or high vowel is produced. If the tongue is only slightly raised, so that there is a wide gap between its highest point and the roof of the oral cavity, then an open or lowlowlow vowel results.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocale Incerta, Vocale Aperta*
    Vocale Incerta, Vocale Aperta* Michael Kenstowicz Massachusetts Institute of Technology Omaggio a P-M. Bertinetto Ogni toscano si comporta di fronte a una parola a lui nuova, come si nota p. es. nella lettura del latino, scegliendo costantamente, e inconsciamente, il timbro aperto, secondo il principio che il Migliorini ha condensato nella formula «vocale incerta, vocale aperta»…è il processo a cui vien sottoposto ogni vocabolo importato o adattato da altri linguaggi. (Franceschi 1965:1-3) 1. Introduction Standard Italian distinguishes seven vowels in stressed nonfinal syllables. The open ɛ,ɔ vs. closed e,o mid-vowel contrast (transcribed here as open è,ò vs. closed é,ó) is neutralized in unstressed position (1). (1) 3 sg. infinitive tócca toccàre ‘touch’ blòcca bloccàre ‘block’ péla pelàre ‘pluck’ * A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the MIT Phonology Circle and the 40th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, University of Washington (March 2010). Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments as well as to Maria Giavazzi, Giovanna Marotta, Joan Mascaró, Andrea Moro, and Mario Saltarelli. 1 gèla gelàre ‘freeze’ The literature uniformly identifies the unstressed vowels as closed. Consequently, the open è and ò have more restricted distribution and hence by traditional criteria would be identified as "marked" (Krämer 2009). In this paper we examine various lines of evidence indicating that the open vowels are optimal in stressed (open) syllables (the rafforzamento of Nespor 1993) and thus that the closed é and ó are "marked" in this position: {è,ò} > {é,ó} (where > means “better than” in the Optimality Theoretic sense).
    [Show full text]
  • Phonemic Instability: a Butterfly Effect
    PHONEMIC INSTABILITY: A BUTTERFLY EFFECT PAROMA SANYAL REENA ASHEM Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi, India 1xxIntroduction Can an imperceptibly tiny change in the relative ranking of a markedness constraint lead to phonemic instability and ultimately sound change in a language? In this paper we predict that this could indeed be the case when the phonological processes that take place within a certain morpho-phonological domain result in a particular phoneme being reinterpreted as marked by new learners of the language. According to McCarthy and Prince (1994), The Emergence of the Unmarked is a generalization about markedness constraints that are otherwise invisible in a language becoming visible in certain marked domains. While a markedness constraint C 'in the language as a whole, may be roundly violated, but in a particular domain it is obeyed exactly.' Now imagine the scenario where a markedness constraint C is ranked so low in the language that it is invisible for all practical purposes. However, when the satisfaction of a complex set of well-formedness constraints within a marked domain coincides with a systematic violation of C, it is possible for new learners of the language to re-rank C higher in the language. Thus the surface realization of phonological well-formedness conditions, if coincidentally localized to particular phonemes, rather than being distributed over a range of environments, could trigger phonemic instability and eventual sound change in the language. The Tibeto-Burman language Meiteilon, spoken in the state of Manipur in India, we claim, has a similar reanalysis taking place in its current phonological grammar. Meiteilon, like most other Tibeto-Burman languages of the region has rich inflectional morphology that attaches as suffixes to monosyllabic nominal or verbal roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominance in Coronal Nasal Place Assimilation: the Case of Classical Arabic
    http://elr.sciedupress.com English Linguistics Research Vol. 9, No. 3; 2020 Dominance in Coronal Nasal Place Assimilation: The Case of Classical Arabic Zainab Sa’aida Correspondence: Zainab Sa’aida, Department of English, Tafila Technical University, Tafila 66110, Jordan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-6957, E-mail: [email protected] Received: August 16, 2020 Accepted: Sep. 15, 2020 Online Published: Sep. 21, 2020 doi:10.5430/elr.v9n3p25 URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v9n3p25 Abstract The aim of this study is to investigate place assimilation processes of coronal nasal in classical Arabic. I hypothesise that coronal nasal behaves differently in different assimilatory situations in classical Arabic. Data of the study were collected from the Holy Quran. It was referred to Quran.com for the pronunciations and translations of the data. Data of the study were analysed from the perspective of Mohanan’s dominance in assimilation model. Findings of the study have revealed that coronal nasal shows different assimilatory behaviours when it occurs in different syllable positions. Coronal nasal onset seems to fail to assimilate a whole or a portion of the matrix of a preceding obstruent or sonorant coda within a phonological word. However, coronal nasal in the coda position shows different phonological behaviours. Keywords: assimilation, dominance, coronal nasal, onset, coda, classical Arabic 1. Introduction An assimilatory situation in natural languages has two elements in which one element dominates the other. Nasal place assimilation occurs when a nasal phoneme takes on place features of an adjacent consonant. This study aims at investigating place assimilation processes of coronal nasal in classical Arabic (CA, henceforth).
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Phonology
    3 More on Phonemes 3.1 Phonemic Analysis and Writing The question of phonemicization is in principle independent from the question of writing; that is, there is no necessary connection between letters and phonemes. For example, the English phoneme /e}/ can be spelled in quite a few ways: say /se}/, Abe /e}b/, main /me}n/, beige /be}è/, reggae /cryge}/, H /e}tà/. Indeed, there are languages (for example, Mandarin Chinese) that are written with symbols that do not correspond to phonemes at all. Obviously, there is at least a loose connection between alphabetic letters and phonemes: the designers of an alphabet tend to match up the written symbols with the phonemes of a language. Moreover, the conscious intuitions of speakers about sounds tend to be heavily influenced by their knowledge of spelling – after all, most literate speakers receive extensive training in how to spell during child- hood, but no training at all in phonology. Writing is prestigious, and our spoken pronunciations are sometimes felt to be imperfect realizations of what is written. This is reflected in the common occur- rence of spelling pronunciations, which are pronunciations that have no historical basis, but which arise as attempts to mimic the spelling, as in often [cÑftvn] or palm [pwlm]. In contrast, most linguists feel that spoken language is primary, and that written language is a derived system, which is mostly parasitic off the spoken language and is often rather artificial in character. Some reasons that support this view are that spoken language is far older than writing, it is acquired first and with greater ease by children, and it is the common property of our species, rather than of just an educated subset of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial 5.5 Accesstruth
    MODULE 5 - COMMUNICATION FOUNDATIONS ACCESSTRUTH TUTORIAL Phonetics 3 5.5 This tutorial continues to look at the manner of articulation of various speech sounds. Introduction In the last tutorial we started to look at manner of articulation - the type and degree of obstruction of the airflow when consonants are made. We have already looked at the oral stops and the nasal stops. In this tutorial we will look at the manner of articulation of some more types of consonants. Fricatives With all the sounds that we’ve discussed so far (the stops) there’s a brief complete obstruction of the airflow. If we bring one articulator very close to another, the airflow can pass between the two articulators but has to go through a very narrow passage, creating a kind of noise. The sounds made in this way are fricatives. Usually with fricatives the velum is raised, so that air can’t escape out of the nose, though it’s continuously passing through the narrow passage out of the mouth. English doesn’t have bilabial fricatives, though some languages, including Spanish, do. English has labiodental fricatives, where the lower lip comes close to or touches the upper front teeth; the voiceless and voiced labiodental fricatives are the initial sounds in fine and vine, the symbols for them being [f] and [v] respectively. There are two sounds in English written as <th> - as in thing and this. These are voiceless and voiced dental fricatives respectively. The IPA symbols for these are [θ] and [ð]. 1 MODULE 5 - COMMUNICATION FOUNDATIONS ACCESSTRUTH English also has voiced and voiceless alveolar fricatives, as in the words sue and zoo - here we bring the tip or blade of the tongue very close to the alveolar ridge - and the symbols for them are [s] and [z].
    [Show full text]
  • A Perceptual Correlate of the Labial-Coronal Effect Marc Sato, Nathalie Vallée, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Isabelle Rousset
    A perceptual correlate of the labial-coronal effect Marc Sato, Nathalie Vallée, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Isabelle Rousset To cite this version: Marc Sato, Nathalie Vallée, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Isabelle Rousset. A perceptual correlate of the labial- coronal effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, American Speech-Language- Hearing Association, 2007, 50 (6), pp.1466-1480. 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/101). hal-00194046 HAL Id: hal-00194046 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00194046 Submitted on 5 Dec 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Author manuscript, published in "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 6 (2007) 1466-1480" DOI : 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/101) A Perceptual correlate of the Labial-Coronal Effect 1 A perceptual correlate of the Labial-Coronal Effect Marc Sato 1,2, Nathalie Vallée 1,*, Jean-Luc Schwartz 1, Isabelle Rousset 1 1 Institut de la Communication Parlée, CNRS UMR 5009, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, Université Stendhal 2 Departimento di Neuroscienze, Sezione di Fisiologia, Universita
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Degrees of Labiality
    Phonological degrees of labiality February 5, 2018 Abstract A [+round] or [labial] feature is traditionally viewed as an elementary phonological unit that has different phonetic realizations depending on the height and backness of the segment that realizes it (Clements and Hume 1995, McCarthy 1988, Halle 1995, Kaun 1997 among oth- ers). In this paper, I make two claims: a) qualitatively different lip-gestures are phonological in some languages, and b) there is more faithfulness to more extreme lip gestures. 1 Introduction While it has long been known that rounding is not realized uniformly across vowel heights, this fact has been considered purely phonetic. This paper proposes an analysis of a phonological phenomenon involving a transfer of labiality from a vowel to a consonant under certain conditions. I argue that the Karata data support the idea that differences in rounding can be phonological1. Karata (kir¯Ïi maţ¯’i, Russian karatinskij jazyk)2 is an understudied Nakh-Daghestanian lan- guage originally spoken in 10 ‘auls’ (i.e. mountain-top villages) in western Daghestan.3 The available literature on Karata consists of a grammatical sketch [Magomedbekova, 1971] , and a dictionary (Karata to Russian) [Magomedova and Khalidova, 2001]. The data presented in this paper come from fieldwork that I carried out in June 2011 and July 2012 and from the above mentioned sources. The structure of the paper is the following. Section 2 gives an overview of the phenomenon investigated and its proposed analysis. Section 3 provides background information on the phonol- ogy of Karata. Section 4 is dedicated to the OT analysis of the Karata.
    [Show full text]