Chapter 4 Facts and Findings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 4 Facts and Findings CHAPTER 4 FACTS AND FINDINGS This chapter is based on the findings of the researcher during the course of the research. This chapter has been divided into three broad parts- the first part will deal with the facts about ASEAN; the second part will deal with the relationship between Thailand and ASEAN. The third and the final part will address the ‘Results to be obtained’ which the researcher has aimed at achieving at the beginning of this research. Part 1 1.1. ASEAN Association of the Southeast Asian Nations in short ASEAN, which was founded on 8th August 1967, was the first successful attempt at a regional integration in the bigger Asian context- a joint effort by the five founding members, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand at a joint effort to promote co-operation and welfare of the people. According to Thanat Khoman, the then Foreign Minister of Thailand, who is one of the Founding Fathers of ASEAN: “After repeated unsuccessful attempts in the past, this event was a unique achievement, ending the separation and aloofness of the countries of this region that had resulted from colonial times when they were forced by the colonial masters to live in cloisons etanches, shunning contact with the neighbouring countries. In effect this historical event represents the culmination of the decolonization process that had started after World War II” (Khoman, Thanat 1992, p. xviii) 4.1.1. Facts: ASEAN The researcher has gathered the following facts about ASEAN during the course of this research: 1. ASEAN is an important sub-grouping located within the dynamic region of Southeast Asia, characterized by powerful investment and innovatory capacities of the individual nations. While ASEAN may not provide an essentially economic 1 framework at the beginning but its political function and cooperation have formed the paradigms behind its formation. 2. Unlike European Union “where the impetus for integration was generated by the wish to overcome lasting contention amongst the founding members’, the underlying motivation for the creation of ASEAN was driven by external factors, of a political and security nature” (Angresano, James 2006, p.114). Thus, we can say that ASEAN members came together due to political reasons, and were held together due to political fear rather than by a desire to benefit from economic integration. According to Thanat Khoman, “The fact that the Western powers, France and Britain, reneged on their pacts with Poland and Czechoslovakia promising protection against external aggression was instrumental in drawing the attention of many countries to the credibility of assurance advanced by large powers to smaller partners. The lesson drawn from such events encouraged weak nations to rely more on neighbourly mutual support than on stronger states that serve their own national interests rather than those of the smaller partners” (Khoman, Thanat 1992) Therefore these smaller nations of Southeast Asia decided to join in hand to protect themselves from external factors like, the growing fear of a possible aggression by Vietnam, the growing trend of communism from China etc. 3. From the time of its inception, the leaders insisted that economic and political matters should be kept separate. And consequently, the economic interest of the ASEAN members basically remained national. In fact, ASEAN was not established to pursue supranational objectives. At the very first ASEAN Summit in Bali, in 1976, the members signed the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC) - a non-aggression pact aimed at promoting regional stability. The underlying motive behind this is the determination of the founding states to prevent disputes of any kind erupting among them and in any case if such situation arises, to settle any such disputes by peaceful means. In 1993, the ASEAN Regional Forum was established in order to foster dialogue and consultation on political and security issues while building confidence and preventing diplomacy of any kind in Southeast Asia. And finally in 1995, the integration of the founding five members has been expanded to become 10 including Vietnam. 4. An important fact about ASEAN is that, it is not a military alliance. Having no common enemies actual or potential. “ASEAN is not a military alliance or defence pact, although the individual members are free to enter into military arrangements with other countries provided that they don’t threaten the security of the neighbours” (Know Your ASEAN 2007, p. 17). On this issue, S. Rajaratnam, the Foreign Minister of Singapore at the time of inception of ASEAN said that- “We are not against anything or not against anybody. We want to ensure a stable Southeast Asia and not a balkanized Southeast Asia”. 5. The policy of non-interference in the member country’s internal affairs is another important aspect of ASEAN. In fact from its inception ASEAN as an administrative body has been kept quite separately from the internal political affairs of its member nations. “ASEAN’s institutions have been consciously kept diffuse, decentralised, and 2 under national control” (Palmer and Reckford 1987, p. 109). It was actually the decision of the Founding Fathers of ASEAN not to go for any institutional framework which can give the potential superpowers a major voice in their national affairs. According to James Angresano- the lack of interest in building supranational institutions is also due to the fear that such institutions, in creating a higher level of governance, provide prime vehicles for corruption and the abuse of power. 6. ASEAN’s structure is often being described as a pure intergovernmental organization without any bureaucratic decision making body. This was in accordance with the member nations’ preference to a gradual and pragmatic change and their emphasis placed on maintaining their national sovereignty. “Each ASEAN member states has learned to respect each other’s political system and domestic affairs and appreciate the fact that no single state has the right to impose its will on fellow members” (Gramenga 1997). Thus, the decisions made on the ASEAN platform are based on consensus or unanimity and not by taking a vote. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that every decision has to be categorically and explicitly supported by every one of the member states. The basic philosophy of ASEAN decision making system is that no member opposes the decision making strongly enough so as to register its objection. As a matter of fact in certain cases, some of the ASEAN agreements have been formalized without the ratification of all the signatories. For instance, The Southeast Asian Nuclear Weapon Free Zone treaty required only seven ratifications to enter into force. 7. Owing to its policy of non-interference and the renounce of the use of threat as a mode of managing relation between states, ASEAN has been particularly successful in promoting peace and stability in the Southeast Asian region. It has opposed invasion and occupation as a way of bringing about a change in the neighbouring countries. ASEAN took a leading role in bringing about a political settlement of the Cambodian conflict of 1979-91. According to Thanat Khoman- the effective and successful opposition to the implementation of Vietnam’s Grand Desire, using only diplomatic and political means, won a great deal of plaudits and international credit, lifting it from an insignificant grouping of small countries to a much courted organization with much more important states now seek to have contact and dialogue. Today, ASEAN has engaged the leading powers of the region to manage the affairs of the region in a balanced and constructive way by means of different platforms like, the system of Dialogue Partnership, the ASEAN Regional Forum, the East Asian Summit etc. 8. The history of ASEAN shows hat for the first decade of its existence, ASEAN didn’t paid much focus on the economic aspect of the integration and people believe that the “token economic cooperation that did exists was only a cover for ASEAN’s anti- communist political intentions” (Angresano, James 2006, p. 115). However it was the Oil crisis of 1973 that stimulated the member states to think on the economic lines and it was only during the 1980s, that trade preferences and coordinated industrial policies gained impetus. 9. During the first two decade of its existence, the economic integration efforts were basically modest and fairly ineffective. The reasons behind this are: 3 a) The ASEAN member states continued having their own national policies regarding trade, agricultural production, state-owned enterprises, foreign investment and joint ventures. b) Another reason is, until very recently the ASEAN nations “still view themselves as distinct and competitive” (Letiche 2000, p. 285). It was because, the economies of these member countries though are complementary, but until the past few years they have been producing inter-industry goods, such as rubber, oil and other natural resources in an environment that is complementary in the sense of inter-industry. c) The third reason being, these member nations are all relatively small economies and their inclination is more towards the richer trading partners outside the region like Japan, USA and EU. 10. An important fact about ASEAN in these early years of its existence is that, little credit is given to the association for the dramatic improvement in terms of the standard economic indicators of its original member countries. In fact some analysts say that the economic importance of the association [ASEAN] however, could be said to derive more from rapid growth and development performance of some of its member economies, rather than the collective strength and cohesion idem)of the association itself (Angresano, James 2006). Statistics says that the intra-ASEAN trade grew from 3.2 per cent in 1980 to 4 percent in 1990. 11. However, the ASEAN influence in bringing about regional peace and security in the region to facilitate the growth and success of the individual economies can’t be denied.
Recommended publications
  • President Richard Nixon's Daily Diary, July 16-31, 1969
    RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest 7/30/1969 A 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest from Don- 7/30/1969 A Maung Airport, Bangkok 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/23/1969 A Appendix “B” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/24/1969 A Appendix “A” 5 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/26/1969 A Appendix “B” 6 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/27/1969 A Appendix “A” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-3 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary July 16, 1969 – July 31, 1969 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) rnc.~IIJc.I'" rtIl."I'\ttU 1"'AUI'4'~ UAILJ UIAtU (See Travel Record for Travel Activity) ---- -~-------------------~--------------I PLACi-· DAY BEGA;'{ DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) JULY 16, 1969 TIME DAY THE WHITE HOUSE - Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Agnew Assails U.S. Critics of Ewitary Aid to Thailand Va,T
    Agnew Assails U.S. Critics Of e WitaryvA,t Aid to Thailand By Jack Foisie Loa Amities TIrries BANGKOK, Jan. 4—The Thal government, which has always decried American criti- cism of some aspects of Thai- American military coopera- tion, gained a new supporter today in Vice President Spiro Agnew. Meeting with Prime Minis- ter Thanom Kittikachorn for two hours today, Agnew de- clared: "Some people back home are so anxious to make friends of our enemies that they even seem ready to make enemies of our friends," The quote was approved for attribution to the Vice Presi- dent by American officials who sat in on the closed ses- sion- It was the second time on his Asian trip, now in its sec- ond week, that Agnew had re- newed his criticism of televi- sion and newspaper reporting, and of the people who do not wholly support American in- volvement in the Vietnam war. His comment could also apply to Sens. J. W. Fulbright (D-Ark.), Stuart Symington ID-Mo.) and Albert Gore (D- Tenn.), who have questioned the extent of US. commit- ments to Thailand. 0 t h e r Senators have opposed use of U.S. troops alland or Laos mout congressional approval. Both American and Thai ac- counts of the Thanom-Agnew talks said that most doubts had been dispelled about the Associated Prens "Nixon doctrine" of gradual The Agnews tour grounds of the Bangkok Grand Palace de-escalation of American po- litical and military presence• American policy, and no less- in Asia. They said Agnew declared the ening of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Almost nobody disputes that the end of the Cold War had a profound impact on the whole pattern of international security but, more than a decade after the transition, the character of the post-Cold War se- curity order still remains hotly contested. This book explores the idea that, since decolonisation, the regional level of security has become both more autonomous and more prominent in international politics, and that the ending of the Cold War accelerated this process (Katzenstein 2000). This idea follows naturally from the ending of bipolarity. Without su- perpower rivalry intruding obsessively into all regions, local powers have more room for manoeuvre. For a decade after the ending of the Cold War, both the remaining superpower and the other great powers (China, EU, Japan, Russia) had less incentive, and displayed less will, to intervene in security affairs outside their own regions. The terrorist attack on the United States in 2001 may well trigger some reassertion of great power interventionism, but this is likely to be for quite narrow and specific purposes, and seems unlikely to recreate the general willingness to intervene abroad that was a feature of Cold War superpower rivalry. The relative autonomy of regional security constitutes a pattern of in- ternational security relations radically different from the rigid structure of superpower bipolarity that defined the Cold War. In our view, this pattern is not captured adequately by either ‘unipolar’ or ‘multipolar’ designations of the international system structure. Nor is it captured by the idea of ‘globalisation’ or by the dismal conclusion that the best that IR can do in conceptualising the security order of the post-Cold War world is to call it ‘the new world disorder’ (Carpenter 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Security Relations with China Since 1989
    Japan’s Security Relations with China since 1989 The Japanese–Chinese security relationship is one of the most important vari- ables in the formation of a new strategic environment in the Asia-Pacific region which has not only regional but also global implications. The book investigates how and why since the 1990s China has turned in the Japanese perception from a benign neighbour to an ominous challenge, with implications not only for Japan’s security, but also its economy, role in Asia and identity as the first devel- oped Asian nation. Japan’s reaction to this challenge has been a policy of engagement, which consists of political and economic enmeshment of China, hedged by political and military power balancing. The unique approach of this book is the use of an extended security concept to analyse this policy, which allows a better and more systematic understanding of its many inherent contradictions and conflicting dynamics, including the centrifugal forces arising from the Japan–China–US triangular relationship. Many contradictions of Japan’s engagement policy arise from the overlap of military and political power-balancing tools which are part of containment as well as of engagement, a reality which is downplayed by Japan but not ignored by China. The complex nature of engagement explains the recent reinforcement of Japan’s security cooperation with the US and Tokyo’s efforts to increase the security dialogues with countries neighbouring China, such as Vietnam, Myanmar and the five Central Asian countries. The book raises the crucial question of whether Japan’s political leadership, which is still preoccupied with finding a new political constellation and with overcoming a deep economic crisis, is able to handle such a complex policy in the face of an increasingly assertive China and a US alliance partner with strong swings between engaging and containing China’s power.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINA: the Awakening of Th Red Dragon
    Framework Document 03/2016 March 4, 20166 Alfonso Zurita Borbón* CHINA: THE AWAKENING OF THE Visit WEB Receive Newsletter RED DRAGON CHINA: THE AWAKENING OF THE RED DRAGON Abstract: During the first decades of the century, China has positioned itself as the number one economic power in terms of GDP measured by purchasing power parity. China's economic model and its unique and individual qualities caused the meteoric economic rise of the country. President Xi Jinping is transforming the country through a comprehensive reform program. China's commitment to long- term structural change and it’s the main economic objective of moving its economy from one led by investment and exports to one driven by consumption. Many experts and analysts predict that during the current century, China will alter the balance of world order and create a new world order. Keywords: XXI century, China, Chinese economic model, world number one economic, five-year plan for national economic and social development, renminbi, global economic balance, new world order international economic system. *NOTA: Las ideas contenidas en los Documentos Marco son de responsabilidad de sus autores, sin que reflejen, necesariamente, el pensamiento del IEEE o del Ministerio de Defensa. Documento Marco 03/2016 1 CHINA: THE AWAKENING OF THE RED DRAGON Alfonso Zurita Borbón INTRODUCTION China´s Brief Historical Past Both the theory and the mentality of international relations in general are experiencing a transition from the old hardcore Classical and Structural political Realism to Pluralism. In the practice of international relations, those changes can be seen reflected in the systemic (international system) re-structuring that is taking place, due to the progressive transformation of the rigid bipolar world order dynamised and governed by Realism, to a new international multipolar Pluralist and interdependent system.
    [Show full text]
  • Preview from Notesale.Co.Uk Page 1 of 34
    Geography Unit 3 Notes Energy Security Energy supply, demand and security Types of energy source • 85% of global energy consumption in 2007 was from fossil fuels. • Dependence on fossil fuels has only emerged over the past few hundred years. Pre – industrial revolution most energy sources were renewable. • Environmental consequences of using renewable, non-renewable and recyclable energy; o Renewable sources produce no carbon dioxide and do not directly contribute to atmospheric pollution. o Non-renewable sources emit carbon dioxide during combustion and are the cause of global warming. o Recyclable biomass and biofuels emit carbon dioxide but reabsorb it when they are regrown – making them potentially close to being ‘carbon neutral’. • Nuclear power stations do not emit carbon dioxide but there are significant environmental concerns about the radioactive uranium fuel, and the long-term problem of disposing of nuclear waste. Distribution Preview from Notesale.co.uk • Direct access to energy resources is determined primarily by the physical geography of an area. Page 1 of 34 • For example, with tidal ranges of up to 15 metres, some of Europe’s strongest winds and many glacial valleys, the UK has significant renewable resource potential. • Conversely, high latitude areas such as the UK have low solar power potential. • Areas that are tectonically active such as Iceland have much higher geothermal potential. • Similar energy resources are concentrated geographically; o In 2005, 4 countries made up over 70% of global uranium production for nuclear power – led by Canada (28%) and Australia (23%). o By 2025, 60% of the world’s oil supply will come from the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Foreign Policy from a Constructivist Viewpoint
    ௐ 4 ഇ! ࢱ 93-122! 2018 ѐ/΋؞ཱི !ס έ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώ! ௐ 14 Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 93-122 Winter 2018 馬來西亞的外交政策 ─ 建構主義觀點 ࡰ஽ܲ ૩̋ࡊԫ̂ጯ̳ВᙯܼၱᇃӘրઘି଱ ၡ ࢋ гٺၹ͹ཌྷ۞៍ᕇྋᛖ੺ֽҘֲ۞γϹ߆ඉĄϤޙώኢ͛ဘྏϡ நҜཉᄃˠ˾ඕၹ۞ᙯܼĂ1970 ѐ΃ͽ݈੺ֽҘֲ۞γϹ߆ඉೀͼ׶ ੺઼ᔵ൒֕Ш̚ϲ̙ඕޢщБͽ઼̈́छщБ࠹ᙯĄ1970 ѐ΃ͽొ̰ ߏޢĄ1980 ѐ΃ͽޘࠧͽವՐՀ̂۞઼ᅫਕ֍͵ڒ᎗೻ٺ༖Ăҭ߿᜙ Ш߆ඉͽ̈́ 2020 ѐण୕Ăૄώ˯ߏͽགྷᑻ൴णࠎڌ੺ݣ࢚ٙᑞထ۞ ͹ጱ۞γϹ߆ඉĄ఺ቔኢ͛Ϻ఍ந˞੺ֽҘֲ۞кᙝᙯܼͽ̈́੺઼д ݑ઼̚ঔ۞ϲٺݑ઼̚ঔ۞ϲಞĂ֭ͷͽ α჌ଐဩֽྋᛖ੺઼̝ ၹ͹ཌྷ۞ఢቑăᄮТă̼͛ă࠹̢͹៍ăۤົޙಞĄ͛ϐĂඊ۰ᄮࠎ ன၁͹ཌྷᄃҋϤ͹ཌྷĂՀਕྋᛖ੺઼۞γϹ߆ඉٺĂ࠹ྵه၁ኹඈ៍ ྮशĄ ၹ͹ཌྷޙăݑ઼̚ঔăםڌᙯᔣෟĈ Ͽ೻ᜋ઼छă ăௐ 4 ഇĞ2018/΋؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 14 94 壹、前言 γϹ߆ٺ၆͞ءΪߏԯ੺ֽҘֲڍдኢࢗ੺ֽҘֲ۞γϹ߆ඉॡĂт γϹ͹ૺ̝Ķ੺ֽҘֲķ઼Щரعઇ˘ୃࢗĂּт૟ͽ˭੺઼߆ڱඉ۞࠻ ኜαঔ࠰໤Ă֭൑Їңࣃ଀ኢ̝ࢗ఍ĞMinistryٸΝĂ׎၁Ă఺˘इγϹ߆ඉ of Foreign Affairs, 2018ğĄ 【馬來西亞】奉行以和平、人道、正義及平等價值觀為基礎的獨 立原則和務實的外交政策,其外交政策首要目標是保護【馬來西 亞】的主權和國家利益,並透過有效的外交行為為公平與平等的 國際社會做出有意義的貢獻。……【馬來西亞】推動前瞻性和務 實性的外交政策,促進貿易,吸引外國投資,以及作為穩定與和 平的國家。……【馬來西亞】充分致力於推動全球和平安全與繁 榮的多邊主義,在與發展國家的技術合作方面,【馬來西亞】通過 各種外交政策機制,分享經驗與知識並與其他國家進行合作。…… 【馬來西亞】繼續遵循獨立、主權、領土完整和不干涉他國事務 的原則,和平解決爭端,和平共處,互惠互利。 ݑֲ۞ڌ׎дצ˯ޘ඀̂ޝᇹᙜ΄γĂ੺઼۞γϹ߆ඉдءੵ˞఺ֱ পঅгநҜཉͽ̈́׎፾প۞ˠ˾ඕၹඈᙯᔣЯ৵۞ᇆᜩĂд̙Тॡഇѣ̙ Т͹ૺĄࠖѩĂώኢ͛дኢࢗ੺ֽҘֲγϹ߆ඉॡĂ͹ࢋ̶ࠎ׌̂ొ̶Ă ௐ˘ొ̶Аಶ׎পঅ۞гநҜཉ̈́׎၆щБ۞நྋүࡦഀ̬௜Ăͽѩాඕ γϹ߆ඉүࠎĂ֭ኢࢗЯপঅ۞ˠ˾ඕၹĂ۞عЧ࣎߆ޢ੺ֽҘֲ፾ϲז छ̚Էႊ઼̦ڒϔ͹઼छĂ੺ֽҘֲд᎗೻۞ٸࠧ̚࠹༊ฟ͵ڒүࠎ᎗೻ ֎ҒĂপҾߏݑঔજ۞̚ڼᆃ֎Ғĉௐ˟ొ̶݋ߏଣ੅੺ֽҘֲдડા߆ ၹ͹ཌྷޙᒜԊ๕̚੺઼۞γϹ͹ૺĄ͛ϐĂඊ۰ဘྏͽ઼ᅫᙯܼநኢ̚۞ ྋᛖ੺઼γϹ߆ඉĂ֭ரࢗέ៉д੺઼۞γϹߛၹ˭ѣң߉˧ᕇүࠎඕᄬĄ 貳、獨立後各政府的外交政策主張 ĆٛતĞTunku Abdul RahmanĂౌܠĆؑڌ੺ֽҘֲгநҜཉ۞ࢦࢋّĂϡ ੺ֽҘֲௐ˘Їࢵ࠹Ă1957-70ğ۞ྖֽᄲĂι۞઼˿˘ొ̶г఍ֲ߷̂ౙĂ ၹ͹ཌྷ៍ᕇ 95ޙ ੺ֽҘֲ۞γϹ߆ඉǕ ඍᘷᇃ̂Ηफ̚۞˘ొ̶Ą˵Яܝᛂזᄼăາೀֲ̰ޠଂහٺΩ˘ొ̶ᛳ זѩĂ੺ֽҘֲ่่̙ߏֲ߷̂ౙᄃֲ߷फᑎ̝ม۞፜ሇĂՀߏݑ઼̚ঔ ĞTunku Abdul Rahman, 1965: 659ğĄଂ፾ϲҌ̫੺͗ܝ߶̝ม۞υགྷޘО ҘֲВ።གྷ 7 Ҝࢵ࠹1ĂЯࠎгநҜཉ۞ࢦࢋّĂтңӀϡγϹ߆ඉдЕֽ ˠޘૻᚮు۞ᒖဩ̚ჯ޺Ϡхĉ˫Яࠎˠ˾۞পঅّĂ੺ֽˠăරˠăО ˭ߊхᆊࣃЧளĂ੺઼тңдк჌୉۞Ϡၗ˭ჯ޺઼छхд۞ᆊࣃĉͽ۞
    [Show full text]
  • Small Guide to Intercultural Interaction”, Addresses the Need for a Guide Containing Guidelines and Tips for Portuguese People Who Are Relocating in Russia
    INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE CONTABILIDADE E ADMINISTRAÇÃO DO PORTO POLITÉCNICO DO PORTO MESTRADO M ÁREA DE ESPECIALIZAÇÃO Working and Living in Russia: Small Guide to Intercultural Interaction César José de Sousa Reis 2019/2020 César Reis. Working and Living in Russia: Small Guide to Intercultural Living Russia: Interaction in Guide to Small Intercultural César WorkingReis. and 2019/2020 i INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE CONTABILIDADE E ADMINISTRAÇÃO DO PORTO POLITÉCNICO DO PORTO MESTRADO M ÁREA DE ESPECIALIZAÇÃO Working and Living in Russia: Small Guide to Intercultural Interaction César José de Sousa Reis Dissertação de Mestrado apresentado ao Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do grau de Mestre em Estudos Interculturais para Negócios, sob orientação de Doutora Maria Helena Guimarães Ustimenko César Reis. Working and Living in Russia: Small Guide to Intercultural Living Russia: Interaction in Guide to Small Intercultural César WorkingReis. and 2019/2020 ii Acknowledgements To my family and friends who supported me throughout this journey. To J.G. for his meaningul guidance. To K.G. for her support and constructive suggestions. To my supervisor, Maria Helena Guimarães Ustimenko, for her valuable recommendations and supervision during the planning and development of this reasearch work. To the opportunities to grow personally and professionally that ISCAP provided. iii Abstract: To address business global demands, multinationals are expanding abroad and so the expatriation process increases. Most of the times, workers are transferred to an international office to fulfil an overseas assignment and the company takes care of the whole relocation process. In addition, intercultural training is readied by the company so that the expatriate becomes culturally sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL CHALLENGES: a Sneak Peek Into the Future
    ACADEMIA DIPLOMATICA EUROPAEA INSTITUT EUROPÉEN DES RELATIONS INTERNATIONALES WORKING PAPER 15-2014 GLOBAL CHALLENGES: a sneak peek into the future Major General Giorgio SPAGNOL Member of IERI Member of International Institute of Humanitarian Law (IIHL) Former European Union Director of Operations (EUDO) Former Force Readiness Director (NATO) Bruxelles 09-09-2014 © Institut Européen des Relations Internationales Bruxelles, 11 Juin 2014 Institut Européen des Relations Internationales 27/A, Boulevard Charlemagne 1000 – Bruxelles (Belgique) Tel. : +32.2.280.14.95 – Site Web : www.ieri.be Citation : Giorgio SPAGNOL, Global challenges: a sneak peek into the future? N°21-2014 IERI Working Papers, Bruxelles, 2014 1 GLOBAL CHALLENGES: a sneak peek into the future Has the world a bright future to look forward to? Looking ahead can resemble writing science fiction but a balanced realism can help a lot in such attempt. There is, in fact, a recognition on the part of governments, international organizations, and the private sector of the need to develop a capacity for foresight in order to identify major global trends, assess their potential impact and fashion policy-making accordingly. Forecasting is often viewed as a statistical issue whose accuracy can be improved with probability training, team collaboration, and tracking. But this is not a scientific endeavour, it is educated guess. Although the future is unknowable and full of surprises, thinking about the future major geostrategic events and their implications (even with a flawed prediction) can help to concentrate on areas where results can be achieved. FOREWORD Following the fall of the Berlin Wall, the world has become unreliable, unpredictable and dangerous owing to regional crises caused by ethnic, social and religious factors in combination with lack of tolerance and continuous resort to confrontation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Process of ASEAN's Institutional Consolidation in 1968-1976
    The RSIS Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed are entirely the author’s own and not that of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. If you have any comments, please send them to the following email address: [email protected]. Unsubscribing If you no longer want to receive RSIS Working Papers, please click on “Unsubscribe.” to be removed from the list. No. 234 The Process of ASEAN’s Institutional Consolidation in 1968-1976: Theoretical Implications for Changes of Third-World Security Oriented Institution Kei Koga S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore 24 February 2012 About RSIS The S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) was established in January 2007 as an autonomous School within the Nanyang Technological University. Known earlier as the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies when it was established in July 1996, RSIS’ mission is to be a leading research and graduate teaching institution in strategic and international affairs in the Asia Pacific. To accomplish this mission, it will: Provide a rigorous professional graduate education with a strong practical emphasis, Conduct policy-relevant research in defence, national security, international relations, strategic studies and diplomacy, Foster a global network of like-minded professional schools. GRADUATE EDUCATION IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS RSIS offers a challenging graduate education in international affairs, taught by an international faculty of leading thinkers and practitioners. The Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree programmes in Strategic Studies, International Relations and International Political Economy are distinguished by their focus on the Asia Pacific, the professional practice of international affairs, and the cultivation of academic depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics for Investors Geopolitics Geopolitics for Investors
    Malmgren GEOPOLITICS INVESTORS FOR GEOPOLITICS FOR INVESTORS Pippa Malmgren CELEBRATING 50 YEARS OF RESEARCH GEOPOLITICS FOR INVESTORS Pippa Malmgren Statement of Purpose The CFA Institute Research Foundation is a not-for-profit organization established to promote the development and dissemination of relevant research for investment practitioners worldwide. Neither the Research Foundation, CFA Institute, nor the publication’s edi- torial staff is responsible for facts and opinions presented in this publi- cation. This publication reflects the views of the author(s) and does not represent the official views of the CFA Institute Research Foundation. The CFA Institute Research Foundation and the Research Foundation logo are trademarks owned by The CFA Institute Research Foundation. CFA®, Chartered Financial Analyst®, AIMR-PPS®, and GIPS® are just a few of the trademarks owned by CFA Institute. To view a list of CFA Institute trademarks and the Guide for the Use of CFA Institute Marks, please visit our website at www.cfainstitute.org. © 2015 The CFA Institute Research Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. ISBN 978-1-934667-83-5 3 March 2015 Editorial Staff Stephen Smith Cindy Maisannes Editor Manager, Publications Production Pat Light Christina Hampton Assistant Editor Publishing Technology Specialist Biography Philippa “Pippa” Malmgren is president and founder of the DRPM Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepening Ties, 1945–1975
    Part Two / Deepening Ties, 1945–1975 EE&Efinal.indd&Efinal.indd Sec1:67Sec1:67 55/17/09/17/09 88:59:59:59:59 AAMM “Nang Yai” by Kamol Thatsanayachalee, a Thai artist based in Los Angeles, California. 68 The Eagle and the Elephant EE&Efinal.indd&Efinal.indd Sec1:68Sec1:68 55/17/09/17/09 88:59:59:59:59 AAMM Peace Proclaimed Japan’s surrender on August 14, 1945, the king’s regent issued a peace proclamation stating that Thailand’s 1942 declaration of war on FollowingBritain and the United States was null and void because it was unconstitutional and contrary to the will of the Thai people. On August 21, U.S. Secretary of State James Byrnes accepted Thailand’s peace proclamation, which stated: The American government has always believed that the declaration did not represent the will of the Thai people. Accordingly, we disregarded that declaration and have continued to recognize the Thai minister in Washington as the minister of Thailand, although, of course, we did not recognize the Thailand government in Bangkok as it was under Japanese control … During the past four years we have regarded Thailand not as an enemy, but as a country to be liberated from the enemy. With that liberation now accomplished we look to the resumption by Thailand of its former place in the community of nations as a free, sovereign, and independent country. Ernest Beverin, the British foreign secretary, expressed a dif- ferent sentiment: Our attitude will depend on the way the Siamese meet the requirements of our troops now about to enter their country; the extent to which they undo the wrongs of their predecessors and make restitution for injury, loss and damage caused to the British and Allied interest; and the extent of their contribution to the restoration of peace, good order and economic rehabilitation.
    [Show full text]