Southsea Hovertravel Site

Structural and Civil Engineering

Flood Risk Assessment for Proposed Development Prepared for Griffon Hoverworks

December 2020

Job No: 20133

Document Ref: 20133-WFB-XX-XX-RO-E-0001 P02

Revision Initial Issue Revision Revision Revision Revision P02 P03 P04 P05 Issue/Status DRAFT Preliminary Report Date December 2020 Dec 20 Prepared by B Morton B Morton Checked by B Morton

Contents

1.0 Introduction and Development Description 1.1 Project Introduction and Objectives 1.2 Planning Policy and Guidance 1.3 Site location 1.4 Topography and Existing Land Use 1.5 Geology

1.6 Hydrological Features

1.7 Proposed Development and Flood risk Vulnerability Classification

2.0 Flood Risk Assessment 2.1 Source of Information 2.2 Flood Hazards 2.3 The Sequential Test & Environment Agency Flood Zone Compatibility

2.4 Flood Risk Mitigation Measures

3.0 Summary and Conclusions

4.0 Closure

Appendices

A: Site Location Plan B: Site Topographic Survey C: Proposed Site Layout Plan

1.0 Introduction and Development Description  Development sites of more than 1 hectare (ha) in Flood Zone 1  Development sites less than 1 ha in Flood Zone 1, including a change of use in development type to a more 1.1 Project Introduction and Objectives vulnerable class (for example from commercial to residential), where they could be affected by sources of flooding other than rivers and the sea (for example surface water drains, reservoirs) WFBA Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers, have been commissioned by Griffon Hoverwork, to undertake a  Development in an area within Flood Zone 1 which has critical drainage problems as notified by the Environment Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) to support the proposed development of an extension to the existing terminal Agency. building at Southsea Hoverport Terminal, Southsea, Portsmouth. This document represents a site-specific FRA for the proposed development. The Agency’s guidance supports the NPPF and specifies the requirements for FRAs based on the level of flood risk and the vulnerability of the proposed development to flooding. 1.2 Planning Policy and Guidance In addition, Environment Agency consent is required for any proposed works or structures, in, under, over or within This Flood Risk Assessment has been undertaken with due regard to the following national and local planning policy eight metres of the top of the bank of the watercourse, designated a ‘main river’, (or sixteen metres in the case of a and flood risk guidance. tidal watercourse).

1.2.1 National Planning Policy

1.2.3 Local Policy and Guidance The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)1 and associated Planning Practice Guidance for Flood Risk2 aim to steer new development to areas with the lowest risk of flooding. The following documents provide local flood risk policy and guidance for development within the city of Portsmouth:

New development must also ensure that flood risk is not increased elsewhere, and where appropriate, planning applications should be supported by a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment.  The Partnership for Urban South Hampshire’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA)4 and Portsmouth City Council’s Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS)5 present details of the regional hydrology, potential The NPPF recommends that development should only be allowed in areas at risk of flooding where the FRA (and sources of flooding across the city and implications for developers. the sequential and exception tests, as applicable) can demonstrate that:  Policy PCS12 of Portsmouth City Council’s Core Strategy6 relates to flood risk and includes the following relevant

statements: a) within the site, the most vulnerable development is located in areas of lowest flood risk, unless there are overriding reasons to prefer a different location. The city council will reduce flood risk by following the flood risk management hierarchy set out in PPS25. The

council will: b) the development is appropriately flood resistant and resilient. . Assess the level of flood risk in making allocations and considering planning applications, in particular by c) it incorporates sustainable drainage systems, unless there is clear evidence that this would be inappropriate. reference to strategic and site-specific flood risk assessments. . Avoid flood risk by: d) any residual risk can be safely managed; and . Taking a sequential approach to site allocations by prioritising those sites at a lower risk of flooding; . Applying the sequential test to planning applications, with the exception of applications for minor e) safe access and escape routes are included where appropriate, as part of an agreed emergency plan. development and for changes of use, including changes of use to residential. The sequential test will be considered met on: The guidance confirms that major developments should incorporate sustainable drainage systems unless there is . Allocated sites; and clear evidence that this would be inappropriate. . Non-allocated brownfield sites in those parts of flood zones 2 and 3 that the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment shows as low or medium hazard areas. 1.2.2 Environment Agency Policy and Guidance . Requiring the exception test to be met in line with PPS25, in particular the requirement that development should be safe over its lifetime. 3 The Environment Agency’s guidance for FRAs confirms that planning applications for the following development . Substitute less vulnerable development types for those incompatible with the degree of flood risk wherever proposals must be supported by a FRA: possible, both in making allocations and on individual development sites. . Control flood risk by:  Development in Flood Zone 2 or 3 including minor development and change of use

4 1 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, February 2019, National Planning Policy Framework. Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH), February 2016, Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, 2016 Update. 5 2 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, March 2014, Planning Practice Guidance, Flood Risk and Portsmouth City Council, March 2015, Local Flood Risk Management Strategy. Coastal Change. 6 Portsmouth City Council, The Portsmouth Plan, Portsmouth’s Core Strategy, Adopted January 2012. 3 Environment Agency, March 2014 (updated February 2017), Guidance – Flood Risk Assessments if you’re applying for planning permission.

. Maintaining and improving the city’s flood defences; . Seeking contributions towards flood defences from development; . Where necessary, controlling flood risk on individual sites through on site flood risk management measures; . Seeking opportunities to improve the capacity problems of the existing sewer system, including through the promotion of a link between the east and west interceptor sewers; Portsmouth Application Site . Permitting new developments only where the necessary surface water drainage, foul drainage and sewage Harbour treatment capacity is available, or where additional capacity will be provided in time to serve any individual phase of the development without unacceptably reducing the level of service to existing users, or causing harm to the environment; and . Requiring surface water to be separated within the site and the post development rate of discharge of both surface and foul water to the combined system should be no greater than the existing rate. . Mitigate the residual flood risk that remains after the above steps have been considered by: . Ensuring that the design and layout of development minimises the risk to people and damage to property in the event of flooding; and . Having in place effective emergency response plans.

1.3 Site Location Southsea The application site is located off Clarence Esplanade, Southsea, Portsmouth, PO5 3AD, as shown on the Site Location Plan within Appendix 1 and Figure 1 below. The application site is represented by the existing hoverport terminal on the Solent coastline, approximately 1km west of Southsea town centre and 1.5km south-west of Portsmouth city centre.

The Environment Agency’s on-line flood map for planning indicates that virtually the entire application site lies within Flood Zone 3 (high probability of flooding) associated with tidal flooding from the sea. Figure 1. Site Location (image extracted from Portsmouth City Council’s LFRMS)

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and associated technical guidance confirms that all applications 1.4 Topography and Existing Land Use for proposed new development within Flood Zone 2 or 3 and development proposals exceeding one hectare within Flood Zone 1 must be accompanied by a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment. The application site is located on the relatively flat, low-lying Solent coastline at Southsea. Ordnance Survey mapping indicates ground levels in the vicinity of the application site of approximately 4mAOD, rising slightly into Southsea to the East.

A topographic survey is available for the application site and a copy is included as Appendix 2. The site survey confirms that ground levels are relatively consistent across the application site, and in the range 3.3 to 3.5mAOD. Ground levels within the area of proposed development are approximately 3.3 to 3.4mAOD. The existing land use comprises the Southsea hoverport terminal, with the area of proposed development (extension) comprising shingle beach.

The application site is bound to the north-east by Clarence Esplanade, to the north-west by Clarence Pier Pavilion, to the south-west by the Solent and to the south-east by the hovercraft landing stage.

1.5 Geology

British Geological Survey mapping indicates that the local geology beneath the application site comprises sand, silt and clay of the Palaeogene Earnley Sand Formation and Marsh Farm Formation, overlain by superficial Storm Beach Deposits (gravel)7.

The area of proposed development is located on the shingle beach, where incident rainfall will infiltrate to ground.

1.6 Hydrological Features

The application site is located on the South Coast at Southsea, Portsmouth, adjacent to The Solent. There are no watercourses or other surface water features in the vicinity of the application site.

The local hydrological site setting is presented as Figure 2.

River Wallington & Portsmouth Harbour

Application Site

The Solent

Figure 2. Hydrological Setting

1.7 Proposed Development and Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification

The proposed development comprises a two-storey extension to the Griffon Hoverwork’s existing Southsea Hoverport Terminal building. The extension has a footprint of approximately 36m2 and will provide offices, a meeting room, WCs and kitchenette; proposed site layout plans are included within Appendix 3.

In terms of flood risk vulnerability classification, development associated with docks, marinas and wharves and water-based recreation is classified as ‘water-compatible’ development. This is discussed further in Section 2.3.

7 British Geological Survey, Geology of Britain Viewer, accessed 30th November 2020.

2.0 Flood Risk Assessment

2.1 Sources of Information

In addition to the flood risk planning policy and guidance outlined in Section 1.2, the following sources of information have been consulted during the preparation of this FRA:

 Environment Agency website – for information regarding surface water, reservoir and fluvial/tidal flood risk and outline flood zone maps.

The Environment Agency has been consulted for site-specific flood risk information including a detailed flood zone map, predicted flood water levels, details of local flood defences and historic flood outlines; no response had been received at the time of reporting.

2.2 Flood Hazard

All potential sources of flooding to the application site are considered within this section of the report.

2.2.1 Environment Agency Flood Zone Map and Fluvial/Tidal Flood Risk

8 The Environment Agency flood zone map presents information regarding the fluvial and tidal flood risk to the Figure 3. Environment Agency Flood Zone Map application site and is included as Figure 3 below. The flood zone map indicates that the application site is partially within Flood Zone 3 associated with flooding from the sea. Flood Zone 3 is defined as having a high probability of flooding and comprises land assessed as having a 1-in-100 (1%) or greater annual probability of river flooding or a Figure 4 presents an extract of the Environment Agency’s flood risk map for river and sea flooding, which takes into 1-in-200 (0.5%) or greater annual probability of sea flooding. account the presence of any flood defences. This confirms that the footprint of proposed development (outlined in

green) lies predominantly within an area of negligible flood risk but the south-eastern boundary encroaches into an area of high flood risk (greater than 3.3% annual probability of flooding).

8 www.flood-map-for-planning.service.gov.uk accessed 30th November 2020.

2.2.2 Other Potential Sources of Flooding

The local SFRA, LFRMS and online flood maps have been reviewed to identify any other potential sources of flood risk to the application site and evidence of historic flood events in the local area. This information is presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Southsea Hoverport – Potential Sources of Flooding Potential Risk Potential Source at Application Reasoning Site? There are no watercourses in the vicinity of the application Fluvial Flooding No site.

The Environment Agency’s flood zone map for planning Tidal Flooding Yes indicates that the application site is located partially within Flood Zone 3 associated with sea flooding. Figure 20 of the LFRMS confirms that the application site is not within a target area or region for groundwater flood risk management. Flooding from High The application site is coastal where the risk of No Groundwater groundwater flooding is generally negligible. The SFRA online map confirms there are no recorded Figure 4. Environment Agency River/Sea Flood Risk Map groundwater flooding incidents in the vicinity of the application site. Site-specific predicted flood water level data has been requested from the Environment Agency but has not been The Environment Agency’s online mapping confirms that Surface Water received at the time of reporting. No the application site has a very low (<0.1% annual Flooding probability) of surface water flooding. However, review of the flood extent (Figure 4) and the site topography (Appendix 2) indicates a predicted flood The application site is coastal with drainage from the water level of approximately 3.4mAOD for the high risk (>3.3% annual probability) scenario. The existing ground limited surrounding development assumed to discharge to levels within the area of proposed development are 3.3 to 3.4mAOD, indicating a potential flood water depth of approximately 0.1m. It is uncertain, from existing data, if flood water depths would be higher during less frequent Flooding from sea. flood events and this should be confirmed following receipt of Environment Agency site-specific flood data. Artificial Drainage No The SFRA online map confirms there are no recorded Systems sewer flooding incidents in the vicinity of the application

site. Online mapping from the 2016 PUSH SFRA, includes details of local flood defence infrastructure. This indicates that the coastal frontage adjacent to the application site offers a standard of protection of between 1-in-50 years (2% annual probability) and 1-in-100 years (1% annual probability), based on 2007 data. Review of the Environment Agency’s online mapping Flooding due to No confirms the application site is not within the predicted Infrastructure Failure However, the application site lies within the Southsea Coastal Scheme, a £100m flood defence scheme of which maximum extent of flooding of local reservoir(s). Phase 1 construction commenced in September 2020. The impact of this scheme on predicted flood water levels within the application site is currently unknown. In the vicinity of the application site the proposed defences include widening the existing beach combined with a stepped revetment defence. Table 1 confirms that the only potential source of flood risk identified within the application site is the risk of flooding from the However, appropriate flood risk mitigation measures for the proposed development are discussed below in Section sea. The tidal flood risk is detailed in Section 2.2.1 and appropriate mitigation measures are discussed below in 2.4. Section 2.4.

 Flood resilient design shall be incorporated within the development to a minimum elevation of 600mm above external ground levels. These measures could include raised electrical sockets, wiring and meters, non-return 2.2.3 Historic Flooding valves on drainage and the use of water compatible flooring and other materials.

Review of the Environment Agency’s online historic flood map confirms that the application site is not within an area  The application site is located within an Environment Agency Flood Warning Area; Griffon Hoverwork shall sign that has previously recorded flooding9. up to the Agency’s free flood warning service and follow published guidance in the event of a flood warning being issued. The application site is located within the Environment Agency Flood Warning Area: Coast at Southsea.

Although there will be a slight increase in impermeable surface area as a result of the development, the application site is on the coastline at Southsea with surface water runoff discharging directly to the sea, with no requirement for 2.2.4 Climate Change attenuation. Therefore, the site’s existing surface water drainage scheme remains appropriate.

It is recognised that peak river flows and sea levels are predicted to increase as a result of climate change, and this must be considered within new development design. The application site lies within the South East river basin district. Review of the Environment Agency’s guidance on climate change allowances10 indicates a potential worse- case sea level rise of between 1.2m (higher central, 70th%ile) and 1.6m (upper end, 95th%ile) from 2000 to 2125.

The Southsea Coastal Scheme flood defence investment project aims to address current and long-term flood risk at Southsea due to future sea level rise. 3.0 Summary and Conclusions

Appropriate flood risk mitigation measures for the proposed development are outlined in Section 2.4. This report represents a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment to support the proposed development of an extension

to the existing terminal building at Southsea Hoverport Terminal, Southsea, Portsmouth, PO5 3AD. The application 2.3 The Sequential Test & Environment Agency Flood Zone Compatibility site is located on the coast at Southsea, with the area of proposed development on the shingle beach.

As set out in the NPPF, the aim of the Sequential Test is to steer new development to areas with the lowest The Environment Agency flood zone map for planning indicates that the application site is partially within Flood probability of flooding. It is recognised however, that the proposed development represents an extension to an Zone 3 (high probability of flooding) associated with flooding from the sea; therefore, a detailed site-specific FRA is existing facility and therefore it is not appropriate to consider potential alternative sites. required.

The Environment Agency’s flood zone map indicates that the footprint of proposed development lies partially within A review of all potential sources of flooding to the application site has been undertaken and no other sources of high probability Flood Zone 3. Table 3 of the Environment Agency’s flood risk assessment guidance3 presents a flood risk have been identified. matrix assessing the appropriateness of new development based on its flood risk vulnerability and flood zone status.

The proposed development of an extension to the existing Southsea Hoverport terminal is classified as ‘water There is no record of historic flooding within, or in the immediate vicinity of the application site. However, the wider compatible’ in flood risk terms and Table 3 of the guidance confirms this to be appropriate development within Flood Southsea area has experienced historic flooding and the application site is within the Southsea Coastal Scheme, a Zone 3. £100m flood defence scheme of which Phase 1 construction commenced in September 2020.

It is acknowledged however, that the application site is coastal and within an area at risk of flooding from the sea, However, due to the risk of tidal flooding from the coast, a number of flood risk mitigation measures are proposed: therefore flood risk mitigation measures are proposed, as outlined in Section 2.4.  The finished floor level of the proposed development will be a minimum of 300mm above external ground levels 2.4 Flood Risk Mitigation Measures (equivalent to a minimum finished floor level of 3.75mAOD).

The following flood risk mitigation measures are proposed for the development:  Flood resilient design shall be incorporated within the development to a minimum elevation of 600mm above external ground levels. These measures could include raised electrical sockets, wiring and meters, non-return  The finished floor level of the proposed development will be a minimum of 300mm above external ground levels valves on drainage and the use of water compatible flooring and other materials. (equivalent to a minimum finished floor level of 3.75mAOD).

9https://environment.data.gov.uk/DefraDataDownload/?mapService=EA/HistoricFloodMap&Mode=spatial 10 Environment Agency, February 2016 (updated December 2019), Guidance: Flood Risk Assessments: Climate accessed 30th November 2020. Change Allowances.

 The application site is located within an Environment Agency Flood Warning Area; Griffon Hoverwork shall sign up to the Agency’s free flood warning service and follow published guidance in the event of a flood warning being issued.

The footprint of the proposed development is just 36m2, with surface water runoff discharging directly to the beach/sea and no potential for increased flood risk to others, therefore there is no requirement to review the site’s existing surface water drainage scheme.

Therefore, this FRA concludes that the development of an extension to the existing hoverport terminal at Southsea, classified as ‘water compatible’ development, is appropriate and sustainable with regards to flood risk.

4.0 Closure

This report has been prepared by Nicola Sugg (trading style of NSugg Limited) with all reasonable skill and care, and in accordance with the services agreed with WFBA Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers. Relevant information provided by WFBA Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is based on the relevant guidance and legislation in force at the date of the report and should be reviewed if such guidance and legislation are amended or superseded.

This report is for the exclusive use of WFBA Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers and Griffon Hoverwork; no warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from WFBA.

Appendix A: Site Location Plan

Und Notes

Shelters Ordnance Survey Licence Number 100022432

Site Application Boundary

Site in Applicant's Leasehold

Clarence Pier Pavilion PC TCBs

PC CLARENCE ESPLANADE Portsea Island 1.5m

TCBs

The Clarence LONG CURTAIN ROAD (PH)

Pavilion

PIER ROAD

Motel

ESS CR

Ward Bdy

Play Area

P Amusement Shelter Park P El Sub Sta 2.1m P

P P P

LB

Line Of Posts Bols

P P P Und P

Shelters Bol

Clarence Pier P PC Pavilion P Car Park TCBs Bol Landing Stage CLARENCE ESPLANADE PC P

TCBs

Bol

Bols Shelter

P P Bols

Bols P

Bols Low Tidal Level High Tidal Level Southsea Hoverport (Passenger Ferry Terminal) P

Low Tidal Level High Tidal Level P

Trafalgar Southsea Hoverport Monument Chesapeake 3.4m Monument

(Passenger Ferry Terminal) CLARENCE ESPLANADE

Peel Memorial

10 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100m Location Plan 1:1250

Trafalgar

Monument A 04-11-20 Ownership / Boundary Details Updates SS SS Rev. Date Description Drawn Check

Canute Chambers Canute Road Southampton Hampshire SO14 3AB

Client Griffon Hoverwork Chesapeake Project Hovercraft Terminal, Southsea Monument Title Existing Site Location PLan HTS - BSL - ZZ - XX - DR - A - 1001 - PR - A BS1192 Project Originator Volume Level Type Role Series Number Suitability Revision

N B+S Ref. Date Scale @ A1 Drawn Checked

20085 Oct 2020 As Drawn SS SS

Tel: 023 8063 1432 www.boyleandsummers.co.uk

Other than for the purposes of planning, do not scale these drawings. Use written dimensions only. All dimensions to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Site Plan 5 0 5 10 15 20 25m PRELIMINARY This drawing is © Boyle+Summers Ltd and may not be reproduced, copied or altered in any way 1:250 without written authority.

Appendix B : Site Topographic Survey

2.85

kb

2.94

paved 2.96

ic 3.43 2.94 utl dk

3.27 2.97

cw lp 3.45 u/s canopy 6.01 kb 3.59

cw kb Sta bin 3.54 3.47

bol 3.52

gsc u/s canopy wsv 3.50 6.27 bol 3.51 3.52 3.27 paved 3.51 u/s eaves dk ridge 9.98 paved 11.35 g 3.27 3.01 3.44

3.53 ic 3.44 utl Sta 2.95 btic 3.54 kb rs rg 3.50 2.96 paved 3.62 col 5.58 *limited access 3.49 Clarence Esplanade

ridge ic 11.35 3.53 3.07 3.52 kb utl 3.61 3.55 col paved 5.58 wsv 3.60 3.56 3.53 bus shelter rack lte sales kiosks* u/s canopy 3.55 6.16 6.27 3.525.84 decking canopy 3.49 cycle store col 3.53 3.46 5.55 3.54 open roof 3.53 rg conc canopy 1.10h mrf rack 3.40 3.53 ic u/s canopy 3.45 3.48 5.74 ridge utl 3.53 col 6.54 3.47 bin 5.55 5.85 col 3.53 ridge 6.36 11.35 3.53 5.81 mrf FFL 3.53 3.53 3.04 5.86 u/s canopy 3.33 5.73 3.32 *limited access Sta 5.52 col

3.47 mh 3.45 3.63 gate utl st 3.44 kb ridge 6.35 decking 4.77 dis gate col col col alley * 5.49 3.38 3.32 wsv 3.52 ic paved rg shingle beach conc g 2.94 utl col ic 5.56 utl Sta g dis mh conc 3.10 3.31 utl ladies ht 5.98 3.44 3.50 col 5.90 st ramp kb 3.32 u/s 6.14 min hd 3.38 3.38 6.97 reception mh conc u/s 6.16 cill3.61 3.30 hd 5.71 ht 5.98 3.52 lp gate * 3.56 3.53 2.10 3.37 u/s 7.81 3.51 po c 3.52 sign office sign 3.36 * top bk w 3.57 3.36 ht 5.99 reception 5.19 Sta bk w 3.59 3.54 ht 5.99 3.12 bk w 3.57 bin 3.52 u/s canopy u/s 6.70 3.53 top cw 5.75 po ht 5.98 cw top bk w 3.56 ht 9.00 conc 6.50 3.47 u/s 7.99 elects po waiting 3.59 bin po hd 5.73 col u/s7.82 3.56 3.57 FFL 3.61 po cill4.60 store 3.56 conc 3.60 er po kb 3.79 min hd 7.03 conc 3.59 kb po 3.57 st 3.58 ramp bk w

7.45 min hd6.11 3.58 po po 3.59 3.40 3.81 top bk w u/s 6.69 1.10h mrf cill4.59 6.04 cw 3.40 paved 3.60 3.35 cw hd 5.73 shingle beach conc 0.35 po landing stage 3.27 3.61 dk top cw 3.11 po po 3.29 3.57 3.80 2.00 kb po u/s canopy 3.06 5.75 3.60 shingle beach cctv 3.10 po 3.07 3.81 cw bk w Sta

po po 3.64 3.80 conc 3.74

conc

3.37 dk 3.37

kb landing stage 0.31 conc 3.68

landing stage conc

3.03

1.71

Sta

conc 3.16 landing stage

conc 1.69

0.12

shingle beach

1.48

Appendix C: Proposed Site Layout Plan

paved

ic utl dk

cw lp u/s canopy kb

cw kb bin

bol void gsc u/s canopy wsv bol

paved u/s eaves dk ridge paved g netted void over cycle storage area

ic utl

btic

CLARENCE ESPLANADE kb canopy above rs rg paved void col fire exit Clarence Esplanade CLARENCE PIER PAVILION ridge ic kb utl

col paved wsv void bus shelter rack lte sales kiosks* u/s canopy Proposed decking canopy cycle store First Floor col open roof Office and Meeting Room rg conc canopy (Layout TBC) 1.10h mrf rack ic alley u/s canopy FFL ridge utl 6.21 col bin 6.21 ridge col canopy above mrf

u/s canopy plinth

col waiting mh roof void* gate utl svp st ridge decking dis gate col col cyl col alley *

gents Proposed wsv paved Ground Floor ic conc g WCs, Kitchenette utl col ic and Office utl shingle beach g (Layout TBC) dis

ladies ht lobby

col ramp

reception mh conc

lp * gate po office c sign * sign reception bk w

bk w bin

po cw top bk w conc elects po waiting bin First Floor Plan po col 1:100

po First Floor Plan store er conc po kb

conc po st ramp bk w

po po top bk w u/s 1.10h mrf cw paved cw

po conc landing stage po po Canute Chambers Canute Road po Southampton shingle beach cctv Hampshire SO14 3AB po

cw bk w Client Griffon Hoverwork

Project Hovercraft Terminal, Southsea po po conc Ground Floor Plan Title Proposed Floor Plans 1:100 conc HTS - BSL - ZZ - XX - DR - A - 2005 - DF BS1192 Project Originator Volume Level Type Role Series Number Suitability Revision

B+S Ref. Date Scale @ A1 Drawn Checked DRAFT N 20085 Oct 2020 1:100 SS SS landing stage conc Tel: 023 8063 1432 www.boyleandsummers.co.uk

Other than for the purposes of planning, do not scale these drawings. Use written dimensions landing stage only. All dimensions to be checked on site prior to commencement of work.

1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10m conc This drawing is © Boyle+Summers Ltd and may not be reproduced, copied or altered in any way without written authority.