Brivio Workshop IMATI 27-03-2012 Last
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aerial Surveys of Wildlife and Human Activity Across the Bouba N'djida
Aerial Surveys of Wildlife and Human Activity Across the Bouba N’djida - Sena Oura - Benoue - Faro Landscape Northern Cameroon and Southwestern Chad April - May 2015 Paul Elkan, Roger Fotso, Chris Hamley, Soqui Mendiguetti, Paul Bour, Vailia Nguertou Alexandre, Iyah Ndjidda Emmanuel, Mbamba Jean Paul, Emmanuel Vounserbo, Etienne Bemadjim, Hensel Fopa Kueteyem and Kenmoe Georges Aime Wildlife Conservation Society Ministry of Forests and Wildlife (MINFOF) L'Ecole de Faune de Garoua Funded by the Great Elephant Census Paul G. Allen Foundation and WCS SUMMARY The Bouba N’djida - Sena Oura - Benoue - Faro Landscape is located in north Cameroon and extends into southwest Chad. It consists of Bouba N’djida, Sena Oura, Benoue and Faro National Parks, in addition to 25 safari hunting zones. Along with Zakouma NP in Chad and Waza NP in the Far North of Cameroon, the landscape represents one of the most important areas for savanna elephant conservation remaining in Central Africa. Aerial wildlife surveys in the landscape were first undertaken in 1977 by Van Lavieren and Esser (1979) focusing only on Bouba N’djida NP. They documented a population of 232 elephants in the park. After a long period with no systematic aerial surveys across the area, Omondi et al (2008) produced a minimum count of 525 elephants for the entire landscape. This included 450 that were counted in Bouba N’djida NP and its adjacent safari hunting zones. The survey also documented a high richness and abundance of other large mammals in the Bouba N’djida NP area, and to the southeast of Faro NP. In the period since 2010, a number of large-scale elephant poaching incidents have taken place in Bouba N’djida NP. -
Distribution Mapping of World Grassland Types A
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2014) SYNTHESIS Distribution mapping of world grassland types A. P. Dixon1*, D. Faber-Langendoen2, C. Josse2, J. Morrison1 and C. J. Loucks1 1World Wildlife Fund – United States, 1250 ABSTRACT 24th Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, Aim National and international policy frameworks, such as the European USA, 2NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Drive, Union’s Renewable Energy Directive, increasingly seek to conserve and refer- 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, USA ence ‘highly biodiverse grasslands’. However, to date there is no systematic glo- bal characterization and distribution map for grassland types. To address this gap, we first propose a systematic definition of grassland. We then integrate International Vegetation Classification (IVC) grassland types with the map of Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW). Location Global. Methods We developed a broad definition of grassland as a distinct biotic and ecological unit, noting its similarity to savanna and distinguishing it from woodland and wetland. A grassland is defined as a non-wetland type with at least 10% vegetation cover, dominated or co-dominated by graminoid and forb growth forms, and where the trees form a single-layer canopy with either less than 10% cover and 5 m height (temperate) or less than 40% cover and 8 m height (tropical). We used the IVC division level to classify grasslands into major regional types. We developed an ecologically meaningful spatial cata- logue of IVC grassland types by listing IVC grassland formations and divisions where grassland currently occupies, or historically occupied, at least 10% of an ecoregion in the TEOW framework. Results We created a global biogeographical characterization of the Earth’s grassland types, describing approximately 75% of IVC grassland divisions with ecoregions. -
The MODIS Global Vegetation Fractional Cover Product 2001–2018: Characteristics of Vegetation Fractional Cover in Grasslands and Savanna Woodlands
remote sensing Article The MODIS Global Vegetation Fractional Cover Product 2001–2018: Characteristics of Vegetation Fractional Cover in Grasslands and Savanna Woodlands Michael J. Hill 1,2,* and Juan P. Guerschman 1 1 CSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain, ACT 2601, Australia; [email protected] 2 Department of Earth System Science and Policy, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-262465880 Received: 24 December 2019; Accepted: 24 January 2020; Published: 28 January 2020 Abstract: Vegetation Fractional Cover (VFC) is an important global indicator of land cover change, land use practice and landscape, and ecosystem function. In this study, we present the Global Vegetation Fractional Cover Product (GVFCP) and explore the levels and trends in VFC across World Grassland Type (WGT) Ecoregions considering variation associated with Global Livestock Production Systems (GLPS). Long-term average levels and trends in fractional cover of photosynthetic vegetation (FPV), non-photosynthetic vegetation (FNPV), and bare soil (FBS) are mapped, and variation among GLPS types within WGT Divisions and Ecoregions is explored. Analysis also focused on the savanna-woodland WGT Formations. Many WGT Divisions showed wide variation in long-term average VFC and trends in VFC across GLPS types. Results showed large areas of many ecoregions experiencing significant positive and negative trends in VFC. East Africa, Patagonia, and the Mitchell Grasslands of Australia exhibited large areas of negative trends in FNPV and positive trends FBS. These trends may reflect interactions between extended drought, heavy livestock utilization, expanded agriculture, and other land use changes. Compared to previous studies, explicit measurement of FNPV revealed interesting additional information about vegetation cover and trends in many ecoregions. -
Tropical Grasslands--Trends, Perspectives and Future Prospects
University of Kentucky UKnowledge International Grassland Congress Proceedings XXIII International Grassland Congress Tropical Grasslands--Trends, Perspectives and Future Prospects Panjab Singh FAARD Foundation, India Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc Part of the Plant Sciences Commons, and the Soil Science Commons This document is available at https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/23/plenary/8 The XXIII International Grassland Congress (Sustainable use of Grassland Resources for Forage Production, Biodiversity and Environmental Protection) took place in New Delhi, India from November 20 through November 24, 2015. Proceedings Editors: M. M. Roy, D. R. Malaviya, V. K. Yadav, Tejveer Singh, R. P. Sah, D. Vijay, and A. Radhakrishna Published by Range Management Society of India This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Grassland Congress Proceedings by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plenary Lecture 7 Tropical grasslands –trends, perspectives and future prospects Panjab Singh President, FAARD Foundation, Varanasi and Ex Secretary, DARE and DG, ICAR, New Delhi, India E-mail : [email protected] Grasslands are the area covered by vegetation accounts for 50–80 percent of GDP (World Bank, 2007). dominated by grasses, with little or no tree cover. Central and South America provide 39 percent of the UNESCO defined grassland as “land covered with world’s meat production from grassland-based herbaceous plants with less than 10 percent tree and systems, and sub-Saharan Africa holds a 12.5 percent shrub cover” and wooded grassland as 10-40 percent share. -
A Spatial Analysis Approach to the Global Delineation of Dryland Areas of Relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands
A spatial analysis approach to the global delineation of dryland areas of relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands Prepared by Levke Sörensen at the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK January 2007 This report was prepared at the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). The lead author is Levke Sörensen, scholar of the Carlo Schmid Programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Acknowledgements This report benefited from major support from Peter Herkenrath, Lera Miles and Corinna Ravilious. UNEP-WCMC is also grateful for the contributions of and discussions with Jaime Webbe, Programme Officer, Dry and Subhumid Lands, at the CBD Secretariat. Disclaimer The contents of the map presented here do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 Table of contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................3 Disclaimer ...........................................................................................................3 List of tables, annexes and maps .....................................................................5 Abbreviations -
A New Size Record for the West African Egg-Eating Snake Dasypeltis Gansi Trape & Mane, 2006, with New Distribution Records
ISSN 0067-9208 NATURAL SCIENCES VOLUME 29, PART 2 NOVEMBER 2013 First records of the egg-eating snake Dasypeltis confusa Trape & Mané, 2006 in Nigeria and Chad, with range extensions for Ghana by Michael F. Bates Department of Herpetology, National Museum, P.O. Box 266, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Bates, M.F. 2013. First records of the egg-eating snake Dasypeltis confusa Trape & Mané, 2006 in Nigeria and Chad, with range extensions for Ghana. Navors. nas. Mus., Bloemfontein 29(2): 17-27. New records are provided for the egg-eating snake Dasypeltis confusa from three West African countries. These include the first records of this species for Nigeria, based on specimens from four localities (Jos and Zonkwa areas) in the centre of the country; and the first record for Chad, based on a specimen from Mayo-Kebbi in the south-west of the country. In addition, the known range in Ghana is extended to Yabraso in the central part of the country and the town of Wa in the north-west. The absence of records in several areas of apparently suitable savanna habitat in west and central Africa suggest that this species may have a much more extensive range than currently known. (Dasypeltis confusa, distribution, West Africa, Nigeria, Chad, Ghana) ISBN 978-1-86847-154-6 18 Navors. nas. Mus., Bloemfontein, Volume 29, Part 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 18 MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................................................ -
The Trans-Boundary Mara River Basin Strategic Environmental Assessment (Mrb Sea)
THE TRANS-BOUNDARY MARA RIVER BASIN STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (MRB SEA) March 2012 2012 © Rights reserved by Lake Victoria Basin Commission Cover Photographs by Peter Jon Nelson: “Next Generation” Children in Narok County “New Economy” Motor Cycle Riders, Bomet County “Natural Resources” Mara River and Swamp with Fishing Boat, Musoma Rural District Report prepared for LVBC, WWF, USAID and the Governments of Tanzania and Kenya by: Peter Jon Nelson (SEA Coordinator, Environmental Scientist and Planner), Joakim Nyarangi (Planner and GIS Specialist) & Zachary Kimutai Maritim (GIS Manager (WWF) Assisted by the following WWF Staff: Dr. Taye Teferi (Conservation Director), Mohamed Awer (Country Director, Kenya), Batula Awale (Programme Manager), Dr. Seif Hamisi (Project Coordinator), Francis Ole Nkako (Policy Advisor), Kevin Gichangi (Narok Office Manager), William Kasanga (Musoma Office Manager) and by all participants at the Fairmont and Narok Workshops. Strategic Environmental Assessment (MRB SEA) | iii Acknowledgements The authors of this report wish to acknowledge the hard work and constant support offered by the staff of WWF in its ANairobi, Dar Es Salaam, Narok and Musoma offices, especially Batula, Hamisi and Francis, the office team who worked through weekends and drivers who spent long days on the road. A large number of officers in national, regional or district offices and the field, contributed time and information which is greatly appreciated. It is not practical to list them here but their names are recorded in the official records of the various workshops. Finally, special thanks go to the participants at the two SEA Workshops, and in particular the Tanzanian delegation who travelled the extra distance from their bases to the Fairmont and Narok Workshops. -
Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Soil Streptomycetes With
Hamid et al. BMC Microbiology (2020) 20:33 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-1717-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Diversity and geographic distribution of soil streptomycetes with antagonistic potential against actinomycetoma-causing Streptomyces sudanensis in Sudan and South Sudan Mohamed E. Hamid1,2,3, Thomas Reitz1,4, Martin R. P. Joseph2, Kerstin Hommel1, Adil Mahgoub3, Mogahid M. Elhassan5, François Buscot1,4 and Mika Tarkka1,4* Abstract Background: Production of antibiotics to inhibit competitors affects soil microbial community composition and contributes to disease suppression. In this work, we characterized whether Streptomyces bacteria, prolific antibiotics producers, inhibit a soil borne human pathogenic microorganism, Streptomyces sudanensis. S. sudanensis represents the major causal agent of actinomycetoma – a largely under-studied and dreadful subcutaneous disease of humans in the tropics and subtropics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro S. sudanensis inhibitory potential of soil streptomycetes isolated from different sites in Sudan, including areas with frequent (mycetoma belt) and rare actinomycetoma cases of illness. Results: Using selective media, 173 Streptomyces isolates were recovered from 17 sites representing three ecoregions and different vegetation and ecological subdivisions in Sudan. In total, 115 strains of the 173 (66.5%) displayed antagonism against S. sudanensis with different levels of inhibition. Strains isolated from the South Saharan steppe and woodlands ecoregion (Northern Sudan) exhibited higher inhibitory potential than those strains isolated from the East Sudanian savanna ecoregion located in the south and southeastern Sudan, or the strains isolated from the Sahelian Acacia savanna ecoregion located in central and western Sudan. According to 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, isolates were predominantly related to Streptomyces werraensis, S. -
Information on Uganda.Pdf
ABOUT UGANDA HISTORY Uganda, popularly known as the ‘The Pearl of Africa’ is located in East Africa and lies astride the equator. It is a land-locked country bordered by Kenya in the East, Tanzania in the South, Rwanda in the Southwest, Democratic Republic of Congo in the West and Sudan in the North. The southern part of the country includes a substantial portion of Lake Victoria, shared with Kenya and Tanzania, situating the country in the African Great Lakes region. Uganda also lies within the Nile basin, and has a varied but generally equatorial climate. Uganda takes its name from the Buganda kingdom, which encompasses a large portion of the south of the country including the capital Kampala. GENERAL FACTS Time Zone GTM+3 Currency Uganda Shilling (UGX) Exchange Rate USD 1= 2,700 UGX Official Languages English & Swahili Electricity 220 – 240 V AC, Three pin plug Religion Predominantly Christian Mobile Operators MTN, Airtel, Uganda Telecom, Orange, Smile, Sure, K2 Telecom International Dialling Code +256 plus code number, followed by 6 digit local number Fire and Police 999 and 112 Visa Valid passport and visa (acquired at point of entry) POPULATION The current estimated population of Uganda is 35 million. Uganda has a very young population, with a median age of 15 years. Uganda is home to many different ethnic groups, none of whom forms a majority of the population. The population of Uganda consists of: Baganda 16.9%, Banyakole 9.5%, Basoga 8.4%, Bakiga 6.9%, Iteso 6.4%, Langi 6.1%, Acholi 4.7%, Bagisu 4.6%, Lugbara 4.2%, Banyoro 2.7%, other 29.6% There are around 20,000 White residents in Uganda. -
A Cladistically Based Reinterpretation of the Taxonomy of Two
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysA 415: cladistically 81–132 (2013) based reinterpretation of the taxonomy of two Afrotropical tenebrionid genera... 81 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.415.6406 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A cladistically based reinterpretation of the taxonomy of two Afrotropical tenebrionid genera Ectateus Koch, 1956 and Selinus Mulsant & Rey, 1853 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Platynotina) Marcin Jan Kamiński1,† 1 Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland † http://zoobank.org/967D4DC1-36D9-47DB-96F8-C06214F93C19 Corresponding author: Marcin Jan Kamiński ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Bouchard | Received 7 October 2013 | Accepted 12 December 2013 | Published 12 June 2014 http://zoobank.org/372DF48D-D163-4742-AABF-5D7E4913050C Citation: Kamiński MJ (2013) A cladistically based reinterpretation of the taxonomy of two Afrotropical tenebrionid genera Ectateus Koch, 1956 and Selinus Mulsant & Rey, 1853 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Platynotina). In: Bouchard P, Smith AD (Eds) Proceedings of the Third International Tenebrionoidea Symposium, Arizona, USA, 2013. ZooKeys 415: 81–132. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.415.6406 Abstract On the basis of a newly performed cladistic analysis a new classification of the representatives of two Afrotropical tenebrionid genera, Ectateus Koch, 1956 and Selinus Mulsant & Rey, 1853 sensu Iwan 2002a, is provided. Eleoselinus is described as a new genus. The genus Monodius, previously synonymized with Selinus by Iwan (2002), is redescribed and considered as a separate genus. Following new combinations are proposed: Ectateus calcaripes (Gebien, 1904), Monodius laevistriatus (Fairmaire, 1897), Monodius lamottei (Gridelli, 1954), Monodius plicicollis (Fairmaire, 1897), Eleoselinus villiersi (Ardoin, 1965) and Eleoselinus ursynowiensis (Kamiński, 2011). -
Pdfbirdlife International, Dangered Species: the Bearded Vulture Gypaetus Barbatus As an Example
Biological Conservation 227 (2018) 390–402 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon State of the world's raptors: Distributions, threats, and conservation T recommendations ⁎ Christopher J.W. McClurea, , James R.S. Westripb, Jeff A. Johnsonc, Sarah E. Schulwitza, Munir Z. Virania, Robert Daviesd, Andrew Symesb, Hannah Wheatleyb, Russell Thorstroma, Arjun Amare, Ralph Buijf, Victoria R. Jonesb, Nick P. Williamsg, Evan R. Buechleyh,i, Stuart H.M. Butchartb,j a The Peregrine Fund, 5668 West Flying Hawk Lane, Boise, ID 83709, USA b BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK c University of North Texas, Department of Biological Sciences, Advanced Environmental Research Institute, 1155 Union Circle, #310559, Denton, TX 76203, USA d Habitat Info, Rookwood Studios, Llanunwas, Solva, Pembrokeshire SA62 6UJ, UK e FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa f Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3A, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands g Coordinating Unit of the CMS Raptors MoU, Convention on Migratory Species Office - Abu Dhabi, United Nations Environment Programme, c/o Environment Agency- Abu Dhabi, PO Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates h HawkWatch International, 2240 South 900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84106, USA i Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA j Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Raptors provide critical ecosystem services, yet there is currently no systematic, global synthesis of their con- Ornithology servation status or threats. -
How Effective Are the Protected Areas of East Africa?
Global Ecology and Conservation 17 (2019) e00573 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original Research Article How effective are the protected areas of East Africa? * Jason Riggio a, , Andrew P. Jacobson b, c, Robert J. Hijmans d, Tim Caro a a Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA b Nicholas School of the Environment, Box 90328, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA c Center for the Environment, Catawba College, Salisbury, NC, USA d Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA article info abstract Article history: Protected areas are the cornerstone of in situ conservation and their effective management Received 3 November 2018 is critical for maintaining biodiversity in the long term. In East Africa (Burundi, Kenya, Received in revised form 19 February 2019 Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda) there are 1,776 protected areas (including 186 “strict” Accepted 20 February 2019 protected areas with IUCN management categories I through IV) covering more than 27% of its terrestrial area. Here we document the extent to which East African protected areas Keywords: encompass ecoregions and endemic terrestrial vertebrate taxa, and using new land con- Biodiversity version data derived from medium to high spatial resolution satellite images, we assess Conservation prioritization fi Effectiveness how they have been encroached upon by agriculture and other land use. We nd that East > Endemic species African protected areas cover 86% of ecoregions well ( 10% threshold of ecoregion National parks representativeness set by the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi Target 11), some Representativeness very well (>90% - Rwenzori-Virunga montane moorlands and East African montane moorlands).