DOCSLIB.ORG

British Columbia Coal Industry Overview 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

British Columbia Coal Industry Overview 2020 Information Circular 2021-02 Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation Mines, Competitiveness, and Authorizations Division British Columbia Geological Survey Front Cover: PCI coal (pulverized coal injection) being mined at Brule mine, Peace River coalfi eld, northeastern British Columbia. Photo by Dave Thompson used with permission of Conuma Coal Resources Limited. Back Cover: Remnant of ‘upper seam’, South pit, Brule mine, Peace River coalfi eld, northeastern British Columbia. Photo by Paul Jago. This publication is available, free of charge, from the British Columbia Geological Survey website: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/mineral-exploration-mining/british-columbia-geological- survey/publications Victoria British Columbia Canada January 2021 i British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, British Columbia Geological Survey Information Circular 2021-02 British Columbia coal industry overview 2020 British Columbia Geological Survey Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation Introduction molybdenum 0.7% silver 0.5% Metallurgical coal prices fl uctuated markedly in 2020. aggregate 4.6% zinc 0.5% Coking coal prices dropped to less than $100/tonne US per industrial lead 0.1% tonne because of disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic minerals 5.4% and global trade tensions (Fig. 1). Coal production volumes gold for British Columbia are forecast to total 25.1 million tonnes, coal down from 30.0 million tonnes in 2019. Coal remains British 17.0% 42.7% Columbia’s most valuable mined commodity with sales forecast at $3.97 billion for 2020 (Fig. 2), 42.7% of the mining copper 28.5% revenue for the province. Coking coal and PCI (pulverized coal injection) products are currently produced from four mines in the Kootenay Mountains in the southeastern part of the province and from three mines in the Peace coalfi elds in the northeastern Fig. 2. Forecast production value by mined commodity for British part (Fig. 3). Major markets for British Columbia coal include Columbia in 2020. The value of coal production is forecast to be Asian countries, especially Japan, China, and South Korea, and $3.97 billion, representing about 42.7% of all mineral revenue in the province. India. Products are also sold to steel mills in eastern Canada, and to South America and Europe. as steel production and infrastructure work were disrupted. A This pamphlet provides an annual summary of the provincial dispute between Australia and China affected prices through coal industry. It describes the geology of British Columbia’s the fall, and coking coal prices fell below $100/tonne in mid- coal regions, industry trends, coal transportation infrastructure, November. PCI prices averaged between $75 and $80 for the and mining and exploration activities. It also describes the year. tenure system, and lists sources of information and contacts. Production continued at four open-pit mines operated by Teck Coal Limited in the Elk Valley (Fording River, Greenhills, Line 175 Creek, and Elkview). Combined coal production for the year 165 from the Southeast Region is forecast to be 20.9 million tonnes. 155 Conuma Coal Resources Limited continued production at the 145 Brule and Wolverine (Perry Creek) mines in the Peace River USD 135 coalfi eld in the Northeast Region; production was suspended 125 at the Willow Creek mine in the fi rst half of the year due to 115 low prices. The company forecasts its 2020 total production to 105 reach about 4.2 million tonnes. The value of coal production 95 for the province is forecast to total $3.97 billion for 2020, down sharply from $4.42 billion in 2019, due to lower production and lower prices. The value of coal products constituted 42.7% of all mineral sales in the province (Fig. 2) this year. Fig. 1. Coking coal price per tonne in US dollars, November 2019 to As of November 12, new coal licence applications numbered November 2020. four, for a total of 935 hectares (Fig. 4). Three new coal licences covering 768.99 hectares were issued (Fig. 5). No new leases British Columbia coal industry trends and news were issued. A ‘No Registration’ order for the Hat Creek coal in 2020 deposit was rescinded. The order, which had been in place since Metallurgical coal prices fl uctuated through 2020 mainly 1973, prohibited applications for tenure, tenure ownership, due to market disruptions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic exploration and mining. Neptune bulk terminal was shut down (all prices are per tonne, $US, West Coast port price). Prices for capacity upgrades for fi ve months ending in September. for British Columbia hard coking coal (Fig. 1) averaged $127/ tonne for the year. At the start of 2020, the price was about Coalfi elds of British Columbia $142; as Covid-19 forced mines to close in China temporarily The distribution of Upper Jurassic to Tertiary coal coalfi elds disrupting supply, the price rose steadily to as high as $164 in follows the southeast-to-northwest tectonic and physiographic mid-March. Prices began to decline toward the end of March grain of the province (Fig. 3). Currently, all coal mining is in the British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, British Columbia Geological Survey Information Circular 2021-02 &RDO5LYHU FRDOÀHOG 7X\D FRDOÀHOG *URXQGKRJ FRDOÀHOG 3HDFH5LYHU )RUW6W-RKQ FRDOÀHOGV :ROYHULQH 3HUU\&UHHN 6WHZDUW :LOORZ&UHHN %UXOH 7XPEOHU5LGJH 6PLWKHUV *UDKDP 3ULQFH5XSHUW ,VODQG 7HONZD FRDOÀHOGV FRDOÀHOG 3ULQFH*HRUJH %RZURQ +DLGD FRDOÀHOG *ZDLL &RDOÀHOG (ON5LYHU FRDOÀHOGV +DW&UHHN 5HYHOVWRNH )RUGLQJ5LYHU $FWLYHFRDOPLQH FRDOÀHOG *UHHQKLOOV 6XTXDVK .DPORRSV FRDOÀHOG /LQH&UHHN ; ,QDFWLYHFRDOPLQH 0HUULWW (ONYLHZ 4XLQVDP FRDOÀHOGV 9DQFRXYHU &RDOSRUW ; &UDQEURRN 6LPLONDPHHQ )HUQLH &URZVQHVW 9DQFRXYHU FRDOÀHOGV &RPR[ )ODWKHDG 5DLO FRDOÀHOG FRDOÀHOGV ,VODQG 1DQDLPR 9LFWRULD FRDOÀHOG .LORPHWUHV Fig. 3. Coalfi elds and operating coal mines in British Columbia. 100,000 70,000 90,000 60,000 880,000 550,000 770,000 660,000 440,000 550,000 Hectares 330,000 440,000 Hectares 30,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Fig. 4. New coal licence applications in hectares, 2010 to 2020, as of Fig. 5. Coal licences issued in hectares, 2010 to 2020, as of November November 12, 2020. This chart includes applications made in 2020 12, 2020. that were converted to licences before November 12. 2 British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, British Columbia Geological Survey Information Circular 2021-02 Rocky Mountain belt of eastern British Columbia. Coalfi elds Deposits of weak coking coal are recognized in the Boulder are also in the interior of the province and on Vancouver Island Creek Formation (Upper Cretaceous) but are not mined. and Haida Gwaii. Potentially mineable coal resources in northeastern British In southeastern British Columbia, deposits are in the Elk Columbia coalfi elds have been estimated at 4.9 billion tonnes. River, Crowsnest, and Flathead coalfi elds, which extend from In northwestern British Columbia, the Groundhog coalfi eld 2 the Canada-USA border to the northwest for 175 km along (Fig. 3) extends across an area of approximately 2300 km the Rocky Mountains (Figs. 3, 6). Economic coal seams are and hosts Canada’s only signifi cant anthracite deposits. The hosted by the Mist Mountain Formation of the Kootenay Group estimated potential of the greater Groundhog region is more (Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous; Fig. 7). Most of the known than 9 billion tonnes of semi-anthracite to meta-anthracite coal. resource is metallurgical (coking and PCI) coal, ranging mainly The coal is hosted by Jurassic to Cretaceous deltaic deposits in from high-volatile bituminous to low-volatile bituminous, the Bowser Lake Group. Coal is found in several other smaller with some semi-anthracite in southern Crowsnest coalfi eld. Mesozoic basins in the northwestern part of the province, Southeastern British Columbia coals are characterized by low including the Telkwa coalfi eld south of Smithers and the Tuya total sulphur contents. Potentially mineable coal resources River deposit (Fig. 3). are estimated at 8.0 billion tonnes. Provincial legislation In the southern interior, Paleocene to Eocene basins host enacted in 2011 prohibits subsurface resource exploration and coals in the Similkameen, Merritt, and Hat Creek coalfi elds. development in the Flathead River watershed (Fig. 6), so parts These coals range in rank from lignite to high-volatile of the Flathead and Crowsnest coalfi elds are excluded from bituminous and are generally low in sulphur. coal mining activity. On Vancouver Island, coal in the Nanaimo and Comox The northeastern British Columbia deposits are in the coalfi elds is hosted by several units in the Nanaimo Group Foothills and Plains coalfi elds, together known as the Peace (Upper Cretaceous). Coal ranks are generally high-volatile River coalfi elds. The Foothills coalfi eld extends for 400 km bituminous in rank; ash and sulphur contents vary. along the eastern fl ank of the Rocky Mountains (Figs. 3, 8). The coals are distributed through a stratigraphic interval of more Coal mining and exploration in 2020 than 3000 m, and are hosted by fi ve Lower Cretaceous units, the Coal production in in British Columbia in 2020 is forecast most important of which are the Gates Formation (Fort St. John to reach 25.1 million tonnes. Production from Teck Resources Group) and the Gething Formation (Bullhead Group; Fig. 9). Limited’s four mines in the southeast part of the province Coals in the Gething and Gates formations are bituminous in is forecast to be about 20.9 million tonnes. Conuma Coal rank, ranging from high to low volatile. Metallurgical (coking Resources Limited produced about 4.2 million tonnes from the and PCI) coals are predominant, and total sulphur contents are Perry Creek, Brule, and Willow Creek mines in the Peace River typically low.
Recommended publications
  • Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump

    Chemical and Physical Structural Studies on Two Inertinite-Rich Lump

    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INERTINITE-RICH LUMP COALS. Nandi Malumbazo A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philoso- phy in the School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering at the University of the Witwatersrand. Johannesburg, 2011 DECLARATION I, Nandi Malumbazo, declare that the thesis entitled: “CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TWO INER- TINITE-RICH LUMP COALS” is my own work and that all sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and ac- knowledged by means of references. Signature: ……………………………………………………………….. Date:………………………………………………………………………… Page i ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Two Highveld inertinite-rich lump coals were utilized as feed coal samples in order to study their physical, chemical structural and petrographic variations during heat treat- ment in a packed-bed reactor unit combustor. The two feed lump coals were selected as it is claimed that Coal B converts at a slower rate in a commercial coal conversion process when compared to Coal A. The reason for this requires detailed investigation. Chemical structural variations were determined by proximate and coal char CO2 reactiv- ity analysis. Physical structural variations were determined by FTIR, BET adsorption methods, XRD and 13C Solid state NMR analysis. Carbon particle type analysis was con- ducted to determine the petrographic constituents of the reactor generated samples, their maceral associations (microlithotype), and char morphology. This analysis was undertaken with the intention of tracking the carbon conversion and char formation and consumption behaviour of the two coal samples within the reactor. Proximate analysis revealed that Coal A released 10 % more of its volatile matter through the reactor compared to Coal B.
  • Coal Studies ELK VALLEY COALFIELD, NORTH HALF (825102, 07, 10, 11) by R

    Coal Studies ELK VALLEY COALFIELD, NORTH HALF (825102, 07, 10, 11) by R

    Coal Studies ELK VALLEY COALFIELD, NORTH HALF (825102, 07, 10, 11) By R. J. Morris and D. A. Grieve KEYWORDS: Coalgeology, Elk Valley coalfield, Mount the area is formed by Hmretta andBritt creeks, and is Veits, Mount Tuxford, HenretlaRidge, Bourgeau thrust, coal immediately north of the Fc'rdingRiver operations of Fording rank, Elk River syncline, Alexander Creek syncline. Coal Ltd.(Figure 4-1-1).The northernboundary is the British Columbia - Alberta border. The map area includes INTRODUCTION the upper Elk Valley and a portion of the upper Fording Detailed geological mapping and sampling of the north Valley. half of theElk Valley coalfieldbegan in 1986 and were Most of the area is Crown land and includes three c:od completed in 1987. The end poduct, a preliminary map at a properties. The most southerly comprises the north end ol'tbe scale of 1: IO OOO, will extend available map coverage in the Fording Coal Ltd. Fording River property. Adjacent to the coalfield north from the areas covered by Preliminary Maps north is theElk River property, in which Fording Coal 51 and 60 (Figure 4-l-l),which in turn expanded previous currently holds aSO-per-cent interest. Coal rights to the most coverage in the adjacent Crowsnest coalfield (Preliminary northerly property, formerly known as tlne Vincent option, Maps 24, 27,31 and 42). are reserved to the Crown Work in 1986 (Grieve, 1987) was mainly concentrated in Exploration history of the Weary Ridge - Bleasdell Creek the Weary Ridge ~ Bleasdell Creek area. Themore extensive area was summarized by Grieve (1987). Of the remailing 1987 field program was completed by R.J.
  • Proposal for Development of Dry Coking/Coal

    Proposal for Development of Dry Coking/Coal

    Development of Coking/Coal Gasification Concept to Use Indiana Coal for the Production of Metallurgical Coke, Liquid Transportation Fuels, Fertilizer, and Bulk Electric Power Phase II Final Report September 30, 2007 Submitted by Robert Kramer, Ph.D. Director, Energy Efficiency and Reliability Center Purdue University Calumet Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ………………………………………………..…………… 3 List of Figures …………………………………………………………………… 5 List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………. 6 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 7 Process Description ……………………………………………………………. 11 Importance to Indiana Coal Use ……………………………………………… 36 Relevance to Previous Studies ………………………………………………. 40 Policy, Scientific and Technical Barriers …………………………………….. 49 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………. 50 Appendix ………………………………………………………………………… 52 2 Executive Summary Coke is a solid carbon fuel and carbon source produced from coal that is used to melt and reduce iron ore. Although coke is an absolutely essential part of iron making and foundry processes, currently there is a shortfall of 5.5 million tons of coke per year in the United States. The shortfall has resulted in increased imports and drastic increases in coke prices and market volatility. For example, coke delivered FOB to a Chinese port in January 2004 was priced at $60/ton, but rose to $420/ton in March 2004 and in September 2004 was $220/ton. This makes clear the likelihood that prices will remain high. This effort that is the subject of this report has considered the suitability of and potential processes for using Indiana coal for the production of coke in a mine mouth or local coking/gasification-liquefaction process. Such processes involve multiple value streams that reduce technical and economic risk. Initial results indicate that it is possible to use blended coal with up to 40% Indiana coal in a non recovery coke oven to produce pyrolysis gas that can be selectively extracted and used for various purposes including the production of electricity and liquid transportation fuels and possibly fertilizer and hydrogen.
  • High Calorific Value Coal Turkish and Global Outlook

    High Calorific Value Coal Turkish and Global Outlook

    High calorific value coal Turkish and global outlook October 2014 2 Executive Summary Despite the fact that coal has notorious perception due to its impacts on the environment, it’s not possible to neglect its share in the global energy supply. Especially, in emerging markets with ever growing energy demand, cost and eligibility advantages bring coal into prominence. When a coal consumption analysis is conducted, it is evident that electricity and heat generation sector maintained its leadership with more than 3.8 billion tonnes in 2012. This situation can be seen in Turkey as well. Installed capacity of imported coal PPs in Turkish Uygar Yörük electricity market has passed 3.9 GW by the end Energy & Resources Industry Leader of the 2013. On account of increasing Turkish Partner electricity demand and economic advantages of imported coal, it wouldn’t be wrong to expect that imported coal PPs will show significant growth. In the first seven months of On the other side, all locations available to 2014, additional installed capacity of 950 MW imported coal power plants are already held connected to the grid. After the natural gas by investors and some of these projects will be investment boom in 2011, Turkish electricity naturally driven out of the competition. market has a new tendency to imported coal power plants. When global coal market is analysed, trends like China’s growing coal demand, shale gas Uncertainties related to natural gas power plants impact on coal prices and carbon policies and unexpected delays in lignite projects lead can be defined as major indicators that have investors to hard coal as a relatively more eligible determining role on coal pricing.
  • Memorial to Alexander Rankin Cameron 1927–2000 RUSSELL R

    Memorial to Alexander Rankin Cameron 1927–2000 RUSSELL R

    Memorial to Alexander Rankin Cameron 1927–2000 RUSSELL R. DUTCHER Box 128, Carbondale, Illinois 62903-0128 WILLIAM SPACKMAN 170 Rosin Court, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 As we move forward in our chosen professions, we become acquainted with many colleagues who become friends, professionally and oftentimes socially. By their very nature, geology and closely allied fields attract a large number of individuals who are in their chosen field because of the great satisfaction that stems from learning about Earth and its evolution. In turn, they enjoy imparting their knowledge to others—sometimes in a formal fashion through teaching and in publications, and sometimes through informal discussions, which may be spontaneous in origin. Every once in a while we meet a colleague who displays all of the traits to which everyone aspires. A human being that we just know makes life a little better for all of us, and by their very presence, makes the world a better place. Such a person was Alex Cameron. Alexander Rankin Cameron was born on January 24, 1927, in Toronto, Canada. At an early age Alex and his family moved to Cape Breton Island in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia. He received his bachelor of science degree from St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, Nova Scotia, in 1952. He spent the following summer at the Coal Research Laboratory of the Geological Survey of Canada in Sydney, Nova Scotia, under the guidance of Peter A. Hacque- bard. In the fall of 1952, he joined the staff of the Coal Research Section at Pennsylvania State University as a research assistant and graduate student in the Department of Geology and Geo- physics.
  • Conodont Biofacies in a Ramp to Basin Setting (Latest Devonian and Earliest Carboniferous) in the Rocky Mountains of Southernmost Canada and Northern Montana

    Conodont Biofacies in a Ramp to Basin Setting (Latest Devonian and Earliest Carboniferous) in the Rocky Mountains of Southernmost Canada and Northern Montana

    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Conodont biofacies in a ramp to basin setting (latest Devonian and earliest Carboniferous) in the Rocky Mountains of southernmost Canada and northern Montana by Lauret E. Savoy1 and Anita G. Harris 2 Open-File Report 93-184 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. \ Department of Geology and Geography, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA 01075 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 22092 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY AND DEPOSITIONAL SETTING 2 CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND BIOFACIES 8 Palliser Formation 8 Exshaw Formation 13 Banff Formation 13 Correlative units in the Lussier syncline 15 PALEOGEOGRAPfflC SETTING 17 CONCLUSION 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 23 REFERENCES CITED 24 APPENDIX 1 38 FIGURES 1. Index map of sections examined and major structural features of the thrust and fold belt 3 2. Correlation chart of Upper Devonian and Lower Mississippian stratigraphic units. 4 3. Selected microfacies of the Palliser Formation. 5 4. Type section of Exshaw Formation, Jura Creek. 6 5. Lower part of Banff Formation, North Lost Creek. 7 6. Conodont distribution in Palliser and Exshaw formations, Inverted Ridge. 9 7. Conodont distribution in upper Palliser and lower Banff formations, Crowsnest Pass. 11 8. Conodont distribution in upper Palliser, Exshaw, and lower Banff formations, composite Jura Creek - Mount Buller section. 12 9.
  • Alaska's High-Rank Coals

    Alaska's High-Rank Coals

    ALASKA'S HIGH-RANK COALS A summary of high-rank coal resources in Alaska and their potential for mining and development. First Edition 1990 Revised Edition 1993 Department ofNatura1 Resources DMSION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Fairbanks, Alaska ! Cover photo: North linrb of Wishbone Hill syncline, Mafanusku Valley. (Seefig. 8, p. 7.) STATEOFALASKA Walter J. Hickel, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Glenn A. Olds, Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Thomas E. Smith, State Geologist Address mail orders to the Fairbanks office. DGGS publications may be inspected at the following locations. Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3645 Department of Natural Resources Public Information Center 3601 C Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 This publication, produced and released by the Division of Geological &Geophysical Surveys, and printed in Delta Junction, Alaska, by Dragon Press at a cost of $2.66 per copy. Publication is required by Alaska Statute 41, "to determine the potential of Alaskan land forproductionofrnetals, minerals, fuels, and geothermal resources; the location and supplies of groundwater and construction materials; the potential geologic hazards to buildings, roads, bridges, and other installations and structures; and shall conduct such other surveys and investigations as will advance knowledge of the geology of Alaska." FOREWORD Although current coal production is limited to subbituminous coals, Alaska produced high rank coals from the MatanuskaJield until 1968. Plans are again under wayfor production from the MatanuskaJield. Deadfall syncline coal, being in close proximity to the Bering Sea, is anofher candidatefor development and is receiving renewed attention. For example, seam K3 of thisfield is ofhigh voIatile A bituminous rank and has a maximum thickness of 17feet, with an average ash content of 9percentand over 10feet of this seam averages less than 4percent ash.
  • The Letters F and T Refer to Figures Or Tables Respectively

    The Letters F and T Refer to Figures Or Tables Respectively

    INDEX The letters f and t refer to figures or tables respectively "A" Marker, 312f, 313f Amherstberg Formation, 664f, 728f, 733,736f, Ashville Formation, 368f, 397, 400f, 412, 416, Abitibi River, 680,683, 706 741f, 765, 796 685 Acadian Orogeny, 686, 725, 727, 727f, 728, Amica-Bear Rock Formation, 544 Asiak Thrust Belt, 60, 82f 767, 771, 807 Amisk lowlands, 604 Askin Group, 259f Active Formation, 128f, 132f, 133, 139, 140f, ammolite see aragonite Assiniboia valley system, 393 145 Amsden Group, 244 Assiniboine Member, 412, 418 Adam Creek, Ont., 693,705f Amundsen Basin, 60, 69, 70f Assiniboine River, 44, 609, 637 Adam Till, 690f, 691, 6911,693 Amundsen Gulf, 476, 477, 478 Athabasca, Alta., 17,18,20f, 387,442,551,552 Adanac Mines, 339 ancestral North America miogeocline, 259f Athabasca Basin, 70f, 494 Adel Mountains, 415 Ancient Innuitian Margin, 51 Athabasca mobile zone see Athabasca Adel Mountains Volcanics, 455 Ancient Wall Complex, 184 polymetamorphic terrane Adirondack Dome, 714, 765 Anderdon Formation, 736f Athabasca oil sands see also oil and gas fields, Adirondack Inlier, 711 Anderdon Member, 664f 19, 21, 22, 386, 392, 507, 553, 606, 607 Adirondack Mountains, 719, 729,743 Anderson Basin, 50f, 52f, 359f, 360, 374, 381, Athabasca Plain, 617f Aftonian Interglacial, 773 382, 398, 399, 400, 401, 417, 477f, 478 Athabasca polymetamorphic terrane, 70f, Aguathuna Formation, 735f, 738f, 743 Anderson Member, 765 71-72,73 Aida Formation, 84,104, 614 Anderson Plain, 38, 106, 116, 122, 146, 325, Athabasca River, 15, 20f, 35, 43, 273f, 287f, Aklak
  • Bedrock Geology of Alberta

    Bedrock Geology of Alberta

    Alberta Geological Survey Map 600 Legend Bedrock Geology of Alberta Southwestern Plains Southeastern Plains Central Plains Northwestern Plains Northeastern Plains NEOGENE (± PALEOGENE) NEOGENE ND DEL BONITA GRAVELS: pebble gravel with some cobbles; minor thin beds and lenses NH HAND HILLS FORMATION: gravel and sand, locally cemented into conglomerate; gravel of sand; pebbles consist primarily of quartzite and argillite with minor amounts of sandstone, composed of mainly quartzite and sandstone with minor amounts of chert, arkose, and coal; fluvial amygdaloidal basalt, and diabase; age poorly constrained; fluvial PALEOGENE PALEOGENE PALEOGENE (± NEOGENE) PALEOGENE (± NEOGENE) UPLAND GRAVEL: gravel composed of mainly white quartzite cobbles and pebbles with lesser amounts of UPLAND GRAVEL: gravel capping the Clear Hills, Halverson Ridge, and Caribou Mountains; predominantly .C CYPRESS HILLS FORMATION: gravel and sand, locally cemented to conglomerate; mainly quartzite .G .G and sandstone clasts with minor chert and quartz component; fluvial black chert pebbles; sand matrix; minor thin beds and lenses of sand; includes gravel in the Swan Hills area; white quartzite cobbles and pebbles with lesser amounts of black chert pebbles; quartzite boulders occur in the age poorly constrained; fluvial Clear Hills and Halverson Ridge gravels; sand matrix; ages poorly constrained; extents poorly defined; fluvial .PH PORCUPINE HILLS FORMATION: olive-brown mudstone interbedded with fine- to coarse-grained, .R RAVENSCRAG FORMATION: grey to buff mudstone
  • Chemical Analyses and Physical Properties of 12 Coal Samples from the Pocahontas Field, Tazewell County, Virginia, and Mcdowell County, West Virginia

    Chemical Analyses and Physical Properties of 12 Coal Samples from the Pocahontas Field, Tazewell County, Virginia, and Mcdowell County, West Virginia

    Chemical Analyses and Physical Properties of 12 Coal Samples from the Pocahontas Field, Tazewell County, Virginia, and McDowell County, West Virginia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1528 Chemical Analyses and Physical Properties of 12 Coal Samples from the Pocahontas Field, Tazewell County, Virginia, and McDowell County, West Virginia By VIRGIL A. TRENT, JACK H. MEDLIN, S. LYNN COLEMAN, and RONALD W. STANTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1528 A discussion of the metamorphic rank, major and minor element content, and physical properties of 12 coal samples from the Pocahontas coal field UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chemical analyses and physical properties of 12 coal samples from the Pocahontas field, Tazewell County, Virginia, and McDowell County, West Virginia. (Geological Survey bulletin ; 1528) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1528 1. Coal-Virginia-Tazewell County-Analysis. 2. Coal-West Virginia-McDowell County­ Analysis. I. Trent, Virgil A. II. Series. QE75.B9 vo. 1528 [TP326.U5] 557.3 81-607871 [662.6'224'09755763] AACR2 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page A bs tract_________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction_____________________________________________________________________________
  • Stratigraphy, Paleotectonics and Paleoenvironments of the Morrison Formation in the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming and Montana Dibakar Goswami Iowa State University

    Stratigraphy, Paleotectonics and Paleoenvironments of the Morrison Formation in the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming and Montana Dibakar Goswami Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1993 Stratigraphy, paleotectonics and paleoenvironments of the Morrison Formation in the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming and Montana Dibakar Goswami Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Goswami, Dibakar, "Stratigraphy, paleotectonics and paleoenvironments of the Morrison Formation in the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming and Montana " (1993). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 10434. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10434 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afiect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
  • Oil and Gas Resource Potential of the Kootenay Area of British Columbia

    Oil and Gas Resource Potential of the Kootenay Area of British Columbia

    . OIL AND GAS RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE KOOTENAY AREA OF BRITISH COLUMBIA by Peter Hannigan, P.J. Lee, K.G. Osadetz and K. Olsen-Heise Petroleum Resources Subdivision Institute of Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology Geological Survey of Canada 3303 - 33 Street N.W. Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7 April, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND PLAY PARAMETERS 7 Waterton Colorado Foothills Gas Play 7 Waterton Mannville Foothills Gas Play 8 Waterton Mannville Foothills Oil Play 9 Waterton Rundle/Wabamun Foothills Gas Play 9 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Gas Play 10 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Oil Play 12 MacDonald Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 12 Fernie - Elk Valley Mesozoic Structural Gas Play 14 Fernie - Elk Valley Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 15 Rocky Mountain Trench Cenozoic Structural Gas Play 16 Belt - Purcell Structural Oil and Gas Play 17 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Oil Play 17 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Gas Play 19 Belt - Purcell Conceptual Structural Oil Play 19 Belt - Purcell Conceptual Structural Gas Play 19 Belt - Purcell Speculative Structural Gas Play 20 Belt - Purcell Speculative Structural Oil Play 20 ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE 20 RESOURCE APPRAISAL 21 Waterton Colorado Foothills Gas Play 21 Waterton Mannville Foothills Gas Play 22 Waterton Mannville Foothills Oil Play 22 Waterton Rundle/Wabamun Foothills Gas Play 22 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Gas Play 23 Kishenehn Tertiary Graben Oil Play 23 MacDonald Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 23 Fernie - Elk Valley Mesozoic Structural Gas Play 23 Fernie - Elk Valley Paleozoic Structural Gas Play 24 Rocky Mountain Trench Cenozoic Structural Gas Play 24 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Oil Play 24 Belt - Purcell Immature Structural Gas Play 25 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 25 REFERENCES 28 APPENDIX 1: PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS AND RISK FACTORS 44 APPENDIX 2: STATISTICAL OUTPUT 61 FIGURE CAPTIONS 160 SUMMARY There are sixteen exploration hydrocarbon plays identified in the Kootenay area of southeastern British Columbia.