DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground-Water Flow and Simulated Effects of Development in Paradise Valley, a Basin Tributary to the Humboldt River in Humboldt County, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground-Water Flow and Simulated Effects of Development in Paradise Valley, a Basin Tributary to the Humboldt River in Humboldt County, Nevada GROUND-WATER FLOW AND SIMULATED EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT IN PARADISE VALLEY, A BASIN TRIBUTARY TO THE HUMBOLDT RIVER IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA ~1 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1409-F AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single all of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superin­ ANCHORAGE, Alaska 4230 University Dr., Rm. 101 tendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from LAKEWOOD, Colorado Federal Center, Bldg. 810 U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center MENLO PARK, California Bldg. 3, Rm. 3128, 345 Mid- Denver, CO 80225 dlefield Rd. Subscriptions to periodicals (Earthquakes & Volcanoes and RESTON, Virginia National Center, Rm. IC402, 12201 Preliminary Determination of Epicenters) can be obtained ONLY Sunrise Valley Dr. from the SALT LAKE CITY, Utah Federal Bldg., Rm. 8105, 125 Superintendent of Documents South State St. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 SPOKANE, Washington U.S. Post Office Bldg., Rm. 135, W. 904 Riverside Ave. (Check or money order must be payable to Superintendent of Documents.) WASHINGTON, D.C. Main Interior Bldg., Rm. 2650, 18th and C Sts., NW. Maps Maps Only For maps, address mail orders to Maps may be purchased over the counter at the U.S. Geologi­ U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution cal Survey offices: Box 25286, BIdg. 810, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 FAIRBANKS, Alaska New Federal Building, 101 Twelfth Ave. Residents of Alaska may order maps from ROLLA, Missouri 1400 Independence Rd U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Science Information Center 101 Twelfth Ave., Box 12 Fairbanks. AK 99701 STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Mississippi Bldg. 3101 Ground-Water Flow and Simulated Effects of Development in Paradise Valley, A BasinTributary to the Humboldt River in Humboldt County, Nevada By DAVID E. PRUDIC and MARC E. HERMAN REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS GREAT BASIN, NEVADA-UTAH U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1409-F UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade names and trademarks in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Prudic, David E. Ground-water flow and simulated effects of development in Paradise Valley, a basin tributary to the Humboldt River in Humboldt County, Nevada / by David E. Prudic and Marc E. Herman. p. cm. (Regional aquifer system analysis Great Basin, Nevada-Utah) (United States Geological Survey professional paper: 1409-F) Includes bibliographic references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16: 1409-F 1. Groundwater flow Nevada Paradise Valley. I. Herman, Marc E. n. Title. HI. Series. IV. Series: U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1409-F. GB1197.7.P78 1995 95-35543 551.49'09793'54-dc20 CIP For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 FOREWORD THE REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS PROGRAM The Regional Aquifer-System Analysis (RASA) Program was started in 1978 following a congressional mandate to develop quantitative appraisals of the major ground-water systems of the United States. The RASA Program represents a systematic effort to study a number of the Nation's most important aquifer systems, which in aggregate underlie much of the country and which represent an important component of the Nation's total water supply. In general, the boundaries of these studies are identified by the hydrologic extent of each system and accordingly transcend the political subdivisions to which investigations have often arbitrarily been limited in the past. The broad objective for each study is to assemble geologic, hydrologic, and geochemical information, to analyze and develop an understanding of the system, and to develop predictive capabilities that will contribute to the effective management of the system. The use of computer simulation is an important element of the RASA studies, both to develop an understanding of the natural, undisturbed hydrologic system and the changes brought about in it by human activities, and to provide a means of predicting the regional effects of future pumping or other stresses. The final interpretive results of the RASA Program are presented in a series of U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers that describe the geology, hydrology, and geochemistry of each regional aquifer system. Each study within the RASA Program is assigned a single Professional Paper number, and where the volume of interpretive material warrants, separate topical chapters that consider the principal elements of the investigation may be published. The series of RASA interpretive reports begins with Professional Paper 1400 and thereafter will continue in numerical sequence as the interpre­ tive products of subsequent studies become available. Gordon P. Eaton Director CONTENTS Page Page iiUDHd^l*Ahatrart __ - __ __ _______- ____________________ j_TTI j_ Ground-water discharge F26 Introduction F2 Evapotranspiration F27 Purpose and scope F3 Subsurface outflow to Humboldt River Valley - F27 Location and general features of study area F3 Subsurface outflow along Humboldt River F27 Previous investigations F5 Ground-water pumpage F27 Inventory of wells and springs F5 Simulation of ground-water flow F29 Acknowledgments F5 Digital computer model F32 Hydrogeologic setting F5 General features of model F32 General character of hydrogeologic units F5 Stream leakage F35 Geologic history during late Tertiary and Quaternary Evapotranspiration F36 Initial conditions and hydraulic properties F38 Hydrologic setting F9 Results of simulation F38 Climate ... .... .- .- ..- .- F9 Predevelopment conditions F38 Surface water F 1 1 Calibration of steady-state simulations F39 Ground water - F13 Simulated ground-water flow F43 Basin-fill aquifer F14 Effects of development, 1948 through 1982 F51 Areal extent and thickness F14 Selection of stress periods for simulation F51 Hydraulic properties F17 Calibration of transient simulations F54 Hydraulic conductivity F19 Aquifer response F56 Storage coefficient F21 Effects of reduced recharge F61 Ground water in storage F22 Simulated response to selected development Ground-water recharge F22 conditions F64 Precipitation on valley floor F22 Selection of scenarios F66 Subsurface inflow from adjacent mountains F25 Discussion of results F67 Infiltration of water from streams F25 Summary and conclusions F86 Infiltration of water from Humboldt River F26 CltGCl ~" ----------------- -- - « -- , ,-_.--- _p yy Subsurface inflow along Humboldt River F26 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map showing location of Paradise Valley study area relative to Humboldt River drainage area and Great Basin studv area ______________________________________________________________ F2 2. Map showing general features, stream-gaging stations, and precipitation stations in and adjacent to Paradise Valley, Humboldt County, Nevada - - F4 3. Diagram showing numbering system for wells and springs in Nevada F6 4. Map showing distribution of hydrogeologic units in Paradise Valley, Humboldt County, Nevada F10 5 -7. Graphs showing: 5. Monthly distribution of average annual precipitation at Paradise Valley and near Winnemucca, Nevada Fll 6. Average monthly streamflows as percentage of average annual streamflow for Martin Creek and Little Humboldt River where they enter Paradise Valley and for Humboldt River at Comus, Nevada F12 7. Annual streamflow and cumulative departure from average annual streamflow for Martin Creek where it enters Paradise Valley, Humboldt County, Nevada, water years 1923-82 F13 8-12. Maps showing: 8. Depth to ground water prior to large quantities of pumpage, Paradise Valley, Humboldt County, Nevada F15 9. Ground-water levels, Paradise Valley, Humboldt County, Nevada, spring 1968 F16 10. Thickness of basin fill in Paradise Valley, Humboldt Valley, Nevada F18 CONTENTS 11. Distribution of hydraulic conductivity in upper 600 feet of basin fill as determined from specific-capacity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Species Management Plan for the Upper Humboldt River Drainage Basin
    STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN Prepared by John Elliott SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2004 LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN SUBMITTED BY: _______________________________________ __________ John Elliott, Supervising Fisheries Biologist Date Nevada Department of Wildlife, Eastern Region APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Richard L. Haskins II, Fisheries Bureau Chief Date Nevada Department of Wildlife _______________________________________ __________ Kenneth E. Mayer, Director Date Nevada Department of Wildlife REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Robert Williams, Field Supervisor Date Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service _______________________________________ __________ Ron Wenker, State Director Date U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management _______________________________________ __________ Edward C. Monnig, Forest Supervisor Date Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest U.S.D.A. Forest Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………..1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….…2 AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES……………………………………………………………….…4 CURRENT STATUS……………………………………………………………………………..6 RECOVERY OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………………19 RECOVERY ACTIONS…………………………………………………………………………21 RECOVERY ACTION PRIORITIES BY SUBBASIN………………………………………….33 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE……………………………………………………………..47
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Department of Wildlife Statewide Fisheries Management
    NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F-20-50 2014 CHIMNEY RESERVOIR WESTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION JOB PROGRESS REPORT Table of Contents Contents Page SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 1 PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................... 2 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL MANAGEMENT REVIEW ............................................................................. 9 STUDY REVIEW ........................................................................................................... 10 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 10 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION JOB PROGRESS REPORT List of Tables Number Title Page 1 Chimney Reservoir Oppurtunistic Angler Survey 2014……………………..3 2 Chimney Reservoir Angler Questionnaire Results 2009-2013 ................... 4 3 Chimney Reservoir Stocking History 2010-2014 ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Paiute of California, Idaho, Nevada and Oregon
    טקוּפה http://family.lametayel.co.il/%D7%9E%D7%A1%D7%9F+%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A0%D7 %A1%D7%99%D7%A1%D7%A7%D7%95+%D7%9C%D7%9C%D7%90%D7%A1+%D7%9 5%D7%92%D7%90%D7%A1 تاكوبا Τακόπα The self-sacrifice on the tree came to them from a white-bearded god who visited them 2,000 years ago. He is called different names by different tribes: Tah-comah, Kate-Zahi, Tacopa, Nana-bush, Naapi, Kul-kul, Deganaweda, Ee-see-cotl, Hurukan, Waicomah, and Itzamatul. Some of these names can be translated to: the Pale Prophet, the bearded god, the Healer, the Lord of Water and Wind, and so forth. http://www.spiritualjourneys.com/article/diary-entry-a-gift-from-an-indian-spirit/ Chief Tecopa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Tecopa Chief Tecopa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Chief Tecopa (c.1815–1904) was a Native American leader, his name means wildcat. [1] Chief Tecopa was a leader of the Southern Nevada tribe of the Paiute in the Ash Meadows and Pahrump areas. In the 1840s Tecopa and his warriors engaged the expedition of Kit Carson and John C. Fremont in a three-day battle at Resting Springs.[2] Later on in life Tecopa tried to maintain peaceful relations with the white settlers to the region and was known as a peacemaker. [3] Tecopa usually wore a bright red band suit with gold braid and a silk top hat. Whenever these clothes wore out they were replaced by the local white miners out of gratitude for Tecopa's help in maintaining peaceful relations with the Paiute.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Streamflow on the Humboldt River Between Elko and Imlay, Nevada, 1950–99
    Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Trends in Streamflow on the Humboldt River between Elko and Imlay, Nevada, 1950–99 Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey FRONT COVER: Photographs of Humboldt River at Blossom bridge near Valmy, Nevada, upstream of the streamflow gage at Comus. Top photograph is from the bridge looking downstream on June 9, 1999 during high flow. Bottom photograph is from the bridge looking downstream on October 18, 2001 during a period of no flow. Photographs taken by D.E. Prudic. Trends in Streamflow on the Humboldt River between Elko and Imlay, Nevada, 1950–99 By David E. Prudic, Richard G. Niswonger, and Russell W. Plume Prepared in cooperation with the NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Carson City, Nevada: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt River Chronology Part III—Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
    Humboldt River Chronology Part III—Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries 1900 (February 8) It soon became evident that the plea presented in the Reese River Reveille (Austin) in September 1898 to eliminate the carp from the Humboldt River had met with little success. The Silver State (Winnemucca) reported in a very long article that there was no apparent use for carp: “Before the carp were placed in the river, the Humboldt was one of the best trout streams in the State; now the carp have overstocked the river, taken all the feed and destroyed the spawn of the other fish, so today you can catch nothing but carp…”1 1900 (February 27) In an early reference to the eventual construction of Rye Patch Reservoir, the Tuscarora Times-Review reported that “The ranchers in the vicinity of Lovelocks [Lovelock] have spent over $100,000 in litigation and this has not settled the water question and has not added a drop to the present supply. This [same] sum spent in storage reservoirs would have settled the water question in short order, but possibly the ranchers didn’t think of so simple a scheme as that.”2 1900 It was around this time that the annual cheatgrass began to replace the depleted climax perennial grass-forb understory and out-compete sagebrush that had been thinned or eliminated by range wildfires or excessive grazing by cattle and sheep throughout the Humboldt River Basin. This cheatgrass “invasion” would have extensive effects on trends in future wildfires as well as the habitats of animal species. For example, sharp-tail grouse and sage
    [Show full text]
  • Great Basin Region
    Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Ground-Water Resources­ Great Basin Region GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 813-G NEVADA r~ I I SummaryAppraisals of the Nation's GroundWater Resources-Great Basin Region By THOMAS E. EAKIN, DON PRICE, and J. R. HARRILL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 813-G A regional appraisal and discussion of planning the future ground-water development in a region characterized by a semiarid climate and closed-basin drainage UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director First printing 1976 Second printing 1977 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Eakin, Thomas Emery, 1914- Summary appraisals of the Nation's ground-water resources-Great Basin region. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-G Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:813-G 1. Water, Underground-Great Basin. 2. Water resources development-Great Basin. I. Price, Don, 1929- joint author. II. Harrill, J. R., joint author. III. Title. IV. Series·: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-G. GB1027.G73E2 333.9'104'0979 76-608224 For sale by the Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, VA 22202 CONTENTS Page Page System of measurement units ........................................................... IV Information to plan ground-water development. ............................ GIS Abstract .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. G 1 Options for ground-water development..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rosa Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service 2011
    Travel Analysis Report For Santa Rosa Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service 2011 Santa Rosa Ranger District Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Humboldt County, NV Santa Rosa Ranger District Travel Analysis 2007 Location: Humboldt County, Nevada Lead agency: USDA Forest Service Intermountain Region (R4) Humboldt -Toiyabe National Forest Responsible official: Jose Noriega, District Ranger Santa Rosa Ranger District 1200 Winnemucca Boulevard East Winnemucca, NV 89445 775-623-5025 ex 115 For further information: Kevin Wilmot, RELM Staff Officer, Forest Engineer Humboldt- Toiyabe National Forest Supervisor’s Office 1200 Franklin Way Sparks, NV 89431 775-352-1272 Notice: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice)
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Results of Hydrogeologic Investigations Humboldt River
    Preliminary Results of Hydrogeologic Investigations in the Valley of the Humboldt River Near Winnemucca, Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1754 Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Preliminary Results of Hydrogeologic Investigations in the Valley of the Humboldt River Near Winnemucca, Nevada By PHILIP COHEN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1754 Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERFOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan. Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library cards for this publication appear after page 59 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract _________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Location and general features of the area.________________________ 2 Scope of the investigation and purpose and scope of the report._____ 3 Previous work_____________________ __________________________ 4 Acknowledgments _____________________________________________ 4 Numbering system of wells and test borings ______________________ 5 Methods of investigation. __________________________________________ 5 Field program.______________________________________________ 5 Laboratory studies____________________________________________ 7 Geology._______----_-----_--_-___-__________________________-____
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt River Chronology Part II – Pre-Twentieth Century
    Humboldt River Chronology Part II – Pre-Twentieth Century 2,000,000 Years Ago to 10,000 Years Ago (Pleistocene Epoch) The prehistory of the Humboldt River Basin is marked by profound changes in climate and hydrology. Ancient lake shorelines have provided invaluable information into the scope of these changes. For example, shoreline altitudes of a number of pluvial lakes (e.g., ancient Lake Lahontan) in the northern and western Great Basin1 have indicated successively smaller lakes from the Early to the Late Pleistocene Epoch.2 This decrease in lake size suggests a long-term drying tend in the region’s climate over the last two million years. Calculations based on differences in lake areas suggest that the highest levels of these pluvial lakes would have required a regional effective moisture of up to three times greater than the effective moisture level estimated to have existed in the Late Pleistocene. These previously unknown peak lake elevations (highstands) reflect significant changes in climate, tectonics and/or drainage basin configurations that could have facilitated the migration of aquatic species throughout the Great Basin.3 Lake Lahontan’s Early Pleistocene surface level (4,590 feet MSL) was more recently estimated to have been over 200 feet above its Late Pleistocene shoreline (4,380 feet MSL), a surface elevation widely recognized as this lake’s highstand. At this higher elevation, the Early Pleistocene Lake Lahontan would have extended its reach further up the Humboldt River from the Late Pleistocene highstand, which had been estimated to have reached just above Red House (about five miles above Comus).
    [Show full text]
  • BIG GAME STATUS BOOK 2020 COMPLETE(1).Pdf
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Mike Scott, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Specialist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Photo courtesy of Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2019-2020 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT RECOVERY PLAN Current Status: Lahontan Cutthroat Trout (LCT) Are Listed As Threatened
    Recovery Plan for the Lahontan Cutthroat Trout January 1995 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1 Portland, Oregon LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT (Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by Patrick D. Coffin William F. Cowan for Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: service Date: As the Nation ‘s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofourlandand water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resourcesand worksto assure that theirdevelopment is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. A DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Water Plan Framework
    June 2017 DRAFT Water Plan Framework Humboldt County, Nevada Prepared by: Prepared for: Resource Concepts, Inc. Humboldt County Board 340 N. Minnesota Street of Commissioners th Carson City, NV 89703 50 West 5 Street 775 / 883-1600 Winnemucca, NV 89445 [This page intentionally left blank.] DRAFT Water Plan for Humboldt County June 2017 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Preliminary Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Statutory Authority and Existing Plans .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Organization .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Water Plan Process ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Water Resource Background and Assessment................................................................................. 5 2.1 Setting ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]