DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT Water Plan Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT Water Plan Framework June 2017 DRAFT Water Plan Framework Humboldt County, Nevada Prepared by: Prepared for: Resource Concepts, Inc. Humboldt County Board 340 N. Minnesota Street of Commissioners th Carson City, NV 89703 50 West 5 Street 775 / 883-1600 Winnemucca, NV 89445 [This page intentionally left blank.] DRAFT Water Plan for Humboldt County June 2017 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Preliminary Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Statutory Authority and Existing Plans .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Organization .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Water Plan Process ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Water Resource Background and Assessment................................................................................. 5 2.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Topography and Geology ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Climate and Precipitation ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4 Land Management ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.5 Infrastructure and Public Services ................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Water Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Surface Water ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 2.2.3 Reuse/Recycling/ Conservation ....................................................................................................................... 32 3.0 Water Uses and Forecasts ..................................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Economy .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 3.2 Population Trends ................................................................................................................................................. 34 3.3 Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................ 36 3.3.1 Custom and Culture of Humboldt County Agriculture. 39 3.4 Mining and Milling ................................................................................................................................................. 41 3.5 Municipal and Domestic ...................................................................................................................................... 42 3.6 Industry ..................................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.7 Recreation/Tourism ............................................................................................................................................. 45 3.8 Wildlife ....................................................................................................................................................................... 45 4.0 Water Resource Planning and Management ................................................................................... 47 4.1 Stakeholders and Agencies ................................................................................................................................ 47 4.2 Existing Management Plans .............................................................................................................................. 47 4.3 Issues and Opportunities .................................................................................................................................... 47 4.3.1 Water Supply and Allocation ............................................................................................................................ 48 4.3.2 Economic Development ........................................................................................................................................ 48 4.3.4 Hazard Reduction ........................................................................................................................................... 48 4.3.5 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................... 48 4.3.6 Education and Communication ................................................................................................................. 49 4.3.7 Financial Resources ....................................................................................................................................... 49 4.4 Legal Issues Concerning Interbasin Transfer of Water 50 4.4.1 Transfers Within Humboldt County 50 4.4.2 Transfers Outside of Humboldt County 50 5.0 County Water Planning Alternatives Approach, Policies, and Implementation ............... 58 5.1 Alternative Planning Approaches, and Preferred Approach ............................................................... 58 5.2 Water Plan Implementation .............................................................................................................................. 62 5.3 Water Planning Considerations and Opportunities ................................................................................ 63 Page i DRAFT Water Plan for Humboldt County June 2017 5.4 Water Plan Completition 64 6.0 References ................................................................................................................................................... 66 List of Tables (Pages are not correct for tables, figures, etc. - TL Table 2-1. Average Annual Precipitation and Temperature Across Humboldt County ............................ 9 Table 2-2. Land Management in Humboldt County ............................................................................................... 12 Table 2-3. Humboldt County Hydrographic Regions ............................................................................................. 14 Table 2-4. Surface Water Bodies with Water Quality Not Supporting Beneficial Use Standards ....... 17 Table 2-5. Summary of Surface Water Rights (AFA) in Humboldt County Basins .................................... 18 Table 2-6. Summary of Groundwater Rights (AFA) in Humboldt County, Supplementally Adjusted ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 Table 2-7. Groundwater Manner of Use for Hydrographic Basins in Humboldt County ........................ 31 Table 3-1. Population in Humboldt County and Communities .......................................................................... 35 Table 3-2. Comparison of Population Projections in Humboldt County. ...................................................... 37 Table 3-3. Summary of Agriculture in Humboldt County in 2012 ................................................................... 37 Table 3-4. Water demand associated with expansion in irrigated crop area in Humboldt County, based on the total amount identified as being suitable for disposal by the BLM. ............................. 39 Table 3-5. Public Water Supply Systems and Population Served. .................................................................... 45 Table 3-6. Population and Domestic and Municipal Water Use Projections ............................................... 46 Table 4-1. Summary of Potential Water Stakeholders in Humboldt County ............................................... 54 Table 4-2. Existing Land and Resource Management Plans in Humboldt County ..................................... 55 Table 4-3. Issues and Opportunities to Consider in Water Planning .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana
    Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana Joseph E. Worthington Idaho Geological Survey University of Idaho Technical Report 07-3 Moscow, Idaho ISBN 1-55765-515-4 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Molybdenum Vein Deposits ...................................................................... 2 Tertiary Molybdenum Deposits ................................................................. 2 Little Falls—1 ............................................................................. 3 CUMO—2 .................................................................................. 3 Red Mountain Prospect—45 ...................................................... 3 Rocky Bar District—43 .............................................................. 3 West Eight Mile—37 .................................................................. 3 Devil’s Creek Prospect—46 ....................................................... 3 Walton—8 .................................................................................. 4 Ima—3 ........................................................................................ 4 Liver Peak (a.k.a. Goat Creek)—4 ............................................. 4 Bald Butte—5 ............................................................................. 5 Big Ben—6 ................................................................................. 6 Emigrant Gulch—7 ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MULE DEER Unit 032
    Nevada Hunter Information Sheet MULE DEER Unit 032 LOCATION: Unit 032 is located northwest of the town of Winnemucca. The unit is bounded on the north by the Oregon state line, on the east by State Route 140/291, on the south by Unit 034 and on the west by the Sheldon NWR boundary. ELEVATION: The elevations range from a high of 9,458 feet at Duffer Peak in the Pine Forest Range to 4,000 feet along the Black Rock Desert or the base of the Pine Forest Range. TERRAIN: The Pine Forest Range runs north and south with steep canyons draining into the flats. The valley floors have some agricultural development. VEGETATION: The majority of the basins and slopes up to 6,500-foot elevation. Above this elevation, sites are typically characterized by aspens in the drainages, mahogany groves and dense stands of brush and grass. There are some limber pine stands at the higher elevations around Duffer Peak. LAND STATUS: Approximately 85% of the unit is public-owned. Private land is mostly associated with agriculture or mining. HUNTER ACCESS: From Winnemucca drive north on Highway 95 and west on Highway 140. Primary and secondary road access is relatively good. Four-wheel drive (high clearance) vehicles are recommended to access most of the unit for hunting purposes. The Blue Lakes Wilderness Study Area covers 24,000 acres the Duffer Peak area and is closed to all motorized travel. Access on some roads may be restricted by private landowners in the Leonard Creek drainage. Ask permission before accessing private parcels in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Josie Pearl, Prospector on Nevada's Black Rock Desert
    JUNE, 1962 40c • • • • . Author's car crossing the playa of Black Rock Desert in northwestern Nevada. On Black Rock Desert Trails When Dora Tucker and Nell Murbarger first began exploring the Black Rock country in northwestern Nevada they did not realize what a high, wide and wild country it was. On the Black Rock a hundred miles doesn't mean a thing. In the 10,000 square miles of this desert wasteland there isn't a foot of pavement nor a mile of railroad— neither gasoline station nor postoffice. Antelopes out-number human beings fifty to one. There's plenty of room here for exploring. By NELL MURBARGER Photographs by the author Map by Norton Allen S AN illustration of what the want to! Ain't nothin' there!" is known as "the Black Rock country," Black Rock country affords Thanking him, we accepted his re- the desert from which it derives its in the way of variety and con- port as a favorable omen and headed name actually is a stark white alkali trast, we made a J 50-mile loop trip out into the desert. Almost invariably playa, averaging a dozen miles in out of Gerlach last June. Our previous we find our best prowling in places width and stretching for 100 miles exploring of the region had been mostly where folks have told us there "ain't from Gerlach to Kings River. Merging in the northern and eastern sections, nothin'." imperceptibly with the Black Rock on so we hadn't the slightest idea of what Rising precipitously from the dead the southwest is the section known as we might find in the southern part.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Land-Use Plan
    B2H Final EIS and Proposed LUP Amendments Appendix D—Supporting Data for Vegetation Resources Appendix D SUPPORTING DATA FOR VEGETATION RESOURCES D . 1 N O X I O U S W EEDS Noxious weeds are a subset of aggressive, non-native invasive plants that have been officially designated as detrimental to public health, agriculture, recreation, wildlife, or property. Noxious weeds include all species listed on state and county noxious weed lists. Table D-1 identifies the noxious weeds potentially occurring in the vegetation resources study corridor (0.5 mile on either side of the centerline for all alternative routes). Table D-1. State- and County-Designated Noxious Weeds with Potential to Occur Oregon Scientific Name Common Name Idaho State List State List County List Peganum harmala African rue N/A A, T N/A Armenian Rubus armeniacus N/A B N/A blackberry Hedera hibernica Atlantic Ivy N/A B N/A Austrian peaweed Sphaerophysa salsula N/A B A (Malheur), B (Umatilla) or swainsonpea Acaena novae-zelandiae Biddy-biddy N/A B N/A Big-headed Centaurea macrocephala N/A N/A A (Malheur) knapweed Control (confirmed in Hyoscyamus niger Black henbane N/A A (Baker) Owyhee County) Bohemian Control (not known in Polygonum x bohemicum N/A A (Union) knotweed Owyhee County) EDRR (not known in Egeria densa Brazilian Elodea B, T N/A Owyhee County) Brownray Centaurea jacea N/A N/A A (Umatilla) knapweed Control (confirmed in A (Baker, Malheur, Solanum rostratum Buffalobur B Owyhee County) Union) Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle N/A B B (Baker), C (Malheur) Ceratocephala testiculata Bur buttercup N/A N/A C (Baker) (Ranunculus testiculatus) Buddleja davidii Butterfly bush N/A B N/A Alhagi maurorum (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Hunter Information Sheet
    Nevada Hunter Information Sheet CALIFORNIA BIGHORN SHEEP Unit 031 LOCATION: Unit 031 is located northwest of the town of Winnemucca. The unit is bounded on the north by the Oregon state line: the east by Unit 051, the south by Unit 035, and on the west by Unit 032. ELEVATION: The elevations range from 8,500' at the top of the Trout Creek Range to 4,100' along the Quinn River. TERRAIN: The unit is bounded on the west by the Bilk Creek Range, the north by the Trout Creek Range, the east by the Montana Mountains and the Double H Mountains. The Kings River Valley, a highly developed agricultural area, is situated among the ranges listed above. The Bilk Creek Range and the Trout Creek Range are mountainous with moderately sloped drainages. The Montana Mountains and the Double H Mountains are high table plateaus, rising sharply on their west faces, and sloping gradually to the east. The west slopes are short and deep; canyons draining to the east are long with deep precipitous gorges in their upper reaches. VEGETATION: The majority of the basins and slopes up to 6,500' elevation are dominated by sagebrush. Sites above those elevations typically have aspen in the drainages, islands of mahogany, and a mixed variety of shrubs and grasses. WEATHER AND CLIMATE: The precipitation varies from 7-18+ inches from the valley floor to the upper peaks. Rain and snow can cause travel problems from September through November. LAND STATUS: Approximately 85% of the unit is BLM land. Private land is mostly associated with agriculture or mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Too Wild to Drill A
    TOO WILD TO DRILL A The connection between people and nature runs deep, and the sights, sounds and smells of the great outdoors instantly remind us of how strong that connection is. Whether we’re laughing with our kids at the local fishing hole, hiking or hunting in the backcountry, or taking in the view at a scenic overlook, we all share a sense of wonder about what the natural world has to offer us. Americans around the nation are blessed with incredible wildlands out our back doors. The health of our public lands and wild places is directly tied to the health of our families, communities and economy. Unfortunately, our public lands and clean air and water are under attack. The Trump administration and some in Congress harbor deep ties to fossil fuel and mining interests, and today, resource extraction lobbyists see an unprecedented opportunity to open vast swaths of our public lands. Recent proposals to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling and shrink or eliminate protected lands around the country underscore how serious this threat is. Though some places are appropriate for responsible energy development, the current agenda in Washington, D.C. to aggressively prioritize oil, gas and coal production at the expense of all else threatens to push drilling and mining deeper into our wildest forests, deserts and grasslands. Places where families camp and hike today could soon be covered with mazes of pipelines, drill rigs and heavy machinery, or contaminated with leaks and spills. This report highlights 15 American places that are simply too important, too special, too valuable to be destroyed for short-lived commercial gains.
    [Show full text]
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Species Management Plan for the Upper Humboldt River Drainage Basin
    STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN Prepared by John Elliott SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2004 LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN SUBMITTED BY: _______________________________________ __________ John Elliott, Supervising Fisheries Biologist Date Nevada Department of Wildlife, Eastern Region APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Richard L. Haskins II, Fisheries Bureau Chief Date Nevada Department of Wildlife _______________________________________ __________ Kenneth E. Mayer, Director Date Nevada Department of Wildlife REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Robert Williams, Field Supervisor Date Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service _______________________________________ __________ Ron Wenker, State Director Date U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management _______________________________________ __________ Edward C. Monnig, Forest Supervisor Date Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest U.S.D.A. Forest Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………..1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….…2 AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES……………………………………………………………….…4 CURRENT STATUS……………………………………………………………………………..6 RECOVERY OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………………19 RECOVERY ACTIONS…………………………………………………………………………21 RECOVERY ACTION PRIORITIES BY SUBBASIN………………………………………….33 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE……………………………………………………………..47
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Department of Wildlife
    Nevada Department of Wildlife BBIIGG GGAAMMEE RREELLEEAASSEE PPLLAANN For FISCAL YEARS 2014 AND 2015 (August 2013 – June 2015) August 2013 FY 2012 and 2013 BIG GAME RELEASE PLAN SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS Number Species Date Location County Type Released Desert Bighorn 10/29/11 Excelsior Mountains Mineral A 20 10/30 & Virginia Range Storey R 42 11/3/11 10/30/11 Gold Buttes Clark A 17 10/30 Delamar Mountains Lincoln A 35 &10/31/11 11/1/11 Meadow Valley Mtns Lincoln A 24 11/2/11 South Pahroc Range Lincoln A 25 4/30 & Virginia Range Storey A 11 5/2/12 5/22/12 Excelsior Mountains Mineral A 7 11/3/12 Excelsior Mountains Mineral A 25 California 11/5/11 Calico Mtn/Capitol Pk Humboldt A 25 Bighorn 11/7/11 Martin Creek, Santa Rosas Humboldt A 27 2/2 & Massacre Rim Washoe A 29 2/3/12 11/6/12 Jackson Mountains Humboldt A 23 1/15/13 Hays Canyon Range Washoe A 30 Santa Rosa Range (Peterman 1/16/13 Humboldt A 25 Creek) Rocky Mountain 2/6/12 Ruby Mountains Elko A 11 2/14/13 East Humboldt Range Elko A 20 1 FY 2014 and 2015 DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP PROPOSED RELEASE SUMMARY Location County Type Number Agency Candelaria Hills Mineral Augmentation 50 BLM - Stillwater Excelsior Mineral Augmentation 30 BLM - Stillwater Mountains Sonoma Range Humboldt Augmentation 50 BLM – Humboldt River Boulder Canyon, Delamar Lincoln Augmentation 30 BLM - Caliente Mountains Virginia Range Storey Augmentation 30 Private Gold Buttes Clark Augmentation 15 BLM – Southern Nevada Proposed source populations: Bare Mountains, Monte Cristo Range, Lone Mountain, River Mountains, Muddy Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Man Geology Black Rock Desert.Pdf
    GEOLOGY OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT By Cathy Busby Professor of Geology University of California Santa Barbara http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/busby BURNING MAN EARTH GUARDIANS PAVILION 2012 LEAVE NO TRACE Please come find me and Iʼll give you a personal tour of the posters! You are here! In one of the most amazing geologic wonderlands in the world! Fantastic rock exposure, spectacular geomorphic features, and a long history, including: 1. PreCambrian loss of our Australian neighbors by continental rifting, * 2. Paleozoic accretion of island volcanic chains like Japan (twice!), 3. Mesozoic compression and emplacement of a batholith, 4. Cenozoic stretching and volcanism, plus a mantle plume torching the base of the continent! Let’s start with what you can see on the playa and from the playa: the Neogene to Recent geology, which is the past ~23 million years (= Ma). Note: Recent = past 15,000 years http://www.terragalleria.com Then we’ll “build” the terrane you are standing on, beginning with a BILLION years ago, moving through the Paleozoic (old life, ~540-253 Ma), Mesozoic (age of dinosaurs, ~253-65 Ma)) and Cenozoic (age of mammals, ~65 -0 Ma). Neogene to Recent geology Black Rock Playa extends 100 miles, from Gerlach to the Jackson Mountains. The Black Rock Desert is divided into two arms by the Black Rock Range, and covers 1,000 square miles. Empire (south of Gerlach)has the U.S. Gypsum mine and drywall factory (brand name “Sheetrock”), and thereʼs an opal mine at base of Calico Mtns. Neogene to Recent geology BRP = The largest playa in North America “Playa” = a flat-bottomed depression, usually a dry lake bed 3,500ʼ asl in SW, 4,000ʼ asl in N Land speed record: 1997 - supersonic car, 766 MPH Runoff mainly from the Quinn River, which heads in Oregon ~150 miles north.
    [Show full text]
  • Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Final EIS, Appendix B, Mining Plan Of
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project Appendix B Mining Plan of Operations This page intentionally left blank. Appendix B – Mining Plan of Operations APPENDIX B. MINING PLAN OF OPERATIONS Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project B-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix B – Mining Plan of Operations This page intentionally left blank. B-2 Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Thacker Pass Project Proposed Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan Permit Application July 2019 October 2019 - Revised Submitted to: Bureau of Land Management Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Winnemucca District Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation Humboldt River Field Office 901 S Stewart Street, Suite 4001 5100 East Winnemucca Boulevard Carson City, Nevada 89701 Winnemucca, Nevada 89445 Submitted by: LithiumNevada Lithium Nevada Corp. 3685 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89509 Contact: Edward (Ted) Grandy, VP Legal and Regulatory Affairs Thacker Pass Project – Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan LithiumNevada Summary Lithium Nevada Corp. (LNC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC), proposes to construct, operate, reclaim, and close an open pit lithium mining and processing operation, the Thacker Pass Project (Project), located on public lands in northern Humboldt County, Nevada. The surface and subsurface mineral estates associated with the Project are located on public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Winnemucca District, and controlled by federal unpatented lode mining claims owned by LNC. LNC is submitting this Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan (Plan) to develop the Project in accordance with BLM Surface Management Regulations under 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 3809, Surface Occupancy regulations under 43 CFR 3715, and Nevada reclamation regulations under Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 519A.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Granite Peak stock area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors DeRuyter, Vernon Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:09:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555132 GEOLOGY OF THE GRANITE PEAK STOCK AREA, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA by Vernon Donald DeRuyter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Re­ quests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de­ partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the pro­ posed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]