DOCSLIB.ORG

Humboldt River Chronology Part III—Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humboldt River Chronology Part III—Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Humboldt River Chronology Part III—Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries 1900 (February 8) It soon became evident that the plea presented in the Reese River Reveille (Austin) in September 1898 to eliminate the carp from the Humboldt River had met with little success. The Silver State (Winnemucca) reported in a very long article that there was no apparent use for carp: “Before the carp were placed in the river, the Humboldt was one of the best trout streams in the State; now the carp have overstocked the river, taken all the feed and destroyed the spawn of the other fish, so today you can catch nothing but carp…”1 1900 (February 27) In an early reference to the eventual construction of Rye Patch Reservoir, the Tuscarora Times-Review reported that “The ranchers in the vicinity of Lovelocks [Lovelock] have spent over $100,000 in litigation and this has not settled the water question and has not added a drop to the present supply. This [same] sum spent in storage reservoirs would have settled the water question in short order, but possibly the ranchers didn’t think of so simple a scheme as that.”2 1900 It was around this time that the annual cheatgrass began to replace the depleted climax perennial grass-forb understory and out-compete sagebrush that had been thinned or eliminated by range wildfires or excessive grazing by cattle and sheep throughout the Humboldt River Basin. This cheatgrass “invasion” would have extensive effects on trends in future wildfires as well as the habitats of animal species. For example, sharp-tail grouse and sage grouse, which relies on native grasses and sage brush, have been replaced in many areas by chukar partridge, which thrives on cheatgrass.3 1901 (March 28) Four years after taking enforcement authority away from the Nevada Fish Commissioner (see March 22, 1897 entry) with respect to the requirement for installing fish ladders on all dams, the Nevada Legislature had a change of heart with the passage of “An Act to provide for the preservation of fish in the waters of this State, and matters properly relating thereto.” Section 2 restored that authority, at least jointly, and required that “All persons…who have erected, or may hereafter erect, all dams, water weirs, or other obstruction to the free passage of fish…shall construct and keep in repair, to the satisfaction of the Fish Commissioner, fish-ways or fish-ladders…and it shall be the duty of the Fish Commissioner and of the District Attorneys…so far as practicable, [to] enforce the requirements of this section…”4 1901 (June 7) In a nostalgic reflection of by-gone days, the Nevada State Herald (Wells) reported on finding an idyllic place on the (Little) Trout Creek which resembled fishing conditions which probably existed when the first Europeans settlers arrived in this area: “…about twelve miles from town… almost alive with mountain trout from four to ten inches in length…stream winds down through a wooded canyon for a mile or two before it enters a wide flat below where the water is used for irrigating…”5 [Note: Trout Creek is a tributary of Bishop Creek and is located about 12 miles due north of Wells. It drains the southern and eastern slopes of Antelope Peak in the Snake Mountain Range.] 1901 (August 31) Showing high regard for abstinence, as well as a hint to the hunting impaired, the Tuscarora Times-Review noted that “The season for killing wild ducks and geese will begin Sunday, September 1st. There are plenty of ducks this year and hunting will be good. Poor marksmen and others who have, in conformance with law refrained from killing wild geese and ducks may now slaughter away with impunity mixed with properly charged Nevada Water Basin Information and Chronology Series III–1 Humboldt River Chronology—Part III DIVISION OF WATER PLANNING shells.”6 1902 (June 17) Congress passed the Reclamation Act which authorized the U.S. Secretary of the Interior to locate, construct, operate, and maintain facilities for the storage, diversion, and development of waters for the reclamation of arid and semiarid lands in the Western States. To facilitate these functions, in July 1902 the Secretary of the Interior established the U.S. Reclamation Service (USRS) within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). In March 1907 the USRS was established as a separate entity apart from the USGS and in June 1923 the name was changed to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). The basic purpose of the Reclamation Act was to assist states and local governments to stabilize and stimulate local and regional economies, enhance and protect the environment, and improve the quality of life through the development of water and related land resources throughout the 17 contiguous western states and Hawaii.7 This act committed the federal government to construct water storage and irrigation projects in the West and reclaim arid lands for cultivation and settlement.8 1902 (July 18) In reporting on a camping trip along Tabor Creek (which flows into the Humboldt River nearly 20 miles below Wells and two miles up from Deeth), the Nevada State Herald (Wells) painted a pastoral picture: “…shaded by large cottonwood trees, with green grass as a carpet. Roses and flowers in profusion…In this stream is found an abundance of solid, juicy, speckled trout of the native and eastern brook variety…”9 1903 (February 16) The Nevada Legislature passed the Irrigation Act of 1903 which, among other things, created the Office of State Engineer to solve water problems, to protect existing water rights, and to bring about a better method to utilize the state’s water resources. This represented the state’s first step in providing a speedy and relatively inexpensive method of adjudicating existing (vested) water rights.10 According to this act, “All natural water courses and natural lakes, and the waters thereof which are not held in private ownership, belong to the public, and are subject to appropriation for a beneficial use…” Notably absent from this legislation was any provision to control new appropriations for water as well as wording as to the appropriation of underground water.11 This act also provided for the cooperation of the State of Nevada with the Secretary of the Interior in the construction and administration of irrigation works for the reclamation of arid lands in the state under the recently passed National Reclamation Act of 1902. State Engineer offices in Western states were an essential corollary to the National Reclamation Act. Implied in the Reclamation Act was the primacy of the Department of the Interior (USDI) and its U.S. Reclamation Service over water development projects. In fact, with respect to water, individual state sovereignty was so limited that candidates to the office of State Engineer had to be approved by the USDI before appointment by the governor.12 1904 After the Southern Pacific Railroad realigned its railroad districts, a roundhouse was built at what was to become the town of Imlay, located approximately 32 “track” miles down the Humboldt River from Winnemucca. The station served the Imlay mine to the south where a 10-stamp mill had been built, and four other mining companies were headquartered there as well. A post office opened first in the town, and within another three or four years the bustling community had a restaurant, hotel, physician, church, boarding house, livery stable, mercantile company, three saloons and a few hundred people. During the 1950’s the railroad relocated their shop facilities and Imlay’s population quickly departed to where only about 60 people live there at present.13 1905 (March 1) The Nevada Legislature amended the Irrigation Act of 1903 to require that any III–2 Nevada Water Basin Information and Chronology Series DIVISION OF WATER PLANNING Humboldt River Chronology—Part III person desiring to appropriate water file an application with the Nevada State Engineer for a permit. The application form was to describe the source of water, location of proposed works, amount of water needed, purpose for which the water was to be used, and other information. If the State Engineer found that there existed unappropriated water, he could grant a permit. Within six months following such approval the applicant was required to file a map in support of such application. Upon satisfactory proof that the application had been “perfected,” i.e., the water had been diverted and put to beneficial use, the State Engineer could issue a certificate of appropriation. The act also provided a method to adjudicate existing water rights.14 1905 (March 16) Either recognizing the impossibility of expecting a single individual to enforce the state’s fish ladder requirement or, more probably, wishing to diffuse such authority and avoid the issue altogether, the Nevada Legislature passed “An Act to provide for the appointment of a Board of Fish Commissioners and to define their duties.” Section 1 of this act established a three-member Board of Fish Commissioners and gave them rather vague duties: “…may superintend and direct the construction of fish-ways and fish-ladders that may be built in the streams and waters of this State…”15 [Emphasis added] 1906 After the disastrous cattle losses of the “White Winter” of 1889-90, sheep began to move into the North Fork of the Humboldt River sub-basin. By this year several large sheep outfits had bought, leased or homesteaded enough key acreage to effectively control the summer range in many of the basin’s upper watersheds. This was not only the case the Independence Mountains, but also the high country formerly used as Daniel Murphey’s16 summer range around Gold Creek and the headwaters of the Bruneau River in the Jarbidge Mountains, lying adjacent to the northern boundary of the North Fork sub-basin.17 1906 (May) To protect the valuable watershed source areas of the North Fork of the Humboldt River sub-basin from the growing threats of severe grazing, the Independence Forest Reserve was established.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sur-Metre
    The Sur-Metre "D1mn" has geared wmches operated From under the deck, the wmches alongs1de the mam cockpit having large drums for Geno4 sheet Md spinnaker ge4r Note the Geno4 sheet lead blocks on the r4il, the boom downhaulcJnd the rod riggmg Just o~fter a sto~rt of tbe Sixes. No. 72 is Stanley Barrows' Strider, No. 38 is George So~t~cbn's /ll o~ybe, 50 is Ripples, · sailed by Sally Swigart. 46 Vemotl Edler's Capriu, o~ml 77 is St. Fro~tlciS , sailed by VincetJt Jervis. Lmai was out aheatl o~Jld to windward.- Photo by Kent Hitchcock. MEN and BOATS Midwinter Regatta at Los Angeles Again Deanonstrates That it is not Enough to Have a Fast Boat; for Boat, Skippe r and Crew Must All he Good to Form n Winning Combination AS IT the periect weather. or the outside competition, the time-tested maxim that going up the beach is best. Evidently W or the lack of acrimonious protest hearings, or the he did it on the off chance of gaining by splitting with Prel11de, smooth-running race committees, or the fact that it was the first which was leading him by some six minutes. Angelita mean­ regatta of the year, or all four rea~ ons that made this Midwinter while was ardently fo ll owing the maxim and to such good seem to top all others? advantage that when the two went about and converged llngl!l­ Anyway, there had been a great deal of advance speculation. it,/J starboard tack put her ahead as Yucca passed an elephant's How would the men from San francisco Bay do with their new e)•ebrow astern.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Mining Evolved More Favorably in Mexico Than Peru
    Created by Richard L. Garner 3/9/2007 1 MINING TRENDS IN THE NEW WORLD 1500-1810 "God or Gold?" That was the discussion question on an examination that I took many years ago when I started my studies in Latin American history. I do not recall how I answered the question. But the phrase has stuck in my mind ever since. And it has worked its way into much of the history written about the conquest and post-conquest periods, especially the Spanish conquests. From the initial conquests in the Caribbean and certainly after the conquests of Mexico and Peru the search for minerals became more intensive even as the Spanish Crown and its critics argued over religious goals. In the middle of the sixteenth century after major silver discoveries in Mexico and Peru the value of the output of the colonial mines jumped significantly from a few million pesos annually (mainly from gold) to several tens of millions. Perhaps “Gold” (mineral output) had not yet trumped “God” (religious conversion) on every level and in every region, but these discoveries altered the economic and financial equation: mining while not the largest sector in terms of value or labor would become the vehicle for acquiring and consolidating wealth. Until the late seventeenth century Spanish America was the New World’s principal miner; but then the discovery of gold in Brazil accorded it the ranking gold producer in the New World while Spanish American remained the ranking silver producer. The rise of mining altered fundamentally the course of history in the New World for the natives, the settlers, and the rulers and had no less of an effect on the rest of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway
    Back Country Byways . An Invitation to Discover There is an axiom among seasoned travelers advising that the best way to get to know a new place is to get off the highway and visit the back roads, the side trails and the hidden, out-of-the-way corners where the true qualities wait to be discovered. The same axiom holds true for America’s public lands, the vast reaches of our nation that are all too often seen only from the windows of speeding cars or the tiny portholes of airliners. The Bureau of Land Management, America’s largest land managing agency, is providing an exciting opportunity for more Americans to get to know their lands by getting off the main roads for leisurely trips on a series of roads and trails being dedicated as Back Country Byways. The Back Country Byways Program, an outgrowth of the national Scenic Byways Program, is designed to encourage greater use of these existing back roads through greater public awareness. The system is BUREAUREAU OOFF LANDLAND MANMANAGEMENTGEMENT expected to expand to 100 roads when completed. In Nevada, each byway has a character and beauty of its own, taking travelers through scenery that is uniquely Nevadan, into historic areas that helped shape our state and near areas that have been largely untouched by man. They can see the multiple uses of their lands and come to a greater awareness of the need for the conservation and wise use of these resources. And all this can be accomplished at little cost to the taxpayer. Because the roads are already in place, only interpretive signs and limited facilities are needed to better serve the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Building on a Firm Foundation
    Building on a Firm Foundation FY 2014 Annual Report HHH Governing Board Wyatt Beazley IV Chairman Vickie Snead Immediate Past Chairman Kelli Meadows Treasurer Brooke Taylor Secretary Directors Melissa Ball Mark Herndon Jennifer Pitts JoAnn Burton Marcos Irigaray Cathy Plotkin Maureen Denlea Betty Sue LePage Marianne Radcliff Karen Emroch John Lewis Leslie Stack Earl Ferguson Beth McClelland Jamie Sutton Linda Georgiadis Brett Mutnick John Syer Marsha Ginther Richard November Kate Van Sumeren Lynn Green Nicholas Pace Wanda Yu HHH Staff Stacy Brinkley JC Poma President and CEO Manager of Volunteers Shawn M. Walker Debra Rogers Chief Financial Officer Annual Fund/Grants Manager Beverly Bean Debbie Cox Development Director Housekeeping Supervisor Open Jasper McLean Operations Manager Maintenance Supervisor Zita Lee Office Manager Treating guests like family since 1984 Babs Jackson President/CEO Dear Friends, /5%-"%1 Bobby Whitten This pastC hyairemaanr was one of transition and inspiration for the Hospital Hospitality House of Vickie Snead RichmoCnhadirm. an -WElecet said good-bye to our out-going CEO, Babs Jackson in December and we welcomed Stacy Brinkley, our new CEO in January. We have been inspired by our 30 years of Wyatt Beazley IV service toT reoasuurre rmany guests and hospital partners and are committed to providing hospitality in the coming decades. Brooke Taylor We spent Stehcreta rlyast 6 months of FY14 year planning for our future. We listened to our guests, our (%2%!2/./&-)1!#,%2)2(%1%!.$)3)26/.$%1&4,,7%5)$%.3!3/20)3!,/20)3!,)37 communDitiyre cptoarsrtners and our stakeholders. We reviewed guest data and analyzed the results.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canada's Cup Years
    The Canada i!ii Cup Years ~m 31 THE ROCHESTER YACHT CLUB " 1877 - 2000 Th~ time the Chicago Yacht Club, Columbia Yacht Club of Chicago, 10( THE TURN OF THE ~wo Detroit Cltlbs, alld tile Rocheste, Yacht Club had ,11ade their bids. It was thought fair to give an American Lake Ontario yach! CENTURY c,<,b the preference and RYC won. The years between the founding of Rochester Yacht Club in 1902 1877 and about 1910 are described as Golden Years. Membership had grown froln the original 46 charter members to Each club built one boat under a new rule adopted in 1902 in 318. A personal insight on the scene in the harbor just after the the 40-foot class chosen by P, CYC. A long bowsprit brought turn of the century was obtained fi’om Past Commodore John the Canadian boat, to be named Stralh{’oIla, to 61 feet long. Van Voorhis. Van Voorhis’ father would take him to dinner at theRYC had mustered a syndicate consisting of Hiram W. Sibley, West Side Clubhouse and they would look out on the river fiom James S. Watson, Thomas N. Finucane, Arthur G. Yates. John the porch and his father told him: N. Beckley, Albert O. Fenn, Walter B. Duffy, and Charles M. Everest. The group settled on a design by William Gardner, to Twenty to 30 sailboats were moored, mostly on be built at the Wood Boatyard in City Island, N.Y. The the east side of lhe river belween lhe Naval Iromh, quoil measured 65 feet overall. 40 t~et on the waterline, and had a beam of 12.5 feet with a draft of 0 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and I-80 Gold Corp
    AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. BC0767129 200 Granville Street, Suite 202 Vancouver BC V6C 1S4 Canada T +1 604 669 0044 E [email protected] W amcconsultants.com Technical Report Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and i-80 Gold Corp Humboldt County, Nevada, USA In accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” of the Canadian Securities Administrators Qualified Persons: D Nussipakynova, P.Geo. P Greenhill, FAusIMM (CP) AMC Project 720031 Effective date 23 July 2020 Report date 22 January 2021 Unearth a smarter way Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and i-80 Gold Corp 720031 1 Summary 1.1 Introduction This Technical Report (the Report) provides an update of the Mineral Resource estimates and metallurgy of the Mineral Resources identified within the Getchell Project (Property) located in Humboldt County, Nevada, USA. The Report has been prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (AMC) of Vancouver, Canada on behalf of Premier Gold Mines Limited / i-80 Gold Corp (i-80 or the Companies). On 10 August 2020, Premier entered into a definitive purchase agreement with affiliates of Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. to acquire from Waterton all of the outstanding membership interests of Osgood Mining Company LLC (OMC). The Property comprises a number of property parcels which collectively encompass 2,545 acres in the Potosi mining district. The four-square miles of land contain all areas of past gold production and the area of the currently estimated Mineral Resource. This area includes the historical Pinson Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • What Will Be Your Mission for the Gweduck?
    GWEDUCK GWEDUCK Ellison-Mahon Gweduck Represented by Composite Creations, Inc. Prineville, Oregon 97754 Walter Fellows 206-407-8285 [email protected] www.gweduck.com GWEDUCK GWEDUCK—MODERNIZING THE PERSONAL FLYING BOAT 2015 Gweduck Large useful load Gross Weight: 6,200 lb Superior rough water capability Payload: 2,000 lb Can taxi out on a beach Effective Load*: 1,360 lb Good water handling Cruise Speed: 119 kts Composite airframe resists corro- Fuel Burn: 21 gph sion Airframe: Composite Low spray in props and engines * Load with fuel for 300 nm round reduces maintenance costs trip Good fuel economy increasing ef- fective useful load Acceptable engine out perform- ance 1940s GRUMMAN WIDGEON GRUMMAN GOOSE Grumman flying boats built Large useful load Superior rough water capability Can taxi out on a beach Issues Poor water handling Gross Weight: 8,000 lb Gross Weight: 4,500 lb Payload: 2,575 lb Aluminum airframe corrosion Payload: 1,411 lb Effective Load:*: 1,060 lb High maintenance cost from spray in Effective Load:* 720 lb props and engines Cruise Speed: 119 kts Cruise Speed: 115 kts Fuel Burn: 50 gph Poor fuel economy reducing useful load Fuel Burn: 22-28 gph Airframe: Aluminum Poor engine out performance Airframe: Aluminum Available aircraft are high time as pro- duction ended in the 50s GWEDUCK WHAT WILL BE YOUR MISSION FOR THE GWEDUCK? Access your home on the water Air sea camper Exploring the world’s wildest places Tender passengers and supplies to your cruising yacht Fishing and hunting Filming wildlife Supply adventure expeditions MEETING YOUR MISSION WITH..
    [Show full text]
  • Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Species Management Plan for the Upper Humboldt River Drainage Basin
    STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN Prepared by John Elliott SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2004 LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER HUMBOLDT RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN SUBMITTED BY: _______________________________________ __________ John Elliott, Supervising Fisheries Biologist Date Nevada Department of Wildlife, Eastern Region APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Richard L. Haskins II, Fisheries Bureau Chief Date Nevada Department of Wildlife _______________________________________ __________ Kenneth E. Mayer, Director Date Nevada Department of Wildlife REVIEWED BY: _______________________________________ __________ Robert Williams, Field Supervisor Date Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service _______________________________________ __________ Ron Wenker, State Director Date U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management _______________________________________ __________ Edward C. Monnig, Forest Supervisor Date Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest U.S.D.A. Forest Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………..1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….…2 AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES……………………………………………………………….…4 CURRENT STATUS……………………………………………………………………………..6 RECOVERY OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………………19 RECOVERY ACTIONS…………………………………………………………………………21 RECOVERY ACTION PRIORITIES BY SUBBASIN………………………………………….33 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE……………………………………………………………..47
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Cultural Resources
    4.5 – Cultural Resources 4.5 Cultural Resources This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources along the IC Project Alignment, identifies applicable significance thresholds, assesses the IC Project’s impacts to these resources and their significance, and recommends measures to avoid or substantially reduce any effects found to be potentially significant. Cultural resources are defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use that is identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building/structural, and traditional resources. Archaeological resources include prehistoric and historic remains of human activity. Prehistoric resources can be composed of lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Historic-era resources are typically those that are 50 years or older. Historic archaeological resources can consist of structural remains (e.g., concrete foundations), historic objects (e.g., bottles and cans), features (e.g., refuse deposits or scatters), and sites (e.g., resources that contain one or more of the aforementioned categories). Built environment resources range from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, cemeteries, and electrical infrastructure, such as transmission lines, substations, and generating facilities. A traditional cultural resource is a resource associated with the cultural practices, traditions, beliefs, lifeways, arts, crafts, or social institutions of a living community. They are rooted in a traditional community’s history and are important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community. See Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion on cultural resources of potential importance to California Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview of the Heinz Ranch, South Parcel (Approximately 1378 Acres) for the Stone Gate Master Planned Community, Washoe County, Nevada
    Cultural Resources Overview of the Heinz Ranch, South Parcel (approximately 1378 acres) for the Stone Gate Master Planned Community, Washoe County, Nevada Project Number: 2016-110-1 Submitted to: Heinz Ranch Company, LLCt 2999 Oak Road, Suite 400 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared by: Michael Drews Dayna Giambastiani, MA, RPA Great Basin Consulting Group, LLC. 200 Winters Drive Carson City, Nevada 89703 July7, 2016 G-1 Summary Heinz Ranch was established in 1855 by Frank Heinz, an emigrant from Germany, who together with his wife Wilhelmina, turned it into a profitable cow and calf operation (Nevada Department of Agriculture 2016). In 2004, Heinz Ranch received the Nevada Centennial Ranch and Farm award from the Nevada Department of Agriculture for being an active ranch for over 100 years. A Class II archaeological investigation of the property was conducted in May and June 2016. Several prehistoric archaeological sites have been recorded on the property. Habitation sites hold the potential for additional research and have previously been determined eligible to the National Register of Historic Places. Historic sites relating to mining and transportation along with the ranching landscape are also prominent. Architectural resources on the property consist of several barns, outbuildings and residences. The barns are notable for their method of construction. Many are constructed of hand hewn posts and beams, and assembled with pegged mortise and tenon joinery. They date to the earliest use of the ranch. Residences generally date to the 1930s. Historic sites and resources located on Heinz Ranch provide an opportunity for more scholarly research into the prehistory and history of Cold Springs Valley (also Laughton’s Valley) and the region in general.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Asset Handbook 2019 Asset Handbook
    2019 Asset Handbook 2019 Asset Handbook Franco-Nevada Corporation’s 2019 Asset Handbook is intended to assist investors and analysts in their understanding of our business and portfolio of assets. Franco-Nevada Corporation is the leading gold royalty and streaming company with the largest and most diversified portfolio of assets. The Company’s business model provides investors with gold price and exploration optionality with less exposure to operating risks. Franco-Nevada has a strong balance sheet and uses its free cash flow to expand its portfolio and pay dividends. It trades under the symbol FNV on both the Toronto and New York stock exchanges. Since its IPO, Franco-Nevada’s share price has outperformed the gold price and all relevant gold equity benchmarks. Franco-Nevada is the gold investment that works. Information relating to projects, properties and their owners and operators presented in this Asset Handbook has been sourced from the public disclosure of the owners and operators of our assets available as of March 15, 2019. More current information may be available in our subsequent disclosure and our website. This Asset Handbook contains information about many of our assets, including those that may not currently be material to us. Also, the description and depiction of our business and assets have been simplified for presentation purposes. Dollar references are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. This Asset Handbook should be read with reference to the explanatory notes and cautionary statements contained in the Additional Information section found at the end of this Asset Handbook. Please also refer to the additional supporting information and explanatory notes found in our Annual Information Form (“AIF”), our annual Management’s Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A“), and our Annual Report on Form 40-F available at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively, and on our website at www.franco-nevada.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Hostplants of Butterflies in Nevada
    HOLARCTIC LEPIDOPTERA Editor: Andrei Sourakov Assoc. Editor: Thomas C. Emmel ASSOCIATION FOR TROPICAL VOLUME 12 NUMBER 1-2 August 2008 LEPIDOPTERA Founded 1989 ADVISORY COUNCIL LARVAL HOSTPLANTS James K. Adams (USA) Martin Krüger (South Africa) Andrés O. Angulo (Chile) Tosio Kumata (Japan) OF BUTTERFLIES IN NEVADA Yutaka Arita (Japan) Jean-Francois Landry (Canada) George T. Austin (USA) Torben B. Larsen (England) Jorge Llorente B. (Mexico) Vitor O. Becker, Planaltina, Brazil by Zsolt Bálint (Hungary) Martin Lödl (Austria) Henry S. Barlow (Malaysia) Wolfram Mey (Germany) George T. Austin Dubi Benyamini (Israel) Kauri Mikkola (Finland) Ronald Boender (USA) Scott E. Miller (USA) and Keith S. Brown Jr. (Brazil) Joël Minet (France) José A. Clavijo A. (Venezuela) Eugene G. Munroe (Canada) Patrick J. Leary Charles V. Covell Jr. (USA) K.-T. Park (South Korea) U. Dall’Asta (Belgium) Rod E. Parrott (Canada) Philip J. DeVries (USA) Amnuay Pinratana (Thailand) Julian P. Donahue (USA) Rimantas Puplesis (Lithuania) CONTENTS Eric Garraway (Jamaica) Jozef Razowski (Poland) Dale H. Habeck (USA) M. Alma Solis (USA) INTRODUCTION 1 NYMPHALIDAE 95 Christoph Häuser (Germany) Dieter Stüning (Germany) METHODS 1 Libytheinae 95 Lowell N. Harris (USA) Gerhard Tarmann (Austria) Toshiya Hirowatari (Japan) Paul Thiaucourt (France) LARVAL HOSTPLANTS 2 Heliconiinae 96 Hiroshi Inoue (Japan) Jürgen H. R. Thiele (Germany) HESPERIIDAE 2 Nymphalinae 99 Daniel H. Janzen (USA) Antonio Vives M. (Spain) Kurt Johnson (USA) Hsiau-Yue Wang (Taiwan) Eudaminae 2 Limenitidinae 119 Roger L. Kitching (Australia) Per O. Wickman (Sweden) Pyrginae 2 George O. Krizek (USA) Allen M. Young (USA) Apaturinae 124 Hesperiinae 8 Satyrinae 124 PAPILIONIDAE 14 OFFICERS Danainae 126 President: Ulf Eitschberger, Germany Parnassiinae 14 DISCUSSION 127 Vice-President: Thomas C.
    [Show full text]