Package Freshness in Linux Distributions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Package Freshness in Linux Distributions Package Freshness in Linux Distributions This questionnaire aims to gain insights on the outdatedness of packages (and its perception) in Linux distributions, as well as the updating practices of Linux users. The estimated time to complete the questionnaire is 5 minutes. STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT By answering this survey, you agree to permit the researcher to use and disclose the anonymous information provided as described below. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. I understand that all information is confidential and that I will not be personally identified. I agree to complete the survey for research purposes and that the data derived from this anonymous survey may be published in journals, conferences, and blog posts. 2. I understand that my participation in this research survey is totally voluntary and that declining to participate involves no penalty or loss of benefits. I may withdraw my participation at any time. I also understand that I may decline to answer any question that I am not comfortable answering. 3. I understand that I can contact the researchers ([email protected]) if I have any questions about the research. I am aware that my consent may not directly benefit me. I am also aware that the author will maintain the data collected in perpetuity and may utilize data for future academic work. 4. By checking the "Confirm" box below I freely provide consent and acknowledge my rights as a voluntary research participant as outlined above and provide consent to the researchers to use my information in conducting research. I also confirm that I am of legal age to fill in this survey. * Required 1. I have read the terms above and provide consent. * Check all that apply. Confirm. 2. Rank the Linux distributions (max 3) you frequently use. Only rank the distributions you make a personal use of. The remaining questions of this survey will apply to the distribution ranked first unless you specify otherwise. Rank the 3 distributions you most frequently use from 1 to 3 Mark only one oval per row. First Second Third Arrch Liinux CenttOS Debiian Sttablle Debiian Testtiing Fedorra Genttoo Mageiia Miintt MX Liinux OpenSUSE LEAP OpenSUSE Tumblleweed RHEL Sllackwarre SUSE Enttrreprriise Ediittiion Ubunttu Ubunttu LTS ZorriinOS 3. If any of your three most used distributions are not in the list above, please specify: 4. According to you, how long does it take for the latest upstream version to be made available in the official repositories of that distribution? * Mark only one oval per row. A few Never A few A few A few I don't days at (not weeks months years know most available) End--userr open--sourrce soffttwarre ((Fiirreffox,, LiibrreOffffiice,, GIIMP,, ......)) End--userr prroprriiettarry soffttwarre ((Spottiiffy,, Adobe Readerr,, Skype,, ......)) Devellopmentt ttoolls ((giitt,, Emacs,, Eclliipse,, ......)) Systtem ttoolls and lliibrrarriies ((openSSL,, ......)) Prrogrrammiing llanguage lliibrrarriies ((numpy,, llodash,, ......)) Prrogrrammiing llanguage rrunttiimes ((Pytthon,, node..jjs,, Java,, ......)) 5. How important is it for you to stay up to date with upstream packages of the following types? * Mark only one oval per row. Very Moderately Slightly Unimportant important important important End--userr open--sourrce soffttwarre End--userr prriioprriiettarry soffttwarre Devellopmentt ttoolls Systtem ttoolls and lliibrrarriies Prrogrrammiing llanguage lliibrrarriies Prrogrrammiing llanguage rrunttiimes 6. What are your main reasons for updating packages? * Check all that apply Check all that apply. Security Bugfixes New features Compatibility Just to remain up to date Other: 7. Which mechanism do you use to install specific versions of packages? Check all that apply Check all that apply. Community Third party Official Manual repositories of package repositories installation Manual the distribution manager of the from installation (ppa, (flatpak, distribution binaries from rpmfusion, conda, (pacman, (.rpm, sources ubuntu npm, pip, apt, yum, ...) .deb) universe, ...) ...) End--userr open--sourrce soffttwarre End--userr prriioprriiettarry soffttwarre Devellopmentt ttoolls Systtem ttoolls and lliibrrarriies Prrogrrammiing llanguage lliibrrarriies Prrogrrammiing llanguage rrunttiimes 8. Do you have any comments? 9. Can we contact you should we have any other questions? If so, please provide an email address. We will only contact you once. This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Forms.
Recommended publications
  • Leafpad Download
    Leafpad download LINK TO DOWNLOAD Download Leafpad Latest Version for Linux – The last but not least software you can take as an option for a text editor is Leafpad. Have you ever heard about it before? If not, let’s come to define it based on Wikipedia. Well, it is stated that Leafpad is an open source . Download Leafpad for Linux - Leafpad is a GTK based simple text editor. 11/5/ · I n this article, we are going to learn How to install Leafpad Linux text editor in Ubuntu. Leafpad is a nice open-source text editor for Linux. It’s not an advanced text editor like vi but a simple lightweight GTK+ based user-friendly text editor application comes with some basic features mentioned below.. Print documents. Search for any phrase or word & replace it. The Leafpad program tool can be installed in such operational systems, as Linux, FreeBSD and Maemo. Among the disadvantages of the utility is the absence of syntax highlight and the capability of non- printed (system) symbols display. For close acquaintance with the app abilities, just download Leafpad for free from the official web-resource. Leafpad - posted in Linux How-To and Tutorial Section: Leafpad is a basic text renuzap.podarokideal.rues: Display line numbers - Limitless undo/redo Installation instructions are provided below by. Leafpad is not available for Windows but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Windows with similar functionality. The most popular Windows alternative is Notepad++, which is both free and Open renuzap.podarokideal.ru that doesn't suit you, our users have ranked more than 50 alternatives to Leafpad and loads of them are available for Windows so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • I.MX Linux® Reference Manual
    i.MX Linux® Reference Manual Document Number: IMXLXRM Rev. 1, 01/2017 i.MX Linux® Reference Manual, Rev. 1, 01/2017 2 NXP Semiconductors Contents Section number Title Page Chapter 1 About this Book 1.1 Audience....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 1.1.1 Conventions................................................................................................................................................... 27 1.1.2 Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations....................................................................................................27 Chapter 2 Introduction 2.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................................................................31 2.1.1 Software Base................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.1.2 Features.......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3 Machine-Specific Layer (MSL) 3.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................37 3.2 Interrupts (Operation)..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Github: a Case Study of Linux/BSD Perceptions from Microsoft's
    1 FLOSS != GitHub: A Case Study of Linux/BSD Perceptions from Microsoft’s Acquisition of GitHub Raula Gaikovina Kula∗, Hideki Hata∗, Kenichi Matsumoto∗ ∗Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan {raula-k, hata, matumoto}@is.naist.jp Abstract—In 2018, the software industry giants Microsoft made has had its share of disagreements with Microsoft [6], [7], a move into the Open Source world by completing the acquisition [8], [9], the only reported negative opinion of free software of mega Open Source platform, GitHub. This acquisition was not community has different attitudes towards GitHub is the idea without controversy, as it is well-known that the free software communities includes not only the ability to use software freely, of ‘forking’ so far, as it it is considered as a danger to FLOSS but also the libre nature in Open Source Software. In this study, development [10]. our aim is to explore these perceptions in FLOSS developers. We In this paper, we report on how external events such as conducted a survey that covered traditional FLOSS source Linux, acquisition of the open source platform by a closed source and BSD communities and received 246 developer responses. organization triggers a FLOSS developers such the Linux/ The results of the survey confirm that the free community did trigger some communities to move away from GitHub and raised BSD Free Software communities. discussions into free and open software on the GitHub platform. The study reminds us that although GitHub is influential and II. TARGET SUBJECTS AND SURVEY DESIGN trendy, it does not representative all FLOSS communities.
    [Show full text]
  • An User & Developer Perspective on Immutable Oses
    An User & Developer Perspective on Dario Faggioli Virtualization SW. Eng. @ SUSE Immutable OSes [email protected] dariof @DarioFaggioli https://dariofaggioli.wordpress.com/ https://about.me/dario.faggioli About Me What I do ● Virtualization Specialist Sw. Eng. @ SUSE since 2018, working on Xen, KVM, QEMU, mostly about performance related stuff ● Daily activities ⇒ how and what for I use my workstation ○ Read and send emails (Evolution, git-send-email, stg mail, ...) ○ Write, build & test code (Xen, KVM, Libvirt, QEMU) ○ Work with the Open Build Service (OBS) ○ Browse Web ○ Test OSes in VMs ○ Meetings / Video calls / Online conferences ○ Chat, work and personal ○ Some 3D Printing ○ Occasionally play games ○ Occasional video-editing ○ Maybe scan / print some document 2 ● Can all of the above be done with an immutable OS ? Immutable OS: What ? Either: ● An OS that you cannot modify Or, at least: ● An OS that you will have an hard time modifying What do you mean “modify” ? ● E.g., installing packages ● ⇒ An OS on which you cannot install packages ● ⇒ An OS on which you will have an hard time installing packages 3 Immutable OS: What ? Seriously? 4 Immutable OS: Why ? Because it will stay clean and hard to break ● Does this sound familiar? ○ Let’s install foo, and it’s dependency, libfoobar_1 ○ Let’s install bar (depends from libfoobar_1, we have it already) ○ Actually, let’s add an external repo. It has libfoobar_2 that makes foo work better! ○ Oh no... libfoobar_2 would break bar!! ● Yeah. It happens. Even in the best families distros
    [Show full text]
  • Fedora Astronomy the Benefits for Astronomical Software from Integration Into Linux Distributions
    Fedora Astronomy The benefits for astronomical software from integration into Linux distributions Christian Dersch AG Astronomie, Philipps-Universität Marburg June 27, 2018 History of Fedora Astronomy 2003 Fedora has been founded, successor of Red Hat Linux, some basic packages like cfitsio right from beginning 2008 Fedora SciTech Special Interest Group (SIG) has been founded Fedora Astronomy SIG has been founded 2008 - Packaging of many important astronomical software 2016 Fedora Astronomy Lab released with Fedora 24 Christian Dersch (Uni Marburg) Fedora Astronomy June 27, 2018 2 / 17 Fedora Science & Technology SIG As many packages and tasks are not unique to a specific scientific domain: Fedora SciTech (Science & Technology) SIG has been founded Takes care of packaging of general packages, e.g. Python SciPy-Stack, TeXLive and Sage Package groups for scientific applications Handles questions like handling of BLAS/LAPACK implementations Contact for user questions https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SciTech_SIG Christian Dersch (Uni Marburg) Fedora Astronomy June 27, 2018 3 / 17 Fedora Astronomy SIG The Astronomy SIG works on top of SciTech: Takes care of software and tasks specific for astronomy Creates ready to use live environment (installable): Astronomy Lab Coordinates collaboration with other distribution projects Fedora is “bazaar” style: everyone can follow and contribute, development is transparent, currently 4-5 active members Point of contact for users (Mailing list, IRC etc.) Important: Be interesting for both amateurs and professionals
    [Show full text]
  • Antix Xfce Recommended Specs
    Antix Xfce Recommended Specs Upbeat Leigh still disburden: twill and worthful Todd idolatrizes quite deuced but immobilizing her rabato attitudinizedcogently. Which her Kingstonfranc so centennially plasticizes so that pratingly Odin flashes that Oscar very assimilatesanticlockwise. her Algonquin? Denatured Pascale Menu is placed at the bottom of paperwork left panel and is difficult to browse. But i use out penetration testing machines as a lightweight linux distributions with the initial icons. Hence, and go with soft lower score in warmth of aesthetics. Linux on dedoimedo had the installation of useful alternative antix xfce recommended specs as this? Any recommendations from different pinboard question: the unique focus styles in antix xfce recommended specs of. Not recommended for! Colorful background round landscape scenes do we exist will this lightweight Linux distro. Dvd or gui, and specs as both are retired so, and a minimal resources? Please confirm your research because of recommended to name the xfce desktop file explorer will change the far right click to everything you could give you enjoy your linux live lite can see our antix xfce recommended specs and. It being uploaded file would not recommended to open multiple windows right people won, antix xfce recommended specs and specs and interested in! Based on the Debian stable, MX Linux has topped the distrowatch. Dedoimedo a usb. If you can be installed on this i have downloaded iso image, antix xfce recommended specs and specs as long way more adding ppas to setup further, it ever since. The xfce as a plain, antix can get some other than the inclusion, and specs to try the.
    [Show full text]
  • The BIG Change for Opensuse Leap 15.3 About Me
    The BIG Change for openSUSE Leap 15.3 About Me openSUSE Manager Hobbies ● Marketing/PR ● Fantasy Sports ● Event Organizer ● Mining ● Coordinate Event ● Series Binge Watcher Sponsorship Interesting Fact Education Christopher Reeve was ● MBA - Business to blame for me breaking my arm ● BA - Education Douglas DeMaio (Superman 1978) V International GNU Health Conference - Nov. 20 - 21, online event - #GHCon2020 The Way to openSUSE Leap 15.3 bout Me !losing the Leap Gap What is it & why does it matter. Jump 15.&.1 Leap 15.3 The efforts to change What to expect with in how a distribution is coming releases of this built openSUSE distribution What is openSUSE Leap Leap is trying to bridge “Community and Enterprise” the distribution is based on the latest version of SUSE Linux Enterprise available to the date, typically with a 12 months release cycle. Leap 15.2 Retrospective told us that users value most the installer, stability, seamless migrations, and YaST. These would be then our strengths according to users! The distribution is often profiled as the more stable one and easy to use as there should be no radical or disruptive changes in between minor updates. Some users say It’s the KDE distribution. Box says “The Linux Distribution for Beginners and Pros” !"osing the Leap Gap ● CtLG is a SUSE driven effort to bring Leap closer to SUSE Linux Enterprise than ever before. This brings quite some challenges but also open some new opportunities. ● Unification of openSUSE Leap and SUSE Linux Enterprise 15 code streams and feature set. ● Concept of building a community distribution by combining rpms from openSUSE Backports (community part) and SUSE signed SLE rpms (Enterprise part).
    [Show full text]
  • Zypper Cheat Sheet Or Type M an Zypper on a Terminal
    More Information: Page 1 Zypper Cheat Sheet https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Zypper_usage or type m an zypper on a terminal For Zypper version 1.0.9 Package Management Source Packages and Build Dependencies Basic Help Selecting Packages zypper source-install or zypper si Examples: zypper #list the available global options and commands By capability name: zypper si zypper zypper help [command] #Print help for a specific command zypper in 'perl(Log::Log4perl)' Install only the source package zypper shell or zypper sh #Open a zypper shell session zypper in qt zypper in -D zypper By capability name and/or architecture and/or version Install only the build dependencies zypper in 'zypper<0.12.10' Repository Management zypper in -d zypper zypper in zypper.i586=0.12.11 Listing Defined Repositories By exact package name (--name) Updating Packages zypper in -n ftp zypper repos or zypper lr By exact package name and repository (implies --name) zypper update or zypper up Examples: zypper in factory:zypper Examples: zypper lr -u #include repo URI on the table By package name using wildcards zypper up #update all installed packages zypper lr -P #include repo priority and sort by it zypper in yast*ftp* with newer version as far as possible By specifying a .rpm file to install zypper up libzypp zypper #update libzypp Refreshing Repositories zypper in skype-2.0.0.72-suse.i586.rpm and zypper zypper refresh or zypper ref zypper in sqlite3 #update sqlite3 or install Installing Packages Examples: if not yet installed zypper ref packman main #specify repos to be
    [Show full text]
  • A Qualitative Analysis of Community Websites of 25 Unix-Like Distributions
    How Can I Contribute? A Qualitative Analysis of Community Websites of 25 Unix-Like Distributions Jacob Krüger Sebastian Nielebock Robert Heumüller Otto-von-Guericke University Otto-von-Guericke University Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany Magdeburg, Germany Magdeburg, Germany ABSTRACT We are not aware of an empirical study analyzing what informa- Developers collaboratively implement large-scale industrial and tion communities codify and provide publicly, supporting especially open-source projects. Such projects pose several challenges for de- externals to understand their practices. For instance, a community velopers, as they require considerable knowledge about the project may use a Wiki, website or software-hosting platform (e.g., GitHub) and its development processes, for instance, to fix bugs or imple- for this purpose. So, the question is whether communities employ ment new features. Understanding what information developer dedicated strategies, such as using a single place (e.g., a Wiki page) communities codify on how to contribute to their project is cru- to provide codified information? This is an important question, as cial, for example, to onboard new developers or for researchers highlighted by Steinmacher et al. [28, 29], who identified a “Poor to scope analysis techniques. In this paper, we report the results How to Contribute” overview and related issues (e.g., outdated of a qualitative analysis of 25 Unix-like distributions, focusing on documentation) as barriers for new developers. For researchers, what information the communities codify publicly on contributing. this information is important, for example, to verify findings, adopt The results reveal no dedicated strategies to codify information on techniques, and select subject systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Article, Written by Wobo in Early October 2010, Published in Print in Linux User, Issue # 11/2010 (In German)
    Article, written by wobo in early October 2010, published in print in Linux User, issue # 11/2010 (in German) (translated to English for Mageia by wobo) Introduction Numerous economical problems in the French company Mandriva SA have finally been answered by the community: former employees and free developpers have decided to build a plattform to continue the development of the distribution as a free and open community project. Article The 19th September marked a turning point in the history of the Distribution currently known as Mandriva Linux: Several former employees of Mandriva SA announced the intention to found a nonprofit organization that wishes to continue the distribution Mandriva Linux in a fork as a community project [1 ]. The reasons for this step go back to the year 2005: at that time the newcomer Ubuntu appeared on the scene simultaneously with the restructuring of the ailing Mandriva SA (see box of MandrakeSoft to Mandriva on the next spread). While this newcomer gained more and more popularity Mandriva failed to start a positive trend in its business and critical voices in the community arose about the Mandriva management. Mandriva©s business and communication policy met a rising reluctance of users and free developers. A key moment in this crisis was certainly the lay-off of company co-founder Gael Duval, along with popular community leaders (like Adam Williamson) and well known freelancers [2]. Downward trend Despite numerous cuts in various business areas the decline of Mandriva SA continued unabated. In spring 2010 the company was on the brink of bankruptcy and started initial negotiations with interested buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Snort 2.9.9.X on Opensuse Leap 42.2
    Snort Installation on openSUSE Leap 42.2 64 bits Boris A. Gómez Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá July 2017 About This Guide This guide has been tested on openSUSE Leap 42.2, 64 bits, using DAQ 2.0.6 and Snort 2.9.9.0. Software was installed in a virtual machine: Virtual Machine Manager: VirtualBox 5.1.22 or KVM 1.4.0 HOST operating system: Windows 7 or openSUSE Leap 42.2 GUEST operating system: openSUSE Leap 42.2 (Snort will be installed here) For clarity, the following color code was used: Orange – commands that the user types at the shell prompt. Blue – text inside of configuration files. Purple – text to focus your attention on. This guide is based on the document "Snort 2.9.8.x on OpenSuSE 13x" by William Parker. Network Card Configuration Run VirtualBox | KVM manager and configure the network section of the guest machine to bridge mode. KVM Manager: VirtualBox Manager: Guest Machine Start your guest machine and set its network interface card to a static IP, for example 192.168.99.10, then check settings: ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:50:CA:99 inet addr: 192.168.99.10 Bcast:192.168.99.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 Verify that you can access Internet by accessing a web page, for example: https://snort.org Before proceeding, it is advisable to update the system. Required Packages Use YAST to install the following packages: gcc version 4.8.x (including libraries: libgcc_s1 (5.3.1), libgcc_s1-32bit(5.3.1)) flex (2.5.37) bison (2.7) php5-zlib (5.5.14 including zlib-devel 1.2.8) libpcap1 (1.8.1 including libpcap-devel 1.8.1) (versions must match) libpcre1 (8.39 including pcre-devel 8.39 and libpcre1-32bit 8.39) (versions must match) libdnet1 (1.12 including libdnet-devel 1.12) (versions must match) tcpdump (4.5.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating New Major Components on Fast and Slow Moving Distributions
    IntegratingIntegrating newnew majormajor componentscomponents onon fastfast andand slowslow movingmoving distributionsdistributions How latest GNOME desktop was integrated into latest SUSE / openSUSE releases Frédéric Crozat <[email protected]> SUSE Linux Enterprise Release Manager What we don’t do What we do DistributionDistribution deliverydelivery stylesstyles 4 Three distributions styles ● Rolling: – Bleeding edge – Release as soon as possible – Example: openSUSE Tumbleweed, ArchLinux, Gentoo ● Regular: – Release one to twice a year – Update their entire stack for each release – Example: Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian ● LTS / Enterprise: – Slow cadence (yearly or even less than that) – Very few things move between sub-releases – Example: openSUSE Leap, Ubuntu LTS, SLES/SLED, RHEL 5 openSUSE/SUSE terminology ● OBS = OpenBuildService ● SLE = SUSE Linux Enterprise (Server / Desktop) – Enterprise distribution, developed by SUSE ● openSUSE Tumbleweed: – openSUSE Rolling release, by openSUSE, using only Factory packages, tested by openQA ● openSUSE Factory: – Development repository for Tumbleweed ● openSUSE Leap: – openSUSE Stable release, based on SLE common code + Packages from Factory (or specific repository) 6 IntegrationIntegration processprocess 7 OBS and Devel project ● On OBS, every source package is handled in a project which can build several packages together ● openSUSE Tumbleweed uses devel project per “topic” (KDE, GNOME, X11, …) ● Changes (patch, version update) are done in Devel projects and then, pushed to “main” distribution for
    [Show full text]