The United Nations Oil-For-Food Program: Issues of Accountability and Transparency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United Nations Oil-For-Food Program: Issues of Accountability and Transparency THE UNITED NATIONS OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAM: ISSUES OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 28, 2004 Serial No. 108–110 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/international—relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 93–391PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 21 2002 11:37 Jul 22, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\FULL\042804\93391.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska HOWARD L. BERMAN, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York Vice Chairman ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD SHERMAN, California EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida PETER T. KING, New York ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts AMO HOUGHTON, New York GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York BARBARA LEE, California ROY BLUNT, Missouri JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL, Pennsylvania RON PAUL, Texas EARL BLUMENAUER, Oregon NICK SMITH, Michigan SHELLEY BERKLEY, Nevada JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California JEFF FLAKE, Arizona ADAM B. SCHIFF, California JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia DIANE E. WATSON, California MARK GREEN, Wisconsin ADAM SMITH, Washington JERRY WELLER, Illinois BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota MIKE PENCE, Indiana BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky THADDEUS G. MCCOTTER, Michigan KATHERINE HARRIS, Florida THOMAS E. MOONEY, SR., Staff Director/General Counsel ROBERT R. KING, Democratic Staff Director JOCK SCHARFEN, Chief Counsel FRANK RECORD, Senior Professional Staff Member GREGG RICKMAN, Senior Professional Staff Member, Subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia LIBERTY DUNN, Staff Associate (II) VerDate Mar 21 2002 11:37 Jul 22, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\FULL\042804\93391.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL C O N T E N T S Page WITNESSES Howar Ziad, Representative, Kurdistan Regional Government, United Nations Liaison Office ........................................................................................................ 10 Danielle Pletka, Vice President, Foreign and Defense Policy Studies, Amer- ican Enterprise Institute ..................................................................................... 50 John G. Ruggie, Ph.D., Evron and Jeane Kirkpatrick Professor of Inter- national Affairs, and Director, Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University .................................. 55 Claudia Rosett, Senior Fellow, The Foundation for the Defense of Democ- racies ..................................................................................................................... 61 Michael Soussan, Former Program Coordinator, United Nations Oil-for-Food Program ................................................................................................................ 65 Joseph A. Christoff, Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. General Accounting Office ................................................................................................. 126 LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING The Honorable Henry J. Hyde, a Representative in Congress from the State of Illinois, and Chairman, Committee on International Relations: Prepared statement .............................................................................................................. 3 Howar Ziad: Prepared statement ........................................................................... 11 Danielle Pletka: Prepared statement ..................................................................... 53 John G. Ruggie, Ph.D.: Prepared statement ......................................................... 57 Claudia Rosett: Prepared statement ...................................................................... 63 Michael Soussan: Prepared statement ................................................................... 68 The Honorable Mike Pence, a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana: Article by Ms. Claudia Rosett entitled ‘‘Oil for Terror’’ from The Wall Street Journal, April 28, 2004 ............................................................ 90 Claudia Rosett: Material submitted for the record ............................................... 93 Joseph A. Christoff: Prepared statement ............................................................... 128 APPENDIX The Honorable Nick Smith, a Representative in Congress from the State of Michigan: Prepared statement ........................................................................ 169 The Honorable Ron Paul, a Representative in Congress from the State of Texas: Prepared statement .................................................................................. 170 (III) VerDate Mar 21 2002 11:37 Jul 22, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\FULL\042804\93391.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL VerDate Mar 21 2002 11:37 Jul 22, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\FULL\042804\93391.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL THE UNITED NATIONS OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAM: ISSUES OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2004 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to call, at 10:30 a.m., in Room 2172, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Henry J. Hyde (Chair- man of the Committee) presiding. Chairman HYDE. The Committee will come to order. Many times the Chair has announcements to make, some of which are perfunc- tory, some of which are enormously substantive, and I have one of the latter kind to make. One of our Members who is not here today, and you will under- stand why, Dana Rohrabacher, at 6 o’clock p.m., April 27, his wife Rhonda gave birth to triplets, Annika, Christian and Tristen. So I don’t expect we will hear from Mr. Rohrabacher today, but in absentia we congratulate him and wish him, and especially his wife, well. All right. The Committee will come to order. Of the long list of Saddam Hussein’s crimes, the most relentless were those com- mitted against the Iraqi people. A grim catalog of outrages range from mass killings at one extreme to the needless privation and steady grinding away of hope that formed the context of daily life. The elimination of his regime last year revealed a population ren- dered destitute by 2 decades of dictatorship and the results of the conflicts he initiated against neighboring countries. Unfortunately, efforts by the international community to counter the threat Sad- dam Hussein posed to his neighbors and others unavoidably added to the burden borne by the Iraqi people. In an effort to spare them, especially women and children, from the harshest effects of the em- bargo placed on the regime in the aftermath of Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, the United Nations initiated a program in 1996 to pro- vide the Iraqi people with food, medicine and other aid. The hu- manitarian relief was to be paid for by monitored sales of Iraqi oil. This undertaking came to be known as the Oil-for-Food Program and is credited correctly with saving the lives of millions. Unfortunately, numerous allegations have been made that this humanitarian program was undermined by systematic abuse, in- cluding graft and outright theft, that is estimated in the billions of dollars. The latest and most authoritative report is that released by the General Accounting Office. It estimates that between 1997 and (1) VerDate Mar 21 2002 11:37 Jul 22, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\FULL\042804\93391.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL 2 2002, Saddam’s regime obtained over $10 billion in illegal revenues from the Oil-for-Food Program through illicit surcharges and com- missions as well as smuggling. If these charges prove true, the most obvious victims are those Iraqis who failed to receive needed assistance. But the damage ex- tends much further. The massive windfall resulting from this al- leged organized theft allowed Saddam to maintain his grip on the country, line his pockets, and to make companies and countries dance to his tune with consequences we are still struggling to con- tain. But there is yet a deeper threat. Those who believe that the United Nations and its many programs play a vital role around the world, and I count myself among them, must also fear for the po- tential impact on the reputation and credibility of the U.N. as an institution. The institution’s work in other areas should not be needlessly impeded or placed in doubt by these still-emerging alle- gations. It is, therefore, incumbent upon those with responsibility for these programs, as well as those charged with investigating their failings, to ensure that the truth emerges however unpleasant that task or the results may be. Did U.N. officials responsible for administering the Oil-for-Food Program properly
Recommended publications
  • Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program
    Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Robert E. Ebel E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org March 2010 ISBN 978-0-89206-600-1 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy066001zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program author Robert E. Ebel March 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decision- makers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Danielle Pletka Danielle Pletka Is Senior Vice President for Foreign And
    Ms. Danielle Pletka Danielle Pletka is senior vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where she oversees the Institute’s work on foreign and defense issues. Ms. Pletka writes regularly on national security matters with a special focus on Iran, the Middle East (Syria, Israel, ISIS), and South Asia. She is also an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service. Before joining AEI, Ms. Pletka was a longtime senior professional staff member for the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, where she specialized in the Near East and South Asia as the point person on Middle East, Pakistan, India, and Afghanistan. Ms. Pletka has authored, coauthored, and coedited a variety of studies, monographs, and book chapters, including the report “Tehran Stands Atop the Syria-Iran Alliance” (Atlantic Council, 2017); the chapter “America in Decline” in “Debating the Obama Presidency” (Rowman & Littlefield, 2016); “America vs. Iran: The Competition for the Future of the Middle East” (AEI, 2014); “Iranian Influence in the Levant, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan” (AEI, 2012); “Containing and Deterring a Nuclear Iran” (AEI, 2011); and “Dissent and Reform in the Arab World: Empowering Democrats” (AEI, 2008). A regular guest on television, Ms. Pletka appears frequently on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.” Her broadcast appearances also include CBS News, CNN, C-SPAN, and MSNBC. She has been published in The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Hill, and Politico, among other outlets. She has an M.A. from the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University and a B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Findings from Sunday Talk Show Study
    Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy September 2017 Report on Network Sunday Morning Talk Show Content and Ratings, Comparing 1983, 1999, and 2015 By Matthew A. Baum Kalb Professor of Global Communication Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Program Content 5 3. Guests 7 4. Topics 9 5. Gender Preferences 13 6. Guest Demographics 19 7. Agenda Setting 20 a. Agenda Setting by Members of Congress (1980-2003) 20 b. Agenda Setting Overall (1983, 1999, 2015) 22 8. Conclusion 28 9. Acknowledgments 29 10. Appendix 1: Codebook 30 11. Appendix 2: Examples of Guest Categories 34 12. Appendix 3: Examples of Substance-Process and Politics-Policy Variables 36 2 Executive Summary We studied the content and Nielsen ratings for interviews on the three network Sunday morning talk shows—Meet the Press (henceforth MTP), Face the Nation (FTN), and This Week (TW). We compared three time periods—1983 (MTP, FTN), 1999 (all three shows), and 2015 (all three shows). In order to insure apples-to-apples comparisons, for over time comparisons, we either restricted our analyses to MTP and FTN or analyzed the data with and without TW. For “overall” snapshots we included all three shows (MTP, FTN, TW). Our goals were fourfold: (1) identify any discernable trends in the topics and types of guests featured on the Sunday talk shows, (2) identify any trends in audience ratings, (3) assess whether and to what extent trends in topics and guests correlate with audience ratings, and (4) assess whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances, the Sunday talk shows influence the subsequent news agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Prepared from a Tape Recording.]
    1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION SABAN CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST POLICY TOWARD A NEW IRAN POLICY A SABAN CENTER SYMPOSIUM Tuesday, November 23, 2004 The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. MILLER REPORTING CO., INC. 735 8th STREET, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003-2802 (202) 546-6666 2 [TRANSCRIPT PREPARED FROM A TAPE RECORDING.] MILLER REPORTING CO., INC. 735 8th STREET, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003-2802 (202) 546-6666 3 A G E N D A Introductory Remarks Martin Indyk, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution Opening Address "U.S. Policy Toward Iran in a Second Bush Administration" Danielle Pletka, American Enterprise Institute Panel 1: Iran's Foreign Policy and Motives Moderator: Shaul Bakhash, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution Ray Takeyh, Council on Foreign Relations M. Hadi Semati, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Panel 2: The Lay of the Land: The Threat from Iran and the International Perspective Moderator: Martin Indyk, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution Daniel Byman, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution David Kay, former head of the Iraq Survey Group Philip Gordon, The Brookings Institution Lunch Address "An Alternative Approach to Iran" Ken Pollack, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution MILLER REPORTING CO., INC. 735 8th STREET, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003-2802 (202) 546-6666 4 P R O C E E D I N G S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS MR. INDYK: Welcome to the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution and to the symposium that we are hosting today entitled "Towards a New Iran Policy." We've gathered a group of experts on Iran and on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer on Israel, the UAE and Bahrain
    WTH is going on with peace in the Middle East? Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer on Israel, the UAE and Bahrain Episode #71 | September 29, 2020 | Danielle Pletka, Marc Thiessen, and Amb. Ron Dermer Danielle Pletka: Hi, I'm Danielle Pletka. Marc Thiessen: And I'm Marc Thiessen. Danielle Pletka: he Hell Is Going On? Marc, what the hell is going on? Marc Thiessen: Peace in the Middle East! Danielle Pletka: God I never thought we'd have this podcast. Marc Thiessen: Who would ever believe we'd have a podcast on peace in the Middle East? Danielle Pletka: It really is ridiculous. People always ask me, "So why did you get into the Middle East as a region of study?" And I always say because it's a gift that keeps on giving. The problems there will never be solved. But in fact, it shows, sometimes they get solved. Marc Thiessen: Absolutely they do. First of all, just for a housekeeping note, this is going to be the first of two podcasts on this subject because we have today the Israeli ambassador, Ron Dermer who's joining us and then on the next episode we have the ambassadors of Bahrain and the UAE who are going to join us. So we have the three ambassadors from three countries that have reached this historic deal and it's going to be a pair of epic podcasts. Danielle Pletka: So, you know, there's been a lot of arguing because in Washington of course even peace in the Middle East isn't something that people can agree is a good thing, at least not when Donald Trump is involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Ginsburg's Successor and the History of Supreme Court Vacancies in an Election Year
    WTH is going on with SCOTUS? Ginsburg's successor and the history of Supreme Court vacancies in an election year Episode #70 | September 24, 2020 | Danielle Pletka, Marc Thiessen, and Dan McLaughlin Danielle Pletka: Hi. I'm Danielle Pletka. Marc Thiessen: I'm Marc Thiessen. Danielle Pletka: going on? Marc Thiessen: What the hell is going on is there are charges of hypocrisy in Washington, Dany. Danielle Pletka: No! Wait, wait. Stop the presses. Good god. I am scandalized. Marc Thiessen: Yes. So the Democrats are accusing Mitch McConnell and the Republicans of hypocrisy because they held up the nomination of Merrick Garland to replace Antonin Scalia for the Supreme Court, and said that it should be decided by the voters, but now they are going to rush through a confirmation of President Trump's nominee to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Is that hypocritical, Dany? Danielle Pletka: Look, I guess, having worked on the Senate, I would say that my view of the Senate is if you have the power to do it, and the people elected you to exercise that power, it's more of a dereliction of duty not to. Not only that, but I think we all know, we all know, that if the shoe were on the other foot... Marc Thiessen: Amen. Danielle Pletka: ... this would be exactly the same. Chuck Schumer with his pious adherence to precedent, which, by the way of course, he has totally done a switcheroo on because he made the exact opposite argument, so does everybody look a little bit two-faced? Kinda.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Conservatism and Foreign Policy
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2009 Neo-conservatism and foreign policy Ted Boettner University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Boettner, Ted, "Neo-conservatism and foreign policy" (2009). Master's Theses and Capstones. 116. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/116 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Neo-Conservatism and Foreign Policy BY TED BOETTNER BS, West Virginia University, 2002 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science September, 2009 UMI Number: 1472051 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI" UMI Microform 1472051 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Oil for Food Program Hearing Committee
    UNITED NATIONS OIL FOR FOOD PROGRAM HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND AIR QUALITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 8, 2004 Serial No. 108–106 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 95–451PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 10:36 Oct 12, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 95451.TXT HCOM1 PsN: HCOM1 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE JOE BARTON, Texas, Chairman W.J. ‘‘BILLY’’ TAUZIN, Louisiana JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan RALPH M. HALL, Texas Ranking Member MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CLIFF STEARNS, Florida RICK BOUCHER, Virginia PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey CHRISTOPHER COX, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio NATHAN DEAL, Georgia BART GORDON, Tennessee RICHARD BURR, North Carolina PETER DEUTSCH, Florida ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia ANNA G. ESHOO, California BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming BART STUPAK, Michigan JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona GENE GREEN, Texas CHARLES W. ‘‘CHIP’’ PICKERING, KAREN MCCARTHY, Missouri Mississippi, Vice Chairman TED STRICKLAND, Ohio VITO FOSSELLA, New York DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado STEVE BUYER, Indiana LOIS CAPPS, California GEORGE RADANOVICH, California MICHAEL F.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America
    Issue No. 1, Winter 2020 Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America A New Year and New Opportunities By AEI President Robert Doar A new year offers the opportunity to set priorities. Our highest priorities at AEI come from our institutional commitment to freedom: We believe in free people, free markets, and limited government. We promote the rule of law, economic opportunity for all, and institutions of civil society that make our freedom possible. And we stand for a strong American role in the world. These priorities guide how we want our scholarship to move the public debate; they relate to our philosophical predisposition. And they are well-known. Lately, I have been thinking about two other priorities that are less discussed but vitally important to the Institute and our scholars’ work. These two priorities are not so much about where we want our country to be headed but rather how we want to do our research—the intellectual environment AEI must foster so that our scholars can do their best and most effective work. That intellectual environment must be grounded in two simple values: independence of thought and the competition of ideas. So long as they remain consistent with our overarching philosophy and maintain high standards of quality, our scholars engage in their work free of control from anyone, including management. Within their areas of expertise, our scholars study, write, and say what they want to study, write, and say. We recruit great thinkers and writers with established records, and we give them the freedom to apply their skills however they see fit.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassadors of UAE and Bahrain on Their New Peace with Israel
    WTH is going on with peace in the Middle East II? Ambassadors of UAE and Bahrain on their new peace with Israel Episode #72 | October 1, 2020 | Danielle Pletka, Marc Thiessen, Amb. Yousef Al Otaiba, and Amb. Shaikh Abdullah bin Rashid bin Abdullah Al Khalifa Danielle Pletka: Hi, I'm Danielle Pletka. Marc Thiessen: I'm Marc Thiessen. Danielle Pletka: going on? Marc Thiessen: Well, we've got part two of our podcast series this week on the historic peace deals with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain and Israel and the United States. This is, as you've said, one of the most seismic events in the history of the Middle East. And maybe it's because of who brought it about and people who don't like him, or maybe it's because we've moved on to the fight over the Supreme Court, and we're in the middle of an election. But this deserves a lot more attention than it's gotten. We've got the ambassadors of the UAE and Bahrain here today. Can you ever have imagined, when we started this podcast, that we'd have the ambassadors of Israel, UAE and Bahrain with us on the podcast, talking about peace? Danielle Pletka: As I said in the interview with the Israeli ambassador as well, this is truly ... It's a watershed. And it is a mark of a change in the Middle East that I don't think anyone would have predicted. And that the professional class of Middle East peace processors has never managed to achieve.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden's Strategic Turn to China: an Assessment of U.S.-China Competition and Cooperation
    Biden’s Strategic Turn to China: An Assessment of U.S.-China Competition and Cooperation 19 Biden’s Strategic Turn to China: An Assessment of U.S.-China Competition and Cooperation Kuo-hsiang Sun Associate Professor, Department of International Affairs and Business, Nanhua University Abstract U.S. President Joe Biden and his government officials have put forward a hard line against China in their tenure, describing the authoritarian government as an economic and security challenge to the United States, one which required a more strategic and calculated approach than that of the Donald Trump’s administration. This article will focus on the Biden’s administration strategic turn to China. The following sections will give an overview of the similarities and differences between Biden and Trump’s China policies, U.S. strategic competition and cooperation with China within the rules-based order, U.S. trade policy with China guided by a “foreign policy for the middle class,” and concluding remarks with a future development of U.S.-China relations. Finally, it suggests that for any future U.S. toward China strategy to be effective, it must above all be operationalized rather than merely declared. Keywords: Biden Administration, China Policy, Competition, Cooperation, Rules-Based Order I. Introduction U.S. President Joe Biden and his government officials have put forward a hard line against China, describing the authoritarian government as an economic and security challenge to the United States, one which requires a more strategic and calculated approach than that of the Donald Trump’s administration. In his first major foreign policy speech, to the Munich Security Conference (MSC) on February 10, Biden emphasized a firm approach to the country’s three main 20 Taiwan Strategists No.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Middle East?
    AUSTRALIA/ISRAEL REVIEW VOLUME 45 No. 10 OCTOBER 2020 AUSTRALIA/ISRAEL & JEWISH AFFAIRS COUNCIL A NEW MIDDLE EAST? How the aftermath of the UAE- Bahrain-Israel peace deals could transform the region THE “SNAPBACK” CRISIS TERROR REVISITED CONSPIRACY DOWN ISLAMIST HATE UNDER REVEALED The dispute over renewed UN How the Second Inti- fada, which began 20 The QAnon movement An exposé of the sanctions on Iran will have profound years ago, reshaped makes a splash in ugly rhetoric of international implications ........... PAGE 22 Israel .............PAGE 31 Australia ........PAGE 24 Hizb ut-Tahrir Aus- tralia ............. PAGE 27 NAME OF SECTION WITH COMPLIMENTS AND BEST WISHES FROM GANDEL GROUP CHADSTONE SHOPPING CENTRE 1341 DANDENONG ROAD CHADSTONE VIC 3148 TEL: (03) 8564 1222 FAX: (03) 8564 1333 2 AIR – October 2020 AUSTRALIA/ISRAEL VOLUME 45 No. 10 REVIEW OCTOBER 2020 EDITOR’S NOTE NAME OF SECTION his AIR edition focuses on the potentially transformative effect for the whole Middle ON THE COVER TEast of the decision by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain to sign peace (L-R) Israeli Prime Minister Bin- and normalisation agreements with Israel. yamin Netanyahu, US President Washington Institute scholar David Makovksy looks in detail at what those peace Donald Trump, Bahrain Foreign deals actually say, while Amotz Asa-El explores the likelihood that other regional states Affairs Minister Sheikh Khalid will soon also normalise their relations with Israel. In addition, American expert Dani- Bin Ahmed Al-Khalifa and UAE elle Pletka examines Palestinian options now that their traditional Arab supporters are Foreign Affairs Minister Sheikh abandoning their long-standing boycott of Israel, and Khaled Abu Toameh documents Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al how fundamentally Arab media discourse about Israel is changing.
    [Show full text]