DOCSLIB.ORG

9 February 2011 Mr G Sector Addleshaw Goddard LLP Milton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9 February 2011 Mr G Sector Addleshaw Goddard LLP Milton 9 February 2011 Our Ref: APP/N5660/A/10/2123877 Mr G Sector Your Ref: 09/01520/FUL Addleshaw Goddard LLP Milton Gate 60 Chiswell Street LONDON EC1Y 4AG Dear Mr Sector TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY VAUXHALL BONDWAY LTD AT 69-71 BONDWAY, VAUXHALL, LONDON SW8 1SQ APPLICATION: REF 09/01520/FUL 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Mr Alan Novitzky, BArch(Hons) MA(RCA) PhD RIBA, who held a public inquiry on dates between 20 July and 18 August 2010 into your client's appeal against a decision of the London Borough of Lambeth Council (‘the Council’) to refuse planning permission for: The demolition of existing buildings on site and the erection of a 42 storey building (149m) plus 2 basement levels below ground to provide a mixed use development comprising commercial units (flexible Use Class A1, A2, A3 and A4) of 275sqm GEA at ground floor, commercial units (Use Class B1) of 5,205sqm GEA at ground, first, second and third floor, 671sqm residential amenity space at thirty-sixth floor and 376 residential units at fourth to fortieth floors, two levels of plant at forty-first to forty-second floors, 25 car parking spaces and 22 motorbike parking spaces located in the basements, 568 cycle parking spaces (360 located in the basements, 156 located in storage units on floors four to sixteen and 52 at grade), refuse storage, public realm improvements / landscaping at street level and the formation of new vehicular access from Bondway / realigned vehicular access from Parry Street at 69-71 Bondway, Vauxhall, London SW8 1SQ in accordance with application number 09/01520/FUL, dated 15 May 2009. Department for Communities and Local Government Tel: 0303 444 1630 Julian Pitt, Decision Officer Email: [email protected] Planning Central Casework Division, 1/H1, Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU 2. On 12 March 2010, the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 to Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The reason for recovery is that the appeal involves proposals for residential development of over 150 units which would significantly impact on the Government’s objective to secure a better balance between housing demand and supply and create high quality, sustainable, mixed and inclusive communities and proposals which could have an adverse impact on the outstanding universal value, integrity, authenticity and significance of a World Heritage Site. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions and agrees with his recommendation. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report. Procedural Matters 4. The Secretary of State has had regard to the error in the amount of commercial floorspace included in the application’s description of the proposal but is satisfied that the matter was discussed at the Inquiry. Like the Inspector, he has accepted the change because he considers that it is minor and would not prejudice the interests of any party or cause them an injustice (IR3-4). 5. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s assessment of the environmental information submitted with the application, as set out at IR5 – 7. In reaching his decision, the Secretary of State has taken into account the Environmental Statement and further environmental information submitted under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999. The Secretary of State is content that the Environmental Statement complies with the above regulations and that sufficient information has been provided for him to assess the environmental impact of the application. Matters arising after the close of the inquiry 6. Following the close of the Inquiry, the Secretary of State received the written representations listed at Annex A to this letter. The Secretary of State has taken account of these representations in his determination of this appeal but, as they did not raise any new matters that would affect his decision, he has not considered it necessary to circulate them to all parties. Copies of the correspondence can be made available upon written request to the address at the foot of the first page of this letter. Policy considerations 7. In determining the appeal, the Secretary of State has had regard to section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 which requires that proposals be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 8. In this case, the development plan comprises the 2008 London Plan (LP), saved policies of the 2007 Lambeth Unitary Development Plan (UDP), and the Lambeth LDF Core Strategy (CS), which was adopted after the Inquiry on 19 January 2011 (IR15 – 17). The Secretary of State considers that the policies most relevant to his determination of this appeal are those listed by the Inspector at IR15, excluding those saved policies of the UDP that have been superseded by the CS, and CS policies S3, S9 and PN2. He does not consider that there has been any material changes in relevant policies between the draft Core Strategy considered at the Inquiry and the adopted version to the extent that it would affect his decision or require him to refer back to parties for further representations prior to reaching his decision. 9. Other material considerations which the Secretary of State has taken into account include the national planning policy statements, planning policy guidance notes and circulars listed at paragraph 5.1 of the Statement of Common Ground (SOCG, Inquiry Document CD1/2), the planning and design guidance documents listed at paragraphs 5.4 and 5.5 of the SOCG and the Lambeth Supplementary Planning Guidance documents, local strategies and reports listed at paragraphs 5.6 and 5.7 of the SOCG. He has also taken into account the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations, which came into force on 6 April 2010. 10. The Secretary of State has taken into account emerging policy documents including the Vauxhall Nine Elms Battersea Opportunity Area Planning Framework Consultation Draft (OAPF), the Vauxhall Area Draft Supplementary Planning Document and the consultation draft replacement London Plan (IR16 and 18). As these documents are still in draft form and may be subject to change, he has afforded their policies limited weight. 11. In determining the appeal, the Secretary of State has had regard to the impact of the proposed development on the settings of the listed buildings referred to by the Inspector at IR595 – 609. In accordance with section 16(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, he has paid special regard to the desirability of preserving the listed buildings or their settings or any features of special architectural or historic interest which they may possess. Given that the appeal proposal might affect the Conservation Areas referred to by the Inspector at IR610 – 625, he has also paid special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of those areas, as required by section 72(1) of the same Act. Main issues 12. The Secretary of State considers that the main issues in this case are those set out in Section 5 of the Inspector’s report, being: a) PPS1 and sustainable development matters; b) PPS3 and housing matters; c) PPS4 and sustainable economic growth; d) PPS5 and the historic environment; e) PPG13 and transport matters; f) PPG17 and open space, sport and recreation matters; g) The relationship of the proposal to the development plan; h) Conditions; and i) The submitted Planning Obligation. PPS1: Delivering Sustainable Development Sustainable Development 13. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s reasoning and conclusions with regard to whether the proposal would deliver sustainable development, as set out at IR527 – 539. He agrees that the proposals generally accord with the aims of PPS1 and the development plan regarding sustainable development and would accord with LP Policy 4A.3 and UDP Policy 35 (IR539). Design 14. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s reasoning and conclusions, as set out at IR540 – 557, on the design of the appeal proposal. He has had regard to the advice in PPS1 (IR540) and agrees that the importance of well planned public spaces is echoed in development plan policy (IR541, UDP Policy 77 having been superseded by Core Strategy PN2). He agrees that the proposals pack a great deal onto the site, which would be commendable in such a sustainable location provided no unacceptable harm were to arise (IR542). He considers that the design of the proposed tower has the merits set out at IR544 – 545, but agrees with the Inspector that its greatest shortcoming concerns the relationship of the building to its immediate surroundings. He agrees that the well planned public open spaces that bring people together, and which PPS1 advises should be incorporated, are absent, and that the proposals fail to provide sufficient opportunities for pedestrian movement linked to the wider public realm for it to succeed (IR546). 15. The Secretary of State agrees that the proposals involve great density and site coverage without the provision or existing availability of complementary public space (IR548). He shares the Inspector’s view that the materialisation of the public open space indicated in the draft SPD, or an equivalent, cannot be guaranteed for a considerable time, or at all, and that if it were not to materialise then unacceptable consequences would arise (IR549).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf
    Inscribed6 CONTENTS 1 1. AVIATION 33 2. MILITARY 59 3. NAVAL 67 4. ROYALTY, POLITICIANS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES 180 5. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 195 6. HIGH LATITUDES, INCLUDING THE POLES 206 7. MOUNTAINEERING 211 8. SPACE EXPLORATION 214 9. GENERAL TRAVEL SECTION 1. AVIATION including books from the libraries of Douglas Bader and “Laddie” Lucas. 1. [AITKEN (Group Captain Sir Max)]. LARIOS (Captain José, Duke of Lerma). Combat over Spain. Memoirs of a Nationalist Fighter Pilot 1936–1939. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition. 8vo., cloth, pictorial dust jacket. London, Neville Spearman. nd (1966). £80 A presentation copy, inscribed on the half title page ‘To Group Captain Sir Max AitkenDFC. DSO. Let us pray that the high ideals we fought for, with such fervent enthusiasm and sacrifice, may never be allowed to perish or be forgotten. With my warmest regards. Pepito Lerma. May 1968’. From the dust jacket: ‘“Combat over Spain” is one of the few first-hand accounts of the Spanish Civil War, and is the only one published in England to be written from the Nationalist point of view’. Lerma was a bomber and fighter pilot for the duration of the war, flying 278 missions. Aitken, the son of Lord Beaverbrook, joined the RAFVR in 1935, and flew Blenheims and Hurricanes, shooting down 14 enemy aircraft. Dust jacket just creased at the head and tail of the spine. A formidable Vic formation – Bader, Deere, Malan. 2. [BADER (Group Captain Douglas)]. DEERE (Group Captain Alan C.) DOWDING Air Chief Marshal, Lord), foreword. Nine Lives. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition.
    [Show full text]
  • BUXTON MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN, VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS, City of Westminster - 1066151 | Historic England
    18/09/2020 BUXTON MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN, VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS, City of Westminster - 1066151 | Historic England BUXTON MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN, VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS Overview Heritage Category: Listed Building Grade: II* List Entry Number: 1066151 Date first listed: 05-Feb-1970 Date of most recent amendment: 21-Dec-2007 Statutory Address: BUXTON MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN, VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS, MILLBANK https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1066151 1/4 18/09/2020 BUXTON MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN, VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS, City of Westminster - 1066151 | Historic England Map © Crown Copyright and database right 2020. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100024900. © British Crown and SeaZone Solutions Limited 2020. All rights reserved. Licence number 102006.006. Use of this data is subject to Terms and Conditions (https://historicengland.org.uk/terms/website-terms-conditions/) . The above map is for quick reference purposes only and may not be to scale. For a copy of the full scale map, please see the attached PDF - 1066151.pdf (http://mapservices.HistoricEngland.org.uk/printwebservicehle/StatutoryPrint.svc/422559/HLE_A4L_Grade|HLE_A3L_Grade.pd The PDF will be generated from our live systems and may take a few minutes to download depending on how busy our servers are. We apologise for this delay. This copy shows the entry on 18-Sep-2020 at 14:26:41. Location Statutory Address: BUXTON MEMORIAL FOUNTAIN, VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS, MILLBANK The building or site itself may lie within the boundary of more than one authority. County:
    [Show full text]
  • National Holocaust Memorial & Learning Centre
    NATIONAL HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL & LEARNING CENTRE PROOF OF EVIDENCE (APPENDICES) HERITAGE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 CALL-IN INQUIRY DR CHRIS MIELE IHBC MRTPI APPLICATION REFERENCE: 19/00114/FULL SEPTEMBER 2020 Page 1 of 54 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1.0 CM LIST OF PUBLICATIONS APPENDIX 2.0 VISUAL MATERIAL APPENDIX 3.0 EXTRACT FROM SUPREME COURT VOLUME APPENDIX 4.0 COMMENTS ON DR GERHOLD’S SUBMISSION 2 Page 2 of 54 APPENDIX 01 CM LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 4 Page 3 of 54 ■ “The Battle for Westminster Hall”, Architectural Published Works History (British Society of Architectural Historians) ■ ‘The Mystery of Ashpitel’s Notebook, Georgian vol. 41 (1998), pp. 220-244. Group Journal, 2016. ■ ‘Robert Adam, Marlborough House and Mrs ■ ‘E A Freeman and the Culture of Gothic Revival’ in Fitzherbert: “The First Architect of the World in Bremner and Conlin, Making History (OUP, 2016) Brighton”’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. ■ ‘Scenes of Clerical Life: the Young Scott’, in G G 136 (1998), pp. 149-175. Scott RA, ed by P Barnwell (Shaun Tyas, ■ “Real Antiquity and the Ancient Object”, in The forthcoming). Study of the Past in the Victorian Age, ed. V Brand, ■ ‘Community Heritage’ and other Victorian Myths: intro. By Chris Brooks, Oxbow Monographs no. 73 Reflections on the English Experience’, ed. Melanie (1998), pp. 103-125. Hall, The History of Preservation: International ■ Morris on Architecture, ed by C Miele (Sheffield, Perspectives (Ashurst, 2013). 1997). A collection of William Morris’ lectures on ■ Forgotten, Lost and Restored, joint author building and architecture, with a critical (Hackney Society, 2012). introduction and annotations. ■ ‘Gothic Sign.
    [Show full text]
  • Protest Contingencies Timeline.Pdf
    1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 18701880 1890 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 War in Iraq & Keynisian economics Rise of neo-liberal economics Chicago school of economics (USA) + Thatcherism (UK) Political requirement Traditional practice Afghanistan The Industrial Revolution End of Keynesian economics Global The 7/11 public protest as a form of democratic a critical spatial practice an evaluative Oil crisis - global CNN (24 hour news Sky News (24 hour news CNN (24 hour realtime news representation - that of popular sovereignty attitude to a variety of social and spatial International Monetary Fund issues. A series of tactics which are utilised The Battle chanel) launched (USA) coverage) launched coverage) First Gulf War (USA) World Bank Group Reformation English Bill price of oil increases attacks in Economic crash Global Occupy Movement PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC to combat existing hegemonic structures English of Rights of Trafalgar WWI WWII September 19–28, 2000 London 1980 1989 1990/1 Particularly relevant in light of today's political Civil war consinsus present in mainstream politics Particulary relevant in light of the legislative 1066 1689 1805 1914 1918 1939 1945 1955 Vietnam War 1975 2001 2003 2005 restrictions placed on protest since 1970s IRA: Bishopsgate bombing Gunpowder Great fire IRA: Brighton Hotel plot of London Battle of Hastings, start of Act of the Union bombing IRA: Docklands bombing 2007 2010 Antagonism Right to the city 1973 Trade union Chantal Mouffe Lefebvre, Harvey 1605 1666 1707 1984 1993 1996 the middle ages (England) Occupy Wall Street Crash Stock Market Crash attacks in New Wall Street South Sea company Bengal 'The 'The 'The 'The 'The Panic' Black 'The Black Black 1996 York (9/11) Eurozone Economic Bubble Bubble Panic' Panic' Panic' Panic' USA: FIRST GLOBAL Friday Painic' Rights of commoning UK USA USA UK ECONOMIC CRASH USA USA Monday Wednesday Stock Market downturn IRA: Manchester bombing sovereignty crisis ..
    [Show full text]
  • London Gardens Trust
    Slide 1 London Gardens Trust Victoria Tower Gardens Helen Monger Director And Hal Moggridge Patron December 2020 Hello everyone and thank you for coming along today – sit tight whilst I tell you the story of the campaign to protect VTG so far. I want to start by thanking the Gardens Trust for inviting me to speak to you today as the campaign is not yet over and there may be things you can do to help us, even now. I am joined for this talk by our wonderful patron and an award-winning landscape architect Hal Moggridge who will provide you with some vital information about the clever design intricacies of the site in question and how this was presented at the Planning Inquiry. You will also hear about our battle in the Courts. The two are separate but parallel processes in an endeavour to save this historic public park. Slide 2 London Gardens Trust Celebrate Purpose • Open Garden Squares Weekend Champion • Walks, tours & talks • Thanking volunteers • Responding to • Engaging and planning applications collaborating with • Campaigns others • Story telling & • Events & sharing narratives • Publishing knowledge • Protecting & Cultivate supporting • Learning and • Influencing presence training • Research and interpretation • Curiosity and discovery • Academic and community I am Helen Monger. I was appointed as the first Director of the London Gardens Trust. The Trust is a County Gardens Trust affiliated to the Gardens Trust. As a Trust, we have summarised our purpose in three core Strategic Aims: Celebrate – Events (including OGSW) Cultivate – Research supporting our Inventory and Champion – Responding to Planning Applications. All our work falls under these headings and is intrinsically linked as will be demonstrated by this case study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty to Remove Statues of Wrongdoers 1
    The Duty To Remove Statues Of Wrongdoers 1 The Duty to Remove Statues of Wrongdoers HELEN FROWE Stockholm University ABSTRACT This paper argues that public statues of persons typically express a positive evaluative attitude towards the subject. It also argues that states have duties to re- pudiate their own historical wrongdoing, and to condemn other people’s serious wrongdoing. Both duties are incompatible with retaining public statues of people who perpetrated serious rights violations. Hence, a person’s being a serious rights violator is a suffi cient condition for a state’s having a duty to remove a public statue of that person. I argue that this applies no less in the case of the ‘morally ambiguous’ wrongdoer, who both accomplishes signifi cant goods and perpetrates serious rights violations. The duty to remove a statue is a defeasible duty: like most duties, it can be defeated by lesser-evil considerations. If removing a statue would, for example, spark a violent riot that would risk unjust harm to lots of people, the duty to remove could be outweighed by the duty not to foreseeably cause unjust harm. This would provide a lesser-evil justifi cation for keeping the statue. But it matters that the duty to remove is outweighed, rather than negated, by these consequences. Unlike when a duty is negated, one still owes something in cases of outweighing. And it especially matters that it is outweighed by the predicted consequences of wrongful behaviour by others. Volume 7, Issue 3 2 HELEN FROWE 1. INTRODUCTION This paper argues that if someone perpetrates serious rights violations, then this gives the state grounds to remove public statues of that person.
    [Show full text]
  • William Blake and His Circle Part III: Commercial Book Engravings
    708 William Blake and His Circle Part III: Commercial Book Engravings Part III COMMERCIAL BOOK ENGRAVINGS528 Section A ILLUSTRATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS529 ADAMS, Michael New Royal Geographical Magazine (1793, 1794) 1793 NEW LOCATIONS: British Library, Cambridge, Dalhousie, Union Theological Seminary 1794 NEW LOCATIONS: Cambridge (in 48 parts; also reproduced in Primary Source Microfilms), Leeds ALLEN, Charles A New and Improved History of England (1797) TITLE: A NEW AND IMPROVED │ HISTORY OF ENGLAND, │ FROM │ THE INVASION OF JULIUS CÆSAR TO THE END OF THE │ THIRTY-SEVENTH 528 Many of the new locations for books with Blake's commercial engravings after Fuseli below, particularly those in Swiss libraries, derive from the admirable details in David Weinglass, Prints ... After Fuseli (1994). 529 In 2010 for the first time I record contemporary references to separately issued prints by Blake.After 2015, I no longer record post-1863 sales of unremarkable copies of books with Blake's commercial engravings. For voluminous records of these, see Robert N. Essick, "Blake in the Marketplace", Blake, (2016 ff.) 708 William Blake and His Circle 709 Part III: Commercial Book Engravings YEAR OF THE REIGN │ OF KING GEORGE THE THIRD [i.e., 1797]. │ - │By CHARLES ALLEN, A.M.│ AUTHOR OF THE ROMAN HISTORY &c. │ - │ THE SECOND EDITION, │ EMBELLISHED WITH FOUR COPPER PLATES, AND A CHRONOLO- │ GICAL CHART OF THE REVOLUTIONS IN GREAT BRITAIN. │ - │ Concluding with a short but comprehensive Historical View │ of Europe, from the abolition of the Monarchical form of │ government in France; the military and naval operations, │ with the conquests and revolutions in Italy to the │ peace of Udina.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slavery Connections of Northington Grange
    The slavery connections of Northington Grange Dr Laurence Brown School of Arts, Histories and Cultures University of the Manchester June 2010 2 “A real and material source of wealth and power” Alexander Baring on Britain’s slave colonies in the Caribbean (1831) 3 This report was commissioned in November 2008 as part of a project to explore the slavery connections of four historic properties in the stewardship of English Heritage. Archival research was carried out on Bolsover Castle, Brodsworth Hall, Marble Hill House, and Northington Grange to examine the impact of slavery-generated wealth on the development of these properties. The research follows the 2007 survey by Miranda Kaufmann on the family history of 33 English Heritage properties and their slavery connections. Using databases on slave voyages and slave compensation, Kaufmann’s study focused on those who owned property in slave colonies, held government office in such colonies, invested in slaving or traded in slave produced goods, were engaged in abolitionist debates or legal decisions on slavery, or who owned black servants. The aims of this report are to provide more detailed information on the economic, social, and cultural connections that linked Northington Grange to Atlantic slavery. The report examines the relative importance of slave-generated wealth in the fortunes of Northington Grange’s occupants and how these changed over time. It then details the extent to which wealth from slavery shaped the physical development of the estate and its aesthetic design. 4 Contents 1) Executive summary 2) The Henley family and the construction of Northington Grange 3) Shanley v.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United Kingdom Holocaust Memorial and Learning
    UNITED KINGDOM HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL AND LEARNING CENTRE APPLICATION BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT PINS REF. APP/X5990/V/19/3240661 CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE THORNEY ISLAND SOCIETY/SAVE VICTORIA TOWER GARDENS & THE LONDON GARDENS TRUST Introduction 1. For the many reasons which follow the Thorney Island Society/Save Victoria Tower Gardens and the London Gardens Trust respectfully request that planning permission be refused for the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre proposed to be located in Victoria Tower Gardens. In summary, the proposals before the inquiry would cause substantial harm to the settings of numerous designated heritage assets of the very highest value and significance. They would result in both the loss and transformation of substantial areas of valuable and valued open space in an area of already low provision. They would be likely to result in the loss of fine mature trees which contribute so substantially to the quality and value of Victoria Tower Gardens and the setting of the Palace of Westminster and the World Heritage Site. 2. Vote of thanks: But before getting into the substance of my submissions, I want to record a vote of earnest thanks to the Planning Inspectorate support staff who have contributed so substantially to the successful smooth running of this virtual inquiry event. They have worked tirelessly throughout the proceedings – and very often at night and on weekends – but always with great patience and good humour despite all the demands placed upon them. I am sure I speak for all those who have appeared before this inquiry in thanking them or their most welcome efforts on behalf of us all.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to an Application for Planning Permission and Listed
    Response to an application for planning permission and listed building consent to relocate the Memorial to Emmeline Pankhurst and Christabel Pankhurst, Victoria Tower Gardens For the Curator’s Office at the Palace of Westminster July 2018 ii Donald Insall Associates | Memorial to Emmeline Pankhurst and Christabel Pankhurst, Victoria Tower Gardens Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 The Memorial and its Legal status 2 3.0 Summary of Statutory Protection 3 4.0 History of the Memorial to Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst in Victoria Tower Gardens 5 5.0 Description of the Memorial and its Setting 21 6.0 The Wider Context of Memorials to the Campaign for Women’s Suffrage 24 7.0 The Significance of the Memorial to Emmeline Pankhurst 27 8.0 Commentary on the Proposal to Relocate the Memorial 30 9.0 Conclusion 37 Appendix I – Planning Policy 38 Appendix II - Statutory List Descriptions 47 Appendix III – Sources of Reference and Bibliography 57 Appendix IV- List of Plates and Endnotes 59 Contact Information Hannah Parham (Director) E: [email protected] T: 020 7245 9888 Sarah Bridger (Senior Historic Buildings Advisor) E: [email protected] T: 020 7245 9888 London Office 12 Devonshire Street London, W1G 7AB www.insall-architects.co.uk This report and all intellectual property rights in it and arising from it are the property of or are under licence to Donald Insall Associates or the client. Neither the whole nor any part of this report, nor any drawing, plan, other document or any information contained within it may be reproduced in any form without the prior written consent of Donald Insall Associates or the client as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Transmission of the Celtic Culture Trough the Shakespearean Repertory Celine Savatier-Lahondès
    Transtextuality, (Re)sources and Transmission of the Celtic Culture Trough the Shakespearean Repertory Celine Savatier-Lahondès To cite this version: Celine Savatier-Lahondès. Transtextuality, (Re)sources and Transmission of the Celtic Culture Trough the Shakespearean Repertory. Linguistics. University of Stirling, 2019. English. NNT : 2019CLFAL012. tel-02439401 HAL Id: tel-02439401 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02439401 Submitted on 14 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. University of Stirling – Université Clermont Auvergne Transtextuality, (Re)sources and Transmission of the Celtic Culture Through the Shakespearean Repertory THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PH.D) AND DOCTEUR DES UNIVERSITÉS (DOCTORAT) BY CÉLINE SAVATIER LAHONDÈS Co-supervised by: Professor Emeritus John Drakakis Professor Emeritus Danièle Berton-Charrière Department of Arts and Humanities IHRIM Clermont UMR 5317 University of Stirling Faculté de Lettres et Sciences Humaines Members of the Jury:
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Tower Gardens, Millbank in the City of Westminster Planning Application No
    planning report GLA/5035/01 4 March 2019 Victoria Tower Gardens, Millbank in the City of Westminster planning application no. 19/00114/FULL Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Installation of the United Kingdom Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre including excavation to provide a basement and basement mezzanine for the learning centre; erection of a single storey entrance pavilion; re- provision of the Horseferry Playground and refreshments kiosk; repositioning of the Spicer Memorial; new hard and soft landscaping and lighting around the site; and all ancillary and associated works. The applicant The applicant is the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and the architects are Adjaye Associates and Ron Arad Architects. Strategic issues summary Land use: The provision of a United Kingdom Holocaust Memorial and integrated Learning Centre, which would result in wide-ranging educational, cultural and societal benefits to residents of London and the United Kingdom as a whole, would align with the broad strategic aspirations for the role and growth of London, as set out within the London Plan and the draft London Plan. The loss of open space is offset by improvements to public realm across the site and the wider public benefits of the proposals (paragraphs 17 to 27). Urban design: The proposed design of the Holocaust Memorial, along with that of the entrance pavilion and the memorial courtyard, is of a high quality. Conditions should be secured to ensure the use of high quality materials and effective maintenance of the site and surrounds (paragraphs 28 to 40).
    [Show full text]