Costa Head Wave Farm Limited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Costa Head Wave Farm Limited Costa Head Wave Farm Limited Scoping Report Offshore Project Infrastructure Rev Prepared Checked Approved Date of LW & PT LF, KS, JT & PC PC & KS May 2012 0.1 By By By Issue Document Reference: LM000035-REP-SCO-CHWFL Costa Head Wave Farm – Offshore Scoping Report Page 3 of 155 CONTENTS COSTA HEAD WAVE FARM LIMITED - REQUEST FOR SCOPING OPINION.................... 7 Glossary of Terms................................................................................................................... 9 Acronyms .............................................................................................................................. 13 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................17 1.1 Background..........................................................................................................................17 1.2 Document Purpose..............................................................................................................19 1.3 Development Strategy.........................................................................................................19 1.4 Development Overview.......................................................................................................23 1.5 Document Structure ............................................................................................................24 2 Approach to Scoping and EIA........................................................................................ 25 2.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................25 2.2 EIA Scoping and Navigational PHA ......................................................................................25 2.3 Consideration of Design Options (Rochdale Envelope).......................................................26 2.4 Survey Deploy and Monitor Policy ......................................................................................26 2.5 Approach to Onshore Application.......................................................................................26 3 Policy and Legislative Context....................................................................................... 29 3.1 The Need for Renewable Energy.........................................................................................29 3.2 Energy Policy........................................................................................................................29 3.3 Marine Planning Framework ...............................................................................................30 3.4 Terrestrial Planning Framework ..........................................................................................32 3.5 Environmental Impact Assessment Legislation...................................................................33 3.6 Habitats Directive ................................................................................................................34 3.6.1 Habitats Regulations Appraisal and Appropriate Assessment ............................................34 3.6.2 European Protected Species ................................................................................................35 3.7 Consent Applications...........................................................................................................35 4 Development Description............................................................................................... 37 4.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................37 4.2 Development Infrastructure................................................................................................38 4.3 Construction and Installation ..............................................................................................45 4.4 Commissioning ....................................................................................................................47 Document Reference: LM000035-REP-SCO-CHWFL Costa Head Wave Farm – Offshore Scoping Report Page 4 of 155 4.5 Operation and Maintenance ...............................................................................................48 4.6 Ports, Harbours and other Local Facilities...........................................................................49 4.7 Decommissioning ................................................................................................................ 49 5 Physical Characterisation and Impact Assessment....................................................... 51 5.1 Introduction to Baseline Characterisation and Impact Assessment ...................................51 5.2 Physical Processes and Sediment Dynamics........................................................................51 5.3 Air and Climate ....................................................................................................................55 5.4 Sediments and Water Quality .............................................................................................57 6 Biological Characterisation and Impact Assessment..................................................... 59 6.1 Intertidal and Benthic habitats............................................................................................59 6.2 Fish and Shellfish Resources................................................................................................63 6.3 Marine mammals and reptiles.............................................................................................69 6.4 Ornithology..........................................................................................................................74 6.5 Conservation........................................................................................................................79 7 Human Activities ............................................................................................................ 84 7.1 Population and Development..............................................................................................84 7.2 Commercial Fisheries...........................................................................................................85 7.3 Shipping and Navigation......................................................................................................90 7.4 Ports and Harbours..............................................................................................................92 7.5 Tourism and Recreation ......................................................................................................93 7.6 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage .....................................................................................97 7.7 Landscape and Seascape ...................................................................................................101 7.8 Other Sea Users.................................................................................................................103 8 Cumulative and In-Combination Impacts..................................................................... 107 9 Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................................ 113 9.1 Approach to Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................................113 9.2 Pre‐scoping Consultation...................................................................................................113 9.3 Stakeholder Identification .................................................................................................114 9.4 Communication and Engagement Strategy.......................................................................114 9.5 Public Consultation............................................................................................................116 10 Summary and Conclusions ...................................................................................... 117 10.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................117 Document Reference: LM000035-REP-SCO-CHWFL Costa Head Wave Farm – Offshore Scoping Report Page 5 of 155 10.2 Consultation ......................................................................................................................117 10.3 Environmental Impact Assessment ...................................................................................117 10.4 Mitigation and Monitoring Techniques.............................................................................117 10.5 Scoping Questions .............................................................................................................118 11 References............................................................................................................... 119 Appendix A Content of Environmental Statement.......................................................... 127 Appendix B Strategic Research and Studies................................................................. 129 Appendix C Stakeholder List.......................................................................................... 135 Appendix D Approach to HRA Screening (Marine)........................................................ 143 Appendix E Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA)...........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
    Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather).
    [Show full text]
  • Midnight Train to Georgemas Report Final 08-12-2017
    Midnight Train to Georgemas 08/12/2017 Reference number 105983 MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner HITRANS Project Midnight Train to Georgemas Study Midnight Train to Georgemas Type of document Report Date 08/12/2017 File name Midnight Train to Georgemas Report v5 Reference number 105983 Number of pages 57 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Claire Mackay Principal Author 03/07/2017 James Consultant Jackson David Project 1 Connolly, Checked Director 24/07/2017 by Alan Director Beswick Approved David Project 24/07/2017 by Connolly Director James Principal Author 21/11/2017 Jackson Consultant Alan Modifications Director Beswick to service Checked 2 21/11/2017 costs and by Project David demand Director Connolly forecasts Approved David Project 21/11/2017 by Connolly Director James Principal Author 08/12/2017 Jackson Consultant Alan Director Beswick Checked Final client 3 08/12/2017 by Project comments David Director Connolly Approved David Project 08/12/2017 by Connolly Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6 2.1 EXISTING COACH AND RAIL SERVICES 6 2.2 CALEDONIAN SLEEPER 7 2.3 CAR -BASED TRAVEL TO /FROM THE CAITHNESS /O RKNEY AREA 8 2.4 EXISTING FERRY SERVICES AND POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THESE 9 2.5 AIR SERVICES TO ORKNEY AND WICK 10 2.6 MOBILE PHONE -BASED ESTIMATES OF CURRENT TRAVEL PATTERNS 11 3. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 14 4. PROBLEMS/ISSUES 14 4.2 CONSTRAINTS 16 4.3 RISKS : 16 5. OPPORTUNITIES 17 6. SLEEPER OPERATIONS 19 6.1 INTRODUCTION 19 6.2 SERVICE DESCRIPTION & ROUTING OPTIONS 19 6.3 MIXED TRAIN OPERATION 22 6.4 TRACTION & ROLLING STOCK OPTIONS 25 6.5 TIMETABLE PLANNING 32 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Northmavine the Laird’S Room at the Tangwick Haa Museum Tom Anderson
    Northmavine The Laird’s room at the Tangwick Haa Museum Tom Anderson Tangwick Haa All aspects of life in Northmavine over the years are Northmavine The wilds of the North well illustrated in the displays at Tangwick Haa Museum at Eshaness. The Haa was built in the late 17th century for the Cheyne family, lairds of the Tangwick Estate and elsewhere in Shetland. Some Useful Information Johnnie Notions Accommodation: VisitShetland, Lerwick, John Williamson of Hamnavoe, known as Tel:01595 693434 Johnnie Notions for his inventive mind, was one of Braewick Caravan Park, Northmavine’s great characters. Though uneducated, Eshaness, Tel 01806 503345 he designed his own inoculation against smallpox, Neighbourhood saving thousands of local people from this 18th Information Point: Tangwick Haa Museum, Eshaness century scourge of Shetland, without losing a single Shops: Hillswick, Ollaberry patient. Fuel: Ollaberry Public Toilets: Hillswick, Ollaberry, Eshaness Tom Anderson Places to Eat: Hillswick, Eshaness Another famous son of Northmavine was Dr Tom Post Offices: Hillswick, Ollaberry Anderson MBE. A prolific composer of fiddle tunes Public Telephones: Sullom, Ollaberry, Leon, and a superb player, he is perhaps best remembered North Roe, Hillswick, Urafirth, for his work in teaching young fiddlers and for his role Eshaness in preserving Shetland’s musical heritage. He was Churches: Sullom, Hillswick, North Roe, awarded an honorary doctorate from Stirling Ollaberry University for his efforts in this field. Doctor: Hillswick, Tel: 01806 503277 Police Station: Brae, Tel: 01806 522381 The camping böd which now stands where Johnnie Notions once lived Contents copyright protected - please contact Shetland Amenity Trust for details. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the contents are accurate, the funding partners do not accept responsibility for any errors in this leaflet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kirk in the Garden of Evie
    THE KIRK IN THE GARDEN OF EVIE A Thumbnail Sketch of the History of the Church in Evie Trevor G Hunt Minister of the linked Churches of Evie, Firth and Rendall, Orkney First Published by Evie Kirk Session Evie, Orkney. 1987 Republished 1996 ComPrint, Orkney 908056 Forward to the 1987 Publication This brief history was compiled for the centenary of the present Evie Church building and I am indebted to all who have helped me in this work. I am especially indebted to the Kirk’s present Session Clerk, William Wood of Aikerness, who furnished useful local information, searched through old Session Minutes, and compiled the list of ministers for Appendix 3. Alastair Marwick of Whitemire, Clerk to the Board, supplied a good deal of literature, obtained a copy of the Title Deeds, gained access to the “Kirk aboon the Hill”, and conducted a tour (even across fields in his car) to various sites. He also contributed valuable local information and I am grateful for all his support. Thanks are also due to Margaret Halcro of Lower Crowrar, Rendall, for information about her name sake, and to the Moars of Crook, Rendall, for other Halcro family details. And to Sheila Lyon (Hestwall, Sandwick), who contributed information about Margaret Halcro (of the seventeenth century!). TREVOR G HUNT Finstown Manse March 1987 Foreword to the 1996 Publication Nearly ten years on seemed a good time to make this history available again, and to use the advances in computer technology to improve its appearance and to make one or two minor corrections.. I was also anxious to include the text of the history as a page on the Evie, Firth and Rendall Churches’ Internet site for reference and, since revision was necessary to do this, it was an opportunity to republish in printed form.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds
    SB 30(2) COV 27/5/10 10:55 Page 1 The pair of Ptarmigan were roosting either side of a PhotoSP T boulder, and observing them for a while, they didn’t Plate 155. On a wintery day© in March 2010 I drove move. I decided to move a little bit closer to try and to the Cairngorms to record any birds I might see. capture a picture and I did this every five minutes or SCOTTISH There was snow at 1000 feet, and the mountain I so until I got to a decent distance for the 400 mm decided to climb was not far from thousands of lens. The picture I believe gives a real feeling to the skiers. I encountered Red Grouse at 1500 feet and extreme habitat in which Ptarmigan exist. I backed just a little bit higher at c. 2000 feet I came across off and left them to roost in peace. my first Ptarmigan. There was also a pair slightly BIRDS higher at c. 2900 feet. For people who are interested in camera gear, I used a Canon 40D, 400 mm lens and a Bushawk On my climb I also found foot prints of Mountain shoulder mount. Volume 30 (2) 30 (2) Volume Hare and more grouse. I’m sure the Ptarmigan had been forced lower down the hill to feed, as there John Chapman was so much snow cover and on the tops it must (www.johnchapmanphotographer.co.uk) have been -15°C the night before. Scottish Birds June 2010 published by the SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Featuring the best images posted on the SOC website each quarter, PhotoSpot will present stunning portraits as well as record shots of something unique, accompanied by the story behind the photograph and the equipment used.
    [Show full text]
  • S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It
    3 S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It is probably true to say that the most enduring aspect of Norse place-names in the Hebrides, if we expect settlement names, has been the toponymy of the sea coast. This is perhaps not surprising, when we consider the importance of the sea and the seashore in the economy of the islands throughout history. The interplay of agriculture and fishing has contributed in no small measure to the great variety of toponymic terms which are to be found in the islands. Moreover, the broken nature of the island coasts, and the variety of scenery which they afford, have ensured the survival of a great number of coastal terms, both in Gaelic and Norse. The purpose of this paper, then, is to examine these terms with a Norse content in the hope of assessing the importance of the two languages in the various islands concerned. The distribution of Norse names in the Hebrides has already attracted scholars like Oftedal and Nicolaisen, who have concen­ trated on establis'hed settlement names, such as the village names of Lewis (OftedaI1954) and the major Norse settlement elements (Nicolaisen, S.H.R. 1969). These studies, however, have limited themselves to settlement names, although both would recognise that the less important names also merit study in an intensive way. The field-work done by the Scottish Place Name Survey, and localised studies like those done by MacAulay (TGSI, 1972) have gone some way to rectifying this omission, but the amount of material available is enormous, and it may be some years yet before it is assembled in a form which can be of use to scholar­ ship.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.2.1 Kyle Rhea Data the Telemetry Data from the Kyle Rhea Study
    TITLE: DATA REQUEST ISLE OF SKYE DATE: NOVEMBER 2016 REPORT CODE: SMRUC-JAC-2016-015 Figure 15 Telemetry tracks from the 13 harbour seals tagged at Loch Bay and Loch Dunvegan within the Ascrib, Isay and Dunvegan SAC in 2004 and 2005. 5.2.1 Kyle Rhea data The telemetry data from the Kyle Rhea study shows a very high density of tracks moving through and/or foraging within the channel between Skye and mainland Scotland (Figure 16). In total, 93.4% of all the GPS positions obtained from these nine seals were inside the Study Area. Only two seals left the Study Area for a significant portion of their time. Seal pv43-394-12 recorded 75% of its GPS positions inside the Study Area; for the remaining 25% of the time it travelled south out of the narrows at Kyle Rhea and west to off the south east coast of South Uist (Figure 16). Seal pv43-350-12 recorded 50% of its GPS positions inside the Study Area; for the remaining 50% of the time it travelled north out of the Study Area directly to the Butt of Lewis (Figure 16). Of these nine tagged seals, six left the narrows at Kyle Rhea at travelled north and west round the coast of Skye past the Project Site (Figure 16). One seal (pv43-376-12) moved along the coast of Skye, directly past the jetty construction site, with GPS location positions only 90 m from the construction site (Figure 17). These data show that there is clear connectivity between the Project 31 TITLE: DATA REQUEST ISLE OF SKYE DATE: NOVEMBER 2016 REPORT CODE: SMRUC-JAC-2016-015 construction site and the harbour seal haul out in Kyle Rhea.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Existing Protected Areas of Identification of Remaining MPA Search Features Priorities Pdf, 1.40MB
    FINAL REPORT Contribution of existing protected areas to the MPA network and identification of remaining MPA search feature priorities For further information on this report please contact: Morven Carruthers Oliver Crawford-Avis Scottish Natural Heritage Joint Nature Conservation Committee Great Glen House Inverdee House Leachkin Road Baxter Street Inverness, IV3 8NW Aberdeen, AB11 9QA Telephone: 01463 725 018 Telephone: 01224 266587 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Carruthers, M., Chaniotis, P.D., Clark, L., Crawford-Avis, O., Gillham, K., Linwood, M., Oates, J., Steel, L., and Wilson, E. 2011. Contribution of existing protected areas to the MPA network and identification of remaining MPA search feature priorities. Internal report produced by Scottish Natural Heritage, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and Marine Scotland for the Scottish Marine Protected Areas Project. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. This report was produced as part of the Scottish MPA Project and the views expressed by the author(s) should not be taken as the views and policies of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Scottish Natural Heritage or Scottish Ministers. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Detailed assessments were completed for each of the MPA search features, based on the data available in GeMS1. These were used as a basis to assess the extent to which MPA search features are represented within the existing network of protected areas. 130 protected areas (including marine SACs, SPA extensions, SSSIs with maritime components, and fisheries areas established for nature conservation purposes) were included in the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Marwick Head Wave Farm Request for a Scoping Opinion December 2012
    Proposed Marwick Head Wave Farm Request for a Scoping Opinion December 2012 This page is intentionally blank CONTENTS CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1. BACKGROUND 4 1.2. DOCUMENT PURPOSE 4 1.3. DOCUMENT STRUCTURE 5 2. POLICY & LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT 6 2.1. CLIMATE CHANGE 6 2.2. RENEWABLE ENERGY 6 2.3. PLANNING CONTEXT 7 2.3.1. Terrestrial Planning 7 2.3.2. Marine Planning 8 2.4. DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND EIA 9 2.4.1. Consents and Licensing 9 2.4.2. EIA Regulations 10 2.4.3. Other Consents and Licenses 13 2.4.4. Legislation 14 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT 15 3.1. SITE SELECTION 15 3.2. SITE LOCATION 15 3.3. NATURE OF THE PROPOSED WAVE FARM 18 3.3.1. Candidate Technology 18 3.3.2. Pelamis Wave Energy Converter 18 3.3.3. Components 18 3.3.4. Converter Spacing 19 3.3.5. Mooring 20 3.3.6. Installation Methodology 20 3.3.7. Installation Infrastructure 20 3.3.8. Monitoring Devices - Met masts / Wave buoys 21 3.3.9. Inter-Array Cabling 21 3.3.10. Export Cabling/Grid Connection 21 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ScottishPower Renewables i 3.3.11. Operations and Maintenance Strategy 21 3.3.12. Operations and Maintenance Infrastructure 22 3.3.13. Decommissioning 23 4. ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE & POTENTIAL EFFECTS 24 4.1. INTRODUCTION 24 4.1.1. Assessment Methodology 24 4.1.2. Cumulative and In-Combination Impacts 24 4.2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 25 4.2.1. Marine and Coastal Processes 25 4.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Survey Report Ronas
    Scottish Sanitary Survey Project Sanitary Survey Report Ronas Voe SI 522 and SI 523 October 2010 Cefas SSS F1006 V1.1 2012/11/01 Report Distribution – Ronas Voe Date Name Agency* Linda Galbraith Scottish Government Mike Watson Scottish Government Morag MacKenzie SEPA Douglas Sinclair SEPA Fiona Garner Scottish Water Alex Adrian Crown Estate Dawn Manson Shetland Islands Council Sean Williamson NAFC Michael Laurenson Harvester** * Distribution of both draft and final reports to relevant agency personnel is undertaken by FSAS. ** Distribution of draft and final reports to harvesters is undertaken by the relevant local authority. i Table of Contents 1. General Description .................................................................................. 1 2. Fishery ...................................................................................................... 2 3. Human Population .................................................................................... 5 4. Sewage Discharges .................................................................................. 6 5. Geology and Soils ..................................................................................... 8 6. Land Cover ............................................................................................... 9 7. Farm Animals .......................................................................................... 10 8. Wildlife .................................................................................................... 12 8.1 Pinnipeds .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BIRSAY the BROUGH of BIRSAY T
    ogb 3 collated.qxp 26/10/2005 20:21 Page 290 WEST MAINLAND - BIRSAY THE BROUGH OF BIRSAY t h verted to solar power in g i r y 2001 and stands above low p o c cliffs on the seaward side. n w o Puffins breed in rabbit bur- r C rows along the top of these cliffs, one of the very few places on the Mainland where they can be seen. Brough Head is a good place for sea watching dur- ing bird migration times. Killer, Minke and Pilot Whales are occasionally seen from here, possibly attracted by the rich feeding where tides meet. Aerial view of the Norse settlement and church on the Brough of Birsay BIRSAY The Vikings called described in the Orkneyinga The island is only accessible Pictish leader in the 7th or 8th glass were found around the the whole area of Birsay and Saga), he built Orkney's first when the tide is out via a century. well, suggesting that it may Harray "Byrgisherad" (ON cathedral, Christchurch, at concrete path which leads have been used to quench Byrgisey, island of the Birsay for his new Bishop, across the rocks of Brough The only Pictish structure work. On some moulds the enclosure or rampart and in about 1057. Most of the Sounds. This path can be visible is the small well east design of the piece to be cast Herad, district). Birsay was north of Birsay became slidy and should not be of the church wall. However, could be seen, confirming important in Viking times known as “The Barony” crossed if it is covered, as excavations have revealed that the designs were and was a favourite resi- and was Bishopric land from the strong tide can be dan- many Pictish artefacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkwall to Stromness and Return
    "West about" Kirkwall to Stromness and return These notes are only for guidance about tide times. We accept no responsibility for navigation, avoidance of hazards, weather, or your seamanship. It is 36 nm from Kirkwall to Stromness which looks like a 7+ hour passage at 5 knots but it can easily be done in under 5 hours if the tide is used well. Conversely it can take all day if you get the tides wrong! Skippers should also consider the direction of wind as a fresh westerly or north westerly in conjunction with spring tides can make for a bumpy ride. That being said, if you plan your passage so as to avoid wind against tide it should be a straightforward, enjoyable, fast trip. There are 2 tide “gates” to bear in mind; the first is the exit of Eynhallow Sound at the isle of Eynhallow itself, which is around 12 nm north west from Kirkwall. A severe tide race (known in Orkney as a “rost”, and pronounced “roost”) can be generated during the ebb. The second is the entrance to Hoy Sound, known as Hoy Mouth which once again can generate a severe race on the ebb tide. Both of these tide races usually only appear during ebb tides. The tide streams in Orkney generally turn in line with Dover tide times. A latest departure from Kirkwall at 3 hours after HW Dover should carry you swiftly on the ebb to Eynhallow with an hour or so of ebb still remaining ­ but with the mid tide rost subsiding ­ sufficient to give fair tide westwards after Eynhallow to the Brough of Birsay headland before the east­going flood begins.
    [Show full text]