DOCSLIB.ORG

Contribution of Existing Protected Areas of Identification of Remaining MPA Search Features Priorities Pdf, 1.40MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL REPORT Contribution of existing protected areas to the MPA network and identification of remaining MPA search feature priorities For further information on this report please contact: Morven Carruthers Oliver Crawford-Avis Scottish Natural Heritage Joint Nature Conservation Committee Great Glen House Inverdee House Leachkin Road Baxter Street Inverness, IV3 8NW Aberdeen, AB11 9QA Telephone: 01463 725 018 Telephone: 01224 266587 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Carruthers, M., Chaniotis, P.D., Clark, L., Crawford-Avis, O., Gillham, K., Linwood, M., Oates, J., Steel, L., and Wilson, E. 2011. Contribution of existing protected areas to the MPA network and identification of remaining MPA search feature priorities. Internal report produced by Scottish Natural Heritage, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and Marine Scotland for the Scottish Marine Protected Areas Project. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. This report was produced as part of the Scottish MPA Project and the views expressed by the author(s) should not be taken as the views and policies of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Scottish Natural Heritage or Scottish Ministers. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Detailed assessments were completed for each of the MPA search features, based on the data available in GeMS1. These were used as a basis to assess the extent to which MPA search features are represented within the existing network of protected areas. 130 protected areas (including marine SACs, SPA extensions, SSSIs with maritime components, and fisheries areas established for nature conservation purposes) were included in the analysis. A further eight locations (including Areas of Search for SACs and dSACs) were noted, but not considered in the assessment as part of the existing MPA network. Eight MPA search features are considered to be well represented within the existing network, either in territorial or offshore waters, or both. A further five MPA search features are not considered to be useful drivers for the selection of MPAs, in light of the data available. 24 SACs and six fisheries areas established for nature conservation were considered to contribute to the protection of MPA search features. 10 further protected areas could provide an additional contribution to the network if they were enhanced with MPA designation. 31 MPA search features are considered to remain priorities, either in territorial or offshore waters, or both. The list of MPA search features which will be used to focus options for finalising the MPA network will be refined following the outcome of discussions at the 3rd National Stakeholder workshop and agreement of which areas will be enhanced. 1 GeMS - Geodatabase of Marine features in Scotland 2 Contents Page no. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 2 1. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 5 2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 6 3. METHODS................................................................................................................... 6 4. ASSESSMENT OF MPA SEARCH FEATURE PRESENCE AND PRIORITISATION OF REMAINING MPA SEARCH FEATURES............................................................. 9 5. ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS FOR ENHANCING EXISTING PROTECTED AREAS ........................................................................................................................ 20 6. NEXT STEPS .............................................................................................................. 27 7. ANNEXES ................................................................................................................... 28 Annex 1 Description of detailed assessments undertaken for MPA search features....................................................................................................... 28 Annex 2 Existing protected areas considered within the analysis ............................ 31 3 List of figures and tables Page no. Figure 1 Technical process for identifying Nature Conservation MPAs: how MPA search features will be used to complete the MPA network............................. 5 Table A(i) Contribution of existing SACs to the MPA network .......................................... 9 Table A(ii) Contribution of existing fisheries areas established for nature conservation to the MPA network..................................................................... 12 Table B Representation of MPA search features within existing SACs and fisheries areas established for nature conservation ......................................... 12 Table C MPA search features already well represented within existing protected areas ................................................................................................................ 15 Table D MPA search features which are not well represented within existing protected areas but which are not being considered as drivers for developing the MPA network …. ...................................................................... 15 Table E MPA search features considered to be gaps in the existing network............... 16 Table F Occurrence of MPA search features within and adjacent to existing protected areas and preferred options for their contribution to the network............................................................................................................. 21 Table G Existing protected areas containing MPA search features identified as gaps, together with reasons for not considering further ................................... 25 4 1. BACKGROUND The Scottish MPA Selection Guidelines set out the policy and approach for selecting MPAs and developing an ecologically coherent network of MPAs in Scotland’s seas. MPAs are set within the broader context of Scottish Government’s three pillar approach to marine nature conservation comprising site protection, species protection and wider seas policies and measures. Figure 1 is taken from the MPA Selection Guidelines and shows the technical process for identifying MPAs. Figure 1 Technical process for identifying Nature Conservation MPAs: how MPA search features will be used to complete the MPA network Step B in the flow chart above incorporates the current analysis as well as other related tasks. Under Initial steps (Section 5.6), the Scottish MPA Selection Guidelines state: For biodiversity, the process began with development of a list of MPA search features 2 and a review of: The potential contribution that existing (and proposed) Natura sites and other designations could make to the protection of MPA search features. 2 A list of MPA search features is provided in Annex 3 of the Scottish MPA Selection Guidelines 5 This analysis is about recognising what these protected areas can deliver beyond their existing qualifying features and management. Included within this analysis are areas with fisheries restrictions which have been put in place for the purpose of nature conservation. 2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this analysis is to assess which features are already being protected by existing protected areas, which existing protected areas could deliver more to the MPA network through enhancement and therefore identify which MPA search features should remain as priorities in the identification of suitable search locations. The objectives are to: i. Assess the distribution of MPA search features within existing protected areas including Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas3, Sites of Special Scientific Interest and fisheries areas established for nature conservation. ii. Assess the protection of MPA search features within existing protected areas. This assessment is to be based on whether or not the feature is considered to be part of the feature(s) covered by the formal designation or the fisheries management. iii. Identify existing protected areas which already contribute to the network. Identify and prioritise options for increasing the contribution that existing protected areas could make to the network if they were to be enhanced by a Nature Conservation MPA. iv. Identify which MPA search features should be considered priorities for selecting new Nature Conservation MPAs in Scotland’s seas. 3. METHODS The assessment work was carried out in four parts: A. Detailed assessment of each MPA search feature. B. Assessment of presence of MPA search features in existing protected areas. C. Identification of areas which already contribute to the protection of MPA search features and those which could deliver more through enhancing the existing protection. D. Review of prioritisation of MPA search features. The methods used for each are described below. A. Detailed assessment of each MPA search feature Annex 1 provides a description of the detailed assessments undertaken for each MPA search feature. The data on which these assessments are based come from GeMS4 (Ver. 1). The assessments have been produced to provide transparent summaries of all the relevant information on these features and allow ready access to the interpreted data without having to rely on direct access to GeMS. The detailed assessments
Recommended publications
  • List of Lights Radio Aids and Fog Signals 2011

    List of Lights Radio Aids and Fog Signals 2011

    PUB. 114 LIST OF LIGHTS RADIO AIDS AND FOG SIGNALS 2011 BRITISH ISLES, ENGLISH CHANNEL AND NORTH SEA IMPORTANT THIS PUBLICATION SHOULD BE CORRECTED EACH WEEK FROM THE NOTICE TO MARINERS Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Bethesda, MD © COPYRIGHT 2011 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. *7642014007536* NSN 7642014007536 NGA REF. NO. LLPUB114 LIST OF LIGHTS LIMITS NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PREFACE The 2011 edition of Pub. 114, List of Lights, Radio Aids and Fog Signals for the British Isles, English Channel and North Sea, cancels the previous edition of Pub. 114. This edition contains information available to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) up to 2 April 2011, including Notice to Mariners No. 14 of 2011. A summary of corrections subsequent to the above date will be in Section II of the Notice to Mariners which announced the issuance of this publication. In the interval between new editions, corrective information affecting this publication will be published in the Notice to Mariners and must be applied in order to keep this publication current. Nothing in the manner of presentation of information in this publication or in the arrangement of material implies endorsement or acceptance by NGA in matters affecting the status and boundaries of States and Territories. RECORD OF CORRECTIONS PUBLISHED IN WEEKLY NOTICE TO MARINERS NOTICE TO MARINERS YEAR 2011 YEAR 2012 1........ 14........ 27........ 40........ 1........ 14........ 27........ 40........ 2........ 15........ 28........ 41........ 2........ 15........ 28........ 41........ 3........ 16........ 29........ 42........ 3........ 16........ 29........ 42........ 4.......
  • Scottish Birds

    Scottish Birds

    SB 30(2) COV 27/5/10 10:55 Page 1 The pair of Ptarmigan were roosting either side of a PhotoSP T boulder, and observing them for a while, they didn’t Plate 155. On a wintery day© in March 2010 I drove move. I decided to move a little bit closer to try and to the Cairngorms to record any birds I might see. capture a picture and I did this every five minutes or SCOTTISH There was snow at 1000 feet, and the mountain I so until I got to a decent distance for the 400 mm decided to climb was not far from thousands of lens. The picture I believe gives a real feeling to the skiers. I encountered Red Grouse at 1500 feet and extreme habitat in which Ptarmigan exist. I backed just a little bit higher at c. 2000 feet I came across off and left them to roost in peace. my first Ptarmigan. There was also a pair slightly BIRDS higher at c. 2900 feet. For people who are interested in camera gear, I used a Canon 40D, 400 mm lens and a Bushawk On my climb I also found foot prints of Mountain shoulder mount. Volume 30 (2) 30 (2) Volume Hare and more grouse. I’m sure the Ptarmigan had been forced lower down the hill to feed, as there John Chapman was so much snow cover and on the tops it must (www.johnchapmanphotographer.co.uk) have been -15°C the night before. Scottish Birds June 2010 published by the SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Featuring the best images posted on the SOC website each quarter, PhotoSpot will present stunning portraits as well as record shots of something unique, accompanied by the story behind the photograph and the equipment used.
  • S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It

    S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It

    3 S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It is probably true to say that the most enduring aspect of Norse place-names in the Hebrides, if we expect settlement names, has been the toponymy of the sea coast. This is perhaps not surprising, when we consider the importance of the sea and the seashore in the economy of the islands throughout history. The interplay of agriculture and fishing has contributed in no small measure to the great variety of toponymic terms which are to be found in the islands. Moreover, the broken nature of the island coasts, and the variety of scenery which they afford, have ensured the survival of a great number of coastal terms, both in Gaelic and Norse. The purpose of this paper, then, is to examine these terms with a Norse content in the hope of assessing the importance of the two languages in the various islands concerned. The distribution of Norse names in the Hebrides has already attracted scholars like Oftedal and Nicolaisen, who have concen­ trated on establis'hed settlement names, such as the village names of Lewis (OftedaI1954) and the major Norse settlement elements (Nicolaisen, S.H.R. 1969). These studies, however, have limited themselves to settlement names, although both would recognise that the less important names also merit study in an intensive way. The field-work done by the Scottish Place Name Survey, and localised studies like those done by MacAulay (TGSI, 1972) have gone some way to rectifying this omission, but the amount of material available is enormous, and it may be some years yet before it is assembled in a form which can be of use to scholar­ ship.
  • 5.2.1 Kyle Rhea Data the Telemetry Data from the Kyle Rhea Study

    5.2.1 Kyle Rhea Data the Telemetry Data from the Kyle Rhea Study

    TITLE: DATA REQUEST ISLE OF SKYE DATE: NOVEMBER 2016 REPORT CODE: SMRUC-JAC-2016-015 Figure 15 Telemetry tracks from the 13 harbour seals tagged at Loch Bay and Loch Dunvegan within the Ascrib, Isay and Dunvegan SAC in 2004 and 2005. 5.2.1 Kyle Rhea data The telemetry data from the Kyle Rhea study shows a very high density of tracks moving through and/or foraging within the channel between Skye and mainland Scotland (Figure 16). In total, 93.4% of all the GPS positions obtained from these nine seals were inside the Study Area. Only two seals left the Study Area for a significant portion of their time. Seal pv43-394-12 recorded 75% of its GPS positions inside the Study Area; for the remaining 25% of the time it travelled south out of the narrows at Kyle Rhea and west to off the south east coast of South Uist (Figure 16). Seal pv43-350-12 recorded 50% of its GPS positions inside the Study Area; for the remaining 50% of the time it travelled north out of the Study Area directly to the Butt of Lewis (Figure 16). Of these nine tagged seals, six left the narrows at Kyle Rhea at travelled north and west round the coast of Skye past the Project Site (Figure 16). One seal (pv43-376-12) moved along the coast of Skye, directly past the jetty construction site, with GPS location positions only 90 m from the construction site (Figure 17). These data show that there is clear connectivity between the Project 31 TITLE: DATA REQUEST ISLE OF SKYE DATE: NOVEMBER 2016 REPORT CODE: SMRUC-JAC-2016-015 construction site and the harbour seal haul out in Kyle Rhea.
  • Scottish Sea Kayaking Sea Scottish

    Scottish Sea Kayaking Sea Scottish

    Scottish Sea Kayaking At last, here it is… Scotland’s first guidebook for sea kayakers wishing to explore its amazing coastline and magical islands. It brings together a selection of fifty great sea voyages around the mainland of Scotland, Doug Cooper & George Reid from the Mull of Galloway in the SW to St Abb’s Head on the east coast, as well as voyages in the Western Isles, ranging from day trips to three day journeys. Illustrated with superb colour photographs and useful maps throughout, it is a practical guide to help you select and plan trips. It will provide inspiration for future voyages and a souvenir of journeys undertaken. As well as providing essential information on where to start and finish, distances, times and tidal information, the book does much to stimulate and inform our interest in the environment we are passing through. It is full of facts and anecdotes about local history, geology, scenery, seabirds and sea mammals. A fascinating read and an inspirational book. Scottish Sea Kayaking Scottish Sea Kayaking fifty great sea kayak voyages fifty great sea kayak voyages Doug Cooper & George Reid Also available from 35 36 38 39 33 37 Pesda Press 40 27 26 Sea Kayak Navigation 41 The Seamanship Pocketbook Stornoway 32 25 Welsh Sea Kayaking 24 South West Sea Kayaking 22 34 21 The Northern Isles 31 23 Oileáin - A Guide to the Irish Islands 18 43 30 17 44 Kayak Surfing 42 16 Kayak Rolling 29 19 Scottish White Water 15 Inverness 45 English White Water 14 20 Canoe and Kayak Handbook White Water Safety and Rescue 13 ..
  • HORSE MUSSEL BEDS Image Map

    HORSE MUSSEL BEDS Image Map

    PRIORITY MARINE FEATURE (PMF) - FISHERIES MANAGEMENT REVIEW Feature HORSE MUSSEL BEDS Image Map Image: Rob Cook Description Characteristics - Horse mussels (Modiolus modiolus) may occur as isolated individuals or aggregated into beds in the form of scattered clumps, thin layers or dense raised hummocks or mounds, with densities reaching up to 400 individuals per m2 (Lindenbaum et al., 2008). Individuals can grow to lengths >150 mm and live for >45 years (Anwar et al., 1990). The mussels attach to the substratum and to each other using tough threads (known as byssus) to create a distinctive biogenic habitat (or reef) that stabilises seabed sediments and can extend over several hectares. Silt, organic waste and shell material accumulate within the structure and further increase the bed height. In this way, horse mussel beds significantly modify sedimentary habitats and provide substrate, refuge and ecological niches for a wide variety of organisms. The beds increase local biodiversity and may provide settling grounds for commercially important bivalves, such as queen scallops. Fish make use of both the higher production of benthic prey and the added structural complexity (OSPAR, 2009). Definition - Beds are formed from clumps of horse mussels and shells covering more than 30% of the seabed over an area of at least 5 m x 5 m. Live adult horse mussels must be present. The horse mussels may be semi-infaunal (partially embedded within the seabed sediments - with densities of greater than 5 live individuals per m2) or form epifaunal mounds (standing clear of the substrate with more than 10 live individuals per clump) (Morris, 2015).
  • Odd Rocks in the Outer Hebrides” Michael Spencer Sheetlines, 114 (April 2019), Pp8-15 Stable URL

    Odd Rocks in the Outer Hebrides” Michael Spencer Sheetlines, 114 (April 2019), Pp8-15 Stable URL

    Sheetlines The journal of THE CHARLES CLOSE SOCIETY for the Study of Ordnance Survey Maps “Odd rocks in the Outer Hebrides” Michael Spencer Sheetlines, 114 (April 2019), pp8-15 Stable URL: www.charlesclosesociety.org/files/OddrocksinOuterHebrides.pdf This article is provided for personal, non-commercial use only. Please contact the Society regarding any other use of this work. Published by THE CHARLES CLOSE SOCIETY for the Study of Ordnance Survey Maps www.CharlesCloseSociety.org The Charles Close Society was founded in 1980 to bring together all those with an interest in the maps and history of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain and its counterparts in the island of Ireland. The Society takes its name from Colonel Sir Charles Arden-Close, OS Director General from 1911 to 1922, and initiator of many of the maps now sought after by collectors. The Society publishes a wide range of books and booklets on historic OS map series and its journal, Sheetlines, is recognised internationally for its specialist articles on Ordnance Survey-related topics. 8 Odd rocks in the Outer Hebrides Michael Spencer Certain rocks and clusters of rocks exist off the west coast of Scotland that are not shown consistently at all scales on the map. Before pointing the finger at the OS, we should perhaps decide what we want the map to show. And as usual, with any question relating to the sea, we have to start with the tides. 1. Tides It is well known that the diurnal variation in the height of the tide is a result of the gravitational fields of the sun and the moon, their effects moderated by the motion of the earth in these fields.
  • Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science

    Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science

    Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Volume 5 Number 9 Strategic surveys of seabirds off the west coast of Lewis to determine use of seaspace in areas of potential marine renewable energy developments © Crown copyright 2014 Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Vol 5 No 9 Strategic surveys of seabirds off the west coast of Lewis to determine use of seaspace in areas of potential marine renewable energy developments Published by Marine Scotland Science ISSN: 2043-7722 Marine Scotland is the directorate of the Scottish Government responsible for the integrated management of Scotland’s seas. Marine Scotland Science (formerly Fisheries Research Services) provides expert scientific and technical advice on marine and fisheries issues. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science is a series of reports that publishes results of research and monitoring carried out by Marine Scotland Science. It also publishes the results of marine and freshwater scientific work that has been carried out for Marine Scotland under external commission. These reports are not subject to formal external peer-review. This report presents the results of marine and freshwater scientific work carried out for Marine Scotland under external commission. Copies of this report are available from the Marine Scotland website at www.scotland.gov.uk/marinescotland Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (Consulting) Ltd and HiDef Aerial Survey Limited accept no responsibility or liability for any use which is made of this document other than by the Client for the purpose for which it was originally
  • The Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2019

    The Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2019

    SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2019 No. 56 FISHERIES RIVER SEA FISHERIES The Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2019 Made - - - - 18th February 2019 Laid before the Scottish Parliament 20th February 2019 Coming into force - - 1st April 2019 The Scottish Ministers make the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 38(1) and (6)(b) and (c) and paragraphs 7(b) and 14(1) of schedule 1 of the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 2003( a) and all other powers enabling them to do so. In accordance with paragraphs 10, 11 and 14(1) of schedule 1 of that Act they have consulted such persons as they considered appropriate, directed that notice be given of the general effect of these Regulations and considered representations and objections made. Citation and Commencement 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2019 and come into force on 1 April 2019. Amendment of the Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Regulations 2016 2. —(1) The Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Regulations 2016( b) are amended in accordance with paragraphs (2) to (4). (2) In regulation 3(2) (prohibition on retaining salmon), for “paragraphs (2A) and (3)” substitute “paragraph (3)”. (3) Omit regulation 3(2A). (a) 2003 asp 15. Section 38 was amended by section 29 of the Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Act 2013 (asp 7). (b) S.S.I. 2016/115 as amended by S.S.I. 2016/392 and S.S.I. 2018/37. (4) For schedule 2 (inland waters: prohibition on retaining salmon), substitute the schedule set out in the schedule of these Regulations.
  • ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LASTUPDATED - 29OCTOBER 2017 Royal Navy Loss List Complete Database Page 2 of 208

    ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LASTUPDATED - 29OCTOBER 2017 Royal Navy Loss List Complete Database Page 2 of 208

    ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LAST UPDATED - 29 OCTOBER 2017 Photo: Swash Channel wreck courtesy of Bournemouth University MAST is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales, number 07455580 and charity number 1140497 | www.thisismast.org | [email protected] Royal Navy Loss List complete database Page 2 of 208 The Royal Navy (RN) Loss List (LL), from 1512-1947, is compiled from the volumes MAST hopes this will be a powerful research tool, amassing for the first time all RN and websites listed below from the earliest known RN wreck. The accuracy is only as losses in one place. It realises that there will be gaps and would gratefully receive good as these sources which have been thoroughly transcribed and cross-checked. any comments. Equally if researchers have details on any RN ships that are not There will be inevitable transcription errors. The LL includes minimal detail on the listed, or further information to add to the list on any already listed, please contact loss (ie. manner of loss except on the rare occasion that a specific position is known; MAST at [email protected]. MAST also asks that if this resource is used in any also noted is manner of loss, if known ie. if burnt, scuttled, foundered etc.). In most publication and public talk, that it is acknowledged. cases it is unclear from the sources whether the ship was lost in the territorial waters of the country in question, in the EEZ or in international waters. In many cases ships Donations are lost in channels between two countries, eg.
  • 34 MYRIAPODS on the OUTER HEBRIDES Gordon B Corbet Little

    34 MYRIAPODS on the OUTER HEBRIDES Gordon B Corbet Little

    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MYRIAPOD AND ISOPOD GROUP Volume 20 2004 MYRIAPODS ON THE OUTER HEBRIDES Gordon B Corbet Little Dumbarnie, Upper Largo, Leven, Fife, KY8 6JG. INTRODUCTION Published records of myriapods from the Outer Hebrides are scanty and are summarised in three sources. Waterston (1981) recorded 15 species, with a list of islands from which each had been recorded. This incorporated records from Barra in 1935 reported by Waterston (1936). The provisional atlases (British Myriapod Group, 1988 for millipedes, Barber & Keay, 1988 for centipedes) recorded seven species, adding two to the total, but did not claim to be comprehensive with regard to earlier published records. In addition there are unpublished records of millipedes rising from a survey of invertebrates conducted in 1976 by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE, 1979). This included pitfall-trapping at 18 sites on Lewis/Harris, North Uist, Benbecula and South Uist, but produced only Cylindroiulus latestriatus (at every site), plus a single Polydesmus inconstans on North Uist. I visited the Outer Hebrides from 3rd to 13th June 2003 and recorded myriapods on the following islands: Lewis/Harris, Great Bernera (bridged), Scalpay (bridged), South Uist, Eriskay (bridged), Barra and Vatersay (bridged). Recording was solely by hand searching in leaf-litter and under stones, wood and refuse. The general impression was that myriapods were scarce, with a large proportion of turned stones revealing nothing. In contrast earwigs, Forficula auricularia were unusually abundant. MILLIPEDES Waterston (1981) recorded six species, including one, Cylindroiulus britannicus, from St Kilda only. The provisional atlas recorded four species post-1970 adding Ophyiulus pilosus.
  • Important Bird Areas and Potential Ramsar Sites in Europe

    Important Bird Areas and Potential Ramsar Sites in Europe

    cover def. 25-09-2001 14:23 Pagina 1 BirdLife in Europe In Europe, the BirdLife International Partnership works in more than 40 countries. Important Bird Areas ALBANIA and potential Ramsar Sites ANDORRA AUSTRIA BELARUS in Europe BELGIUM BULGARIA CROATIA CZECH REPUBLIC DENMARK ESTONIA FAROE ISLANDS FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY GIBRALTAR GREECE HUNGARY ICELAND IRELAND ISRAEL ITALY LATVIA LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LUXEMBOURG MACEDONIA MALTA NETHERLANDS NORWAY POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA RUSSIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND TURKEY UKRAINE UK The European IBA Programme is coordinated by the European Division of BirdLife International. For further information please contact: BirdLife International, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, PO Box 127, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands Telephone: +31 317 47 88 31, Fax: +31 317 47 88 44, Email: [email protected], Internet: www.birdlife.org.uk This report has been produced with the support of: Printed on environmentally friendly paper What is BirdLife International? BirdLife International is a Partnership of non-governmental conservation organisations with a special focus on birds. The BirdLife Partnership works together on shared priorities, policies and programmes of conservation action, exchanging skills, achievements and information, and so growing in ability, authority and influence. Each Partner represents a unique geographic area or territory (most often a country). In addition to Partners, BirdLife has Representatives and a flexible system of Working Groups (including some bird Specialist Groups shared with Wetlands International and/or the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN)), each with specific roles and responsibilities. I What is the purpose of BirdLife International? – Mission Statement The BirdLife International Partnership strives to conserve birds, their habitats and global biodiversity, working with people towards sustainability in the use of natural resources.