Certain Frozen Fish Fillets Form the Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets Form the Socialist Republic of Vietnam A-552-801 POR: 8/1/17 - 7/31/18 Public Document E&C/OV: Team April 20, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey I. Kessler Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance FROM: James Maeder Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations SUBJECT: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fifteenth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018 I. SUMMARY We analyzed the comments submitted by the petitioners,1 International Development and Investment Corporation (IDI), and NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (NTSF) in the fifteenth administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin calculations for the final results. We recommend that you approve the positions described in the “Discussion of the Issues” section of this memorandum. Comment 1: Whether to Calculate a Margin for NTSF Comment 2: Selection of Surrogate Country Comment 3: Applying Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to NTSF Vinh Long’s Farming Factors Comment 4: Surrogate Value (SV) for Movement Expenses Comment 5: Net-to-Gross-Weight Conversion for Movement Expenses Comment 6: Whether to Grant IDI a Separate Rate 1 The petitioners are: The Catfish Farmers of America and individual U.S. catfish processors America’s Catch, Inc., Alabama Catfish, LLC d/b/a Harvest Select Catfish, Inc., Consolidated Catfish Companies, LLC d/b/a Country Select Catfish, Delta Pride Catfish, Inc., Guidry’s Catfish, Inc., Heartland Catfish Company, Magnolia Processing, Inc. d/b/a Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm Raised Catfish, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners). II. BACKGROUND On October 4, 2018, we initiated the fifteenth administrative review of fish fillets from Vietnam.2 On October 22, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.3 From February 3, 2020 through February 11, 2020, we conducted verification of the questionnaire responses of NTSF.4 On February 13, 2020, we extended the deadline for the final results to April 17, 2020.5 Between March 18, 2020 and March 25, 2020, interested parties submitted case and rebuttal briefs.6 On April 15, 2020, we fully extended the deadline for issuance of these final results to April 20, 2020.7 III. SCOPE OF THE ORDER The product covered by the order is frozen fish fillets, including regular, shank, and strip fillets and portions thereof, whether or not breaded or marinated, of the species Pangasius Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus (also known as Pangasius Pangasius) and Pangasius Micronemus. Frozen fish fillets are lengthwise cuts of whole fish. The fillet products covered by the scope include boneless fillets with the belly flap intact (“regular” fillets), boneless fillets with the belly flap removed (“shank” fillets) and boneless shank fillets cut into strips (“fillet strips/finger”), which include fillets cut into strips, chunks, blocks, skewers, or any other shape. Specifically excluded from the scope are frozen whole fish (whether or not dressed), frozen steaks, and frozen belly-flap nuggets. Frozen whole, dressed fish are beheaded, skinned, and eviscerated. Steaks are bone-in, cross-section cuts of dressed fish. Nuggets are the belly-flaps. The subject merchandise will be hereinafter referred to as frozen “basa” and “tra” fillets, which are the Vietnamese common names for these species of fish. These products are classifiable under subheading 0304.62.0020 (Frozen Fish Fillets of the species Pangasius, including basa 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 50077 (October 4, 2018). 3 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 84 FR 56420 (October 22, 2019) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 4 See Memorandum, “Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company in the 2017-2018 Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,” dated March 13, 2020 (Verification Report). 5 See Memorandum, “Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated February 13, 2020. 6 See Petitioners’ Letter, “Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Case Brief,” dated March 18, 2020 (Petitioners Case Brief); NTSF’s Letter, “Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: NTSF’s Case Brief,” dated March 18, 2020 (NTSF Case Brief); IDI’s Letter, “Administrative Review of AD Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/01/17-07/31/18): IDI Case Brief,” dated March 18, 2020 (IDI Case Brief); Petitioners’ Letter, “Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief,” dated March 23, 2020 (Petitioners Rebuttal Brief); and NTSF’s Letter, “Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief,” March 23, 2020 (NTSF Rebuttal Brief). 7 See Memorandum, “15th Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated April 15, 2020. 2 and tra), and may enter under subheading 0305.59.0000, 1604.19.2100, 1604.19.3100, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100, and 1604.19.8100 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).8 The order covers all frozen fish fillets meeting the above specifications, regardless of tariff classification. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. IV. CHANGES SINCE THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS We calculated constructed export price and normal value (NV) for NTSF using the same methodology as applied in the Preliminary Results, except as follows: We used NTSF’s post-verification databases, which reflect minor corrections from verification, to calculate NTSF’s final dumping margin. We applied partial AFA with respect to NTSF Vinh Long’s farming factors of production (FOPs). See Comment 3 below. We made a change to NTSF’s net-to-gross weight conversion factor. See Comment 5 below. We are relying on only one of two surrogate financial statements used in the Preliminary Results, as this statement is contemporaneous with the period of review (POR). See Comment 2.C.5 below. We are valuing NTSF’s waste by-product by using an Indian data source. V. SEPARATE RATES In the Preliminary Results, we determined that the following companies met the criteria for separate rate status: (1) Can Tho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company (CASEAMEX); and (2) NTSF.9 With respect to CASEAMEX and NTSF, we have not received any arguments or information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsideration of these determinations. Therefore, we continue to find that these companies meet the criteria for a separate rate. We preliminarily determined that IDI did not meet the criteria for a separate rate. We received comments from the parties regarding IDI’s separate rate eligibility.10 As discussed below, we continue to find that IDI is not entitled to a separate rate. 8 Until June 30, 2004, these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6030, 0304.20.6096, 0304.20.6043, and 0304.20.6057. From July 1, 2004, until December 31, 2006, these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6033. From January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2011, these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.29.6033. On March 2, 2011, Commerce added two HTSUS numbers at the request of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): 1604.19.2000 and 1604.19.3000, which were changed to 1604.19.2100 and 1604.19.3100 on January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012, Commerce added the following HTSUS numbers at the request of CBP: 0304.62.0020, 0305.59.0000, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100, and 1604.19.8100. 9 See Preliminary Results PDM at 5. 10 See Comment 6. 3 VI. DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUES Comment 1: Whether to Calculate a Margin for NTSF In our Preliminary Results, we calculated a margin for NTSF relying on the company’s reported data. The petitioners assert that, for these final results, we should apply AFA to NTSF. Specifically, the petitioners assert that Commerce’s verification findings indicate that NTSF’s production data are unreliable and do not reconcile, and further assert that NTSF’s FOP allocations are not properly reported on a control number- (CONNUM-) specific basis. The Petitioners’ Comments NTSF’s FOP data are unreliable and unverifiable, and the company’s Section D11 responses and database must be disregarded. Taken together, these deficiencies warrant the application of AFA. Several facts, including Commerce’s yield tests at verification, support a finding that NTSF’s material balance is inaccurate. o Yield: The total volume of the whole fish input is lower than the total volume of frozen pangasius fillet products and by-products. In analogous circumstances, Commerce has found this to be a mathematical impossibility and applied AFA.12 Consistent with this precedent, Commerce should similarly reject NTSF’s FOP database, as the material imbalance proves that FOPs and by-products are not accurately presented. o Yield Tests/Adjustments: Commerce’s yield tests at verification show that the by- products and the fillet would have picked up very little water on a per-kilogram (kg) basis. Even when the output weights are adjusted to account for any processing water weight gain, the tests still reveal that NTSF’s reported outputs are greater than its inputs. o Basket Draining: NTSF’s claim that it sprays certain by-products during production, or moves such by-products by water channels from the processing area to the by-products staging area, also does not explain why its reported outputs exceed its reported inputs.
Recommended publications
  • 10 Monograph Pangasius Djambal.Pdf
    Chheng P., Baran E., Touch B.T. 2004 Synthesis of all published information on catfish Pangasius djambal (“trey pra”) based on FishBase 2004. WorldFish Center and Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 9 pp. Technical Assistance funded by the Asian Development Bank (TA nº T4025-CAM) Introduction This document results from the extraction and the editing by the authors of the information available in FishBase 2004. FishBase is a biological database on fishes developed by the WorldFish Center (formerly ICLARM, the International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management) in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and with the support of the European Commission (EC). These synopses present a standardized printout of the information on the above-mentioned species incorporated in FishBase as of 11 May 2004, is inspired from the format suggested for such documents by H. Rosa Jr. (1965, FAO Fish. Syn. (1) Rev 1, 84 p.). We cannot guarantee the total accuracy of the information herein; also we are aware that it is incomplete and readers are invited to send complementary information and/or corrections, preferably in form of reprints or reports to the FishBase Project, WorldFish Center, MC P.O. Box 2631, Makati, Metro Manila 0718, Philippines. Some hints on how to use the synopses The following definitions are meant to help you better understand the way this synopsis presents information and document its sources. Please refer to the FishBase book for more details; and do not hesitate to contact FishBase staff if you have suggestions or information that would improve the format or the contents of this synopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Pangasius Pangasius ERSS
    Punagas (Pangasius pangasius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, May 2011 Revised, August 2018 Web Version, 2/10/2021 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: Uncertain Photo: Anustee Maity Jana. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC. Available: http://www.fishbase.se/photos/UploadedBy.php?autoctr=31273&win=uploaded. (August 24, 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018a): “Asia: large rivers of Indian subcontinent [including Pakistan] and Myanmar (Ganges, Krishna?, Godavari, Irrawaddy). […] Reports from Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia are based on misidentifications.” “[In Bangladesh:] Found in Choto Jamuna river [sic] [Galib et al. 2013]. Occurs in the Ganges River.” “[In India:] Known throughout India [Shaji et al. 2000]. Found in Bihar, Darjeeling, Assam, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Chennai, West Bengal, Rohini and Rapti river [sic] in Uttar Pradesh and Gangetic estuary [Kapoor et al. 2002]. Recorded from Chilka Lake [Rao 1995].” 1 “[In Myanmar:] Occurs in Irrawaddy basin [Vidthayanon et al. 2005].” “[In Nepal:] Occurs in Koshi, Narayani and Bagmati rivers [Shrestha 2008].” Status in the United States No records of Pangasius pangasius in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. Pangasius pangasius falls within Group I of New Mexico’s Department of Game and Fish Director’s Species Importation List (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 2010). Group I species “are designated semi-domesticated animals and do not require an importation permit.” With the added restriction of “Not to be used as bait fish.” Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Pangasius pangasius in the wild in the United States were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Performance of Thai Pangus (Pangasius Hypophthalmus) in Polyculture System Using Different Supplementary Feeds
    Univ. j. zool. Rajshahi Univ. Vol. 27, 2008 pp. 59-62 ISSN 1023-6104 http://journals.sfu.ca/bd/index.php/UJZRU © Rajshahi University Zoological Society Growth performance of thai pangus (pangasius hypophthalmus) in polyculture system using different supplementary feeds M. A. B. Sayeed, G. S. Hossain, S. K. Mistry and K. A. Huq Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Life Science School, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh. Abstract: Thai pangus polyculture with carps has been increasing for its high potential, however very few attempts were made to compare its growth using different types of feed. A research was undertaken to assess the effect of three types of feed on growth of Thai pangus (Pangasius hypophthalmus) and rohu (Labeo rohita) in polyculture system for 11 months from 15 May 2005 to 15 April 2006 in Khulna. Growth performance using Hand-made Feed (F1) was compared with two commercial fish feed, Sunney Feed (F2) and Saudi-Bangla Feed (F3) in three respective treatments of T1, T2 and T3. All treatments were carried out in triplicate at 24700/ha for Thai pangus and 4940/ha for rohu. Average initial weight of Thai pangus and rohu were 4.5 and 33.5g respectively. Growth performance was influenced by feed type. Average final weight of Thai pangus and rohu were 820 and 710; 846 and 770; and 872 and 717g with specific growth rate 1.58 and -1 0.93; 1.59 and 0.95 and 1.60 and 0.93 % day in T1, T2 and T3 respectively. Feed conversion ratio was estimated 2.3 in T1, 2.1 in T2 and 1.96 in T3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Pangasius Fish in Restaurants Danni Wang
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2015 The Use of Pangasius Fish in Restaurants Danni Wang Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HUMAN SCIENCES THE USE OF PANGASIUS FISH IN RESTAURANTS By DANNI WANG A Thesis submitted to the Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2015 Danni Wang defended this thesis on June 2, 2015. The members of the supervisory committee were: Yun-Hwa Peggy Hsieh Professor Directing Thesis Shridhar Sathe Committee Member Michael Shatruk Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii Dedicated to My grandmother Ping Ding and my grandfather Zhijiu Wang, “The dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it”, May you rest in peace as memories of you live on. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My deepest gratitude goes to my advisor, Dr. Yun-Hwa Peggy Hsieh. None of these could have been possible without her insightful guidance and invaluable support. As a role model for me, she is an intelligent and considerate person, who has strong scientific commitment and always seeks to help others. Thank you for guiding me for my study and encouraging me when I was upset. This two years will be a memory for a life time. I would like to thank my committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India
    Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India Hkkd`vuqi ICAR National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India Hkkd`vuqi ICAR National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India, NBFGR Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India This publication is based on the outcome of several workshops on conservation categorization and management of freshwater fishes of India and inputs from fisheries experts of the country. 2010 ISBN: 978-81-905540-5-3 NBFGR Publ. Prepared by Dr. W.S. Lakra Dr. U.K. Sarkar Dr. A.Gopalakrishnan Sh. A.Kathirvelpandian No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by Dr. W.S. Lakra Director, NBFGR Canal Ring Road Lucknow-226002, U.P., India Cover design Sh. Ravi Kumar Cover photo Freshwater catfish -Bagarius bagarius Printed at Army Printing Press, 33 Nehru Road, Sadar Cantt.Lucknow-226 002 Tel : 0522-22481164 Threatened Freshwater Fishes of India, NBFGR Contents Preface i 1. Introduction 1 2. IUCN Red List System 1 3. Status of Fish Genetic Resources- Global Scenario 2 4. Conservation Assessment Efforts at NBFGR, Lucknow 3 5. Methodology of Assessing Conservation Status 4 6. Conclusion 5 7. References 6 8. Conservation Assessment Criteria's 8 9. List of Freshwater Fish Species of India under Threatened Category 11 10. List of Fish Species under Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 19 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmed Pangasius Swai (Pangasius Hypophthalmus) Basa (Pangasius Bocourti)
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report Farmed Pangasius Swai (Pangasius hypophthalmus) Basa (Pangasius bocourti) © Scandinavian Fishing Yearbook/www.scanfish.com Final Report August 26, 2005 Updated December 11, 2007 Teresa Ish, Director of Science, and Katy Doctor, Science Intern Sustainable Fishery Advocates Pangasius Seafood Report December 11, 2007 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives,” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY of EMERGING DISEASES and DISORDERS in CAGE CULTURED Pangasius Spp
    EPIDEMIOLOGY OF EMERGING DISEASES AND DISORDERS IN CAGE CULTURED Pangasius spp. IN PAHANG, MALAYSIA BY NUR SYAKEERA BINTI MAHMUD A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science (Biotechnology) Kulliyyah of Science International Islamic University Malaysia JULY 2019 ABSTRACT Pangasius hypophthalmus or famously known by local Malaysians as Patin Hitam is one of the most important sources of food in Malaysia. It is widely cultured in the Peninsular Malaysia especially in Pahang due to the fact that it is a popular consumed freshwater fish. Global economic interest in the fish has increased based on increasing demand in USA and Europe countries. However, high mortality rate of the fish due to bacterial and viral infections gave a negative impact towards the interest which needs to be solved. Therefore, bacteria in P. hypophthalmus in Pahang were being focused including risk factors associated to the prevalence of bacteria and virus in P. hypophthalmus. This research was conducted for two cycles (February – September 2016 and January – August 2017) in several different farms in Temerloh and Pekan, Pahang. Bacteria and virus samples were taken from three organs of P. hypophthalmus; kidney, liver and spleen. Physical parameters for water quality were measured using a multi-parameter probe sensor (YSI, USA) and chemical parameters were analyzed with DR900 colorimeter (Hach, USA). Bacteria samples were identified using biochemical test kits, API 20NE and 20E, followed by confirmation of the bacteria using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Virus samples were identified using conventional PCR. There were several bacteria isolated throughout the culture period. The highest prevalence of bacteria found was Aeromonas hydrophila (63%) followed by Photobacterium damselae (23%), Plesiomonas shigelloides (7%), Pseudomonas luteola (4%) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fish in Vietnamese Mekong
    International Conference on Biological, Environment and Food Engineering (BEFE-2015) May 15-16, 2015 Singapore Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fish in Vietnamese Mekong Vu Dang Ha Quyen1,2, Thai Thi Lan Phuong2, Truong Thi Oanh2, Tran Linh Thuoc1, Dang Thuy Binh2 specimen identification and assessment of stock structure [3]. Abstract—The Mekong River Basin represents a global hotspot Presently, the barcode analysis is a cost-effective option for of aquatic biodiversity second only to the Amazon River in terms of species identification in some situations and this will total fish species richness. Our study focuses on phylogeny of increasingly be the case as reference libraries are assembled freshwater fish in Vietmamese Mekong. Freshwater fish species were and analytical protocols are simplified [4]. The method sampling at 7 Provinces along Hau and Tien rivers. Morphologically, 11 species have been identified. Phylogenetic trees were constructed promises fast and accurate species identifications by focusing based on 16S and CO1 gene of mitochondrial DNA using Maximum analysis on a short standardized segment of the genome [2]. Parimony, Maximum Lilikehood and Baeysian Inference approaches. DNA barcodes have been obtained for more than 8000 The 16S phylogram performed similar phylogenetic relationships of species of fish and the CO1 sequences deposited in the CO1 phylogeny, excluding difference in position of Coilia species Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) online workbench and (family Engraulidae) and Acantopsis (family Cobotidae). Our results repository [5], [6] built up the barcode for fish in Lake Laut corroborate the monophyletic status at genus level (includes: Pangasius, Ompok, Acantopis, Trichopodus, Glossogobius, Coilia, Tawar, Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hamilton, 1822), a Threatened Fish of Indian Subcontinent Sandipan Gupta* ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata-700120, India
    e Rese tur arc ul h c & a u D q e A v e f l o o Gupta, J Aquac Res Development 2016, 7:2 l p a m n Journal of Aquaculture r e u n o t DOI: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000400 J ISSN: 2155-9546 Research & Development Short Communication OpenOpen Access Access Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton, 1822), A Threatened Fish of Indian Subcontinent Sandipan Gupta* ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata-700120, India Abstract Pangasius pangasius is a catfish species which is widely distributed in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Myanmar, Malaya-peninsula, Indonesia, Vietnam, Java and Thailand. It is a popular food fish as having good taste with high protein, mineral and fat content in its flesh. It is also a popular game fish and recently has got its entry in ornamental fish markets too. Pangasius pangasius is very hardy in nature; has high tolerance for temperature, salinity and turbidity; but due to over exploitation, habitat degradation, water pollution, destruction of the breeding grounds etc. natural populations of this fish species are facing the threat of extinction and its now high time to take proper measures on serious note to conserve its natural population. The present report has been prepared with the aim to sum up the available information on different aspects of Pangasius pangasius along with noting down the possible measures that should be taken into consideration for its conservation. Keywords: Pangasius pangasius; Catfish; Threatened; Conservation Distribution Species Introduction Pangasius pangasius is widely distributed in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Myanmar, Malaya-peninsula, Indonesia, Vietnam, Java and Pangasius pangasius (Hamilton, 1822) is a catfish species of the Thailand [1,7,10-15].
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Threaten Fish Species in Narsunda River
    Research in ISSN : P-2409-0603, E-2409-9325 AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK and FISHERIES An Open Access Peer Reviewed Journal Open Access Res. Agric. Livest. Fish. Research Article Vol. 5, No. 2, August 2018 : 259-268. STATUS OF THREATEN FISH SPECIES IN NARSUNDA RIVER Fahimul Arefin1*, Md. Moniruzzaman2, Saymuna Tarin Lupa2, Md. Ashikur Rahman2, Ariful Islam3 and Shirin Akter4 1Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Bangladesh; 2Scientific Officer, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Mymensingh-2201; 3Department of Fisheries Management, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202; 4Lecturer, Department of Fisheries and Marine Bioscience, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalgonj-8100, Bangladesh. *Corresponding author: Fahimul Arefin; E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received To identify the threatened fish species and focus on fish biodiversity conservation in the 04 August, 2018 Narsunda River Kishoreganj Sadar, Kishoreganj district, the present study was conducted for a time period of 6 months (April-November, 2012). A total of 23 threatened fish Accepted 16 August, 2018 species were identified in the river among them, 9 vulnerable, 11 endangered and 3 critically endangered species as well as 8 exotic fish species were also found in the River. Online 30 August, 2018 The fishing gears used by the fishermen in Narsunda River includes 4 types of nets, 3 types of traps, 3 hooks and lines and 2 types of wounding gears whereas major fishing Key words craft and gears were mainly wooden boat and seine net (locally called ‘ber jal’) Biodiversity respectively. Due to environmental degradation and manmade causes the biodiversity of Threatened fish this river decreasing day by day and it could be minimized by proper management and Narsunda river conservation techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Pangasiidae Bleeker, 1858
    FAMILY Pangasiidae Bleeker, 1858 - pangasid catfishes, shark catfishes [=Pangasini, Pangasianodonidi] GENUS Helicophagus Bleeker, 1857 - shark catfishes Species Helicophagus leptorhynchus Ng & Kottelat, 2000 - Mun River shark catfish Species Helicophagus typus Bleeker, 1857 - Mussi River shark catfish Species Helicophagus waandersii Bleeker, 1858 - Sumatran shark catfish GENUS Pangasianodon Chevey, 1931 - shark catfishes Species Pangasianodon gigas Chevey, 1931 - giant Mekong catfish [=paucidens] Species Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) - striped catfish [=sutchi] GENUS Pangasius Valenciennes, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840 - shark catfishes [=Neopangasius, Pseudopangasius, Sinopangasius] Species Pangasius bocourti Sauvage, 1880 - basa fish [=altifrons] Species Pangasius conchophilus Roberts & Vidthayanon, 1991 - Thabo shark catfish Species Pangasius djambal Bleeker, 1846 - Javan pangasius [=bedado] Species Pangasius elongatus Pouyaud et al., 2002 - Lower Mekong pangasius Species Pangasius humeralis Roberts, 1989 - Kapuas pangasius Species Pangasius kinabatanganensis Roberts & Vidthayanon, 1991 - Kinabatangan shark catfish Species Pangasius krempfi Fang & Chaux, in Chaux & Fang, 1949 - Krempf's pangasius [=semicultratus] Species Pangasius kunyit Pouyaud et al., 1999 - Kalimantan pangasius Species Pangasius larnaudii Bocourt, 1866 - spot pangasius [=burgini, taeniura] Species Pangasius lithostoma Roberts, 1989 - Robert's Kapuas pangasius Species Pangasius macronema Bleeker, 1850 - Chao Phraya shark catfish [=aequilabialis, siamensis]
    [Show full text]
  • (Pangasius Larnaudii) ERSS
    Spot Pangasius (Pangasius larnaudii) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2012 Revised, August 2018 Web Version, 5/1/2020 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: Uncertain Image: FAO. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 3.0. Available: http://www.fishbase.se/photos/PicturesSummary.php?StartRow=3&ID=12000&what=species&T otRec=5. (August 22, 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Asia: Mekong and Chao Phraya basins [Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam].” 1 “[In Cambodia:] Occurs in the Mekong basin [Rainboth 1996; Kottelat 1998]. Found below the Khone Falls to the Tonle Sap River, the Great Lake [Hill and Hill 1994].” “[In Laos:] Occurs in the Mekong tributary, the lower Xe Bangfai basin [Kottelat 1998]. Found in the Khone Falls [Hill and Hill 1994]. Collected from Tha Ngon in the Mekong basin [Taki 1974] and from Ban Hang Khone, a village on an island in the middle of the mainstream Mekong River just below the Great Khone Waterfalls in Khong District, Champasak Province [Baird 1998]. Enters flooded forest in Ban Hang Khone, Don Khone, just below the great waterfalls at Lee Pee [Roberts 1993].” “[In Thailand:] Occurs in the Mekong and Chao Phraya basins [Kottelat 1998] and Maeklong basin [Vidthayanon et al. 1997]. Reported from Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Chai Nat, Ubon Ratchathani, and Nong Khai [Monkolprasit et al. 1997].” “[In Vietnam:] Occurs in the Mekong basin [Kottelat 1998].” Status in the United States No records of Pangasius larnaudii in the wild or in trade in the United States were found.
    [Show full text]