DOCSLIB.ORG

Exodus Intro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Intro to Exodus (Prepared by Pastor David Anglin) The Hebrew Bible- TANAK (Torah, Nevi’im, Kutu’vim) English Bible- Pentateuch, Hist, Poetry, Prophets The TANAK and English Bible have the same books but they are arranged slightly different, as noted above. The Torah (refers to the Law) and Pentateuch (means 5 law books) are the first 5 books of the OT (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy), are traditionally attributed to the Authorship of Moses. The Bible is vitally important for 2 reasons: 1) It provides a Real History (unbiased) 2) It provides a Redemptive History Brief Historical Overview of Israel’s History: Historical Context God’s promises to Abraham and His descendants: Abrahams calling around 2090 B.C. Genesis 12:1-3- ”Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. 2 And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. 3 I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” Genesis 15:12-16- “12 As the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell on Abram. And behold, dreadful and great darkness fell upon him. 13 Then the Lord said to Abram, “Know for certain that your offspring will be sojourners in a land that is not theirs and will be servants there, and they will be afflicted for four hundred years. 14 But I will bring judgment on the nation that they serve, and afterward they shall come out with great possessions. 15 As for you, you shall go to your fathers in peace; you shall be buried in a good old age. 16 And they shall come back here in the fourth generation, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete.” Jacob arrives in Egypt around 1875 B.C. Genesis 50 ends with the sons of Israel living with wealth, privilege, and influence as Joseph is the all- powerful prime minister of Egypt. Joseph dies, and his people grow in numbers over the next centuries. One Pharaoh’s Dynasty ends and another begins. Nationalism and Xenophobia (fear of people from other countries) takes over and the Pharaoh uses this to his advantage by making this surging minority an endless pool of cheap labor to build his great cities. They experience not just slavery but severe oppression and even the King ordering His servants to murder the new born infant males. Authorship: Moses John 1:17 17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. Liberal/Cristical Scholars have attacked Mosaic Authorship seeking to discredit the authenticity and authority of the Bible. The most notable attack is referred to as the theory of Wellhausen, also the JEDP Theory or the Documentary Hypothesis. The JEDP Theory has been thoroughly challenged and discredited but nonetheless has continued to find its way into discussions about the Torah. The reality is there is no other suitable option for denying Mosaic Authorship so the ghost of Wellhausen continues to be used to discredit the Bible. No seriously objective informed academic still uses this theory. Only liberal professor in seminaries, Bible Colleges, and Universities who continue to parrot the arguments without showing how it has been easily been debunked. Below are some of the evidences for Mosaic Authorship. Evidences of Mosaic Authorship Evidence for the Mosaic Authorship of the Pentateuch From Dr. Stephen Miller’s OT Survey Notes 1) The Pentateuch itself claims that Moses wrote it. In Exodus, the text says that God spoke to Moses and gave him the pattern for the tabernacle (Ex. 25:1, 8-9, 40; see also Exod. 20-23; 24:4, 7; 25-31). Leviticus and Numbers are said to have been given by God to Moses. Numerous times in many different ways it is stated in the Pentateuch that the Lord spoke to Moses, In Deuteronomy the text states that the speeches were delivered and written by Moses (e.g., Deut. 31:9, 24-26). 2) Elsewhere in the OT, the claim is made that Moses wrote the Pentateuch (e.g., Josh. 1:7; 8:32, 34; 22:5; Judg. 3:4; 1 Chron. 15:15; 2 Chron. 23:18; Dan. 9:11,13). 3) The NT claims that Moses wrote the Pentateuch: 1) Jesus (cf. Mark 12:26; John 5:46-47; Luke 16:29, 31; John 8:5; Matt 8:4; 19:7, 8; Luke 24:44). 2) Apostles (cf. Acts 15:21; 2 Cor. 3:15). 4) Tradition of the synagogue and church confirms the Mosaic view. Noggin acknowledges, “With very few exceptions, it has always been the view of the synagogue and the church that Moses is the author of the Pentateuch.” (Soggin, IOT, 80). Samples are: Samaritan Pentateuch, Ecclesiasticus 45:5 (2d cent. B.C.); 2 Mac. 7:30; Philo (Life of Moses 3:29), Josephus (Antiquities IV:8, 48); Palestinian and Babylonian talmud. 5) Internal Evidence 1) Portions of the Pentateuch indicate that is was written in the desert (Num 2:1ff.). 2) It was written by an eyewitness who preserved the local color, etc. of the journeys (“twelve springs and seventy palm trees,” Exod. 15:27). Portions of the Pentateuch are written like a diary. 3) It was written by an author who knew Egypt. Names like Moses and Potiphar are Egyptian. Watering with the foot (Deut. 11:10) is a reference to the irrigation practices of Egypt, not Palestine. 4) Archaisms are preserved. Although there is apparent modernization of spelling and place names, many ancient expressions are preserved in the Pentateuch. One of the best examples, the pronoun for “she” appears as hiw” instead of the usual hi” (H.H.Rowley, The Growth of the Old Testament, p 46). 6) Moses had the education and background to have written the Pentateuch. 7) There is no solid external objective evidence to deny the Mosiac tradition. No J document, P document, etc. have ever been found. 8) If the Documentary Hypothesis is true and Moses is not the author than the Pentateuch must be a manufactured history. 9) The documentary hypothesis in its Wellhausenian form denies special revelation and the supernatural. Meaning, the law is not a revelation of God to Moses, the miracles did not occur, and predictive prophecy in not possible. 10) Archaeological discoveries have confirmed the antiquity of the Pentateuch (e.g., Code of Hammurabi, tablets from Nuzi, Mari, Ebla, etc.). 11) Any theory based on an evolutionary development of Israel’s religion must be rejected. Israel’s religion was revealed, not developed by human trial and error. Dating the Exodus: (2 Schools of Thought) The Late Date: • Exodus occurred during the Pharaoh’s of the 19th Dynasty (1321-1205 B.C.) • Built upon Rameses II (1300-1234 B.C.) Based upon Ex. 1:1 (Store houses of Pithom and Raameses). The Pharaoh having a long reign according to Ex. 2:32, and we know he reigned for around 65 years. What is at Stake? • After Amenhotep III’s reign (1421-1376 B.C.) Egypt goes through a period of decline and loosens its grip on Syria and Palenstine. • Amenhotep IV (1380-1362 B.C.) changes his name to Akhenaten (sun god). Akhenaten received letters from Palestine governors requesting help because of an invasion of a nomadic people known as the Habiru. Known as the Amarna Letters. The Early Date: • Exodus occurred during the Pharaoh’s of the 18th Dynasty (1580-1321 B.C.) • Thutmoses III (1501-1447 B.C.) thus making Amenhotep II (1447-1421 B.C.) • Also Hatshepsut (1501-1479 B.C.) would have likely been the daughter of Pharaoh who had the courage to defy her father and save the Hebrew baby in the basket. • Thutmoses was known to be more cruel than Rameses, hated foreigners, and there are paintings from his reign showing Semites working as slave laborers on his building projects. The Biblical Dating: Judges 11:26- “ While Israel lived in Heshbon and its villages, and in Aroer and its villages, and in all the cities that are on the banks of the Arnon, 300 years, why did you not deliver them within that time?” • Jepthah judged Israel around 1100 B.C. • 1100 + 300 years + 40 years of wandering = 1440 B.C. 1 Kings 6:1-“In the four hundred and eightieth year after the people of Israel came out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month of Ziv, which is the second month, he began to build the house of the Lord.” • The Temple is begun in the 4th year of Solomon’s reign, 480 years after the Exodus. • The years was 966 B.C. + 480 = approximately 1446 B.C. • Thutmoses died in 1447 B.C.= leaving the Exodus having taken place between 1447-1445 B.C. Acts 13:20- Ex. 1 - covers 4 centuries (430 years)- the people of God are dwelling in dark times. Ex. 2 - covers 80 years- God is working behind the scenes, sovereignly orchestrating His plan of deliverance. 80 years before Moses is called by God to set His people free God has already been working. Centuries of seemingly unheard prayers and God has not forgotten, God has some been deaf, and God has been Sovereignly working in the midst of darkness to bring forth the miraculous deliverance of His people. Moses becomes a murderer.
Recommended publications
  • SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch

    SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch

    SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch Note: Course content may be changed, term to term, without notice. The information below is provided as a guide for course selection and is not binding in any form. SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch Course Number, Name, and Credit Hours BI-6630 Studies in the Pentateuch, 3 credit hours Course Description This course is an examination of the Pentateuch. It includes a review of the content and structure of the Pentateuch; an analysis of its meaning and function with respect to both its ancient Near Eastern and canonical context; careful examination of particular texts from various genres embedded within the Pentateuch; exploration of various themes; interaction with various methods of interpretation; and a consideration of how the Pentateuch relates to the New Testament and the contemporary church. Prerequisites: BI-5500 Hermeneutics and BI-5533 Old Testament History, Literature, and Theology. Course Objectives 1. Describe and locate the basic content, key themes and the flow of the Pentateuch (Knowledge and Understanding) 2. Express how key historical, archaeological, geographical, structural, and cultural background issues affect the Pentateuch and defend their view of authorship (Reflection and Critique) 3. Exegete a passage in the Pentateuch by utilizing a variety of methods and appropriately using digital resources in the process (Performance and Action) 4. Articulate a theological framework which clarifies and defines how the Pentateuch applies and functions authoritatively in the church (Commitment and Identity) 5. Integrate biblical knowledge into a ministry setting (Performance and Action) Course Textbook(s) and/or Supporting Information Required textbooks for all Moody Online classes can be found on the Required Textbooks section of the Moody website.
  • HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS in the SOLOMON NARRATIVE of 1 KINGS 1–11 John A

    HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS in the SOLOMON NARRATIVE of 1 KINGS 1–11 John A

    HEPTADIC VERBAL PATTERNS IN THE SOLOMON NARRATIVE OF 1 KINGS 1–11 John A. Davies Summary The narrative in 1 Kings 1–11 makes use of the literary device of sevenfold lists of items and sevenfold recurrences of Hebrew words and phrases. These heptadic patterns may contribute to the cohesion and sense of completeness of both the constituent pericopes and the narrative as a whole, enhancing the readerly experience. They may also serve to reinforce the creational symbolism of the Solomon narrative and in particular that of the description of the temple and its dedication. 1. Introduction One of the features of Hebrew narrative that deserves closer attention is the use (consciously or subconsciously) of numeric patterning at various levels. In narratives, there is, for example, frequently a threefold sequence, the so-called ‘Rule of Three’1 (Samuel’s three divine calls: 1 Samuel 3:8; three pourings of water into Elijah’s altar trench: 1 Kings 18:34; three successive companies of troops sent to Elijah: 2 Kings 1:13), or tens (ten divine speech acts in Genesis 1; ten generations from Adam to Noah, and from Noah to Abram; ten toledot [‘family accounts’] in Genesis). One of the numbers long recognised as holding a particular fascination for the biblical writers (and in this they were not alone in the ancient world) is the number seven. Seven 1 Vladimir Propp, Morphology of the Folktale (rev. edn; Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968; tr. from Russian, 1928): 74; Christopher Booker, The Seven Basic Plots of Literature: Why We Tell Stories (London: Continuum, 2004): 229-35; Richard D.
  • THE AUTHORSHIP of the PENTATEUCH: an OLD CRITICAL ISSUE THAT REFUSES to EXPIRE Vernon J

    THE AUTHORSHIP of the PENTATEUCH: an OLD CRITICAL ISSUE THAT REFUSES to EXPIRE Vernon J

    THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE PENTATEUCH: AN OLD CRITICAL ISSUE THAT REFUSES TO EXPIRE Vernon J. Steiner, Ph.D. The Emmaus Institute Lincoln, Nebraska 0. PREFACE The comparison is an unfortunate one, but taking up this topic reminds me of how a mortician might feel upon discovering that a cadaver in the advanced stages of rigor mortis continues to show signs of life. About the time one thinks all critical discussions on the history and authorship of the Pentateuch have died a long-overdue death, the topic suddenly sits up again as an interesting point of inquiry or even as a test of critical orthodoxy on the one hand or of Christian piety and scriptural fidelity on the other. This was brought to my attention again in a conversation just over a decade ago which reminded me of a course I endured early on in my graduate studies. That was in a previous millennium, at a time when the authorship of the Pentateuch was identified in conservative circles as one of four critical issues in the study of the Old Testament by which one’s commitment to the authority of Scripture could be measured (alongside the dating of the exodus, the authorship of Isaiah, and the dating of Daniel). The more recent exchange resulted in my being declined a teaching gig overseas, ostensibly because my views on the authorship of the Pentateuch did not align with the position espoused by the faculty of the school seeking my services as a visiting professor. The present piece, which many of my students have seen in one version or another over the decades, represents a kind of belated peace offering to my recent interlocutor and my earlier seminary professors.
  • The New 'Ain Dara Temple: Closest Solomonic Parallel1

    The New 'Ain Dara Temple: Closest Solomonic Parallel1

    The New ‘Ain Dara Temple: Closest Solomonic Parallel1 By John Monson A stunning parallel to Solomon’s Temple has been discovered in northern Syria. The temple at ‘Ain Dara has far more in common with the Jerusalem Temple described in the Book of Kings than any other known building. Yet the newly excavated temple has received almost no attention in this country, at least partially because the impressive excavation report, published a decade ago, was written in German by a Syrian scholar and archaeologist. For centuries, readers of the Bible have tried to envision Solomon’s glorious Jerusalem Temple, dedicated to the Israelite God, Yahweh. Nothing of Solomon’s Temple remains today; the Babylonians destroyed it utterly in 586 B.C.E. And the vivid Biblical descriptions are of limited help in reconstructing the building: Simply too many architectural terms have lost their meaning over the ensuing centuries, and too many details are absent from the text. Slowly, however, archaeologists are beginning to fill in the gaps in our knowledge of Solomon’s building project. For years, pride of place went to the temple at Tell Ta‘yinat, also in northern Syria. When it was discovered in 1936, the Tell Ta‘yinat temple, unlike the ‘Ain Dara temple, caused a sensation because of its similarities to Solomon’s Temple. Yet the ‘Ain Dara temple is closer in time to Solomon’s Temple by about a century (it is, in fact, essentially contemporaneous), is much closer in size to Solomon’s Temple than the smaller Tell Ta‘yinat temple, has several features found in Solomon’s Temple but not in the Tell Ta‘yinat temple, and is far better preserved than the Tell Ta‘yinat temple.
  • Bible Chronology of the Old Testament the Following Chronological List Is Adapted from the Chronological Bible

    Bible Chronology of the Old Testament the Following Chronological List Is Adapted from the Chronological Bible

    Old Testament Overview The Christian Bible is divided into two parts: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The word “testament” can also be translated as “covenant” or “relationship.” The Old Testament describes God’s covenant of law with the people of Israel. The New Testament describes God’s covenant of grace through Jesus Christ. When we accept Jesus as our Savior and Lord, we enter into a new relationship with God. Christians believe that ALL Scripture is “God-breathed.” God’s Word speaks to our lives, revealing God’s nature. The Lord desires to be in relationship with His people. By studying the Bible, we discover how to enter into right relationship with God. We also learn how Christians are called to live in God’s kingdom. The Old Testament is also called the Hebrew Bible. Jewish theologians use the Hebrew word “Tanakh.” The term describes the three divisions of the Old Testament: the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im), and the Writings (Ketuvim). “Tanakh” is composed of the first letters of each section. The Law in Hebrew is “Torah” which literally means “teaching.” In the Greek language, it is known as the Pentateuch. It comprises the first five books of the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. This section contains the stories of Creation, the patriarchs and matriarchs, the exodus from Egypt, and the giving of God’s Law, including the Ten Commandments. The Prophets cover Israel’s history from the time the Jews entered the Promised Land of Israel until the Babylonian captivity of Judah.
  • Authority of Scripture Authorized Versions of the Bible Authorship I. Ancient Near East and Hebrew Bible/ Old Testament

    Authority of Scripture Authorized Versions of the Bible Authorship I. Ancient Near East and Hebrew Bible/ Old Testament

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2011 Authorship Schmid, Konrad DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520260035027 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-50488 Book Section Published Version Originally published at: Schmid, Konrad (2011). Authorship. In: Spieckermann, Hermann. Encyclopeida of the Bible and Its Reception: Athena – Birkat ha-Minim. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 116-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520260035027 115 Authority of Scripture 116 Consequently, together with other state magis- or by his sources, judging by the use of the plural trates, the “elders” are accused of corruption by π λιτ!ραι (Acts 17 : 6, 8) and the characterization some of the prophets (Isa 3 : 2–3; Amos 5 : 10–15). of the politarchs as bearing responsibility for main- In Jerusalem, both Jesus and Paul are con- taining public peace and order (vv. 6–7) and setting fronted with the Jewish temple staff, spearheaded bond (v. 9). by the high priest and the local representatives of Paul is also repeatedly in contact with provincial the Roman Empire. Jesus is arrested on behalf of authorities on his journeys. On Malta, he and Bar- the high priests, scribes and elders (Mark 14: 43) nabas preach the gospel to the Roman governor Ser- and is interrogated by the Sanhedrin (Mark 14 : 53– gius Paulus (13 : 7). During his arrest in Caesarea Maritima, the apostle is questioned by the govern- 65) and the Roman governor (γεμν/praefectus) ors Felix and Festus (23 : 33–26 : 32).
  • BIBLICAL CRITICISM: a Traditionalist View

    BIBLICAL CRITICISM: a Traditionalist View

    Max Kapustin Biblical criticism, both in its "higher" and "lower" forms, has been one of the major sources of the assault on traditional Judaism in the modern era. Most Orthodox scholars were usually preoccupied with the study of Talmud and its vast literature; few remained to organize the defense against the critics of the Book itself. Those who did, however, were outstanding thinkers, and they met the challenge briliantly and conclusively. The fact that their works have been largely ignored does not detract from the validity of their thesis. Rabbi Max Kapustin, who here discusses their major contributions, out- lines the general attitude he believes traditional Jews ought to adopt to Biblical Criticism. He is the Di- rector of the Hilel Foundation at Detroit's Wayne State University. Ordained by the (Hildesheimer) Rabbinical Seminary of Berlin, and recipient of a doctor's degree in Semitics from Heidelberg Uni- versity, he was instrctor in Bible and Talmud at the Rabbinical College (Hoffmann Yeshivah) of Frankfurt a.M. He is the author of two works in rab.. binics. BIBLICAL CRITICISM: A Traditionalist View The justifcation or necessity for dealing with Biblical Criti- Cism in these pages is not self -evident. Work on the Bible offers rich rewards even without taking into consideration so-called critical problems. For a modern example we have only to turn to S. R. Hirsch's great commentary to the Pentateuch now being made accessible to the English reader.1 To broach critical prob- lems to people with no genuine concern is unnecessary, perhaps even undesirable. Yet whenever problems.
  • Deuteronomy 202 1 Edition Dr

    Deuteronomy 202 1 Edition Dr

    Notes on Deuteronomy 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE The title of this book in the Hebrew Bible was its first two words, 'elleh haddebarim, which translate into English as "these are the words" (1:1). Ancient Near Eastern suzerainty treaties began the same way.1 So the Jewish title gives a strong clue to the literary character of Deuteronomy. The English title comes from a Latinized form of the Septuagint (Greek) translation title. "Deuteronomy" means "second law" in Greek. We might suppose that this title arose from the idea that Deuteronomy records the law as Moses repeated it to the new generation of Israelites who were preparing to enter the land, but this is not the case. It came from a mistranslation of a phrase in 17:18. In that passage, God commanded Israel's kings to prepare "a copy of this law" for themselves. The Septuagint translators mistakenly rendered this phrase "this second [repeated] law." The Vulgate (Latin) translation, influenced by the Septuagint, translated the phrase "second law" as deuteronomium, from which "Deuteronomy" is a transliteration. The Book of Deuteronomy is, to some extent, however, a repetition to the new generation of the Law that God gave at Mt. Sinai. For example, about 50 percent of the "Book of the Covenant" (Exod. 20:23— 23:33) is paralleled in Deuteronomy.2 Thus God overruled the translators' error, and gave us a title for the book in English that is appropriate, in view of the contents of the book.3 1Meredith G. Kline, "Deuteronomy," in The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, p.
  • The Building of the First Temple

    The Building of the First Temple

    Forschungen zum Alten Testament Herausgegeben von Konrad Schmid (Zürich) · Mark S. Smith (New York) Hermann Spieckermann (Göttingen) 103 Peter Dubovsky´ The Building of the First Temple A Study in Redactional, Text-Critical and Historical Perspective Mohr Siebeck Peter Dubovsky´, born 1965; 1999 SSL; 2005 ThD; currently dean at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome and professor of the Old Testament and history. ISBN 978-3-16-153837-7 ISSN 0940-4155 (Forschungen zum Alten Testament) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio- graphie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohr.de This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Gulde Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. To my friend John W. O’Malley Preface The project that led to this book started in 2008 when I was preparing a course on 1 Kings 1–11 at the Pontifical Biblical Institute. It was completed thanks to a generous grant from Georgetown University, which offered me a Jesuit Chair (2014). This book would not have been possible without the constant support of my fellow Jesuits, my colleagues at the Pontifical Biblical Institute, and
  • Authorship of the Pentateuch

    Authorship of the Pentateuch

    M. Bajić: Authorship of the Pentateuch Authorship of the Pentateuch Monika Bajić Biblijski institut, Zagreb [email protected] UDK:27-242 Professional paper Received: April, 2016 Accepted: October, 2016 Summary This piece is a concise summary of the historical and contemporary develo- pment of Pentateuch studies in Old Testament Theology. This article aims to provide information on the possible confirmation of Mosaic authorship. The purpose is to examine how the Documentary Hypothesis, Fragment and Su- pplemental Hypotheses, Form and Traditio-Historical Criticism, Canonical and Literary Criticism have helped to reveal or identify the identity of the author of the Torah. To better understand the mentioned hypotheses, this article presents a brief description of the J, E, D, and P sources. Key words: Pentateuch, authorship, Mosaic authorship, Torah, Documen- tary Hypothesis, Fragment and Supplemental Hypothesis, Form and Tradi- tio-Historical Criticism, Canonical and Literary Criticism. In the most literal sense, the Pentateuch 1 (or Torah) is an anonymous work, but traditional views support the belief of Mosaic authorship (Carpenter 1986, 751- 52). Yet, with the advent of humanism and the Renaissance, the sense of intellec- tual freedom and upswing in research have led to the fact that many have begun to read the Bible critically, trying to challenge its text as well as the traditions and beliefs that are formed from it (Alexander 2003, 61-63). One of the most commonly attacked beliefs is Moses’ authorship of the Torah. There has been an 1 Taken from the Greek translation LXX. Pentateuch is derived from the Greek word pentateu- chos, which means a five-book work, known as the Books of Moses (Carpenter 1986).
  • Menorah I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament II. Judaism

    Menorah I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament II. Judaism

    645 Menorah 646 tory of the Anabaptists and the Mennonites (Scottdale, Pa. 1993). cal Jewish interpretation of the Exodus texts, which ■ Loewen R./C. Snyder, Seeking Places of Peace: Global Mennonite present contradictory information about the num- History Series: North America (Intercourse, Pa. 2012). ■ Valla- ber and shape of the lamps. The menorah was dares, J. P., Mission and Migration: Global Mennonite History among the objects taken from the temple by Antio- Series: Latin America (Intercourse, Pa. 2010). chus Epiphanes in 167 BCE (1 Macc 1:21; Josephus Derek Cooper Ant. 12.250). Whereas 1 Macc used the singular See also / Anabaptists; / Hutterites; / Ley- form, Josephus mentions that menorot were re- den, Jan van; / Reformation moved. The Maccabean restoration of the temple in- cluded an improvised menorah of iron rods overlaid with tin (bMen 28b). That these rods numbered Menorah seven (MegTa 9) is the first mention of a seven- branched menorah in the Hasmonean period I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament (Hachlili: 22). After Judas Maccabeus purified the II. Judaism III. Christianity temple in 165 BCE, new sacred objects were made IV. Visual Arts for it including a menorah (1 Macc 4:49). This men- orah apparently had seven branches because multi- I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament ple lamps were lit on the menorah to provide light for the temple (v. 50). In 39 BCE the menorah The Hebrew word me˘nôrâ (LXX λυχνία) refers gener- paired with the table of showbread appeared on a ally to a lampstand whose function was to light a lepton coin issued by Mattathias Antigonos (40–37 room (2 Kgs 4:10).
  • 316 Chronology: Timeline of Biblical World History Biblestudying.Net

    316 Chronology: Timeline of Biblical World History Biblestudying.Net

    Chronology 316: Timeline of Biblical World History biblestudying.net Brian K. McPherson and Scott McPherson Copyright 2012 Period Two: From the Birth of Isaac to the Exodus In this section of our study we will present the scriptural data that is relevant to calculating the amount of time from the birth of Isaac to the Israelite Exodus from Egypt. Although it is necessary to do some cross-referencing and comparison of scriptural texts, our discussion of this time period will be simpler than our examination of factors related to the prior period. We will start with Genesis 15:13-16. In Genesis 15:13-16, God tells Abraham that his descendents will be servants in a land that is not their own (Egypt) for 400 years and that they will come out in the fourth generation. Genesis 15:13 And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; 14 And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. 15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age. 16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. This passage provides the basic data to begin our understanding of the duration of time from Isaac’s birth to the Exodus. From this passage we learn several things.