Babesch Nieuw Nummer Leeg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Babesch Nieuw Nummer Leeg BABESCH 89 (2014), 1-25. doi: 10.2143/BAB.89.0.3034667 New attributions to the Sappho-Diosphos Painters’ workshop A group of black-figure kyathoi reconsidered Delphine Madina Tonglet Abstract* This paper proposes to attribute, for the first time, three Attic kyathoi to the Sappho Painter and gathers together other vases that may belong to this late black-figure workshop (end of the 6th- beginning of the 5th century BC). It further confirms through the study of figured decoration and shape that an important part of Attic kyathoi manufactured in this workshop was a legacy left by Psiax, a hypothesis already suggested for a few pieces by C. Jubier-Galinier. A study of shape makes it possible to group vases which would not be comparable on stylis- tic grounds alone, and it reinforces previous stylistic comparisons of figured decorations. It also points out the importance of the potter’s work in the organization and understanding of Attic ceramic workshops. À la mémoire de mon ami Jérôme Andronikos INTRODUCTION** theless, it seems now possible to dissociate sev- eral Attic kyathoi from Nikosthenes’ workshop From the 19th century onwards, stylistic studies of and therefore, explain the important typological Attic figured vases have been the main approach difference between the distinctive Nikosthenic for understanding and defining Athenian work- profile and the rounded shapes of the later prod- shops. However, another methodology based on ucts.5 vases’ morphology and potter work has already The Sappho and Diosphos Painters were late shown its efficacy in the pioneering works of black-figure craftsmen, whose workshop flour- C.H.E. Haspels and then of H. Bloesch. Later, this ished at the end of the 6th century BC, at a time meth odology has been developed by D.C. Kurtz when the new red-figure technique was already on lekythoi, H.A.G. Brijder on Siana cups, J. Euwe dominant in the Kerameikos. They are usually on Nolan amphorae and E.A. Mackay on Exekias’ considered to be the disciples of Psiax. Their production.1 products share similar shapes - lekythoi, alabastra, This approach, based on the analysis of drawn mastoi, skyphoi and plates - as well as a preference profiles, combined with the classical stylistic and for the white-ground technique and other stylis- iconographic study, allows for the first time the tic and iconographic features.6 J.D. Beazley origi- attribution of kyathoi to the Sappho Painter and his nally defined the workshop as based on the coop- workshop. Though archaeological finds of Greek eration of two painters, the Sappho and Diosphos pottery workshops are lacking for the archaic Painters, as two distinct painting styles can be period, it has been shown that this combination recognized on lekythoi of very similar shapes. of stylistic, iconographic and morphologic stud- Therefore, Beazley inferred that these two painters ies enable us to detect craftsmen connections and were working for a common craftsman, identified to approach their organization in different work- as the Diosphos potter, the maker of the lekythoi shops (intended as physical places), where sev- of DL and of Little-Lion Classes.7 eral painters could work around one or several More recently, C. Jubier-Galinier has shown potters, or where craftsmen were processing the that a minute analysis of the lekythoi (the most sig- entire chaîne opératoire of their production.2 nificant shape of the workshop) and their profiles According to Kurtz, Psiax was among the best demonstrates the involvement of two potters’ and most influential painters of Attic kyathoi.3 hands, which coincide with the two painting This is often obscured by the ‘fame’ attributed to styles already identified by Beazley.8 For both Nikosthenes’ kyathoi production, primarily in M. classes of lekythoi, it is possible to observe coin- Eisman’s important work on Attic kyathoi.4 Never - ciding morphological features (articulation, pro- 1 portions, etc.), secondary decoration and figured technique is black-figure on white-ground with style. Jubier-Galinier concludes that the workshop details in added white and red paint. was composed of two main craftsmen who con- The central scene represents a woman sitting trolled the entire chaîne opératoire: the Sappho and and playing the lyre in front of a dancing woman Diosphos Potters-Painters. At the same time, sec- who holds krotala; while under the handle two ondary craftsmen, the so-called ‘companions’,9 doves are painted with unfolded wings. The nu - also manufactured and decorated lekythoi of the merous and careful incisions as well as the poly- same types (Little-Lion Class, Group Hound and chromy of the painting and the detailed ornamen- Hare).10 With the disappearance of the Sappho tation, recall Psiax’s style. However, as already Painter, the workshop became dominated by the noted by Iozzo, the kyathos is not painted by Psiax Diosphos and Haimon Potters-Painters, until the himself,14 the drawing of the faces and hair being former disappeared and the latter took over the much different from his usual style, with simpler workshop.11 The study of the shape of other vases and thicker incisions. such as the kyathoi further confirms this frame- On the basis of stylistic and morphological anal - work and points to several connections between yses, it is possible to associate this vase with two potters and painters within the Athenian Kera - other kyathoi: an unpublished kyathos in Munich meikos. (Cat. 2, pl. 1) and the fragments of another vase (Cat. 3, pl. 1), recently found among unpublished 1. NEW ATTRIBUTIONS TO THE SAPPHO PAINTER (plate fragments of the Castellani Collection. 1, table 1)*** The kyathos in Munich (Cat. 2, tbl. 1) is not well known, since only one image is available in Eis - An Attic kyathos in the Vatican Museums, recently man’s dissertation.15 It shares several elements published by M. Iozzo, inspired the present study with the Vatican kyathos: the white-ground tech- (Cat. 1, pl. 1).12 While close to productions from nique, the style, the big eyes decoration of circles, Psiax’s circle, the vase combines morphological the conical foot and a similar size. Yet, the gen- features from both Psiax’s kyathoi (Cat. 4-5, pl. 2) eral profile of the bowl is only slightly different. and from later examples of the shape which seem The wall is broadly open and oblique, slightly to enter in the productions of the Sappho-Dios - flaring at the rim. The profile bulges delicately phos Painters’ workshop. towards the base and the bottom narrows Although the handle and several fragments of towards the foot. The lower part does not have the wall are missing, the profile of the Vatican the ‘bottleneck’ shape of Cat. 1. The foot spreads kyathos (Cat. 1, tbl. 1,) is well preserved.13 The wall directly from the bowl. It is composed of a of the upper part is concave, while a delicate bulge slightly concave conical part and a thick vertical swells the lower part. The convex bottom narrows section. The handle is lost. to a ‘bottleneck’ shape with a clear articulation The secondary decoration on the lower part and separating the bowl from the foot. The conical the foot is similar to that of the Vatican ky athos. The foot is made of a flaring ring (with a slight con- reserved bottom under the foot shows a central vex undulation) and a thick vertical section. black dot surrounded by a thick black ring. The secondary decoration is standard for a ky - The figured decoration follows the standard athos: the lower part of the bowl is black glazed scheme: two handle figures, two big eyes (with and highlighted by two reserved lines where the the same circles as on Cat. 1) and a central scene. wall is bulging. The upper spreading part of the Unlike the previous vase, no vegetal branches foot is black, while its vertical edge is reserved. decorate the background of the scene. Underneath the foot, the resting surface and the At the front, Theseus attacks a kneeling Mino - bottom of the bowl are reserved but the oblique taur, holding a sword in his right hand. Three par- section between them is painted black. On the allel blood spatters drop from the sword. The beast bottom, a black dot within a circle appears, in - tries to defend itself, brandishing a stone with the scribed within a larger black circle (same under- left hand. In an attempted escape, its legs are foot type as pl. 2, c). turned to the right. The hero wears a short chiton, The figured decoration follows a standardized an animal skin, and his hair is tied in a krobylos. scheme: two figures flanking the handle, large The Munich kyathos features an element rarely male eyes (with an external white circle, a black found on Attic black-figure kyathoi:16 an inscrip- circle and a central red dot for the pupil) and a tion. Indeed, hπαςκα. λ. ς is painted with black frontal scene. Between the eyes, some dotted glaze along the rim, on the frontal side of the branches adorn the background of the scene. The bowl. Behind Theseus’ head, above the large eye, 2 we can read: h πας. Then, above the Minotaur’s The three kyathoi within the production of the head we can easily guess the word κα. λ. ς, though Sappho Painter (plate 1, table. 1) the alpha, lambda and sigma are slightly erased.17 Two black-skinned sphinxes surround the han- There is no doubt that the three kyathoi described dle. Their shoulders are decorated with red dots, above are painted by the same hand and, in the while a row of small white dots runs down the following paragraphs, I propose to attribute them median band of the wings.
Recommended publications
  • Attic Black Figure from Samothrace
    ATTIC BLACK FIGURE FROM SAMOTHRACE (PLATES 51-56) 1 RAGMENTS of two large black-figure column-kraters,potted and painted about j1t the middle of the sixth century, have been recovered during recent excavations at Samothrace.' Most of these fragments come from an earth fill used for the terrace east of the Stoa.2 Non-joining fragments found in the area of the Arsinoeion in 1939 and in 1949 belong to one of these vessels.3 A few fragments of each krater show traces of burning, for either the clay is gray throughout or the glaze has cracked because of intense heat. The surface of many fragments is scratched and pitted in places, both inside and outside; the glaze and the accessory colors, especially the white, have sometimes flaked. and the foot of a man to right, then a woman A. Column krater with decoration continuing to right facing a man. Next is a man or youtlh around the vase. in a mantle facing a sphinx similar to one on a 1. 65.1057A, 65.1061, 72.5, 72.6, 72.7. nuptial lebes in Houston by the Painter of P1. 51 Louvre F 6 (P1. 53, a).4 Of our sphinx, its forelegs, its haunches articulated by three hori- P.H. 0.285, Diam. of foot 0.203, Th. at ground zontal lines with accessory red between them, line 0.090 m. and part of its tail are preserved. Between the Twenty-six joining pieces from the lower forelegs and haunches are splashes of black glaze portion of the figure zone and the foot with representing an imitation inscription.
    [Show full text]
  • VI the Voice of the Workshop: Signatures As a Source of Information on Potters, Painters and the Ways They Worked Together
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC) Stissi, V.V. Publication date 2002 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Stissi, V. V. (2002). Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 VI The voice of the workshop: signatures as a source of information on potters, painters and the ways they worked together 97 VI. 1 Introduction: much discussion, little progress
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquia Pontica Volume 10
    COLLOQUIA PONTICA VOLUME 10 ATTIC FINE POTTERY OF THE ARCHAIC TO HELLENISTIC PERIODS IN PHANAGORIA PHANAGORIA STUDIES, VOLUME 1 COLLOQUIA PONTICA Series on the Archaeology and Ancient History of the Black Sea Area Monograph Supplement of Ancient West & East Series Editor GOCHA R. TSETSKHLADZE (Australia) Editorial Board A. Avram (Romania/France), Sir John Boardman (UK), O. Doonan (USA), J.F. Hargrave (UK), J. Hind (UK), M. Kazanski (France), A.V. Podossinov (Russia) Advisory Board B. d’Agostino (Italy), P. Alexandrescu (Romania), S. Atasoy (Turkey), J.G. de Boer (The Netherlands), J. Bouzek (Czech Rep.), S. Burstein (USA), J. Carter (USA), A. Domínguez (Spain), C. Doumas (Greece), A. Fol (Bulgaria), J. Fossey (Canada), I. Gagoshidze (Georgia), M. Kerschner (Austria/Germany), M. Lazarov (Bulgaria), †P. Lévêque (France), J.-P. Morel (France), A. Rathje (Denmark), A. Sagona (Australia), S. Saprykin (Russia), T. Scholl (Poland), M.A. Tiverios (Greece), A. Wasowicz (Poland) ATTIC FINE POTTERY OF THE ARCHAIC TO HELLENISTIC PERIODS IN PHANAGORIA PHANAGORIA STUDIES, VOLUME 1 BY CATHERINE MORGAN EDITED BY G.R. TSETSKHLADZE BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2004 All correspondence for the Colloquia Pontica series should be addressed to: Aquisitions Editor/Classical Studies or Gocha R. Tsetskhladze Brill Academic Publishers Centre for Classics and Archaeology Plantijnstraat 2 The University of Melbourne P.O. Box 9000 Victoria 3010 2300 PA Leiden Australia The Netherlands Tel: +61 3 83445565 Fax: +31 (0)71 5317532 Fax: +61 3 83444161 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Illustration on the cover: Athenian vessel, end of the 5th-beg. of the 4th cent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lyre on the Ground
    Hyperboreus 18:1 (2012) Nina Almazova A LYRE ON THE GROUND To Prof. Dr. Heinz Heinen Among Attic red-fi gured vases from the Hermitage collection is a stemmed plate by the Dish Painter 1 dated to 470–460 BC. The painting in the interior (fi g. 1a) represents a bare-footed short-haired girl wearing a short high- girdled chiton and a diadem or a leaved fi llet. In a dance that resembles running she approaches a lyre lying on the ground and looks backwards. A ribbon is attached to the instrument; over the lyre there is an inscription in purple, all the letters of which are clearly visible: CORFELES. The content of this image has not been much discussed. The most detailed examination is that of Anna Peredolskaya in her Hermitage catalogue of red-fi gured Attic vases.2 Peredolskaya argues that the musical instrument3 decorated with a ribbon points rather to a cult dance with an accompaniment than to running. The glance of the girl is directed backwards, which makes it probable that she is being followed by someone; possibly, she is leading a chorus of young girls. The same explanation is implied by the inscription, which states clearly that the image deals with a chorus performance – though the translation given by Peredolskaya (‘идущая во главе хора’ – ‘leading a chorus’) is inadequate.4 The girl’s headgear which she calls “a golden diadem” points to a festive garment, according to Peredolskaya “a traditional garment of a young dancer”. Peredolskaya points out that the reason for placing the lyre on the ground is obscure.
    [Show full text]
  • VII Signatures, Attribution and the Size and Organisation of Workshops
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC) Stissi, V.V. Publication date 2002 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Stissi, V. V. (2002). Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:04 Oct 2021 VII Signatures, attribution and the size and organisation of workshops 123 VII.1 Signatures, cooperation and specialisation The signatures tell us something about more than only the personal backgrounds of potters and painters, individually or as a group.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum Poland Fascicule 11 Cracow Fascicule 1
    CORPUS VASORUM ANTIQUORUM POLAND FASCICULE 11 CRACOW FASCICULE 1 JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY 1 JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM UNION ACADÉMIQUE INTERNATIONALE CORPUS VASORUM ANTIQUORUM POLAND CRACOW FASCICULE 1 JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY 1 JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MUSEUM Ewdoksia PaPUCi-wŁadYka PUBLISHED BY THE POLISH ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES CRACOW 2012 POLAND, FASCICULE 11 CRACOW, FASCICULE 1 Editor of series: Ewdoksia Papuci-władyka Photographs: Paweł Gąsior, katarzyna Mirczak and Jakub Śliwa – institute of archaeology and Grzegorz Zygier JU Museum drawings and computer elaboration of photographs: Urszula socha Translation: agnieszka Fulińska Layout: Tomasz kulawik ISBN 978-83-7676-142-8 © Copyright: Polish academy of arts and sciences & Ewdoksia Papuci-władyka Printed in Poland Cracow 2012 To the Memory of Professor MARIA LUDWIKA BERNHARD PREFACE Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum has a long established tradition in Poland. The first three vol- umes were published before world war ii, in the years 1931-1936, and elaborated primarily by kazimierz Bulas and, to a lesser extent, by Edmund Bulanda, who took part in the project mostly in the capacity of the series editor. These volumes were published by the Polish acad- emy of arts and sciences (Polska akademia Umiejętności – PaU) in Cracow, under auspices of the Union académique internationale (Uai). They included not only the most prominent and most valuable collections, such as the famous Gołuchów collection of the Czartoryski family (volume 1), or the Cracow collection in the Princes Czartoryski Museum, but also smaller collections of the Jagiellonian University (JU) and the National Museum in Cracow (volume 2), and finally other small collections inw ilanów, Poznań, warsaw, Vilnius, Łańcut and many other places (volume 3).
    [Show full text]
  • I. Vase Shapes and Style of Painting and Drawing
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The Theseus Painter Style, Shapes and Iconography Borgers, O.E. Publication date 2003 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Borgers, O. E. (2003). The Theseus Painter: Style, Shapes and Iconography. Eigen Beheer. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 r r A.. SHAPES AND STYLE I.. VASE SHAPES AND STYLE OF PAINTING AND DRAWING G 1.. Shapes Inn contrast to most late black-figure painters and workshops, the Theseus Painter decorated a rather large varietyy of shapes. Latee black-figure painters tended to specialise in a few shapes, to a greater degree than iss generally the case in the run of Attic black-figure.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PERSIAN DESTRUCTION of ATHENS EVIDENCE from AGORA DEPOSITS (Plates8 1-84)
    THE PERSIAN DESTRUCTION OF ATHENS EVIDENCE FROM AGORA DEPOSITS (PLATEs8 1-84) APROBLEM of criticalimportance confronting all studentsof archaeologicalremains is the establishmentof chronology.1Excavators in the field assign dates to the ruined foundations of ancient buildings on the basis of independently dated artifacts found in associationwith the architecturalremains. Students of Greek sculptureand painting observe a sequence of developmentsin artisticstyle which suggeststhat a given work of art is earlier or later than another. Careful analysis of superimposedlayers of stratigraphyreveals the likelihood that certain kinds of pottery and certain forms of ceramic decoration were used earlier or later than others. All these procedures,however, serve to construct sequences of artifactsdatable only in relation to each other, and these objects can be assigned absolute dates only when the circumstancesof their deposit can be brought into relationwith known and dated events of Classicalantiquity. The need to establish such fixed points in the chronology of Athenian pottery was a guiding principle to the early excavatorsof the Athenian Agora. In the summer of 1932, in the second season of excavation, the discoveryof an enormous mass of broken pottery appearedto providejust such a relationbetween artifactsand historicalevents. The pottery had been dumped into a deep well cut in bedrock, which has come to be known as the RectangularRock-cut Shaft,2 and among the dumped material of its upper fill were found fifteen ostraka,of which eight bore the names of men known to have been ostracizedfrom Athens between 487 and 480 B.C.3 On the basis of this evidence, Eugene Vanderpool,in his publicationof the deposit,proposed to date the potteryof the upperfill to the decade between 490 and 480 B.C., and he suggested further that the deposit was closed at the time of the Persian destructionof Athens in 480/79 (p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconography of the Athenian Hero in Late Archaic Greek Vase-Painting
    The Iconography of the Athenian Hero in Late Archaic Greek Vase-Painting Elizabeth Anne Bartlett Tucson, Arizona Bachelor of Art, Scripps College, 2006 Master of Art, University of Arizona, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy McIntire Department of Art University of Virginia May 2015 ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ –ABSTRACT– This study questions how Athenian vase-painters represented heroic figures during the late sixth and early fifth centuries B.C. – specifically from the death of Peisistratos in 528 B.C. to the return of Theseus' bones to Athens in 475/4 B.C. The study focuses on three specific Attic cult heroes with a strong presence both in the Greek world and on Athenian vases: Herakles, Theseus, and Ajax. Although individual studies have been published regarding various aspects of these three heroes, such as subject matter, cult worship, literary presence, and social history, the current one departs from them by categorizing, comparing, and contrasting the different portrayals of the three chosen heroes. Using Athenian vases as the primary form of evidence, the current study endeavors to uncover how individual iconography can – or cannot – identify the heroic figure. By using an iconographic approach of looking at attributes, dress, gestures, poses, and composition, a more complete picture of the image of the hero may be understood. Evidence of both the cult of, and importance of, the Athenian hero is stressed both in ancient texts and through archaeological evidence, thus supplemental material is taken into consideration. Illustrations of Greek heroes can be found on a variety of vase shapes of various techniques, and the accompanying catalogue includes almost 300 examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Athenian little-master cups Heesen, P. Publication date 2009 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Heesen, P. (2009). Athenian little-master cups. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 9. EPITIMOS, EPITIMOS PAINTER, LYDOS, NIKOSTHENES, BMN PAINTER, ANAKLES, ANAKLES PAINTER (nos. 235-60; pls. 67-75) Introduction881 Three lip-cups show an epoiesen-signature of Epitimos (235-37, pls. 67-68). They were decorated by one painter, who was also responsible for unsigned lip-cups (238-41, pls. 69-70c) and a pyxis.882 J.D. Beazley named him the Epitimos Painter.883 The attribution of the lip-cups signed by Epitimos and the identity of the Epitimos Painter have been widely discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Masters, Pupils and Multiple Images in Greek Red-Figure Vase Painting
    MASTERS, PUPILS AND MULTIPLE IMAGES IN GREEK RED-FIGURE VASE PAINTING DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Sue Allen Hoyt, B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Mark D. Fullerton, Adviser Professor Timothy J. McNiven __________________________ Adviser Professor Howard Crane History of Art Graduate Program Text copyright by Sue Allen Hoyt 2006 ABSTRACT Little is known about Athenian vase-painting workshops of the 6th through 4th centuries BC. Almost no references exist in ancient literature, and there are few archaeological remains besides the vases themselves. I examined the technical details of vase-painting “copies”–images of uncommon scenes on vases by painted different painters– and compared the steps in the painting process, (especially the preliminary sketches), to see if these could supply any information about workshop practices. The research revealed that there are differences in sketches executed by different painters, and that there were often obvious differences in the care exercised in the different steps of the painting process. When the different steps consistently exhibit different levels of skill in execution, this suggests that workshops were organized so that workers with few skills performed the tasks that demanded the least; more-skilled workers painted the less-important borders etc., and the most-advanced painted the figures. On a few vases the sketch lines were more skillfully executed than the paintings that overlay them. Further, in the case of the Marsyas Painter and the Painter of Athens 1472, more than one pair of vases with replicated rare scenes ii exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and Economy in the Ancient World, Bd. 8
    Productivity of Athenian Vase-painters and Workshops Philip Sapirstein Introduction This paper examines the organization of the ancient Athenian pottery industry from a statistical perspective. My foundational research published in 2013 established a previously unrecognized pattern among vases attributed to Attic painters active between 600–400 BC by J.D. Beazley and later scholars.1 A regularity in the numbers of extant vases for each year a painter was active, defined as theannual attribution rate (henceforth AR), is a new tool for studying the economics of ancient painting. The current paper aims to clarify the relationship of the AR, which is based on tallies of firmly attributed works, to the actual lifetime productivity of an ancient artisan, and what this reveals about the total number of painters simultaneously active in the Kerameikos. The conclusions apply the AR concept to whole workshops rather than individual painters. Attribution Rates The inspiration for the AR is the 1959 economic study by R.M. Cook, who posited that Attic vase-painters worked at consistent rates which could be used to estimate total employment in the Kerameikos.2 If one artisan had decorated 3–4 vases per year out of the total of perhaps 40.000 pots that were known at Cook’s time, then about 70 painters must have been active, at least on average, over the 200 years of production. Because Beazley had also designated a large number of individual hands – about 500 from the 5th century BC – Cook thought the population should be higher by the Classical era, perhaps 100–125 painters.
    [Show full text]