DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Neonicotinoid Use, Registration, and Insect Pollinator Impacts in Minnesota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Neonicotinoid Use, Registration, and Insect Pollinator Impacts in Minnesota Review of Neonicotinoid Use, Registration, and Insect Pollinator Impacts in Minnesota August 2016 Photo credit: Joel, Gardner Review of Neonicotinoid Use, Registration, and Insect Pollinator Impacts in Minnesota August 2016 Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division 625 Robert Street North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-2538 Dave Frederickson, Commissioner Matthew Wohlman, Assistant Commissioner Report collaborators: Dan Stoddard, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Gregg Regimbal, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Jamison Scholer, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Joseph Zachmann, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Loretta Ortiz-Ribbing, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Rajinder Mann, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Acknowledgments: Carmen Converse, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Carmelita Nelson, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Robert Dana, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Dan Shaw, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Phil Monson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Judy Wu, University of Minnesota Robert Koch, University of Minnesota Gurinderbir Chahal, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Please direct inquiries on this report to: Raj Mann, Research Scientist Minnesota Department of Agriculture 651.201.6208 [email protected] Additional information available at: https://www.mda.state.mn.us/chemicals/pesticides/regs/pestprodreg.aspx http://www.mda.state.mn.us/en/protecting/bmps/pollinators.aspx 1 In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this information is available in alternative forms of communication upon request by calling 651-201-6000, TTY users can call the Minnesota Relay Service at 711. The MDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider. Table of Contents 1 Introduction and background .................................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Process .................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Criteria................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Insect pollinators and pesticides ........................................................................................................... 14 2 Neonicotinoid background, chemistry, and mode of action ................................................................... 16 2.1 Commercially available neonicotinoids ................................................................................................ 17 3 Federal, state, and other neonicotinoid registration policies and initiatives .......................................... 22 3.1 USEPA registration review .................................................................................................................... 22 3.2 USEPA refined assessment for terrestrial insects ................................................................................. 23 3.3 USEPA new risk assessment framework for pollinators ....................................................................... 24 3.4 US registrant product stewardship ....................................................................................................... 30 3.5 USEPA neonicotinoid product labeling requirements and pollinator protection ................................. 31 3.6 Label instructions and balancing pollinator protection responsibility ................................................. 32 3.7 Agricultural vs. orchard vs. landscape/residential application rates .................................................... 32 3.8 US state-specific restrictions on neonicotinoid use to protect pollinators .......................................... 34 3.9 Actions in other nations ........................................................................................................................ 35 4 Neonicotinoid use and sales .................................................................................................................... 39 5 Neonicotinoid applications and movement in the environment ............................................................ 45 5.1 Movement and environmental fate of neonicotinoids in plants .......................................................... 45 5.2 Movement and environmental fate of neonicotinoids in soil .............................................................. 47 5.3 Movement and environmental fate of neonicotinoids in water and sediment ................................... 50 5.4 Movement and environmental fate of neonicotinoids in air ............................................................... 54 6 Risks of neonicotinoid use ....................................................................................................................... 55 2 In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this information is available in alternative forms of communication upon request by calling 651-201-6000, TTY users can call the Minnesota Relay Service at 711. The MDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider. 6.1 Risk to insect pollinators ....................................................................................................................... 55 6.2 Pollinators and neonicotinoid exposure points in plants ..................................................................... 58 6.3 Honey bee colony level exposure ......................................................................................................... 59 6.4 Exposure routes .................................................................................................................................... 60 6.5 Pollinators and lethal impacts ............................................................................................................... 62 6.6 Pollinators and sublethal impacts ......................................................................................................... 65 6.7 Neonicotinoid interactions ................................................................................................................... 70 6.8 Risks to non-target organisms other than pollinators .......................................................................... 72 7 Benefits of neonicotinoids ....................................................................................................................... 78 7.1 Alternatives to neonicotinoids .............................................................................................................. 80 7.2 Neonicotinoids compared to other conventional insecticides ............................................................. 81 7.3 Neonicotinoids and IPM ........................................................................................................................ 81 8. Proposed action steps regarding use of neonicotinoids.........................................................................82 Appendix 1: A brief review of Apis mellifera health stressors .................................................................... 85 Appendix 2: USEPA neonicotinoid registration review activity ................................................................. 92 Appendix 3: Label additions for protection of pollinators ......................................................................... 95 Appendix 4: Additional MDA efforts to protect pollinators and their habitat .........................................97 Appendix 5: Abbreviations and definitions ............................................................................................ ..102 References .................................................................................................................................................104 3 In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this information is available in alternative forms of communication upon request by calling 651-201-6000, TTY users can call the Minnesota Relay Service at 711. The MDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider. Executive summary Neonicotinoid insecticides are currently one of the most widely used insecticides in the world because of their properties including potent broad-spectrum toxicity possessing contact, oral, and systemic activity. They are effective at very low concentrations, are less toxic to mammals, and are not cross- resistant to other classes of insecticides including carbamates, organophosphates, and synthetic pyrethroids. However, recent research has suggested potential toxicity concerns for neonicotinoids to various life stages of honey bees, native bees, as well as other pollinating insects. Pollinators are essential in the reproduction of 90% of the world’s flowering plants and 30% of the food human’s consume. Many plants such as alfalfa, apple, blueberry, sunflower and canola, cannot reproduce without the help from insect pollinators. The pollination services offered by insect pollinators also play a crucial role in the maintenance of biodiversity and ecological balances in natural ecosystems by providing important food and habitat for other wildlife species. Managed honey bees (Apis mellifera) alone pollinate more than $17 billion worth of crops in the U.S. each year and are regarded as the most important managed pollinator. Over the last 50 years, honey bees have been faced with a number of stressors that impact their health and survivorship including a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transport of Dangerous Goods
    ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.16 (Vol.I) Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS Model Regulations Volume I Sixteenth revised edition UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2009 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.16 (Vol.I) Copyright © United Nations, 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, for sales purposes, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the United Nations. UNITED NATIONS Sales No. E.09.VIII.2 ISBN 978-92-1-139136-7 (complete set of two volumes) ISSN 1014-5753 Volumes I and II not to be sold separately FOREWORD The Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods are addressed to governments and to the international organizations concerned with safety in the transport of dangerous goods. The first version, prepared by the United Nations Economic and Social Council's Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, was published in 1956 (ST/ECA/43-E/CN.2/170). In response to developments in technology and the changing needs of users, they have been regularly amended and updated at succeeding sessions of the Committee of Experts pursuant to Resolution 645 G (XXIII) of 26 April 1957 of the Economic and Social Council and subsequent resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Fluralaner and Afoxolaner Treatments to Control Flea
    Dryden et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:365 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1654-7 RESEARCH Open Access Evaluation of fluralaner and afoxolaner treatments to control flea populations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions in naturally infested dogs in private residences in west central Florida USA Michael W. Dryden1*, Michael S. Canfield2, Kimberly Kalosy1, Amber Smith1, Lisa Crevoiserat1, Jennifer C. McGrady1, Kaitlin M. Foley1, Kathryn Green2, Chantelle Tebaldi2, Vicki Smith1, Tashina Bennett1, Kathleen Heaney3, Lisa Math3, Christine Royal3 and Fangshi Sun3 Abstract Background: A study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different oral flea and tick products to control flea infestations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions over a 12 week period on naturally infested dogs in west central FL USA. Methods: Thirty-four dogs with natural flea infestations living in 17 homes were treated once with a fluralaner chew on study day 0. Another 27 dogs living in 17 different homes were treated orally with an afoxolaner chewable on day 0, once between days 28–30 and once again between days 54–60. All products were administered according to label directions by study investigators. Flea populations on pets were assessed using visual area counts and premise flea infestations were assessed using intermittent-light flea traps on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and once between days 28–30, 40–45, 54–60 and 82–86. Dermatologic assessments were conducted on day 0 and once monthly. Pruritus assessments were conducted by owners throughout the study. No concurrent treatments for existing skin disease (antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anti-fungals) were allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemicals Implicated in Colony Collapse Disorder
    Chemicals Implicated While research is underway to determine the cause of Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), pesticides have emerged as one of the prime suspects. Recent bans in Europe attest to the growing concerns surrounding pesticide use and honeybee decline. Neonicotinoids Neonicotinoids are a relatively new class of insecticides that share a common mode of action that affect the central nervous system of insects, resulting in paralysis and death. They include imidacloprid, acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. According to the EPA, uncertainties have been identified since their initial registration regarding the potential environmental fate and effects of neonicotinoid pesticides, particularly as they relate to pollinators. Studies conducted in the late 1990s suggest that neonicotinic residues can accumulate in pollen and nectar of treated plants and represent a potential risk to pollinators. There is major concern that neonicotinoid pesticides may play a role in recent pollinator declines. Neonicotinoids can also be persistent in the environment, and when used as seed treatments, translocate to residues in pollen and nectar of treated plants. The potential for these residues to affect bees and other pollinators remain uncertain. Despite these uncertainties, neonicotinoids are beginning to dominate the market place, putting pollinators at risk. The case of the neonicotinoids exemplifies two critical problems with current registration procedures and risk assessment methods for pesticides: the reliance on industry-funded science that contradicts peer-reviewed studies and the insufficiency of current risk assessment procedures to account for sublethal effects of pesticides. • Imidacloprid Used in agriculture as foliar and seed treatments, for indoor and outdoor insect control, home gardening and pet products, imidacloprid is the most popular neonicotinoid, first registered in 1994 under the trade names Merit®, Admire®, Advantage TM.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 161/Tuesday, August 24, 2021
    Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 47221 EPA–APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS State effective Missouri citation Title date EPA approval date Explanation Missouri Department of Natural Resources ******* Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri ******* 10–6.110 ........... Reporting Emission Data, Emis- 3/30/2021 8/24/2021, [Insert Federal Reg- Section (3)(A), Emission Fees, sion Fees, and Process Infor- ister citation]. has not been approved as part mation. of the SIP. ******* * * * * * ACTION: Final rule. year. To the maximum extent prudent and determinable, we must designate PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and critical habitat for any species that we PROGRAMS Wildlife Service (Service), are listing the determine to be an endangered or Franklin’s bumble bee (Bombus threatened species under the Act. ■ 3. The authority citation for part 70 franklini), an invertebrate species from Listing a species as an endangered or continues to read as follows: Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine threatened species and designation of Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Counties in Oregon, and Siskiyou and critical habitat can only be completed Trinity Counties in California, as an ■ 4. In appendix A to part 70 the entry by issuing a rule. endangered species under the What this document does. This rule for ‘‘Missouri’’ is amended by adding Endangered Species Act of 1973, as paragraph (jj) to read as follows: lists Franklin’s bumble bee (Bombus amended (Act). This rule adds this franklini) as an endangered species Appendix A to Part 70—Approval species to the Federal List of under the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Nation's Most Widely Used Insecticides on Birds
    The Impact of the Nation’s Most Widely Used Insecticides on Birds Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Birds The Impact of the Nation’s Most Widely Used Insecticides on Birds American Bird Conservancy, March 2013 Grasshopper Sparrow by Luke Seitz Cover photos: Horned Lark and chicks by Middleton Evans; Corn field, stock.xchng, sxc.hu; Calico Pennant dragonfly by David Cappaert, Michigan State University, Bugwood.org 1 Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Birds American Bird Conservancy would like to thank the Turner Foundation, Wallace Genetic Foundation, Jeff and Connie Woodman, Cornell Douglas Foundation and A.W. Berry Foundation for their ongoing support for American Bird Conservancy’s Pesticides Program. Written by Dr. Pierre Mineau and Cynthia Palmer Designed by Stephanie von Blackwood About the Authors Dr. Pierre Mineau began his long and distinguished scientific career studying the effects of persistent organochlorine compounds, like DDT and PCBs, on fish-eating birds. He then became responsible for the Canadian assessment of new and existing pesticides to determine their adverse impacts on wildlife. In 1994 he transitioned from regulatory reviews to full-time research on the environmental impacts of pesticides, achieving the rank of Senior Research Scientist at Environment Canada. Working with international collaborators and graduate students, he works on assessing globally the environmental footprint of pesticides. He also studies how birds are exposed to pesticides and how bird populations respond to pesticide use and agricultural practices. His work includes defining the ecological values of birds in cropland as well as estimating the incidental take of birds from various other human activities. He has written more than 100 peer-reviewed publications and has authored some 200 presentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Neonicotinoid Insecticide Hydrolysis and Photolysis: Rates and Residual Toxicity
    Neonicotinoid Insecticide Hydrolysis and Photolysis: Rates and Residual Toxicity A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Stephen Anthony Todey IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE William Arnold May 2018 © Stephen Todey, 2018 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Bill for all his help and guidance throughout this project, and Ann Fallon, who completed all the parent and product toxicity experiments. Thank you to Xun Ming at the Masonic Cancer Center (University of Minnesota – Twin Cities) who helped to develop the UPLC – MS/MS method used for this research and helped to operate the Orbitrap Velos. Thanks to undergraduates Josh and Amit for the work they helped to complete in the lab, and for all the dishes they washed. Thank you to all the members of the Arnold Lab Group for making me feel welcome and helping me throughout the process of completing my masters. Extra special thanks to Jill Kerrigan, Andrew McCabe, and Sarah Pati for their guidance in experimental design and data analysis. Finally, thank you to my parents, Francis and Marianne Todey, and Jennifer Anderson. I would not have gone this far without your help and support. Funding for this project was provided by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). i Abstract Neonicotinoid insecticides are currently the most widely used class of insecticides worldwide, accounting for 25% of total insecticide use. They are registered in 120 countries for use on more than 140 crops. Concern has grown, however, over their widespread detection in global surface waters, soil, finished drinking water, and wastewater, and for their potential role in colony collapse disorder in honey bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Water Relations: Absorption, Transport and Control Mechanisms
    5 Plant Water Relations: Absorption, Transport and Control Mechanisms Geraldo Chavarria1 and Henrique Pessoa dos Santos2 1The University of Passo Fundo 2Embrapa Grape & Wine Brazil 1. Introduction Although water is abundant on Earth - covering 71% of the total surface - its distribution is not uniform and can easily cause restrictions in availability to vegetal production. At global scale, these restrictions are easily observed in dry climates and can appear in other regions which do not currently experience drought, as provided by the future backdrop of climate change (IPCC, 2007). The influences of water restriction on losses in the production and distribution of vegetation on the terrestrial surface are significantly larger than all other losses combined which are caused by biotic and abiotic factors (Boyer, 1985). This striking effect of water on plants emerges from its physiological importance, being an essential factor for successful plant growth, involving photosynthesis and several other biochemical processes such as the synthesis of energetic composites and new tissue. Therefore, in order to characterise the growth and productive behaviour of plant species it is essential to have an understanding of plant water relations, as well as the consequences of an inadequate water supply. Broadly, the water state of a plant is controlled by relative rates of loss and absorption, moreover it depends on the ability to adjust and keep an adequate water status. This will be considered throughout this chapter. 2. Absorption and water flow through plants Independent of the species, plants require from the soil a water volume that overcomes its metabolic necessities. Through the transpiration process plants transmit to the atmosphere the majority of the water absorbed from soil (generally around 90%).
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of Leaf Apical Hydathodes in Four Monocotyledon Plants of Economic and Academic Relevance Alain Jauneau, Aude Cerutti, Marie-Christine Auriac, Laurent D
    Anatomy of leaf apical hydathodes in four monocotyledon plants of economic and academic relevance Alain Jauneau, Aude Cerutti, Marie-Christine Auriac, Laurent D. Noël To cite this version: Alain Jauneau, Aude Cerutti, Marie-Christine Auriac, Laurent D. Noël. Anatomy of leaf apical hydathodes in four monocotyledon plants of economic and academic relevance. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2020, 15 (9), pp.e0232566. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232566. hal-02972304 HAL Id: hal-02972304 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02972304 Submitted on 20 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE Anatomy of leaf apical hydathodes in four monocotyledon plants of economic and academic relevance 1☯ 2☯ 1,2 2 Alain Jauneau *, Aude Cerutti , Marie-Christine Auriac , Laurent D. NoeÈlID * 1 FeÂdeÂration de Recherche 3450, Universite de Toulouse, CNRS, Universite Paul Sabatier, Castanet- Tolosan, France, 2 LIPM, Universite de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Universite Paul Sabatier, Castanet- Tolosan, France ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 * [email protected] (AJ); [email protected] (LN) a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Hydathode is a plant organ responsible for guttation in vascular plants, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Six Cultivable Fish Species from the River Owena in Nigeria and a Template For
    water Article Quantification of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Six Cultivable Fish Species from the River Owena in Nigeria and a Template for Food Safety Assessment Ayodeji O. Adegun 1, Thompson A. Akinnifesi 1, Isaac A. Ololade 1 , Rosa Busquets 2 , Peter S. Hooda 3 , Philip C.W. Cheung 4, Adeniyi K. Aseperi 2 and James Barker 2,* 1 Department of Chemical Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba Akoko P.M.B. 001, Ondo State, Nigeria; [email protected] (A.O.A.); [email protected] (T.A.A.); [email protected] (I.A.O.) 2 School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames KT1 2EE, UK; [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (A.K.A.) 3 School of Engineering and the Environment, Kingston University, Kingston-on-Thames KT1 2EE, UK; [email protected] 4 Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 June 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: The Owena River Basin in Nigeria is an area of agricultural importance for the production of cocoa. To optimise crop yield, the cocoa trees require spraying with neonicotinoid insecticides (Imidacloprid, Thiacloprid Acetamiprid and Thiamethoxam). It is proposed that rainwater runoff from the treated area may pollute the Owena River and that these pesticides may thereby enter the human food chain via six species of fish (Clarias gariepinus, Clarias anguillaris, Sarotherodon galilaeus, Parachanna obscura, Oreochromis niloticus and Gymnarchus niloticus) which are cultured in the river mostly for local consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • 3115 SAPS Operating Instructions
    OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FIELD PLANT WATER STATUS CONSOLE March 2017 Fig. 1 - Model 3115 Portable Plant Water Console shown with 22 c/f Compressed Gas Cylinder, 3072V22 SOILMOISTURE EQUIPMENT CORP. P.O. Box 30025, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 U.S.A. Telephone 805-964-3525 - Fax No. 805-683-2189 Email: [email protected] - Website: http://www.soilmoisture.com Table of Contents Chapter - Page 1 Description ............................................................................................................................... 1 - 4 2 Technical Specification ............................................................................................................ 2 - 5 2.1 Weight .......................................................................................................................... 2 - 5 2.2 Dimensions ................................................................................................................... 2 - 5 2.3 Pressure Vessel ............................................................................................................. 2 - 5 2.4 Gauges .......................................................................................................................... 2 - 5 2.5 Valves ........................................................................................................................... 2 - 5 2.6 Connecting Hose .......................................................................................................... 2 - 5 2.7 Pressure Tank ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Studies on Boric Acid, Imidacloprid And
    TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES ON BORIC ACID, IMIDACLOPRID AND FIPRONIL AND THEIR BINARY MIXTURES AS INSECTICIDES ON GERMAN COCKROACH Blattellagermanica (L.) (DICTYOPTERA: BLATTELLIDAE) By FATMA SHERIF AHMED B.Sc. Agric. Sci. (Pesticides), Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ., 2007 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Agricultural Sciences (Pesticides) Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides Faculty of Agriculture Cairo University EGYPT 2015 ١ INTRODUCTION The German cockroaches, Blattellagermanica (L.), (Dictyoptera, Blattellidae) are the most common indoor pests, especially in multiple-family housing and the most significant pest in many parts of the world (Goddard, 2003). German cockroaches prefer warm, wet locations with high humidity such as kitchens, bathrooms and laundry areas. These conditions are available in several places as homes, apartments, restaurants, supermarkets, hospitals and other buildings where food are stored. Cockroaches are not only corrupt food but also transfer pathogens such as Salmonella, Shigella, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus (Baumholtz et al., 1997 and Tachbeleet al., 2006). Medically important parasites such as bacteria, fungi and molds, protozoans, viruses were isolated from external and internal surface of cockroach (Brenner, 1995). Cockroaches can also transfer both gram-positive and negative bacteria (El-Sherbini and El- Sherbini, 2011). A large number of neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic insecticides were used for German cockroach control, as this pest has a considerable ability to develop resistance to a variety of chemical insecticides(Cochran, 1989 and 1995a; Scott et al., 1990; Rust and Reierson, 1991; Rust et al., 1993; Holbrook et al., 1999; Espinosa-Islas et al., 2002 and Rahayuet al., 2012).
    [Show full text]